From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Mon Jul 12 19:19:38 1999

Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!feeder.qis.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!kiowa!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news

Date: 13 Jul 1999 02:19:38 -0000

Subject: FZ BIBLE 1/11 MORE 3RD ACC TAPES (1954)

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

Message-ID: <79372685b4816ed4313a09b7372ac688@anonymous.poster>

Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to

	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity

	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.

From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net

Lines: 997

Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:864130 alt.clearing.technology:90516





FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



FZ BIBLE 1/11 MORE 3RD ACC TAPES (1954)



**************************************************



Here are another 11 of the 3rd ACC (Advanced Clinical Course)

lectures of early 1954.



These are based on existing freezone transcripts.  We had 2 of

the reels (3ACC-04 and 3ACC-63) which we used for a second proof 

to ensure the accuracy.  We did not have reels for the remaining 9 

(they must exist in the freezone somewhere because they were 

transcribed).  There are some problems with the transcripts

for 3ACC-23 and 3ACC-41, as noted in those files and if anyone

does have these tapes, please verify these transcripts.



In all cases, we also consulted Alphia Hart's notes on the

3RD ACC which were taken during the lectures and any descrepancies

or missing sections have been marked.



3rd ACC lectures 24, 25, 32, 35, 42, and 66 were posted

earlier this year as "FZ BIBLE 0/6 SOME 3RD ACC TAPES (1954)"



3rd ACC Lectures 6A, 6B, 8, and 44 were posted last year

and reposted earlier this year.



We are sorry to be issuing this ACC in bits and pieces but

NONE of these lectures have been available from the Cof$

for many years and we are finding them a few at a time amoung

old timers in the freezone.





**************************************************



CONTENTS:



1.  3ACC-04 BOREDOM, PACE OF LIVING, TRUTH

2.  3ACC-07 PROCESSING DEMO: RANDOMITY PLUS AUTOMATICITY

3.  3ACC-23 LABELS:  BEINGNESS AND JUSTICE, CONT.

4.  3ACC-37 LIVINGNESS PROCESSING SERIES (DYINGNESS)

5.  3ACC-40 GOALS OF 8-O (OT) ABILITIES

6.  3ACC-41 BASIC DATA ON 8-O (OT)

7.  3ACC-43 O.T., INVERSION: COURAGE AND MOBILITY

8.  3ACC-57 GROUP PROCESSING ON CERTAINTY, 8 DYNAMICS

9.  3ACC-59 GROUP PROCESSING, AUTOMATICITIES

10. 3ACC-63 GROUP PROCESSING ON CLASS - BEING MEST

11. 3ACC-67 GROUP PROCESSING ON CLASS:  RESIST EFFECT



Jan to early Feb 1954.



**************************************************



STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************

 

3ACC-04 BOREDOM, PACE OF LIVING, TRUTH



[Freezone transcript directly from the old reels, proofed again

before posting]



BOREDOM, PACE OF LIVING, TRUTH



5401C05  3ACC-4





This is the afternoon lecture of the second day of the second

unit and this is January the fifth, 1954.  And today, right away

quick here, we're going to give you an example of Opening

Procedure just so that you know what it is, and if your auditor

does something else, why, that's what your auditor's doing.  You

got that now?  It's what your auditor's doing, that's the answer,

because any such technique is very often varied a little bit here

and there for randomity.  The worse, worser variations, the more

difficult ones of ... (loud noise)  Too bad, too bad that you

could just sound that at that moment, boom!  (laughter)



Anyway, the worse fault in varying a technique is making it more

complicated.  The only reason you vary a technique is to vary the

monotony.  You say it another way, you do something else or you

throw something else in, not to startle the preclear but to keep

him from going mad with boredom.  Now, the funny part of it is,

that if you're going to handle boredom, don't handle it by being

a boring auditor.  You just start in and handle duplication.



And how do you handle duplication?  Well, you just do Step 8 of

SOP-8C, and you just do it and you do it preferably in a

monotonous tone of voice, and you do it in the same place and you

don't vary it at all, and you just do what you do and you keep on

doing it, and the fellow begins to say, "I can't do it anymore

because if I do it just one more time I just..."  You say,

"Duplicate it again."  And he says, "  Oh, mfmf mfmf."



The first thing you know, the reason why the fellow cannot stay

in one place, the reason why he is afraid of remaining on a place

on the track, the reason why he is stuck on a place on the track

is because he's afraid he'll remain on a place on the track.  You

see that?  What he fears, he becomes.  What he resists, he walks

into.  All of these things add up to the reason why he's stuck on

the track and why he has to change space hectically in life,

that's why he can't remember 'cause if he can't stay in the same

place, he certainly can't get the same datum again.  It's why he

has to be entertained and amused, it's why he finds life

uninteresting, and all the rest of it, and it all remains to the

fact that he conceives it dangerous to repeat.  He conceives it

both dangerous to repeat and to be repeated. 



(loud whirring noise) Where's that fan?  Switch off the blower...

Let's turn it off.  (short break in tape) 



..thinking here is that duplication is to get rid of boredom.

And we don't use auditing to get rid of boredom, because that

doesn't, that just restimulates it.  If you're going to get rid

of boredom, or if the case gets frantically bored or he gets very

upset or he doesn't want to do it twice or he doesn't want to

repeat the technique or he has a lot of protest against repeating

the technique, why don't you get smart and just shift to Step 8

SOP-8C and do it?



Now, how can you do that visibly with a body?  You say, "Alright,

choose a place and put your finger on it."  OK, he does that.

