From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Fri Jul 23 16:32:07 1999

Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.gctr.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news

Date: 23 Jul 1999 23:32:07 -0000

Subject: FZ Bible 1/10 HCL LECTURES - FINAL SECTION

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

Message-ID: <30f9be9d3be8af8d78a0d8703d51ab2a@anonymous.poster>

Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to

	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity

	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.

From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net

Lines: 922

Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:885930 alt.clearing.technology:91934



FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



HCL LECTURES - FINAL SECTION 1/10



**************************************************



HCL LECTURES - FINAL SECTION (Mar-April 1952)



CONTENTS:



1.  THE SUCCESS OF DIANETICS

2.  HCL-23 THETA BODIES

3.  HCL-21 ANATOMY OF THE THETA BODY

4.  HCL-22 HOW TO AUDIT A THETA LINE, PARTS I AND II

5.  HCL-25 AN ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND HUMAN ABBERATION, PART I

6.  HCL-26 AN ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND HUMAN ABERRATION, Part II

7.  HCL-27 HOW TO SEARCH FOR INCIDENTS ON THE TRACK, PART I

8.  HCL-27A HOW TO SEARCH FOR INCIDENTS ON THE TRACK, PART II

9.  HCL-DEMO: THETA BODY DEMONSTRATION

10. APPENDIX



Note that HCL-27 includes HCL-18.



Dates and tape renumbering here are complex.  See the Appendix

and the beginnings of the individual tapes.  Other lectures

may be missing and are not in the R&Ds, especially HCL-23A

"Impulses of a Thetan" and HCL-24A "Theta Bodies".  But tape

HCL-24 is assumed to be either HCL-12A or HCL-6 Spec.



Previously posted in this series:



FZ BIBLE 1/4 HPC TAPES 1952 (Fdn Business & HofM Incidents)

  [These are an introduction to the HCL series]



FZ BIBLE 1/10 HCL TAPES of 1952, FIRST SECTION

  [HCL-1 to 6A]



FZ BIBLE 0/10 HCL TAPES PART 2 (1952)

  [HCL-7 to 17]



FZ BIBLE 1/4 TIME TRACK OF THETA  

  [HCL 19 and 20]



FZ BIBLE - BATTLE OF THE UNIVERSES - CONFIDENTIAL TAPE

  [HCL-Spec]



This coveres the entirity of all material from the middle of

New R&D Vol. 9 to the middle of New R&D Vol 10 as well as much

material that was omitted from the R&Ds.  Immediately after 

this in New R&D 10 are the Route To Infinity lectures (Tech 

80 lectures) which we posted last year.





**************************************************



STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************







THE SUCCESS OF DIANETICS



Alternate Title (per Flag Master List):

PHOENIX TALK ABOUT WICHITA AND PURCELL



A lecture given on 15 April 1952



[This lecture is not really part of the HCL series but was given

when the College was moved from Witchita to Phoenix.  The

Flag Master List places the final HCL lectures in March in

Witchita, but the R&D volumes place HCL-21 onwards in Phoenix

in mid April immediately after this lecture.  The tapes 

themselves do not have exact dates.]



[This transcript is based exclusively on R&D 10.  We do not 

have a copy of this tape.  Considering that statements about

organizational business are the ones most often cut by Bridge

from the transcripts, this lecture should be carefully checked

against the reel if anybody has it.]



[According to the R&D volume, the recording begins with the

lecture already in progress.]





.. know if I wanted to be introduced, so I'd like

to - like to introduce you to L. Ron Hubbard. And (laugh)

he - couple of years ago, much to his sorrow - issued a book

called Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, And

he looked much younger then, and by using the newest and

latest techniques of processing, and using them practically

eight hours a day, he is barely able to keep up with the

amount of deterioration. (laughter)



I am very happy to see you all and I'm very happy to be

here in Phoenix,



Maybe you'd like to know something about why, and what it's

all about, and maybe get some straight dope.



The whole plan of operation in the past two years has, in

the main, been in the hands of, well, "business people," I

think they call themselves, occasionally. And although I

was not without influence in the organizations, and

although I did not occasionally make mistakes in the

organizations, which I very definitely did, at the same

time my entire and complete concentration actually was on

research - advancing the line of research.



