FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST PTS AND SP DETECTION, ROUTING AND HANDLING COURSE PART 5/7 CONTENTS ************************************************** This is the PTS and SP Detection, Routing and Handling Course Pack as issued and delivered in the 1977 - 1978 time frame. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. NOTE: With the following exceptions, all documents are reproduced exactly as issued. All italicized or bold characters and underlines have been omitted from this reproduction. Only minor spelling errors have been corrected. If you have questions about the content of an individual issue please refer to the Tech or OEC Volumes (which were posted previously) for clarification. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heretics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association - Unit 8 ************************************************** ===================== 036 HCOB 10 MAY 1972 Robotism HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 MAY 1972 Remimeo ROBOTISM (Reference HCOB 28 Nov 1970, C/S Series 22, "Psychosis".) A technical advance has been made in relation to the inactivity, slowness or incompetence of human beings. This discovery proceeds from a two and a half year intense study of aberration as it affects the ability to function as a group member. The ideal group member is capable of working causatively in full cooperation with his fellows in the achievement of group goals and the realization of his own happiness. The primary human failing is an inability to function as himself or contribute to group achievements. Wars, political upsets, organizational duress, growing crime rates, increasingly heavy "justice", growing demands for excessive welfare, economic failure and other age long and repeating conditions find a common denominator in the inability of human beings to coordinate. The current political answer, in vogue in this century and growing, is totalitarianism where the state orders the whole life of the individual. The production figures of such states are very low and their crimes against the individual are numerous. A discovery therefore of what this factor is, that makes the humanoid the victim of oppression, would be a valuable one. The opening lines of Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health comment on Man's lack of an answer for himself. The group needs such an answer in order to survive and for its individual members to be happy. SCALE Pan-determined Self-determined |-------- Robot | Other-determined | band | Oblivious |-------- Insane NEEDING ORDERS The exact mechanism of needing orders is to be found as an outgrowth of the mental condition outlined in HCOB 28 Nov 1970, "Psychosis". The individual with an evil purpose has to withhold himself because he may do destructive things. When he fails to withhold himself he commits overt acts on his fellows or other dynamics and occasionally loses control and does so. This of course makes him quite inactive. To overcome this he refuses any responsibility for his own actions. HCOB 10 MAY 72 - 2 - Any motion he makes must be on the responsibility of others. He operates then only when given orders. Thus he must have orders to operate. Therefore one could term such person a robot. And the malady could be called robotism. PERCEPTION Studies of perception undertaken since HCOB 28 Nov 70 reveal that sight, hearing and other channels of awareness decrease in proportion to the number of overt acts-and therefore withholds which the person has committed on the whole track. By relieving these sight has been remarkably brightened. Therefore a person who is withholding himself from committing overt acts because of his own undesired purposes has very poor perception. He does not see the environment around him. Thus, combined with his unwillingness to act on his own initiative, there is a blindness to the environment. OVERT PRODUCTS (see P/L 14 Nov 70, Org Series 14) Since he does not act upon orders he is taking responsibility for, he executes orders without fully understanding them. Further he executes them in an environment he does not see. Thus when forced to produce he will produce overt products. These are called so because they are not in actual fact useful products but something no one wants and are overt acts in themselves-such as inedible biscuits or a "repair" that is just further breakage SLOWNESS The person is slow because he is moving on other-determinism, is carefully with holding himself and cannot see anyway. Thus he feels lost, confused or unsafe and cannot move positively. Because he produces overt products he gets slapped around or goes unthanked and so begins a decline. He cannot move swiftly and if he does has accidents. So he teaches himself to be careful and cautious. JUSTICE Group justice is of some use but all it really does is make the person withhold himself even harder and while a necessary restraint, nevertheless does not itself bring a lasting improvement. Threats and "heads on a pike" (meaning examples of discipline) do however jar the person into giving his attention and channeling his actions into a more desirable path from the group viewpoint. Justice is necessary in a society of such people but it is not a remedy for improvement. MALICE Despite the viciousness of the truly insane, there is little or no real malice in the robot. The truly insane cannot control or withhold their evil purposes and dramatize them at least covertly. HCOB 10 MAY 72 - 3 - The insane are not always visible. But they are visible enough. And they are malicious. The robot on the other hand does control his evil impulses to a great extent. He is not malicious. His danger mainly stems from the incompetent things he does, the time of others he consumes, the waste of time and material and the brakes he puts on the general group endeavor. He does not do all these things intentionally. He does not really know he is doing them. He looks in wounded surprise at the wrath he generates when he breaks things, wrecks programs and gets in the way. He does not know he is doing these things. For he cannot see that he is. He may go along for some time doing (slowly wasteful) well and then carelessly smashes the exact thing that wrecks the whole activity. People suppose he cunningly intended to do so. He seldom does. He winds up even more convinced he can't be trusted and that he should withhold harder! FALSE REPORTS The robot gives many false reports. Unable to see, how can he know what is true? He seeks to fend off wrath and attract good will by "PR" (public relations boasts) without realizing he is giving false reports. MORALE The robot goes into morale declines easily. Since production is the basis of morale, and since he does not really produce much, left to his own devices, his morale sags heavily. PHYSICAL INERTIA The body is a physical object. It is not the being himself. As a body has mass it tends to remain motionless unless moved and tends to keep going in a certain direction unless steered. As he is not really running his body, the robot has to be moved when not moving or diverted if moving on a wrong course. Thus anyone with one or more of such beings around him tends to get exhausted with shoving them into motion or halting them when they go wrong. Exhaustion only occurs when one does not understand the robot. It is the exasperation that exhausts one. With understanding one is not exasperated because he can handle the situation. But only if he knows what it is. PTS Potential Trouble Sources are not necessarily robots. A PTS person generally is withholding himself from a Suppressive Person or group or thing. Toward that SP person or group or thing he is a robot! He takes orders from them if only in opposites. His overts on the SP person make him blind and non-self-determined. HCOB 10 May 72 - 4 - BASIC WHY The basic reason behind persons who cannot function, are slow or inactive or incompetent and who do not produce is WITHHOLDING SELF FROM DOING DESTRUCTIVE THINGS, AND THUS UNWILLING TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AND THEREFORE NEEDING ORDERS. The exact wording of this WHY must be done by the individual himself after examining and grasping this principle. If one writes this principle down on the top of a sheet and then asks the person to word it exactly as it applies to himself one will attain the individual why for inaction and incompetence. It will produce GIs and F/N at the Examiner. PROCESSING Physical work in the physical universe, general confronting, reach and withdraw, and Objective Processes go far in remedying this condition. Touch assists regularly and correctly given to proper End Phenomena will handle illnesses of such persons. Word Clearing is vital tech to open the person's comm lines, wipe out earlier misunderstoods and increase his understanding. PTS tech will handle the person's robotism toward SP