From nobody@REPLAY.COM Sat May 16 17:56:41 1998

Path: spln!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news

Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 02:56:41 +0200 (MET DST)

Message-ID: <199805170056.CAA07482@basement.replay.com>

Subject: FZ BIBLE 1/3 ERRORS IN TIME

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)

Organization: Replay Associates, L.L.P.

X-001: Replay may or may not approve of the content of this posting

X-002: Report misuse of this automated service to <abuse@replay.com>

X-URL: http://www.replay.com/remailer/

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Lines: 543

Xref: spln alt.religion.scientology:300900 alt.clearing.technology:38543



FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



TRANSCRIPT OF THE ERRORS IN TIME TAPE 1/3





Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet

are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any

Jewish opinion.



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************





ERRORS IN TIME   (part 1 of 3)



St. Hill Special Briefing Course Tape lecture of 18 July 63



6307C18 SHSBC-287 renumbered SHSBC-316





Well, glad to see you all here, dry. Summer - summer's gone 

now, you know?  I find out when summer is gone by watching 

the banyan tree.  It's on the other side of the house there.  

And when its leaves start to turn brown, why, we know autumn 

is amongst us.  So break out your boots and dogsleds. 

(laughter).



This is what?



Audience: Eighteen July.



Eighteen July AD 13, Saint Hill Special Briefing Course, and 

another lecture on dating.



Now, I've already told you--I've already told you that dating 

is a very high-caliber activity, very important in auditing, and 

that the tone arm sticks only because of wrong dates.  Got That?

That's realy the reason tone arms stick.  Frankly, it's the only 

reason tone arms stick.



And you might have asked yourself, some time or another, "If 

you do have this much track, why does everybody around believe 

so implicitly that they have lived only once?" See, it might 

seem rather odd to you that the insistance on this fact that

people have lived only once, the near-psychotic frenzy with 

which people go into, insisting they have lived only once. 

It must really take something to shut off somebody's memory 

to that degree. It really must take something.  Actually a

GPM doesn't account for it.  The goal "To Be dead" in the 

GPMs is not enough.  Because that doesn't say you've lived 

only once, that just tells you to be dead.



So you might ask yourself, why is it that man is so wrong-dated? 

Now, when I was able to run down the common denominator of people 

who can't run on the time track, I found out that the common 

denominator was not whether or not they got sonic and visio, 

but whether or not they got tone arm motion.  Very good, we've 

just covered that in a lecture.  And the reason they don't 

get tone arm motion is wrong time - wrong dates.  



All right, so much for that.



Behind all aberration there must be a lie.  And you can 

mark that down in letters of fire. Aberration cannot exist in 

the presence of truth. Aberration can only exist in the presence

of a lie.  If somebody is hung with lombosis, you can be very 

sure that there is a lie connected with the lumbosis. 

Elementary, my dear Watson.  That is one of the common 

denominators of Scientology.  That is one of the truisms, 

one of the maxims, something that weaves through everything. 



There are others of similar nature. For instance, don't talk 

to a pc or a person, or talk around a person, who is unconscious. 

You know, and it's that sort of thing. And want to know 

something about aberration, that's a better contribution than 

anything "Wuff Wuff" Pavlov ever dreamed up.  Didn't you know 

that was his name? Later part of his life you know.  His papers, 

as far as I'm concerned, go "Bark-bark-bark-bark comma, 

bark-bark-bark comma, bark-bark-bark semicolon."



Reg <Reg Sharp> was kind enough to dig me up some Pavlov.

I wanted some Pavlov.  I was studying how not to write up 

technical data.  I didn't know that was why I wanted Pavlov, 

I just knew it must be important to do some study on this, 

and that's what I found.  I didn't find that dogs were very 

informative, I know more about dogs than he does.  But -

I mean just as dogs.  Dogs are friends of mine, and he didn't 

like them.  But, "Wuff Wuff" Pavlov gives us a marvelous 

example of how not to write up technical information. It's 

heroic, man.  Try it sometime. He wanders all over the 

pastures and the fields and dales, and so forth, and he 

finally gets down to his something-or-other.



It's much more important to him that he used "surgery 

comparable to that applied to human beings" when operating 

on dogs.  And he goes on at great length about the surgery 

precautions taken on his dogs.  And he was taking perfectly 

healthy, happy dogs, and cutting out half their bladder or 

half their esophagus or half of something.  He never could 

go all the way, you know?  He - And he admitted that this 

more or less damaged his laboratory animals, and therefore 

he had to take surgical precautions. And it isn't a textbook

on surgery.