During the first four or five months of Dianetics, it's

very interesting that I didn't get one single scrap of new

material down. Nothing. I got nothing written. And by

October of 1950, although many new techniques had been

developed, none of these had been codified into a

publication of any kind, Everything that was being

published was very old. This was October 1950. In October

of 1950 I said, "I'm through with management; this is the

end as far as management is concerned. Because it is

impeding something which is far more important, and that is

having techniques which work far, far better in more and

more hands." Because by this time many occluded cases were

turning up which were "uncrackable" by even the better auditors. 

It was up to me to find out what on earth I had been doing. 

This hadn't happened to me. And I found out that Dianetics

itself was a sort of a crosswise education which would jam

up a case.



So in October of 1950 I resigned from business and started

in trying to back up enough to put techniques together. In

December, early January - in  December  I tried  to  write  

Science  of  Survival  in  Los Angeles; I couldn't do it. 

So I went down to Palm Springs and started to write it. 

All hades started to break loose one way or the other in 

the field of management. I backed up, trying to write 

Science of Survival, clear to Cuba. That's a fact. And I 

sat down there and I wrote Science of Survival and I

said, "There's a book. Okay. There's the Tone Scale. Okay.

Now, what can I do to sort of bail myself out of this!"

Because in my absence very many strange things had

happened. And a fellow by the name of PurcelL had made an

arrangement with one of the trustees of the old New Jersey

Foundation to establish a Foundation in Wichita. They

phoned the data down to me, and by this time I was pretty

sick. And, as a matter of fact, chat's literally true. And

I told Mr. Purcell that yes, it was all right with me. He

had made some sort of a verbal statement to me, November

before. He said, "If anything happens to the Foundations,

if you loan the word Dianetics, its processes, and your

name to one in Wichita - be very, very happy to straighten

this out."



So I thought this was fine and I got in there. And under

this consideration that the word Dianetics, its processes

and so on and my name would be loaned to a local

Foundation, incorporation was drawn up there called "The

Hubbard Dianetic Foundation Incorporated of Wichita."



One of the stipulations in this: that all debts were to be

paid, all debts of existing Foundations and the entire

business structure of Dianetics was to be straightened out.



June, July, August came without this having happened. And

one day I was very startled to find out that the Hubbard

Dianetic Foundation Incorporated of Wichita, Kansas, was in

receivership. I was sitting over in Manney's print shop

over at the Wichita Publishing Company. "They're in court;

they're in receivership," There was no defense put up

against receivership. I was stunned. So I worked everything

I could possibly work in order to get things down on the

line, because I found out that any document or contract

which I had tried to issue and get agreed upon had not been

issued properly. Everything was fouled up like fire drill,

as we used to say in the Navy.



In September, I told the Foundation there that I was going

to leave - they were kaput as far as I was concerned - unless

they snapped to on an agreement. And they finally issued me

a paper which stated in so many words that Dianetics,

Hubbard, processes, were on loan to the Hubbard Dianetic

Foundation of Wichita, Kansas; that all my copyrights were

mine, and that nobody of the old Foundation (it was signed

by the remaining trustee of the old Foundation) and the new

Foundation (as represented by Don G. Purcell) knew of

anything that would impede this or knock it out or do

anything to it at all, And they signed that paper.



October: I couldn't get any accounting. November: I was

flat broke. December: I couldn't get any accounting. I

couldn't find out what was happening in the Foundation,

January came and things had gotten so bad on a businesswise

standpoint that I was completely out of communication with

the Foundation. I tried to install a school. They didn't

want my school; they thought something or other, something

or other.



Well, it was pretty rough. I see two or three faces here

who know what I am saying is fairly straight.



And when it came to the 12th of February, I threw in the

sponge and I said, "1 am resigning from this organization

because I don't know what's going on, and I don't want to

be liable any further for this organization." And by the

way, I'd contemplated this since early January.



