From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Tue May 18 20:20:44 1999

Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!feeder.qis.net!news.idt.net!nyd.news.ans.net!abq.news.ans.net!news-w.ans.net!news.lava.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news

Date: 19 May 1999 03:20:44 -0000

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology

From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to

	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity

	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.

Message-ID: <9cc1b023a4a64a1831d6301c069bd277@anonymous.poster>

Subject: FZ BIBLE repost 2/6 SOME 3RD ACC TAPES see ACT if spammed

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net

Lines: 904

Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:777877



FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

 repost



Posted separately to ARS & ACT, if any are missing from ARS

or drowned in spam (garbage instead of this header at the

start of the message), go to alt.clearing.technology for a copy.





FZ BIBLE 2/6 SOME 3RD ACC TAPES (1954)



**************************************************



Here are another 6 of the 3rd ACC (Advanced Clinical Course)

lectures of early 1954.



These are based on the old reels.  These lectures are currently

not available from the CofS.



3rd ACC Lectures 6A, 6B, 8, and 44 were posted last year.





Coming Soon: The 5th ACC (The "Universes" cassettes).





**************************************************



CONTENTS:



1. 3ACC-24 15 JAN 54 PRESENT TIME, SELF ANALYSIS

2. 3ACC-25 15 JAN 54 SELF ANALYSIS, CONT - PRESENT TIME

3. 3ACC-32 19 JAN 54 COMMUNICATION BY EMOTION: FLOWS, RIDGES

4. 3ACC-35 20 JAN 54 EXTERIORIZATION - COMMUNICATION IN THETA AND MEST

5. 3ACC-42 26 JAN 54 EXTERIORIZATION, KNOWINGNESS, REALITY

6. 3ACC-66 11 FEB 54 GROUP PROCESSING ON CLASS - THINGS TO BE





**************************************************



STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************

 



3rd ACC Lecture 25



SELF ANALYSIS, CONT - PRESENT TIME



(Alternate title: Present Time)



5401C15, 3ACC-25



January 15, 1954



(Rerecorded at St. Hill)





There's nothing like trying to audit a psycho in the face of a

large family.  



Female Voice: Can I interject a comment here Ron?  It seems to

me that when you're getting psychotics - you're probably getting a 

member of the family to audit anyway.  It's usually somebody else 

is even more psychotic and by making them - somebody reads off the 

lines, it might just happen to process the right member of the family.



You might.  Yes, this might just process the right member if you

got them to read Self Analysis.



I remember I was called in on a case up in, in England where a

medical doctor ... and he was in bed and so forth and he spent

the whole time telling me about how, how he needed some auditing

for the wife and - because she was so paranoid.  And he had all of

the medical terms for it, he had it all packaged.  And my god,

there he sat right there in the bed.  He wasn't even a case of

"what fog?"



And I audited him and brought him up a little bit but it was an

interesting fact that his wife was one of the sanest women I've

ever seen who was trying to carry on in the teeth of a screaming

psycho.  This was, this was the way that that family was

operated.  An auditor, a smart auditor by the way would contract

the whole family just if something happened.



Now, it seems like I've spent a lot of time telling you about

nothing.  Huh?  Nothing of great wisdom involved here.  But if

you just put it down there that the emergency situation, the

emergency attitude, when we say it in Scientology we mean a very

technical thing.  We mean something which is occurring without

time enough and so it's going to take a great deal of time to get

it done.



When an author gets rather bad off, he has the novel to write, do

you know he'll stand and look at it for months before he does it?

He just can't write it.  Why?  He hasn't got enough time to write

it.  "Well," you say, "But look, you've already wasted three,

four weeks.  Why don't you just sit down and write it?"  "Well, I

can't write it, I don't have enough time."



Well now, it sometimes occurs with an auditor that he looks at

that preclear and he realizes the preclear's real bad off, and

the preclear doesn't have enough time and this is restimulative

so the auditor doesn't have enough time.  And so we get a

fascinating problem.  We get no recovery.



And when I see cases hanging fire consistently and I see that

we're not getting perception changes at the time ratio of a case

level in a unit such as this which, you know, you're not at this

terrifically low case level.  I see that a person is trying to

audit the data which has just been given him or something of the

sort.  Actually, actually what it is to a large degree is an

emergency factor.



The golf club is being pressed so hard that the ball stays right

there on the tee.  The auditor wants to shine, he wants to do

something terrific, he wants to do something sensational.  But

what he probably ought to do if his preclear isn't making

adequate progress is simply reach back and pull out the little

copy of Self Analysis and start in.