You say, "Alright, choose another place and put your finger on

that."  He does that.  After he's done this fifty times, he'll be

running out of places, without standing up, to put his finger on.

And he gets that same frantic feeling.



Now you can do, in other words, duplication with a body but it's

making him duplicate the same act again.  You could theoretically

take a preclear and have him stand up and have him, have him

take his hat and have him put his hat on and take it off, and

then put his hat on and take it off, and put his hat on and take

it off.  And you would begin to hit right straight toward the

center of one of the ugliest, nastiest sensations an individual

can get, and you will run it right straight through and on out.

And all of a sudden he'll be perfectly willing to stand there and

put his hat on and take it off, not because he's an idiot, but

because he conceives all of a sudden that repeating a motion

won't kill him.  He gets happy about it.



The only reason people are afraid of repeating the motions, the

only reason why they have to have everything new, the only reason

why they can't enjoy life, which actually isn't composed of a lot

of new things but it's composed of pretty much the same thing,

the reason they can't enjoy life is because they don't have

enough new things or enough drama or something, that's all "can't

remain in the same place."  That's because places get dangerous

which means the preclear is no longer dangerous to the

environment, the environment is now dangerous to the preclear.

And so, he has to run and he has to go away and he has to come

here and do there, and on with this and he's off of this point

and onto that point and around the block and, and somewhere, and

he's got to leave and he can't stay.  Well, that means also he

must forget, he can't remember, because remembering is bringing

something to you and forgetting is putting it away from you.  So

if you have to resist forgetting something, then you remember it

and when you have to resist remembering it, you have to forget it

and, you know, I mean it, it just gets too unutterably scrambled.

All from what?  The fellow can't be in the same place.



Now, when we get to the second Dynamic, we find out that this

goes so far as inhibiting the individual from procreating or

enjoying the sexual act.  And it goes even further than that, it

inhibits him from enjoying children.  Children to him become too

much motion, too much noise, everything, everything, everything,

but actually basically he just can't duplicate.  He can't have a

kid, so the kid's a very upsetting child.  He just can't have a

child.  So he wants to stop the motion of the child, which is to

say kill the child.  What's the gradient scale of killing a

child?  Stopping its motion.  Stopping its noise.  Do you follow

me very closely there?



Now, that all comes from duplication.  And what basically is

duplication?  It would be making the same space twice, that would

be duplicating or, in any other way, the same geographical set-up

twice.  And a man who has been taught to run away then gets all

sorts of squirrely notions.  They become very peculiar and he

becomes very peculiar in his thinkingness because he can't

remember what he wants to remember, and he can't forget what he

wants to forget.  The biggest trick there is, if you will look

over 16G, you will find is "it's so bad over there."  Well,

people start him running, he thinks, by telling him it's so bad

over there.  Well, if he can't stay in the same place he can't

duplicate.  If he can't duplicate, he hasn't got the eight

Dynamics.



So, what happens when this individual starts to get frantic and

bored?  This is all we're talking about right now, we're not

talking about anything else but your preclear in the session

which you are about to commence upon, we're talking about your

preclear being bored.  What you do if your preclear's getting too

frantically bored, you get more repetitive.  Calm, gentle, non-

argumentative, as far as you're concerned, but get repetitive.

And the cruellest thing you could do is to get repetitive and

then forbear, and say, "Well, this is getting too much for him.

After all, I haven't got the right to bore him like this."  Well,

that's just YOU not wanting to get the restimulation of boredom

yourself.  So you just not-look and you want to run away, too.

So, one of the first things you will solve in all cases present,

and what you should really try to concentrate on in group

auditing is just that. 



By the way, there's an old Chinese legend, just to get colorful

here this afternoon a little bit, there's an old Chinese legend

which is an interesting one.  It has to do with a young man who

decided to learn.  We've kind of turned cycle on this here just

for an instant on this one point.  There's a lot more to

duplication, but, where it goes and so forth.  But there was a

young man and he was raised on a farm in China and he, all the

years of his early life, he wanted to be trained by a great

philosopher.  And he'd heard of this wise man and this wise man

was at some distance away.  And the young man, by much pleading,

finally got his family to let him go and study under this very

wise man.  And when he got there, he introduced himself and the

fellow took him over to the forge.  It was a, it was a big

blacksmith's shop, and there were all kinds of pupils there and

so on, and they were all doing blacksmithing of one kind or

another.  And so the teacher, the philosopher, took him over and

put his hand on the bellows cord and by pulling this cord, you

kept air going into the forge, and he didn't say another word to

him and he just motioned him to continue pulling the bellows

cord.  And a year went by and the young man was still standing

there, you know, he was just doing this until he could get a

chance to speak to the great philosopher, and he started to say

something and the philosopher waved him back to the bellows cord.

And in such a way, although he tried every few months, he just

never got a word in edgewise and he spent seven years pulling

this bellows cord up and down.  At the end of that time, why, the

philosopher came over to him and he says to him, "Young man, you

have now learned the greatest lesson that man can know and that

is patience.  You are now graduated."



Right, but there's one thing about that I want to call your

attention to very much.  You're not pulling parallel, don't think

I'm giving it to you for that reason.  I want to point to you a

hole in the philosophic structure of Earth, Galaxy 61, and I just

want to point to you a nice big hole in its philosophy.  You have

to learn patience, which is learn repetitive motion, on an apathy

basis.  Obviously, a repetitive motion is something you have to

force yourself to put up with, so that makes you fight a

repetitive motion until you yourself discipline yourself until

you will endure it.  And this is the exact curve in how somebody

gets into endurance and into the effort band.  He learns

patience.  The hell with learning patience!



