From nobody@REPLAY.COM Sun May 17 17:55:55 1998

Path: spln!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsfeed.internetmci.com!206.20.110.210!fresh!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news

Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 02:55:55 +0200 (MET DST)

Message-ID: <199805180055.CAA28326@basement.replay.com>

Subject: FZ BIBLE 2/3 ERRORS IN TIME

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)

Organization: Replay Associates, L.L.P.

X-001: Replay may or may not approve of the content of this posting

X-002: Report misuse of this automated service to <abuse@replay.com>

X-URL: http://www.replay.com/remailer/

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Lines: 551

Xref: spln alt.religion.scientology:301196 alt.clearing.technology:38643



FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



TRANSCRIPT OF THE ERRORS IN TIME TAPE 2/3





Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet

are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any

Jewish opinion.



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************





ERRORS IN TIME



St. Hill Special Briefing Course Tape lecture of 18 July 63



6307C18 SHSBC-287 renumbered SHSBC-316



**************************************************



(continued from part 1/3)



Of course, we couldn't give him much of an implant, but we 

could give him a clue that he might have been implanted

at this point. You know, let a couple of the pictures leak 

out, looks like they're implant pictures.  That'd sort of 

keep him tacking that point of the line, wouldn't it?



And by giving him ennugh false track, and maybe giving him 

four or five or six false tracks, he would rapidly get of 

the opinion that the one thing he shouldn't do is to 

return on the time track.  Because if he does it is far 

too painful and confusing.



And you'd have him saying at last, in self-defense, "I've 

only lived but once."  Yes, that is one of the tricks that 

has been pulled.  Now, you say, "a false past".   That's 

good terminolqgy, by the way.  Find some auditors may trip, 

it around on their tongue, but you can learn how to say it. 

"A false past" is better than "phony pictures," or something 

like that.  In discussing this with a pc, you say "a false 

past."  Well, he understands this.



And R3R is good enough to be able to find a moment when a 

false past was installed, date it and get its duration. 

Really takes some doing.  Now, having dated it and gotten 

its duration, to actually run it out.  Now the incident 

pretends, let us say, to be many trillions of years long. 

And the actual duration of it is seldom more than three

or four hours.  So you get the appearance of enormous 

durations, and you get the appearance of tiny durations. 

You know, two or three hour duration, or eighty billion 

trillion squillion, to the nth tex boonk, see, years. 



You'll get two durations on the thing, some vast duration 

and some little duration.  And the incident can be run out. 

But don't get mad at the pc if he keeps stepping in the mud, 

you know, and finding himself going to the beginning of the 

incident, and wondering whether or not he's saw it.



Now, these incidents have as a common denominator, these 

incidents have as a common denominator, and the very few 

of them I have, the few I have seen, I expect there are 

other kinds.  I have seen some of them and they are confused 

to this degree: The point where you approached and the 

moment when you approached is quite commonly repeated in 

the incident.  So you walked up a set of steps to get 

there, so you now have a visio that looks like you're

wlaking up a set of steps IN the incident.  Same set 

of steps.  So you've got two walkings up the steps. 

One is in the incident, one is the actual one.



And there'll be two departures.  There's the actual 

departure, in which one was usually anaten and didn't 

know whether he was going or coming, and the picture 

of his departure.  And thetan-wise, of course it'd be a 

picture of exteriorizing from the area; it's getting dim 

in the distance.



In other words, there are two beginnings and two endings 

on such an incident.  Now, they also occasionally have a 

mechanism that shows troops marching away and troops 

marching to you.  This is how they communicate the 

beginning and end of things.  The beginning of things, 

of course, troops marching to you.  The end of things, 

troops marching away from you.  And these incidents 

usually start with the troops marching away from you 

and end with the troops marching to you. This was the 

common action.  I mean, that set of pictures was therapy, 

at one time, and is used consistently in therapy, so 

they copied this therapy device in this other action. 

Only in therapy they show you the beginning of something 

by, I think, the troops marching to you, and in the end, 

they show you the end of thing, about the troops marching 

away from you.



Sometimes they're sailors.  Sometimes they're sailors in 

pompon hats.  Sometimes they're people who look like West 

Point cadets.  But, you'll see these two marchings connected 

with it sometimes in these incidents.



