From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Mon Jul 12 17:30:17 1999

Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!feeder.qis.net!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.gctr.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news

Date: 13 Jul 1999 00:30:17 -0000

Subject: FZ BIBLE 3/11 MORE 3RD ACC TAPES (1954)

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

Message-ID: <6ac92b6bad3304f9620f64b2d15fe7a9@anonymous.poster>

Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to

	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity

	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.

From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net

Lines: 936

Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:864095 alt.clearing.technology:90508





FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



FZ BIBLE 3/11 MORE 3RD ACC TAPES (1954)



**************************************************



Here are another 11 of the 3rd ACC (Advanced Clinical Course)

lectures of early 1954.



These are based on existing freezone transcripts.  We had 2 of

the reels (3ACC-04 and 3ACC-63) which we used for a second proof 

to ensure the accuracy.  We did not have reels for the remaining 9 

(they must exist in the freezone somewhere because they were 

transcribed).  There are some problems with the transcripts

for 3ACC-23 and 3ACC-41, as noted in those files and if anyone

does have these tapes, please verify these transcripts.



In all cases, we also consulted Alphia Hart's notes on the

3RD ACC which were taken during the lectures and any descrepancies

or missing sections have been marked.



3rd ACC lectures 24, 25, 32, 35, 42, and 66 were posted

earlier this year as "FZ BIBLE 0/6 SOME 3RD ACC TAPES (1954)"



3rd ACC Lectures 6A, 6B, 8, and 44 were posted last year

and reposted earlier this year.



We are sorry to be issuing this ACC in bits and pieces but

NONE of these lectures have been available from the Cof$

for many years and we are finding them a few at a time amoung

old timers in the freezone.





**************************************************



CONTENTS:



1.  3ACC-04 BOREDOM, PACE OF LIVING, TRUTH

2.  3ACC-07 PROCESSING DEMO: RANDOMITY PLUS AUTOMATICITY

3.  3ACC-23 LABELS:  BEINGNESS AND JUSTICE, CONT.

4.  3ACC-37 LIVINGNESS PROCESSING SERIES (DYINGNESS)

5.  3ACC-40 GOALS OF 8-O (OT) ABILITIES

6.  3ACC-41 BASIC DATA ON 8-O (OT)

7.  3ACC-43 O.T., INVERSION: COURAGE AND MOBILITY

8.  3ACC-57 GROUP PROCESSING ON CERTAINTY, 8 DYNAMICS

9.  3ACC-59 GROUP PROCESSING, AUTOMATICITIES

10. 3ACC-63 GROUP PROCESSING ON CLASS - BEING MEST

11. 3ACC-67 GROUP PROCESSING ON CLASS:  RESIST EFFECT



Jan to early Feb 1954.



**************************************************



STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************

 

3ACC-23 LABELS:  BEINGNESS AND JUSTICE, CONT.





[Freezone transcript, not done by Fzba, we do not have the

reel to check this one, if someone does, please verify.

Checked against Alphi Hart's notes]





LABELS:  BEINGNESS AND JUSTICE, CONT.



5401C14, 3ACC-23



(alternate title: Beingness and it's application in terms

of communication)



============



[The transcript below begins with an erroneous segment from

3ACC-24 (see the correct transcript for that tape, previously

posted).  Since tapes 3ACC-22 and 23 are a single lecture in 

two parts, Alphia Hart's notes treat them as a single unit.  So 

here is the beginning of the notes which probably correspond to

3ACC-22, but might also cover a missing beginning to 3ACC-23.]



Psychology has contributed only one thing - that human beings

are not mice.  The GE is an animal that has been brought up in

spite of itself by  a thetan.



Areas where food is short replace eating with hunger.  For one

"goofy" on the subject of sex, have him find places where he

can't survive, because the decision he can't survive is 

concurrent with his decision he can't create.  One who has

decided he can't survive usually goes into the hectic application

of sex.



(Add to the "applause scale" in Martha Courtis's book: Eating

and Sex)



Actually, ridicule, betrayal, etc. are all attention.  The

most awful thing you can do to anybody is to ignore them.



Knowingness and Beingness are two different kinds of operation.

They're easy to confuse.  Beingness and Awareness cross with

Knowingness, but they're not.  Beingness is the first tiny

enterance into energy - and knowingness is not.  It's part of

the dwindling spiral.



A preclear even has some enjoyment out of being bored.

Below that, at antagonism, they can't enjoy anything.



Beingness conforms to .5 on the Tone Scale: he looks up

at the rest of the Scale, and evaluates Enthusiasm as

grief expressed too loudly, and knowing all things to cry

about.



The less efficient a police organization is, the more it

dabbles with identities.  It gets to the level where all it's

interested in is using the identities to collect taxes.  If

you go into a police station today to report a robbery, you'll

probably be sorry you ever closed terminals with the police.