Get the big difference here because you're going to get this with

the preclear and you're going to find this in the preclear's

bank, you're going to find some semblance of the story I just

told you.  If he's in the effort band, some time or another, he

has busily learned patience.  You don't even vaguely care about

his learning patience.  What the devil has patience got to do

with being able to duplicate on eight Dynamics prolifically,

endlessly and in all directions, huh?  Not a thing.  And so we're

right on the center booby trap of all religious and philosophic

training of Earth, Galaxy 61.  Here we are.



That's the major thing that has, that really has interrupted

philosophic progress.  You had to have patience to study

philosophy, which enforced patience upon you by its verbosity.

You had to have patience to learn and wait and watch and observe.

You just had to discipline yourself until you could endure enough

training or enough experience, and endure long enough so that you

could then live.  And all perfection and all schools of thought

begin with patience and so, you've got your poor preclear,

anybody in this room to some degree slightly, is going forward

toward self-perfection, out of the enormous volcano of criticism

leveled against him, down through the ages.  He has come to

believe that there, he has to do something before he can engage

upon something else.  That's the biggest lesson he's learned.  He

has to prepare to go.



The Boy Scouts of America and the UK have the motto, "Be

prepared."  Boy Scouts are a wonderful organization.  The fellow

who chose that motto for them ought to be kicked.  Their motto

ought to be "Live," not "be prepared to live," because they're

right there in the middle period of their livingness.  There's

the most vivid imagination, there is their biggest action, there

is their most joy of eating, here's everything suddenly turned on

full and somebody says they've got to be prepared.  To what?

Live.  So they keep expecting they're going to live some time or

another, so they never get started living.  So, the biggest

philosophical booby trap is, "Well now, alright, we'll teach you

how to live someday, but first you must learn patience."

ECNEITAP, you learn to spell it backwards, you learn it so well

that you know it backwards or forwards.



I don't know if any of you know of many of the cults of Earth as

such, but all their trainings go in toward a self-discipline

which is some effort to put the individual into some kind of a

state without kind of telling him about it first, see, in which

he can be relatively easily controlled, and they give to him the

goal of self-perfection.  The mystic is hard for the auditor to

handle because the mystic will sit there endlessly going forward

on the goal of self-preparation.  For what?  Never occurs to him

to live.  Do you see that?  We've got self-preparation, self-

perfection, and these things are learned by expressing, in one

way or another, long study, which is another way of saying

patience.  So we got patience and we got endurance all mixed up

with survival.  And the cases that are in the effort band are

enduring.  The only reason you find a communication lag there is

because the fellow has learned to wait.  He's learned to think

twice before speaking once.  He has learned all sorts of odds and

ends of bric-a-brac which mean slow down, slow down, and when he

slows down enough, he'll be dead.



Now, what we're trying to do is speed up, speed up, speed up

enough so that a guy will live.  And if there is any confusion in

your mind as an auditor or preclear which direction we're going,

let's resolve it right now.  We're going on opposite vectors, and

when you suddenly glom on, to be colloquial, to the, some datum

in Scientology, and you say that this is a parallel to something

or other, be careful that you aren't getting a parallel a hundred

and eighty degrees different direction.  Now, you examine things

from that standpoint, and you'll have a much closer grip both on

what you're doing and on beingness itself.  You see that?  We've

got a hundred and eighty degree vector.  We say "live" and we're

trying to go toward more life, more motion and a greater ability

to create energy and the substances of games.  We're not trying

to go in the direction of creating the, a big control set-up so

the game can't be played quite so fast, so that we can keep up

with it, too.  That's a sort of a little kid attitude you know,

let's get the game a little slower so we can play, too.



Well, there've been too many disabled players around talking to

us for some time trying to get us to run a little slower, so

let's run a little faster.  Well, it may mean that we come out at

the top, running more or less our own game.  It might even mean

that if we don't concentrate on it and keep it manned a little

bit, it might mean that we'll completely run away from an awful

lot of the broken pieces which we set out to have set to rights,

and, all of a sudden, we'll have a game and we'll be using those

broken pieces in that game with perfect aplomb.  Well, that's too

bad.



But it's time some livingness entered the universe again or it's

time some universe un-entered this universe or it's time

something happened, in other words.  This change of survival is

actually a change of pace.  So, we're not trying to indoctrinate

our preclear toward an endurance of anything that comes up, to

harden him so that he can be indifferent to life, so that the

things which are said to him in anger and meanness will not

effect him anymore.  No, we want them to effect him a LOT more.

We want things said to him in anger and meanness to effect him

right straight up like you'd effect a, a pile of cotton-soaked

gasoline.  We don't necessarily indoctrinate him as to how it

should effect him, but we want to give him at once the ability

not to be effected and to be effected at will.  So this is,

hasn't anything to do, then, with training in some kind of a

protective screen, does it?  It doesn't have anything to do with

this screen business whereby we fend everything off.  That hasn't

anything to do with, with "Let's protect ourselves, we're all

delicate.  If we're very careful we won't die." 



And neither does processing or duplication have anything to do

with patience.  I told you that story because it's a classic.

And that's in its earliest form and that form appeared

approximately 4800 years ago, in Tungsharng.  Alright.



Where are we going, then, with duplication, because one of the

first things you're going to do is hit monotony.  Monotony is a

great study, it outranks algebra.  The thing to do with it is

don't play with it, the thing to do is to run it out.  When your

preclear starts to show the stress and strain and he begins to

sigh a little bit, and he feels that this session is awfully damn

dull, and really, during the session, you as an auditor tried to

be entertaining, you know, and it,  it's pretty dull.  What's he

running into?



