FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST FZ BIBLE 6B/10 HCL TAPES PART 2 (1952) ** THE FIRST HALF OF THIS LECTURE IS POSTED IN 6A/10 ** We are posting separately to ARS & ACT, if a post is missing, please check the other newsgroup. ************************************************** These are the second 10 lectures in the HUBBARD COLLEGE LECTURES (HCL) Series of early 1952. This is based both on the transcripts in R&D volume 10 and an old reel-to-reel set of the tapes. The lectures cover Fac One and some discussion of Entites. We posted the first part of this lecture series last December as FZ BIBLE 1/10 HCL TAPES of 1952, FIRST SECTION. The Time Track of Theta tapes that we posted earlier last year are also from this lecture series. They fit right after the tapes in this current set of postings. We will do the final third of the HCL lectures later this year including the battle of the universes tape which has been labled confidential and is not in the R&D volumes. Note that this lecture series (mainly the final third) is the research line for NOTS. Coming Soon: The 5th ACC (The "Universes" cassettes). ************************************************** CONTENTS: 1. HCL-7 6 MAR 52 EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT 2. HCL-8 6 MAR 52 ATTACK ON THE PRECLEAR 3. HCL-9 7 MAR 52 FACSIMILES: HOW TO HANDLE RECORDINGS 4. HCL-10 7 MAR 52 INDOCTRINATION OF THE PRECLEAR 5. HCL-11 8 MAR 52 RESOLUTION OF EFFORT_AND COUNTER-EBFORT: OVERT ACTS 6. HCL-12 8 MAR 52 INDOCTRINATION IN THE USE OF THE EMETER Reposted in two parts as 6A/6B 7. HCL-13 9 MAR 52 THOUGHT, EMOTION, & EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT 8. HCL-14 9 MAR 52 DEMO: EFFORT, COUNTER-EFFORT, STRAIGHTWIRE 9. HCL-15 10 MAR 52 TRAINING AUDITORS: THE ANATOMY OF FAC ONE 10. HCL-17 10 MAR 52 RUNNING EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT Note that the first set of 10 HCL lectures ended with HCL-6A of 5 MAR 52. Note that HCL-12 consists of HCL-12 and HCL-12A on the reels. Note that HCL-16 was not part of the reels nor is it in the R&D volumes. If anyone has a copy, please post it. Note that HCL-18 was combined with HCL-27 in the R&D volumes and we will post it in part 3 of this series. The Time Track of Theta tapes are HCL-19 and 20. In cases where the reels include material that is not in the R&D volumes, the text is marked with ">". ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** CONTINUED FROM POST 6A/10 [beginning of HCL-12A reel, new R&D Vol 10 page 66] You will notice, with this machine, that a person in apathy is almost 100 percent charge. That's why they're in apathy. Don't mistake the fact, because they're low on the Tone Scale to the degree that the needle registers charge on everything. It registers charge on everything so consistently that it just doesn't move. So the person on apathy has to have the sensitivity increase needle there turned up as far as possible. And, in that wise, turned up as far as you can get it and still have a needle read. So you pull everything back down counter-clockwise about as far as it will go except the sensitivity increase, and then bring it up about as high as you can get it and still keep him on the dial. And you'll get a read with him. The trouble with an apathy case is there's just too much charge on it. You start taking the charge off the case and his tone starts coming up. It's very elementary. But the person who is very high in tone, you have to start tuning that sensitivity increase down in order to decrease the magnitude of your reading. Otherwise, you just start reading on everything. The needle just starts going around all over the place, because what you're getting there is his mental activity. He can change around his facsimiles very rapidly. And as he shifts them around, you're actually getting the mirror of his changing facsimiles. So you have to bring that sensitivity needle down on a high-toned case until you have somebody reading fairly closely. Now, want to call your attention to something on this dial. The initial dial installed in the machine originally has, on its left, falling; top is tension and over on the right is rising. This refers to tension, not to tone. The machines, as they are distributed from Hubbard College, have a banner pasted across the top that says "Tone Up, Tone Down." If you have a machine that does not have this pasted across the top, you should realize that this tension rising and falling is just exactly the opposite of tone. So actually your needle, as tone drops, goes up toward a hundred in