So knowing these things you actually can find beginnings 

and ends of it.  But it's very confusing, of course, because 

the couple of hours there that aren't taken up give you a 

whole time track.  They give you some catastrophic accident 

that happened to you, you see, and then you remained dormant 

for a long time, and things were very mean, and so forth.



Well, the way you can tell false track is it really doesn't 

move.  You've got motion to such a limited degree that it 

doesn't make very much sense. Let me show you what I mean.



As you walk in this - that door back there, you see the 

front of this room, don't you?  When you turn around you 

see some more of the room, don't you? And when you sit 

down, you see some more of the room in front of you, 

but from a different viewpoint and level, right?  And 

then when you look down, you have a scanned area of 

passing your eyes down, toward a book or a meter or 

something like that, you see?  And you have the continuous 

sound channel that goes all the way along that accompanies 

this, any sound in the room is continuous.  Well, that 

is a proper sequence, very proper sequence.



Well, false track never looks like that.  They've not got 

the time for it, don't you see?  They're crowding all

this thing.  So you get a picture, if the picture is in 

motion, and they can be, you get a picture of the front 

door, then you get a picture of the front of the room, 

then you get a picture of the book in front of you, see? 

And they seldom add the sound that goes with it.  Many a 

pc who doesn't think he has any sonic is simply running 

false-track incidents where there is none.  Diabolical, 

isn't it?  Makes you go wog just to think about it.



Now, coupled with this is the fact that there is actual 

track.  You have actual track.  And this track, of course, 

is more sequitur, but again can be in segmental pictures 

if there's points of anaten.  You'll get the pictures 

right up to the point where you knocked yourself out, see? 

And then you'll pick up pictures after this point.  You 

don't have a complete series of pictures, but they don't 

go chop, chop, chop.  Let me give you a, let me give you 

an actual one.



Thetan is lying on the ground.  Airplane comes overhead. 

Thetan sees airplane come overhead.  It just sort of 

moves into view.  Airplane falls apart.  We stand up 

and take a look.  But that's simply a picture of the parts 

of the airplane falling, you see?  And then airplane 

parts are all over the ground, only they're plastic 

parts.  It's not a wrecked airplane, see?  We just 

get jump-jump-jump-jump.  See?  It's something like 

the movie director would cut when he was making a 

documentary.  You know, typical modern documentary. 

Children starving in Armenia.  Children starving in 

Egypt.  Children starving in Washington.  Children 

starving.  See?  You know, cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut. 

This is typical of one of these false incidents.



Now, why does the thetan look at the false incident? 

Why is he more likely to be on false incident than he is 

on true incident?  Well, false incident is safe.  There's 

no bite to the stuff.  There's a hell of a bang.  Now, 

don't think it isn't aberrative to get one of these bangs, 

at the beginnings and ends and the somatics that went 

with it.  But once you've got those somatics under control, 

it's much easier to look at false track than it is - just 

like you'd rather - a lot of people would rather look 

at a movie of life than live, see?  See, it's safe, 

because one really never lived it.



They're usually a derogatory or unhappy state of affairs 

of some kind or another.  And they're often quite - they're 

not well plotted.  There isn't anything very good about 

it.  It's messy.  But in running the incident out, of 

course the false track is part of the incident you're 

running out, right?  So the pc in running these two and a 

half hours gets the sensation of running several million 

trillion years of track, very often, except it doesn't 

take that long to do it.



Only he would gasp, if he thought he was having to scan 

through many trillions of years of track.  This would 

just fill him with "Uhhhhh Oh, no!" you see?  The time 

factor is too great.  When he really thinks of the number 

of pictures there could be on just one trillion years

of track, you see?  He'll say, "Well, am I going to be 

here the rest of the night?"  You know?  This is the 

idea he gets in session.  Well, the longest it could 

take if it were one for one would be a couple of hours.

 

Anyway, the somatics being wrong, and the scenery being 

wrong, and the character of the scenery being wrong, the 

whole thing is therefore a lie.  This is a lie about 

time.  It tells him where he has been, when.  When he 

wasn't there.  It puts trillions of years into two hours. 

There couldn't be a fancier lie about time.



Now they very often have wheels running over to the side 

with numbers on them.  So you can get all the dates you 

want on the side of the picture.  Sound familiar?  But a 

thetan also can do this. He also can visualize numbers to 

give himself "years ago" and that sort of thing.



