   
   CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 11/16

CLASS VIII COURSE PACK

CONTENTS:


Part 11

120. HCOB 18 APR 68 NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV
121. HCOB 14 OCT 68 METER POSITION
122. HCOB  5 MAR 65 BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES - APPLICATION OF TECH
123. HCOB 12 DEC 68 INVALIDATION AND THE GOOD AUDITOR
124. HCOB 23 AUG 68 WORKABILITY OF TECH
125. HCOB 23 AUG 68 ARBITRARIES
126. HCOB 28 AUG 68 OUT TECH
127. HCOB  7 MAY 69 SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT, ...
128. HCOB  4 SEP 68 CLASS VIII
129. HCOB  6 SEP 68 CHECKING FOR FALSE READS
130. HCOB 10 SEP 68 &quot;STANDARD&quot; TECH DATA
131. HCOB 28 FEB 75 add. 10 Sep 68 GREEN FORM, S &amp; D
132. HCOB 10 SEP 68 FLUNKS
133. HCOB 11 SEP 68 FALSE READS
134. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII (re Purpose List)
135. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII &quot;The first thing....&quot;
136. HCOB 19 SEP 68 (re Old Lists)
137. HCOB 28 SEP 68 REVIEW, ORDERING PEOPLE TO
138. HCOB 20 SEP 68 GLEE
139. HCOB 22 SEP 68 CLASS VIII &quot;Auditors must always....&quot;
140. HCOB 25 SEP 68 CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS
141. HCOB 26 SEP 68 &quot;The study of the 'Well Done' LRH C/Sed Folders...&quot;
142. HCOB 11 APR 77 LIST ERRORS, CORRECTION OF
143. HCOB 30 SEP 68 LISTS
144. HCOB 20 APR 72 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION
145. HCOB 23 SEP 68 DRUGS &amp; TRIPPERS
146. HCOB 20 SEP 78 LX LIST HANDLING
147. HCOB  2 AUG 69 r. 4 Sep 78 &quot;LX&quot; LISTS
148. HCOB  5 NOV 69 r. 4 Sep 78 LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2)
149. HCOB  3 AUG 69 r. 22 Aug 78 LX2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST
150. HCOB  9 AUG 69 r. 4 Nov 78 LX1 (CONDITIONS)
151. HCOPL 7 APR 70 r. 8 Dec 78 GREEN FORM
152. HCOB 25 NOV 71 RESISTIVE CASES - FORMER THERAPY


120. HCOB 18 APR 68 NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 18 APRIL 1968

Remimeo
Qual Divs
Rev
AOs
OT Study Materials


NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV


In doing Green Forms or Analysis Lists on any Clears (but
not in nulling) or doing them on most cases above 5 and
some cases below it, there are 2 different E-Meter needle
phenomena which have to be given attention:

1. As a Clear's postulates read as a surge, usually fairly
long (over 1&quot;), &quot;No&quot; can read if the pc says it to himself
as an answer to a question asked.

A read, therefore, does not mean invariably &quot;yes&quot; or that
the question is charged. All it means is that the Meter has
read.

The Auditor must now find out what the read was before
determining he should do something about that portion of
the Green Form or List. One doesn't just assume the read
was &quot;yes&quot;.

One asks about the read as a general rule, not assuming at
once the thing asked was charged.

Example-

Auditor: &quot;Do you have a missed withhold?&quot; Meter surges.

Auditor: &quot;What was that?&quot;

Pre OT: &quot;I thought No I don't.&quot;

Auditor: &quot;Ok. Do you have a missed withhold?&quot;

Pre OT: &quot;No.&quot;-Meter didn't read.

Auditor: &quot;Anything suppressed-asserted-protested-invalidated. 
Ok that's clean.&quot;

Ticks ( 1 / 8 inch) often mean something is there. A Pre
OT's postulates have greater length when they surge.

