   
   CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 16/16


CLASS VIII COURSE PACK

CONTENTS:

( Hand = Handwritten materials, transcribed into text files
for this posting)

Part 16

214. HCOB 14 SEP 71 RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS
215. HCOB 18 SEP 69 DIANETIC AUDITING AND OT III
216. HCOB  8 JUN 70 SECRET
217. Hand 20 APR 68 IMPROTANT NOTE SECT III
218. HCOB 20 OCT 70 CONFIDENTIAL EP'S
219. HCOB  4 JUL 79 HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs
220. HCOB 15 AUG 83 FLYING RUDS ON SOLO OT III AND ABOVE
221. HCOB 17 AUG 83 LIST OF LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERIALS ON OT III COURSE
222. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: OT Section III - List of Volcanos
223. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT TWO
224. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT ONE
225. HCOB  2 JAN 70 CONFIDENTIAL - AUDITING BY R3R
226. HCOB  3 JAN 70 SOLO &amp; R3R
227. HCOB 10 NOV 81 OT III AND OT III ATTEST
228. HCOPL 14 JAN 72 THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED
229. HCOB 12 OCT 69 r. 20 Sep 78 LDN OT III RB

CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 16/16



214. HCOB 14 SEP 71 RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 14 SEPTEMBER 1971

OT III Packs
Class VIII's
Adv. Case C/S

S E C R E T

SOLO C/S SERIES No. 7

RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS


As per HCOB 26 August 1969 &quot;OTIII Case Supervision&quot;, ruds
go out on BTS. In this respect the following scale based on
HCOB 23 August 1971 C/S Series No. 1 &quot;Auditors Rights&quot; is
of use to the Solo Auditor:

When the ruds go out on BTs during the session the Solo
auditor recognizes the following: 

BT critical = W/H from auditor.

BT antagonistic = BPC in session.

No TA = Problem.

BT sad = ARC Brealk

Soaring TA = Overrun or protest; (also more than one
BT being run in error or it's a Cluster.)

Auditor tired = No sleep or incomplete Inc 1's.

Auditor dope off = By-passed FN or not enough sleep

Auditor no interest = Out ruds on BTs.

A solo auditor who isn't sure what it is but runs into
trouble with a BT is smart to end off the session quickly,
write down the full observation and get it to the C/S.

The Solo auditor who knows what he is looking at as per the
above scale (and the C/S the C/ S would give), handles it
promptly,

BT critical = pull the W/H.

BT antagonistic = BPC = assess proper list (such as L1C)
and handle.

No TA = (or case gain) = Problem = locate the problem and handle.

BT sad = ARC Break = locate and handle, itsa earlier itsa.

Soaring TA = O/R or Protest (Also more than one BT being
run in error or it's a Cluster) = find which and handle. 
(Running more than the one intended comes from too WlDE an 
intention.)

Auditor tired = no sleep or incomplete Inc 1's = check
which it is and handle .

Auditor dope off = lack of sleep or BP FN = check on sleep
or rehab FN.

Auditor no interest = out ruds on BTs = put in ruds.


Flag A/Advance Course Supervisor
for
Training and Services Aide

for
L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH: BW: LR: mo
Copyright (c) 1971
By L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

215. HCOB 18 SEP 69 DIANETIC AUDITING AND OT III


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 18 SEPTEMBER 1969

OT III Pack
Class VIII

CONFIDENTIAL


DIANETIC AUDITING AND OT III


After a person has been on OT III for awhile and he is
audited by a Dianetic Auditor (who must be a Grade OT II
working on OT III or an OT III himself, unless you want to
wreck your Dianetic Auditors and break security), certain
phenomena develop: It will be found that emotions and
somatics etc., will assess as ever without difference on a
Health Form. There is no change in this.

However, in running, the chain may be found to consist of
incidents which are connected with OT III Solo auditing as
well as events.

Thetans which were not run due to interruptions of Solo
III, due to errors by the Solo auditor and incidents in
which the pc received BTs as well as impacts making
clusters may be encountered.

Such auditing can be apparently full of ARC Breaks but only
if the Dianetic auditor departs from the Auditors Code or
regular procedure.

The auditing situation may seem to demand changed commands
etc., but the only fallability can occur if the auditor
goes non-standard.

For Example:

The pc cognites he is not running his own incident but a
body thetan. This requires only TR 4 as it is only an
origin. Acknowledging the fact, the auditor simply goes on.

Evaluation by the Auditor can easily and dangerously occur.

For example, the pc finds he is relaying the auditing
commands to the BT. This would seem to indicate that the
auditor changed the wording of R3R to &quot;Have him move
________&quot; or some such alteration. To alter commands is
fatal. Soon the pc will find the BT is taking the auditing 
commands directly and and no change of command was needed.