Well, during the war an awful lot of young men had a lot of fun.

They went around carrying guns and shooting people and getting

shot at and a lot of them didn't consider it a lot of fun but

whatever they considered it, they were in a high state of motion.

There's nothing like getting threatened with death at least three

times a day to keep somebody in present time.  But then all of a

sudden nobody's threatening you with death three times a day.

Nyao.  No, it's just, the guy's out of gear.  You wonder what's

wrong with the veteran's hospital down here?  Well, add it up

that way.  Add it up just this way and have pretty well the right

answer.  Why is it the right answer?  Not because I say so,

because it works. 



And that is, the same phenomena's noticed on a battlefield.  The

infantryman is shot, he's drug back to a first- aid station, a

first-aid man looks at him, notices the bone is clipped, notices

he's in pretty bad shape, loss of blood and so forth, and yet, he

throws a pint of plasma into him and he winds him up, he bandages

him up, he sews him up and, by golly, there's such a heck of a

roar and push on that they, they just can't even maintain really

the perimeter of the first aid-station.  And this infantryman,

completely forgotten about, goes into the action again.  He's

right back there swapping bullets left and right, bang, bang,

thud, crash, grenades, charge, counter-charge and bombings.  And

about two months later, somebody picks him up and says, "Say, you

should have been sent back to base hospital, it's here on your

record."  Well, he isn't doing too well but he's doing alright.

He was doing OK, he was carrying his pack, one of his pals helped

him out a bit, and he kind of got himself dragged over the mud

and he got himself fed, and he did a lot of fighting in that

period.  But they look him over and, by golly, the wound is

healed and he has no, as the Freudians used to call it, "psychic

trauma."  He doesn't have one.  What happened to it?  Alright.



Now, let's take this fellow, he comes in, he falls over the door

jamb at headquarters while carrying a hot water bottle for the

captain and barks his shins.  He is immediately rushed over to a

first-aid station, they put a bandage on the shins, there happens

to be an ambulance going out at that moment, so they throw him

into the ambulance, take him back to base hospital.  Base

hospital, he's there for two months, he has developed an

infection of the shin, although it's been wrapped in clean

bandages, and he has a slight quote "psychic trauma." 



What's the matter with this boy?  What's the difference between

these two cases?  This by the way is, I'm talking straight out of

clinical records now, I'm not talking out of hazy this or that.

This has been the most ASTOUNDING thing to medicine.  Why is it

nobody went crazy during the Battle of Britain?  Everybody had

every reason to go crazy and nobody went crazy, nobody took time

off, also the suicide rate dropped to nothing.  Well, it's just

we had enough commotion to suit anybody's palate, and we didn't

have anybody studying for self-improvement, all we had was

action.  And we didn't have anybody able to lie around the base

hospital and study his shin.  Never had a chance to, so here we

went.  Nobody went crazy.



Well, where patience has entered into it, endurance and no

duplication, do you actually concede that there is a great deal

of difference toward jumping up on a stone wall and firing a

rifle at four o'clock, and jumping up on a stone rifle at six

o'clock and firing a rifle?  Think there's much difference

between these two things?  Do you think there's much difference

in being on green beach one and throwing a flock of grenades into

a pill box, and being on green beach two and throwing a flock of

grenades into a pill box two hours afterwards?  No there sure

isn't.  There's nothing like the monotony of being shot at.  It's

very monotonous, but it's terrifically attention getting, and

your attention comes off of the things which just shot you very

rapidly.  That is to say, you know, if somebody shot at you and

now somebody else is shooting at you, well you just don't have

time to invest this attention.  And attention isn't particularly

scarce, it gets more and more plentiful really.  There's nothing

more aware than a combat soldier.



Now, he gets all geared up to where he knows where every driver

on every automobile is within five blocks of him, he's really

geared up.  In other words, his knowingness has had to step up,

his necessity level, he knows all over the block.  Why is it that

of the last forty soldiers of the regiment become unkillable?

This is also a clinical fact, they become unkillable people.

Why?  Well, they know where the bullets are of course, I mean

there's, let's not be obtuse about the answer, let's just throw

that one in as the answer.  Well, they know where the bullets are

going, and they aren't there.  Well, that's obviously the answer

because they're unkillable.  And yet you throw, you throw in with

these forty guys who started out in 1914, you had thrown in by

this time at least twelve thousand men as replacements that have

gone through this regiment, and you've still got the forty.  One

of them has dropped out because he's been made a captain.  This

is the kind of silliness that goes on.



Well, his training level came up, he, they call him all sorts of

things, "survivor type."  There's an awfully good phrase by the

way, it came out of Poland, a "survivor type."  Anyway, what's,

what's the difference then between one pitch of existence and

another pitch of existence?  Well, I hate to have to give you

this answer but it's the pitch of existence, that's what's the

difference.  And the individual who is unable to change, from one

pitch of existence to another pitch of existence, is actually

unable to duplicate.  You see, here's...  Now, that sounds non-

sequitur, doesn't it?  But what a person resists, he gets trapped

in.  So if a person resists the duplication like mad, eventually

he gets into obsessive, compulsive duplication of something,

doesn't he?  So, that puts him into a state where he can't

change.  Well, he's got to duplicate the last minutes that

happened and he's got to keep on duplicating minutes and

duplicating minutes.  Well, you can move him artificially in

there by making him patient.