individuals, groups or things. To this and the PTS Rundown can be added the WHY above as it relates to the things or beings found as suppressive as a last step. The why above can be used in Danger Formula work such as HCO P/L 9 April 72, Correct Danger Formula, and HCO P/L 3 May 72, "Ethics and Executives". Other individual whys can exist in these instances. EXPANDED DIANETICS The miracle of well done perfectly executed Expanded Dianetics eradicates both insanity and robotism. Drug handling and other actions may be necessary. END PRODUCT The end product when one has fully handled robotism is not a person who cannot follow orders or who operates solely on his own. Totalitarian states fear any relief of the condition as they foolishly actively promote and hope for such beings. But this is only a deficiency in their own causes and their lack of experience with fully self-determined beings. Yet education, advertising and amusements have been designed only for robots. Even religions existed to suppress "Man's Evil Nature". Lacking any examples or understanding many have feared to free the robot to his own control and think even with horror on it. But you see, beings are NOT basically robots. They are miserable when they are. Basically they prosper only when they are self-determined and can be pandetermined to help in the prosperity of all. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:sb.bh Copyright ($) 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 037 HCOB 9 DEC 1971RB PTS Rundown - Revised 29 July 76 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo Class IV HCO BULLETIN OF 9 DECEMBER 1971RB Ex Dn Spclst REVISED 29 JULY 1976 Requires: Revision in this type style to cancel WC 2 any restriction of PTS RD to Ex Dn * Rate and to add Flow 0 Commands Clay for Quad pcs. TRs 4000-9 4000-10 PTS RUNDOWN References: BPL 31 May 7IRA PTS/SP Checksheet HCOB 20 Jan 72 PTS RD Addition HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/S'ing a PTS RD HCOB 3 Jun 72R PTS RD, Final Step HCOB 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79 PTS Interviews HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS Handling HCOB 9 Nov 67 Review Auditors HCOB 14 Jan 68 S&D Type "S" HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds by Button HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scn CASES One remaining problem in cases was "PTS phenomena." P.T.S. means Potential Trouble Source. When someone is suppressed he becomes a Potential Trouble Source. There are numerous HCOBs and PLs on this subject. All of them are true observations and predictions. The cause of ROLLERCOASTER is PTS. Rollercoaster means a slump after a gain. Pcs who do not hold their gains are PTS. S and Ds (for Search and Discovery) was the earlier approach. These are still valid and "3 S&Ds" as a rundown is used in the PTS Rundown without change. Now with the PTS Rundown, the handling of this common and all too frequent case condition can be handled. WHO DOES IT Hopefully it can be done by Class IVs who are also HDCs, HGC Okay to Audits. For an Auditor who is not HDC Class IV Okay to Audit HGC by competent interneship to attempt a PTS Rundown would be very risky for the pc as it needs exact listing, exact TRs, exact metering, exact Code keeping and very honest auditing and competent C/Sing. DEVELOPMENT Earlier discovery and development of the PTS theory is extensively covered. The recent wrap up came about through my OT research in November 1971. HCOB 9 Dec 71RB - 2 - The principle breakthrough was realizing one should NOT invalidate having known certain people before. This is similar to the past life discovery in 1950. Some people thinking this was "unpopular" frowned on it. Some others were only famous characters so flagrantly that past lives were easily invalidated. But people who don't go past track in Dianetics don't recover. Even running them as "imaginary" as in Science of Survival advices suddenly breaks through for a stalled Dianetic Case. In this same way with young men and girls using "I knew you when you were _________ for 2D advantage tended to invalidate having known certain individuals before this life. But now it turns out that the ONLY PTS situation that is serious and lasting and can cause a rollercoaster comes from having known the person before this life. Possibly in the last life or earlier lives one knew persons before that life too. This however shows up in the 3 S&Ds. BREAKDOWN There are only four points of breakdown of the PTS Rundown. 1. Improperly audited. Auditor not able to always do a correct list, TRs out, metering out, poor R3R, just plain untrained or not totally familiar with this Rundown. 2. Pc not completely set up. Like: Has TA trouble but no C/S 53 done, is a no change case but no GF 40R done, old auditing not repaired by a GF and proper programming or no C/S 54 or too tired or too ill for the R3R. 3. The Rundown not fully and completely done, but chopped or left incomplete (pc will still rollercoaster). 4. People who "can't run engrams"-which means a druggie who hasn't had a full Drug Rundown. There is nothing especially tricky about the auditing of the PTS Rundown except that all auditing should be of flubless quality and when the PTS RD is flubbed by bad lists or poor R3R or out TRs or poor metering it really IS a mess. The RD is so powerful that errors in C/Sing and auditing it are especially rough. Currently sick pcs should not be run on the PTS Rundown as a standard practice. It IS what they need BUT you can easily overwhelm a sick pc with engram running. The time to run a PTS RD is when the pc is set up and when it is noted the pc rollercoasters, not when he collapses with a temperature. Rollercoaster can also be caused by a bad Interiorization RD or Int repair, out lists, bypassed charge of other descriptions. These should be gotten rid of before a PTS RD is attempted. The prerequisites for a PTS RD are covered in 2 and 4 above. It is not restricted to Ex On but is a separate RD developed before Ex Dn. BEHAVIOR OF RD Valence shifts occur rapidly and frequently in PTS RDs and should be noted on the worksheet. The R3R can sometimes be a bit of a long haul on a basic incident. Be sure with an L3RD. But get an erasure of basic no matter how hard you have to work at it. In the HCOB 9 Dec 71RB - 3 - PTS RD incidents can "develop." Missing pieces can appear. A whole new slant can occur on the subject when one goes to F2 after finishing Fl. Chronic somatics are likely to appear and be handled on this Rundown. And case conditions not previously remedied by other means can be remedied by this Rundown. END PHENOMENA There is a point where the pc ~s absolutely sure he knew the person before this life. This is NOT the EP. A pc can exteriorize on this RD. That is NOT the EP (but requires an Int RD if none has been done before and the TA goes high, or its correction). THE EP IS A PC WHO IS GETTING AND KEEPING CASE GAINS AND NEVER AGAIN ROLLERCOASTERS. FLOWS You cannot use Flow 1 as any old direction to or from pc. To do this fouls it up. Flow 1 is to the pc. Flow 2 is pc to the person (or place). Flow 3 is the person (Or place) to others. If you did Fl R3R as "Locate a time you knew ________ " you might get to the pc, pc to the person or the person to others. You would not get a clean motivator Fl. This would leave the PTS chain partially run. This is also true of the ruds. RE-DOs If the pc does not recover, then reasons for failure 1 to 4 above should be checked into. Then the lists and R3R should be handled with L4BR and L3RD. Then an overlooked item or person or place should be scouted for and handled. There is no question of the validity of the Rundown. It might have missed. "True love" might have been passed over as unlikely but such obsessive attraction is always based on having known (and probably done in) the other person. Then the true EP will be attained where it only appeared to be before. SUMMARY OF REFERENCES Here are the issues that directly cover the Rundown: HCOB 9 Dec 71RA PTS Rundown HCOB 20 Jan 72 PTS RD Addition HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List HCOB 17 Apr 72 C/S Series 76 C/Sing a PTS RD HCOB 3 Jun 72RA PTS RD, Final Step HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&Ds by Button HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scientology HCOB 20 Apr 72 C/S Series 78 Issue II HCOB 15 Dec 68R L4BR HCOB 24 Apr 72 C/S Series 79 PTS Interviews HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS Handling HCOB 9 Dec 71RB - 4 - THE RUNDOWN A. PAST S&Ds: 1. Collect up past S&D items (which should have already been verified on set-ups) or get the pc to tell you them if no folder. _____ 2. On the earliest one ask if known before. If it so reads handle per steps 3-6. If not, pick next item and repeat this check for validity. _____ 3. R3R Triple/Quad the item using these commands: Fl. Locate a time when __________ did something to you. R3R. F2. Locate a time when you did something to __________ R3R. F3. Locate a time when __________ did something to others. R3R. F0. Locate a time when you did something to yourself because of __________. R3R. _____ 4. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item using these commands: (a) Did _________ ARC Break you? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. (b) Did you ARC Break _________? ARCU CDEINR. E/S to F/N. (c) Did _________ ARC Break others? ARCU CDEINR. (d) Did you ARC Break with yourself because of _________ ? ARCU CDEINR. _____ ALWAYS DO A FRESH ARCU CDEINR ON EACH E/S. (e) Did __________ give you a problem? E/S to F/N. (f) Did you give __________ a problem? E/S to F/N. (g) Did __________ give others problems? E/S to F/N. (h) Did you give yourself problems because of __________ ? E/S to F/N. _____ (1) Did you withhold anything from _________? E/S to F/N. (j) Did ________ withhold anything from you? E/S to F/N. (k) Did ________ withhold anything from others? E/S to F/N. HCOB 9 Dec 71RB - 5 - (l) Did you withhold anything from yourself because of __________ ? E/S to F/N. _____ (m) Did __________ commit an overt (harmful act) on you? E/S to F/N. (n) Did you commit an overt (harmful act) on __________? E/S to F/N. (o) Did __________commit an overt on others? E/S to F/N. (p) Did you commit an overt on yourself because of __________ ? E/S to F/N _____ 5. Run "Can't Hav/Enforced Hav" with these steps: (a) Clear "Can't have", "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING TO SOMEONE ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT WHAT THEY DIDN'T WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an example or two. (b) Run on the SP items "can't have/enforced have" as motivator repetitive, then overt repetitive, the flow three terminal to others, others to terminal, (four flows of two commands each, or five if pc Quad). (c) After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective Havingness should be run. THE COMMANDS: Fl. 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on you? 2. What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want? _____ F2. 1. What can't have did you run on (terminal)? 2. What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want? _____ F3. 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on others? 2. What did (terminal) force on others they didn't want? _____ F3A. 1. What can't have did others run on (terminal)? 2. What did others try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want? _____ F0. 1. What Cant Have aid you run on yourself because of __________ ? 2. What did you try to force on yourself because of that you didn't want? _____ HCOB 9 Dec 71RB - 6 - -- OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS -- _____ 6. Handle all past S&D items per above steps. _____ B. PAST PTS INTER VIEWS: 7. Collect up all past PTS Interview items (which should have already been verified with C/S Series 78 on set-ups). _____ 8. Check known before on earliest one. If it so reads handle as below. _____ 9. R3R Triple/Quad the item. _____ 10. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item. _____ 11. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item followed by Objective Hav. _____ 12. Repeat steps 8-11 on all valid past PTS Interview items. _____ C. NEW S&Ds (3 S&Ds): 13. Do 3 S&Ds per HCOB 16 Aug 69 Handling Illness in Scientology, assessment and L&Ns. _____ 14. Check the first item for known before, handle if it so reads. _____ 15. R3R Triple/Quad the item. _____ 16. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts on the item. _____ 17. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav on the item, followed by Objective Hav. _____ 18. Repeat steps 14-17 on the other items if valid. _____ D. TROUBLED/WORRIED: 19. L&N Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or worried you? to B/D F/N item. (Usually includes father, mother, wife or wives, husband, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, grandparents, lovers.) _____ 20. Check item for known before, if it so reads: _____ 21. R3R Triple/Quad _____ 22. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts. _____ 23. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav followed by Objective Hav. _____ E. BEEN AFTER. 24. L&N Who have you been after this life? to BD F/N item. _____ 25. Check known before and if it reads: _____ 26. R3R Triple/Quad _____ 27. Triple/Quad Ruds & Overts. _____ 28. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _____ HCOB 9 Dec 71RB - 7 - F. PLANETS. 29. L&N What planets have you known before this lifetime? to BD F/N item. _____ 30. R3R Triple/Quad _____ 31. Triple/Quad Ruds and Overts. _____ 32. Can't Hav/Enforced Hav plus Objective Hav. _____ 33. D of P Interview the person AFTER the RD is "complete" to be sure the person is now all right (not PTS). ----------- REPAIR Auditor errors during the RD are handled with L4BR, L3RD, GF Method 5 and handle, C/S 53 if necessary. A really big snarl up on the RD that won't clear up is handled with HCOB 16 Apr 72 PTS RD Correction List. If pc gets ill or rollercoasters after the RD is complete the PTS RD Correction List HCOB 16 Apr 72 is done and whatever was missed is cleared up. SUMMARY The PTS RD as revised is very direct and powerful. The L&N blows each aspect apart. Don't miss on it with auditor flubs. Get it drilled thoroughly before it is delivered. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt Copyright ($) 1971, 1974, 1976 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 038 HCOB 3 JUN 1972R PTS Rundown, Final Step - Revised 15 Oct 74 HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JUNE 1972R Class IV REVISED 15 OCTOBER 1974 and above. (Cancels BTB 24 Mar 73R PTS RD Errors.) PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP The following is an additional step to the PTS Rundown developed by me and tested at Flag. This step is run after each terminal is run, to prevent by-passing charge. THE STEPS ARE: 1. Select the terminal already run in R3R and Ruds. 2. Clear "can't have", "couldn't have" as DENIAL OF SOMETHING TO SOMEONE ELSE. Clear "enforced have" as MAKING SOMEONE ACCEPT WHAT THEY DIDN'T WANT. Have pc get the idea of these with an example or two. 3. Run on the SP items "can't have/enforced have" as motivator repetitive, then overt repetitive, the flow three terminal to others, others to terminal, (four flows of two commands each). 4. After EACH item is handled with the four flows, Objective Havingness should be run. Than the next PTS RD item is taken up, run R3R and Rude then can't have/enforced have. THE COMMANDS: FLOW ONE: 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on you? 2. What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want? FLOW TWO: 1. What can't have did you run on (terminal)? 2. What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want? FLOW 1. What can't have did (terminal) run on others? THREE: 2. What did (terminal) force on others they didn't want? FLOW 1. What can't have did others run on (terminal)? THREE 2. What did others try to force on (terminal) (A): that he (she, it) didn't want? -- OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS -- THEORY The theory is that SPs are SPs because they deny Hav and enforce unwanted Hav. They also deny do and enforce unwanted do. They also deny be and enforce unwanted be. HCOB 3.6.72R - 2 - Rev. 15.10.74 This is why we have never before been able to run subjective Hay. It collided with SPA, Overts, and Withholds on them. A very full Rundown then would be to start with don't be, must be go on to don't do, must do end up with can't have, enforced have. (Not to be run at this time.) Hav alone should handle without resorting to be or do. END OFF AT ONCE AND BEGIN OBJECTIVE HAVINGNESS IF THE TA SOARS OR THE PC CAVES IN. If this does not handle, then do a CS 53RH at once and handle. PTS RD NOTES With the issue of HCOB 2? Mar 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions it becomes necessary to convert the PTS RD 2wcs for items into L&N questions. Example: Who have you known this lifetime who has troubled or worried you? L&N to BD F/N item. Avoid listing the same question twice. The L&N for places and planets should be restricted to planets only on VA pcs and an L-4BR used at the first sign of trouble. Additional PTS RD items can be obtained from past PTS Interviews. Done by L&N the RD is very powerful and direct. The pc must be, well set up for it. L. RON HUBBARD FOUNDER LRH:nt Copyright ($) 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 039 HCOPL 27 Oct 1964 Policies on Physical Healing, Insanity and PTS HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead. Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 OCTOBER 1964 Remimeo (Re-issued on 23 June 1967) Franchise (Replaces HCO Pol Ltr 5 Nov 1964) All Students All Staff Registrars' Hats Tech Hats Qual Hats HCO Hats POLICIES ON PHYSICAL HEALING, INSANITY AND POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCES It has been the long standing policy of Central Organizations to handle physical illness and insanity in the following manner. HEALING Any process labelled "healing", old or new refers to healing by mental and spiritual means and should therefore be looked upon as the relief of difficulties arising from mental and spiritual causes. The proper procedure in being requested to heal some complained of physical disability is as follows: 1. Require a physical examination from whatever practitioners of the physical healing arts may be competent and available; 2. Clearly establish that the disability does not stem from immediately physical causes; 3. If the disability is pronounced to be curable within the skill of the physical practitioner and is in actual fact a disease or illness which surrenders to contemporary physical treatment, to require the person to be so treated before Scientology processing may be undertaken; 4. If, however, the physical practitioner's recommendation includes surgery or treatment of an unproven nature or the illness or disease cannot be accurately diagnosed as a specific physical illness or disease with a known cure, the person may be accepted for processing on the reasonable assumption that no purely physical illness is proven to exist, and that it is probably mental or spiritual in origin. POLICIES REGARDING THE INSANE With insane persons or persons with a proven record of insanity, do the following: 1. Establish to the best of your ability within reasonable administrative limits and known tests that any HGC pc accepted for processing does not have a history of deserved institutionalization in an insane asylum or similar place; 2. Process only those persons who have no such history; 3. Do not recommend any other treatment by practitioners in the field of insanity where there exists any evidence that such practitioners injure, disable or maltreat patients by violently reacting drugs, by painful shocks, surgery or other barbaric and outdated means of "mental treatment"; 4. If no recommendation is possible under (3) above, recommend only rest and a change of environment, but not in a professional capacity. HCO PL 27 Oct 64 - 2 - POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCES Policies similar to those regarding physical illness and insanity exist for types of persons who have caused us considerable trouble. These persons can be grouped under "Potential Trouble Sources". They include: (a) Persons intimately connected with persons (such as marital or familial ties) of known antagonism to mental or spiritual treatment or Scientology. In practice such persons, even when they approach Scientology in a friendly fashion, have such pressure continually brought to bear upon them by persons with undue influence over them that they make very poor gains in processing and their interest is solely devoted to proving the antagonistic element wrong. They, by experience, produce a great deal of trouble in the long run as their own condition does not improve adequately under such stresses to effectively combat the antagonism. Their present time problem cannot be reached as it is continuous, and SO long as it remains so, they should not be accepted for auditing by any organization or auditor. (b) Criminals with proven criminal records often continue to commit so many undetected harmful acts between sessions that they do not make adequate case gains and therefore should not be accepted for processing by organizations or auditors. (c) Persons who have ever threatened to sue or embarrass or attack or who have publicly attacked Scientology or been a party to an attack and all their immediate families should never be accepted for processing by a Central Organization or an auditor. They have a history of only serving other ends than case gain and commonly again turn on the organization or auditor. They have already barred themselves out by their own overts against Scientology and are thereafter too difficult to help, since they cannot openly accept help from those they have tried to injure. (d) Responsible-for-condition cases have been traced back to other causes for their condition too often to be acceptable. By Responsible-for-condition cases is meant the person who insists a book or some auditor is "wholly responsible for the terrible condition I am in". Such cases demand unusual favours, free auditing, tremendous effort on the part of auditors. Review of these cases show that they were in the same or worse condition long before auditing. that they are using a planned campaign to obtain auditing for nothing, that they are not as had off as they claim, and that their antagonism extends to anyone who seeks to help them, even their own families. Establish the rights of the matter and decide accordingly. (e) Persons who are not being audited on their own determinism are a liability as they are forced into being processed by some other person and have no personal desire to become better. Quite on the contrary they usually want only to prove the person who wants them audited wrong and so do not get better. Until a personally determined goal to be processed occurs, the person will not benefit. (f) Persons who "want to be processed to see if Scientology works" as their only reason for being audited have never been known to make gains as they do not participate. News reporters fall into this category. They should not be audited. (g) Persons who claim that "if you help such and such a case" (at great and your expense) because somebody is rich or influential or the neighbors would be electrified should be ignored. Processing is designed for bettering individuals, not progressing by stunts or giving cases undue importance. Process only at convenience and usual arrangements. Make no extraordinary effort at the expense of other persons who do want processing for normal reasons. Not one of these arrangements has ever come off successfully as it has the unworthy goal of notoriety, not betterment. (h) Persons who "have an open mind" but no personal hopes or desires for HCO PL 27 Oct 64 - 3 - auditing of knowingness should be ignored, as they really don't have an open mind at all, but a lack of ability to decide about things and are seldom found to be very responsible and waste anyone's efforts "to convince them". (i) Persons who do not believe anything or anyone can get better. They have a purpose for being audited entirely contrary to the auditor's and so in this conflict, do not benefit. When such persons are trained they use their training to degrade others. Thus they should not he accepted for training or auditing. (j) Persons attempting to sit in judgement On Scientology in hearings or attempting to investigate Scientology should be given no undue importance. One should not seek to instruct or assist them in any way. This includes judges, boards, newspaper reporters, magazine writers, etc. All efforts to be helpful or instructive have done nothing beneficial as their first idea is a firm "I don't know" and this usually ends with an equally firm "I don't know". If a person can't see for himself or judge from the obvious, then he does not have sufficient powers of observation even to sort out actual evidence. In legal matters, only take the obvious effective steps- carry on no crusades in court. In the matter of reporters, etc., it is not worthwhile to give them any time contrary to popular belief. They are given their story before they leave their editorial rooms and you only strengthen what they have to say by saying anything. They are no public communication line that sways much. Policy is very definite. Ignore. To summarize potential trouble sources, the policy in general is to cut communication as the longer it is extended the more trouble they are. I know of no case where the types of persons listed above were handled by auditing or instruction. I know of many cases where they were handled by firm legal stands, by ignoring them until they changed their minds, or just turning one's back. In applying such a policy of cut-communication one must also use judgement as there are exceptions in all things and to fail to handle a person's momentary upset in life or with us can be quite fatal. So these policies refer to non- Scientology persons in the main or persons who appear on the outer fringes and push toward us. When such a person bears any of the above designations we and the many are better off to ignore them. Scientology works. You don't have to prove it to everyone. People don't deserve to have Scientology as a divine right, you know. They have to earn it. This has been true in every philosophy that sought to better mail. THE STRESS OF POLICY All the above "Potential Trouble Sources" are also forbidden training and when a person being trained or audited is detected to belong under the above