From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Fri Apr 23 18:00:15 1999

Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!198.138.0.5!newshub.northeast.verio.net!news.he.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news

Date: 24 Apr 1999 01:00:15 -0000

Subject: FZ BIBLE 2/10 HCL TAPES PART 2 (1952)

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology

From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>

Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to

	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity

	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.

Message-ID: <6635092facb2c80f650b712f6f93f6f4@anonymous.poster>

Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net

Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net

Lines: 1224

Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:741625



FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



FZ BIBLE 2/10 HCL TAPES PART 2 (1952)



We are posting separately to ARS & ACT, if a post is missing,

please check the other newsgroup.



**************************************************



These are the second 10 lectures in the HUBBARD COLLEGE

LECTURES (HCL) Series of early 1952.  This is based

both on the transcripts in R&D volume 10 and an old

reel-to-reel set of the tapes.



The lectures cover Fac One and some discussion of

Entites.



We posted the first part of this lecture series last December

as FZ BIBLE 1/10 HCL TAPES of 1952, FIRST SECTION.



The Time Track of Theta tapes that we posted earlier last year 

are also from this lecture series.  They fit right after the 

tapes in this current set of postings.



We will do the final third of the HCL lectures later this

year including the battle of the universes tape which has

been labled confidential and is not in the R&D volumes.

Note that this lecture series (mainly the final third) is 

the research line for NOTS.



Coming Soon: The 5th ACC (The "Universes" cassettes).





**************************************************



CONTENTS:



1.  HCL-7   6 MAR 52 EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT

2.  HCL-8   6 MAR 52 ATTACK ON THE PRECLEAR

3.  HCL-9   7 MAR 52 FACSIMILES: HOW TO HANDLE RECORDINGS

4.  HCL-10  7 MAR 52 INDOCTRINATION OF THE PRECLEAR

5.  HCL-11  8 MAR 52 RESOLUTION OF EFFORT_AND COUNTER-EBFORT: OVERT ACTS

6.  HCL-12  8 MAR 52 INDOCTRINATION IN THE USE OF THE EMETER

7.  HCL-13  9 MAR 52 THOUGHT, EMOTION, & EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT

8.  HCL-14  9 MAR 52 DEMO: EFFORT, COUNTER-EFFORT, STRAIGHTWIRE

9.  HCL-15 10 MAR 52 TRAINING AUDITORS: THE ANATOMY OF FAC ONE

10. HCL-17 10 MAR 52 RUNNING EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT



Note that the first set of 10 HCL lectures ended with

HCL-6A of 5 MAR 52.



Note that HCL-12 consists of HCL-12 and HCL-12A on the reels.



Note that HCL-16 was not part of the reels nor is it in the

R&D volumes.  If anyone has a copy, please post it.



Note that HCL-18 was combined with HCL-27 in the R&D volumes

and we will post it in part 3 of this series.  The Time Track

of Theta tapes are HCL-19 and 20.



In cases where the reels include material that is not in

the R&D volumes, the text is marked with ">".





**************************************************



STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************





HCL-8 ATTACK ON THE PRECLEAR



A lecture given on 6 March 1952



(56 min) (rerecorded 1973 by the Apollo)



Want to talk to you about the attack on the preclear - the

attack on the preclear, Of course, it really isn't an

attack on the preclear at all; it's an attack on the

preclear's aberrations.



Because, really, if you attacked the preclear directly, you

would find out that you had selected him as the

counter-effort and selected as your effort his aberrations

and, of course, would swamp him.



Now, however much this has been in practice in old

psychetherapy, however much this has been done here and

there, it is not advisable in this field to select the

aberrations of the preclear as your allies. Because then

you line them up so that you and his aberrations attack him

and his basic personality, and of course he won't come up

the Tone Scale.



What you want to do is take the preclear as your effort and

select out as the counter-effort his aberrations.



Now, when you walk up to a preclear and you say

something-"You're always saying something or other,

something or other. Well, who said that!" Now, you're

making yourself big, tough and strong by making an ally, an

effort, out of his counter-efforts, and you're attacking

him. Therefore, you reduce him on the Tone Scale quite

markedly.



If you walk up to him and said - no matter how strange  this

might sound to him - if you walked up to him and said, "You

know, knowing the family you've got, you must be an awfulIy

tough guy to kick back all these aberrations." He'd come up

the~one Scale whether he liked it or not, even though he

might say, "What a corny remark" or something of the sort.

He couldn't help it because you've selected him as an

effort and his aberrations as a counter-effort.



Now, one of the mechanisms of society in the control of

individuals is:  "Criticism is good for you.  We are giving

you constructive criticism," Now, if you give a person

enough constructive criticism, he'll cease to exist. If

you give an artist enough constructive criticism, he will

utterly cease to "art."



This practice in the American university is responsible for

the fact that the American university has proven itself

completely incapable of teaching any of the arts, in any

university, in any part of the country, under any

management. I don't want to be particular or selective

about this.



A poll ofthe American Fiction Guild in the old days

demonstrated that we had one major in English literature in

our midst - one - who had studied writing in a university, It

was a good university, and he'd studied all the way through

and he'd gotten A straight through to the end. This fellow

was a literary agent, Now, you see, that set him up

beautifully.



Now, all of our constructive criticism, examining the

fellow on this and examining the fellow on that, and doing

something or other about trying to grade him and make him

better and improve his imagination and do this about him

and do that about him and do something else, is validating

his inabilities and invalidating his abilities.



