From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Subject: FZ Bible STATE OF MAN TAPES 2/9 [x2]
Date: 04 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <ff3f28df2c90d987096c41c9d4cd6afb@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to <squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

STATE OF MAN (SMC) CONGRESS TAPES (1960) 2/9

**************************************************

Contents

SMC-1  1 Jan 60 Opening Lecture
SMC-2  1 Jan 60 Responsibility
SMC-3  1 Jan 60 Overts and Withholds
SMC-4  2 Jan 60 Why People Don't Like You
SMC-5  2 Jan 60 Marriage
SMC-6  2 Jan 60 Group Auditing Session
SMC-7  3 Jan 60 Zones of Control and Responsibility of Governments
SMC-8  3 Jan 60 Create and Confront
SMC-9  3 Jan 60 Your Case
 
We were able to check 4 of these against the old reels.


**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


SMC-2  1 Jan 60 Responsibility


Transcript of lecture by L. Ron Hubbard SMC-2  "State of
Man Congress" lectures.

RESPONSIBILITY

A lecture given on 1 January 1960

[Clearsound checked against the old reel. Omissions marked ">".]


It's a scroll!

Oh, wow! I better not read this. Well, I'll just post it
and won't read it. Okay?

Audience: No. Read it.

Says, "To L. Ron Hubbard: In behalf of the peoples of this
planet, as a token of our gratitude for your tremendous
gift to mankind and in celebration of the consolidation of
Scientology throughout the world this past year, we present
this globe to you the first day of January 1960. The
Central Organizations of the world." And they are listed.

That's very lovely and that's very unexpected and probably
completely undeserved.

The - you got a congress yet?

Audience: Yeah. Yes!

Well, hello.

Audience: Hello!

Hello.

Audience: Hello!

Okay.

Audience. Okay!

Thank you.

Audience: Thank you!

All right. Remember "Okay, Mama"?

Audience: Yes.

You know, I think they still talk about that in this hotel.
Well, that's a real nice globe. That's a real nice globe. 

> There's a display back there someplace of photographs but

I think this globe had better go in my Washington office,
don't you?

Audience: Yes.

All right.

> There's a display of photographs back there concerning some
> plant experiments and concerning some other things and of
> course I know there's some pro photographers around.  I see
> one down here, John McCormick, he's a pro and he'll
> probably sneer you know, but that's alright.  Is Wing Angel
> around here?  Where's Wing?  Oh, hiya Wing!  
> 
> Voice from Audience: Hiya Ron!
> 
> I was going to say as long as Wing's around, why, he'll
> defend my photography.

You really can't tell how glad I am to be here. I - you would
be utterly amazed how "no-havingness" the world at large
is. You'd just be fascinated. It's just one large area of
no-have. And in America we have so much, and there's so
much we can do with it - if we just had a government.

Oh well, we'll pass over that nostalgic moment. It is,
however, rather typical of free peoples that their
governments stink. It is.

But governments should be less, not more. And this is no
third dynamic speech I'm giving you here. Probably have to
be edited off because I mustn't and probably completely be
untrue to the United States Government. I have to support
them abroad. 

People come around and say, "Why did they do this?" You
know, "Urhurerha!"

Of course, my private opinion is, "Huh-huh, God knows!" And
I'd say, "Well, actually, the American people are one thing
and the American government is another. And the American
people are just as much at odds with their government as
you are with yours."

And they say, "Oh, they are? That explains it."

But we have a lot of fun - a lot of fun in America
wondering what we're going to do with our production and
things like that.

Well, this problem is not extant abroad. They wonder - wonder
how they're going to do without their production. And about
the only little cross you have to bear is the nonsense that
comes out of - of the State Department and so forth.

For instance, I wonder if you know that all the United
States Government down here (Christian Herter and the rest
of them) would have to do is just say to England and France
and Germany and the rest of them, "We want to sign a treaty
by which an American passport would be a free passport in
your country equivalent to citizenship, and an American
citizen would be bound, while in your country, by your
laws, and we want to sign this as a treaty. Here's the line."