Not that he can't do it himself just that way, you know, he can

just know that type of technique so well you can just start

reeling it off.  It isn't any particular insult to the preclear

either, by the way.  Honest I, if I could just communicate to you

the number of times when I have seen a neurotic person or a

person who was very badly bogged in present time problems,

recover on an hour's worth of mock-ups and that type of

straightwire, not directed at anything, just the most...



[Gap in recording]



..I've seen these people snap out of it and stop acting goofy,

stop trying to commit suicide, stop trying to do all sorts of

things.  It belongs in Step Six of SOP 8.  And a step six really

doesn't really respond to much of anything else.



Now, the funny part of it is it's so mechanical that the sanity

index of the person, which is a different thing a little bit than

his case index, you know, "how much problem have you got?" is the

big question.  How much problem do you have to handle?  Well, a

person is not merely really just as sane as he's handling his

problems, he's as sane as he thinks he is.  So sanity's something

different than the mechanical aspects of the case in unwinding

him.



It's a very funny thing that all these years they've been going

forward at insanity and unreasonableness and all of that, when

actually there was a terrific amount of just mechanical bric-a-

brac which was standing behind and interrupting the flow of

communication and so on.



A guy really perfectly sane with his ability, mentally and so on

and creatively, is markedly cut down by mechanical bric-a-brac

which doesn't have too much to do with his sanity.  Well, Self

Analysis will even crack through that if long enough applied.



There was one fellow who wasn't, was one of the roughest fives I

ever saw and he got Self Analysis for a couple of hours a day for

three months.  That's a hell of a diet, isn't it?  And it never

occurred to anybody to tell him just to be two feet back of his

head.  And one day one of his friends did, almost jokingly, and

he was.  He'd worked himself up, sometime down the line, why,

he'd cleared up enough so that he could be exteriorized easily

and with some certainty, and became a theta clear within the next

day or so.



By the way, you work somebody who is notoriously a five and you

work them as a five for a long time and you just keep on working

him as a five, you don't realize that he's become a four and then

a three and he's up around two now.  You just kept on working

this five, which is persistence.  OK.



Let's move up the auditing a little faster by being a little more

sensible about it.  In other words let's, let's step our pace up

by being efficient rather than being in a state of emergency.

Always about this time of the unit evidently you get a slight bog

along the line somewhere here and there.  If we don't interrupt

it rather sharply here and there, why, it'll continue.



Well, what happens is, is auditors have gotten a little bit

disappointed here and there in a preclear or something.  It never

occurs to the auditor he's probably overreaching the ability of

the preclear quite markedly.  And it's time when you look at a

preclear, there's plenty of time, there's always lots of time.



The MEST universe is kind of short on matter, that's true.  A

planet here and a planet there, and a sun here and a sun there,

and lots more space than there is matter.  That's true, it's kind

of short on havingness.  But at the same time let's not, let's

not try to do it all in a minute.  That attitude of trying to do

it all in a minute is what prevents you from doing it all in a

minute.



And I look over, look over this case and that case as they come

along and for instance there isn't a hard case present, there

isn't a real hard case present, not a real hard case.  We have,

because I've seen hard cases in my day.  When almost totally

occluded and almost totally psychotic, you've got a hard case,

that's a rough case.  Not just an occluded case, that isn't a

very rough case.  That'll work out one way or the other.



Now, you've got a weapon, double barrelled shotgun for one of

these cases that's tippy about this and that.  Very often you can

over audit the case, you can give them the technique we need,

obviously need, the obvious computation, but this person is so

bogged down in significances they can't reach it.



That's, that's true of a case that I saw last night.  All this

case needs, obviously all this case needs is just run "don't

touch," that's obviously all the case needs.  We just run all

kinds of variations and brackets on "don't touch."  The case was

raised to be very polite and, you know, well bred and cultured

and so forth, and has gotten to the point where of course he

can't touch anything.



And if you just got "don't touch" in various ways, of Opening

Procedure, in brackets and "where aren't you trying to touch

something now?" and what isn't, "give me three things aren't

touching you at this moment, give me three things which don't

want to touch you at this moment" back and forth and around and

around, in all possible combinations, including running some

flows and some agreements and masses of viewpoint.