And the only thing that happened after that, actually, was

the fact that all of a sudden the Foundation went into

bankruptcy. Bang! It went into voluntary bankruptcy. This

wiped out every dime the Foundation owed me. And by the

way, that was the total indebtedness of the Foundation - was

money owed to L. Ron Hubbard, because Don G. Purcell had

taken any monies he'd put into the Foundation, and he had

that in the form of a corporate note. And although he

carried it on record, that was it. And there was one small

debt of five thousand dollars owed to a lady who was - to 

whom Dianetics is very indebted, and that's Mrs. Carney, now 

Mrs. Campbell, back East. She gave the Foundation five 

thousand dollars to start it out with. And that note had 

been repudiated; nobody had even corresponded with her. 

So that appeared.



Then there was a bogus suit on it, that nobody ever

intended to do anything about, on a rental property (this

was all in litigation - never would have come up) and my

note and any and all sums owed me for books and royalties

and so on.



Well, there went the Foundation. In the interim I'd started

an organization known as "Hubbard College" in an effort to

try to teach this subject properly. And a very short time

ago I started to negotiate a lease on Hubbard College there

in Wichita, I don't know what they're doing. We - Jim and I

are not responsible for its management. We hope they will

go ahead and conduct a good and adequate professional

school and that they will be able to bring people up to the

point where they can be granted a Bachelor of Dianetics.



But as far as the old Foundation is concerned, the word

Foundation itself and the other words connected with

Dianetics with which you're familiar -  these words happen

to be, fortunately, personal property.  They are maybe

contestable in court,  but my name isn't contestable in

court. That is to say, whether or not I own the name

Hubbard and can loan it to organizations, that's

not - that's not contestable.



And copyright - US government copyright licenses are not

contestable. That is to say, an organization either is

licensed to publish your books or it isn't. And when an

organization that isn't licensed to publish books insists

on grabbing manuscripts and publishing them and even

issuing copyrights on them for themselves, they have let

themselves in for a misdemeanor called fraudulent

copyrighting: US Government Statute Copyright Law number

blankety-blank-blank; date: something-or-other, 1919.



And although you see an enturbulence in this quarter, this

move of moving out of Wichita and into an area where

Dianetics could be stabilized has been under contemplation

for a long time. Ross and I have talked about it; a lot of

us talked about it.



Another thing is, Wichita is a bomb target. It is sitting

in the middle of all of these beautiful defense plants and

airplane plants and so forth, and Dianetics doesn't belong

there.



So, it has been my contention for a long, long time that

Dianetics did not have to be sold at one gallon of blood

per lesson. And that's one of the main faults I had with

it. The continuing expenses in Dianetics are actually the

expenses of research, and out in the field, the expenses of

living and maintenance of staff and offices on the part of

auditors who are doing good in the public. Now these things

can be paid for.



So, the research line is paid for by books - when and if I

can collect my royalties off an organization publishing

them. So we're in the publishing business right here in

Phoenix.



Of course, the old books have a lot of material in them,

but new books have that material codified and assembled

more properly. And these new books I am writing at a speed

that I have to keep a water spray going on the back end of

my typewriter to keep it from smoking and the platen

burning up!



And we've got - the first issues of these books will be out

on a mimeograph machine. Jim, without using a blackjack or

anything - I don't know how he did it - suddenly appeared on

the scene with a big electric mimeograph machine. That's

lifeblood as far as we're concerned, We're doing it all

with nothing - from scratch.



This is just as bad, by the way, as Dianetics, 1949, when I

would go around to various doctors and associations and try

to interest them in this and say it can do something for

you. And I'd go home and I would break out my typewriter

and feed in a few pages of paper, and I would write a story

for somebody and get in a check and do some more research

in Dianetics. And we're just about on that parity of operation.



But we've got something more; we've got something a lot

more. Going to put in a free course in Phoenix, somehow or

other, by some necromancy. Now this is quite important. I

talked to Gordon over here, and Gordon - we talked about a

summary course and so forth - I didn't hear much more about

it and I kept thinking and thinking and thinking, and all

of a sudden it occurred to me, "What is one of these

courses?" Well, if you have a package of tapes which are

highly codified and they are accompanied by text for each tape,

and you've got a schedule and somebody to operate a tape

machine and to announce what this next lecture is and what

the study period is and what the seminar question is, you

can have a classroom which is practically self-operative.