Now, the field of the arts must be of all things the most

selfdetermined of any of man's activities. An artist who is

not operating on his concept and his own interpretation, or

a group of artists which are not operating on their

interpretation of the material universe and the human race

and the dynamics in general, will not produce art! This

accounts for Hollywood. [audience laughter]



Now, when we have, then, constructive criticism, we only

have a vicious method of reducing an individual's

self-determinism,  his ability and his reasoning powers - to

keep him from producing. Grim!



"But, you know, you have to accept it because it's - I'm

saying it for your own good, And I wouldn't really tell you

this, but people really don't like you and if I - you know,

they of course don't like to admit it - they don't say it to

your face or anything like that - but if you'd just dress

better, I think you'd get along fine," That's a very overt

level.



And, "Yes, my dear, I think your hat is just stunning; I've

thought so for years." That's on a covert level, But that's

all on the same line, What passes for conversation amongst

the "normals" today is actually very bitter, destructive

invective, if you want to know the truth. Now, the

criticism I have made of the American university and its

utter and complete and dismal inability to instruct in the

field of the arts is not intended personally for anyone in the

universities And it is said only in sympathy for a student

who has been subjected to this line.



The American universities two years ago graduated two

hundred and eighty thousand Bachelors of Art - no artists.

Supposing you graduated into a society two hundred and

eighty thousand clear-eyed, well-trained, well-schooled,

practiced artists. You would see that society change in its

shape, color and structure in a single generation above the

maddest dreams of anyone.



Two hundred and eighty thousand artists. They wouldn't have

to graduate another one for a long time. And that alone as

an act in one single year would change the entire society.



Now, you see! You see what validating the individual as an

able being might do instructionally!



Well, a preclear is making himself very, very vulnerable

indeed when he permits himself to be audited. And he is

expecting you to validate him and his self-determinism as

much as possible and fight against his aberrations. Your

constant hammering and insistence that he is succumbing to

his aberrations will cause him to succumb to them. Because

what you're doing is telling him, "Now, the reason you

can't run these is because you can't run them because

they're too strong for you, and you actually are them, and

how do you know that these aren't you, and where are you

anyway?" He would become in very, very bad condition.



Actually, the whole art of addressing a preclear is the art

of validating and inviting the confidence of himself, in

himself.



In order to produce good, solid results with a preclear,

you have to validate his ability to run an incident. You

could even cheer a preclear up through an incident where

he's suddenly bogging, by not giving him sympathy. Not

invalidating him, you understand, but don't give him

sympathy - saying, "Yes, I know it's awfully tough, but

let's try to run it anyway."



You should tell him, "Well, go ahead, the worst it can do

is kill you" - something on that order. You consider it's a

sort of a crack he isn't quite expecting out of you; you're

not giving him sympathy. Therefore if you don't give him

sympathy, it means you don't pity him. That means he's not

down Tone Scale. That means he can probably run it.



Or if you said to him, "Well, go ahead, let's get rid of

this lock where this truck runs over you and get in some

real stuff," And by golly, that truck incident, if you say

that, even if he knows you're joking, has a tendency to

bloeu just on that, because he changes his evaluation of

the incident.



People who stand around somebody that has had an accident

occur to them and say sympathetic things: "You poor fellow.

I'm so sorry that it happened. Oh, how will - I'll do my

best to help you get over this." It means, "You poor boob,

I can't possibly see how you would ever recover from

anything like this, you weakling, and somehow or other I am

going to give you enough of a helping hand so you can get

your jellylike limbs and spirit into line."



I mean, let's put it in different words and retain the same

meaning, and that's what sympathy is.



Now, there are three levels of doing something for a

preclear, One is to do something for him and get him over

his aberration, and the next is to make him comfortable,

keep him up along the line, keep his tone from dropping

any; and if you can't do that, you can give him sympathy.

Because if you can't do steps one and two for him, he must

be almost dead. He is so close to the bottom and so close

to being on his way out that of course, if you gave him

sympathy, it would bring him up to 0.5 or something.



Sympathy is a two-edged sword. It is a weapon used by the

overtly vicious to kill. And it is used also by individuals

upon the almost dead to get them up enough so they'll live.

It depends where a preclear is whether you really can give

him any sympathy at all or not. But I have never found

sympathy to pay off.



A preclear came in one time, I rernernber this guy, this

fellow was a wonderful case, an example of the fact that

motion goes through an apathy case - goes through apathy.

Because if you had picked up his little finger and touched

it again, you just - motion would have just gone through it.

You probably could have taken a sword and run him through

the middle, and he probably would - never would have

quivered. It just would have gone through him. He wouldn't

even have looked through you - at you reproachfully. I mean,

that would have required too much motion. He was really

almost gone out the bottom.



And he came in and he sat down and he started talking a

little bit about "how horrible the world had been to him."

Well, now I didn't tell him that the world was horrible to

him so that it stuck. I sympathized with him. Oh, I just

sympathized with him all over the place.



And all of a sudden he realized I couldn't be possibly

sympathizing with him to this extent, and he started to get

annoyed. And he came clear up to 1.5. And he came up from

1.5, tapered off to about 2,2, and he ran like a well-oiled

clock afterwards. The way I did this, simply, he'd tell

me, "My ~other - and my mother was always mean to me and she

beat me every day."



And I would say, "Gosh, every day. Did she beat you Sundays

too!" (laughter) And he'd start in on it to give you - some

sympathy again and then you would say, "Oh, on Sundays!

Then she wasn't a Christian, was she!" No - just non

sequitur about this whole thing. And he came up the Tone

Scale and he showed me he could run engrams -

"Raaaaah-rrrahrrrrah! "  - he ran engrams.