Putting tickets on the windshield of a car is illegal, 

according to our own Consititution, which requires personal

service.  Police get away with it because people don't want

the bother of going down and getting a trial date set;

so they send in the amount of an arbitrary fine.  This is

duress and extortion - so there's no difference between a

criminal and a cop.



As beingness runs down, justice runs out.  You'll find

a preclear as low on the Tone Scale as he cannot enforce

justice.



Technique: Have the preclear name some things he can do to

others; name some things he can't do to others; name some

things others can do to him; name some things others can't

do to him.  This may demonstrate to him that anybody can

do anything to him, and he'd be powerless to prevent it -

especially if he's dead.



Have him mock himself up where anybody can communicate

with him; then mock himself up where nobody can communicate

with him unless he wants them to.



[At this point the notes correspond to the beginning of

lecture 3ACC-23 given below (after the erroneous section

of 3ACC-24) - see the actual transcript from this point

forward]





============



[The beginning section of this transcript is actually from

lecture 3ACC-24 (which has been checked against the reels)

 - see that transcript beginning around line 235.  It is

unknown whether the transcript was mixed up or whether the

tape itself was overwritten.  The erroneous section is

included here to aid in sorting this out if and when the reel 

is found]



..did locational drills.  And just did a tremendous number of

locational drills, and did goals on the person.  And then did the

grand tour.



But the whole thing, the whole thing was a rather easy job of

auditing except those first few hours.  That was brutal.  I'd

rather have been shot than leave my body sitting in that chair,

leaning up against the chimney, looking down through the roof

saying, "Three, OK.  Um, yes, yes, it was very interesting.  Um,

um, that's very interesting.  Now can you remember...  Up against

what?"  "Yappity yappity yappity yappity yappity yappity yappity

yappity yappity yappity yappity yappity yappity yappity yappity

yappity yap yap, yap yap, moomouwm."  Comm lag.



Now there's the other kind of a comm lag where they go silent.

And this silence is about the same breed of cat, it's just the

other side of the apathy band.  You know a person can be in

perfect apathy and still use their voice to defend?  I talked to

you yesterday about defend, you know?  Well, this is just another

symptom of defense.  A person can throw up such a barrage of

words that you plain ordinary never get through this barrage of

words, that's all.



So, where our difficulty lies with a preclear is getting in that

original communication, and that's your trouble with a psychotic,

you see, getting in that original communication.  But how long

does it take to take a case from all the way south to theta

clear?  Well, it would find most of its time occupied in the

lower band.  You know, the first jump would be the most difficult

one, and then the jumps happen with greater rapidity.



Well, there are very probably techniques which, as we swing

along, will find our people more and more receptive, and more and

more,  well, easier and easier to communicate with, and will find

things in a far better state of auditing in general.  Probably

there's a lot of things that we're using crudely now we will

refine in their uses.  But there isn't too much reason to, there

isn't too much reason to go around hoping.  And let's just look

at what, I mean hoping, you know, that all of a sudden well we'll

drift along, and, "We won't study this because Ron's going to

come up with something that is newier and brassier."  That was

perfectly true a few months ago.



The funny part of it is right now we find ourselves using,

though, such a process as Self Analysis.  Funny.  Gee, that's

been around now for over a year, the way it's now written up.

Alright, what are you going to do with this preclear who doesn't

make a good jump?  Let's take a preclear who's occluded, doesn't

exteriorize, has no certainties and so on.  If you audit that

preclear for fifteen minutes and the preclear is not feeling

well, doesn't feel at all in company with life, you can do a lot

of things.  But the odd part of it is, one of the more beneficial

things you can do it just reach for a copy of Self Analysis.



Now this, mind you now, this preclear is occluded, can't get

mock-ups, has no great certainty on anything and so forth.

That's quite interesting.  What you do is at least get him to

make the gesture toward havingness.



Alright, if this person has the gesture there ready to deliver,

you know, put up a mock-up, you getting an idea doing something,

you at least get an associated chain of thought going.  Then you

get a little mass added to the case.  Quite interesting, isn't

it?



Now, some of the somatics that go through as a person is just

gesturing at putting up these things is fantastic.  That's

because his havingness is being rebalanced or unbalanced, and so

on.  But you can change the case, that's the main thing which you

are trying to do anyway.  I hope you're trying to do that.



Now, where, where do we have, where do we expect then our case to

bog, or where is the toughest point of auditing?  Well, it

happens that it's right at the beginning, right there at the

beginning of the case.  I'm sorry that it is that way, but it is.

Right at the beginning.  Now you people could feel very

discouraged about one preclear or another who insists upon being

too this way or too that way, you know, doesn't quite increase

and so on.  Well, with such a preclear you're making what we

would call long haul.  And you're making some kind of a break up

through the level.