He's giving, of course, the conditions of his experiment.

But he never gets around to the experiment.



But anyway, "Wuff_ Wuff" Pavlov is a marvelous example of

a lot of things.  He is a man who is totally dedicated to 

the dramatization of one engram: the-Darwinian theory - Man 

from Mud.  He's a physiologist turned psychologist.  And he's 

in wild protest against the psychologists. Because remember,

the psychologists of his day believed in the soul.  Some of

them were still around who did.  After all, psychologist means

Psyche - Ologist.  



And he's the great physiologist.  And you want to look at 

how you get aberrated because your neurons have turned into morons.



I was there trying to ask a question.  I'm not wandering afield 

from what I'm talking about here, I was trying to ask, I was

trying to ask a question.



Why is it that the Russians know nothing about some of the

basic laws of social behavior?  Why is it that they overlook 

these laws?  And I thought, they have Pavlov, and Pavlov 

stresses the salivation of the dog, not his salvation, his 

salivation, that's all he was interested in, the salivation 

of the dog when stimulated by beefsteak, and the whining of

the dog when beaten with clubs.  So they would, he would mix

these two stimulus response mechanisms up, and so on.



And I wanted to know if Pavlov had ever drawn the conclusion - I 

haven't found this out yet, I can't wade through the stuff - but 

if he'd ever drawn the conclusion that a reward was also part 

of existence.  That was what I was trying to draw.  Do the 

Russians know this?  Is this part of the Russian mental 

technology?  And apparently it is not.  And apparently 

that fact reads through Pavlov without being punched up, 

as near as I can tell.  He doesn't say "existence consists 

of reward and punishment".   See?  That is not the thesis.



Now, thee and me, knowing more about this, would immediately 

conceive that if somebody had a dog salivating or whining 

under punishment or reward that he would conclude that there 

were two stimuli, and one was reward and one was punishment. 

But this is far too simple, and Pavlov never made these 

comparisons, apparently, as far as I can tell, wading 

through the stuff.  Isn't that interesting?



I consider that extremely fascinating, because the whole 

Russian system is caving in because they haven't got this 

little factor of reward.  That is what Is wrong with the

Russian communist system.  Frankly, thee and me could probably 

sit down and figure out a communist system that would be a 

geewhizzer, that would probably work. The - probably the 

fault is not with communism, the fault is the lie which 

lies behind communism, which is the physiological nature of man.



Now, with that lie back of communism, communism becomes a 

scourge.  See, it becomes an aberration.  There are probably

many things about communism that aren't aberrative.  You could 

probably do lots of things with the idea of the communal activity

of man.  You could probably do a lot of things with collectivism. 

We do things with collectivism.  We try to make it work. The 

Russians are not interested in making it work because they've

misunderstood the nature of man.  And this is not a lecture 

on Russia, I'm just showing you the lie back of aberration.



So communism becomes fought, and communism becomes very

disastrous when practiced.  And the poor sods that are walking 

around with communism wonder where their next muzhik is 

coming from.  They don't know.  And that's because when

Pavlov did his work, he never said that life consisted of 

reward and punishment. 



He does a total anatomy of punishment.  And here's this 

drifting factor, reward, which is apparently on automatic.

The reason capitalism works is because nobody has analyzed

it, and people want pay and they give them pay.



I almost started a riot amongst Bantus by telling them 

that if communism came to South Africa - this was real 

mean of me - why, they wouldn't, they wouldn't get paid, 

that communisms didn't pay you for your work.  And they 

thought this was terrible.  And they were spitting on 

the street and stamping and damning Khrushchev, see?



I mean it was very upsetting to them.  Because the one

thing - the very, very commercial little culture the 

Bantu has ...  And boy you talk about the importance

of debts!  Some guy owes some money, why that debt will 

be passed down, and next generation, and next generation 

somebody's great great great great grandchildren are still

worried abou those two cows, you see, that Uncle Zidd,

or something, is owed.  They just - the idea of commerce 

and money and that sort of thing is very deeply ingrained 

in these people.



And to tell them that communism was a system of getting 

them to work so they didn't have to be - so they wouldn't 

be paid, that just about finished it.