Get masses of people out there, all of whom are agreeing now,

that's viewpoint processing by the way, masses of people, all of

them are completely agreed that nobody must touch anything.  And

then duplicate it and duplicate it and duplicate it and duplicate

it and duplicate it.  That sort of thing, you know, just don't

touch.  Why, this case would recover.



And instead of that, this case gets plunged into all kinds of

stuff.  I mean, stuff that's way off far away and so forth, but

it's liable to be very quick.  And everybody's been trying to

heal this case quickly for over a year.  Case must be healed

quickly.  Well, if the case had been healed slowly, it could have

gotten well in a week or two.



That's just real weird.  And it makes one feel rather strange

sometimes about processing to realize that the effective process

is the, is not the most brilliant process.  The two aren't there

together.  The most brilliant process is not necessarily the most

effective process.  The most effective process is the one which

works.  That's all.



Now, you'll find various processes working on various cases and

the one, one thing that you must, must be cautioned against is

working a limited technique too long on a case merely because

it's apparently working on the case.  You might be taking the

long road to China, you just might be.  For instance I can solve

things today with effort processing that would appear to be damn

miraculous.



The effort within the effort within the effort within the effort,

in terms of brackets.  The effort not to within the effort not to

within the effort not to within the effort not to, in terms of

brackets.  I can get more perception changes on a lot of

preclears but what's the trouble here?  Well, the trouble is that

it tends to validate the effort band and this is confusing to the

preclear and he buries himself away from present time slightly.



Although it has great effectiveness for quite a while and it can

be run for quite a while, there's always a time not to run it

because in the first place it's a GE technique normally.  You

cure up all sorts of things but it's a GE technique.  That is,

when effort; thought, emotion and effort; when I discovered

thought, emotion and effort and put them together in l951, so on,

we had reached the limit of auditing the GE.



If you're going to audit the GE, you just look at the techniques

from `51 back plus creative processing and you've pretty well got

it.  Nothing much else about it.  Alright.



Let me tell you now about something that happens to a preclear

and dig you out of this a little bit.  Nothing has ever exceeded

this, nothing we've ever said or anything we've ever done and so

forth has ever exceeded this or thrown it into question in any

way whatsoever.  Therefore it must be a rather simple central

portion of auditing.  And it is the problem and question of

present time.



Nothing has ever thrown this idea of present time into question.

There is nothing wrong with bringing a preclear to present time.

The whole computation involving present time is still the most

centralized computation which you have because of course the most

aberrative factor is time because it's the most hidden and

strange barrier.



The MEST universe is a game composed of barriers.  Well, the most

hidden and strange barrier is that barrier called time and the

person is in present time or he thinks he is someplace else.

Well, in view of the fact that a thetan can evidently create time

itself, it is very easy for a thetan of course not to be here and

yet appear to be here.



Now, I've run into people sixty and eighty hours in advance of

present time.  This probably wouldn't occur to you, this case,

but it's true.  They're way up.  It isn't particularly good, it's

that they had thought they had to crawl that far ahead of present

time in order to be cause.  This might be what you would call

the, an emergency margin.



They need that much time for a margin.  You know, they've got to

think all their problems out today, day after tomorrow, and then

maybe they'll be able to get far enough ahead of their problems

today in order to have.  It's a silly picture and it is not an

accurate one.  But it's, they just act as though they were two

or three days ahead of themselves.



You'll find the little child has his greatest objection to his

family on these grounds.  They're not interested in now.  The

live ones, the live up and coming adults are terribly interested

in day after tomorrow, awfully interested in the future.  And the

dead ones are all interested in gone and buried yesterdays.



Grandpop and Aunt Belle at one time or another was the queen of

the Mississippi, they just don't seem to have any connection with

anything except that time when.  And this is interesting like a

storybook, but it's not even vaguely interesting to the kid

because he's living right there in present time and you

can run this on a preclear just as such.  You could say,

"Alright.  Now get various members of your family not liking

present time."  And gee, this guy will just check off the whole

list, that'd be you give him enough auditing time.  Alright.



What's this, what's this thing about present time?  What, what's

it got to do with theta clearing?  Well, I very seriously doubt,

very seriously doubt this, that you can exteriorize an individual

who is not in present time, at least most of it.  And I would go

so far as to say that a very simple statement of non-exteriorization 

could be made by this alone.  He isn't exteriorizing, in synonym, 

he's not in present time.