It is not important how you handle this phenomena of
postulate or to-oneself comment by a high level case. It i
s important that the Auditor does not hang the case with a
wrong adjudication of what's wrong by thinking every surge
means &quot;yes&quot;, or that the question is charged because it
surges. A question is charged only if it won't clean up
with buttons until the action itself is taken.

A Pre OT, unlike pcs below Grades I or II, usually
recognizes what is wrong as soon as it is mentioned. He or
she is more aware.

2. A response like a brief dirty needle on a Pre OT means
&quot;No&quot; always.

So there is a certain and trustworthy negative to be had on
a Pre OT.

A real dirty needle is constant and continues. The same
small jerky needle action on a person Grade 5 or above
means &quot;No!&quot; or that the question is negative.

On pcs below 5 it means a withhold or an ARC break or
almost anything and is of course continuous.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jc.rd 
Copyright  1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

121. HCOB 14 OCT 68 METER POSITION


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 14 OCTOBER 1968

Remimeo


METER POSITION


YOU MUST NEVER NEVER NEVER HAVE YOUR METER IN A POSITION
WHERE THE PRECLEAR CAN READ THE TA.

To do so can cause the pc worry about his TA position and
take his attention off his case.

It violates Clause 17 of the Auditor's Code.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH :jp.ei.rd
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

122. HCOB  5 MAR 65 BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES - APPLICATION OF TECH


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 5 MARCH 1965
Issue II

Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students
Sthil Staff 

ALL LEVELS

BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES

APPLICATION OF TECH

A sure road to award and glory is to find a new application
for an existing Scientology process or principle or book.

The period of the discovery of principles, processes or
original works is surely over as we have everything between
the snake's stomach and the high sky by way of natural laws.

Inventing and using new processes is a sure way to slow
down the advance. There were only so many anyway and it's
been done.

But new ways to apply or disseminate what we've got are
welcome, welcome, welcome.

We've not nearly enough of those and we'll be inventing or
seeing them for the next umpty trillion years.

So my hat is off to Beth Fordyce, HCO Area Sec Detroit,
U.S.A., who informed us via U.S. Continental of a new use
for The Book of Case Remedies for which she'll receive a
bow and appropriate award, to wit her DScn.

Here is her report.

&quot;At the January D.C. Congress, I had some interesting data
about The Book of Case Remedies that you (HCO Cont Sec
U.S.) thought I ought to write up for Ron because you felt
he'd be interested in it. Here it is.

&quot;We've had several instances where people have read the
remedies and come in to tell me that certain ones 'fit'
them. Then when they started to tell me which ones
specifically, they couldn't remember them-or they would be
able to remember only one. The book obviously indicates
by-passed charge, and handles most of the problems. They
find out what their problem actually is.

&quot;One fellow who has been ARC broken with Scientology for
years (even before I heard of Scn), came in and I asked him
to find himself in the remedies. He started reading them,
and each one seemed to fit him (except about 3 or 4 of
them). I noted them down one by one, as he called them to
me. When he finished, I said no more about it.

&quot;Later on-about 15 minutes-he decided he'd better look
through those again because he 'was sure that they didn't
all fit-maybe some of them have changed'. So he went
through them again, one by one, and only 3 still seemed to
apply-and only ONE of them was strongest, he felt. The
other two seemed to have lost their punch.

&quot;He was quite different after that. I also did what the
remedy called for, which cleaned it up. The last time I saw
him-at our Congress-he not once mentioned the problem he's
always had with eye-spots. (And, frankly, I was afraid at
that point to say 'eye-spots' to him for fear he'd key it
back in again, so I just settled for HIS not mentioning it!)

&quot;As soon as we get our next batch of Remedies, I intend to
send at least 4 of them as gifts to people who are badly
ARC broken with us. If they actually read them, I know
exactly what will happen-they can't stay ARC broken.