All right. Your attitude toward the preclear is

differentiated by whether or not you're willing or

unwilling to do anything for the preclear, and then

whether you're going to validate the preclear or validate

his aberrations.



Now, your willingness or unwillingness to help him will be

dependent upon whether or not you have any sneaking idea in

the back of your head as to whether or not you're going to

use any of his aberrations or not for your own control of

him. Just ask yourself that.



You very often find out the preclear reminds you of your

greataunt Agatha that you would dearly love to have busted

the head of. And Aunt Agatha you were never able to control

but, boy, you sure can control this preclear now. Ha-ha!

And you're going to get there. And the next thing you know,

you find yourself just butchering this preclear,



And you say, "I wonder why I'm doing that!" Butcher,

butcher, slash, cut. "Well, you've only got that half run

out. Well, let's go on to this later incident." Knowing

full well that later incidents reduce much less easily than

earlier incidents,



So it's a very good thing to ask yourself, "Let's see. Is

there any reason why I don't want this preclear to get

well!" And you're liable to straightwire out of a very

startled you, the fact that you don't want this preclear to

get well.  Why not! Well - uh - umm...  perhaps you've got

this feeling like this person needs sympathy. And then you

find out that this girl reminds you of the first girl you

had in this life and this girl jilted you and you felt very

sorry for it ever since. But when she did come back and

tried to make it up with you, you found out that by being

mean to her that made her feel - you know, and you get

this terrific computation just going around in your head

about some girl way back someplace or other that has

nothing to do with this preclear.



So you want to ask yourself that question. And you'll blow

out these similarities of earlier persons to the preclear

or difficulties which you are having in present

time - financial, social, familial; any difficulty you're

having in present time that might make it desirable for

this preclear to stay on his present plane instead, of

rise.



Be fair with yourself. You very often discover that in

spite of you being you and being fully, actually determined

to do your level best in this one particular case, there's

a little bug there that if you got it out and recognized

it, all of a sudden, you'd find the preclear very easy to

run.



Now, there's this one: You're about to run a preclear

through an incident which you haven't had run on you - a

standard incident like Facsimile One. And you want to ask

yourself, "Now, do I want to run this preclear!" You want

to recognize "I haven't had Facsimile run yet. And it's

possible if I run Facsimile One on this preclear,  I'm

liable to get restimulated. These somatics are liable to

turn on," so on~ "Am I willing to take this aboard!" And if

you decide flatly that you are: "Sure, all right; so it

doesn't matter. I probably won't get restimulated, Let's

postulate that I won't, But if I do, it doesn't matter. And

I'm going to go ahead and run the preclear." And you'll

find out, then, that you won't be hauling out of this

session halfway through and saying, "Oh, I can't go on,

I've got such a terrible headache. My teeth are all

hurting, and that something that just hit me in the

stomach. I just can't go on running this preclear. "



So you want to take care of that one. And if halfway

through the session, you find for some specious reason - you

somehow or other realize this is specious - that you want to

quit this session although the time isn't up, you want to

knock off and go someplace else and you suddenly remembered

an appointment somewhere or other, you grab yourself by the

nape of the neck (you can, you know) and you say to

yourself, "Now, let's see, um, why do I want to end this

session!" And you'll find out they just hit something that

was probably very hot - in you! And so you just grit your

teeth and carry on. You see, you can.



There isn't any reason you have to either go down Tone

Scale or be restimulated or anything else if you don't want

to be. The liabilities of your auditing of the preclear is

just something that you should assess for every preclear

you run. And you ought to kind of look it over before each

session you run on the preclear just to see if this is all

right now, we're all clear and we're going to run fine, and

it's fine.



If you want to be super-cautious before you've had

Facsimile run on yourself completely out, why, you do this.

And you'll find that your auditing is much better.



For instance, one day - I seldom was anywhere near the old

Foundation, any one of the old Foundations, almost never

inside their doors after the month of July 1950 - and I ran 

into an auditor, a staff auditor, in the hall and I said, "How 

are you getting along! I understand, somebody told me over the

phone, that you're - were running a psychotic. How are you

getting along!" "Huuhh. Well, it's all right. It's

fine - and - hm ..." Goodness. I turned around to somebody

and I said, "How's the psychotic!" "Well, her husband took

her home yesterday." "Well, she was only here two days."



"Well, they had to. The psychotic went into hysterics and

wouldn't stay around. Husband took her home and couldn't do

anything for her. Dianetics couldn't help her." That's what

they were practicing then. 



"So what gives!" I said.



"Well, she just was such a terrible psychotic, there just

was no possible hope for doing anything about her at all!

And so I couldn't do anything for her, so the humane thing

to do was to permit her to be taken home." 



And I said, "When did you have anything to do with psychotics!" 

And this auditor kind of gulped and said, "Well, I was a

psychiatric aide in Brooklyn Medical Terminal Spinbin or

some such name.



And I said, "Oh, you were!" I said, "Did you ever have any

experience with a psychotic who reminded you of this

woman?" And this girl had been standing there, this

auditor, she'd been shaking - she was usually a very good

auditor - and she was just shaking all over up to this

point.



And all of a sudden said, "Ohhh! Oh, yes!" She hadn't had

an experience, she'd had a cataclysm!



This auditor had been attacked by the almost exact facial

and physical duplicate of the preclear that had come in, 

had been attacked, clawed, had one eye almost pulled out,

had her hair pulled out by handfuls and nobody had come to

her rescue. And she just buried the whole incident and let

this poor psychotic be taken home, four or five hundred

miles away, by omitting step one.



When she went into the incident with the psychotic, when

she started to work with the psychotic, she had no

restimulation, no inkling of the fact there would be

anything wrong. But before she had been working with her

for five minutes, there was something wrong.