Now you're going to slow yourself down to the degree that you get

anxious and start pressing.  You know, the fellow that; you know

the fellow that presses on the golf club, he never gets on the

green?  Well you're going to err more times in auditing in that

direction than in any other.  You're going to be pressing on that

golf club, and beating out techniques, and thinking it's a

fancier technique that's needed, thinking it's a fancier

computation, and all the time it's right there on the stove, the

old frying pan that this preclear ought to be cooked in, it's

just an ordinary frying pan.  It's just exactly what you're

doing.  Your speed picks up markedly when your understanding of

this point picks up.  And one of the reasons a preclear doesn't

operate, and one of the reasons that an auditor doesn't operate

very easily on this early span or the early run, one of the best

reasons why he doesn't, has to do with his urgency.  You know, he

gets this feeling of urgency from the preclear, or he gets the

feeling that nothing can be done from the preclear.



Here's the big point, the urgent, urgent.  You know, it's very

urgent, it's an emergency proposition.  Well now, let me tell you

how to handle an emergency.  Be efficient.  That's how to handle

an emergency.  I've seen more emergencies go to hell and really

deteriorate, simply because everybody had to be effast, and it

didn't occur to anybody to be efficient.  I well recall one time

an engine had a shell in it.  And boy, everybody was rushing

around there, trying to put out a resulting fire, and man, they

were running around there with empty extinguishers and empty

buckets of sand, and they couldn't find the bales of rags, but

when they did find them they couldn't find knives to cut bales of

rags and so forth.  And do you know what was sitting immediately

above that engine?  Immediately above the engine was the valve

which flooded the engine room with spray.



I listened to this hubbub going on down there, just time after

time I called down through the speaking tube and say, "Do you got

that fire out?" expecting the tanks to go up at any moment or

something to happen saying, "Do you got that fire out yet?  Is it

under control?"  And then give a couple more conning orders,

"Just stems over to the..."  So finally I took the coolest

looking fellow I could see on the bridge and so forth, and I

said, "Go below and put that fire out."  He came back a couple of

minutes later, just that, a couple of minutes later and he said,

"The fire's out, sir."  "What happened?"  He said, "Nobody had

pulled the sprinkler cord.



Well I swear, they were fooling around with that fire for about

twelve, fifteen minutes.  See, it was an emergency, and people

get wasteful of time in the face of an emergency.  And you as an

auditor, when you feel yourself getting very, very anxious about

this case, and pressing very hard on the case, do you know what

you should do with that time?  Just a little discipline for you,

just reach back and pick up a copy of Self Analysis.  Now that

you have do so doesn't mean you're rattled on the case, you

understand, but this is probably what the case needs.  The case

actually is benefitted by the feeling that there's something slow

going to be done.  It gives him the reassurance too, well it

might not all have to be done by five o'clock.  See that?



So, here's something for you to, to; here's a security for you to

depart from.  I recommend very thoroughly to you this, and I

recommend it in, in the face of an awful lot of data.  I've seen

that however deteriorate when an auditor didn't, well when he had

too much urgency, that's all.  There's too much emergency in the

air, and so on.  They don't pay attention to that little book.



I'll tell you the routine course of a preclear in bad shape

applying to my office for assistance.  First thing I do is write

them a letter; I've gotten down to a point where there's a

pattern of these letters.  The first letter says, "Well here's a

copy of Self Analysis.  Get somebody to read it to you," or read

it to the person who is in trouble, either way.  "Now tell me how

you make out."  The second reply is to the effect that the person

has now gotten worse, and what are they going to do?  So the

letter that goes back in answer to that is is, "Get the copy of

Self Analysis and use it."  And the next letter that comes back

is in a reply to this copy of Self Analysis, they have received

it, but they think it's best to take the person to see somebody

in Salt Lake City, or on the moon, or someplace.  And then

finally, you'll get a letter in; months have gone by by now.  And

they write in to you and say, "Well, the person, we took the

person to Salt Lake City, and we finally wound up and saw a

psychiatrist.  He's been in and out of the sanitarium now, and

has had five electric shocks, and so forth, and now what do we

do?"  And you write back and you say, "Please open the copy of

Self Analysis and begin on page, I think it's sixty-six, and

start in."



Six, seven, eight months is a lag on this.  And they finally do,

and the person finally bails out of it, if they do it at all.

But by not reaching for the technique that has some resolution

for the case, they sacrifice six or eight months.  Now this is

what?  This is a psychotic communication lag, isn't it?  That's

all.



So if you know that this is a symptom, an emergency and waste; do

you know the amount of waste there was in the war?  When they

waste time they have to waste havingness and everything else.

They finally wind up; in any emergency homo sapiens winds up much

worse off ordinarily, than if he'd just stood back and let the

damn house burn down.  Do you see that?  That an emergency

attitude is one which worsens, not which one which betters the

situation.  Honest.