The pc relaying BT comments back to the auditor is only a
TR 4 situation unless, of course, the command was wrong or
a clarification is requested. Even then the auditor does
not go non-standard. The primary Dianetic Auditor error in
running one BT on Inc 1 after another is to use ABCD
instead of 1, 2, 3, 4. The last BT blew. The new BT hasn't
got a date to move to if you just use ABCD. You do 1,2,3,4
on the next BT. You should realize he is a different pc.

Running a chain of one emotion or somatic you can get lots
of BTs who have a part of that chain. So if one goes down
the chain to Inc 1 and blows with an F/N, you may find
the same somatic or emotion on a new BT which will run as
in any R3R and again get down to an Inc 1.

Example: The Solo auditor has not audited for 6 months. He
gets a Dianetic session.

Assessed is &quot;A feeling of sadness.&quot; The Dianetic auditor
runs a chain consisting of :

1. An interrupted Solo session.

2. An overrun Inc 2.

3. An Inc 1 to blow and F/N.

Now the same item &quot;A feeling of sadness&quot; reads. A chain is
run consisting of 

1. An interrupted Solo session

2. Where the BT picked up the pc. Blow F/N.

Now the same item reads - &quot; feeling of sadness &quot;. A chain is run

1. An overrun on Inc 2 BT.

2. The cluster the BT was in. Blow F/N.

Once more &quot;a feeling of sadness&quot; reads. The chain is run

1. An ARC Brk from now getting audited.

2. Inc 2 overrun

3. Inc 1. Blow F/N.

The somatic is checked and the item does not read, only F/Ns.

So that's all there is to that. Reassess or add to the Health form.

__________________

This does not apply to Dianetic preclears. It applys ONLY
to Dianetic auditing done on Solo Auditors who are
incomplete or overdue or hungup on OT III.

__________________

One word of warning. BTs are sometimes not very bright and
perceive poorly. The Dianetic auditor whose TR 1 is
adequate to a regular Dianetic pc but inadequate to
auditing a solo auditor's BTs on a via can cause a lot of
ARC Brk, and upset. The BT misses or doesn't hear some of
the commands and gets confused if the Dianetic auditor has
a too quiet or poorly pronounced TR 1.

In auditing a former Solo Auditor on Dianetic auditing, the
Dianetic Auditor's TR 1 must be clearly hearable and
carefully said.

Also, as above, it is easy to mess up on TR 4 and evaluate
for the solo-auditor-now-pc &quot;clearing it up by telling him
what reads on the meter&quot; etc.

__________________

OT III pre OTs got a reputation of being hard to run on
Dianetics early in Dianetic re-development.

Only five reasons exist for this:

1. A person that high on OT grades audits fast and a comm
laggy Dianetic auditor can drive him up the wall.

2. Too quiet or too blurred TR 1.

3. A tendency to evaluate instead of using TR 4.

4. The numerousness of BT chains on the same item (The BTs
being separated now) making several chains of the same item
which if not all run separately leave the pc ARC Broken
with the by-passed charge of unrun BTs.

5. The OT II who is still an OT III and has been on it
awhile probably himself has no pictures and all the
pictures he has are BT pictures.

The lower grade pc (before clear) reacts as a composite
being all on one chain, so to speak. He is separared into
himself and individual BTs and clusters of them when he
gets to OT II and so &quot;audits differently&quot;. He easily
misowns the pictures, thinking they are his. And the big
Blowdowns you get on such a pc's item indicates several BTs
have it in common.

If a lower grade pc ever got separated out like this, it
could be that &quot;he&quot; has several chains of the same item,
meaning he has separated BTs. If the Class VIII sees a
lower grade pc whose &quot;illness won't recover&quot; he need only
have the same items checked that have already been run on
the pc and if one gives a BD, get it run again or again and
again.

But this means this pc was already-chopped up in sessions
in some way so that, unknown to the pc (and you don't
inform him or her) other BTs than that one run had the same
somatic or emotion and only one was run on it. You just
leave all items already run on the list and run them again
if they read again. If really flat the item briefly F/Ns
but you disregard the F/N while assessing in this case. The
phenomenon is rare that a lower grade pc has to run more
than one chain on the same item.

A Solo III, however, will be found to have the same Item on
more than one BT in many cases.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH:rs
Copyright (c) 1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

216. HCOB  8 JUN 70 SECRET


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstecd, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JUNE, 1970

Issue II

Class VIIIs
OT IlI
Class VIII Checksheet 

S E C R E T

The reason for low TA is unflat OTIII phenomena.

If a person has had a low TA in lower grades (see HCOB 8
June, 70, Issue 1) the keynote is take it very easy as
auditor and C/S. This applies also to any auditing given on
upper OT Levels.

That a Pc's TA goes below 2.0 is a certain indicator of
unflat OT III. He's still got some.

When a person cannot handle OT III he is too much at effect. 
He cannot project his intention. And so can't run OT III.