Now, if capitalism was earnest about fighting communism, 

and so forth, it would dig up a few salient truths and 

let them have it, see?  Because that is the lie back of 

communism.  The lie back of communism is man is a 

physiological animal going forward on the basis of a 

punishment stimulus-response.  And of course, man does 

not, DOES NOT, respond to punishment stimulus response. 

Very un-uniform response.



You've had the experience yourself. You take somebody and 

you say, "If you don't so-and-so and so-and-so, I'm

going to rhrr-rhrr-rhrr-rhrrr".



And A, that you told this to, cringed and said, "Oh 

yes!  All right, all right.  Don't beat me."  And B, 

C and D said, "Why you SOB.  Knock your block off, 

see?"  You'd knok their heads in, and they'd get back up,

and they still wouldn't do it.  And you knock their

heads in, and they'd get back up, and they still wouldn't

do it.  And it's not a constant, don't you see?



In other words, not all living beings succumb to the 

stimulus of promised punishment. The whole Roman Empire 

caved in because a sect, called the Christians, moved in, 

who didn't stimuli or who didn't "respo" when they got

the stimuli of punishment.  The court said, "We're going

to burn you at the stake." And they saic "Burn away! We 

will become martyrs."  And the Roman Empire couldn't handle 

them! That was it!  That was it, see, they'd met their

match.  Very important.  Extremely important.



Now, stimulus-response, then, is half of the picture, 

don't you see?  Man does not go as a total stimulus

response mechanism.  Down in various homely locales 

I've heard "Ya kin ketch more flies with honey then 

ya kin with vinegar!"  You've heard that sort of thing. 

Well, they're talking about the reward part of existence, 

see? That's very important, the reward part of existence.



Now, the Christian had a greater reward promised him than 

the punishment.  In the first place, he HAD to die in order

to go to heaven.  And he simply considered this very

accomodating on the part of the Roman empire and its

courts.  It got him there that much quicker.  And so

the Roman empire could do nothing with the Christian,

the Christian overthrew the Roman Empire and it

became the Holy Roman Empire.  Literally, factually,

yes, you see?



Well, there was a lie. There was a lie involved, then, 

in the Roman Empire.  So it didn't survive.  And what 

was that lie?  Well, they must have been subscribing 

to the same thing Pavlov was writing about; that man 

is a stimulus-response creature who responds to punishment 

and threat of punishment; and that to get something done, 

you threaten or you punish; and if you threaten and punish 

enough, you will get things done.



Well, I will give it to the Roman Empire, they got quite

a ways.  They got further than anybody else.  But there was a 

lie involved there, in that there wasn't a whole statement 

of the proposition.  There was also reward.  And the funny 

part of it is that men will do more things for reward than 

they will for punishment.  So they had just cut out three

quarters of the pie, and then said that the remaining quarter 

of the pie was the totality of the pie, and tried to carry an 

empire along on that basis, and of course, it folded.  And

what do you know!  After all these years, you think things 

change actually, in this very finite period of time since

the Roman Empire, and the equally religious fervor of

the communist Russian Empire, you get the same fault

cropping up.



So you have the philosophy which they adopt is the one which 

assures them that punishment is all.  They adopt this 

philosophy, and they have immediately adopted something 

which gives them a commercial upset, economic upset.  And 

although they're very clever people and have a great deal 

on the ball on the subject of economics, they say economics 

are nine-tenths of life; life is only one-tenth political. 

They've got a lot of things like this.  They have a terrific 

propaganda machine.  They have practically every newspaper

editor in the world working for them.  Khrushchev has more

press agents than any other single ruler in the world.  



And yet, in spite of all this, on one of their collective 

farms, they go around and take a look at the tractor, and 

its wheels have fallen off.  And they want to know where's

the tractor driver, and they don't know where he is.

"Well he's down in the woods".  "Well, where's the woods?

What's ... Who else is in the woods?" this manager will

be saying.  And "Well, he's down there, and they're picking 

berries." "Oh, they're picking berries. Well, all right." 

And he goes down and he says to the guys down in the woods, 

"What are you doing picking berries?" And all the old women 

and everybody down there says, "Well, we've got to do something

to make a living!"  And they found out that they can pick 

berries, and put them in boxes and sell them in the local 

town, and they can make a couple of quick rubles.  See? 

To hell with the collective farm. See?



Half-a-ruble reward for sweating it out in the woods picking 

berries is much better than a no-ruble reward because they're 

going to get their heads blown off if they don't drive the

tractors and plow the fields, see?  You get the idea?