Best,

Beth

So there's a wide open door. Try it out on &quot;rough cases&quot;
and demand ARC Broken ones do it and write you back or tell
you which one it is.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jw.pw.rd 
Copyright  1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

123. HCOB 12 DEC 68 INVALIDATION AND THE GOOD AUDITOR


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 12 DECEMBER 1968

Class VIII

INVALIDATION AND THE GOOD AUDITOR

It was discovered in the Sea Organisation that proven high
calibre good standard Class VIII auditors suddenly without
any apparent reason ceased to be able to audit well, made
gross goofs and backed off from auditing completely.

Its source was traced back to INVALIDATION.

The cases on whom it occurred were handled very speedily,
very simply with ASTOUNDING RESULTS.

The remedy was simply asking them in 2 way comm who had
told them they couldn't audit. No meter, no complications,
just very simple 2 way comm.

One of the cases was in fact handled in a room full of
people. This case was black in the face and most adamantly
refused to audit and ARC broken to the extent that she
PHYSICALLY WALKED AWAY from the idea.

The question was simply asked &quot;WHO told you you couldn't
audit?&quot;, or &quot;that your auditing wasn't any good?&quot; &quot;Nobody
did.&quot; &quot;OK. WHO told you your auditing wasn't any good?&quot;
Sudden misemotion &quot;you all did&quot; ... &quot;OK WHO?&quot; ... BRIGHTENS
..says a name.

&quot;OK ... did somebody at some earlier stage tell you you
couldn't audit?&quot; &quot;No...but sos and so told me that I wasn't
doing any good in such and such...ooooooh..line charge...my
mother always told me that I couldn't do...bla bla bla...&quot;
Very bright now, still slightly hesitant..&quot;OK..when is
ALWAYS?&quot;...&quot;When I was 6&quot;...BINGO.

Back to auditing, and ... getting &quot;WELL DONES&quot;, and pc's
WINNING, auditor getting STANDARD sessions and STANDARD
results.

And that is ALL there is to it. We are talking here about
the Class VIII auditor giving this assist and the Class
VIII auditor receiving it. Scientologists of this calibre
and standard of training can be expected to have the
awareness and ability to bring these results about.

The length it took for these actions was from about 3 to 5 minutes.

The Class VIII auditor is an outstanding target for
invalidation. BEWARE!! The actions described above were
done virtually off the cuff by a Class VIII auditor on
other Class VIII's, and were done when the INVALIDATION
factor was isolated as the common denominator.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:OJR:ldm:de
Copyright  1968
by L. RON HUBBARD
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

124. HCOB 23 AUG 68 WORKABILITY OF TECH


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1968

Class VIII

WORKABILITY OF TECH

The quality of technology is to the degree it increases
percentages of cures it obtains within the framework of the
society in which it operates. 22 1 / 2 % will change for
the better or &quot;get well&quot; on sugar pills. 33% will make it
regardless of how the tech is applied. The percentages from
these on up are determined by the formula.

Early Dianetics with a raw book auditor run well over 50%.

Then into Scientology shot the percentages up to 97%, 3%
here being those heavily PTS and so on. Even these are
being handled with standard tech eventually.

These percentages are all inclusive of all possible tech
errors because we do get the percentages finally.

This then shows that Scientology technology, when applied
by standard tech action, will give a fantastic percentage
of successes to the auditor who does only standard tech
actions.

The older practices have a very hard time showing 10% even
though 22 1/2% recover on sugar pills.

The quality of Scientology technology is in the
percentages, provable and observable.

The workability of Scientology can be shown. Do so. Older
practices can't.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

125. HCOB 23 AUG 68 ARBITRARIES


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 23 AUGUST 1968

Class VIII

ARBITRARIES

Any arbitrary entered into any line is a way to stop that line.

An auditor doing a job of auditing suddenly enters an
arbitrary such as &quot;The pc now has a grief charge so he must
have a withhold as I've just cleaned up ARC breaks.&quot; Or any
such wild think. This arbitrary would stop that pc's case
right now.

