From anon@squirrel.owl.de Mon Aug 31 13:23:11 1998

Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news

Date: 31 Aug 1998 20:23:11 -0000

From: Secret Squirrel <anon@squirrel.owl.de>

Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service

	to <postmaster@squirrel.owl.de>. The message sender's identity

	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.

Subject: FZ BIBLE 1/3 SHSBC-344 ITSA MAKER LINE

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

Message-ID: <31a477b71123203d28c8f2d360c7185e@anonymous.poster>

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net

Lines: 550

Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:519354 alt.clearing.technology:63216



FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



TAPE LECTURE SHSBC-344 16 OCT 63 THE ITSA MAKER LINE 1/3



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet

are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any

Jewish opinion.



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************



THE ITSA MAKER LINE

Tape lecture of 16 Oct 1963, 

SHSBC-313 renumbered 344



(continued from part 1)



Seen doors go out of plumb and out of plane and walking

down floors which are suddenly tipping like the deck of a

rolling ship. Somebody skipped a GPM or two on you, you

know. They - they went for some ... Everybody got brilliant

at this particular point, and you had a GPM called "to

catch catfish," you see. And they did a goal oppose list

for the next earlier GPM. And they got "to be a horse." And

the pc said brightly, "Oh, that's the next goal. Yes. 'To

catch catfish' opposes 'to be a horse.' "



And the auditor says, "Well, I don't know if quite true."

See - reasonable. You know it's, "I don't know if it would

be quite true. It's uh - I guess it would be all right.

Well, we'll go ahead and find the items in it, you see.



And the next thing you know, why, corners of the room are

going at forty-five degree angles to the pc and their chin

is over here a foot and a half from the bottom of their

face, you see. And if a doctor would examine them at that

moment, they'd say, "An advanced case of coronary

thrombosis, you see." The pc's heart is leaping, you

see - air bubbles coming out of his bloodstream. Like these

divers in fish tanks, you know. Good.



Well, actually, that takes an awful level of

understanding. That takes an awful`level of determined

push-ahead. It takes a terrific amount of education to know

what's happening_to you. You'd say, "Well, huehhh!! there's

something wrong in the bank. I didn't feel like this on

Tuesday. Let's see, what in the name of common sense were

we doing on Tuesday? Prrooo! Didn't feel like the - what

did we do on Monday? Hrroooh."



And finally after a few sessions of wrestling around and it 

gets worse, and it gets horrible, and now you've got half the 

bank found in the wrong GPM, you see, why - auditor gets enough

Suppress off, and the pc gets enough momentary itsa on the

bank and between the two of them, why, they suddenly find

out that "to be a horse" - "to be a horse" was an actual goal

but not an actual GPM, and that "to catch catfish" goal

oppose list is not complete, and that they haven't got a

GPM that they've been running items out of. That, in

addition to jumping a couple of goals, you see. They didn't

jump a couple of goals - they just missed them all, see.



Then all of a sudden - snap, snap, pop, tick, bang! - and no

coronary thrombosis and the room is all level, and you meet

the guy that afternoon and he's saying, "Yabbledee-yabbledee -

yabbledee-yabble. Everything's fine. Everything is fine," 

and so on. He hasn't even found the next goal yet. They just 

found out why, you see. He's fine. Everything's fine.



And you say, "Well, how about that .. ." You can just see

now some medical attendant in some organization who wasn't

in the know, you know. He'd be coming up there with a

little black bag, "Now, Mr. Smith, how is your coronary

thrombosis this afternoon?" The pc says, "Coronary

thrombosis. What coronary thrombosis? You mean actual

goal-osis?"



No. It takes - takes a level of nerve. That's another

comment that we can make on this definition of the common

people, see. We're talking about a Level I, yeah, common

people. But you're talking about - you're talking about way

upstairs stuff when you're talking about Level IV. Don't

kid yourself, now - don't kid yourself.



All you've got to do is make a bum error on the present

time GPM and start running one that ain't it, and your pc's

had it and so have you. And because you won't have a

snowball's chance of getting anyplace. The pc will go into

the creaks. Half a dozen banks should be there.



Do you know how - how far the mistake can be? Do you know

how wide the mistake can be for a present time GPM? How

wide that mistake can be? You can get the fourteenth GPM

from present time registering as the present time GPM. And

then every day or so find a new GPM that's closer to the

present time that is now incontrovertibly the present time

GPM. No slightest argument about it. Every day, find

another one.