So they're running into this all the time. This causes them 

then to go into a terrific campaign of some kind or another,

you know.  They go into this terrific campaign, "What you want 

to be is the "new man", "the total communist", the this, the 

that, the...  Those guys are just sweating themselves to 

pieces all the time.  And they're trying to compensate for

this lie.



They think capitalism produces, in some peculiar and mysterious 

way, more goods than a communism.  And they don't know why

this is.  They've never analyzed why this is because Pavlov

didn't tell them.  Capitalism has many, many things wrong 

with it.  But it hasn't clipped off totally, not until they 

invented internal revenue, anyway, the totality of award. 

So you can still, you can still, if you're very, very clever 

and so on, you can still keep some of your pay, if you're

careful.  But it's still a reward system.



Now as that reward system dwindles, so dwindles the actual

health of the society.  And the more internal revenue and the 

less reward, and the more threat of punishment, and the more 

you can go to jail if you don't turn over all your pounds, 

shillings, dollars, francs or something, to the local income

tax people, you see, the more that works, why, the more 

difficulty their society gets into.  See, you're not spending 

any time to work out how to, how do you go about making a 

healthy economic society?  They never spend any time on that. 

They're just chipping away at this award and punishment.

So actually they're starting to borrow Pavlov too.



So, here is a lie.  Here is a lie.  The statement that man 

acts totally because of punishment and only because of 

punishment; that man is a driven animal.  That lie, all 

by itself, is destroying the social structure of man. 

Because man doesn't go like that!  You see?  But we enter

this lie upon the stage, and here we go. All you've got to 

do is have a great big lie floating around someplace and 

you have trouble.



Now, it is perfectly all right to have difficulty isolating 

the truth, as long as you are continuing to try to isolate 

the truth.  That's the difference.  You sit down hard on one 

lie, and say that now is the truth, and you've done the trick, 

you see?  You say, "Pavlov has written all there is to know 

about the human mind", and at that moment you've had it.

Because he hasn't.  He hasn't even written about the human 

mind.  And the reason I mentioned his prose is because it's 

obvious why nobody has ever read him, you can't.



So a sort of a tradition has grown up as to what Pavlov's 

work is all about. See? And we have not even the work of 

Pavlov motivating this kind of thing.  We've got a superstition 

about what the work of Pavlov is about.  It's never been 

properly presented, you see?



We've got a lot of lies around, and so forth, but we're not 

betting on those lies to carry us through, see?  That's 

perfectly all right.  You can have a whole bunch of misconceptions 

and still not do your nut.  But the second you settle 

completely on a lie, and say now that that is the truth, from 

that moment on you've had it.  And you've had it to the 

degree that that truth can be pervasive in your life.  You 

can say, "Joe is a good man" when you know - when really 

the truth is he's a bad man, and this may cause you some 

inconvenience, but it won't destroy your sanity.  It'll 

cause you some worry.  But you say, "I have lived but once",

and then believe it, defend it and contest it, and of course, 

you're going to have trouble from there on out.  It takes a 

lie of this magnitude to continue the aberration of man. 

It takes a magnitudinous one.



Now, to maintain such a lie must at the same time take a 

fantastic amount of duress.  I mean you'd have to work at

it to maintain that lie.  And whenever you find a maintained 

lie, you'll find somebody is working at it. This guy has got 

a headache... Well, I don't know that you could do an

all-therapy on this basis.  This guy has got a headache.

You find the lie connected with the headache, and you could

probably resolve the headache.  That very well might be an 

open sesame to all psychosomatic healing. You know, you 

could probably work a whole parade of stuff out: "Let's 

find the lie connected with..." See? "Recall a lie about 

a headache," see? Something like that.  And bang, the guy's

headache is gone.  You see, you're working now with

one of these first principles, when you're working with a 

lie.  You got that?



Now let's carry this just a little bit further... I didn't 

mean to get off into_communism.  I thought you might be 

amused.  Now carrying this off a little further, let's

find a lie about WHAT.  See, now that we've found out a 

lie is this pervasive, see, now, what would be the most 

disastrous type of lie?  And the most disastrous type of lie 

as a common denominator, although there are many disastrous 

types of lies, would be about time.



So let's combine these two things, you see? You see what a 

lie can do, all by itself, that has nothing to do with time. 