headings (a) to (j) he or she should be advised to terminate and accept refund which must be paid at once and the full explanation should be given them at that time. Thus tile few may not, in their own turmoil, impede service to and the advance of the many. And the less enturbulence you put on your lines, the better, and the more people you will eventually help. Scientology is an applied philosophy designed and developed to make the able more able. In this sphere it is tremendously successful. Efforts to involve philosophy with other practices bring about a slowing of our progress. These people are sick spiritually because of their own continuous harmful actions against patients and the society and are beyond our normal means to help. These policies will continue in existence until such time as those interested care to invest the time and treasure necessary to build the institutions and re-educate the professions which now practise medical and physical mental healing, and this is HCO PL 27 Oct 64 - 4 - definitely not within our time, but would belong to some remote future when more men are sane. However, such a programme would depend upon tile continued existence of the medical practitioner and tile psychiatrist and as their more reprehensible activities are rather new and very radical they may be abandoned by public and government long before Scientology could help them. This is probably the more likely occurrence as even in Russia, the Communist has now foresworn all violent treatments of the insane according to their delegates to the London Medical Conference of this year, and Russian practitioners look with contempt and scorn upon the Western psychiatrist. The medical doctor of England, taken over by Socialism, has lost his ambition for medical imperialism and has no contest with Scientology. In the United States the American Medical Association has become locked in mortal combat with the government and probably will be socialized entirely in a few years due to fee abuses and lack of gains. The medical doctor remains strong only in more backward small nations such as Australia where world trends are late in arriving. Even the Church in Rome is considering a surrender of principles and amalgamation with other faiths in an effort to save a dwindling religious membership. Thus there may be no medical practitioner as we know him left in a few decades. Membership in the psychiatric profession is declining. In the place of these institutions, if we ever get around to them, we may find ourselves dealing with completely different practices in tile fields of physical healing and the treatment of the insane. All we ask of them is that they are competent in their treatments and less greedy for monopoly than their predecessors. And if this is so, then our policies will then remain fully in force, but in a spirit of co-operation, not with the desire to protect ourselves and tile public from them and tile products of their bungling. Ours are the powerful communication lines. They are powerful because they are theta lines. Entheta (enturbulated theta) obtains all its apparent power by being parasitic on theta lines. Only when you add the power of our lines to the weakness of entheta lines can they then have strength. Example: It was the FCDC communication to its own field about that government raid that (a) cost the most in cash and (b) did the most damage. You can actually ignore an entheta line in almost all cases without the faintest consequence. It only has power when we let it have power by answering it. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jw.jp.cden Copyright ($) 1964, 1967 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 040 HCOPL 5 Apr 1965 Academies Relation to HCO Justice HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 APRIL 1965 Issue II Remimeo All Instructors Hats DIVISION 4 HCO Personnel Hats TECHNICAL HCG Auditors Hats Sthil Executives Sthil Instructors ACADEMIES RELATION TO HCO JUSTICE Sthil Staff Auditors STUDENT TRAINING THE NO-GAIN-CASE STUDENT Instructor's MUST he alert for no-case-change cases on course and for "Withholdy pcs who ARC Break easily", "blowy students" and "unstable gains" cases. Even indifferent auditing on even a haphazard course causes good case gains. The minority group of no-case-change in routine course auditing and "withholdy" is very minor. These categories contain all the students who disturb your course, are insolent to instructors, rant against rules, etc. You are under no orders from me that you must please them but you are under orders to report such cases to HCO. YOU ONLY USE DIFFICULT CASE OR STUDENT IN THE ACADEMY AS AN INDICATOR OF SOMETHING WORSE. You aren't a staff auditor but an Instructor. You want proper auditor and case gain of course and you'll get it (providing when some student says It didn't work to find out exactly what the student did that didn't work and you'll find it was never what was ordered). However, on cases that are very difficult, watch it! These difficult cases are more than cases. They mean trouble for you from that student and for your class in ways you wouldn't look for. By concentrating on "tough cases" you miss the fact that you have a whole class to handle. If you want it handled, look rather at what these tough cases do to your class and handle the "tough case" in a way to protect your course, not to make their cases move. IN AN ACADEMY, DON'T TRY TO HANDLE YOUR COURSE ENVIRONMENT WITH STUDENT AUDITING! Handle your course with good data, good 8C and discipline and HCO Justice machinery. Your students now have their old course regulations suspended. Instead, the Justice Codes are in. The students are Scientologists. Becoming students gives them no new rights. And it doesn't remove their Justice rights either. I've been through all you go through and I have found, by comparing conduct on a course to conduct in the field afterwards, that the turbulent student is a pc, not a student. He or she makes trouble. On the course and afterwards. The total symptom that alerts you to such a. person is "tough case". This is very easy to notice. Just look over the student case folders and note that one or another student doesn't seem to get going. Note the folder you have to work on. That's it. That's your trouble spot on the course. DON'T judge students by conduct or speed of study. Judge on "tough case" only. Routine auditing is good unless it's been alter-ised. Routine processes work on good people. The no-case-gain case makes you hunt for magical processes and fatally leads to alter-is. Now hear this: HCO PL 5 Apr 65 II - 2 - THE PROCESSES YOU HAVE, EVEN WHEN ONLY FAIR, ARE BETTER THAN THE PROCESSES THAT WILL BE DREAMED UP BY STUDENTS OR ANYONE AROUND YOUR COURSE. The processes you use, if altered to "fit" some tough case will cease to work on standard cases when so altered. The "tough case" (who is also the difficult student) is the sole reason one has an urge to alter a process. You must be sure to push routine processes done routinely. When you see a process being altered look for a "tough case" in the pc or the student and call HCO promptly if you find the poor TA type case, the "no change" response to routine processes. Your approach is to run the standard processes in the right grade in the right sequence. That's all you teach students to do and it's all you do in case supervision. When these "don't work" even when you force them to be correctly applied. you have a tough case there. Don't louse up Scientology technology to handle a "tough case". You don't have to invent the processes for it. They already exist in the HGC. When you see alter-is, look for the tough case and let HCO take it from there. We are, after all a team, and as a team we can handle our environment. Your job is just teach and get run the processes of the grade in the right sequence. Your job is to teach students to do just that. Your job is to force the student to run the process that should be run and run it right and to correct any alter-is savagely. Never let some student tell you "it didn't work" without at once plowing in there to look. You will find only one of two things wrong:- 1. Your student erred in the wording, sequence or application of the process through lack of study or 2. Either the student auditor or the student pc is a "tough case". Don't let anybody try to vary a process to fit a case. If you do your indicator is obscured in letting anybody fool about in "trying to make a process work" or trying to get inventive just to crack a "tough case". The majority of your course trouble and the tendency to alter-is material comes from trying to force a "tough case" to get gains. Should you alter or advise alteration of a process you are letting our side down. It leads you into teaching students to alter-is and there goes the balloon. It means they won't be able to run standard stuff successfully. And that means (let's be