You can get him into a state of mind where he will not duplicate

by his own volition but will duplicate obsessively, just by

teaching him carefully that he must learn patience and endure and

wait.  And if we teach him these things, then we've got him in a

state of where he can't change his level of survival.  So, the

only difference between the soldier in the first-aid station and

the soldier in the base hospital is the soldier in the first-aid

station wasn't even vaguely asked to change his level of

survival.  Now, it sounds dramatic that this was happening, but

we've never, we always look at the dramatic and avoid the

important.  The soldier in the base hospital who was assigned

there for guard duty, does all right, month in and month out.

And when wounded in the base hospital by a nurse dashing out of

surgery with scissors in her hands, recovers quite normally and

uniformly right in the base hospital, but wouldn't even vaguely

be able to recover well in that first-aid station up there at the

first lines, after having been wounded in the base hospital.



Just look at this, the two ways now, instead of looking at it

dramatically the way it appears in the, in the Army medical

record books.  The Army medical record book only cites the case

of a soldier in combat who is wounded and is then shipped back to

the base hospital and then doesn't heal up.  But the soldier

wounded in combat, pitched up in the first-aid station with

practically the same wound and shoved back into combat again,

survives very well and lives and doesn't develop any quote

"psychic trauma."  They don't give you the other case.  The

soldier wounded in the base hospital, they can state it this way,

the soldier wounded in the base hospital, you know, he's wounded

by a nurse's shears or he drops his gun butt on his toe standing

out at the gate as he hastily starts to salute a new second

lieutenant, knowing how vicious they are about salutes and, and

they throw him in an ambulance and ship him to the first-aid

station next to the front, to recover.  Well, they don't cover

this case, mostly because they don't do it.  There's no flow

going from the base hospital to the front, it's all from the

front to the base hospital.



So, they just completely overlook the matched data.  So make sure

you don't start overlooking matched data, too.  Change of

survival level, it tells you that these people have had their

survival pitch, pace, let's call it a survival pace, huh?

Alright.  He's had his survival pace changed on him radically,

whether he was shipped from the calm base hospital with hot and

cold running nurses, to the front, or from the hectic front back

to the base hospital.  Either way he's had his survival pace

shifted at a critical moment and this shift at the critical

moment has, of course, wound him up with a quote "psychic trauma"

because somebody, in a moment when he's rather unable to, has

asked him to change pace.



Well, this sudden moment when he can't change pace, he's, it's

been demanded of him that he change pace and he can't change

pace.  Well, that's survival pace.  So, a person and your

preclear will obsessively go on at the survival pace he's going

on at, if duplication isn't solved on him.  He only has a

survival pace because he obsessively is duplicating exactly what

has happened before.  You see, it's an obsession with him that

things have got to be the same.  This is his training.  It's

also, it sometimes becomes an obsession with him that while he is

busily maintaining things just exactly the same, he's talking all

the time about having to change things.  And that is your average

preclear.  He's working madly all the time to remain and retain

the same survival pace, while talking about shifting it.  He

wants a change of existence and so forth, but he's madly, he's

keeping on at the same survival pace he's been on for years.  He

isn't going to get any change of pace.  Why?  Well, because you,

by changing his pace, are risking him, you're, you're kind of

shifting him back to the hospital one way or the other.



(glitch in tape) ...one time when you lay a trauma into a preclear

and that is when you get him in a moment when he's a bit down, in

other words, unconscious or something of the sort, and suddenly

change his pace or change the process you're using on him,

suddenly and without explanation.  And you'll leave him hung

right there and I'll come around afterwards wondering why this

guy has run into the wall three times while he's trying to leave

the class room, and we will go straight back to change of

auditing, change of space in auditing rooms, and we'll suddenly

find out that the auditor has gotten him three-quarters

unconscious and has suddenly changed auditing pace.  That's all

that's happened to him.  There is nothing more deeply significant

than that about a case hung up in an auditing session, or the

auditor started to explain something to him.



You see, the auditor, it doesn't matter what, how you change the

pace, the auditor can change the pace this way.  There's the

preclear, he's doing alright, he's quite alert.  The auditor

shifts to another process, shifts to another process, does two

processes wrong, goes out the wrong end of the technique, makes

three errors, shifts again, comes back, stumbles, gives three

commands without getting one obeyed, and the preclear survives

all this very beautifully, with no change of pace.  See, I mean,

he's just got more or less the same kind of stuff going on and

he's just slightly alert for it, but he's aware.  It's, it's no

change of pace to him, because he's just sitting there, he's

doing these things, he is aware, he's perfectly able to adjust to

these shifts and changes.  See, it isn't anything radical that's

happened to him, no, because it didn't surprise him or take him

unawares.  Now, he can only be taken unawares when he's unaware.

See, he's unaware, so he's only taken unawares when he's unaware.

Alright.



Let's get this fellow to a point of where he's doping off with a

comm-lag which has suddenly stretched out to about forty-five

seconds, which is good and plenty.  And this good long comm lag,

you say yes, and you say, "What did you say?"  And you get forty-

five seconds later what he said, the second time.  I mean, he

actually isn't answering the question directly, except with a

forty-five second lag.  And now all of a sudden you, you've just

been processing, "Give me three people you are not.  Now let's

have somebody else getting three people that he is not."  You've

been going along like this all right.  Now he's got him with a

forty-five second comm-lag, he was quite alert for a while and

then he sunk on this one.  And now, all of a sudden, we say,

"Alright, now let's put up eight points of space around you.  And

now let's have somebody else putting up eight points of space

around you."  And he heard you about the third time, see, that

you, you're about three commands deep.



Now the preclear is in a total state of confusion.  The technique

has changed on him, something else has altered and shifted on

him, and he's waking up in a different world.  He's either on the

front lines or base hospital, but he was in the other place just

before this happened.  And, he'll stick.  This should tell you a

lot about the human psyche, and it tells you that a human psyche

that is well aware doesn't have much happen to it, and a human

psyche that isn't aware has an awful lot of things happen to it.