He's in the future or he's in the past.  He's not here.  He has

to be able to exteriorize into now in order to have a certainty

and perception of now.  It seems reasonable doesn't it.  Well,

remember that a thetan can make time.  He can make particles move

so he obviously can make time, he can make space.  Well, if he

can do these things, why, then it's very easy for him to make a

time to be in.



It isn't that something is making a terrible effect out of him.

It may very well be that he's simply manufacturing a time to be

in.  It might not have any reality with regard to the past

either.  He just might, might have just made a time to be in,

maybe the time is day after tomorrow.  Of course it's right now,

but it's day after tomorrow that he's made to live in.



So let's not take this in the aberrated band now.  Let's stop

talking about aberration and just start talking about time and we

find out that to get an individual outside and with some

perception, there is a good chance of getting him out if he's

well in present time and if he isn't, why, he won't exteriorize

into the present time.  And let's just look at it like that.



Let's take the GE, way out of present time, and the thetan is

agreeing with the GE and the thetan tries to exteriorize and of

course he can't exteriorize because he's got this horrible

problem.  He's, if he exteriorized he'd have to exteriorize into

1870 and it's not there.  And so he says of course, "I can't

exteriorize."



Now, I'm not giving you the whole of the problem here when we

talk about present time and so forth.  You know the other

elements of the problem, the problem has many elements.  It has

cause and communication and duplication and it has the, these

other factors such as his ability to create, which is the loss of

the ability to create or wonderment about creation adding up to

an anxiety about the future and about loss, is a better statement

really of what's wrong with the thetan.



But let's just make this crude, this crude analogy about time.

See, a person can't lose the body because he can't create a body

and so on.  Well, let's look at this present time problem and

let's find out several things about it.  Is this person so much

in danger or in trouble according to him right in the present

environment that he can't exteriorize into it?  That would be

what would be interrupting theta clearing into present time.  See

that?



And therefore you could handle some sort of a present time

problem he has, handle it by creative processing, handle it by,

oh heck, I one time I was trying to work a preclear and all this

preclear could worry about was her husband being faithful to her

because the husband had recently hired a very nice looking

secretary.



This was really all that was wrong.  She had no other evidence,

she was going around trying to manufacture evidence, and I

matched terminaled the secretary for five minutes.  The problem

blew up and we went on with auditing and exteriorized her and the

session went right on off the line.  It was no difficulty

whatsoever with the case and all it required was just this.



But while that five minutes was going on, first she was apathetic

and then she was mad, and then she was this and then she was

that, wonderful.  What fireworks.  Well, being a limited

technique, if we'd gone on with this for the rest of the day we

had probably had her bogged down like mad at the end of the day,

but for five, ten minutes, an hour, that was fine.



Well, she wasn't in present time, see, she was worrying about

what all the evidences were, pro and con, and those evidences had

all occurred in the last few days.  And the funny part of it was

they didn't occur, they hadn't occurred but she thought they

might have occurred.  So she was living in day before yesterday

and last week and so on, all mixed up and it didn't have anything

to do, she wasn't in the room.



Well now, if you can look at a preclear and say, "Be three feet

back of your head," he's not, if you make the next statement,

"Well, looky here, he's not, he's not here," you will be for

workable purposes, right.  He's not here.



Now, the reasons why he's not here is what we go into when we say

duplication and communication and creation and all the rest of

the reason he's not here.  And we add this up we find out that

there is a powerful button, oh a powerhouse of a button, and that

button is resentment of present time.



Now, let's see why that's a powerhouse.  A person who doesn't

exteriorize well has gotten into flows.  The way you get into

flows is the way you get into this universe.  You decide to

resist it.  You know, it can't decide to resist you?  You have to

decide to resist it.  And so you start matching flow, matching

flows.  And this matching of flows is itself what causes ridges.



Continuous and anxious perception will pile up effort flows, very

heavy flows.  And so we get the manufacture of ridges and

agreement with the MEST universe being the same thing, which is

just this matching flows.  It starts flowing at you and you're

just getting along fine.  You're not flowing back at it, it's

just going right on its way just as happily as can be.  But it'd

love for you to team up and match and resist.



So all of a sudden, why, you decide one day that you'll match

those flows and you'll resist them in some fashion or another and

the next thing you know, you're slightly stuck in that time

period, see, just a tiny little bit.  And as these things

compound more and more and more, and you agree more and more and

more that you ought to resist more and more and more, and so on

more and more and more, and then the next thing you know, why,

bog.