brutal) they will miss, by non-standard auditing, on 90% of their cases, the good people. They will slant all Scientology toward one nut and we'll be a failed mess like psychiatry with our clinics full of psychiatric cases not people. The HGC (and perhaps one course level) is taught to handle "tough cases". The processes for them are standard, too. You must hold the line and answer a student's "didn't work" with "Exactly what didn't work?" and "Exactly what did you do?" and you'll find they didn't do it, or it's a tough case. Either way follow policy. YOU MUST REPORT A TOUGH CASE TO HCO AT ONCE. For there sits a Justice matter, not an Academy problem. It's not your hat. You see the no-gain-case, the "withholdy case that ARC Breaks easily", "The blowy student", "unstable gain student" and your tendency may be to do something original or give the student some different process. If you do you are madly' off-policy. In the ordinary Academy Course you are not teaching a "tough case" course. You are teaching a nice fast, workable course for decent average cases. Your majority is composed of good students. They deserve your time. So this makes the "tough case" student the odd man (or woman) out. They make a lot of commotion so one may think they are "everybody" on a course. They're not. They are seldom higher than 10%. So you risk the 90% of your course and all Scientology just to handle 10%. HCO PL 5 Apr 65 II - 3 - Did I point out that the Protestant idea of recovering at any expense and considering very valuable any sheep who strayed, was batty. How about the whole flock? Leave them to the wolves while one ran off after one? No, please don't go the route by doing that. It's pretty awful. No, this "tough case" is for the HGC and HCO. And I'd darn well rather you didn't give the person the technology before he straightens out as he'll hurt people with it. Such "tough cases" are possible to salvage. They're just cases. But it takes an HGC to run them and it takes HCO to hold them still so they'll be audited. Remember, we're a team. HCO and HGC are part of the team. Don't steal their hats. The "tough case" is judged only on the basis of case gain or lack of it. The Academy does NOT send students to the HGC for "slow study" or dullness or any other reason except "tough case". That's firm policy. The "tough case" is the only one you send. There are 3 categories of these "tough cases". 1. The Roller Coaster Case. The Potential Trouble Source. A suppressive person is on the other side of this one. The case will get a gain and slump, get a gain and slump over and over. It isn't a "Manic-depressive" as the old 19th Century psycho-analyst thought. It's a guy whose marital partner or family is going into fits over this person's connection with Scientology. This is purely a Justice matter and belongs to HCO. He either disconnects or acts to settle his or her situation. No halfway measures. But you can't do much about that in an Academy. If you did you'd leave your class to the wolves. Get on-line and route this mysterious fellow who can't get a gain without losing it the next day or week over to HCO with a "Please investigate. Possible Potential Trouble Source." Don't even bother to question the student. HCO will find out. It's also illegal to audit them so HCO won't even route to the HGC but will act as per policy on such. Always err on the side of sending HCO too many students rather than risk keeping one who is a Liability to us all. But never send merely a course "cut- up" or a lazy student whose case runs well. This policy is only faintly discipline. It is actually excellent technology to a recurring course problem. 2. The Withholdy Case. The withholdy case is routinely ARC Breaking and having to he patched up, commonly blows, has to have lots of hand-holding. As your course possibly isn't at that level it is too much to handle anyway and you're not equipped to handle. But even if your course is equipped to handle the right action is again HCO. Report this student to HCO with the Label "Withholdy case that ARC Breaks easily" or "Blow type case". And get HCO over to the Academy. HCO may route to HGC at the student's own expense or get two tough staff members to stand by while the withholds are explored on a meter in case this is a real Justice case or just a student lunch thief. The reason for all that weird behaviour is always a withhold condition. You can't be bothered. HCO, however, is interested in the NO REPORT aspect of such a case. This person hasn't told all that's sure. HCO can send to HGC or refund or even Comm Ev. 3. Suppressive Person. The suppressive person doe's turn up to get trained. And when you train them (a) their case doesn't change, (b) they cheer when their course pc loses and gloom when their course pc wins and (c) they chatter about the horrors of discipline and seek to lead student squirreling or revolt. Their dream is a society wherein the criminal may do anything he pleases without any faintest restraint. We sometimes get loaded up with these characters but they run about 1 or 2 in 80 students usually. This person has no faintest chance of making it unless handled for what he or she is in an HGC. And if you train such you lend our name to all the chicanery and injury they do with our tech and protect them with our name. You've seen this case in another guise of squirreling-- chatter- chatter about phoney past lives when they were Cleopatra and so on invalidating others' actual memories, talking only whole track to raw meat. You've seen this one. It's suppression pure and simple and they know it! And they don't ever get a case change and their ARC Breaks don't heal, etc. etc. etc! The secret here is HCO PL 5 Apr 65 II - 4 - CONTINUOUS OVERTS which are then withheld. The technical fact is they are quite gone and are SOLVING A PERSONAL BUT LONG GONE PROBLEM BY CONTINUOUS OVERTS, One can actually handle them if one knows this seemingly tiny fact. One finds of course the PTP, not the overts. For one has about as much chance pulling this fellow's overts as moving the Earth by pulling weeds. The suppressive acts this person does are solutions to solve some long long ago problem in which the pc is stuck. To an HGC this is finding conditions of environment the pc has had and discovering how he or she handled them. But this is HCO--HGC business. The longer you wait to notify HCO, the more harm will be done and HCO will get inquisitive as to why there was no report from you on this. For here is the auditor heart breaker, the flatterer, the rumour factory, the 1.1 and the course and group wrecker. Here's "Whee, kill everybody!" in person. Here also is the possible government agent, the AMA BMA stooge. Here is the guy who plans to "squirrel" and "grab Scientology". Here is the boy. Or here is the girl. But here is also a thetan buried in the mud. And if you let this person go without attention he or she will soon become ill or die-or worse will mess up or kill others. The person is the only real psycho. And if you let him drift he'll soon wind up in the brain surgeon's suppressive hands. So it's nothing to overlook. People who have to solve their problems by shooting the rest of us down are what made life such a hell in this Universe. You have your hands on the implanter, the warmonger, the wrecker. But still, this is what's left of a human being and he or she can he salvaged. But only in an HGC, not a course. Please! Here also is the criminal or the sex crazy guy or the pervert who just had to break old Rule 25 (the old no-sex Academy rule). People who are sex crazy are over their heads in a collapsed bank that they've collapsed themselves with overts. Let's be real. This person throws people back in twice as fast as we can pull them out! So why arm him with tech. Put on your label when you send for HCO "No-Case-Change despite good tries with the routine processes taught on this course that was closely supervised in correct application". Let HCO take it from there. It's not Academy business. Your routine procedure on any of the 3 types of case is: 1. Call HCO Department of Inspection and Reports; 2. Minimize disturbance; 3. Hold the student in an empty classroom or auditing room; 4. Stand by to help if things get rough; 5. Help HCO complete its report; 6. Let HCO (and probably HGC) take over from there and get back to your students. If you're going to grow and get your own case changes and have a good time instructing you'll read this very, very carefully and put it very briskly into practice. At first you may not agree that you should be so sharp. It may be a blow to feeling you crack all cases. You probably can. But man, that's an HGC hat. What are you doing wearing it as an Instructor? By all means crack the routine cases. But the tough ones? That's HCO and HGC. The bigger we get, the easier all this will be. But now let's mark a start in teaching courses that are fun for all by giving