ALongside of that you run another classroom that plays

nothing but an introductory lecture, and this introductory

lecture just goes off every night on schedule. It's sort of

like you set a time clock and it keeps going off on

schedule. Now, that introductory lecture is for people who

just wander in and want to know what is Dianetics. I don't

care where these quarters are, if they sit out here in a

tent or if we set it up alongside of a power line out here

in the hills. We're talking about - we're talking about this

kind of an operation. It's just someplace where somebody

could go.



All right. There we put in such an institution as a little

psychiatric museum eventually, and we put in a ...

(laughter) That's right. And we put in displays of this and

that and pictures of auditors and stuff, you know. And

people walk in there and there's some free handouts that

they can pick up and that's about the end of that.



And over here - here runs this course. And this course takes

two weeks. And this course has a day school and a night

school. And the day [night] school is organized on this

basis: that it starts in from 8 o'clock - or, pardon me,

about 7:30 at night - and plays on through till about 11:30

with some fifteen-minute breaks, and it just runs off three

tapes of the Summary Course.



Those three tapes are played during the daytime; it starts

off about 8 o'clock in the morning: hour's study period,

hour's lecture, hour's seminar. And it just keeps going

this way so that you've got three tapes. The day school is

different in that it has study periods and seminars. The

night school would actually be a review.



And in this wise, I think we can put together a two-weeks'

professional course (and this - I said "professional

course"; actually, it's a summary course) which will just

go off on schedule: every two weeks it'll start and every

two weeks it'll end. And it'd just keep going like that.



Now, this makes auditor technique rehabilitation a very,

very simple matter. How do you go to this course? Well, you

walk in and you sign a little book and it says "student

roster book." And there's - at practically cost - would be the

pamphlets, because they take printing. You pick up the

pamphlets that go with the lectures and you just go there

every morning, and at the end of two weeks you've gone

through a complete review course.



This, by the way, would not interfere with somebody

teaching a professional course, nor would it even interfere

with somebody in some city teaching a summary course. But

it'd certainly make it possible for an auditor, at

relatively little speed, to drift through here and pick up

what he had to know.



Furthermore, you realize that this course does not offer

any processing to anybody. People come in, they start

through this course; they don't know anything about this,

so it immediately makes a call on the initiative of the

auditors in this area. It says they better have just an

association of some sort and a directory, because people

are going to go to that course and they're going to say, "I

should have some processing on this." In other words,

there'll be processing that'll have to be done in

connection with this course. Nobody wants anything to do

with it. You put together a little association directory

service, and my office answer the phone for you and refer.

Gordon would do the same thing. It's just simple. 



In other words, we're trying to provide a facility.



Now, another thing is, is your introductory lecture. We're

going to be throwing handbooks over the air - that is to

say, probably going to be selling some Handbook for

Preclears over the air, something like this, to interest

people. Your introductory lecture, if it just runs off

every night, one way or the other, will find people coming

in there. There again your auditors' directory service and

so forth could pick up. This is just service, that's all.



The only way that this thing could be supported, of

course - if there's enough book and psychometer sale in

order to pay the rent and pay the salary of the tape

runner - that's about all that you'd ask of this thing, and

I think in that wise the course would balance itself out.



Now, this does not interfere with - and I'm sure you'd agree

if you thought this over - with any existing facilities in

the area. Quite on the contrary. It'd probably pick them up

if anything, since nobody is giving away anything anybody's

selling in the area. We're not giving away any auditing and

so on, but we're stimulating interest. We have another

project going, and we're ready to cut loose on this project

just as soon as we can. Los Angeles is probably going to

hit Arizona in an atom bombing. The Southwest is probably a

part of the country to which many people will drift (after

an atom bombing). There's no reason why Arizona should

suddenly have to roll up its sleeves and start working to

support everybody who drifts in on Arizona.



H. G. Wells in Things to Cone solved this problem merely by

shooting all these wayfarers who came down the highway.

(audience laughter) But we can make it more or less

pointless if we could do something like this - we have this

already in the mills - we have some very key personnel in

civil defense alerted on this and uery, very interested.



Organize an organization called "The Samaritans,

Incorporated." And we issue them a card. We sell them, if

you please, food, clothing and shelter on their arrival in

this area, and we try to make it possible for - after a

short period of time - for there to be some kind of work or

activity here which could keep them eating in the event of

an atom bombing. Fairly sensible solution to this.