In most fires it would actually be better if they just stood back

and let the house burn.  I've seen a fire take place on a street,

and the only efficient thing that was done about the whole thing

was to turn some water on the two or three neighboring houses, so

they didn't catch fire too.  That was efficiently done.  And that

was done by the people who owned the two or three neighboring

houses, usually, and was done with a garden hose.  But here are

all these firemen all over the place, and here are these

tremendous streams of water.  And here are the axes and the

battering rams, and so forth.  And inevitably you always; go back

to the place the next day and take a look, it is burned to the

ground.  I mean, there's nothing salvageable about it.  Well now,

it didn't much matter how much effort was put forward into the

fire ordinarily, the result is about the same, with this

difference, is the more emergency there was about it the more

additional property to that property was injured.  I have seen

the most wonderful things happen in fires.  One time I saw a lady

in the fifth floor of a building which was on fire.  She was

completely neglecting the fact that she had better come

downstairs, and bring that baby with her.  And she had some

Heppelwaite or something, china, or whatever you call it.  And

she did it all up in a blanket, and she took it out on the fire

escape.  And without even saying, "Stand clear," to anybody

below, dropped it five floors.  Yet she just had seconds left.



[a dozen lines from the end of 3ACC-24]



================



[A this point the transcript takes up properly with material

from 3ACC-23]



..



.. to you that wanted to.  Duplicate it.  Now mock yourself up

in the condition where anything that wanted to could communicate

to you.  And duplicate it.  Now mock yourself up in a condition

where nothing could communicate with you if you didn't want it

to.  Do that again.



Now how many on the first one got dead body?  Sick body?  What it

is of course is a dead body.  Now here is the boy who has gone

into an identity.  The most identity there is is a dead body.

That's unfortunately true.  The most identity there is is

something which is completely motionless, and identity and motion

are themselves a direct index.



As the identity increases the motion decreases, 'til you get

complete stillness.  Now if you want a terrifically imposing

identity, you just fix yourself in one spot very fixedly, and

you'll get an identity.  Now the more thoroughly you fix yourself

the more identity you'll get.  Now that doesn't seem to hold

true, because you think of a dead body as not having any right to

use his name.  Even though he has the name, Bill, he hasn't any

right to use that name, but wait a minute.  He has no right to

motion.  He has a right to a name but no right to motion.  And

anybody can find him, anybody can communicate with him.



For instance, as long as there's the slightest bit of life in an

individual he can protect or defend the body in some fashion.  In

other words, the body cannot be communicated with totally.  For

instance, damp might not be able to communicate with it, Earth

might not be, dirt, these things can't communicate with it.  He's

protecting it to some degree, you see?  He could still remove it

into the situation, one way or the other, where he had some

protection.  But if that body is dead, immobile, then Earth, and

rain, and anything can get to any part of it, to the deepest part

of its structure.  Mold; animal runs along, it can run over it,

anything can touch it in other words.  Somebody comes along after

the battle, the body's lying there dead, why, they generally just

pump a few volts into them, or wack them with a acute force,

something of the sort.  They quite normally treat bodies very

disgracefully after a battle.  They recognize this.  In modern

times they plow them into trenches and send empty coffins home to

the folks.  But there is the end product of MEST universe

communication.  Do you see that?  And it's an identity.  And

identity tends in this direction.



Why does the FBI know you, I fooled you.  You just thought I was

yapping about law and order.  I'm not yapping about law and

order, there isn't any law and order, that's what I'm yapping

about.  Why's the FBI want every criminal's fingerprints every

place in the land?  So they can communicate with them, of course.

You see?  So the better the fingerprint files, why, the better

the communication.  So when the communication is utterly perfect,

and they can reach him at all times, and no communication

whatever can be prevented in the FBI, then they think they have a

good police system.  They haven't got a police system, they got a

death system.  See?  And a society degenerates to a point where

that system itself considers every citizen within it having no

right to move without state permission.  And you have this along

the iron countries today.  You have no right to move unless you

have the permission of the state.  You haven't any right to walk

without permission of the state really, because you're stopped,

and your papers requested every few blocks.  Interesting, isn't

it?



That's all on the basis of cutting down motion, cutting down

motion.  And the more motion cuts down, why, the less freedom

there is.  So this is other determinism, and other restriction,

which of course winds up in the no-freedom of death.  Death is

the no-freedom level.  That's why we have the tone scale.  The

tone scale is really just the tone scale from life to death.



Now it so happens because of the thetan that there are levels

below death, as you conceive it.  But these are not communication

levels worth a nickel, because the truth of the matter is - and

this will pick you up as your spirits sit there and sag, you poor

people, having stuck you in a few past deaths - get this one; the

only thing MEST can communicate with is MEST, and you're not

MEST.  So it must work out on the basis of protection that you're

doing, and if you're mobile at all, if you're mobile at all it

must be that you're capable of some protection.  And the degree

of protection of which you are capable is the degree of mobility

which you can achieve with that MEST which you're trying to

protect.  You see that?