Well, that's the mechanical without any deeper significance,

mechanical proposition behind non-exteriorization.  That's the

mechanics of it.  It's just matching flows, you agree with the

wavelength of the MEST universe.



Now look what a neat job it is.  Here comes light at such and

such a sonometer of wavelength, point several zeroes three or

something like that, and here comes this light.  Boy!  What a

tricky character you are to be able to match the wavelength of

that light and so pile it up.  Boy, that's really tricky.



In other words you have to, you have to just exactly hit on

exactly that if you'll be using these flows.  And as it's very

tricky to match it up, it's very easy to unsettle it.  One of the

easiest things I know of to unsettle is a matched flow from the

MEST universe.  It is tenuous, it is thin, it's very hard to

match one of these flows and it's awfully easy to unbalance it.



Now, if you will run "resenting present time" in brackets and

"desiring present time" in brackets and, this little technique I

gave you the other day, the "ideal person;" and having the

universe, all kinds of objects in it, accusing the preclear that

it didn't create it, you know, mountains say to him "you didn't

create me," the ground says to him "you didn't create me," so

forth, sky is saying to him "you can't create, you didn't create

me," round and round and round and round and round; now, that's a

little package there which I have used.



There are many of these little combination packages, you might

say, of auditing that I have used, just exactly that one, to

exteriorize one of the toughest, meanest cases I ever ran into.

And I have used that several times on preclears with considerable

success.  I never turned it over to another auditor before

obviously in it's component parts because these component parts

work in other combinations with other things.  They certainly

work together.  As I say, I've used this, I haven't handed it

out.  Alright.



It's just a routine, resentment of present time.  Well, that

merely tells him resentment, antagonism; you'll run into apathy

about present time.  You'll be very happily running the bracket

and all of a sudden you'll find out these two people he's put out

in front of him, he can make one of them make the other one

resent present time.  But by golly, this one who is making the

other one resent present time is himself in apathy.



So you want to watch this one because there are various emotions

on ridges.  Resentment is a flow and so it drops of course into

ridges, and the ridges are apathy, anger, boredom, and these are

your ridge levels.  So these three things turn up, apathy, anger

and boredom, when you run resentment.  What you're tryin to do is

get the live flows out of the way.  They're the - all that bother

him.



And then added to this technique is anything you can think of in

the line of granting beingness and being sorry for it.  "Well, I

granted the MEST universe beingness and now I'm sorry for it.  I

granted that mountain beingness and I'm sorry for it."  Fellow

says, "Wait a minute.  I never did grant that mountain

beingness."  "You did now.  Alright.  Let's grant that mountain

beingness.  Now be real sorry you did it.  Now be glad you did

it.  Now be sorry you did it."



Just pursuing our lecture of yesterday on that, that one added in

there is very efficacious.  Actually there are so many ways today

to crack cases it's just, I could keep going on here for an awful

long time trying to give you new combinations and so forth.  But

that combination I've used with great success.



Now, why do we run this "ideal person" in there?  That's the guy

had an ideal somewhere in some past life and he's stuck in it,

and he's trying to make the body he's in right now compare with a

body he had before and he's not satisfied with the body he's got

now.  He's trying to live in the year 1005.  He's got an ideal

person.



You can do that one with mirrors or you can just do it with a

mock-up.  Have him stand there and grant beingness to this ideal

person and have the ideal person grant beingness to him, and you

get the kind of character he has misfittingly been trying to be.

It's very funny to see a very good looking guy for instance,

who's nice and muscular, he's got a lot on the ball and so forth,

trying hard to be a, well, to be a girl.  This is weird.



Well, why?  Why would he be doing this?  His ideal person, the

best body he ever had.  Now, these things don't get wiped out, I

mean, they might as well have been yesterday.  The body you had

in the year minus five thousand on Arcturus might have well have

been at eight o'clock this morning.



I'm not trying to jam your track on you, but don't get this old

idea that it all wears out because time goes by.  You granted

something beingness on Arcturus and you're still sorry for it,

why, you're still sorry for it that's all.  You, it's all very

well for you to mock up the fact that you've forgotten all about

that life and that life isn't in there anymore and all that, but

this just isn't going to be effective auditing-wise.



You can neglect the most enormous quantities of this material

however, you can forget about the most enormous quantities of it,

but there's one...