scale. In other words, your needle goes to the right when tone is falling, and goes to the left. Originally the machine was designed for general use in psychotherapy and then was particularly designed for use in Dianetics and again designed for use in Scientology. So this small little sign hasn't come off of it yet. Later models will have this sign off of it. I want to go over it again with you - these facts Now, we put the preclear in the chair; we hand him the cans. Now, you want to be sure that he has his hands wrapped around these cans if you're using cans; you want to be sure that he is very closely connected on the terminals if you're using sponges. If you don't find this machine operating too well on the sponges provided, just go out and get a common ordinary pair of tin cans and wrap the bare wire around the lids as you bend them in and you've got two very excellent terminals. The only slight disadvantage is - on those terminals - is that they squeeze a little more easily. But actually we have our best luck with this machine just using a couple of ordinary large-size tin cans. And when I say large size, I don't know what the number of the can is: number eight can, is it, or number ten can? Audience: Number two. Number two can, This shows you I don't know my can numbers. Anyway, here we have number two cans. And they simply have a piece of plain ordinary light-cord wire - that is, half of the light-cord wire - the kind of rubber light cord that you take ahold of the two wires which are more or less joined together and you just pull on them and they come off into two insulated wires. And one of them is to this top button and one of them is to the lower button. They're just hooked on to the cans. Now, it doesn't matter whether or not this light cord is twisted or which hand he's holding which can in - that doesn't matter - he can swap them over. He can even cross his arms as he's holding the cans. Now, you make sure that he has the cans, that he's holding them in such a way that he has maximum contact of his hands on the cans, he's holding them fairly relaxedly, that his arms are fairly relaxed. Now, as he takes hold of the cans - it takes a moment or two for the cans to warm up, so it doesn't matter what you give to him first - your machine is off and all the dials on the machine are counter-clockwise as far as it can go. Reach over here - sensitivity increase button - that turns the machine on. Now, it takes a moment or two for the cans to warm up. Takes a moment or two, then, for the machine to warm up. We notice here that our preclear, just as the machine is turned on, doesn't yet cause a tremor on the needle. Needle is still at zero. Now, let's move up this sensitivity knob to a horizontal position or about 9 o'clock, and we see that this preclear - with all other knobs all the way counter-clockwise - is reading with this knob horizontal. Now we're getting a pretty good read out of it. Now, we take this range expander over here and we move it up from minus .05 up the scale a little bit until we've got this needle about center on the dial. Now, probably this preclear will read right there with that setting. LRH: Will you read right there with that setting? PC: Yes. LRH: All right. Did you ever have a girl touch you on the back of the neck? PC: Yes. LRH: I guess you did. Okay. I have to reset now the range expander over here and get the needle back on the dial. I can actually slack off this sensitivity increase needle about to 8:30 in order to give myself a little more needle latitude and bring this range expander up a trifle. Okay, now we've got it settled again. LRH: Have you ever had any auditing? PC: Yes. LRH: How long has it been since you were audited? PC: Three months. LRH: About three months? Anybody leave you stuck in any engrams? PC: Yes. LRH: What engram did they leave you stuck in? PC: Facs One. LRH: Oh, they did? Right back there, huh? Gee. Service Facsimile One. Okay. That feel comfortable? PC: No. LRH: You like your auditor for doing it? PC: No. LRH: What did you think of when I said to you "Does it feel comfortable?" What is it? What are you thinking of? PC: Stomach somatic. LRH: Stomach somatic turned on? Did he leave you parked in the stomach somatic? PC: Yes. LRH: Is there terror on that? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Is this what we have to get off the case in order to resolve it next? PC: Maybe. LRH: You got an overt act sitting on top of that stomach somatic? PC: Yes. LRH: What kind of an overt act is it? PC: This life, I guess. LRH: This life? Did you hit somebody in the stomach? PC: Yes. LRH: Would you rather I wouldn't ask you about this? PC: Yes. LRH: Have to do with a girl? PC: No. LRH: No? Guy? PC: Maybe. LRH: Baby? PC: Maybe. LRH: Maybe. Mm-hm. What's this tone rise? Is this a realization you're getting out of it? PC: Yes. LRH: Yeah. Well, what if you had to answer anyhow? PC: That wouldn't be good. LRH: That wouldn't be good. You ever been drugged? PC: Yes. LRH: Operations? PC: No. LRH: Ohhh, you had some operation or other. PC: Don't remember it. LRH: Don't remember it. Tonsillectomy? PC: I've been told that, yes. LRH: Oh, you've been told there's a tonsillectomy? PC: Yes. LRH: Uh-huh. Yeah, there's been a tonsillectomy, Didn't bother you too much though, did it? PC: No. LRH: Well, all right. What do we find on other kinds of drugging? Did you ever get awfully drunk? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. You just thought of what you did when you got drunk. A little lag there on the needle. PC: Hm. LRH: Do something pretty bad? PC: T don't remember. LRH: Don't remember. Have you ever been drugged? PC: Yes. LRH: How did it affect your stomach? PC: Badly. LRH: Very badly? PC: No. LRH: Mm-hm. Does it have anything to do with Fac One? PC: No. LRH: It doesn't? How long ago were you drugged? PC: Three thousand. LRH: Three thousand years ago? Three thousand B.C.? PC: Yes. LRH: Three thousand B.C. PC: Mm-hm. LRH: Who drugged you? Come on, a name will flash. (snap) Woman? PC: Priest. LRH: A priest? Priest drugged you three thousand years ago? Is that locked on top of Fac One? LRH: Mm-hm. Some different kind of a drug. Were you told you'd have dreams? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. As long as we were asking questions here about 1216 B.C., what did you have to do with twelve something-or-other B.C? Have anything to do with it? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Your nickname is Snake, isn't it? PC: Right. LRH: Mm-hm. You don't like that. You don't like the nickname? PC: I believe I do. LRH: You believe you like the nickname? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. You ever kill a snake? PC: No. LRH: Are you out of valence? PC: Yes. LRH: Whose valence are you in? Whose valence are you in? [to audience] I'm shifting this needle here - sensitivity increase - up to horizontal and bringing back the range expander a little bit to give the needle a little more action. [to pc] Whose valence are you in? PC: I got Father. LRH: Your father's valence? PC: Mm-hm. LRH: Is he pretty mean? PC: Maybe. LRH: No. He wasn't that mean. Your mother mean? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. You in her valence? PC: I got "no". LRH: Are you determined not to be in her valence? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. What if you found you were in her valence? PC: Whew! Commentator: The needle is now acting up, playing back and forth rapidly. > LRH: [to commentator] We got a wisper mike going in on > this tape? [unintelligible response] LRH: Okay. You ever been drugged in this life? PC: No. LRH: Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh! Have you been drugged within the last five years ? PC: No. LRH: The last four years? PC: Still no. LRH: The last three years? PC: Still no. LRH: More than five? PC: Yes. LRH: The last two years? PC: No. LRH: The last year? PC: No. LRH: The last eleven months? PC: No. LRH: The last ten months? PC: No. LRH: Nine months? LRH: Seven? PC: No. LRH: Six? PC: No. LRH: Six months ago? Five months ago? PC: No. LRH: Four months ago? PC: Still no. LRH: Oh, you suddenly realized I went out of the band. It's ten months, isn't it? Nine months? Ten months? Eleven months? All right, eleven months. What happened to you eleven months ago? PC: I was in school. Or was I? LRH: You've been told to forget this? PC: Yes. LRH: Who did it? Student? Professor? Psychology class? What did you think of? Commentator: Preclear - twenty-four-year-old male ... LRH: I said, "Student? Professor?" then what did you think of? Commentator:... very agitated. PC: I'm not thinking. LRH: You're not supposed to think about this? PC: Right. LRH: What would happen if you thought about this? Commentator: Ten-point dial drop. PC: Probably die. LRH: Mm-hm. You supposed to forget about it? LRH: Hm. What if I dug it up? Eleven months ago was what month? PC: February '51. LRH: Is it February '51 when this happened? Did it happen two or three times ? PC: I got "yes." LRH: In a row? PC: Yes. LRH: Over a period of about six weeks maybe? PC: Yes. LRH: That carry it through into April? PC: No. LRH: What did they want you to do? PC: I don't know. LRH: Who wanted you to do it? (pause) Give me a flash answer on this Was it a man? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: Was it more than one man? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: Was it two men? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: Were they men who belonged to the university? (snap) PC: Yes! LRH: Mm-hm. Did they belong to the university, or did they belong to another university? PC: I get "yes" on that. LRH: Did they belong to a group? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: What kind of a group? Commentator: Teventy-point tone drop. LRH: A word will flash. What kind of a group? (snap) PC: Rosicrucian. (sigh) LRH: Rosicrucians. Okay, boy. Did they belong to Rosicrucians? Did they belong to another group in addition to Rosicrucians? (snap) PC: Yes. Commentator: Three-point tone drop. LRH: What's the name of that group? (snap) It'll flash. (snap) PC: I got theosoghy. LRH: Theosophy? PC: But that's impossible. LRH: Why? PC: They're so fine. LRH: Oh, they're so fine. PC: They're sweetness-and-light boys. LRH: Is this part of it? PC: Yes. LRH: Is this part of the PDH, how fine they are? PC: Yes. LRH: How good they are? Do you want to be a part of them? PC: No! LRH: "No" is right. Okay. What did they drug you with? > PC: Nopal. > > LRH: Nopal? > > PC: What is that? > > LRH: In coffee? > > PC: Yes. > > LRH: Nopal in coffee. Mm-hm. > > LRH: In a drink? > > PC: Yes and no. LRH: Did they knock you out with a Mickey Finn? (snap) PC: No. LRH: Did they simply shoot you in the arm when you were asleep? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Is there an emotional shut-off in it? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: I notice you're quivering. Which arm is it? PC: Left. LRH: The left arm. Left arm. Needle go in the left arm? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Did it go in intravenously? PC: Muscular. Commentator: Three-point drop. LRH: Intramuscular. Did you just sit there and submit to it? PC: Yes. LRH: You recall it now? PC: No. LRH: Come on, let's plow it out. What do the men look like? (pause) Would something bad happen to you if you told? PC: Yes. LRH: No. It's not part of the incident. Come on, it's wide open. Let's remember it, Snake. Let's remember it. Was it in your rooms? PC: No. LRH: Was it in their rooms? PC: Yes, I guess. LRH: Mm-hm. Was it in a laboratory? PC: No. LRH: There's several of them. Their rooms? Their apartment? PC: No. LRH: Their dormitory? PC: No. LRH: Their office? PC: No. LRH: What's first cousin to an office with regard to such people? PC: Meeting place. LRH: Hm? PC: A meeting place. LRH: A meeting place. Was it in front of several people? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Do you remember walking in there? PC: No. LRH: Was the weather cold? PC: I get "yes". LRH: Was it good and cold? PC: No. LRH: Was it warm? PC: No. LRH: What were you wearing when you went in? PC: Leather jacket. LRH: You had a jacket on. Okay. And who was the first person that spoke to you? His first name will flash. One-two-three-four-five. (snap) PC: I don't want to answer. LRH: Why? PC: I just don't want to. (laugh) LRH: You don't want to? PC: No. LRH: Would it embarrass you to answer? PC: Yes. LRH: Why? Yes or no: Is the person present? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: Person is present. Now do you remember? PC: No. Commentator: Teuenty-point tone drop. LRH: You're sure, though, the person is present. PC: No, I'm not sure. LRH: You're not sure. But a name flashed, didn't it? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Got the name? PC: I get "no." LRH: No, that's not the name. Commentator: The needle is moving erratically. LRH: Is there a later incident? (pause) How is this person associated with this earlier incident? (pause) Is this person connected with it? Was this person there? (snag) PC: Yes. LRH: This person was present? (pause) Was he? PC: I got "yes." LRH: Mm-hm. Is there a later incident on this? (snag) PC: No. LRH: Any use been made of this incident? PC: No. LRH: What is this, just an experiment? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: It's very easy to audit out PDH. Nothing to it. You just audit it out with Effort Processing - there's nothing to it, see? Boil it off. Don't try to pick up the phrases, just audit it out with Effort Processing. Well, that's a fine arm quiver if I ever saw one. Good. Are you supposed to be a Rosicrucian now? PC: No. LRH: Rosicrucian ninth class or eighteenth class? PC: No. [R&D Note: Rosicrucian ninth class or eighteenth class: reference to the system of degrees in the Rosicrucian Order, an international organization devoted to the study of ancient mystical, philosophical and religious doctrines, and concerned with the application of these doctrines to modern life. Members of the order pass through different courses of training, and the ninth degree is one of the higher levels. The degrees are numbered through the twelfth; more advanced levels of training above the twelfth degree do exist, but are not designated by number.] LRH: You knew a lot of Rosicrucians? PC: No. LRH: The name of the person who held the needle will flash. One-two-three-four-five. (snap) PC: Bill. LRH: Bill. Bill hold the needle? PC: Yes. LRH: All right. What did he do with it? What did he say? How did he persuade you? Did he persuade you before he put it in? PC: No. LRH: Were you standing? PC: Yes. LRH: Were you on a platform? Oh, you were stood and then sat down in a chair? Stood and sat down on a bed? Which was it? You got the somatic in that arm? PC: No. LRH: How would you like to get the resistance to a needle penetrating? PC: All right. LRH: Get the resistance now of the point - needle penetration. Get what your arm did the moment it penetrated. Get it again. Get your resistance to that penetration. That's a boy. Get it again. Get it again. Get it again. Get it again. You getting the pain? PC: No. LRH: Hah? Yes or no: Is there a somatic shut-off here? (snap) PC: Yes. LRH: All right. The shut-off will flash when I count from one to five. One-two-three-four-five. (snap) What flashed? Is it "You won't feel this?" Some such thing? PC: I didn't get it. LRH: Get the counter-thought of somebody saying - reassuring you. Get their feeling, their emotion - reassuring you, "Oh, this isn't going to hurt, Snake." Go on. Get that feeling. Can you get it? PC: Vaguely. LRH: All right. What is the emotion? Are they being mean when they do it? Disinterested? What are they being? PC: Stupid. LRH: They're being stupid. They feel stupid to you? PC: Yes. LRH: Uh-huh. All right. The somatic shut-off - the phrase will flash when I count from one to five: one-two-three-four-five. (snap) PC: Don't get it. LRH: You're not supposed to get a single word of this? PC: That's right. LRH: Hm? Kick back against the effort again - of the needle penetration. Get it again. Get it again. Get it again. Get it again. There you are. Getting a somatic? Get it again. And again. And again. What does your right ear do at the moment the needle goes in? What's your left ear do at the moment the needle goes in? PC: It's burning. LRH: What do your knees do at the moment the needle goes in? How's the nerve in the insides of your legs feel when the needle goes in? PC: That's pain. LRH: All right. Let's feel that again. Let's get it again. Let's get it again. I Have you felt the needle penetrate yet? PC: No. LRH: What's the small of your back do when the needle penetrates? PC: Cringes. LRH: All right. Let's feel that cringe. Now let's get your own postulate. What do you want this needle to do? Do you want it to hurt you? PC: No. LRH: Do you make a postulate that you don't want it to hurt you? PC: Yes. LRH: What do you say to yourself? PC: It won't hurt. LRH: Okay. Where do you agree with them that you won't remember it afterwards? Commentator: Preclear seems very fixed on the incident. LRH: Where do you agree with them that you won't remember it? Where do you say, "That was pretty good but I won't remember it?" PC: I get that it was at the - toward the last. LRH: Toward the last? PC: Mm-hm. LRH: And you agreed with them not to remember it? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. All right. Were you ever told somebody had hypnotized you? PC: No. LRH: Oh, yeah? Have you ever been told that you shouldn't be audited? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Who told you you shouldn't be audited? PC: Don't get it. Commentator: A teuenty-point tone drop. LRH: Supposed to forget it? PC: Yes. LRH: Who told you you'd been hypnotized? PC: Still nothing there. LRH: Mm-hm. Well? You get nothing there? PC: That's right. LRH: Would you feel good if this were run out? PC: Yes, I would. LRH: Are you satisfied that - yeah - are you satisfied that there's something there? Commentator: Tone rise on it... PC: Yes. Commentator:... on that question. LRH: Good. Do you want it audited? PC: Yes. LRH: Is the word Dianetics in the incident? PC: Yes. LRH: Dianetics is good? PC: Maybe. LRH: Dianetics is