the deep six to those who want a mess. Okay? Well, do it. do it, do it. L RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright ($) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ===================== 041 HCOPL 7 Apr 1965 Healing Policy in the Field HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1965 Issue II Gen Non-Remimeo A future Issue of The Auditor HEALING POLICY IN FIELD The HCO Policy Letter of October 27, 1964 is now binding on all field auditors and field staff members. Many field auditors do not realize that they damage their own dissemination and usefulness by becoming involved with the very ill and the insane. The only thing a field auditor can do, really, without going down, is to promote. run meetings and do short assists as field staff members of their nearest org. But whether they are or not, all Field Auditors including HBA, HAS and HQS must abide carefully by this policy and inform those persons who seek to persuade them to help the insane or very ill that "it is a Committee of Evidence offense to break HCO policy" and thus get themselves free. I have seen too many field auditors fail by their becoming entangled with psychos and chronically sick cases to fail to protect them from such a mistake. Excerpt from HCO Pol Ltr Oct 27 '64: "HEALING "Any process labelled 'healing', old or new refers to healing by mental and spiritual means and should therefore be looked upon as the relief of difficulties arising from mental and spiritual causes. "The proper procedure in being requested to heal some complained of physical disability is as follows: 1. Require a physical examination from whatever practitioners of the physical healing arts may be competent and available; 2. Clearly establish that the disability does not stem from immediately physical causes; 3. If the disability is pronounced to be curable within the skill of the physical practitioner and is in actual fact a disease or illness which surrenders to contemporary physical treatment, to require the person to be so treated before Scientology processing may be undertaken; 4. If, however, the physical practitioner's recommendation includes surgery or treatment of an unproven nature or the illness or disease cannot be accurately diagnosed as a specific physical illness or disease with a known cure, the person may be accepted for processing on the reasonable assumption that no purely physical illness is proven to exist, and that it is probably mental or spiritual in origin." L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.cden Copyright ($) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 042 HCOPL 30 Jul 1965 Preclear Routing to Ethics HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 JULY 1965 Sthil Tech Div Qual Div PRECLEAR ROUTING TO ETHICS There is no direct routing of preclears to the Ethics Officer except through the channels of the Qualification Division and Review. This, therefore, cancels the direct routing to Ethics as covered in the Class VII, Confidential, HCO Bulletin of 28 June 1965. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright ($) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you byq The PublIcations Organization, U. S. ===================== 043 HCOPL 16 Aug 1965 Collection from SPs and PSTs HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 AUGUST 1965 Issue II Gen Non-Remimeo COLLECTION FROM SPs AND PTSs On any Declared Suppressive Person an additional condition for return to status (Steps A to E of HCO Pol Ltr 1 March 1965) is Step B(1) which is the requirement that the SP pay off all debts owed to Scientology organizations. Any Potential Trouble Source owing money to any Scientology organization is handled the same as any other Scientologist. Failure to discharge a financial obligation becomes a civil Ethics matter after normal, within-org avenues of collection have been exhausted. Any PTS who fails to either handle or disconnect from the SP who is making him or her a PTS is, by failing to do so, guilty of a Suppressive Act. Civil Court action against SPs to effect collection of monies owed may be resorted to, as they are Fair Game. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright ($) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 044 HCOPL 14 Oct 1965 Potential Trouble Source Routing HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1965 Remimeo IMPORTANT Ethics Hat Tech Hats Qual Hats Income Hats POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE ROUTING The Ethics Officer, when receiving a person who has roller coastered (case improved then dropped), must route that person to Review. Review only must locate the correct Suppressive Person, repeat the correct SP, the right SP. Review then states: 1. Who the SP is (or who they are if more than one); 2. That good indicators came in and stayed in visibly when the SP (or SPs) was found. Review then sends the person to Ethics. Ethics must require the person as per policy to handle or disconnect. If the person will not handle or disconnect, the person is sent again to Review as the right SP has NOT been found. Further UNTIL THE PERSON HAS PAID IN CASH FOR THE REVIEW SEARCH AND DISCOVERY Ethics may not declare the person no longer PTS. (The reason for this is that the person will not pay if the wrong suppressive is found.) HGC Auditors, similarly must send a PTS to Review not Ethics. Supervisors must send any student PTS only to Review. Review always sends to Ethics hut ONLY when the right SP has been found and indicated. REVIEW AUDITOR The Review Auditor uses "Search and Discovery" as will be covered in an HCO B. If this is not to hand, simply find the right SP, indicate it to the person and watch the good indicators come in. PTSs may not be handled in ANY other way. The routing is not from Ethics to the Chaplain. Ethics does not route to the Chaplain. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright ($) 1965 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 045 HCOPL 30 Dec 1965 PTS Auditing and Routing HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 30 DECEMBER 1965 Gen Non-Remimeo PTS AUDITING AND ROUTING A PTS CANNOT BE AUDITED OR TRAINED UNTIL THE PTS SITUATION IS HANDLED. The handling of PTS cases will remain with Ethics. Ethics may do a casual location of SPs or may order a Stabilization Intensive in the HGC. (See below.) SEARCH AND DISCOVERY In cases where a handle or disconnect does not resolve the PTS situation, or in auditing a preclear to maintain stability of Release Levels, the action follow Search and Discovery technology. This will be called a Stabilization Intensive and may be ordered by Ethics n severe cases or may be sold by the Registrar. This intensive may be sold only as a five hour package, continued in 5 hour minimum amounts, delivered by the HGC as a special action and sold for $100.00 or its Sterling equivalent. It will be done in the HGC, and may not be done as part of Power Processing. A Stabilization Intensive may not be concluded, whether bought casually to assist reaching more Release Grades faster or ordered by Ethics without the Ethics Officer passing upon the Suppressive Person or Group located as being correct. If Ethics declares the Suppressive Person or Group is incorrect, the preclear must be sent to Review, not back to the HGC, and a more basic (earlier) Suppressive or Group found, with Ethics passing on the final result. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden Copyright ($) 1966 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The Publications Organization, U. S. ===================== 046 HCOPL 3 Mar 1966 Attacks on Scientology, Sex and Organizations HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 MARCH 1966 Remimeo Exec Sec Hats Exec Div ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY SEX AND ORGANIZATIONS It is interesting that a review of faltering orgs that got into trouble in their areas each one had a bad sex entanglement high on staff. A Review of actions of orgs and attacks over the last 15 years makes it stand out sharply that an org which is mixed up sexually in the higher echelons will not be effective, will have low statistics and can't defend itself on the public front. Such are not attacked for loose sexual relations. They are just too decayed t~ do a good job of defense or follow policy. So they become subject to attack. The last UK attack was easily rebuffed and so are many attacks. But where an org is caved in by had sexual messes, it doesn't seem to he able to defend itself on the general front. We don't often get such situations as a sex-mess org but where we do, they get into severe trouble on other counts. Sex, obsessive and promiscuous, is a blood brother of psychosis. Note the sex stress of Freud, the sex orgies in institutions between patients and attendants and psychiatrists. Note the book (early '5Os, U.S.) by Psychiatrist FREDA FROHMM REICHMANN, where she tries