[Gap in recording]



Well, the damndest one I ever ran into was the fellow who was

holding onto a beautiful blind girl.  Boy, was he pathetic.  Case

occluded, couldn't see, why not?  Where did it go off?  Well,

when he lost his wife.  To this point it was good, oh yes.  What

the hell is this all about?  There's nothing else was cracked

here.  Guy's perfectly sane, couldn't see though.  And I broke

through on this kind of a process.  The ideal person was really

parked on the track.  The ideal person was a gorgeous blind

empress.  This was a long time ago I ran into this process, I

even wrote a story about it once.



But by golly, I never had the processes which would've undone it

swiftly until very recently.  I undid it at the time I ran into it.  

But the total significance of the fact is this business about the

ideal person.  This was the ideal person.  My god, a gorgeous

blind empress.  Talk about havingness, the whole planet.



You talk about, you talk about appeal.  Everybody was very sad

for this girl.  Oh just, she was, she was a very gorgeous

empress.  And here was this guy being a blind empress.  But he

couldn't be a blind empress, but he had terrific potentialities

and possibilities to do exactly what he was doing.  He was an

airline pilot, an airline pilot, think of it, surrounded by all

these gorgeous hostesses and subservient crews with all of Earth

swishing by underneath you and oh, terrific things to do and be

and so forth.  He was a blind empress, he wasn't an airline

pilot.



So when his wife left him, this was a key-in of the loss of that

body and he just stuck in its death.  Truth of the matter was he

didn't give a damn for this wife at all, she was a little girl

that was very pathetic all the time.  But of course, she keyed

him in.  And there he was, so when he lost her that stuck him

in a past death.



Well now, the funny part of it was that he knew all about it

after a little bit of straightwire.  We were, I was

straightwiring him just, people his wife reminded him of, and I

was beating it around, and it was really no mystery.  The bird 

had it.  See, he knew about it, he knew he knew about it all

the time but he couldn't think about it any of the time.



Now, have you ever had the funny feeling in auditing like, well,

you can pick this lock, you knew that all the time.  You knew you

were trying to mimic your dog.  That's why you kept trying to

scratch yourself behind the left ear with your right foot and

figured that was the only really satisfactory way to scratch your

ear.  You knew it was the dog but you didn't know it, you see?



In other words this terrific panorama is sitting right there in

front of the preclear and he's never looking at it.  Well, that's

the way these things come up and that's the ideal person.  You

run that on an integration of character, and if we could call

this integration of character and be very technical about it,

why, we would be far off because we would be more technical than

it deserves, which is the guy wants to be something else than

what he is.  And he can't be anything but what he is.  See?

Can't be anything but what he is.  So life has him trapped.

He's resenting present time.  Lots of reasons why.



There's a process that's run on that that is questionable but is

on a case that is too far down, it's butchery.  But you always

have to run this on a thetan exteriorized.  "Be the past, be the

present, be the future.  Be the past, be the present, be the

future.  Be the present, be the past, be the future."



It's actually change of space processing because he's got space

mixed up with the past because of course the past is in some

other piece of space.  You'll find out he has the past to the

right of him and the present to the, above him or - oh something.

but usually by the way the present is in front of him, the, let's

see, the future is to the right and the past is to the left.

That's because of the way people read.



He also has prediction machines in the future telling him he

shouldn't know the future, and he has machines in the past

telling him not to know anything about the, or not to model it,

don't be a model of me in the past, you see, you don't care what

the past will say, the past will say what it says.



Well, there's another ramification of that, is you're

probabilities are that he's got a "duplication, mustn't

duplicate" crossed.  You know, he's got a duplicate, mustn't

duplicate.  And that is, I say the probabilities are that's the

basic-basic in any case and it's usually applied to time.  He

mustn't duplicate time, he must duplicate time.  He must

duplicate the time he was the blind empress, he mustn't or can't

duplicate the time he was the blind empress, and so he hangs up

on a maybe "can I duplicate or can't I duplicate?"



And this goes off into the second dynamic or the third dynamic or

god knows where.  That's basic on any case, that's the most

fundamental one we've got by the way, must duplicate, can't

duplicate.



[Question from audience - unintelligible]



Oh yeah.  Well there's, there's all of that, there's a whole battery 

of buttons from know down to, down to sex.  



[Question from audience - unintelligible]



Well, there's your, I gave you one that one day in just resisting 

knowing, resisting being, resisting looking, resisting emoting, and 

that would run out the whole darn band because that works in terms 

of flows.