Automobile goes by, it's a lock.  Yeah, I mean, you will find

preclears around like this, an automobile goes by and it's a

lock.  He steps on a crack on the sidewalk, this is no

significance to you, but he goes home and weeps that night about

it.  You wouldn't necessarily think this fellow's crazy, I mean,

he might be going on doing business down at some corporation and

so forth.  But as a little kid, why, he just never stepped on

cracks because that was bad luck and now he knows he'll have bad

luck, and he can't figure out the future for himself anymore so

he has to depend upon omens, and he doesn't dare tell anybody

about it because he's just in terrible condition. You'll be

surprised how many guys that walk around like that.  Alright.



Change of pace is the keynote of what you are doing.  You want to

change HIS pace.  Well, you won't do it by shifting the devil out

of yours, so, audit at a good smooth rate and change the

technique when he is alert.  We'll save more preclears this way.

(Is that equally true in group processing?)  Yes, indeed.  That

is sure true, why thank you, that's very true in group

processing.  If you've got the whole group doped off, and

suddenly shift the technique on them, you've got the whole group

stuck.  It doesn't matter what the technique was or what they

doped off on, just let them dope off some more and keep giving it

to them 'til they alert.  Now, if you find the whole group is

pretty dopey and you've got to end the session, that's something

else.  You do it on a smoothly gradient scale, you give them a

little less of what you were doing and a little less.  You take

them on an easy ambulance trip to base hospital.  Don't give them

any, any strain or trouble on it.  OK.



Now, our main concern here is not necessarily with the preclear.

Our main concern is what you ought to be watching for when you're

training auditors.  So, you keep your eyes open, as you see this

go along and you'll see where duplication and survival pace fit

together, because they fit together very intimately.  They aren't

cousins, they're brothers.  Just figure out this way again, if

you resist that wall hard enough, you will become the wall.  You

got that?  You resist the wall hard enough, you'll become the

wall.  If you resist duplication hard enough, if it's always got

to be change, change, change, and you're resisting doing the same

thing, resisting doing the same thing, resisting doing the same

thing, you know, we mustn't have monotony, we mustn't have

monotony, why, we eventually wind up with a survival pace which

is unchangeable, practically.  Why?  Because we're going to get

an obsessive duplication and that is usually the state you find

the preclear in. 



And that is, incidentally, the state you find your auditor

trainee in, to a large degree.  He has been going along at a

certain pace level and he's been doing a certain combination of

errors in auditing, and now you're going to try to shift him out

of this rack of errors into at least a few less, or something of

the sort.  Well, you're trying to change his survival pace.



And again, this is, he's doing this.  You know, let's take some

fellow and teach him how to fly an airplane wrong, an awfully

good test, we teach him how to fly an airplane wrong.  We teach

him that the seat of the pants is the main thing to watch, and

that the air meter doesn't mean much, and that the seat of the

pants uniformly should have a little less, less pressure on the

left side than the right side.  Well, you know, by golly, you'll

pick up that fellow two or three years later and, by golly, he'll

still be flying the airplane that way, not because he wants to

but because he fought doing so when he finally noticed he was

doing it wrong and he fought it hard enough so that now he does

it.  That's a habit pattern, that's why it's unbreakable.  See,

the fellow fights it and then he closes terminals with it and

then he's got, he's in it and it's him, so of course he does it.

He obsessively has to BE it.



Well, with a preclear, you're trying to change his survival pace,

you try to pick him up to a point where he'll live, where he'll

breathe and everything.  That's what you want, you want him way

up and so, your problem is to change his survival pace upwards.

Well, every time you change pace on him suddenly while he's doped

off, you're going to change his page downwards.  So, the time to

change pace on him and to get speedier is when he's alert and

awake, that's when you shift pace.  That's when you, that's when

you start giving new razzle-dazzles and giving him terrific mock-

ups and big complications and once in a while slap him with a

failure, not because you want to but just because you just over-

estimated what he could do and so on.  That's the time to do

that.  The time to get real careful is when you start seeing him

go rararwarwraw.  Slow communication lag.  Now how, how fast will

they go into this kind of a thing with SOP-8C?  Well boy, it's

about the most beastly, butchery technique that you can get into.



Now, if you'll notice the, the congress there, I was auditing -

and don't hold myself up as the perfect model on this by any

manner or means, because standing up in front of a big group of

people, you're pacing against that group, you're not necessarily

making a tape that will be good for all groups for all time -

but if you'll notice, there's confoundedly little change of pace.

Darn little change of pace.  That's, but if you were to play the

first group auditing tape and the last group auditing tape side

by side, you would say, "By golly, what a different pace."  See,

there's big difference between those two paces.  Well now, after

everybody was awake and they'd gotten kind of line chargy and so

forth, I woke them up a little bit further by giving them

something funny to do, and a little postulate shifting and moving

around and so on, and gave them some animation.  But I woke them

up by moving.  See, I move myself and I move myself slowly and I

did it preparatory to the move, and then started moving a little

more rapidly and then finally got animated. 



My voice while I was moving was the same change of pace, and then

they finally swung into it and the whole audience woke up and got

brightened up quite a bit.  You watch this sort of thing

happening, you don't think there's any particular calculation

behind it.  As a matter of fact you do it, not on a feel or a

half sense thing, you just say, "Well, this is what I'm going to

do," and you do it.  There isn't anything calculating or hard or

arduous about anything, you just pace what you're doing against

who you're doing it to.