You get all there is to know about tech from HCOBs, tapes, books.

This is all.

Here's one-when the needle on an E-Meter read in the
response to an auditor's question, all you know is that the
needle on the E-Meter read. That's all you know. Now in the
next few seconds you will prove out, as to whether the read
was to the question or to something else like a protest. To
assume anything else in regard to meter reads is an
arbitrary and will close up that pc with a bang.

That's the data. Knock off all the arbitraries NOW.

Punch in hard standard tech. Standard tech is that tech
which has absolutely no arbitraries.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.ja.pc
Copyright  1968
By L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

126. HCOB 28 AUG 68 OUT TECH


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 28 AUGUST 1968

Remimeo
Class VIII
All Orgs


OUT TECH


After Standard Tech is out for just so long in an org,
Scientology ceases to have any meaning.

Squirrel processes and repairs wind the staff up in a ball,
enturbulate the field and cause a general lethargy and trouble.

Ethics then goes in hard or it all goes up in smoke.

There is only one Standard Tech! It contains only a few
dozen processes and actions. It was not complete before
1966. Students study mainly the Research Line. Standard
Tech consists of the exact grade processes and Case Repair.

Some still look for magic buttons that resolve a case all
at once. Some can't duplicate what they read and hear.

They need the broad body of knowledge.

BUT the actual application of Dian &amp; Scn today contains
only a few dozen STANDARD INVARIABLE SIMPLE actions and
processes.

When these are not used, when opinion enters, it's all gone.

STANDARD TECH ALONE RESOLVES ALL CASES.

No matter how bright, the other processes and new
inventions of someone else (a) work only on a few and (b)
are efforts to solve one's own case by auditing others.

To let Standard Tech go out is an act of Treason as
Scientology then loses all meaning in an org.

This is why I am teaching a Class VIII Course.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH-jp.ei.bh
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

127. HCOB  7 MAY 69 SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT, ...


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 7 MAY 1969
(Revision of HCOB 1 September 1968)

Issue VI
Remimeo
Cl VIII
Dianetic Course


SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR'S REPORT,
WORKSHEETS AND SUMMARY REPORT, WITH SOME
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


AUDITOR'S REPORT

An Auditor's Report should contain:

Date

Name of Auditor

Name of Pc

Condition of Pc

Length of Session

Time Session started and ended

TA at beginning and end of Session

Rudiments

What Process was run-LISTING THE EXACT

COMMANDS (often forgotten by most auditors)

Time of Start and End of Process

Whether Process is flat or not Any F/Ns.

WORK SHEETS

A Work Sheet is supposed to be the complete running record
of the session from beginning to end. The Auditor should
not be skipping from one page to another but should just be
writing page after page as the session goes along.

A Work Sheet is always foolscap, 8 x 13 inches, written on
both sides and each page is numbered. Pc's name is written
on each separate sheet.

A Work Sheet may be in 2 columns depending on how big the
writing is of the Auditor.

When the session is completed, the Work Sheets are put in
proper sequence and stapled with the Auditor's Report Form
on top from beginning to end of session.

TA and time notations should be made at regular intervals
throughout the session.

When making a list on a Pc:

1. Always mark a read as it reads-F. LF. BD.

2. Always circle the reading item. Mark if indicated to the
Pc with IND.

3. Always when extending a list put in a line from where it
has been extended, e.g.

Item Joe

Shoes

Socks

____________________ extended

Sky

Wax

Pigs, etc., etc.

NOTE: When you repair an old auditing session you always
write on the old auditing report and W/sheets in a
different coloured pen with the date of the-report.

When running various processes in a session, mark each F/N
clearly noting time and TA.

SUMMARY REPORT

A Summary Report is written exactly as per HCOB 17 March
1969, &quot;Summary Report&quot;.

