From nobody@REPLAY.COM Sat May 16 20:55:10 1998
Path: spln!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 05:55:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <199805170355.FAA00633@basement.replay.com>
Subject: FZ BIBLE 3/12 CLEARING CONGRESS
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Organization: Replay Associates, L.L.P.
X-001: Replay may or may not approve of the content of this posting
X-002: Report misuse of this automated service to <abuse@replay.com>
X-URL: http://www.replay.com/remailer/
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Lines: 434
Xref: spln alt.religion.scientology:300944 alt.clearing.technology:38563

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

TRANSCRIPT OF THE CLEARING CONGRESS 3/12


Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************

Transcript of LRH Video Taped Lecture ------ Number 2 of 6

The Clearing Congress Lectures

Shoreham Hotel,  Washington, D.C.                         July 4, l958



		      THE FACTORS OF CLEARING


You know, I've got some sort of idea that we have a Congress started here.  
What do you think?  Alright!  It's an awfully grand crowd.  I don't know 
how many people are here but I think it's one of the largest Congresses 
we've had.  Nobody's given me a report, everybody's in a flap (chuckle).  
One of the things that has made this Congress different than other 
Congresses is a long standing ambition of the organization, was to film 
one of these Congresses, and so that is happening during this.  Of course, 
that sort of thing always introduces randomity in such things.

Now here first off, we have the usual lot of telegrams here of one kind or 
another.  And here we have one from Frank Turnbull in New Zealand from the 
HASI staff in New Zealand, Australia, and Oceania.  "Wishing you the 
Clearest and best Congress yet. Stop.  We wish we were there in body as 
well as spirit".  Well, as a matter of fact, I'm sorry they're not here.  
I'm sorry they're not sitting right there.  But that means, I'll have to 
pick up this mock-up one of these days, you know, pick up this mock-up and 
take it down, and put it down in New Zealand.  Mock-ups are very hard to 
move around;  have you ever noticed that?  

And here's from the Scientologists up from the Pacific Northwest.  "Dear 
Ron, staff, and Congress members.  Congrats and have a wonderful Congress.  
All the best, Scientology Washington State".  And here is from the HASI 
staff and the Organization Secretary, John Fudge and HCO Secretary, Rona 
(garbled).  "Best wishes for a bumper Clearing Congress".   And here's one 
from the HASI, South Africa,  Maggie Skoltz down there. "Best wishes for a 
happy Congress".  We have sitting right down here, the Secretary of South 
Africa and his very charming lady - here is Jack Parkhouse and Allyson.  
Stand up.  You see, they did come partially in body (chuckle). And here's 
one from California, "Here's wishing you the best Congress ever". And also, 
we have the California office represented almost in totality, here in Julie 
and Ken.  Stand up.  

We have here a great many well-wishers from all parts of the world.  From 
Oregon, from ----, every place but that part, that part of the world which 
has gone into a little bit of darkness.  We have a part of the world that's 
gone slightly into darkness - The Russian-African, pardon me, the Russian-
Asian sector of the world, which would love to sweep into Africa and other 
places.  It's an interesting thing to me not to have any organizational 
offices in any of those countries.  I wonder if there's any parallel at all 
between the adoption of a totally materialistic viewpoint and an evident 
inability to be communicated with.  I wonder if that has any, any 
correlations whatsoever.

Well, let's get on with the Congress here - we've got one.  How about 
bringing in my notes.  You know I always have to have notes (laughing).  
(A large stack of books on a dolly is wheeled on to the stage).  There we 
are, good, good.  I always have to have notes, you know.  It's a very hard 
thing to follow notes.  I mean, to give an extemporaneous Congress and I 
don't want to establish some new principle here, being entirely 
extemporaneous, and so forth, and just giving you a Congress off the cuff, 
because it would be a bad precedent (Chuckle), you know. So I, this time I 
very carefully collected some notes and some materials and so on;  and in 
view of the fact that we're dealing mainly and basically with the mind, 
why I've collected here most of the noteworthy books on the subject of mind.