The new OT I and OT II, particularly OT II, are designed to
increase a pc's ability to project his intention to others.
If he can't, they overwhelm him and you get low TA or &quot;none
on III&quot;. Harsh, overbearing auditing or life incidents have
to occur, apparently to drive the TA down.

Overts, disagreements expressed as obsessive agreement and
other lower lovel matters are at the bottom of this in any
being.

But any &quot;case of low TA&quot; I have ever found has been:

(1) Overwhelmed in life;

(2) Unable to project intention;

(3) Physically inactive;

(4) Loaded with BTs;

(5) Tends to go out of valence easily .

In all this (4) is the important point.

The cure is given in HCOB 8 June, 70, Issue 1, and the only
thing that this HCO B, Issue II, adds is that it IS (4) above.

Endless OT III and Low TA are alike - inability to project
intention, pc at effect.

Remedy by lightly causing pc to come to cause, to be able
to project his intention and thus flatten OTIII.

That will complete and finish off low TA.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH: dz 
Copyright (c) 1970 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

217. Hand 20 APR 68 IMPROTANT NOTE SECT III


(HANDWRITTEN) 

Include in all original III Packets.

20 Apr 68

IMPROTANT NOTE SECT III

III Completion

It does not matter whether or not you ran Incident 1 and 2
on self.  

The End Phenomena of III is getting rid of all body thetans.  
This does not necessarily include self.  

If you overrun Ill it will be by trying to get rid of more body 
thetans than there were or by then, having gotten rid of the others, 
starting In on self.  

[in the handwritten original, &quot;getting&quot; in the above paragraph
is crossed out and replaced by &quot;having gotten&quot;] 

So III is COMPLETE  for purposes of overrun as above. 

[complete is underlined rather than capitalized in the handwritten]

If you have not done Incident 1 and 2 on self when above is
achieved, attest completion and then do 1 and 2 on self.

[handwritten has the LRH initial (big H with a bit of an L blended
into it) at the bottom]


**************

218. HCOB 20 OCT 70 CONFIDENTIAL EP'S


HUBBARD COMMUNICATION OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1970

OT III
OT IV


CONFIDENTIAL EP'S


No BTs left = OT III

Exterior = OT IV

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH: rr
Copyright (c) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

219. HCOB  4 JUL 79 HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 4 JULY 1979

Limited Distribution
NED for OTs Auditors
AO Review Auditors,
OT III
ACS Checksheet
Class XII

C O N F I D E N T I A L


HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs


When you get a read on a correction list on a Pre-OT who is
on OT III or above, you should find out from what area it
is reading. i.e. find the position in relation to the body,
of the BT or cluster on whom that correction list question
read.

Otherwise, the reading correction list line gets assigned
to all areas, when it only applied to one. This creates BPC
as it gives the rest a wrong item or wrong indication, and
it makes the reading question appear to be a generality,
when in fact it only applied to one BT or cluster.

By finding the BT or cluster that the read applied to, the
auditor then clears the read on that BT or cluster. And
then takes any additional steps to get it to blow and blow it.

The above does not apply to cases below OT III and must
never be mentioned to such a case.

There is a tendency of an auditor trained on general
correctlon lists to simply clear the read without finding
where it is coming from and as this omission can jam up a
case who is on OT III or on NOTs, such auditors when doing
NOTs or actions on Pre-OTs OT III or above must learn to
handle correction lists in this way. It can mean the
difference between failure and success.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH: DM: kjm
Copyright  1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

220. HCOB 15 AUG 83 FLYING RUDS ON SOLO OT III AND ABOVE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 15 AUGUST 1983

AOs
OT Review
Auditors
C/Ses 
Solo OT III Course and above

CONFIDENTIAL


FLYING RUDS ON SOLO OT III AND ABOVE


( Ref:HCOB 16 Aug 83 CONFIDENTIAL SOLO C/S Series No. 7 
RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS HCOB 11 Aug 78 RUDIMENTS, DEFINITIONS 
AND PATTER )

Flying rudiments at OT III and above is a piece of tech a
Solo Auditor on III must know and be able to use. At this
level, when a rudiment is out the Pre OT must be able to
determine whose out - rudiment it is - his own, a BT's or
that of a cluster.

MISOWNERSHIP

Scientology axiom 29: &quot;In order to cause an As-is-ness
to persist, one must assign other authorship to the
creation than his own. Otherwise his view of it would cause
it's vanishment.&quot;

This Axiom is especially relevant to auditing at the level
of OT III and above because at this level the Pre OT is
handling other being than himself ( BTs and Clusters). 
Axiom 29 tells us that it is necessary to establish
correct ownership of charge in order to get an As-is-ness 
of the charge.

Furthermore, incorrectly assigning charge to the wrong
being can cause by-passed charge ( BPC ) as it is now misowned.

Hence the instruction in the OT III materials that one must
use a narrow attention span so as not to restimulate or
confuse other BTs with the one being audited.