You've got somebody in the auditing room there, all you do is

want him in present time and he's usually not in present time

because he'd hate to be in a point of the past but he'd love to

be in a point of the past, and between these two things, why,

he's hung up in two pasts which he's trying to dramatize in his

present.  And you think you're looking at somebody who simply is

right there and who will exteriorize and you know they should be

there but they're not.  And that's the whole problem there.



I ran a preclear one time who had been a very successful gunman.

Brother!  A space opera gunner, but a gunman.  A lot of space

opera, what they were dramatizing here out in the old west was

just space opera evidently.  Fast on the draw and that sort of

thing.  Boy, there's lots of that in space opera.  Man, this

reputation, this guy's reputation, he was not on the side of the

law, but his reputation was so tough from one end of the system

to the other that the police were terribly polite to him.  And

boy, was that successful.  And he hit the old west back in the

eighties and boy, was he successful.  But this was just a lock on

it.



And we tried to give this boy anything, no, he was regretting

this past dangerousness, you know, he wanted that past

dangerousness again and he had no dangerousness where he was.

And between these two things, the past, in the past he was

dangerous so he was in the past, he was not in the present.



You mustn't continue to go, just as a parting word on this by the

way, you mustn't continue to go forward on the idea that it is

normal and usual for a thetan to be in present time.  It is not

normal or usual.  Staying in present time is like walking a

tightrope because present time is going by pocketa pocketa

pocketa pocketa pocketa.  Each one of them is present time.



Any moment of the past has been at some time present time of

course.  And it's quite a trick staying in present time, quite a

trick.  What's the automatic machine that keeps him in present

time?  Well, when he depended upon an automatic machine to keep

him in present time, it ordinarily broke down some time or

another and skidded him out of present time.



That's why holding the two back anchor points of the room is very

beneficial.  It takes a hold of this old machine which kept him

in front of present time, you see, and it just runs it out.  He's

keeping himself in present time now.  See how that is?  He's just

taking over that machine and the actual benefit of hold the two

back anchor points of the room is putting out of the automatic

category staying in present time.  And the fellow gets it onto

the other side of (?).



If you don't want to see a preclear really stopped, really

stopped, this is about, this...  Preclear's every once in a while

tell you they're reaching for the bottom of the bucket, you know,

they can't go any further south.  Yes they can.  I'll tell you

how far south is, computationally.  And that is the preclear sits

there and at each instant - there's techniques, very simple ones,

designed on this by the way - any instant is lost.  He's at a

dead stop.  Every instant that goes by is lost utterly.  No new

instant gives him something new.



He doesn't look at it like that.  The motorcycle has really taken

this guy down the road.  Every instant finds him stopped and he

goes through a consecutive period of stops.  Stop stop stop stop

stop stop stop stop stop stop stop stop.  That's the way he feels

and it's all unreal, and the havingness of present time, all of

it is defeating him.  And the fact that it has arrived, that it

has arrived is simultaneous with the fact that it is irreparably

and forever lost.



He isn't necessarily psycho, which is the oddity of it.  Psycho

isn't the bottom of the bucket.  Psycho is just the lock-up on

must reach and can't reach, must withdraw and can't withdraw.

That is an emotion.  Psychotic attitude is, it is an emotion,

it's a feeling.  This other is the real bottom of the bucket.



The fellow can be perfectly sane and be in this bottom spot, but

that is the bottom spot, is every moment as it goes by is a lost

moment and he counts them as lost moments pong pong pong pong

pong.  But he's at a dead stop and he's sort of jerkily going

from stop to stop to stop to stop to stop to stop to stop.  It's

the most fantastic sensation.



I got into a pc's head that was going through it once, just to

see - that's a strange remark to make, that's true - and examined

exactly what was happening and that was what was happening.



For over about a year now and the reason I haven't ever, I didn't

used to ordinarily, but I did once in a while, pay attention to,

quote, "my own case" in order to give you data.  Well, for about

a year it hasn't been very necessary to do this.  All you had to

do is, you know, pop into somebody's head and match wavelengths

and feel how he felt, look over his facsimiles.  That's mainly

why we've made a tremendous amount of progress.  It wouldn't be

having anything to do with basic knowingness or anything like

that.



Well anyhow, we must investigate.  Where your preclear's

concerned, let's just go over this again, he may be an emergency

situation and when the emergency situation occurs the thing for

you to do is to be very efficient.