By the way, I'm not terribly foreign to this, because I'm a

graduate of the Princeton military school of government on

civil affairs, which is the naval version of civil defense.

It was highly specialized. And it's going to be a big

problem. We'd just be inundated by people in Arizona if

they aren't very much on the ball about doing something

about it.



Well, what happens is we can sell this. We can sell a card

that says, "This entitles you to food, clothing and

shelter, and it's got your thumbprint on it. All you have

to bring is your thumb. And you report in on this area ..." 

Particularly between here and Los Angeles you can put in

some gasoline and water stations. And you start making a

storage - that is to say, a dump, actually, of supplies.

This card isn't cheap. But it's going to take a lot of

people to get this organization - keep it rolling, and work

with it and stay with it.



And it's not too far out of line with Dianetic goals. One

of the main reasons I thought about this is auditors in

this area. We need things to do, we need something that

produces income, and I've been trying to solve this problem

any way I could. I, for some reason or other, feel

responsible on it.



Now, what do you think of these plans? We're trying to pull

a hill here. All the funds that were available in

Dianetics are gone by the boards. There isn't any. For

instance, my books that are being sold out of Wichita right

now - if I ever see a dime out of those, I will be very,

very surprised. Very surprised.



This is a new page, a new show. And I'm personally - I'm

very glad of it because a lot of the people in management

and so forth this took off the back of our necks will be

very healthy to Dianetics. Don't think that it won't. I'm

looking at a couple of faces here that just quit cold on

account of management in another area.



We don't want management; what we want is action and

activity. And I think we'll be able to pull the hill here

pretty well. I don't want any existing organization,

planning agency or anything to get the idea that we are

trying to steal any shows. Let's get together and cooperate

for a change.



We got a terrtfic target; we got a big target. I looked at

a map of the United States the other day and it said that

there were a hundred and fifty million people in it and

there was a lot of land there and so on.



As a unified, solidified front without all this argument,

and without some wild man someplace telling us how

Dianetics has got to make a million bucks a minute so that

he can buy six more Cadillacs for his wife or something - we

can make this show run. I know that. Do you know I've never

been able to give Dianetics away? Every time I've ever

tried to give Dianetics away, the MEST keeps moving in

under it and then you start having trouble with the MEST,

And if you just remember not to take too much of the MEST,

you're all set. But it's very dangerous.  It's very

dangerous,  for instance, to walk down the street and

start tapping people on the shoulder who are crippled or

blind or something of the sort and start doing something

for them, because if you start such an operation, it's just

like chain fission. I don't know how many of you ever had

nerve enough to do that. Just walk down the street and tap

somebody on the shoulder that's walking along on crutches

and say, "My address is so-and-so. Come on over to the

house," And he says, "Why?" "Well, I'm going to take you

off your crutches." "What are you, a preacher or something

of the sort?" "No? No, I operate in the field of

science - has to do with the mind. And we do this quite

regularly. Now, what is your phone number just in case you

don't come?" He'll give it to you. They've spooked.



When they appear, you take them off the crutches. You could

even take only 50 percent of them off the crutches and

you'd be in fine shape.



Now, I wanted to give you just a brief briefing on what

we're trying to do, and not only what we're trying to do,

what's happening, because this stuff that I'm talking to

you about is happening like chain Lightning. Going to need

help. And the most help we can need and the most help we

can use is a good, smooth, calm level of agreement and some

ARC for a change all across the line. Good, calm activity,

because I am sure that in Dianetics we have a target and a

goal that'll fit any capability or skill which we have in

all the field of Dianetics. I know this.



In the past, what people continually tried to do was pull

it all together here, and say, "It's mine! It's mine; I own

it! This is it, and you'll have to give me a million

dollars before you get this thing," and so forth.



Dianetics, to a very, very limited extent, is mine by sole

virtue of production. I've tried to keep it on an even keel

so I could keep producing. I don't think anybody will argue

about my production. And that's just the sole reason why I

exercise any ownership in this field. I don't want to see

somebody messing it up before I get into a situation where

I can say, "Okay, that's it; now I'm going fishing!" You

see what my stand is.



Well, I imagine - I don't know, I haven't seen any of the

mailings out of Wichita; I don't know what's going on in

Wichita - I imagine some of you are confused to some degree

about all this. But I can assure you of one thing: you're

nowhere near as confused as I am about it!