Finding charge without establishing whose charge it is, and
fully handling the charge for that being, can result in a
generality - the idea that the charge belongs to all -
when it only belongs to one being. This can cause a wrong
indication to the others to whom it does not belong.

Finding more than one charge without establishing whose
charge it is, and fully handling that being, can result in
a generality - the idea that the charge found belongs to
all - when it only belongs to one being. This can cause an
ARC Break or bad reaction as it acts as a wrong indication
to the others to whom the charge does not belong. By
correctly establishing the ownership of charge, and
handling the correct charge on the being to whom it
belongs, you get an As-is-ness of the charge.


HOW TO FLY THE RUDS

The rudiments questions which contain the word &quot;you&quot; (i.e.
&quot;Do you have an ARC Break?&quot;) are for use on lower level
Pcs, but not at OT III or above. When the word &quot;you&quot; is
used in a rudiments question on a Pre OT who is OT III or
above, it is evaluative. It says whose charge it is.

The correct wording of rudiments questions for use by the
Solo Auditor on OT III or above is:

&quot; Is there an ARC Break ?&quot;

&quot; Is there a present time problem ?&quot;

&quot; Is there a withhold ?&quot;

&quot; Is there an overt ?&quot;

and when full ruds are being flown:

&quot; Is there an invalidation ?&quot;

&quot; Is there an evaluation ?&quot;

By using &quot;Is there an/a ________ ?&quot; you are not evaluating
whose charge it is.

Then the Solo Auditor can establish whose charge it is by asking:

&quot; Is ( charge found ) mine? A BT's ? A Cluster's ? and
handle which of these read.

Note: Sometimes you may find that a charge can belong to
and read on more than one of the above, in which case you
would handle both reads, one at a time. It is also possible
that an ARC Break, for example, could be shared by all
present, and that it is the Pre OT's out rud and also a
BT's or Cluster's. The question used in this case would be
&quot; Is it also ( mine ) ? ( a BT's ) ? ( a cluster's ) ?&quot;.

When one rudiment has been fully handled, using the steps
above, the Solo Auditor continues on down the rudiments
questions to the next reading rudiment and handles it as above.

EXCEPTION

Sometimes the rudiment will run and F/N and blow just on
one of the first rudiment questions alone ( such as, &quot; Is
there an ARC Break ?&quot; or &quot; Is there a present time problem?&quot;, 
etc. ), and without differentiating whose charge it is.

It is possible that the Solo Auditor may not be able to
determine whose it is. This is how rudiments run all the
time on lower level cases. It just runs generally as the
rudiment, without establishing whose it is. The trouble one
can get into, however, is misownership, whereby you are
running a charge that belongs to a BT as if it were your
own ( the Pre OT's ) charge. Or the charge of one BT is
misowned as belonging to some other BT or Cluster.

When misownership of charge occurs, it won't run or as-is
or blow, you can't F/N it, and it will start turning on
more mass or solidity. If you get into this sort of
situation, narrow enough attention span, sort out whose it
is and handle accordingly.

But if when flying a rudiment, or other charge found such
as a reading line on a prepared list, it just runs and
blows, realize you've had a lucky break. Don't interrupt
this to try to find out whose it is or try to take it up
again after it has blown.

This is obvious enough when it happens because as soon as
you get onto the reading rudiment or reading line the
charge starts coming off and the whole thing F/Ns and blows.

This is a special condition and if it doesn't occur you
always proceed according to the steps given under &quot;How To
Fly The Ruds&quot;.

RULE

Unless you get a discharge and blow of the rudiment as
described under &quot;Exception&quot; above, it is essential to find
out if any charge found belongs really to the Pre OT
himself or to a BT or a Cluster when the charge is found.

Don't fly all the ruds, for example, and then ask: &quot; Are
all these .... ?&quot; as that would generalize it.

The rule is : ON RUDS, OR ON A PREPARED LIST, OR WHEN FINDING A
CHARGE ON A CASE, AT ONCE CHECK IF THAT CHARGE BELONGS TO A BT
OR CLUSTER, and if so, find where that BT or Cluster is and
limit your attention to that specific area when F/Ning the
read. And then take any additional steps to blow that BT or
Cluster. And blow it.

These rules for the Solo Auditor on OT III or above apply
when putting ruds in at the start session and apply as well
to ruds going out during the session. ( Ref: HCOB 16 Aug
83, CONFIDENTIAL, SOLO C/S Series No. 7, RUDS GOING OUT ON
BTS. )

The handling in the later case is the same.

CAUTION

The ruds question : &quot; Is there a/an .... ?&quot; can be asked of
any case, but the remainder of the data in this HCOB does
not apply to cases below OT III and must never be mentioned
to such a case.

SUMMARY

Before you begin solo auditing on OT III get this procedure
drilled until you can do it smoothly and precisely.

With the principle of misownership and As-is-ness
understood and the procedure well drilled, flying ruds at
OT III and above is a piece of cake.

Good auditing!