Now, sometime or other in your life you may have run into

somebody who was terribly efficient and you wanted to be terribly

nervous about the emergency, and there was no more maddening

person than that, and you may be unwilling to be that very

maddening person.  So let's get that one remedied.  And you don't

have to be that person.  That person is merely expressing a

manifestation that you can express too.



And the other one is if the preclear isn't exteriorizing he's not

in present time and we've been talking about this for a long

time.  There are many methods of remedying this.  One of them is

simply "come up to present time, be three feet back of your

head."  Rather fantastic technique, isn't it?  Happens to be

workable.  It'll work, oh, maybe every fifteen or twenty

preclears.  The guy's an awful tough preclear, you know that, so

you say come up to present time and be three feet back of your

head, and he is, perfectly stable, very certainly.



You go into an insane asylum, you go down the aisles of the

insane asylum and you tag every few patients, you tag every

patient that goes by and every few patients with just this come

up to present time, and they're sane and they stay that way.

Interesting, isn't it?



Well now, let's not go getting too bogged down about case state

or what you are or aren't doing, and whether your auditor's

simpatico with you or not.  We're not trying to make friends,

we're trying to make theta clears.



When you get your best innings in is when you are being the most

efficient, not when you're being the most brilliant.  And when

you look over the things that can be wrong with a preclear, why,

they all add up to basically this "must duplicate, can't

duplicate" cross up, and that's all over the track, that's all

over existence.  You see the sunlight coming in through that

window there, well, it's telling you you must duplicate it.

You're saying, "Well, I can't duplicate that, I got something

else to do."  That's existence in this universe.



And we go down the line from that we find out the biggest barrier

and why the MEST universe is a game of barriers.  The biggest

barrier of course is the most mysterious one and that's of course

time.  And the tightrope walk which the preclear's doing to try

to stay in present time is an interesting walk, even when he's

the sanest.  And we find that that's very easy to handle if we

handle it from the basis of people exteriorizing in present time.



As far as communication is concerned, your communication lag is

your direct index to the tone scale.  And it's actually a very

simple problem and I hate to keep telling you it's so simple,

it's so simple, it's so simple; it must be quite maddening to

somebody who's trying to latch onto some corner of it, knowing

all the time that it's very difficult, but it isn't.



Now, certainty of course; knowingness, certainty, certainty is

merely a synonym for knowingness but it's where you can get

knowingness to change over into human experience.  That's the

bridge, certainty is the bridge there.  Several bridges around

that are tremendously interesting bridges.



You're using tools, now, you very often will add to a tool to its

detriment but, for instance somebody was giving an assessment the

other day of what should a person create and destroy.  You know,

the old time create and destroy assessment on the eight dynamics,

this is a very good assessment, he's giving this assessment.  And

he's only doing one thing wrong about it.



He's finding out what the preclear could create, what the

preclear's willing to create and what the preclear's willing to

destroy, but the auditor continuously asked the preclear why.

And this was, had gotten the preclear bogged to the point where

the preclear was upset about an assessment.  That was easy to

remedy, just adding too much.



And so there's a little rule of the thumb goes along with all of

this.  The less significance you get into, the better.  And if

you have a question about significance, believe it.  That is to

say if you want to know whether you should go deeper into this

and find greater significance concerning it or not, if you've got

a maybe on this, see, then you answer the maybe by not going in.

That isn't saying you should never plow into a significance, it's

just saying that if you have a maybe as to whether or not you

should proceed into a significance, don't.



It's better to err toward nothing than toward something.  Your

preclear's really better off to be run wholly and entirely on

nothingnesses, if we were just going to do an arbitrary, stupid

division of things, he would be better off to be run totally on

nothingnesses than upon somethingnesses, if we had a choice

between these two techniques.  And you'll find nearly every

auditor early in the game will run a great deal of

somethingnesses and damn little nothingnesses.



Now for instance the ideal, the most horrible person he doesn't

want to be is the nothingness person.  See?  



Look in the mirror now and see nothing, absolutely nothing.  Try 

it sometime.  Now, look in that mirror and see nothing.  Don't 

see a face, don't see anything at all, you just look in that mirror 

with your MEST eyes wide open and see nothing.



You could make a preclear - more preclears will go into the

bathroom and vomit on that one.  That's the horrible thing you

mustn't be.  That's what you feared you must become.  You know,

mustn't become nothing, so you become nothing.  



OK.  Let's take a break and get to auditing on schedule this

morning for a change, with a seminar for the first group 

unit, for the first [unintelligible].  



So you have - oh 18 minutes for a break.



[end of lecture]