And they'd say, "You do?" And that'd be that, see?

Sounds funny, but we're in exactly the same position the
Roman Empire was in a couple of thousand, twenty-five
hundred years ago. Who wouldn't be a citizen of Rome?

And although there were a few countries around saying,
"Well, maybe we'd better not have very many citizens of
Rome around because there won't be much left of us," they
never said it very loud, and they never really objected.
The Roman civilization covered Earth. This is the next
civilization after the Roman civilization to cover
anything. And we're the proprietors of that civilization.

They wonder down here - they wonder down here in the State
Department how they're going to handle international
relations. Well, that's the trouble - is they think there
are international relations. There aren't any international
relations, there's just Americanism.

Countries have even stopped defending their own cultures.
And it'd be a wonderful thing, be a wonderful thing, if an
American passport was as free as an American is made in any
country on Earth. But the American passport is not as free
simply because somebody in the State Department hasn't
found out yet.

We actually - we actually have Earth squared. There it sits.
It isn't mine, it's yours. And wherever we are and whatever
we're doing, it's too bad we're not backed up by the
government, too.

Well, enough of that. It's a bit of worry on my part and
the rest of yours part. There are several of you been
abroad recently. And it's quite interesting - quite an
interesting experience.

One of these days, why, you'll find Chicago everywhere. Or
New York. But not, please, California. That's my Iron
Curtain. No kidding, I'm very fond of California, and
someday I'm going to take it back. Actually, California is
doing marvelously.

> You know, I'd like to introduce just a few people here 
> very rapidly at this congress, just to show you it is a
> congress.  OK?  May I?  
> 
> Audience: Yes.
> 
> Alright.  Now, let me introduce first a couple of very brave 
> spirits who adventured down past the Sunday-Monday line, came 
> through the various domains of Neptune both south and north, 
> and who learned that you can work while standing on your head,
> and who actually didn't...  At this moment if it weren't
> for the Washington course going to be taught right after
> this congress, this pair would be lolling in deck chairs
> underneath the tropic sun, drifting homeward you know, mile
> by mile at seventeen knots or something like that.  Instead
> of that they came home by jet, phwew.
> 
> Now you know, if you don't travel by jet, you're fired. 
> People say they can't notice this speed but they're not me.
> I notice every mile of the five hundred and seventy-six
> miles an hour of it.  And the only thing I object to is the
> number of locations that get stacked up on one location. 
> Get the idea?  We left, we left London airport at eleven
> and got into New York at one.  Well, of course there's the
> time lapse there, but you never can quite figure this out. 
> 
> Well, I'd like to introduce this pair to you because
> they're here actually at some sacrifice, because as I say
> they could be underneath the tropic sun right this moment
> and they aren't, and that's Dick and Jan Halpern.  Stand
> up.  And I'd like to introduce John McCormick.  John's one
> of the good things of California, he really is, he really
> is.  And others, just so many people here that are good
> people and old time people.  Golly.  I have to introduce
> practically everybody in the congress.
> 
> Well, let me introduce Wing and Smokey Angel.  Let me
> introduce Jack and Melodie Horner here.  And Tom Maxwell. 
> And Mr. and Mrs. Bezazian.  There're just so many people to
> introduce to you that I'm just going to have to carry this
> out the rest of the congress.  Right now, let me introduce
> you to you.  Hello!  
> 
> Audience: Hello.

Okay, let's get down to something here that's very
important, shall we? Let's get down to some technology.
Now, I was going to save all this technology until day
after tomorrow. Do you think I ought to do it?

Audience: No.

Because if I saved it till day after tomorrow, you know
what would happen? I wouldn't have time to cover it. So if
give it to you right now all in - all in one package, it'll
take me the next two days to explain it. Okay?

Audience: Okay.

Would you like that nght now?

Audience: Yes.