Alright.  Then let's see that the MEST universe, it could be said

this way, like I was saying it before, which was why you got so

depressed, that the MEST universe can at any time communicate

with you directly.  Well it can communicate with thetan plus body

pretty well, but it can't communicate with a thetan, except as he

chooses.



Now the individual who steps out of the body and then can't see

anything right is simply really exercising his methods of

protecting himself.  He isn't in communication with the MEST

universe because he conceives communication from the MEST

universe to be dubious, at best.  You know, it has dubious value.

MEST can communicate with MEST.  It's all very well to say the

MEST universe is composed of consecutive spaces, so therefore any

part of the MEST universe can be in communication with any other

part of the MEST universe.  This shouldn't make you unhappy.  You

would think it was a funny football field where goal post one

couldn't communicate with goal post two because they were on two

entirely different planes in two different towns.  That's be a

real silly game, wouldn't it?  So if there are uninterrupted

spaces between here and Jupiter, or uninterrupted spaces between

here and the next island universe, why, of course there can be no

game.  It's just the game is pretty big, and can get pretty

vicious.  But it's a big playing field.  But just as a football

player can go over and sit on the side lines, so can a thetan go

over at any time and sit on the side lines, as far as the MEST

universe game is concerned.



Now, what the thetan's been doing, he's rigged himself so that

this can be a fairly covered up fact, so that he won't have to

remember past lives, so that he won't have to have any identity

in those lives, because he's really as immobile, he believes, as

he has identity in those lives.  There's nothing wrong with

remembering those lives, but the more identity you kick up for

him in past lives, the less mobile he becomes, the more times

he's stuck on the track, if he considers that an identity, as a

symbol, is in itself valuable.  So we come back to the definition

of a symbol.  A symbol is an idea wrapped up in energy, which is

mobile, which takes of course space.  It's energy in space, but

it has mobility.  It definitely has mobility.



Now it's an idea wrapped up in energy.  So anything can

communicate with it, of course.  In the MEST universe, anything

can communicate with a symbol.  Anything.  The book down at the

library can be thrown out back and a horse can see it.  He

doesn't have to be able to read to communicate with the book.

Well he'd have to be able to read to communicate with the deep

significance of the book, but we're not talking about

significances.  We're just talking about  a book.  And here's a

book, and a horse can look at a book.  So can some dead leaves

look at a book.  Any shaft of sunlight, or any drop of rain can

communicate with that symbol.



So anything in the MEST universe can communicate with a symbol,

really, except for this:  Except for the protective instinct of

life.  Now you think life is destructive, but it isn't life that

you're fighting.  Many people think they're fighting life, and

they are hard to live with to the degree that they think they

have to fight life, that they think that life is their randomity.

They're ... to live with as they haven't chosen life for their

randomity, and recognize rather clearly that this playing field

itself is a liability.  Now the only liability there is to this

playing field is that it is consecutive spaces, and can

communicate from one corner of it to the other consecutively.

And the only liability a thetan has, that he loses his ability to

protect those masses or symbols which he is shielding from

communication.  See that?



So he is as able as he can protect.  There's nothing wrong with

protecting and defending.  An individual cannot possibly exist

without some ability to protect.  It's a funny thing that there's

one thing that isn't a dichotomy in all of this, and this too

works out very interestingly in terms of an interesting comment.

You can if you wish run on a preclear your problem.  You know,

you just say, "The preclear's problem is this, and the preclear's

problem is that."  We use it all the time very loosely, because

that's our frame of reference here in this particular culture.

But do you know that if you were to double terminal "my problems"

you'd probably get no action?  You get no big action, you just

double terminal out there, four times.  You can try it on a

preclear if you want.  Because I am telling you about it it might

or might not work on you, but you get four terminals, "my

problems," and you just don't get much action out of it.

Nothing, nothing violent.  But you put up "other people's

problems" as four terminals, put it up there four times.  Try it.

I don't see a lot of sighs around here.  Getting a little action

out of those mock-ups?



Now put up "my own personal problem."  Now which one had the most

action connected with it?  (... others ...)  Yeah, a lot of

action on that, other people's problems, 'cause that's all the

problem you got.  There isn't any other problem than the other

person's problem.  This works out very basically from this

business of protection, communication.  Now by our definition

communication is any particle flow.  That's communication.  So we

find out that a bullet or a Western Union telegram or anything

else; as a matter of fact, a thetan doesn't much distinguish,

mostly because good and bad are a matter of consideration.  Well

he can start to consider that bullets are valuable communications

and good communications, and Western Union telegrams bad

communications, even though they tell him he's won a million

dollars in a lottery.  You see, we've got that consideration

enters in there that fools a lot of people.  They think there are

contra-survival and pro-survival elements, just because of the

judgement they're utilizing, and a frame of reference in which

they are working out the immediate problems with which they're

dealing.