And finally discover that when you found that first one

that you were sure was it and that checked out on the

meter - meter rocket read! Present time GPM? Rocket read,

see. Why? Well, actually, you merely found the GPM in which

the pc was most firmly stuck. So, of course, it looks like

a present time GPM. That looks like present time to him - so

of course it registers. Nothing to that. And in addition to

that, GPMs are timeless by construction because of the RI

balance. They float in time like goals, so of course these

GPMs will register as any place. It takes a considerable

trick to date one. And after I've dated a GPM, I always say

"maybe."



You know, done a terrific job of dating with the greatest

care in the world. Everything proved out perfectly that

this GPM was at trillions one hundred to trillions

ninety-one. Proved it conclusively! Well, I will learn out

of that, that probably it is not the present time

GPM - maybe. Because these things - these things, of course,

are constructed to be instantaneous.



Go back to your early material on GPMs. They're

instantaneous. They haven't got any time in them. So of

course you can't date them worth a nickel, so of course you

can make mistakes of this particular character.



Well, I know one case that has had a GPM that people have

been trying - it's perfectly valid GPM - that people have been

trying to run items out of now for a couple of years. Sounds 

like a long time, doesn't it? They haven't found any yet! 

I think they got the top oppterm once. It's probably - It's 

probably fifteen, twenty GPMs from present time!



No, it isn't Suzie. I've got - I've got several pcs that

don't really know they're on my critical list, you know.

But I watch this - I watch this. And I watch people trying

to list for something and find something there and so on.

There, you can't run it. It's just this: You can't run a

GPM that is not the present time GPM! There's only one way

that GPMs can be safely programed, and that's find the

present time GPM without any doubt whatsoever, and then

doubt it, and get its top terminal and oppose it, and run

the - now I'm giving you a different kind of programing

here - and you run that all the way back to the beginning of

track - finding RIs and GPMs in proper sequence - all the way

to the beginning of track without skipping a single pair of

RIs, without repairing anything and without missing a

single goal as you go. Got it? And when you get it all the

way back to the beginning of track, and you get the first

postulate that the pc ever made - let me call that to your

attention; that's prime postulate - when you run this out of

the pc, don't be startled if you see the rafters kind of go

errrrrutah.



When you got that, then you go back and repair it. Go back

and run it all again and find out if there was anything

missing. But listen - if you try to repair it before then,

you won't make it. I've got the later data on this. You

cannot repair a GPM on the run. You just find the RIs for

the next GPM you should be in. It's too horrible for words.

Or you pull RIs out of implants. Or you pull RIs from

elsewhere. You can always repair and find new RIs for a GPM

you just completed. So you don't run them from the top to

the bottom and then go back to the top and repair them.

Because you never go back to the top and repair them. The

only thing that happens is you find RIs out of the next

one, without the goal. See, it's in a horrible mess. So, of

course, you can't take any chances with this thing.



The odd part of it is that if you do it right, it runs off

like a well-oiled dream. It is the most invariable process

anybody ever heard of! It is just like a Swiss watch. It

just runs off perfectly - runs off just exactly according to

R4M2. It's just perfect - I mean there's nothing to it! Like

falling off a log!



But you make one mistake, and now you have five hundred

thousand words required of written material to take care of

the repair. You got it? I mean, to do the process itself is

very, very easy. You make one mistake and you got

complications. It's nothing, for instance, to throw away

three sessions, just because you made a stupid boob in one.

You just can't find out what's happening. It just, "Ooh,

bleah, whoo-my God." And you'll find out it is some stupid

boob error. And then you get errors and then you lose the

error, you know - and then you find what the error was, but

then you lose the error - and you find out that wasn't the

error but something else was the error. You got the idea?



It can get horrible. But the repairs of it are quite

feasible providing they're gone at sensibly. But there is a

way to run them. There isn't much to running them. You can

run them very rapidly. I find an RI every ten minutes of

auditing, routinely - racketa-packeta-packeta-packet. Takes

me about an hour and a half to find a goal on a pc. Next

goal. There's nothing much to this but it's a precision

line of auditing. And it is no line of auditing to be done

by somebody who hasn't got a tremendous grip on auditing

itself, and who is still trying to find out which is the

tone arm - "Oh, that's the tone arm. No wonder I couldn't

find the goals list on the pc. It's kept in the tone

arm, isn't it? I've heard ..." You know? You can't do 

auditing like that.