Let's get this off to a high whine like the turbojet racing
cars you were telling me about thirty thousand years ago.
If anybody restimulates on that one, I'm sorry.

Ladies and gentlemen ... I had an old friend once back in
Athens who had a slave. He had a slave and this slave's
name was Diogenes. And the slave used to live in a barrel.
And there were very many stories concerning this slave but,
actually, he was trying to find, according to modern books,
an honest man. And he used to go around in daylight with a
lantern, looking for an honest man.

Now, because of the length of this microphone cord, I can't
pass amongst you.

I might find an honest man!

Certainly, in the last twenty-five hundred years there has
been no better opportunity or no group more eligible to
deliver one up than this particular group right here and
now. None more eligible - but on the other hand, I might pass
amongst you m vain. And that would be very sad. That would
be very sad.

But the next congress, I will be able to pass amongst you
and find nothing but honest men and women. Because actually
it's as much as your life's worth not to be honest.

If I ever run into this friend of mine, like I lately found
Karl Marx - if I - if I ever run into this friend of mine,
I'll tell him that Diogenes can come back and start looking
and maybe with some success. Because processing today is
fundamentally "fundamentalized" and basically "basicalized"
on just this single horrible fact: Them as ain't honest
won't get cleared, bud.

What do we mean by honesty? In this particular regard, we
mean somebody who has nothing to hide.

> Step Six phenomena went astray and Step Six phenomena was 
> simply that the pictures and masses of the bank got bigger 
> and bigger, and more and more vicious, and more and more 
> violent, and more and more crushing, and more and more, 
> until the person was finally practically rubbed out.  The 
> more you ran Step Six on some people, the worse they got.  
> And that little bug alerted us to what we have now.
> 
> I could do an awful dirty thing here.  I won't, though.  I
> could do something terrible.  I could ask for a show of
> hands of those people injured by Step Six, but I won't and
> don't raise your hand, you'd be telling on yourself.  Step
> Six phenomena isn't what increased the bank.  It wasn't
> running "keep facsimiles from going away and holding them
> still and making them more solid" that made the bank worse.
> It was that it was being run on somebody who was hiding
> something from the auditor he didn't dare tell the auditor
> about.  And that's the totality of it.

Every preclear you have lost - that is to say who didn't
finish his intensives or his processing and go through to
Clear - every preclear that you've had difficulty with, every
person who has ever blown a course, every person who has
ever blown a session, did so because they had something to
hide! And until those somethings are cleared up they will
never be Clear!

And if we were a religious organization going to town on
the sin of man, we would at this moment have it made! We
could convince with what violence, with what brimstone
that you sinners had better come clean, or hellfire and
damnation was going to be your lot! Man, we'd have it made.

Fortunately, we're not. So we can get something done. The
greatest overt act in the world is making other people
guilty of overt acts. That is the greatest overt act in
the world - about which, more later. So don't think at this
moment that I'm trying to make you guilty of overt acts!
The only thing I'm trying to do to you is get you Clear!
That's all I've got in mind. And that's why no resistance,
no attack for ten years has been able to get anywhere on
Dianetics and Scientology. Because basically, as far as the
subject is concerned, there was nothing to hide. That's
why we're still alive.

Oh, that doesn't say that I have told you all. That doesn't
say that there weren't times when I could have slipped you
some hot dope concerning me or conditions or organizational
wiggle-waggles in efforts to stay alive. And that doesn't
say that I myself am not guilty occasionlly of withholding
sumething from you, because I am guilty of withholding
quite a bit from you. But what I am withholding from you,
basically, is how rough it's been. I've tried to keep a
good public presence going. That's very often been very
rough. And that I've withheld. But as far as any
deep-seated, cross-purposed, tangled-up pitch no, we had
nothing to hide there.