Now, the one thing you can be absolutely sure of - one 

thing you can be absolutely sure of, with false - with -

on a question of false track and dates on false track, 

and that sort of thing, is that there are no GPMs that I 

know of.  There might be signs of them implanted on the 

false track, but no actual, runnable GPM could possibly 

be on a false-track implant basis.  That would just be 

totally pointless.



In the first place, you can't, on a false-track gag, get a 

guy to go over the top of the Ferris wheel several times 

with the full kinesthesia and motion, don't you see, and 

have him struck from both sides with all kinds of firings 

and that sort of thing.  So you know, you know that if you're 

running a GPM, that you're not on false track. Otherwise, 

beware.



Now, it would be adventurous to say that you know you are 

not on false track if vou are runninp this lifetime. I'm 

afraid that'd be an adventurous statement, however, because

I've seen some false track with brownstone houses on it 

that I could never account for in this lifetime.



Now, many a pc, many a pc starts to recover his sanity 

by just getting him to run, entering the room.  See, he 

can verify that that is the picture.  He walks in the 

room and sits down in the chair, and then you have him 

close his eyes, and he walk - he runs the incident of

walking in the room and going and sitting down in the 

chair.  Now he knows that's his picture, and he knows 

that is present time, and he knows it isn't an implant; 

makes him feel pretty comfortable.  Kind of a weird, a 

weird operation.  But don't discount it as its value in 

this sort of thing.  Because of course, a total swamp of 

a memory is the target of this, and a desire not to go 

back into the past, these are the immediate fruits of it.



Now, let's look at actual track.  What about actual track? 

Can you also find actual track?  Oh yeah, that's pretty 

easy to find.  It's pretty easy to find.  GPMs are very 

easy to find.  The dates of GPMs, this sort of thing.  

That's all perfectly accurate, don't you see?  But you're 

always walking there with the possibility that you've 

got some false track may turn up on this pc.  So there's 

two things you want to know when you're - when you find 

an incident and date it.  Two things you really want to 

know is one, does it contain opposite firing items? 

Like - that is to say, is it a GPM?  And the other thing 

you want to know about it, does it contain false track?



Not, does it contain any pictures?  This very often will 

not register.  When I say, "false track" I'm using a term 

that we would use but not necessarily on a pc.  Better 

to say, "false past"  Does it contain any flse past?

Because all these picture implants have the ambition of 

teaching somebody a false past.



Now, you need all this data.  You need all this data, as 

discouraging and as upsetting and as miserable and as 

disheartening as it is.  And I know you will go home

tonight and lie down and say, "God, that's terrible.

Oooh!  Aaaah!  Are my pictures real?  Am I really real?" 

Remember the old lady that the robbers caught, and cut her 

clothes up, and when she finally got home her dog barked 

at her, and nobody knew her, and she finally decided 

when she sat down, "Can this really be me?" you know? 

She herself didn't know her after a while. 



Well, there's no particular reason to get in that state, 

and it's perfectly all right if you do, because it's 

simply a restimulated state.  And the cure of the state 

is, when dating, just make sure that you don't have any 

GPMs in it, or if you do, maybe you're looking for GPMs.



That's - none of the - neither of these things debar you 

from running the engram. But let's just make sure we know 

what we're running.  You scan somebody through a GPM, and 

you're going to go blang-bang-bang, and he's going to stir 

it all up, but he can't see the pictures, and you don't know 

what's going on.  It's much easier to just - not move him 

to the beginning of the incident but move him to the first 

pair of items.  And you don't move anybody anyhow. You 

just say, "Give me the first pair of items in that GPM," 

see, after you've - if you want to establish what it is, 

you haven't got a pattern, it's off-date, and that sort 

of thing, just what are the first pair of items?  He'll 

give you something.  Work it out.  Muddle through.



When you've got it all straight, why you can scan him 

through the whole incident.  It's perfectly all right 

if you do that, also.  But on false track, what it tells 

you is be very very alert to getting a wrong date for 

the incident, and a wrong duration.  Because any incident 

which contains false track is of very short duration.



How long does it take to give somebody a feature length

picture in 3-D with complete somatics hitting him in 

the breadbasket, of several trillion years?  If you 

only give him a few pictures of each?  See?  Doesn't 

take very long.  Well, that's the criteria.