So you wind up, of course, with Scientology Levels I, II 

and III, which is your professional address to the situation. 

You wind up with Level IV. If you think you're going to go 

out and find goals on the general public, you might as well

just forget it. You're not - that's all. Oh, you can find 

some goals. You can find some implant goals. You could - 

you could mess around with this. They'd say, "What do you 

know? This is unbelievable," and so forth.



You might even do something, accidentally. You might even

do something. But what you'll pay for it in terms of a pc

you can't handle, in terms of a pc who will chicken out, in

terms of a pc whose confront and education don't even

vaguely compare with what he is doing - do not make it

worthwhile. You have now terrific processes at Levels I, II

and III, so you'd better learn all there is to know about

itsa and what makes itsa and all this, and be able to just

sit there cold - knowing nothing much about the pc, you

should be able to sit there cold - plug in your E-Meter,

give a pc the cans and turn on thirty-five divisions of tone

arm in your first two and a half hours on any raw meat pc

in any place. Now why can't you?



And it'll be lack of or noncomprehension of some of this

data like the itsa maker line, see. What is this line?

Well, now you get fouled up as to what this line is and

you're not going to get TA divisions. You know what this

line is, why, it's like a breeze.



Now, let's get back on that. I was just trying to get your

frames of reference in with regard to where this technology

fits. Naturally, this same itsa maker is what's banging in

at the GPMs. It's the same thing you're controlling in

Level IV. But all Level IV is done with formal auditing.

You try to do this other type of auditing and you're going

to lay an egg. You're going to let the pc itsa his own

GPMs? What - how many telegraph poles do you want this pc to

be wrapped around? Plenty!



But, if you are doing Level IV without a complete command

of the pc's communication cycles and communication lines,

you will also wrap him around a telegraph pole.



Now, let me show you some misways of handling this

situation. One is just not understand what it is. And the

other is have some wild preconceived idea or - even some

Scientology datum magnified out of all proportion,

magnified out of all proportion to its actual relationship,

such as "pcs never answer the auditing command." So there

of course, you can never trust this itsa maker line. See?

You can never trust it. So therefore, you transpose the

itsa maker line over to your meter. So you do nothing but

ask the meter what is going on with the pc; never ask the

pc. You have now effectively shut off the pc's itsa maker

line from aud - from the pc as a thetan to his own bank - 

that line. That's the itsa maker line, see? And you've cut 

that line. By doing what? By trying to read it all out from

underneath the pc.



Now, the meter actually can operate as a sort of thetan.

You and the meter can be a sort of a substitute thetan.

You realize that? You got a bank sitting across the table

from you, and you by putting in whatsits can kick things

that - in the bank that read that the pc isn't perceiving.

Well, this is absolutely vital at IV, which is why I've

spent some time talking about IV - because all of IV and GPMs

are sub-itsa. The itsa maker line playing over the tops of

these things sees a bunch of black Alps - but the meter and

the auditor can undercut that bank, since they are not

influenced by those direct and immediate bumps and the

significances in them.



So they can undercut these things and find out what goal it 

is, because it rocket reads while the pc is still wondering

what goal it is. Yes, but you can get too much of that kind 

of thing too, very, very easily. You can say, "Well, me and 

the meter know and the pc doesn't know. So therefore, there's 

no sense in paying any attention to the pc." So we cut his 

itsa maker. And we find session by session his R-factor drops 

on his bank. We try to do it all very mechanically. We should 

do it mechanically, but we do it mechanically by cutting his

line. Now, we'd have to have a wild idea of what this line

is, in order to pull such goofs as this. We say to the pc,

we say, "Well, give me - give me a goal now on this list."



And the pc gives you a goal on the list and so forth, and

you're asking the pc, "Is it an actual GPM .. ." - you're

asking via the meter, see - "Is it an actual GPM or is it an

implant GPM or something?"



And the pc pipes up and he says, "You know, I think this is

an implant GPM. I can see the Helatrobus Implant areas.

Yeah, I think it's an implant GPM."



Now here's the way to cut the rug right out from underneath

the pc, see, is say, "All right. Thank you. Thank you. Is

it an actual GPM? Is it an imp..."



All right. Here's another way to cut the rug out from

underneath the pc: "Oh, I think," he says - you're asking

these questions of the meter and the pc answers them,

see - and the pc says, "I think it's a - it's an actual - I

think it's an implant GPM because I can see the Helatrobus

Implant areas. I mean they're right here. I can see them."