For instance I could tell you a lot about me. I could tell
you a lot about my whole track. And some of it the
psychiatrists would at once start saying, "You see, we told
you. We told you so. He believes he's..." But I'm not
that one. I just set that one up. But as far as anything
withheld on the standpoint of our goals, as far as any
errors along that line that had to do with technology, as
far as data or anything else that could make anybody better
or Clear or make a better civilization, that's never been
withheld and it's never been an overt act. Therefore, We're
still here And that, incidentally is the only reason we're
still here. Because don t think with as much shotgunning as
there's been, that we would have survived it else.

Now, where a case left your session and told you that you
were a very bad auditor and told you that you shouldn't
have been doing it, there was enough truth in the niatter
for you to say, "Yes, he's right. I'm not as good an
auditor as I could be. My TR 4 stinks. So therefore, he is
justified in what he is saying, and therefore I will let
him go. I'll go back to school and learn how to do it a
little bit better or maybe I won't audit quite so much. Or
maybe I'll audit only easy cases or some other such thing,"
and there were lots of reasons - lots of reasons - reason,
reason, reason, reason, reason - why he should have blown
session.

But there was a reason that underlay all those other
reasons! And that underlying reason added up entirely and
completely to just one reason: As a person, he had
something to hide. Something he didn't dare let you know
about, he felt. Now, in that the preclear made a tremendous
mistake. Of all the peoples of Earth, of all the groups of
Earth, the one least likely to mess somebody up because
they found out something about him was a Dianeticist or
Scientologist. These people have my confidence and have had
my confidence for ten years. So therefore, it must have
been pretty bad if he couldn't even tell us about it. It
must have been pretty bad!

But a lot of these things are like the microbe seen through
a number of magnifying lenses. And the fellow said, "I did
so-and-so," and then he puts a big lens over the top of it
and he looks at it - "My Cod! That microbe looks big!"

And then he thinks, "Well, I actually shouldn't tell
anybody, really, about this, and somehow or another I will
get along without having done so, and that will be smart of
me because I will get by - I will get by anyway, and then
someday I will be Clear enough maybe to just as-is the
whole thing." Swsh-swsh.

And the moment that he did that, he took another great big
magnifying glass and put it on top of the stack. And now he
looked at this microbe, you know? Microbe is about that
long by now, you know? Has hair, teeth. And he said, "Well,
I'm a pretty bad fellow, but I'll fool them all. I'll fool
them all, and I'll get auditing in spite of this and I'll
go on and do good. And I will do enough good that it won't
matter!"

And of course, by that time you got this great big
magnifying glass put over here - clank. And the microbe 
was now much bigger than he was. Everywhere he looked, he
could see the microbe.

And one of these fine days you're going to get hold of that
fellow, you're going to take this little microbe hunter,
this E-Meter, you're going to put him on the cans and you'e
going to find that microbe that deseased his character.

He's going to say, "Oh, no, there's nothing there! No, no,
no, no, no. That's me breathing. I can very often control
the needle because I'rn really OT. And whenever you say
'women' and it dives, that's emotional response because I
like them!."

But you're not going to be fooled now You're going to reach
under all these magnifying glasses, you're going to pull
this thing out and dump it in the carbolic acid. And
that'll be the end of that man's case and he won't blow
sessions anymore. He'll just sit there and go right on
straight through till Clear. And that's the way it is.

The worst case has the most overts and withholds on all 
dynamics.

Let me call something to your attention. Only those cases
only those cases which did not advance at all, one iota,
never recovered anything, never got better in any way,
shape or form, harmed us. They were the people who chopped
us up. Why didn't they ever advance?

Look at the penalty these people were paying - to never get
out of the mud at all. Ah, what a pathetic thing. And no
Dianeticist or Scientologist would keep them in the mud.
And if we'd just known the value of this data that I'm
giving you - if we'd just known that this was at the bottom
of all of that, how easy it would have been. But as poor
old Joe Winter who went this route once said, "What
wonderful six-foot rearview mirrors we have with a little,
tiny peephole in front." 

But that's the history of the failed case, that's the
history of the failed student, and that's the history of
the enemy of Dianetics and Scientology.