Instead of stopping the session at that moment and saying

to myself, "Somehow or other this person restimulates me;

there is some reason why I can't make this person well" and

going outside and getting a cup of coffee and let the

preclear sit there on the couch and contemplate the sins of

the world or something of the sort, this auditor goes on

plowing along, plows the preclear into more somatics, more

somatics.



What's this auditor trying to do to this preclear? She's

trying to cripple the preclear so the preclear can't attack

her? And being an auditor and working with - faster than

light with how do you cripple a preclear, well, you turn on

enough somatics and leave enough of them turned on so the

preclear is completely crippled up and can't strike you and

claw your eyes out and pull your hair out.



And she recognized even the computation, the second that

she got this one. You see what this could mean to her?



You can call this "clearing for the session," And if you

clear just by recall for the session, you'll find out that

you will spend much less time in the session.



If you went and sat down in a corner facing the wall and

said the alphabet backwards a couple of times and went

through several rituals, and it took you two hours before

every session to find out and scan and work with and get

out of the road of every reason why you didn't want this

preclear to be well, you would save time on three hour

sessions - if you spent two of those three hours figuring

out why you didn't want this preclear well. Because

Facsimile One says, "You don't want anybody well. People

are dangerous. People had better be controlled." And it

will form locks right up into near present time.



An auditor, after he's audited preclears for a while

gets - when he's not had his early incidents run - gets into

a state whereby he is strong enough to carry on forward and

try and try and try, and he thinks he's fighting preclears,

and he's not fighting preclears at ail. He's fighting the

sum total of all the times he didn't clean up preclears

before he audited them - on himself.



And he just gets to a point finally where he feels like

he's wading through glue, and preclears stop running for

him because he's elected them as counter-efforts. He's

elected them as individuals as counterefforts, he's elected

their aberrations as counter-efforts, he's elected

everything as counter-efforts and then he elects himself as

a countereffort against himself. Why not just throw a bomb

at the preclear and let it go at that? (laughter)



There's notfiing very mystical or metaphysical about this; 

this is very factual because it will show in your voice tone. 

It will show in your general attitude toward the preclear no

matter how much you try to suppress it.



Since I had a preclear once that I - just out of orneriness

I suppose - I detested him. To this day I've never wiped up

this preclear in the bank. I detested him, so I've

continued to elect him as counter-effort.



He came over and after the most terrific agitation,

invalidation, screaming, arguing, reneging and so on,

consented to each session each time.



You would spend two or three hours of every time you

audited him, out of maybe four or five hours, arguing with

him about pointless things, about this and that. And he was

so insidiously clever that he could get through the armor

somehow or other.



And he'd mutter things under his breath instead of running

engrams. He'd say, "Aw, you insidious fool, why, you're

certainly a Pompous One, aren't you?" "Uh, what did you

say?" you'd say to him.



"I didn't say anything," he'd say, completely reversing

your reality on everything and so on. And then he would

suddenly start to brag about having done the most

gruesomely detestable things - ooh? Oh, you know, like

sadistic rape of little children and so on. And be so proud

of it? So happy about the whole thing.



Well, you can drive them up the Tone Scale or drive them 

down. ( laughter)



After my fourth session with him, I'11 tell you, he was

polite after that. He was polite to everybody!



A long while Later, another auditor got ahold of this

preclear and started bringing the preclear up the line and

got him back up the Tone Scale to where he was his old self

again, and learned all about how he was a case failure as

far as I was concerned.



Of course, the preclear got about four or five sessions

after that and got driven back down the Tone Scale again.

(laughter) Now, that's one of the reasons I invented the

Handbook for Preclears. Now, you be very, very cognizant

of this fact: Every once in a while you're going to get

ahold of somebody that you just would rather drown. You

would just rather burn them alive inch by inch than even

touch them. You might not find out why, if you haven't got

the basic facsimiles run out.



If you're  crowding  through  this and working anyhow 

without having had a complete clear of your own bank,

you'll run into this once in a while. And you'll search in 

vain: "Is he like Grandpa? Is he like Grandma? No, I like 

Grandpa and Grandma. Is it like that hired man? No, it wasn't 

the stable boy that beat the horse. Who was it?" You'll find

out it was somebody in the year 1035 A.D. or something like

that, that burned a nun who was a friend of yours, or

something of the sort. I mean, it'll be something very

deep, buried, and involved and long lost.



By the way, you can put yourself on a psychometer and ask

yourself, "Is there any reason why I don't want to audit

this preclear?" And if there is, it'll go bop And you'll

say, "Is it in this life?" No answer. "Earlier life? How

early? Ten lives ago? Twenty lives? Two thousand years ago?

Thousands of years ago? Tens of thousands of years ago?"

Bop.



And you find out this preclear looks something like a

monkey And you suddenly get this little somatic of a monkey

eating your nose off while you lie dying or something. Oh,

anything, it doesn't matter, but you can actually find it

on the machine.



But once in a while you might not have a machine handy and

you'd just rather kill this preclear - or once in a while,

the preclear himself is a walking, living overt act.

(laughter) At that moment (and this is not the sole reason

for that - oh no, very far from it), but at that moment when

you recognize that the situation is going to be very rough

and so forth, you get somebody in his environment who

detests this person or who wants to force this person,

control this person; explain to them how this handbook will

make it possible to do so invariably; and then make them

responsible for making sure the preclear works the

handbook. And the preclear will come back to you much less

detestable and easier to run. This is something which - one

use of the handbook.