You get up one morning and somebody is on the phone saying,

"We just went into bankruptcy. What are you going to do

now?" I say, "You what? Why?"



And they say, "Well, there's just hundreds of thousands of

dollars in debts." Grim!



Well, all to that - due respect, let's get on to something

constructive.



Some of you have listened, lately, to the Summary Course.

Now, that was a pretty brutal rundown - that many lectures

at that rate of speed. 



Female uoice: Uhh. 



Yeah, "Uhh" is right.



But I am very glad - I am very glad that you listened to that 

rundown for this adequate reason: because if we start putting

in a course which is about the same size and shape as that

course, which is running off slowly, and people start

walking into this course that want some tips or they want a

little - buy some processing from you or something of the

sort - you are an advanced line, now, that knows what this

thing consists of. And that's absolutely necessary before

you suddenly start something running. Because don't worry,

you'll be drifting around the classroom, and they'll be

saying, "Oh, you're an HDA. Oh you - you know about this

stuff?" And you can say, "Well, ..." (audience laughter)



I'm not saying that you didn't know about it all before,

but this particular package called this Summary Course is a

codification which makes it, actually, to a large degree a

different sort of a looking article, because  it's  all 

packaged up - it's got cellophane on it now - and it says 

over here that this is A and B and C and D and E and F.



Now, the lectures and so forth that some of you poor people

have listened to by me...  You come down on Monday night

down in Wichita there and say, "All right, now it's like

this" See? And I tell you, "Well now, it's so-and-so and

so-and-so, and the Code of Honor Processing, and you know

about Effort Processing, but we'll cover that next week,"

so to speak.



Nothing organized: it went E, G, X, Q, B, C! And I was

listening to some of those tapes and trying to look them

over as to sequence, and boy, there was just nothing in

sequence all fall! There was nothing but new data, new

data, new data, new data - it just kept falling down. Well,

I can't help it; it kept falling into my lap. And the

only thing I could do was to give it to you as I got it.



Well, I had a little time to breathe because something very

significant has happened. We have moved out of the

mechanics stage. Mechanics are buttoned up. Nothing

mechanical about the mind or thought has now shown up for

about two and a half or three months.



Mechanics, I'm talking about: "How do you process? How do

you handle a facsimile? What is a facsimile? What is

emotion? What is effort? What kind of efforts are there?

How do you handle these? How are they packaged up? What is

unconsciousness? What is ..." You know? Well, I'm talking

about mechanics. There it is; there's nothing been added 

to it. That Monday night's lecture when I said, "Well, 

there's thought, emotion and effort," from that time on, 

it - just within two or three weeks - formed a button-up,

and that was the package. Now it's sort of rote. These are

the tools.



We have proceeded, now, just using these tools. What is the

function of the mind, and how does it operate and how do

you put it back into another form of operation? Or how do

you put it over here into a completely different form of

operation? We've answered those questions.



But by taking these processes - I've gone exploring, and all

I'm looking at now and all I'm working with is

incident - incident in the history of man. What are the

incidents that are important, and what's the history of

man? And that's all I'm looking at as far as a technique of

processing. As far as thought, emotion, effort, engrams,

all the rest of this stuff - locks, secondaries, how do you

run them, what are the techniques to be applied and so on?

Complete package. I don't think we'll see any change in it.

I haven't seen any reason to change it for a long time.



So, there we have all the tools and how you use them. Now,

it's just a question of this: Are there some incidents

around to which you can apply these tools which suddenly

bring a tremendous amount of resolution into a case? Now,

what's the incident? What is the best incident to run?

That's the whole thing: what is the best incident to run?



And I'm doing you a map; it's called a track map. And I've

been working on it rather constantly here. And it just has

to do with just about all the incidents that are important

on the line.



That is to say - now these are being checked against an

electropsychometer, they're being checked against

preclears, and they're being checked against a very large

body of data. So all we're doing is selecting targets,

selecting targets. And you'll find out that an

electropsychometer becomes more and more important to you

because you have these incidents. There's this type of

incident and that type of incident and that type of

incident. And to get your swiftest results you just say,

"Incident One, Two or Three?" You throw a guy on the

psychometer and you - it's "Two." "Ah, Two." You don't have

to worry about it any further - you can run "Two."