And I'm very happy to, to (picking up a book) --- here, for instance, "A 
General Introduction To Psychoanalysis", by professor Sigmund Freud, LLD - 
what's that LLD stand for?  Well, that's beside the point.  Anyway, we 
want to take this thing up thoroughly. We want to take the Mind up very 
thoroughly.  (Leafing through book and reading) "The courtyard in which the 
sheet-metal lies spread out is not to be considered primarily as symbolical 
but refers to the father's place of business. I will add arbitrarily that 
going down, like the more usual going up, is meant to describe......."  
Well, isn't that interesting!  (Turning pages in book and reading) "I mean 
love rivalry with the emphasis on the sexual character.  The son, even as 
a small child begins to develop a special tenderness for his mother".  
Wouldn't it be strange if a small child didn't develop a tenderness for his 
mother (laugh).  "But here we find the Oedipus complex entering in".  We 
now know why we're all aberrated, because we're fond of our mothers (chuckle).  
(Leafing through book) Well, I don't want to give you a Congress without a 
great deal of learned material in it and ....(reading)  "to be sure, there 
are all kinds of  objections possible to the declaration that neurotic 
symptoms are a substitute for sexual satisfaction".  You said it, there 
are objections, in fact, I can think of quite a few (laughing).  Well, I 
just wanted to give you a very authoritative...... I guess we better 
forget that one.

Let's see if we haven't got something that's much more pertinent here.  
(Picking up another book) Oh, here's something, here's a Dictionary of 
Psychology.  Very good, very good.  Now obviously, psychology should tell 
us a great many things which we should be well aware of.  The first thing 
it should tell us about - there should be a definition .... this is a 
psychology dictionary - there should be some sort of definition for Life.  
(Reading) "lie detector " - life? - "linen, linnet, linear perspective - 
there's no definition for Life.  Well, that's beside the point - there's 
undoubtedly here a definition.....  I hate to give a Congress off the cuff, 
you know.  I like to have authoritative material here, backing me up.  Mind, 
mind, mind, mind, mind - there's no definition here for Mind (laughing).  
Well, there's a, there's a .... undoubtedly a definition for psychology.  
I'll look that up.  Psychology, - hah!  (Reading)  "Though the very, 
though the era of definition in terms of the tenets of the various schools 
of psychology is past, there is no acceptable single sentence definition".  
Now look,  I was trying to give you an authoritative Congress here.  Lets 
look up creativeness, shall we.  (Leafing through book)  Creation, creation, 
creativeness, creativeness...  I'm sure they have a definition for that.  
The various things you know you need to make something.....  I'm getting 
very nervous here because I expected these fellows to give me a hand, you 
know.  Creative thinking - no creation, but there's creative thinking, it's 
"the achievement of a new relationship among parts of an experience" (laugh). 

Well hah (chuckle), I'm a little bit embarrassed here.  I expected some of 
these boys to back us up, you know.  There's some books there on Yogi but 
I know what they say.  They say, if you sit still long enough, you'll have 
sat still (laugh).  Well, I'm embarrassed - there go all my notes.  You can 
take these away (pointing to dolly with books).  You can take those things 
away.  I hardly know what sort of Congress to give you now.  I mean, here 
we got all of the former schools that were supposed to tell you all about 
the mind and so forth and they don't have definitions for the things that 
we consider the mind, you know, like Life and being alive.... "What'll you 
do with them"? (looking off stage) I don't care what you do with them, burn 
them - (muttering) what'll I do with them...."  But you'd think they'd have 
definitions for things called the Mind, and definitions for things called  
Man or a Woman or Life.  You'd think there'd be objects.  The other day I 
had a wonderful idea.  I was going to write a bridge book between psychology 
and Scientology, and a bridge book between psychoanalysis and Scientology.  
Now don't you think that would be nice.  We'd put them out in the book 
stores and people pick them up and they'd read all about psychoanalysis 
and then what.....(laughing).  (Looking back stage at smoke)  I hope the 
management doesn't find out about this.  I didn't mean him to take me 
literally (laugh).  Well, there goes psychoanalysis (laugh).

Well, in the fumes and flames of an expiring yesterday (laugh), we can begin 
a new tomorrow.  One of the things that is quite amazing was to start from 
nowhere, and every time I thought, in dealing with the development of 
Scientology, that we were starting from somewhere, I found that we were 
pretty well side-tracked.  A science has to have certain patterns, certain 
definitions, certain objects of study; and even if you only study thought, 
you are still studying an object if you say it is thought, you know.  You 
say, we are going to study thought.  Well, you have to find out what you 
are studying, in order to study it.  It sounds awfully funny but it's a 
brand new discovery, I assure you (chuckle).  As far as the field of the 
mind is concerned, the isolation of discovery - objects - have not been done.  
So, right away, quick like a bunny, let's just sail right in, and for the 
remainder of this Congress, I'm just gonna hit you left and right with all 
of the various isolated data which, grouped as a whole, make Clearing.  
Would you like that?  Now some of you old timers will say, oh no, not 
again and some of you new comers, they'll say, about the same subject, 
WHAT?  So, we'll take the middle course.  I'll talk to those two nice 
little girls right down there.