If a bunch of boys get together to destroy a company of the

enemy, believe me they are not going to consider any beneficial

fact a good fact.  The only good facts they have there are

destructive facts.  So they come up and they say, "Well alright,

let's fix up some hand grenades so they have a one half second

fuse.  And let's fix them with the enemy labels, and leave them

in the enemy supply dumps.  That'll do for a few of them, and

let's see."  And everybody would sit around, and after somebody

tossed that one up, why, they congratulate each other you know.

"That's a good one, that is.  That's real good," and so forth.

Well, it's just a matter of viewpoint, a matter of beingness.

It's what company or what army they belong to, what fact is good.



Now they find this pile of hand grenades with one half second

fuses in their own supply dump, and a half a dozen of their boys

use them.  Now that's a bad fact.  No good at all.  It's what

they're protecting that makes things good or bad.  And what

they're protecting against that makes the bad.  And this breaks

down to just the business of beingness.  What are they being

specifically?  What are they being?  Are they being themselves or

being the enemy soldiers?



Now once in a while some fellow sails in at a high tone, and he

looks over this game and he says, "Isn't that interesting.  Those

fellows are being blue shirts, and these fellows over here are

being green shirts.  Hm."  A lot of nice guys on both sides.

He'll say, "What you guys fighting for, huh?"  Well they've got

lots of reasons.  Yeah, they'll have, they have more reasons than

anything else.  Well this guy was fairly high toned, won't

interfere particularly with them fighting, but he's liable to

point out to them how they could make a much better game out of

it, because it basically looks like a game to him, you see?  And

he finds that the green shirts keeps all their troops waiting for

two years before they let anybody fight, and this spoils the

game.  And the blue shirts do something else, and that spoils the

game.  And he says, "Gee whiz, you know something?  I'm going to

let you fellows in on something.  You're geared, according to

your time ratio to have a game here, and I don't find you doing

anything.  Why don't you have a game?"  You know, that doesn't

seem right to him, they don't have a game.



Alright, some other guy drifts in, and he's in real apathy.  He's

been whipped.  He knows he can't protect anything.  He's just

sure the green shirts and the blue shirts alike will turn on him.

Even if he's a green shirt he knows the green shirts will fight

him, if he's a blue shirt he knows the blue shirts will fight

him.  And he goes in and he says immediately on this level,

"Well, killing is wrong, and everything is wrong, and fighting is

wrong, and you shouldn't do that.  And what you should all get is

at Beastianity or something."  That's strictly from a self

protection method, because he knows he can protect nothing, he

has to have no action.  So you get a mockery level on the tone

scale, which is the mockery level is a high level on the tone

scale.  You see they look alike at a first glance.  You have to

distinguish between the two, and the distinguishing thing between

the two is how much motion is being called for.



Some fellow who is talking very, very benignly, but calling for

no motion of any kind whatsoever, and no action of any kind

whatsoever, he's on the mockery band.  But somebody could talk

very, very benignly way on up the scale.



Now a thetan is in good shape and having a good game on this

percentage.  He's using fifty percent of his activities as

attacking, and fifty percent of them as defending, or protecting

force.  He's so composed that about fifty percent of his activity

has to do with attacking, and about fifty percent has to do with

defending.  And he'll have a good game and a well balanced game,

and he'll go on and he'll have a lot of fun, and lots of things

will happen.  And the reason I give you this is because it's a

figure that holds good in almost any sport, including war.

That's a good, good average.



For instance, if you imbalance infantry and make them a ninety

percent holding force, they're going to lose.  Look at France.

They made France into a hundred percent holding force in the

Maginaw line.  You can't handle infantry like that, that's all

there is to it.



Now let's take a besieged castle.  The odd part of a besieged

castle is it has to do so much attacking.  You say, "But it's

besieged, it's ringed around by its attackers, and it can't

possibly do any attacking because it's ringed around by its

besiegers and so forth," and that's a sort of definition of the

game.  Well, if you look into history and the wars that had to do

with siege craft and so forth, you'll find out that about the

deadliest thing to sting would be some kind of a castle like

that, because if it just sat there and defended itself it would

fall.  The besiegers could sit there and their supplies could

come in, and they could get supplied and they could get squared

around, and nothing would happen, and everything would be very

calm in the countryside, and it could be plundered at will, and

people would just sit there in the castle you see, and wait to be

eaten up.  And maybe the castle could defend itself, but there is

no time limit on how long a besieger who has full run of the

countryside can beseige.