Now, every once in a while, somebody'll give you a good, smart

crack.  It's, "Well, what they're doing is auditing techniques,

not auditing a preclear."  Pick out a gun, preferably one of the

slower muzzle velocities, you know, that tear big holes slowly,

and drill them good because that's as most inadequate statement I

have ever heard.  It describes nothing.  Audit the technique

instead of the preclear, this is, this is just dopey.  It seems

to think, it seems to infer that people who know techniques,

thereby, in some strange fashion aren't auditing the preclear.

That's actually what it adds up to.  Or that if you do a

technique by rote it doesn't audit the preclear.  So let's put it

this way.  Let's audit, with techniques, the preclear.  And we've

got a better statement of it.



Now, there's an awful lot of hidden machinery sitting back of any

of these techniques, they cover an awfully, awful breadth of

span.  Well that isn't, that doesn't say to you, "Don't touch,

don't monkey with them," but normally they're monkeyed with to

your sorrow as an auditor.  The thing that you shouldn't be

watching right now is, however, the mechanic of the technique.

You shouldn't be watching this.  What you should be watching is

your performance as an auditor, as measured against the other

fellow's survival pace as a preclear.  You're going to change

that survival pace upward.  If you don't change it upward you

haven't done a thing.  Anybody can change it downward.  I can

show you how to change the pace, the survival level of a preclear

downward, much more easily than standing up here and talking to

you and giving you examples about auditing.  He walks in the

auditing room, you hit him over the head with a club, you change

it downward.  Well, that doesn't take much learning, easy and

fast.



Now, thereby and therefore, you should get some kind of an idea

of what's a good job of auditing.  What's really a good job of

auditing?  Oh, there's probably something mysterious about it,

you know?  Now, maybe you'd wave a magic wand, kind of, at the

end of the session or at the beginning of one.  What's this,

what's this terrific job of auditing?  Well, I'll tell you what a

terrific job of auditing is, and I can tell you very, very

simply.  A terrific job of auditing is a higher livingness in the

preclear, and that's all a terrific job of auditing is.  And if

you can do it better by being graceful, by being soft spoken, by

being pleasant, by being peppy, by being snappy, by being very

clever, by feeding him randomity, by interesting him in life by

the tremendous number of phenomena that you could suddenly yank

out of his brain and parade in front of him, however you do this,

you do it.



Now, it doesn't say that there's anything mysterious about doing

it, because the parts of the machine are lying right in front of

your eyes.  Here's an individual, you're trying to change his

survival, what we're calling now survival pace, OK?  You're

trying to change this survival pace without wrecking him, and the

way you change his survival pace is give him more awareness.  And

the only way you'd really give him more awareness is providing

his greater awareness doesn't produce more pain.  You know, you

know why people aren't aware?  It's because they, they'd hurt if

they were.  See that?  So, they've cut down their awareness and

they get tired of looking.  There's a whole host of processes

which dedicate themselves just to the rehabilitation of

lookingness, and you can take off people's glasses with them and

do all sorts of strange things with these processes.  They're not

necessarily part of any technique.



Now, I'm not asking you to put a technique away, or I'm not

asking you to be slavishly obedient to a technique, either way.

I'm asking you to do a job.  It's much easier from experience

which has gone by already to do that job with such a tool as SOP-

8C.  It's easier to do it, that's why SOP-8C is itself.  It's a

developed by experience and test and by theory, process.  It's

awfully close to theory, I mean, the technique itself is awfully

close to theory itself, right on down the groove.  So therefore,

that the closer a practice comes to theory and the more accurate

the theory is, why, the better things go.  So, we're making the

theory more accurate and closer and better stated, and the

process more closely approximating the theory, and suddenly it

starts to unwheel in front of your eyes.  Alright. 



We talk about technique, we talk about the deeper significance of

all this.  Right now, all I want you to, to really get is, is

just get yourself kind of oriented about "wither thou art going."

And it's just a nice, a nice thing to know that there is a point

of arrival, even though you only want to know so you mustn't

arrive there.  We could say a lot of clever or snappy things

about cases, about preclears and so forth, go ahead, well, that's

fun.  But remember this, basically underlying all of this, you're

simply trying to change somebody's survival pace.  Well, you can

change it in 80,000 departments if you want to, if you start

selectively.  Well, let's get the department that is the closest

level of change, and you'll find out those categories.  When

you're pitching the hottest, you'll be pitching on duplication,

and next to the hottest on truth, and next to the hottest on

ownership. 



Yeah, you'd be surprised what truth is merchandised as.  "It's

true."  "No it's not."  "Yes it is."  "Now look, I'll prove to

you it's true.  Aah, go on, admit it's true, pow!"  "OK, it's

true.  It's true."  Merchandising.  Merchandising of truth is

most cunningly accompanied by a light tap on the nose or a kick

in the shins.  And if the kick in the shins or a tap on the nose

is in itself truth, then we have all the truth there is in a

world war.  But people, unfortunately, aren't happy in wars,

they're bored.  They're bored with staying around the base

hospitals when they ought to get gallanntly wounded in first-aid

stations.  So the main, the main thing that we're up against,

then, all the way along the line is the impact versus

knowingness.  People get so immersed in impacts that they begin

to believe at length that impacts themselves are knowingness, and

they aren't.  They're NOT-knowingness.  That's how you put

together barriers, but the fellow can at least know the impact.

You see how mild it gets after a while?  He'll settle for at

least knowing he was hit.  You know, before that moment he knew

an awful lot about politics, but right after he was hit he

settled for being hit on the subject.  If you hit him hard enough

he'd know nothing about politics. 