Furthermore, the incidents we're getting into are

terrifically standardized. Boy, have there been a lot of

1.5's or something back on the - boy, really routine. You

know, they said, "Well, this is the way we go," and then

they handled the civilization or they handled this just

exactly in this fashion and they didn't vary a hair, Like 

Service Facsimile One: that thing is just gorgeous as a 

piece of routine.



There's two kinds of it - the wide-open case has one kind

and the occluded case has another kind - two kinds.

Variation very slight. The incident varies from person to

person, really, only with the intent with which he went

into the incident. Some people went into it saying, "Urrrr?

I'm really going to find out about this and tell

everybody." And some went in and said, "Oh goody, goody,

I'm going to - I'm going to become very religious." And some

went into it saying, "Well, what's the use?" and so on, So

you get this intent underlying the incident and so the

incident changes in complexion and its operation on the

individual, That's about all there is to it.



So, we're getting targets, Targets. Now, as soon as I get

this track map drawn and a little book called "Principal

Incidents" - it's a description of each one of these

incidents, and each type of incident that fits on the track

map.



Well, I wish I had more time to do this job because I would

do the whole job if I could and finish it all off. Well,

instead of this, what I'm going to have to do is issue the

track map to you guys and issue these books and let you do

some checking. In the meantime the thing will be going out

to the field, so that we'll have track map issue five,

track map issue six, issue seven. The incidents which

appear on there will always be there, but there may be some

spook incidents in between that have greater importance.

And the outline of the incidents, of course, will vary if

auditors will just jot down what their preclear is running,

regardless of whether it's little green men suddenly

growing horns or what it is, and send it in. In this way,

let's get a nice coordination, see?



You see, we're looking at end of track right now on

Dianetic research. We're sitting in a grandstand seat

looking at end of track; it's coming right up. I don't know

how many strings will be left undone after August, but I

would say offhand that August is practically deadline,

unless something like an atom bombing or something happens,

of the sort. I can look at the scope of all this and I've

been handling it for a long time, and I look at it and all

of a sudden it's a sphere, It doesn't go off over thataway; 

it doesn't lead on and on. You don't keep looking over there 

at the horizon and then you run like the devil and you get

over there and you see this big range of mountains and

there's nothing there and you look and you see the next

horizon and the next horizon and the next horizon. Well,

what we've done is meet ourselves coming back and so we can

do such an adventurous thing as drawing a track map.



And some more good news on this line of research: there are

specific incidents on the track whereby the individual

desired a certain thing to take place. The incident was

such that he desired of his own free will - although he was

forced to desire this, you might say - but circumstances

were such that he was just forced to desire this. For

instance, "to want experience." The individual wants

experience. Well, that makes him start collecting these

facsimiles, you know, and considering they're very valuable

and holding them over here in a little ball.



And there's incidents where he "wants to be together." And

about the main reason to run these, it suddenly works out

to a fact that there are only so many desires that are

aberrative and, evidently, an individual at each point on

the track has picked up another one of these desires until

he's got all the desires to be aberrated. The main purpose

in running these incidents, then, is to knock out this.



For instance, why would a person want to be in a grouper?

Well, you can hammer away at groupers and separate groupers

and do things to groupers and just endlessly to some

people, and they're still - the next week you see them,

they've picked up another grouper. Now, why do they have

this thing? Why do they want this track ballup? Because it

boils down to the fact they must want it someplace.



Well, we go back on the track and we look and we look and

we look, and finally in examining incidents we find out

where they wanted to be a group - where they wanted to be a

group. There is the grouper, because after that everything

had a tendency to fall in on that point. That one gets

restimulated, everything falls in on it. There's your

grouping. You see how neatly this is working out?



Another thing is you've had trouble in the past (person to

person) with people, for instance, who were paralyzed from

the waist down or paralyzed on one side or had a twitch or

something. Wouldn't you love to have a - oh, three-, four-,

five-hour technique that'd knock it out - something at the

outside, three, four, five hours. Well, I'm looking right

at that technique. It's very simple. It's just a new

address of what we knew about theta, and it had to do with

discovering what is the anatomy of the theta body. The

anatomy of the theta hodv is a different subiect than the

anatomy of the MEST body, and when examined you find out 

that the theta body monitors certain parts of the MEST body.