But the attack on the preclear must include the fact that

some preclears, even to the most saintly of us, just plain

don't deserve to get a bit better! (laughter) 



[At this point there is a gap in the original recording,] 



You'll find that many preclears will use the most obviously

reasonable but completely specious reasons as to why you

aren't doing a good job. They will find reasons why you

aren't doing a good job. They will find reasons to drop

curves on you.



You can fully expect a preclear - fully expect a

preclear - to be enormously benefited by a single session,

and suddenly drop a curve on you to an extent that if you

weren't on, guard about this sort of thing, would rather

leave you gasping.



Because there you sit all proud of having made this

preclear better, then the preclear says, "Well, I've seen

better auditing in a slaughterhouse," or something.



What you've done, if you are taken aback by this, is failed

to estimate where you have brought the preclear to on the

Tone Scale. Because you quite often are auditing somebody

below - well below 2,0, well below 1.0, quite often, without

really realizing it, until you see them start coming up

through the bands.



Wham - up they'll come. They'll come up to covert hostility.

Covert hostility, remember, is a better and higher tone

than grief, regardless of how simple it seems to be to get

along with a person who is in grief or in apathy. You pick

up their hand and you put it there and they stay there. And

you say, "You're supposed to say something now," and they

say something. You're their self-determinism in this case.



But as you bring this person up the line, they get up to

1.1 or 1.5 and they'll drop a horrendous curve on you,

maybe very overtly and maybe very covertly.



They may say suddenly - you were getting along just fine

with this preclear - this little girl, she's so pathetic and

she seems so sweet and everything, and you were helping her

out so much. And suddenly she says, "I probably shouldn't

tell you this but you remember the preclear you audited

last week? You know, the one that you helped so much. Well,

I think her family put her in an insane asylum yesterday."

Zzzzoom! See? Builds you up - you're getting proud, you see,

of the fact you've done something - and then "Zzzong!" drop

the curve on you quick? Or just suddenly crowds you with

anger.



You see, if you retaliate in tone, you will push them back

down to where you didn't want them in the first place and

undo your own work.



Now remember, you're being agreeable with this preclear,

you're in affinity with this preclear and so forth, and so

you can be taken very much by surprise by it. Because your

tone - you're estimating their tone as apathy, so in being

agreeable with them, you are actually to some slight degree

putting yourself in apathy. And you've brought them up the

Tone Scale and they suddenly hammer apathy with anger. And

so it comes down on you rather heavily sometimes if you

don't understand this clearly.



Now, if you get a preclear up over 2.0, you're sailing. Of

coursg, you have to be prepared for the 2.5 band. And the

2,5 band says "Well, I'm getting along fine anyhow; there

isn't much use to it. I don't know why we're putting in all 

this work. I guess it's all run out anyhow right now; it's 

all done - as much as can be done. There isn't much use in 

going on. I haven't - there isn't much to live for anyway, 

but if you don't care, it doesn't matter."



Of course, that's a sort of a mixture of - it sounds like

apathy to you - it sounds like they're back down at the

bottom. They're not. They're just hitting 2.5.



Then they'll start in on this level: "Well, there's uh,

uh - oh, it's fine. It's run out. It's run out. Oh, I'm so

sick of running this. Why do I have to go through it again?

I have to run out - it's - I'm tired of it." They're at

2,5 - and just a hair above.



Now, the next time you run the incident through on them,

they're liable to be up - or the next time you see them in

the session - they're liable to be up a little bit more than

that so that they are being flippant and are apparently

really up there high, you know?



They're talking about Mother and they're saying, "Well, the

old lady does so-and-so and then, of course, after she

soaks my head in a barrel of boiling tar, so forth, why,

then we go on with the rest of the accident, and so forth,

and that's all there is to the incident." And you're

supposed to say, "Ha-ha-ha," and let it go because there

can't be any more to it. Oh no! You see, the incident

you were running was this individual getting burned or

something, and Mama dropped the grease on it and it felt

hot or something. They have made a remark which indicates

there is still content to the incident.



Now, how you get that without really crowding him and

saying, "Look, you're still talking out of your

aberrations" - you don't want to tell preclears that.

They're practically doing nothing else but talking out of

their aberrations when you first get ahold of them, but

that's the point. You don't want to validate this.



"Well, let's run it again just to make sure." And then

they'll run this incident which suggested actually getting

their head boiled in tar or something. They meant this to

be very flippant.



When they come up to a complete release on the incident, it

is funny. It's funny. They'll laugh about it. They're

liable to laugh about it far beyond anything you ever

expected to be laughed. That is sometimes very, very

discouraging to an auditor when he can't stop a preclear

from laughing. Because it will sound to the preclear's

family like he's suddenly gone into hysterical mania of

some sort and has gone completely insane because he can't

stop laughing. And the laughter seems to be rather strained

to them and forced because it's awfully loud and "he never

laughed before."



This preclear is practically blowing his whole life and

he's blowing it at umpteen decibels. That is a line charge.

And I have seen preclears go on a line charge for days and

days and days. The longest line charge I think I've seen

offhand is about seven days. Once in a while, the old

Foundation used to get somebody up to four or five hours,

sometimes ten hours, sometimes twenty-four hours - rarely

anything beyond that. It's very beneficial. If you can get

a preclear started on a line charge, you show him any word,

any phrase, and he will promptly start to go out on another

blast of laughter. What he's doing is blowing the whole

chain of associations.



If you start feeding him things that are very sad, he will

laugh even harder. So you say, "Well now, look, Look, take

this seriously. Let's be serious" - reverse vector on him,

see. He's laughing: you're trying to get him to be serious.