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH: sk  
Copyright  1983 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

221. HCOB 17 AUG 83 LIST OF LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERIALS ON OT III COURSE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 17 AUGUST 1983

AOs, FSO ONLY
Solo OT III C/Ses
Solo OT III Course Supervisors
Solo OT III Course

CONFIDENTIAL


LIST OF LRH HANDWRITTEN

MATERIALS ON OT III COURSE


The following is a list of all LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERALS
which should be in all OT III Course packs.

OT III students are to check their packs against this list
and ensure all of these handwritten materials are there and
have been studied before attesting to completion of either
the Study Section or the Auditing Section of the Course.

PART TWO: STUDY OF OT III DATA

1. DATA, 3 pages LRH handwriting.

2. 2nd NOTE, INCIDENT II, 28 Oct 68, 5 pages LRH handwriting.

3. 1st NOTE, INCIDENT I, 28 Oct 68, 1 page LRH handwriting.

4. INSTRUCTIONS ( revised 12 Aug 1969 ), 4 pages LRH Handwriting.

5. SECTION III OT, ADDITIONAL SHEET, NOTES ON RUNNING, 2 pages
LRH handwriting.

6. 3rd NOTE, RUNNING INCIDENT II, 28 Oct 68, 2 pages LRH
handwriting.

7. IMPORTANT NOTE SECTION III, 20 April 69, 1 page LRH handwriting.


PART THREE: AUDITING SECTION

1. OT III SECTION, LIST OF VOLCANOES, 1 page LRH handwriting.

2. INCIDENT TWO, 1 page LRH handwriting.

3. INCIDENT ONE, 1 page LRH handwriting.

The above-listed materials are modified only by the data
contained in HCOB 2 Nov 78R, Rev. 10.12.78, CONFIDENTIAL, 
URGENT, IMPORTANT, DIANETICS DELETED FROM OT III MATERIALS, and 
HCOB 2 Oct 68R, Rev., 16 Aug 83, CONFIDENTIAL, OT III.

ALL OT III Course materials must be returned to the
Advanced Courses Admin at the completion of the OT III Course.

Upon return of these materials, the Advanced Courses Admin
must check the pack contents against the OT III Course
Checksheet to ensure all materials ( LRH handwritten
materials, HCOBs and HCO PLs ) have been returned.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH: pm: sk
Copyright  1983
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

222. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: OT Section III - List of Volcanos


[Handwritten]

OT Section III

List of Volcanos

There were 2 zones of assembly after the thetan was
implanted.  Thetans of volcanos in Asia and the Pacific were
taken to Hawaii.  Thetans of Atlantic areas were taken to Las
Palmas.

Asia and Pacific
North Japan            Mt. Shasta
South Japan            San Gorgornio
Krakajawia             Indonesia
Mount Washington       Philippines 
   (Alaska) 
Mount Ranier           Himalayas
Mount Hood             (Hawaii)
Andes

Atlantic
Tangier                (Las Palmas)
St. Helena             Canada
Kolomonjero (Kenya)

(Spelling not guaranteed)
(List may be incomplete)


**************

223. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT TWO


[Handwritten Platen]

INCIDENT TWO

75,000,000 years ago on this planet.  Sometimes capture was
on another planet and explosion on this planet, then called
Teegeeack. 

Locate area of explosion.  PICTURES of explosion follow.  
Get original explosion.  
Effort to stop usually present.

H-BOMB DROPPED ON VOLCNO
EXPLOSION
TERRIFIC WINDS
THETAN CARRIED OVER PEAK
ELECTRONIC RIBBON CAME UP
HE STUCK TO IT
IT WAS THEN PULLED DOWN AND HE WAS (AS PART OF A GROUP)
IMPLANTED WITH R6
PICTURE OF PILOT SAYING HE IS MOCKING IT UP

(R6 materials follow, then DAYS of pictures of God, Devil, etc.)

(Thetan usually cognites on pilot or before (or on first
incident) and leaves.)


**************

224. Hand ?? ??? ?? Platen: INCIDENT ONE


[Handwritten platen]

INCIDENT ONE

Occurs at START of track (4 quadrillion years ago).

LOUD SNAP
WAVES OF LIGHT
CHARIOT COMES OUT, TURNS RIGHT AND LEFT
CHERUB COMES OUT
BLOWS HORN, COMES CLOSE
SHATTERING SERIES OF SNAPS
CHERUB FADES BACK (RETREATS)
BLACKNESS DUMPED ON THETAN
Effort to stop must be gotten off (sometimes to hurry).
Run as an engram.


**************

225. HCOB  2 JAN 70 CONFIDENTIAL - AUDITING BY R3R


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 2 JANUARY 1970

Class VIII
OT III
Study Pack


CONFIDENTIAL

AUDITING BY R3R


Elsewhere earlier HCOBs forbade Inc II and Inc I to be run
when encountered by a Dianetic auditor on an OT III student.