He is our enemy because at any time in the last ten years
we had the ability to find out. And only those people are
against us who have something to hide. And this is not an
opinionated, political datum. It's cast-iron technology,
and for dramatic purposes, lends itself extremely well. But
it is simply coldblooded, advanced Scientology and nothing
else: That a case that has something to hide will run - find
some excuse to run - and then will sit and jabber, jabber,
jabber about how bad you are or we are. And that case
dramatizes what's wrong with the case, which is to say
overt acts against the various dynamics and will dramatize
it by saying there's something wrong with the auditor,
something wrong with Scientology, there's something wrong
with the way it is, there's something wrong... Well,
we're not perfect - but we're not trying to hide anything.

I took such a case, and because he had done something to
the organization, I didn't restrain myself from being
punitive. I have a well-grooved pattern on being punitive,
as lots of people have. You know, if people do something,
you're supposed to do something to them, you know? And it's
just my standpoint: The guy elects himself a victim, so I
say, "Well, all right. You're a victim."

But this fellow said this was bad and that was bad and the
other thing was bad in his immediate area and it was all
bad, bad, bad in his immediate area, and I said, "Then why
haven't you done something about it?"

And he says, "Well, I couldn't. Not in the position I was
in. I wasn't in such a position, I was in a junior
position. l wasn't - there wasn't anybody anyplace in the
whole organization, and I couldn't have said anything to
anybody."

I said, "Why haven't you done something about it?" 

He says, "But" - boom!

We haven't seen him since. Because any thetan has the
potentiality of doing anything to correct anything
anywhere! And he knows it. And what he does every day is
the sin of omission in that he doesn't straighten it all
out. And that, any case, no matter how honest, is living
with at this moment.

Now, if you can stand truth, you'll live. And if you can't
stand truth, you won't. And the dead ones of this planet
who are walking around zombielike in the dark shadows and
slippery alloys of the world can't stand truth.

And there's been an operation here on Earth which has
totally dedicated itself to making truth about yourself
totally unpalatable. Now, I won't mention any names and
never do mention this particular organization, but it's
specialty is 100 percent making you guilty of an overt act.
It tells you what sin is. Out of what black morass do they
tell you what sin is? If they'd used a handkerchief more
often, their own noses would be clean enough to tell you
what sin is.

One of these days we're going to have a collection fund.
We're going to get it together to buy handkerchiefs for
this organization so they can have clean enough noses to
tell the rest of us what overt acts are. Sound like a good
project?

Now, I don't mean to be necessarily hard upon your bank.
But the last few thousand, few hundred thousand, few
million, few billion years have been "kind to the bank"
period! And now I think we can afford a new slogan! Because
"be kind to the bank" hasn't worked. And "use the bank to
control" hasn't worked.

So our slogan here for a number of years has been a
mathematical formula which says "no bank = people." Works,
too. But how do you get no bank? How do you take the
Freudian unconscious, reconscious, deconscious,
munconscious and "unconscioulize" it? How do you pick the
id out of the lib? How do you get rid of the reactive mind?
How do you scotch and scrap off, wipe out and erase the
facsimiles and engrams which bedevil man's days and nights?
How do you do this?

Well, for ten years we've had a lot of technology. For ten
years we've been able to do a lot about it. I don't think
there's very much phenomena left in the bank that we
haven't discovered one way or the other, one time or
another. Phenomena that we haven't looked at is practically
nonextant. But what held it in place? Why did it continue
to stay there? Why, with all of our hard work, did we still
have people being uncleared? What reward was this for the
labors we invested as auditors to have somebody sitting
there still going, "Nyaaah." Well, why did it happen? Why
did it happen? Why did we still have aberrees when we
should have had Clears, hm?

Well, I'll tell you something. This phenomenon has been
running alongside of my auditing for a very long time, and
I've just been sufficiently unobservant to see it until
recently.