And the more you try to get him to be serious, the harder

he'll laugh, by the way. And you say, "All right, now,

let's remember something sad. Let's remember the time your

mother almost died."



"Oh, yeah? Ha-ha." And then off into another roaring spin 

of laughter.



What's he laughing about? Well, he's laughing off sudden

relief from the recognition of the fact that his mother

didn't die. He'll express it in some other way. And you

keep a preclear rolling on this.



Now, another thing that will happen to an auditor is you

get a preclear halfway through an incident and the preclear

starts to scream. Now, preclears can scream. Don't disabuse

yourself of the idea that a preclear won't scream. A

preclear screams.



I had a preclear one time start screaming at two o'clock in

the morning. Came in, leaned on the doorjamb, almost

collapsed in my arms - was in horrible shape, he said, and I

ran him - just started to lock-scan off the data. And he

ran right straight into the incident which an auditor had

nicked but hadn't run. This fellow was in terrible shape

anyhow. He was a psychotic.



But ran into the beginning of this incident and started to

scream. The windows were down, it was two o'clock in the

morning, and the complaint came from two blocks away.



You talk about volume of sound? A human being can't make

that much sound, that's all there is to it! It's completely

ear-shattering, nerve-shattering, R-r-r-r-r,r-r! What

sound volume you'll run into with some of these.



Sit there and cover up your ears and say, "Go over it

again." That's kind of rough for bn auditor to face, by the

way - a screamer.



Or a terror charge: A terror charge can be so great that it

will actually make the bed chatter up and down against the

floor. An anger charge can be so heavy that a preclear is

liable to bang his fist right straight through a wall. Been

done many times. A preclear may be so involved in the

incident he's running, he's so completely unaware of his

environment, he is utterly revivified in the incident, that

he'll start banging his head against the wall, actually

maiming himself. Well, of course, what you ought to do is 

.. Well, it's a good thing to try to interpose a pillow

between himself and the wall.



And a preclear will roll back and forth on the bed

sometime. You as an auditor, by the way, go through

terrific gyrations watching the preclear do this and do

that, because you'll brace yourself, you see, to keep the

preclear from rolling off the bed, and you'll reduce your

own vocal cords to keep his from bursting and you'll try to

make tears come in your eyes to make him cry and all sorts

of weird things. You'll pick up his somatics so he can get

rid of them. And by the way, you'll turn on your own

somatics so that you can get his on. You try and try and

try to turn on his somatics, his somatics, his somatics,

and all of a sudden your own come on. His don't.



And in short, in short, you can really work at this, and

when you have engrams - particularly Facsimile One and so

on - in place yourself, why, you've just got to be prepared

to go through a little more hell than you would ordinarily

expect in the routine business of living.



But at no time should an auditor ever back down - should an

auditor ever back down! At no time should an auditor ever

fail to finish off an incident regardless of the mood,

words or emotion of the preclear.



You realize that people low on the Tone Scale - below

4.0 - have a great deal of difficulty in committing overt

acts. Auditing looks like an overt act. Maybe someplace,

maybe you killed some girl or a cat or something and it

screamed and you were sorry for it afterwards. The preclear

starts to scream, and all of a sudden you get the idea that

you're committing an overt act against the preclear. So you

haul off and try to make it up to the preclear by patching

him up somehow or another instead of letting him scream.



You have to be willing as an auditor to butcher that

preclear - just butcher him from a standpoint of letting him

scream, letting him run somatics, letting him hurt, letting

him emote and so on. That is not an overt act.



It'll just be some old overt act of your own against

another dynamic which will go into restim sometimes in

running a preclear. It makes you appear to be in the position 

of an offender. The reaction of an offender is to try to regret 

it and make it up to. And, of course, that's sympathy and that'll 

ruin your preclear!



So sometimes you'll be running this incident and the

preclear will go into a terror charge and start to scream

.. And what do you do?



You say, "My God, here I am making him scream. I guess I'm

choking him," which is what you did some - at some earlier 

time to somebody.



And you say, "Well, um, um, uh, are there any locks on

this? Are there any locks on this? Is there any present

time locks on this?" And the preclear will say, "Yeah. Hm,

yeah," He'll stop screaming. "Yeah, there's a present time

lock on this," "What happened?"



"Well, I saw this little girl scream. Yeah. I think Mother

was taking a sliver out of her finger and she was

screaming. That's right." "Well, begin at the beginning of

this lock."



Whoohh. And you feel this terrific sensation of relief

inside yourself. "Gosh, I guess I got out of that."



Yeah, you got out of it, but you left the preclear in a

terror charge. You can make people pretty sick doing this

to them. Run it through! Bull it through! Slam it through!

One way or the other.



The best remedy for an auditor, of course, is to be in a

frame of mind where he's willing to commit any overt act in

order to get the preclear well - -any overt act to get the

preclear well. Frame of mind.



By the way, that frame of mind of rather - even flippant

determination -  "Well, go ahead, run it! So it'll kill you;

go ahead, run it. You say your lungs are sore from

screaming? Well now, let's see, let's see. Maybe if we ran

that earlier incident, why, maybe you could really blow

them out of your chest. Let's run it!" And you'd be

surprised how many times a preclear who is low on the Tone

Scale will respond to this and come up Tone Scale toward

your level and run it. But you have to be willing to commit

an overt act.



That doesn't mean that you actually will go out and get a

baseball bat and hit him over the head with it. But if you

were to think that hitting him over the head with a

baseball bat would run out the incident and make him well,

hit him over the head with a baseball bat. I mean, that's

got to be your mood. "We're going to make this person well.

Wham. The only thing that's making him sick is aberration.