And the auditor says, "Oh, all right. Well, is it also an

actual GPM?" And the pc says, "I - I don't think so. I

really don't think it is." "All right. You mind if I check

it on the meter?" "No, no. Go ahead."



"All right. Is it an implant GPM? Is it an actual GPM? I

get a read here also it's an actual GPM. What do you think

about that?"



"Well, it could be. Yeah, as a matter of fact, it probably

is. Oh, that's what that damn big black mass is floating

over there - that's it." You understand?



But we know of the existence of this itsa maker line, you

see. We know of the existence· of the line between thetan

we're auditing and his bank. We know of the existence of

that line.



Now watch the first one again. "Is it an actual GPM? Is it 

an implant GPM?"



Pc says, "You know, I think this is an implant GPM. I can

see the Helatrobus Implant grounds here."



"Oh, yes. Well, thank you. Thank you. Is it an actual GPM? 

An implant GPM?"



Now what, in effect, have you done? What have you in effect

done? You"ve cut the itsa communication line, you have not

permitted an itsa to flow on it, you have invalidated the

thing that he is looking at and you have cut his

communication line to his own bank. Now, don't sit around

afterwards and wonder why you have an ARC break. You know,

that's how many lines are cut by this simple, stupid

action.



And yet you say, "It's the most obvious action in the

world." And you say, "Well, Level IV is a very mechanical

process. And you should do it just bangbang-bang!" See? And

all right, you're doing it bang-bang-bang! What gets in

your road? This itsa maker line from the pc to his own

bank. That gets in your road terribly! And you've also

heard that you mustn't let him wander around on the

backtrack because he'll overrestimulate himself and you

won't get any tone arm action, see. So every time you find 

him looking at the backtrack, drop your E-Meter. See, get 

his attention - get his attention over on you!

    

And you won't get any TA. Youll just have ARC breaks

galore, all the time! So just start inspecting the number

of things you could do with a careless action of that

particular character. You just refuted what he said, is

what it looks like in the first place, but you'll be

surprised the nuances that can exist with this sort of

thing.



Now, it isn't for you simply to be careful, careful,

careful from here on out not to commit these crimes. That

is the wrong approach. You just know what it is and know

how to handle it. Even a nitroglycerin expert gets so he

takes a pint of a - flask of the stuff and shoves it in his

hip pocket and goes out for a ride on a rocky road in an

old Ford. And he never gets blown up. It's always somebody

who wanders in carefully and stumbles over the cork that

somebody's left around, see. That's the person that gets

blown up, see?



You just move yourself up into the category of the

nitroglycerin expert, that's all. You're handling very

deadly stuff. All right - know what it is. Examine it. Get

familiar with it. And you won't go on being careful all the

time not to cut the pc's itsa line - you just won't. And on

occasion you may find good reason to do so. You know what's

going on.



Now, all sorts of things - things we used to call intuition,

an intuitive sense - can suddenly be born in you just like

that. You suddenly develop the facility of seeing that the

pc is looking at something. You don't just neglect the

whole existence of this itsa maker line. You just don't

neglect the whole existence of the bank and just keep

running it on the meter, running it on the meter, see. You

glance up sideways with this walleyed look, one eye on the

meter and the other on the pc, you see - with the reflection

of the retina, this is done. And you notice - you notice

that the pc is introverted. And you will know exactly what

he's doing - he's looking at a piece of the bank. So you

won't keep wondering if the pc has said everything he

wanted to say about something. You'll have developed the

facility of taking a look at the pc and see that he's

looking at something and leave him alone until he's through

looking at it.



And he'll be sitting there - and actually - actually, it's

quite visible. The pc's sitting there and he's looking at

you and he's rather foggy-eyed most of the time, let us

say, since he's somewhat introverted. And you say, "All

right, now. Is this your item?" Or "Is that the problem

that you were worried about at that time?" Or whatever the

hell it is you're asking him. It doesn't matter, see. And

you're saying this to·him, "Is that your item?" And the pc

goes sort of, "Uh, yeah. Yeah. I think it is." See?



And you just get so you can tell. You hear me? You just get

so you can tell when that inspection is taking place and

not go, "Yeaow-yeaow-yeaow! Bark-bark-bark! Eba-eba-eba!

Yelp-yelp-yelp, yap-yap-yap-yap-yap-yap-yap!" 