I was auditing a fellow in the - as you'll hear on one of the
tapes, if you ever hear the tapes of the Melbourne ACC. And
I'm auditing this fellow in an auditing demonstration. I
say, "All right. Tell me something that you could let me
know" - or "Think of something you could let me know. Now
think of something you could withhold from me."

And he answered this several times, very glibly. Po-pollok,
pocketa-pock, pocketa-pock, pocketa-pock. "Yes, I could
withhold that from you." All of a sudden he says, "You
know, withhold from you? You know that takes some doing!"

That was probably the only reason my auditing was faster
than other people's. Matter of altitude or something like
this that the person couldn't withhold things from me. That
was why - people got Clear and I never paid any attention 
to the fact. I just thought they told everybody these things,
you know?

But I used to get more Freudian traumas dumped in my lap
about their sexual irregularities when they were three. You
know, it's really amazing to have a fellow who devoted his
entire life to exploring sexual irregularities at the age
of three. I'm glad that he did because he gave us some dope
and left a tremendous area with some knowns in it instead
of totally unknown. But nevertheless, now that you look
back on it, it's awfully hard to be sexually irregular when
you're three. And I apologize to those younger thetans that
are in our midst here for making a crack about it.

But wherever a pc sits down and starts telling you all, 
all you have to do is listen. Well, that doesn't say
necessarily that they have to tell you everything they
ever did and all the crimes they've ever committed and all
the irregularities they have ever gone through in order to
get Clear. That doesn't tell you that, but it tells you
that those fellows that don't make very much progress in
auditing or that the auditing is slow on - it tells you that
those people are sitting on one that would blow the head
off the purity league very easily. And you realize, of
course, that more - most purity leagues are very hardened 
people.

Now, the person who makes no advance at all, who never gets
anyplace at all - oh, now, knck! I'll have to let you in on
this -amongst us Scientologists. I'll just have to let you
in on this: The person is guilty of a crime for which they
could be jailed or punished in this lifetime if it were
divulged.

Now, when you get into that level, you've had it. In other
words, he robbed a bank or something. But the crime is
serious, and the person could be arrested for it or
punished for it in present time if it were revealed! And
this fellow, by the commission of that crime, trapped
himself as far as auditmg was concerned, unless he
actually does straighten it out one way or the other and
get it cleared up because his case isn't going to move that
far until he does!

For ten years we've seen this phenomena and we wondered
what it was all about. We wondered why we couldn't audit
anything on this fellow. He just, you know, sat there, you
know. "Yes," he'd say, "yes."

And you'd say, "Double match terminal a couple of dogs
now." He would. "Yes," he'd say, "Yes."

End of session come along: "How do you feel?"

"Oh, I feel terrible."

"Thank you. That's it."

Why? Why? Why? Well, we already know the technology: He's
auditing across a present time problem. And it comes under
the heading of the technology which we already have, which
is a present time problem or an ARC break.

Now, he can't go into two-way communication with the
auditor so he never goes into session! He's never
in-session because he can't be in two-way communication.
And he can't take his attention off of what his attention
is fixedly on and put it on any other part of the bank
because he has a present time problem all the time, whether
he realizes it or not. He doesn't know it, he just kind of
"knows" it, you know?

And his attention is always fixedly on this thing. But it's
the one thing that he can't reveal which makes a total plug
to any auditing happening. And there it is, and it just
locks him up just as nice as though they'd thrown him in jail.

I can tell you something. It'd be better off to be in jail
than never have Scientology work. Wouldn't it? Because that
means you're going to be in jail from here on out. Locked
up in a ruddy head with no freedom and no power. That - I
tell you, that's a sentence, isn't it? Not even until death
do us part. But forever and ever and ever as long as ye
shall erg. That's how long. Fellow's passed sentence on
himself already.

But that doesn't give him any right to give the auditor the
bad time that he gives an auditor, does it? Hm? Because he
now blames the auditor for what he himself won't divulge,
and he says it's the auditor's fault.

Well, basically, technologically, it has been our
collective fault for not getting our cotton-picking fingers
deeper into his cotton-picking reactive bank with one of
these things.