So those castles became unbesieged, which themselves would spend

about fifty percent of their time holding the castle, and the

other fifty percent just raising hell with the besiegers.  How'd

they do this?  They'd have sally force, small group of men slide

out in the middle of the night, and the next thing you know, why,

eighty baggage wagons go up in smoke.  And then there's a small

group of cavalry go out, and they just cut the communication

lines to pieces.  Then the next thing you know, the besiegers are

besieged on the other side, and they're caught in between by a

fairly sizable force, one way or the other.  And boy, it got real

random.



Siege warfare is an interesting study, mostly because it has

ceased to exist almost, and it appears to be an entirely new

picture.  But what do you know, our old pal, our old pal Hitler

didn't know anything about siege warfare.  He decided that you

could neglect arms posts; he decided you could neglect force.

And he did with great success, because he was fronting generals

who didn't know how to use them.  And then as the war progressed,

the boys realized what he was doing, so they started specializing

in siege warfare and a few other things like that, and the great

warmachs were naught.  You know?  He just took armed points and

that sort of thing, and just cut his communications and

everything else to ribbons.  And so this huge machine depended

entirely for attacking and no protection, oh boy.  It lost.



In any game of life that'll happen.  If in business you simply

were to sit still and take only the inflow, and never do an

outflow, you'd starve in a very short space of time.  So we get

this whole picture of balanced flows, which this universe has so

pat.  Outflow, inflow.  And a good game is fifty percent outflow

and fifty percent inflow.



Now you get a preclear to come along, and the preclear will say

to you, "You know, I outflow all the time, and that makes it

possible for me to hold off and defend myself, one way or the

other."  Huh-uh.  You won't find him in very good shape.  We'd

call this a stuck flow or something of the sort.



This fellow must have some ability to attack in order to protect.

Just to protect he has to attack.  So the fellow who says, "I'm

going to sit still the rest of my life and have tea," has just

signed his own death warrant.  You see why he has?  He's still

going to be in this universe.  Well, there's your problem with a

preclear is how much can he defend.  The other part of the

problem is how much is he trying to.  And that gets to be grim.



If Japan had not fallen when Japan fell, Japan could have won the

war in the next wave.  Because Japan spread herself all over the

Pacific in such a way as to convince the US forces into a raiding

force, then it became elementary to roll up the Japanese from

island to island.  Became elementary.  Why?  Because Japan was

spread all over the islands, of course.  Well now, all things

being equal and atom bombs aside, and if the somewhat like

manufacturing abilities had been more of a parity between the

two, by the time the US had rolled up Japan back onto the home

island, she theoretically would have left a very heavy raiding

force, very compact, which could still have raised hell with the

US forces.  And we could have gotten this where first the US is

spread all over the Pacific, Japan rolls them up with a raiding

force.  Then, the US is all compact now, so it rolls up all these

Japanese spread all over the Pacific.  Then the recurring wave of

that, if it hadn't had been for the amount of destruction which

was done, would have been simply for Japan to now be compact, and

come back and roll up all the forces it had left, having been

buttered all over the Pacific.  So we get your give and take,

back and forth.



Now your preclear's gotten himself spread out all over the

universe, one time or another, and he's still got fixed ideas

about what he's trying to defend all over the track.  And, our

problem with such a preclear who is quote, buttered all over the

universe, is that this individual has recognized his failure to

protect on practically every playing field with which he has a

communication.  And he's in communication with playing fields

rather than knowing about playing fields.  He's in communication

with other planets.  He's in communication with all sorts of

things.  Fixed.  And you'll find such a preclear with enormous

corded communication lines wrapped all around him and everything

else, he's long on communication and very short on being able to

protect and defend.



Well when you look at the fact that his beingness, his beingness

is as good as he can grant beingness to other things, if he has

the idea he has to protect everything to which he has granted

beingness or is granting beingness, if he then has to protect it,

he isn't going to grant beingness to anything.  And so we get a

pattern of case, and this is a patterned case.  You'll find this

case many times.  He's buttered all over the place.  You ask him

where he is not, or where he's not thinking or something like

that, and he has a difficulty in telling you.  Great difficulty,

great communication lags on the thing.



Well you say, "Alright, now be the bed."  He can't be the bed.

It's the same thing.  He has the idea that if he is anything,

then he has to protect it, and he knows he can't protect

anything.  And what you call an apathy case would be a fellow who

not only can't attack, but can't defend either.  So we get this

thing rolling up in this fashion.  A fellow starts out about, he

starts out all attack.  A hundred percent attack.  And then he

gets some things to hold to, and that breaks down gradually 'til

he's fifty percent attack and fifty percent protecting the things

he holds.  Now he gets so many things to hold he figures there's

a scarcity of an ability to attack.  He figures there's a

scarcity of attention, you see?  And he starts down to a point

where he's only defending now, he's gone up to about a hundred

percent defense, and then that comes down the line to less and

less defense.  They're still his, but he's not defending them.