There are essentially four parts of what we are talking about when we are 
talking about, when we are talking about the mind, when we are talking about 
Clearing.  There are four parts and these things are very easily isolated, 
let me assure you.  This first one doesn't have any mass.  It's called a 
Thetan.  A Thetan, by definition, is something without mass, without 
wavelength, and actually, without finite location.  But a Thetan is our 
definition, or symbol use for what they used to call ghost, spirits, 
anything... elan vital, any of these various items of yesteryear.  We have 
to call it something new because all of these things meant special things.  
For instance, somebody the other day, a colored person, was discussing with 
me whether or not ghosts still existed and I settled the argument rather 
easily.  I said, "well, have you ever been a ghost?" and (feigning comm lag 
and shame), and I said, "well, I'm not ashamed of it - I have".  Well, that 
person doesn't work for us any more (laughing).  

Here is a specialized meaning to spirit.  Ghost is an evil spirit that is 
partially materialized evidently, that is found in various locations where 
they will do the real estate the most damage (chuckle).  That's evidently a 
ghost.  So, let's just take all of these things that people refer to as 
spirits or something of the sort and let's just cover that with this 
mathematical term.  Thetan isn't an esoteric or magic term, it's simply 
mathematical.  It is the Greek letter which stood for thought, but that is 
not quite precise either because thought is a product of a Thetan, not the 
Thetan.  A Thetan is potentially able to produce thoughts, matter, energy, 
space, time and all the rest of it.  So you get a basic production unit and 
therefore we are starting with an assumption.  

We have a place of assumption in Scientology.  This subject starts from 
somewhere.  That's brand new.  You don't realize it, that's brand new.  It 
doesn't start from...."well, the proclivities of the libido are very often 
introducable when you get a socio-economic libido theory".... it doesn't 
start from double-talk.  It starts from a definable thing.  We get Axiom One.  
Alright!  We say, this thing called a Thetan is capable of producing all 
sorts of things, and we say, this is the person, so therefore we differ 
enormously from the Christian statements on the subject.  They say, "you 
son, must save your soul".  The fellow says, "I don't have one".  So, 
therefore the Christian religion cannot possible be true, and they lose all 
kinds of converts that way.  The fellow doesn't find his soul - not there.  
Somebody saving his soul is doing something very interesting.  He evidently 
has something set up over here, that has probable mass, that he says is his 
soul.  And then he goes about saving it and it turns out to be a demon 
circuit called mama or something.  Now he expects this to go to Heaven.  
But this can't exist without continuous creation by that (pointing to 
Thetan symbol on his board), so he sends this to Heaven and he goes on 
elsewhere (laughing).

Very, very remarkable things go on.  You'd be surprised how man gets tangled 
up in all these things, but this tangling is called identification.  He 
begins to identify himself with things.  He says, I am a thing.  Well, 
that's all very well, you can be a thing if you want to.  A person can be 
something - yes, that's true.  But he shouldn't go whole hog and say, I am 
only that thing and nothing more and never will be anything else, because 
when it perishes, he loses his identity.  Now the funny part of it is, a 
Thetan has already a basic personality and this is what we are trying to 
uncover in Scientology in order to make a Clear.  Now, it's as easy as that 
and people keep forgetting that.  They say, well, I got half-way through 
being Clear and I knew who I was, I knew I was nobody.  Oh no, oh no!  
Half-way through a valence split, half-way through coming out from under 
the cloak of being somebody else, you have a terrible feeling of being 
exactly nobody, because that's the way you went down.  

You walked in one day and you said, "I'm a seneschal" and this knight with 
eight inch spurs, standing there - humph- and say, "I'm supposed to open the 
doors to this castle, I've been doing this for a long time and I'm a very 
trusted retainer".  "Well", he says, "I don't know about that, I married the 
old man's daughter, and we've given him poison now and you're fired". What's 
the fellow's beingness now?  His beingness depended upon somebody else's 
saying he was something and he goes around still trying to say "I am necessary, 
somebody has to open these castle doors.  I am really the seneschal".  Get 
that really, see.  He's insisting he's the seneschal but nobody will pay him 
his wages, and so forth.  He's become nobody, see.  He has the feeling that 
he is nobody.  But this doesn't reveal this fact.  He was somebody before 
he became the seneschal. Now, as a seneschal, he became nobody - until he 
finally went out and got a begging pan on the highway and began to hold it 
out for fish and chips as people came along, you know, and people keep handing 
him something.  Now he says, "I am something, I am a beggar", but that's still 
something. Then the New York State police come along or somebody, and they 
say to him, I'm a little mixed up in my periods here, but they say to him, 
"do you realize you cannot beg upon the public road without licence number 
603-F" and he says, "where do I get this licence?" and they say, "well, that 
bureau's been abolished" (laughing).  So, now he is again, nobody.  So he 
starves to death and kicks the bucket and there he lies there.  Now he's 
somebody, he's a corpse, but he's not dead, he's merely a corpse.  And people 
come along and say, they don't ever say you are now a corpse, they say, "look 
at that corpse", which is below his level of tolerance entirely.  Nobody is 
giving him any attention at all, and so he jumps off and does something else.  
Get the idea?  But he goes through sequences of becoming nobody - somebody, 
nobody, somebody, nobody, somebody, nobody, not necessarily on a dwindling 
spiral.  Some people get up to the point of being a happy man.  You know 
the old story of a happy man - I won't tell it - he didn't have a shirt 
(chuckle).  