He wants to be well and I want him to be well. So what?

Let's roll. He's going to get well, that's all there is to

that." Surety. Consideration.



You take a business which is managed by an individual who

is afraid to hurt people. That business is going to fail.

The employees are going to be unhappy and there's going to 

be a lot of people hurt. Lots of people are going to get 

hurt by somebody who is afraid to hurt people.



Now, the point I'm making is that you can hurt a lot of

preclears by being afraid to hurt them. Because the only

way you can hurt a preclear is to keep him from running

incidents. And if you can restrain him enough from running

incidents, if you can keep him from running that grief, if

you can keep him from running off that terror, if you can

keep him from throwing - going through these convulsions,

why, you're all set. You've made him sick for keeps. Not

that another auditor couldn't undo it. But you're liable to

spoil his accessibility. And some other auditor is liable

to have to pick this preclear uay up from the bottom.

Why? Because you didn't want to hurt him. So you

sympathized with him: that could be very serious. The

Auditor's Code as contained in the book Science of Survival

is a very, very good thing to know. There are two

particular things that you must not do.



You must not invalidate the preclear's data. You mustn't

tell him "Oh, that's dub-in, Let's run something real. Oh,

you know better than to run that; let's run something

else."



How do you know it isn't real? You're not inside his head.

You haven't lived his life.



Of course, if he runs eighteen train wrecks that all

happened in the same year and you know that he's been

living in the country and there were no trains, you can

assume that what he is running has some slight

questionability. But don't be sure of it to the extent

where you'll invalidate him. No,  get him off the subject

of train wrecks, that's all - just get him off the subject

of train wrecks. 



Female voice: quite a brilliant lecture.



Don't invalidate his data, that's all. He will suffer every

time his data is invalidated.



Now, you run this incident out of the preclear, you run

this incident where he just is bound and determined to run

this time that the car ran over him when he was four years

old. Father backed out of the garage and ran over him with

the car. And he's just determined to run this incident.

He's just not going to hear of anything else but he's got

to run this incident.



You see, this was a time when Father did something to him

and he wants to show you that he is justified in doing what

he did to Father or to fathers in general.



So he wants to run this incident. Well, let him run the

incident. Don't cause a big roar about it. After all,

probably a wheel passed over his leg and it was amputated -  

something mild, not like these big, early incidents that 

really fixed him up thetawise. I'm being facetious when I 

say run over his leg. That probably would be a slightly 

serious incident because he'd be without his leg and this 

would be a restimulator of it. And his chances of growing a 

leg in his present aberrated state are zillch. Now, I'm not 

saying that he could grow a leg if he were in any other kind 

of a state; not saying he couldn't either.



Anyway he wants to run this incident, so you start him

through the incident and you let him run the incident. And

he runs it out, and finally it gets up to very clear

reality and he's in beautiful shape about this incident, he

likes this incident, he thinks this incident is fine, And

he goes home and he talks to his mother on the telephone

who lives in Sioux Falls and happens to be at 1,2 on the

Tone Scale. And he says, "You know the time that Dad ran

over me? You know, you had a coat that was a green coat

with purple spots, and so forth. And I got all this data

back there - four - and I got a look inside the house and all

those pictures you had of angels -"



And Mother says, "You know, I didn't have any pictures of

angels then. They were acquired when you were eight."



And he says, "Yeah but I ran this incident and this old

Maxwell4 car was going bop-bop, crunch, bop-bop, cr - ,"



"Your father didn't buy a Maxwell car till 1921."



He completely overlooks the fact that Maxwell cars were not

made in 1921; they were discontinued earlier, I think. I

think the car by that time had become the Hat-in-the-Ring

car or the Rickenbacker or something. I've forgotten

exactly what it was, but so has Mama. And boy, has she

forgotten? She's much older than your preclear, and  she 

was not hurt during that sequence to amount to anything,

and her data on it is not particularly reliable.



But, she may not like the preclear to know: something in

her tells her that it's dangerous for this boy to know all

this stuff. So she'll just automatically start slapping him 

back, slapping him back, on everything he says.



"But the car came out of the garage and ran over me, and we 

had Dr. Watson."



And she says, "Well, lookit, there was a car that did run

over you, dear, but it didn't go all the way over you, and

your father was very sorry about it. And that happened when

you were nine. And your father was very sorry about it, and

as a matter of fact, we made it up to you. We bought you a

new bicycle because of it. And the car didn't run over you,

hut you were so frightened you merely thought it did. And

so, ha-ha, we didn't commit any overt act against you. We

didn't commit any overt act against you. We didn't do this.

We didn't do thia We didn't do this." This is all she's

saying. "Get off the subject," she says. "Get off - hehheh - 

let's talk about something else. I mean this isn't valid." 

He comes back to you and you try to run him and you find out 

the sonic he had is gone. The visio he had is gone. His 

recalls now cease at the age of sixteen and he can't remember 

anything earlier. Great?



But the invalidation of a past life: If you run Effort

Processing indiscriminatehi on a preclear, you're going to

run him into a past life, I don't care who he is. If he's

the most materialistic science [scientist] on the face of

tile earth today, by giving him about three ordinary simple

routine efforts to run, I would wind him up in a past life.



There he would be in the crowd watching Benjamin Franklin

fly the kite or something. And he'd say, (sniff?) "Gee, I

guess I'm imagining a lot of this, and so forth."



And you say, "Well, now, Let's move back to the time you

fall off the horse," just assuming that he probably fell

off a horse in that life - horses being what they are.