Now, these things are now available - actually are
manufactured on every continent. Nice gimmick. And they'll
tell you what the score is. And they'll go for broke. And
there's things now - there's by the way a new booklet on
this, a new electrometer booklet - and I'm going to give 
you addenda to that booklet right here in this congress
concerning the functions of this here particular
gimmigahoogit with the electronic whizzlebubs.

There's a lot of things to know about this thing. And one
of them is that the person who has the greatest crimes has
the least responsibility on all dynamics and at first
registers the least on a meter. The meter only registers
those things he still has some slight responsibility for.
So there's ways and means of walking around a case on one
of these meters we didn't know about before. And the
greatest condemnation, you might say, of a case is that it
didn't react on a meter. Case didn't react very much on a
meter? Well, the auditor knows where to go from there.

Another thing is - I'll tell you more about it later - but
the needle is not as important as the motion of the tone
arm. The motion of the tone arm is a better detector than
the needle. Interesting, huh?

Now of course, this machine here - you young sprouts that
are in the audience will probably live in a civilization
where to get a job you'll have to be checked out on an
electrometer, and where they won't have unreasonable and
destructive revolutions for the excellent reason that most
of the criminals are missing out of the society.

> By the way, I get in some good licks unexpectedly once in a
> while.  I was riding with a fellow who was in charge of one
> of the largest mills in northern England on a jet plane and
> I was talking to him about this and that.  And as close as
> I could come to telling, making him understand about what I
> was doing is I was finding out about people.  And he could
> understand this.  And I asked him if he had any communists
> working for him in his company and organization and so
> forth.  "Oh," he says, "Oh yes.  A few, you know, shop
> stewards and things like that."  And I said, "Well, you
> having any trouble with any strikes or anything like that?"
> "Oh yes, yes, terrible trouble with strikes and so forth."
> 
> I said, "Well you know, I found out something very funny
> recently.  The communists always have criminal backgrounds.
> Every time we find a communist we find somebody with a
> criminal background."  And this fellow said, "What?"  And I
> said, "Yes," I said, "It just goes together," I said, "It's
> a funny thing we found lately.  I thought you might be
> interested."

Now look, there are a lot of people in the society (quote)
"doing good" or "trying to change the society" because they
themselves owe a debt to society which they are trying to
pay in an oblique way.

I'll tell you something very funny: that is simply a
compulsion that never gets anyplace. All of us owe a debt
to society as far as that goes. We owe our services on all
dynamics. But when we have to give them under compulsion,
they don't work very well. So this idea of "the fellow is
trying to do good because he has been so bad" generally
winds up with us all in the soup. The funny part of it is,
he'll do ten times as much good, a thousand times as much
good, if he himself doesn't have to do any good at all.
Quite remarkable.

So there's no reason for this mechanism beyond the fact
that certain individuals individuate and fall away in the
society, fall away from the dynamics to such a degree that
they become something else than human, become something
else that isn't alive, that's sort of a synthetic something
that crawls through life and tries to get along.

When you try to audit a person who is guilty of too many
overt acts, he makes no progress. When you audit a person
who has a few he had better not say, he makes slow progress
and is once in a while a little blowy, once in a while
tries to leave, once in a while tries to get out of school
or get out of a session. And we've long since known that
when we got somebody with hardly any up the line he'd tell
us those.

It s an old HGC phenomenon: The fellow comes in and he
says, "Sh, I urnm mmmm-rnmrnm-mmm ..." And he goes out
saying, "Wtsch! Tell anybody you want." Get the idea? I
mean he had a change.

Well we knew that, but the reverse was actually what we
were looking for. We were looking for the fellow who was
doing this, you see, to find the fellow who was causing any
trouble, to find the fellow who wasn't doing constructive
things, to find the fellow who wasn't getting the show on
the road. That was the destructive person.

You are looking here - and we will go into it much more
later - but you are looking here at something - something 
that has very far-reaching ramifications, something that goes
out across a great many future millennia. You're looking at
something here which has meaning.