to get her fellow psychiatrists to leave their patients alone. It is a text trying to make them ethical in their practices. It reveals a sordid picture. This is given as an indicator. I know only 4 orgs in all the 16 years before this writing that collapsed or came near collapse at one period in the history of each. And each one was sex crazy. (LA 1950, Melbourne early 60s, Johannesburg 60s. Washington 62 on. Each of these got into severe trouble. LA 50 collapsed, Melbourne collapsed. Johannesburg nearly collapsed, DC is being saved only by strenuous effort.) So we have an indicator that when an org in the upper strata starts tolerating sexual promiscuity you can expect serious trouble of other kinds just ahead within the next year or two. This also applies to psychiatry as we will start knocking them out shortly. I am not talking about an occasional "affaire" or a slip. I am talking about general dedicated sexual misconduct by staff as the ordinary occurrence. As a speculation it might he the early Christians (who were no fools as they built strong organizations) discovered in the first century or two that a Church which went sexually off-beam didn't last and so banned it. They may have banned it so hard they made even casual Christians madly anti-sex, which is a lot too much. Certain it is they saw sex as an organizational menace and did not see that violent anti-sex was just as crazy, being the other side of the same coin. Thus Exec Secretaries should he alert for an org going off the beam. Watch in low statistic orgs that don't recover easily for heavy sexual promiscuity and get the sex loops out of it quick. particularly out of its upper executive level, For I promise you that that org will absorb thousands of man-hours of work to rebuild if sexual misconduct is let go on. The label of sexual promiscuity easily attaches to persons and is not always true. So be very thorough in the investigation and be sure the charges are factual. If so, shoot quick. Don't caution. Experience with such has taught me that no amount of persuasion or orders will (a) bring up their statistics or (b) stop the catastrophe they will walk into. Only prompt removal of the offenders will get the org going up again. LRH:ml.iu L. RON HUBBARD Copyright ($) 1966 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL. RIGHTS RESERVED This is Reproduced and issued to you by The publications Organization, U S. ===================== 047 HCOB 9 Nov 1967 Review Auditors Book of Case Remedies HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 NOVEMBER 1967 Remimeo REVIEW AUDITORS BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES REVISION OF REMEDY A, REMEDY B, AND S AND Ds BOOK REVISION BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES This HCO B modifies and clarifies the text This bulletin is to be inserted in and changes "The Book of Case Remedies" PROCEDURES for Remedy A, Remedy B and S and Ds (Search for and Discovery of Suppressives). Recent analysis made of Qualifications Divisions Departments of Review and of the flow of students and pcs through the Saint Hill org show 1. The KEY processes so far as orgs are concerned are Remedy A, Remedy B and S & Ds. 2. Auditors need direct mechanical technology to do these three processes effectively. REMEDY A Remedy A locates the MISUNDERSTOODS a person has in Scientology. Originally it read "Misunderstood words". Words of course will emerge in the general run of misunderstoods. REMEDY A is done only by LISTING. It must not be done verbally alone. It is a Level III process. The listing question is "In the subjects of Dianetics or Scientology who or what has been misunderstood?" The item is found on the list and given to the student. That is all. There is no other step. The rules of listing all apply. If the student won't have the item it is not correct and the list must be straightened up with the general auditing rules that govern listing. REMEDY B The form of this process is changed. It is done by three lists. These three may only be done by formal LISTING and the general tech of listing as governed by Level III tech. The lists make the form of an I ------->---|----->-------PT Subject List | Into Past List | ------->---|---->-------Misunderstood List LIST 1B This is done to locate what in the Scientology PT is giving trouble. It is done as a list and the item is found. HCOB 9 Nov 67 - 2 - The listing question is "In your studies of Dianetics and Scientology who or what are you having trouble with?" The item is found and given to the student. This step is governed by all the tech of listing. LIST 2B The item found on List 1B is now listed in order to find the past track subject similar to what is giving trouble in present time. The listing question is "In your past, who or what was similar to ____________ (item found in List lB)?" It is highly illegal to limit the question to this lifetime. All the rules of listing apply. The item is found and given to the student. LIST 3B The third list of the process is now done. The listing question is: "Who or what was misunderstood in __________ (the item found on list 2B)?" The listing is covered by the general tech of listing as found in Level III. The item is found and given to the student ----------- This completes the Remedy B. If a floating needle occurs any time during the process with good indicators thoroughly visible in the student the process is concluded at that point. The process is used on anyone having trouble studying Dianetics or Scientology. The trouble, as it doesn't clear up with Remedy A, is coming from some prior subject. More than one of these can be done if all steps are done for each one. S & D Search and Discovery of Suppression is called an "S and D". It locates the suppressives on the case. I have several times undercut (gotten processes that reach deeper) on S & Ds. The earliest process asked merely who might have been suppressive to the pc. This is still valid but I have found 2 flaws in it 1. The auditor does not do a listing type S & D at all but just chattily brushes it off. 2. The list from this question contains an actual suppressive that is passed right over. Therefore I undercut the question and obtained much better results because the new question reached deeper The new question was "Who or what might have suppressed you". Then I recalled an even deeper question. This was "What purpose has been HCOB 9 Nov 67 - 3 - suppressed?" This was given to Qual Div SH some time ago. It would have 2 lists. The first is for the purpose as above and the second would be "Who or what suppressed (purpose found)?" For some reason, probably because no one did 2 lists, this undercut was neglected. Therefore I researched further and developed what we will now use as an S & D. It is one of these killer processes. It is VERY strong. So it isn't to be carelessly done. If you get a wrong item on an S & D YOU CAN MAKE THE PC ILL. So one has to do an S & D right and follow all the rules of listing as given in Level III tech. Also I find now that when a list item found is a generality (multiple subject, not specific such as "dogs" or "the public") the list is simply not complete. One does not have to settle for a generality and then list the generality. He will find that the pc will eventually list the specific non- general item anyway. Of course one can also do a represent list of a general item found if that seems best. The real question for an S & D was established only when I found a purpose all Suppressives have in common and is a very fundamental effort in suppressives. This effort by suppressives, when found, then permitted me to form the question. The key S & D question is: "Who or what has attempted to unmock you?" Unmocking (an effort to reduce or make disappear) is the primary effort of suppressives. Therefore the listing question on test delivers up items totally overlooked by the earlier types of S & D. The question needs to be cleared carefully for non-Scientology. If it has to be re-phrased, watch out as the meaning may vanish. "Tried to make nothing of you" might substitute but at this writing only unmock has been tested and a question for others than educated Scientologists will be developed and issued and made a part of the enclosure for the book. This S & D question must be done by LISTING only and with great care to follow Level III Listing tech as it, being powerful, will backfire on the pc if done carelessly and a wrong item is found. The item is found by listing and given to the pc, which is the end of the process. If a generality results it may be represented. But listing continued will give the same result of a single item. A general must not be given to the pc as the final result. This process will now be standard review S & D. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jpth.cden Copyright ($) 1967 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED =====================