This restriction is lifted. Experience shows they must be
run if encountered by a Dianetic Auditor who must be OT III.


L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH; rs
Copyright (c) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

226. HCOB  3 JAN 70 SOLO &amp; R3R


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY 1970

Issue II

AOs
Class VIIIs
OT III Study Pack 
R6EW Study Pack

CONFIDENTIAL

SOLO &amp; R3R

DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RUN R3R as a SOLO Action.

Tests show that while one occasionally can &quot;get away with
it&quot; the practice can be dangerous.

Solo Auditing is addressed to specific areas of the mind as
given in the auditing materials of R6EW and upwards as issued.

One can run Rudiments on oneself successfully with &quot;Itsa
earlier Itsa&quot; meaning finding an earlier similar ARC Brk etc.

But when one tries to run engrams by R3R on Solo one can
run into trouble.

When engrams not related to Auditing materials get in one's
way on Solo OBTAIN A DIANETICS SESSION from the org.

It is also very bad in Solo to wander around the bank
looking over various ideas instead of auditing the materials.

No org can be responsible for somatics and case upsets
occurring because one has departed from the exact regimen
given in the materials for Solo Auditing. Get a Review or a
Dianetic session from a Dianetic auditor who is OT III or
above.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH:rs
Copyright (c) 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


**************

227. HCOB 10 NOV 81 OT III AND OT III ATTEST


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 10 NOVEMBER 1981

LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
OT III &amp; above ONLY
AO C/Ses
AO Solo C/Ses
NOTs C/Ses
AO Review Auditors

C O N F I D E N T I A L

OT III AND OT III ATTEST

This issue changes the current handling of OT III and OT
II: attests and the next step after OT III. We want to end
off &quot;endless III's&quot;. Starting now, AO C/Ses are to handle
PreOTs on OT III as follows.

Let the person audit on OT III as long as he wishes. But at
the first slackening or abandonment or EP or if he is just
going on and on into &quot;endless III&quot;, look for a nice win and
tell him that's it and shunt him over to Audited NOTs.

An AO Review may be necessary before sending the person to
attest. On an &quot;endless III&quot; or some of these people who
have been incomplete on OT III or who have been on and off
OT III for a long time, a Review would be necessary. The
Review could be as short as an LDN OT III and Rehab their
best win on OT III or as long as a C/S 53 to F/Ning list
followed by an LDN OT III and then Rehab their best win on
OT III. On some you might only need to find a nice win they
had on OT III and indlcate that that was it, or get it
rehabbed in session (this would mainly apply to persons
currently on OT III).

Some of this termination of III would depend on auditor
availability for Audited NOTs, but if this is a situation
the solution is to train up more NOTs auditors.

The whole intention here is to take PreOTs who have
&quot;completed&quot; OT III per the above qualification and shunt
them over to Audited NOTs.

Let's start maklng OTs in VOLUME.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH: DM: kjm
Copyright ( c ) 1981
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

228. HCOPL 14 JAN 72 THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 JANUARY 1972

ISSUE I

AO's
OT III Students
For use in Advance Courses
Section III and above

C O N F I D E N T I A L

THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED

(Revises HCO PL 1 May, 1968 &quot;Green Green Form&quot;)

This form is called a &quot;Green Green Form&quot; because it can be
done over and over.

It is not a Review form. It is an auditing form done on or
by the student.

The stable datum of awareness and reality is &quot;Reality
increase is proportional to the amount of charge taken off
the case.&quot;

NAME:___________________DATE:________________TIME: _________

Name of Auditor (if audited by another)	______________________ 

One uses these words to see if the subject of the word is hot. 
Questions can be made up around the word then. Usually one realizes 
what it is.

F/N each read by finding an earlier similar incident if it
doesn't F/N in the first place.

Do not use to get the TA down.

1. ENVIRONMENT _______________________________________________

   ___________________________________________________________


2. ARC Break Find any ARC Breaks.

Run them: (a) Date ___________________

(b) Identify what it was ________________________________

(c) Find if it was a break in:

i. Affinity ____________________

ii. Reality ____________________

iii. Communication ______________

iv. Understanding _______________

v. Incomplete action cycle ________

vi. Overrun of an action __________


3. Ignored originations _____________________________________

   __________________________________________________________


4. Missed withold ___________________________________________

   __________________________________________________________


Who ________________When ________________How _____________


5. Motivator ________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


6. Overt ____________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


7. Present time problem _____________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


8. Problem __________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


9. Evaluation _______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


10. Invalidation ____________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


11. False meter read ________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


12. Thetan (BT) overrun _____________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


13. Self overrun ____________________________________________


14. Grade unflat - Whose?____________________________________

15. Cluster _________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


16. Switched Thetans (BTs) __________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


17. Out of valence __________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


18. Wrong date ______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


19. Wrong item ______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


20. Assertion _______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


21. Suppress ________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


22. Invalidate ______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


23. Improperly Audited ______________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


24. Quit ____________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


25. Didn't leave ____________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


26. Left ____________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


27. Came back _______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


28. New one _________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


29. Nervous _________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


30. Not you _________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


31. Abused __________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


32. Not-ised ________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


33. Suppressed out of existence _____________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


34. Thinks he's you _________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


35. You think you're another ________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


36. R3R Incomplete __________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


37. Run too many times ______________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


38. Protesting ______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


39. Helping _________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


40. Dead ____________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


41. Animal __________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


42. Bird ____________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


43 Insect ___________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


44. Putting them there to run _______________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


45. Still more left _________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


46. Trying not to be ________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


47. Stopped _________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


48. Getting too many restimulated ___________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


49. An earlier Inc 1. _______________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


50. (A.) An earlier Inc. 2 __________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


50. (B) Earlier mutual cluster-forming incident. ____________

  ___________________________________________________________


51. Too late on the track ___________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


52. Needs dating ____________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


53. Needs locating __________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


54. Part done then abandoned ________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


55. Too many incomplete cycles ______________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


56. Misunderstood word ______________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


57. Pretending ______________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


58. Lying ___________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


59. Suppressed hate _________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


60. Love ____________________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


61. Promised never to leave _________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


62. Something else wrong ____________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


63. It was all ok ___________________________________________

  ___________________________________________________________


Time ___________  TA ___________

Compiled from LRH writings
by Advance Courses Supervisor

by L. RON HUBBARD 
FOUNDER

LRH: PS:ne:fmg
Copyright (c) 1972 for
L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 

**************

229. HCOB 12 OCT 69 r. 20 Sep 78 LDN OT III RB


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 12 OCTOBER 1969RB
REVISED 25 AUGUST 1975
RE-REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978

Class IV, OT III Auditors
AO Review Auditors 
Class X-XII 
AO C/Ses 

(Revised 25 August 1975 and renumbered to delete 
Question 21 which was not written by me.)

(Re-revised 20 September 1978 and renumbered to delete any
Dianetic handling - as Dianetics, R3R, or R3RA is forbidden
on any Clear or above.)

(Revisions not in script.)

CONFIDENTIAL 

SECRET


LDN OT III RB


This list is for use on a pc who is OT III or above.

When an impasse occurs or the pc gets upset, the auditor
(who must be an OT III or above) assesses this list and
works out from what is found to read, what has gone wrong.

DO NOT RUN ANY R3R, R3RA OR ANY DIANETICS

LlC can be used on a BT.

L7 can be used on a BT.

GRADES

You can also run Grades O-IV on a BT.

OUT INT

A BT can be having trouble with Out Int, requiring the End
of Endless Int Repair RECALL process (but no R3R).

EARLIER INC I, EARLIER UNIVERSE

The most common difficulty you get into with a BT that
doesn't blow is there was an earlier Inc I , some have
several earlier Inc I's, and when you get down to the first
Inc I you're liable to jump from one BT to another, if you
keep asking for an earlier.

And if earlier Inc I doesn't work, then it's &quot;earlier
universe?&quot; - the BT recognizes there was an earlier
universe - the BT will spot this and blow.

(Caution: There is an implant which miscounts the number of
earlier universes, making it seem there were far more than
there were.)


LDN OT III RB

PreOT's Name_________________ Auditor_____________________

Date ________________


1. WAS THERE AN EARLIER INC I? _________

(Some BTs have several earlier Inc I's, the
earliest for that BT will run through and blow.)


2. WAS THERE AN EARLIER UNIVERSE? _________

(Get BT to recognize it and it will blow.)


3. JUMPED FROM ONE BT TO ANOTHER BT? _________

(Indicate and handle each BT restimulated.
Usually happens when auditor asks for an
&quot;earlier&quot; when there was none, or when
overrun past an erasure.)


4. IS THIS BEING MOCKED UP AGAIN SO IT CAN BE RUN? _________

(Indicate, if no F/N, D/L when it was mocked up.)


5. ONE INDIVIDUAL WHO THINKS HE IS A CLUSTER? _________

(Handle as an individual.)


6. A CLUSTER WHO THINKS IT IS AN INDIVIDUAL? _________

(Handle as a cluster, D/L, Inc II, Inc I.) 


7. THE DATE WAS ACTUALLY FROM A DATE GIVEN IN AN IMPLANT? _________

(Indicate. Find the actual date to blow. Locate to blow.)


8. WRONG DATE FOR INCIDENT? _________

(Correct the date to blow. Locate to blow.)


9. NO DATE WAS FOUND FOR INCIDENT? _________

(Date to blow. Locate to blow.)


10. WRONG LOCATION WAS GIVEN FOR INCIDENT? _________

Correct the location to blow, handle individuals.)


11. NO LOCATION WAS FOUND FOR INCIDENT? _________

(Locate the incident to blow, handle individuals.)


12. INCIDENT Is GOT INTO RESTIMULATION? _________

(Handle the Inc Is.)