This chap, in other words, was somebody until he began to identify his 
beingness with a thing. In other words, he had a personality, a beingness, 
an aliveness and particularly, potentials and capabilities and then he 
decided to be something which had limited potentials and capabilities, don't 
you see.  Well, he could keep going downhill for a long time or going out 
into other identities for a very long time and he would eventually, you 
might say, find a beingness which he was satisfied with, and which could 
go on for a long time.  But none of these beingnesses are the person.  The 
person IS the Thetan.  That is the one identification that Scientology jumps 
off with.  

Now, physics jumps off with an assumption and it has now blown the assumption 
sky wide and handsome, and that is, conservation of energy.  In the first 
place, this thing called the conservation of energy is about the poorest name 
thing you would ever do.  You could have said conservation of mass, if you 
please, but, conservation of energy?  Now all somebody's got to do is come 
along and demonstrate that energy is an impulse, and isn't anything, and 
therefore, doesn't conserve.  And the one thing that isn't conserved about 
energy is an impulse.  Why didn't anybody ever think of this?  They had this 
around for centuries, and they keep saying conservation of energy.  There is 
no conservation of energy.  There might be a conservation of potential motion.  
But they jump off from the point of conservation of energy and that is the 
stable datum on which the rest of it is built.

Now, if there is something wrong with this assumption of a Thetan, we have 
lost our stable data.  So therefore, we have to proceed to demonstrate what 
this stable data consists of, it doesn't have length, breadth, and thickness, 
and so forth.  In other words, can it be proven or demonstrated?  Well, years 
ago we started exteriorizing people, we started kicking people out of their 
heads, it wasn't necessarily good for them, but it was fun (laughing).  And 
we sure did have a good time kicking people out of their heads.  As a matter 
of fact, they talked different, and acted different, go sailing around.  
Well, that was the Person.  I even developed some electrical gimmicks to 
have somebody sail out of his head and go over and settle on the gimmick and 
have it register, and get out of the gimmick and go back in his head again.  

Fantastic, you know, and so far this basic premise has not been shaken.  
Probably because nobody's had any real opportunity to shake it because the 
one thing that very materialistic people cannot possibly confront, is the 
Thetan.  There's a process in Creation Of Human Ability called "Conceiving 
a static".  You say to somebody, you say, "alright, just get the idea 
there's a spirit up there, a nothing, a spirit, alright, confront it. Good".  
They get sick to their stomachs, people who are having a bad time.  Isn't 
that interesting - because it's too little mass for them to confront.  So 
probably this thing is quite safe for years to come.  Probably some time, 
some great controversy will rage as to how many Thetans there could be housed 
on the head of a pin (chuckle), or something of this sort.  It is relatively 
unimportant. Let's just escape the TRUTH of this, for its workability, and 
let's examine it as a workable premise, and we find out that as long as we 
use this as a workable premise, we win in Clearing, and as soon as we desert 
this as a workable premise, we lose in Clearing.  That is all there is to it.

If we consider a man to be a mass of circuits, and pictures and so on, flesh, 
blood, tobacco juice, 97 cents worth of chemistry, the army says.  I think 
the price has gone up.  I heard somebody say that in the army the other day, 
he said, it's odd that the army rescue teams and the air force rescue teams 
would go to so much work to rescue a man who was only worth 97 cents in 
terms of chemistry.  I found objection to it because of inflation and so 
forth.  It's now about $1.43 (chuckle).  Well, if we say he is so many bits 
of chemistry, we say he's just chemistry, he's nothing but chemistry, oh boy!  
We can't cure him, we can't do anything but assume the things which the 
healing sciences today have assumed, which is, if you shoot him with enough 
gook and big enough needles, that are blunt enough, often enough, or enough 
electric shock and if you rearrange his chemistry somehow or another, you'll 
make him a well person.  Well it has a very limited look. You can do just 
so much with a chemistry and all you've done is make the Thetan happier 
with the chemistry he has, that's all.  Well, that's one way of making a 
Thetan happy but it's limited because it doesn't make all Thetans happy.  
Some don't like chemistry, I'm sure there's some people here who have 
flunked the subject (chuckle).