So he goes - all of a sudden he says, "Oh, you know, I've

got a terrible headache!" And let's say, "Well, let's run

the incident and fall off the horse." So he falls off the

horse. And we find out that it's Derby day at Boston or

something and his name was Arman and his folks lived at 322

Back Bay and he's got all the dope and it's getting realer

and realer and realer,



It tells him something very interesting. It tells him

suddenly, "I haven't lived just one life."



The greatest horrible trick that you could pull on any

individual would convince him that he goes through all of

this just once and he never has another chance. That he's

born into the world and then he dies. And after he's dead,

he's dead forever. He'll never have it again.



Anything he loses then is terribly important to him;

anything which he fails in will be most horribly regretted.

You can keep an individual down at the bottom of the Tone

Scale by proving to him that he only takes one crack at it,

that he is - has no survival as a personal identity of any

kind whatsoever.



Now, I'm talking to you - demonstrable phenomena. I'm

talking to you about this, because it's very, very

important that you establish to your own great satisfaction

the existence of previous existences, before you

demonstrate to anyone that you don't want them to exist by

telling others they don't want to exist.



In other words, let's not further the control mechanism,

because there is no single proof of any kind at all that an

individual lives only once. There's no proof! And there is

ample, adequate phenomena and proof that an individual

lives on and on and on and on. We have phenomena; we have

proof; it shows up on any lie detector. Any policeman

operating any lie detector on any criminal could have asked

him this question, "Have you ever lived before?" and the

lie detector will say "Bop! Yes."



This phenomena has been lying there right on the surface.

It's something that people won't look at. Because they've

been taught otherwise. So, the individual runs this past

death, he runs this past life. All of a sudden he

recognizes something like a bolt of lightning. His recalls

are suddenly repaired all up and down the track and he

suddenly says, "You know, I've lived a lot of times!" Gee,

that means to him he'll live again. That means to him he'll

have another chance. It's  like  taking a condemned man out

of a cell and saying, "There's sunlight!"



Then he runs into some snide character around someplace

that's saying, "There ain't nobody ever lived before and

everybody knows." That's the best explanation, you see,

everybody knows nobody ever lived before. "And besides,

you're talking about the Roman Empire, and I'll have you know

that the Roman Empire failed in the year 221 and after that

waslrun exclusively by the Phoenicians, and besides that,

that society was superseded by the Egyptians and that's

where Masonry came from," and so on.



It doesn't matter how crazy the reasoning is, the fact that

somebody is hammering and pounding at this individual and

telling him, "you didn't! You didn't! You didn't!" They're

not saying, "That past life doesn't exist." They're saying

to him, "You belong in a deep, dark cell where you'll never

see any sunlight again - you'll never have another chance!"



And what they're saying to him is not just telling him he's

a liar or that he's wrong; they're saying to him, "You're

dead when you are dead and you're going to be dead forever.

And every little input of action that you're making into

this society is lost. There is no use for it. You're not

preparing anything for your own future. Go on back in that

dungeon and close that door and live in the dark, fellow"

That's what they're telling him. And the preclear's tone

will dive on an invalidation of a past life like a rocket

plane - kawham!



There's only one thing you should do then in regard to

these things: run them up to such a high level of reality

that they can't be invalidated. And you be very careful

about invalidating preclears when they start to run

something odd, peculiar and strange.



There was a poor kid back in Elizabeth that all the staff

was having a lot of firn with. And do you know what he was

running? He was running a past life on Mars. And do you

know, that's - of course, is impossible, except for one

thing: in very sane preclears lately I've been hitting a

life on Mars.



And they almost spun this kid in. He had a good chance of

going right out and coming right back to battery and being

in good shape, and they butchered him with this

invalidation.



What data were they operating from? No data except the

desire to be vicious! Of course, Facsimile One tells you

that you only live once. You're not supposed to know!



And the other one that's very important is, don't evaluate

your preclear's data for him. You're there to make him

think, not to do his thinking for him! And although it's

very sweet of you to say, "Well, oh, you - ;you remember the

incident you ran the other day?" And he says, "Well, yes, I

.. "



And you say, "You know, the one you ran with the car and

getting run overwhen you were four years of age, and you

remember the angels and so forh?" And he said, "Yeah,

Well, I wasn't thinking that "Well," you say, "you know

you thought it was very real." Data, data, data, data,

data, data, data - feed him. And watch him go down the Tone

Scale.



What you're doing is the same trick a lot of people have

done to him, is you're saying, "You can't think or evaluate

for yourself. I have to think and evaluate and remember for

you."



You go into a family where the husband, for instance, isn't

doing well, and you'll very often find his wife anxiously

answering all the questions you put to the husband - 

anxiously doing so - even though you're only talking socially 

with the husband. You say, "Well, I bet it was something like 

that in 1918." And he says, "Well, as a matter of fact ..."



And she says, "Well, as a matter of fact it - it was pretty

bad, wasn't it, dear?"



All of his opinions - she's feeding in opinions before he

can express one. And this fellow will be in bad shape!



You as an auditor can push the preclear down the Tone Scale

by telling the preclear what to think about what. You don't

care what he thinks about it.



And the easiest way not to evaluate for him is not to care

what he evaluates. Because if you're doing your job, he'll

evaluate automatically.



And your job is to put him into a situation where he can

evaluate, not to evaluate for him.



The two ways that you can ruin a preclear is to evaluate

for him, and on the other hand, invalidate him.



And the only thing which you can do wrong as an action is

to be a coward and fail to let him run on through the

incident because you're scared.



Those three things, then, in the attack on the preclear

assume enormous importance, and you should pay very great

attention to the Auditor's Code in general.



Thank you very much.



(end of lecture)



******************