13. EARLIER BEGINNING UNDETECTED? _________

(Find the correct beginning and it will blow.)


14. BYPASSED BASIC ON A CHAIN? _________

(Indicate, if no F/N, D/L.)


15. STIRRED UP INCIDENTS EARLIER THAN BASIC? _________

(Indicate.)


16. MORE THAN ONE CLUSTER IN A CLUSTER? _________

(Handle as a cumulative cluster.)


17. SOMEBODY COPYING WHAT WAS JUST ERASED? _________

(Indicate, if no blow, find out who was copying.)


18. RANDOM PICTURES COMING IN INDICATING A CLUSTER?

(D/L the cluster. Inc II, Inc Is.) _________


19. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY AND DATE A CLUSTER-MAKING INCIDENT? _________

(Identify the incident and handle as a cluster.)


20. JUMPED FROM ONE CHAIN TO ANOTHER? _________

(Indicate. Handle individual BTs.)


21. JUMPED FROM ONE BT TO ANOTHER? _________

(Indicate. Handle both BTs.)


22. ANOTHER BT RESTIMULATED? _________

(Handle the BT.)


23. FALSE TRACK THAT WAS REALLY PART OF AN IMPLANT?

(Indicate, if necessary D/L the implant.) _________


24. BASIC KEEPS REAPPEARING BECAUSE IT IS A CLUSTER? _________

(Handle as a cluster by D/L.)


25. AN EARLIER ERROR MADE? _________

(Find and correct the error.)


26. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE ACTION BEGUN? _________

(Find what action and complete it, but no R3R or R3RA.)


27. LOCATION OF INCIDENT NEEDS ATTENTION? _________

(Locate the incident to blow.)


28. A BT IS PROTESTING? _________

(Handle the protest.)


29. YOU WERE PROTESTING? _________

(Handle the protest.)


30. LEANING ON A WALL? _________

(Indicate-find what the Pre-OT is leaning on.)


31. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS INCORRECT? _________

(Correct the sequence.)


32. INCORRECT OWNERSHIP OF INCIDENT? _________

(Indicate.)


33. RUDIMENTS WERE OUT? _________

(Fly the out Ruds.)


34. A THETAN HAS BEEN INVALIDATED? _________

(Handle the invalidation.)


35. A BT HAS BEEN OVERRUN? _________

(Indicate it to correct BT.)


36. YOU ARE COPYING A BANK YOU USED TO HAVE? _________

(Indicate.)


37. YOU ARE JUST MOCKING UP BTs? _________

(Indicate.)


38. THESE ARE PICTURES OF PAST CLUSTERS? _________

(Indicate.)


39. THERE ARE NO BTs LEFT? _________

(Indicate.)


40. YOU ARE JUST AUDITING COPIES OF BT PICTURES? _________

(Handle copies )


41. THESE ARE YOUR OWN PICTURES? _________

(Find whose pictures, and blow the BT. If
they really were the pc's pictures it would
mean s/he wasn't Clear. These will usually
turn out to be a BT's pictures misowned.)


42. AUDITING ITSELF IS MAKING A CLUSTER? _________

(D/L the session.)


43. A BT IS HAVING CASE TROUBLE? _________

(Indicate. Handle the BT.)


44. YOU ARE CREATING THE INCIDENT I'S AND BLOWING THEM? _________

(Indicate.) 


45. YOU FAILED TO QUIT ON A WIN? _________

(Indicate. Rehab by D/L.)


46. USED TOO WIDE AN INTENTION SPAN? _________

(Indicate. Pick out individuals and handle.)


47. RESTIMULATED MORE THAN WERE BLOWN? _________

(Indicate. Handle restimulated individuals.)


48. ARC BROKE A BT? _________

(Assess BT's ARC Break and handle.)


49. GOT MISEMOTIONAL TOWARD A BT? _________

(Indicate. Find the BT, and handle to blow.)


50. AUDITOR CODE BREAKS ON BTs? _________

(Repair the Code breaks and handle each to blow.)


51. DIDN'T ACKNOWLEDGE A BT? _________

(Indicate. Acknowledge the BT and handle to blow.)


52. DIDN'T BELIEVE A BT OR CLUSTER? _________

(Get off the disbelief, handle the BT or cluster.)


53. A BT WHO HAS AN ARC BREAK? _________

(Handle the ARC Break.)


54. A BT WHO HAS A PTP? _________

(Handle the PTP.)


55. A BT WHO HAS A WITHHOLD? _________

(Pull the withhold.)


56. A BT WHO HAS AN OVERT? _________

(Pull the overt.)


57. OVER-REPAIR? _________

(Indicate.)


58. YOU WEREN'T ALLOWED TO ATTEST? _________

(Indicate. Get off the non-acceptance and any Invalidation.)


L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH:dm:kjm
Copyright  1969 1975, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

END OF CLASS VIII MATERIALS

**************