Well, the first thing we see, the first thing we see here as an object or 
an item to study in this subject of Scientology, is a Thetan.  I say it 
doesn't matter whether you believe this or not, the point is, it's workable.  
Much more important is the fact that a result can be achieved which is 
desirable, evidently, by everybody it's worked on, by assuming this first 
assumption.

So we get out our next thing, which is the Mental Image Picture.  Now, this 
stupid little bug (pointing to Thetan symbol on his board) makes pictures.  
He makes pictures all the time, he's just gotta make pictures, gotta make 
pictures, make some more pictures, he makes some more pictures, then he 
makes some more pictures, he makes some more pictures, he makes some more 
pictures, he makes some more pictures - and finally he says, you know, I 
don't know what to do with all these pictures I'm making.  I'll just say 
they'll last forever and I'll put them out of sight or I'll say, Joe is 
doing them, and I'll put them out of sight - and we have a reactive mind and 
into that area he begins to collect every operation, every difficulty, 
everything he can't confront, and he makes a picture of it and shoves it 
behind him.  That's how we get "Get thee behind me Satan" (laughing).

Now the funny part of it is, everyone does this.  Everybody does this and 
in psychology they said that only morons and little children did, because 
the psychologist himself, no longer could. But he was still doing it, but 
he was doing it somewhere else where it was not visible, and so forth; and 
he's making these pictures, pictures, and we get the Freudian unconscious, 
we get the Dianetic reactive mind, and so forth.  It contained a record, 
evidently, of everything that had ever happened to the person, but the 
person was just making this record all the time.  He was keeping it mocked 
up, and we had the nicest game running you ever saw.

He mocked up all of his experiences, mocked them up all the time, mocked 
them up any time he half-way thought about them, or became into restimulation, 
and then he'd mock up the whole thing and not look at it, which was pretty 
good, and you got your unconscious mind.  Now these mental image pictures, of 
course, are very demonstrable.  Anybody can do this.  Sometimes they get 
into a valence that can't create and can't look, and although they can still 
make pictures, because obviously they're still creating this valence picture, 
they can't see other isolated pictures.  So, they begin to believe they 
can't see pictures, and you ask them what they're looking at and they say, 
nothing and you say, come on, take a look.  What are you looking at?  Shut 
your eyes.  Whatare you looking at?  I see nothing but blackness everywhere.

Well, what is blackness but a picture.  Did you ever see that kid stunt of 
the negro, the portrait of a negro hiding an a coal cellar at midnight.  This 
black thing, still a picture, it doesn't have any features, a picture is not 
formed.  A picture is simply a picture which would simply be a block of energy 
or mass existing in space, and you'd have this sort of thing.  And after you 
get enough of these sort of things, the person is mocking up enough of them, 
he calls it experience.  He wants to get experience.  And how does he hold 
on to experience?  He holds on to it with his ability to make stacks and 
stacks and stacks of pictures.  Wonderful!  Very, very wonderful to see the 
capability of a Thetan in lousing himself up.  He's best at that.  That's 
the one thing he's really good at.

What does he do here?  He gets lazy about making pictures, so he adapts 
another beingness to himself which makes pictures, don't you see, and he 
starts making pictures on a via of one kind or another.  We call these other 
selves, they're still merely collections of pictures, we call these other 
selves circuits or valences.  And circuits and valences and that sort of 
thing is what we're looking at, and we get all kinds of oddities.  These are 
all visible things you know.  You can just take somebody and have him make 
a picture and get him to see the thing, and you'll see people with pictures. 
These valences are quite interesting.  If you run down somebody's havingness, 
he's liable to have one of these valence or demon circuits move in on him 
and all of a sudden he'll say, "you know, something said something or other, 
but I didn't say it".  Well, he can tell the difference between himself and 
this circuit.  

What is a circuit?  A circuit is a picture of a personality, just like I was 
talking to you about.  He's got the idea that grandma was like this, so he 
makes a composite picture called grandma, which then gives him the orders 
that grandma used to give him, and he knew was necessary for survival, such 
as wash your face, put on your rubbers, sit down at the table now, no, get 
up and wash your hands, you know.  So he always does that, he sits down at 
the table, then he gets up and washes his hands, and then he goes back again.  
It's a series of orders.  

(lecture continues in part 4/12)

**************************************************