There's a planet right nearby here, well six, there's six planets

right nearby here where the practice on a criminal is to bop him

from below and above with two electronic cones.  And it certainly

extinguishes him, but it's an impact of such magnitude that he

gets total amnesia.  Total.  And he just knows the impact then,

you see he's had to settle for the impact.



Well, of course, he knows he's a piece of energy, he's been

educated into knowing that.  And he knows he's a mass, so he

can't exteriorize from the vicinity of the impacts, so he can't

regain any other knowingness than he has had, and he "knows" all

these things now.  And of course, the more he knows in that

category, the more data he has, the more comm lag he has, the

less he remembers, the less he really knows.  The fast way out of

all this is exteriorization.  Exteriorization, change of space

and so forth, that is exercises in this department, and as far as

concepts are concerned and up along that level, when we get

knowingness, see, we've got a very embracive thing, we get

knowingness, certainty and so on.  But when the techniques are

concerned, those techniques that hit into truth first, those

techniques hit into duplication, those techniques that hit into

truth and those techniques which hit into ownership, you know,

"it's mine, it's somebody else's," are the hottest in production

of perception changes.  They're real hot.  They really smoke,

because truth is used as comm line material here.



You have two little kids arguing, that's all they argue about is

truth and, of course, their ideas of truth, "I'm Tom Mix, no I'm

not Tom Mix."  "Yes you are."  "Well I'm, I'm..."  Here we go,  I

mean, a big argument, the truth of identity also, true beingness

and so on, truth.  And ownership is the guy can't see what he

doesn't own some part of.  He must, you find this out in

processing ownership, and they're are special processes to go

with these, but we're not worried about these processes right

now.  We got 8-C.  And don't think that tomorrow, we're all going

to shift and change gears and it's all going to be different and

so forth. 



Now, I've been going over this for quite a while and the main

thing I've been doing is just picking up, picking up mainly a

better integration of the theory as expressed by the technique.

And the theory has been sort of just sitting there for a long

time now, it's just been coasting, and for about a year, I've

just been trying to fit the technique a little closer into the

theory and add a little bit more to it.  And 8-C now has been

some little time in development and is pretty darn static.  And

the number of factors which I was talking about a few weeks ago

to the second unit, I was talking about a certain set of factors

that were important factors and actually, I was talking about

four factors in terms of theory and we haven't had any occasion

to alter these things at all.  I've found another way to express

certainty is about all since then, I just, it's just that, TRUTH.

People get certainty and truth all confused, and impacts and

truth all confused, and then they go by the boards.  Well, I

wouldn't even bring it up now if there wasn't a very fast way to

run it.  You just run, it is true and it isn't true, three things

that are true, three things that are not true, in brackets.  It's

that idiotic and gets a fellow off the maybes of knowingness just

by the carload lot, up to the time when the symbol "truth" itself

wears out.  And it wears out when the impacts go, so he's quite

happy when this happens.



Well, let's not belabor this too much or worry about it, our main

concern here is with auditing and my main caution on this is do

the expected, not the unexpected, and don't change pace on your

preclear when he's boiling.  If you're going to be spectacular,

be it when he's wide awake.  And if he starts to get bored, and

let me lay this in with a club, when he starts to get bored, you

shift off onto duplication, Step 8 SOP-8C.  And it's right there,

it says in the congress form exactly how you do it.  There are

other ways to do it, but these are kind of hot, those two.

They're easily done.  You'll be able to do them much better when

you get a lot more theory or stuff like that behind you, but

that'll serve. 



You could run out by duplication this feeling of frenzy that a

guy gets into, not by suddenly pulling off of it or running away

from it or saying, "Well he's getting bored," you'd better

intensify it and run it out, that's all.  Well, how can you

duplicate any more thoroughly than going through the same motion?

Alright, go through the same motion.  If you start to do it in

terms of mock-ups, though, all the time, you'll practically spin

a guy in doing nothing but mock-ups, without any variation of any

kind whatsoever, endlessly, on the same subject.  In the same

mock-up and the same mock-up, you're only hitting one universe,

you're hitting his.



So let him, let him duplicate in various fashions, let him

duplicate by touching things, by going places, let him duplicate

by going through the same motion, over and over, it'll be quite

relentless, and he duplicates much more arduously if he has to do

it on count, that is to say by unit time.  Every two seconds he

touches something, rrrrrrr!  That's a desperate thing, every two

seconds he touches something and withdraws from it.  And every,

you know, every two seconds, then he touches something and

withdraws from it.  Now two seconds from the moment of his

withdraw, and he touches it again and withdraws from it again.



If you don't believe that's spin-bin stuff, why, try to run it

some time for a couple of hours, and by the time you've run it a

couple of hours, boy, I tell you, you're about, about one-eighth

of the way through, you're sure you're done, you're going to blow

him to bits.  And shortly after that, you're sure that there's no

apathy anyplace, see, then you're resigning yourself to doing it,

and then you decide, well, you'll be patient and humor it all and

you'll get through it somehow.  And then you decide it's

something that you're just going through just to please somebody,

and then after a while, why, you find out, duplication.  Then

your tendency is to set it up automatic so that you're not paying

any attention to it again, at which moment the auditor watches

for that and has the fellow, "Now decide that you're going to

touch the ice tray.  Now decide that you're going to withdraw

from it."  Nyaa!  And there goes the automaticity, this guy can't

set it up automatic.



And it's, it's an interesting process and you'll know much more

about it when you run it, so why don't we?  OK?  You've got your,

now your short break until the first auditing period.



(end of tape)



================================