bad? (pause) Dianetics can't help you? PC: I get "no". LRH: You're supposed to leave it alone? PC: Yes. LRH: Mm-hm. Does that make you leave the whole incident alone? PC: Yes. LRH: Do you yourself believe Dianetics is good? PC: Yes. LRH: Yeah. And you don't believe it's bad? PC: No! LRH: Therefore, you'd be in cross-purposes with such an incident? PC: Yes. LRH: Uh-huh. Well, get it audited out. Okay. [to audience] Now, just on procedure, we will turn the machine off and turn its knobs all the way back counter-clockwise again. Turn the machine off, and now take the cans, or terminals, away from the preclear. Otherwise you're liable to knock them together and short the machine out. [to preclear] Thank you very much. PC: Thank you, Ron. LRH: You're quite welcome. I've been waiting to get to you for some time. Quite aside (which I guess you'll have to cut off the tape), I can always spot a guy who looks spooked on a PDH, and Snake looked that way. This is, by the way, above and beyond the performance and activities of the machine. But if you can't get to something, you go in, you ask questions about hypnotism, you ask questions about drugs, you ask questions about something or other. The reason I started asking is because when this preclear sat down in the chair his arm started quivering. I called attention to it partly through the session and said his arm started quivering. But his arm started quivering almost immediately. The first thing that was alerting up or that he was offering forth to be found about himself was something about his arm. So I hit a couple of things and then wanted to know if somebody had drugged him - stuck a needle in him. I just thought maybe it was a tonsillectomy or something of the sort. We got very, very little reaction to account for a shaking arm on a tonsillectomy, So the next thing up the line, of course, to ask for is pain-drug-hypnosis. Pain-drug-hypnosis is quite common. It's a political weapon; it's used in Russia. It's used by many, many cults in the United States and over the world. It's used by various cults, and has actually been in use, to my actual knowledge through historical research, for at least thirty-two hundred years. It is very strange that something could be as common in practice as this without being more thoroughly understood by the public at large. In Dianetics, for instance, it was - people were very fond in the old days of invalidating Dianetics by saying a person cannot remember during unconsciousness. And these same people, by the way, were using drugs on preclears to make them remember. They were using drugs on patients - narcosynthesis and so forth, Dianetics was just exposing the mechanism of a pain-drug-hypnosis, actually, when it talked about this, and people objected very wildly. As I say, many cults have used this. The Greeks, the Aesculapians used pain-drug-hypnosis in order to bring "dream therapy" into existence. And it's still being used in much that same form today by some other cults which you'll find in universities and so forth - narcosynthesis and so forth. Now, he said Rosicrucians. Now, I don't know that this is a standard practice of Rosicrucianism, and certainly no order or group of people can be particularly held accountable for the actions of its particular members. > But this is well known in Rosicrucianism. A drug is > administered to the person and the person is put into > a trance and is told things. You noticed that we got this thing showing up on the machine. Undoubtedly that incident has in it a forgetter. The reason he's forgotten it is because it says, "You will not remember this; you will agree to forget this," and so forth. And so, to his analytical mind, he has agreed to blank it out. But it's not blanked out on the machine. Now, there's one thing that should be noticed in detecting PDH - as you call pain-drug-hypnosis - one thing should be noticed in detecting it, that the actual command "This will not display itself on a lie detector or with electronic devices," can shut off all parts of the incident except "This will not display itself on a lie detector." You ask that question and the machine reacts immediately. "Has this incident been specifically shut off so as not to record on a lie detector?" Bop. So you see, you can't even close one out that way. And by the way, the way you audit this stuff is relatively simple. You simply get it up into recovery as fast as you can. And it should not, however, be solidly and thoroughly tackled. It shouldn't be solidly and thoroughly tackled on a phrase by