What is the anatomy, then, of the theta body, and do you

have to adjust anything in the theta body? Well, if you

just adjusted something in the theta body instead of

adjusting the MEST body, then the theta body would adjust

the MEST body. Very simple. You just short-circuit this

thing, in other words. Instead of working so hard on this

MEST body and getting thoughts and incidents and so forth

and what they're doing, what you do is work with the theta

body to make it do it. And that's very simple: the anatomy

of the theta body.



The next little trick that is coming up here very soon is a

very fascinating little trick that I probably shouldn't

mention. (laughter) What's the matter? 



Female voice: You're going to!



Well, as a matter of fact I almost didn't, because - looking

at a fellow that I promised I wouldn't! Can I have that

promise back? 



Male uoice: Sure. All right.



And that is to say, on the business of clearing; we're

looking at the Theta Clear. The Theta Clear is a distinct

possibility. It's so distinct as a possibility that I'11

give it about ten days for one to show up ... 



Male voice: Possibly.



.. something like that. Theta Clear.



And a Theta Clear auditor can do almost anything he wants

to do with a case. And the mechanics of how he does it are

right now sitting in the form of notes on my desk.

Provable. Very, very interesting. A Theta Clear

auditor - that's what we want. We want an auditor to be able

to walk down the street and see somebody who is having a

bad time, who is cross or crippled or something of the

sort, and the auditor say, "Whsssh!" - guy's all right! We

want an auditor to be able to look at a little crippled kid

in a school, and look at this little crippled kid and say ...

And the little kid's not crippled anymore. That'd be an

interesting phenomenon, wouldn't it? 



Male voice: Yes.



Well, it's unbelievable; it's completely unbelievable - as

unbelievable as Dianetics always has been. We want an

auditor to be able to walk down a hospital ward between

those beds and just have the patients get up as he goes by.

Wouldn't that be interesting? And I'm not saying you'll all

be able to do it in two weeks: some of you it'll take -

three weeks!



One of the boys was out to see me the other night - the

other afternoon - said, "Sometimes I sit up in the air above

my body," so forth. But he comes down again. Now, why does

he come down? Very interesting.



For instance, ask yourself this question: "Is there any

reason why you had to have a body?" Hm? Stop and think

about it for a moment: do you have to have a body? Is most

of your time in this MEST universe dedicated to taking care

of a body? 



Audience: Yes.



Well, it's the body that can't survive, so that brings

about death. But that's all the failure there is, is death

or pain. Isn't that right? So if you didn't have to worry

about a body, but you had a body and so on, then you

wouldn't have to be at all concerned about failure, because

you couldn't fail because the worst that could happen to

you is you'd be killed, and you can always pick up another

body.



I see some of you girls now; somebody like Susan Hayward

or Rita Hayworth, something, walk into a lecture and sit

down. Look at them accusingly: "What did you do with her 

soul?"



Very tough method of identification, by the way, when

people go around stealing bodies and things like that, I

mean, I ... So we'll have to have a code of honor about

this whole thing before I spring it. Well, of course, I'm

just joking - or am I? 



Female voice: You're not. 



Male voice: You're not.



Mm-hm, that's right. You see, some of you have been very

impatient about this and have been ramming around at it and

yow-yowing a little bit in my way because we weren't there,

we weren't doing this, and you knew innatively [ natively

and innately - Ed.] and inherently we could. But you know, 

it was much better to build a very careful bridge to it. 

So we built a bridge through the MEST universe, we built 

a bridge through the MEST body, we built a bridge through 

what you might call "MEST theta," so on, up into the theta 

body, up into the operation of theta itself. And we are 

suddenly standing at a point where we're at theta, now, 

looking back. And it's an interesting viewpoint. For instance, 

your electropsychometer will tell you faster than scat that

there is an enormous difference between a facsimile and a 

theta body. It'll tell you right now, because its needle 

operation is entirely different - entirely different,



Well, I just wanted to give you all the news. Supposing we

take a two-minute breather and I'll give you an hour's talk

on theta bodies if you want me to. You want me to?



Audience: Fine. 



Okay.



[end of lecture]