And this rolls on back to where he's only defending fifty percent

of what he has.  And he's only defending twenty percent, and ten

percent, and here's where you start into your apathy case par

excellence.  Next thing you know he only has a body.  And that's

all he can grant any being to, and that's all he can defend.

Well boy, the thetan that only owns a body is in horrible

condition.  He won't be able to get mock-ups or anything else.

He can't get a mock-up of things which are not his, or things

which will not potentially be his.  So, we get this problem of

invested beingness of communication, of identity pretty well

wrapped up.  You see that?  See how it could deteriorate?



Now it would start out of course at a higher echelon than I gave

it.  It'd start out just knowing about things and not attacking

anything.  And he'd have to split the universe into two halves,

the blues and the greens, before he could really engage in any

kind of a random game.  His knowingness at that moment would have

to drop to fifty percent.  See that?



So actually there is really just an intellectual philosophy that

goes along right with this is how would you lead a peaceful life?

Well there is a way to lead a peaceful life, know all there is to

know about everything on the process of being able to be

everything.  Now you could know all there is to know about

everything in terms of symbols and data, but be unwilling to be

anything.  And you'd be at the bottom of a scale, because you'd

be dealing exclusively in symbols.  You wouldn't be dealing in

real beingness.



But life has a mechanism which solves this.  After a body is

ditched, dead, why, the thetan says, "OK.  Now I'm on a no

ownership, no attack basis," and he doesn't know much but he's

got some kind of a system, and he just jettisons all this.  You

know, just cuts the communication lines as nearly as he can, and

he grabs this next body and he says, "Now I have that force which

is, potentially can attack everything, and own everything."

Pardon me, me says at first it can own everything.  A little baby

owns everything.  And then he gets along to a point where he can

attack everything, then he's into his teens.  And then he goes

from there into defending family, he's got a unit he has to

defend, he can't attack any further, and then he sort of starts

to fall back and he can't even defend his family, and he gets

back to a standard homo sapiens.  There's your banker usually,

your drug clerk, your bus driver, and so forth.  He really, he'd

have a little bit of a hard time defending his body, truth be

told.  You ask him very closely about it, he'd tell you there

were quite a few things that could knock in his body.  Well

that's a funny state of mind to be in, you know?  The body

shouldn't be the last point of ownership.



Now you ask the fellow to exteriorize from this, exteriorize into

what?  Into where?  Well he's on a, he's defending, he's

defending the small area immediately ahead of ...



[end of lecture]



[The following notes on the final section of this lecture are from 

the ACC notes (published 1955) of Alphia Hart, D. Scn. who attended

this ACC.  These are notes rather than a complete transcript.  We

begin with the notes corresponding to the last paragraph above]



Ask him to exteriorize from this and you're asking him to give

up all that he as left to defend - a little spot in the head.



The MEST universe communicates with you billions to one over

that with human beings.  An individual sold on the idea he is

a symbol can't protect anything - because he can't be the other

force.



An individual who is shipped is trying to protect by being ugly

and abhorrent.  He's unable to attack, and his defense is

covert.  A blind man knows he can't defend his body, so fixes

the body up so nobody will want it.



Most preclears hard to exteriorize are afraid of others being

them.  He starts out wanting others to be him and winds up

afraid they will be.



To run beingness on a preclear not willing to be anything

but himself, keep racking around until you can find something

he's willing to be.  Have him be it, then himself - and when

he can be that thing, find something else he can be.  If a

person can't be the beingness of something, he can't know

much about it.  Even cars have geingness - granted beingness

by their manufacturer.  A person who can BE a car can pervade

it and keep it in working order.



You can deteriorate the inclinations of anything by consistently

being it.



To make the world bright to somebody: LOOK!



[The following, included here in Alphia's notes but separately

titled might have been part of the above lecture or might be from

something else given on the same day]



INCIDENTS OF A PSYCHOTIC BREAK



Don't audit when the preclear is tired, or sleepy, or if it's

late.  Check to see if he's having nightmares, and if he is,

give him B1.  It's best taken in milk.  Fifty milligrams is

necessary, but 200 is better.



If the guy has "jelly legs", you've keyed in gravity.  It

doesn't help to run it out because you're running the GE.

Give him a slug of B1.  You've hit the thetan agreement line

with the genetic agreement line.



Also, check up on what he's eating.



Changing auditors is bad.



These are 1950 rules - and they're still important.  If you

don't step outside these rules, you can do almost anything to

a preclear.  And if an auditor pays attention to these rules,

he'll probably have little trouble.



Protein is no longer a factor to make them spin or not spin.

You probably could eat yourself thin, but not diet yourself

thin.  Wounds heal on a protein diet - not on carbohydrates.



[end of notes]



****************************