phrase, play-by-play, play-by-play account, because a preclear may be too low on the Tone Scale to stand up to it, So what you do is unburden all of its locks. Get any time he had an impulse to do it to somebody else - any time he had an impulse to do it to somebody else. Now, that's quite important, because you'll unburden the locks and the incident itself will blow clear. Furthermore, there's a basic on this incident. He says he had a stomach somatic and a stomach somatic is in Facsimile One. All right. I've given you a rundown on this machine. It will show you up most anything. If you have a local police department that you want to look into, you will be able to make the lie detector expert a little bit goggle-eyed. The lie detector expert has complete faith in his machine. It has shown him criminals where criminals exist. It does not make mistakes for him. The mistake that it makes, ordinarily, is not registering for some reason or other - sometimes somebody gets by. Very rarely, they don't register on the particular crime they're being asked for. The reason why this happens, normally is.because they are in apathy. They are too low The whole case is charge from one end to the other, and as a result they don't register. Now, that's very rare, by the way. And there's about nineteen out of a hundred people who don't react out of the machine. Those are the statistics according to lie detectors. But you vary this machine around, you ask the right question, it'll react on it. "Is there an emotional shut-off here?" Wham? The machine will go on although it is reading zero on emotion. All right. I want to tell you very specifically that many criminals are brought up on this machine, undoubtedly, and register for crimes committed long before this life. "Did you kill him?" And the machine goes bop! (snap) And the police officer is not saying "Did you kill him during this life?" Because no matter how many criminals he has going by there, every one of them has a series of past lives and every one of them has crimes. And every one of them will register on these crimes on that machine. And if you want to make a police officer in your local department, who is in charge of this machine, goggle-eyed, say, "Bring me in the most honest cop you have." And set the cop down, rig the machine on him, and then you ask this honest cop - you say, "Did you ever steal anything?" "No. No." "In any former life, did you ever steal anything?" Bap! That's why he's a cop. You can show him that by asking for incidents in past lives that everybody from the chief down to the janitor has committed crime. That's why they're in the police department. And so, I recommend to you, if you really want to spin the local police force, just walk in and start talking to the boy in charge of the lie detector machine and start asking him, has he ever asked anybody this question: "Did you ever live before this life?" And he'll tell you, "Oh, that's nonsense. You're crazy. What do you mean? You belong to some religious cult or something of the sort?" "No. No. Have you ever asked anybody this? Well, I tell you, on your next test on anyone, please ask them that question" - because he'll get a yes, you see? And make him promise that he will ask that question and put it down on his desk - "Because" you say, "it's very peculiar about this machine, the way it responds on that question." And you come back in a few days and ask him if he's asked it and he will probably be very anxious to talk to you: "What are we doing?" Here was this enormous field of this machine which was being completely unexplored - completely unexplored. Now, I've given you, relatively, a quick rundown on what you locate on this machine and how you locate it. There is a check sheet, a galvanometer check sheet, which is issued with the machine, which gives you a standard set of questions to ask which will show things up for you. I hope you understand how to use this machine and I hope it will give you some good service, because if you want to do a good job of auditing or if you're bogged down right now with your preclear, you better put a preclear on the machine up here at school and find out why. But mind you, this machine has to be cared for. You have to take good care of the machine. And if you get one of your own, for heaven's sakes, don't let anybody else use it. It'll get so temperamental you won't even be able to talk to it. Thank you very, very much for your kind attention to those who came up here and volunteered to be quizzed. Thank you and good night. (end of lecture) *******************