Now the Darwinian theory - now, I'll give you some idea 

of the influence of false track upon this society.  The 

Darwinian theory, which probably influenced Pavlov to 

the greatest degree, is just an implant.  That is an 

implant from man to mud.  And it starts out oddly enough 

with the goal, "to persist."



Starts with the goal "to persist," which I consider very, 

very interesting, because there's not another item in it. 

There isn't even, "not persist."  There, you see, they 

didn't have the word, you know?  They didn't have a 

doublefiring item.



And then they show you your arrival, which you... See, 

actually they have you in a cell for a while, so they 

show you being in the cell, and then show you arriving 

in the room to be implanted.  Got that?  So you've 

actually - if you were conscious when you went in the 

room, it - you've got now two arrivals in the same room, 

see?  And then they show you - complete with pictures, 

not unlike a modern motion-picture screen, they show 

you all that has happened to you, very briefly; they 

give you background on how mean you are, and then they 

show you getting implanted.



And actually the implantation takes place - the picture 

never touches the pc, I mean, never touches the person 

being implanted, but simply stacks mass around his body. 

All the time he's looking at the picture he's having hell 

knocked out of him many feet away from the picture by 

electronic mass stacking around his body.  See, he's 

being hit with waves around his body, you see?  So he -

this mass gets associated with the - you know, it holds 

it in the picture, and so forth.  And there isn't another 

thing said. There's not one word said.



And one of the things you've got to be careful of in 

running false past is getting the pc all mixed up with 

giving you a fantastic number of items, or something 

like this.  You understand?  But in this particular 

Darwinian one, nothing is said.  You occasionally do 

get something said in one of these things; you do 

sometimes get sonic in these false past lives, or you 

get conversation or you get this, or you get that.



But beware, beware of running things in incidents 

which aren't there.  It's almost more deadly than 

missing things which are there.  Don't overrun 

these incidents.  You know, you can take a GPM and 

you could just pull conversation out of it by the 

hour.  Did you know that?  And every item is wrong.



Did you realize that?  The guy is sitting there in 

the middle of the GPM and you don't know what the goal 

is, and you don't even know that it's this type of GPM -

you might have landed by accident in the middle of the 

Helatrobus Implants, or somethinp_of the sort. 

Maybe the goal is "to leave." And he just gives you

item after item of goodbye, farewell, adios, you know?

And you know, he just gives you item after item of 

goodbyes and farewells--it's just the goal "to leave."



It's just "leave," "nix leave," "absolutably," see, "left," 

"not left" or "nix left," "absolutably." You know?  He's 

giving you wrong items.  And you'll pay the penalty for 

getting wrong items sooner or later - the whole incident 

tends to fold up.  If you want to see an incident get 

crunchy, get a wrong date, a wrong duration, or run 

things out of it that aren't in it.  So this is a point 

that you have to watch.



Now, this incident - this incident, now with a wheel 

dating device which gives you a series of numbers that 

gives you - gives you the time of these events, shows 

you being implanted, shows you finished implanting, 

shows you leaving - being pushed out of the implant 

room, even shows you a couple of your fellow crew members, 

or something like that, there, who are tied up ready 

to be put into the room, shows you being put aboard a 

spaceship, shows you being taken to another planet, 

shows you being dumped in the sea, and shows you start 

from the sea and become seaweed and become this - and 

to work up stage by stage - giving the millions of 

years which elapse on each step, see?  And you go on 

and on up the line, each step, each step, each step 

on an evolutionary channel, and you run all the way 

through on these evolutionary channels.  A lot of 

this stuff starts looking awfully 3-D after you've 

been looking at them for a while, and shows you eventually 

arriving at the state of being a man.  See?  Gives 

you a bit more louse-up in the way of pictures ending,

pictures beginning, something of this sort.



And then they push you out through that exact corridor, 

past the exact two dummies that are tied up, to the 

exact spaceship, put you in the exact capsule, drop 

you into that exact sea, and expect you to make some 

seaweed and go on up the beach.  We were fooled only 

to the degree of some of the incidents of What to Audit 

<History of Man> are actually out of that.  Some of 

the incidents of What to Audit are actual, some are 

out of that Darwinian implant, see?



Now, that's very interesting, to recognize how they 

can make you live your life twice.  Because that one

pretends to go into the future, not into the past. 