Why do I say that? Because some auditors remind me of terriers 

or something of the sort of thing. What do they do? It's

actually just like - if you visualized a piece of string over

here from a thetan to his bank - it almost seems to the pc

as though the second he starts to put this piece of string

down to his bank, the auditor reaches over, grabs the end

of it very hastily and puts it out here on the auditor.

"This is where it ought to be. Now, what did you think about 

that? Where's the - why - why aren't you itsaing anything?" 

Got ahold of the piece of string, see? "Why aren't you 

itsaing anything? Now, I'11 put - put your - put this piece 

of string down on some part of your bank and tell me something 

about it. No, I'm not going to let it go. You just put it .. ."



The pc goes, "Oh, my God - what's happening to me?" you see.

"What's happening?" Well, what's happening to him is, is

the itsa maker line is being carefully held out - carefully

pulled out from any possibility of bank inspection - and the

pc is being given whatsits. That's the actual situation. It

isn't that the pc - it looks to the pc, and he will say,

that the auditor is asking whatsits and he's not being

permitted to answer. That's what he usually feels is

happening and that actually is usually not what is

happening. The auditor is perfectly willing to have him

answer. But the auditor's putting in whatsits while not

permitting the pc to look for the answer in the bank. The

auditor's carefully keeping this string from thetan to bank

pulled out so that the bank end of the string is over here

on top of the E-Meter, or into the session. And of course,

your pc's out of session all the time, all the time, all

the time. What's the definition of session, see? It's only

willing to talk to the auditor. Just willing, you know. Not

talking to the auditor. Just willing. And it's really

not - and that definition could be revised and made

better - it's not just "interested in own case," but

"passing this inspection line over his own case"-not

passing it over the auditor of the session.



TBD



Now, one of the things that you get as an auditor is when

you've grabbed this line inadvertently - and oh, count on

the fact that you're going to make two or three blunders

with this per session when you are a complete expert, see.

Actually profess - perfection on this is unobtainable

because you're going along at a mad rate and you're trying

to push along through and get a goals list finished by the

end of the session or you're trying to sort out a service

facsimile, little list that you have in front of you, don't

you see?



And actually in Level IV - Level IV particularly - your

nulling is done "Bark, bark, bark, bark, bark, bark,

bark, bark." There are very few auditors can talk as fast

as the meter can respond on nulling. You just get it out of

your mouth and you're reading the next one, see. There's

that tenth-of-a-second pause to let the meter read. Didn't

read - that tenth-of-a-second told you so, you've said it

very fast and very rapid. Man, I tell you, a good

auditor - a good auditor can take a cracking awful big list

and just mow it down, man.



And you're going down this list - and all of a sudden, why,

the pc says, "Hey! I - I thought of another - I thought of

another - I thought of another item. It's 'a cat whisker.' "

See? Something like this.



And you're intent on going down the list. And the pc - you

don't - you don't really get the pc's lift of his head, you

see, and his "going to tell you," see. And if you just

missed it entirely, you'd get a hell of an ARC break - but

you pick it up just a little bit late, you sec. It's just a

little bit crude and crummy and you realize you've slid

over the last ten nulling items without the pc's attention

on the list or something wild - it's usually the last two or

three, don't you see. You've goofed it up one way or the

other.



Well, no matter how perfect you are, you're going to goof

it up sometimes or another. Pc's going to be sitting there

and you'd swear he was bright, bushy-tailed, right up in

PT, answering the end of session, and then my God! He was

examining - he was examining his session goals and you were

trying to ask him about his gains. You've overridden the

pc's comm line. It's how adroitly you can wiggle out of

what you get into, that is the mark of the expert. It's not

staying out of everything.



Most of my auditing is highly swift and effective simply

because it is very brassy. I know I can get a pc out of

anything I get the pc into. And I know I'm not going to get

the pc into any more than I can possibly help. So

therefore, it just adds up to a "to hell with it." And I

just know the factors I am dealing with and I shift those

things round in a session - click, click, click, bing, bang.

So this particular pair didn't quite mesh over here in the

corner and the pc said, "Rrrrrr." And I'11 trace it back to

some auditing error I just made two seconds ago and so

forth, patch the thing up in a hurry and I'm off and away,

see.



One thing I do that I hope you will be able to acquire

someday is spot the birth of an ARC break upwards to an

hour and a half before it happens. Please develop that

facility. Know - don't be so reasonable!



********** continued in part 3 **********