It only takes one cognition on anybody's part to just go
for broke and make it true - a world without criminals, a
world of effective people. The only cognition you have
to - is it isn't necessary to have overt act-motivator
sequence as part of the game! The second you have a
subjective reality on that, you just drop the rest of it as
though it's hot chestnuts, just brrrr. As a matter of fact,
the overt act-motivator sequence game - "You're guilty,
we'll punish you. I'm guilty, you punish me. I'm a victim,
therefore you 've done so-and-so. You're a victim,
therefore I've done so-and-so" - this isn't even vaguely
necessary to any enjoyment of life or any game of any fun!

You just look it over, and you'll find out that all the
games you've enjoyed had nothing to do with the overt
act-motivator sequence. Very funny.

It's the overt act-motivator sequence which puts the end to
all games. Doing things to people and having to punish them
and be punished by them and all of this sort of thing is a
sort of a sordid, last-ditch activity which people hope
somebody will mistake for a game. But that's about as far
as they get with it. They really don't have a game at that
level. So it actually is antiquated. There's many things
you can do without going into that.

Now, if these statements of mine have upset anybody, I am
truly sorry - for their case.

For instance, there was a little giri who wasn't making
very much progress. She was a - she was a civilian from out
in town, she wasn't a Scientologist. And she wasn't making
very much progress, and I noticed her face was getting sort
of sunken and she was getting a little bit haggard under
auditing and was really going along with it all right, but
somehow or another wasn't quite getting much benefit from
auditing and so forth.

So I sat down at her desk the other day and I said, "You
know, girls do a lot of things in life. They think they're
all very reprehensible. Matter of fact, I wouldn't be a bit
surprised but what you don't think that you've done
something that if Doctor Hubbard heard about, he'd sack
you." I said, "Well, the funny part of it is," I said, "I
don't think you could do anything that bad. Next time
you're audited, why don't you tell your auditor all about 
it?"

So she did, and her case went zoom! It was very
reprehensible. Something on the second dynamic at the age
of eight. Pretty bad, you know? But she was sitting on a
big withhold.

Now, a person's overts and withholds on any or all dynamics
are the only reason their cases stay bogged! And it gets
back to the definition of Operating Thetan which is
"willing and knowing cause over matter, energy, space,
time, form and, of course, thought and postulates" -
Operating Thetan.

The horrible thing we have to face up to, if we're going to
get anyplace, is; We done it. And I'll talk to you later
about responsibility. We're actually not trying to hang
people left and right with this thing called responsibility.

But we are saying just this and I am telling you just this:
True recovery of one's beingness goes along with one's
realization that he has been the cause of any difficulty he
has ever had. And that's an awful tough bullet. That's so
tough that you probably won't make it for hundreds of hours
of auditing.

It's all very well for you to step up very happily you
know, and say, "Well, that's right. Ron says that. And
there's nothing to it, and I'll get down here in the
auditing chair, and I'll sit here. Ha! Now, what can I be
responsible for? I can be responsible for all the
difficulties I've ever had."

And the auditor says, "Well, all right. Well, just tell me
one you could be responsible for" "Well, I could be
responsible for... No, I couldn't be responsible for that
difficulty at school! That was her fault!" And there
derails that set of flatcars right off into the woods, see?

No, we got lots of them - lots of things we're not willing 
to take responsibility for, but it isn't responsibility we're
trying to hang people with. We've got lots of them.

And right away, glibly, we say, "Is that all it takes to be
Clear? Who'll listen to me? Who'll listen to me? Listen, I
 - I'm willing to take responsibility for everything. I
caused all of my own difficulties. Boy, I was" - boom! And
you collapse on that point.

Now, the point I'm trying to make is simply this: That the
state of Clear is the state of being admitted cause on all
dynamics. And you have been, but you haven't admitted it.
And that's the auditor's job; to get you to.

Thank you.

[End of tape.]