Gorgeous louse-up, see?  I know, I caught this with 

myself, but after they dumped me down at the bottom of

the sea, I said "Ho-hum, skip it", and went over and 

picked up a young fisherman's baby, and so forth, and 

hung around there for a while, catching my Breath. 

Didn't bother to go through all this, seemed pointless.



But, the idea - that's very finite.  That's a very short 

time ago.  That's only a couple of hundred million years 

ago.  A lot of characters around here got this, most of 

them become scientists.  That actually is the sole 

foundation of the Darwinian theory.  That's the lot. 

Evolution: there's no such thing.



Bodies don't evolve.  They deteriorate, but they don't

evolve.  You can trace all kinds of reasons how they 

evolve, and why they evolve, and you can figure it all 

out, but the truth of the matter is when you get horses 

on a planet, somebody came along and mocked up some horses!

Now they also mocked up these horses with the capability 

of growing hair or not growing hair.  You've got 

adjustment factors, but not evolution factors.  So 

you confuse the adjustment factors and prove the whole 

theory of evolution.  And now you know man came from mud, 

and you can write a book like Pavlov and get the whole 

world poisoned.  You see how this one goes?



All of this is based on what?  It's based on errors in

time.  Errors in time.  Because an individual has this 

incident: It's a wrong time, wrong place, going wrong

wrong the whole way, and it took up two hours and actually

looks like it takes up seven million, see?  There are 

such incidents.



Just before the Helatrobus Implants they were practicing 

these.  Just before the Helatrobus Implants, you're liable 

to pick one up on a pc, within the few hundred billion

years earlier than the Helatrobus Implants, or perhaps 

even after the Helatrobus Implants, you're liable to pick 

up one of these false-track incidents.  So they last -

they're liabIe to be found almost any place.



Now, if you know that these things exist you can whip it. 

See, it's all in what you - what you know exists. 



When you first collide with one, you're going to be "Gee-whiz!" 

you know, and you're going to be much more nervous than you 

need to be.  If you know there is such a thing as a false-past 

incident and you check up for these things, at the risk of 

invalidating the pc's actual track, you get yourself sailing 

along there, and you got this incident, and it's at 

forty-four trillion years ago, perfectly valid date, you see?



The reason I'm talking to you so strenuously about this is 

you're just about to be correcting somebody's dates. As a 

matter of fact you were at it today.  You start correcting 

the dates of incidents and you're going to run into this 

other Phenomenon.  It's going to drive you mad, man, if

you don't know it exists.  You can't correct dates on a 

case unless you know this other phenomena exists, because 

it's full of false dates, see?



Pc and you could work at it, correcting false dates - I 

don't know, another couple of hundred hours, all out of 

one two-and-a-half-hour incidents.  The thing to do is to,

when you start correcting dates of incidents the first

thing you should look for is an incident that contains

a false past.  Not an incident contains flse dates.

Don't worry about false dates so much.  You just want

false past.



But, remember that it can also contain a false future. 

So that mustn't be totally dismissed as a possibility. 

Fortunetellers practice that to this day; it's very 

popular, false futures.  They get you sitting over the

crystal ball, you know, and they say, "I see a dark 

man coming into your life. And he'll be six feet tall if 

you give me two bucks, and he'll only be five foot eight, 

if you don't give me..." They're tailor making future. 

And most fortunes depend on the fact that pcs have future 

implants that they dramatize, and tend to dramatize.  

They want to always know about the future.  They're 

really not nervous, they're just dramatizing an implant.



You must ask for false past.  That'll give you the most 

loused-up, because future doesn't, too often, contain 

dates.  But also check for false futures - an incident 

about false futures.  And between the two of these things, 

why, you're all set.  False present, well, everybody 

knows it's false anyway.



The task is not a very difficult one, providing you know 

this information.  As far as GPMs are concerned, you go 

back on the track on GPMs, and you got GPMs at eighteen 

trillion, trillion years ago, and ha-ha, they start banging 

you in the head and firing left and right, and you're going 

over the rolly coaster, and you're doing this and you're 

doing that.  Yes, there's always the possibility there could 

be an implant that also refers to this GPM, but that cannot 

be done.



What type of equipment is used now, in order to implant 

false dates, and so on?  It's usually quite - it's quite 

varied, but it really never moves off the basis of something 

you look into or something you look at, attended by electronic 

blasts.  And that's the common denominator of all such equipment.



(continued in part 3/3)



**************************************************