All right, now let's combine it with something which has the 

power to freeze a tone arm on a pc, that no matter...

a big mid ruds on what bad things you've done to him in the 

session, no matter what horrible this-a's'and that-a's

and what processes you were to run - without paying any 

attention to lies or time, you see - no matter what you 

do to correct this tone arm, if you do not pay attention 

to wrong time it will not correct.  You got that?  See? 

This is the only one capable of putting a total freeze 

on a tone arm.



Well a total freeze on a tone arm is a total freeze on a 

case. So this gets fantastic.  This gets very, very, very, 

very dreary indeed. So we must be looking here at something 

like a pervasive common denominator of abberation when we 

say "a lie about time".



This immediately brings to view processes by the ton.  You 

start thinking up processes, you can just string them out 

by the hour.  "Recall a lie about time", you see.  "Recall

a lie about time, Recall a lie about time" see?  This kind 

of a - this kind of a process would just string on and on 

and on and on and on, don't you see?



Now, it's interesting that if you - if you - oh, you can 

think of others. You can think of others.  Let's just date 

everything in somebody's life.  That's an ordinary one.  He 

believes he's lived but once, well, let's date everything 

in that life that has lived but once.  Soon as we got that 

thing kind of dated up you're liable to find out that he'll 

fall through.



Now, just think of, think of this approach, see?  You might 

even apply this on an institutional level to just get the

whenness of things, you know?  For instance when is this 

E-Meter?  Guy would have to think for a long time.  He'd

finally decide it was now, see?  Might be quite deaberrative; 

might straighten out his time track most interestingly. 

Of course, that's highly experimental, not advanced as 

something that is proven.  But I'm just giving you an idea 

that you can extrapolate this idea of lie about time almost 

anyplace you want to look, and you will have some interesting 

results on a processing line.



See, because that combines then the single action that is

the most aberrative action, which is an alter-isness of truth 

or a denial of truth, with the one thing which if aberrated 

brings about, then, the greatest mess-up from the viewpoint 

of a person.  We won't call it anything technical, but it 

just messes him up most.  Time messes him up the most.  And 

we get these two things in combination, of course, we get a 

lie about time, and we're off to the races.



Well, having recognized this situation, I looked it over 

very carefully. We have the GPMs, and we have things of this 

nature, and looked those over, and then I said to myself, 

I said, "Well now," I said, "Ronnie, if you've gotten this 

far, this sort of thing, let's just take a look at this now. 

You suppose some peculiarly and particularly brilliant 

blankety-blank somewhere on the track has also discovered 

this and used it to aberrate? Ah well, if that's the case, 

then there must be such a thing as false time track, complete 

with times.  Let's see if we can find some."  And I found some.



Give somebody a false past.  Implant him with a false past, 

complete with pictures, complete with times, and times in 

the order of magnitude of the thetan's actual existence -

trillions and trillions of years.  We could also give 

him some weird and incomprehensible dates. That'd be a 

little fillip on the thing, you know; that would be 

some way tn throw a new curve into it.  Give him

one thousand and sixty-nine times trillion to the tenth. 

Let him chew on that for a while.  And he never can find 

out what date that is.



And you would effectually have blocked out the past by making 

it so confusing to be entered, and so dreary and so terrible 

and so awful that nobody would want to have anything to do 

with it.  Now, nobody ever would spend any time enhancing 

the powers of the thetan, unless he was more diabolical 

than is believable.  But they'd certainly tend to make 

them derogatory.  They'd make the life as a thetan seem 

very, very dangerous, very unpleasant.  Because look!  Look 

at the horrible thing's that can happen to you.  And therefore,

if all these horrible things can happen to you, why, then 

of course, you don't want to have anything to do with it.



And you could get a guy fixed up with sufficient number of 

false pasts, that he'd even dramatize a false past. He'd 

become a fiction writer or something like that.  He'd even, 

he'd even automatically give you a false story of his past, 

don't you see?  He could get quite loopy on this subject, 

if he were driven in with enough explosion, enough bang, 

and so on. And if the incident itself were hung up with a 

double explosion, you know, left-right bang-bang, sort of a 

double RI <GPM Reliabile Item> of the thing, you see?  Plus 

and minus RI of the thing; hang it up on the track real good. 



And just give him a good, long time track.  Let's give him, let's 

give him a few trillion years to chew on, or a few trillion 

trillion years to chew on.  And let's give him some incident 

on that track. Let's give him a nice history that goes along 

with that track.  Let's give him pictures.  Let's even give him 

some times when he's been implanted.



(continued in part 2/3)



**************************************************