Two gross goofs I have noticed since case supervising
folders on the RSM is that Auditors have not been turning
in Ethics cases to the MAA. In one instance, a Pc was
audited by 2 auditors in 2 different sessions, got a R/S on
crimes against Scientologists and M/W/Hs and neither
auditor turned the Pc in to Ethics. This is not the only
instance. The second thing is that Auditors are very
evaluative of the Pc's case as indicated by their comments
on the Summary Report. This is incorrect; this report is
used simply as an exact record of what happened during the
session. It is not up to the auditor to evaluate the Pc's
Case, this is the Case Supervisor's job. The auditor may
suggest what is to be run, at which time the Case
Supervisor will review the session, what was run, how the
Pc went in relation to what was being run and then give his
directions.

-------------

Auditor Report Forms or W/sheets are never recopied. The
Auditor should always read over his W/sheets before turning
in folder to the Case Supervisor and, if any words or
letters are missing or cannot be read, they should be
written in with a different coloured pen.

If these rules are followed it will make the Case
Supervisor's job much much easier and auditors' reports
more valuable.

To add the obvious, it is a CRIME to give any session or
assist without making an Auditor's Report or to copy the
original actual report after the session and submit a copy
instead of the real report. Assist reports that use only
contact or touch assists may be written after a session and
sent to Qual.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.an.cs.ei.cden
Copyright  1969
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

128. HCOB  4 SEP 68 CLASS VIII


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 4 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII

Don't force a pc who is ill. The whole intention when
auditing a pc who is sick is making him well.

If overts, or M/W/Hs don't read, even though he is
nattering, then they are not available to be run right then.

A preclear who is not well cannot look, his havingness is
down and he must be handled permissively-always.

The mechanism of RELEASE must be well understood to make an
ill person well. They plunge down the track madly on any
excuse. They require much lighter auditing than they stand
up to when well.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jp.ts 
Copyright  1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

129. HCOB  6 SEP 68 CHECKING FOR FALSE READS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII


CHECKING FOR FALSE READS


When you check for earlier auditor false reads on a GF or
rudiment type read: When follow-up of the read seems to bog
down, get nowhere and when pc has no answers.

When the pc protests, seems ARC Broken by the read or seems
resigned.

When the pc starts to explain how the thing has been run before.

When there is protest or inval.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jp.ts 
Copyright  1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

130. HCOB 10 SEP 68 &quot;STANDARD&quot; TECH DATA


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manors East Grinstead. Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII

&quot;STANDARD&quot; TECH DATA

&quot;Standard&quot; in standard tech auditing is a precise activity,
done with good TRs, exact grade processes and exact actions.

A Green Form is done by handling every read, not by &quot;uhuh&quot;
or nulling it, or doing it after the GF is all done.

Observe the Auditor's Code in every line and do the usual
and solve the case.

Standard action in handling Green Form ARC Brks PTP and
M/W/H (a) Itsa (b) If not cleared on Itsa get the basic on
the chain. All GF and L and ruds follow this rule. A
process is not used except ARC break ARCU CDEI.

Always do a list like L1, L4 or GF, etc., by handling each
read as it's found.

Random auditing on pcs and pre-OTs should not be done.
Knock off these arbitrary &quot;Somebody else thinks he needs
a_____.&quot; This is evaluative and a break of the Auditor's
Code. Pcs can be stopped by over-repairs they just need to
get on with it.

Do standard GF and remedy actions and let pc or pre-OT get
on with the next cycle of section or grade.

It's the grade processes and OT levels that improve cases.
The process the pc should be on is always the next grade.

If TA rises between sessions. get it down with ruds and if
that doesn't get it down, a Green Form. This is a standing
order. TAs that won't come down with routine rudiments come
down with GF.

True of ALL rehabbing actions is you don't rehab on a high
TA at session start. Only when it is just then overrun.
Then you rehab it back to F/N.

In ruds, all you know when you see a read is that the meter
read and the question you asked. The meter read is not
uniformly what you asked and can be a protest or a
REPEATING FALSE READ. Usually one goes right along auditing
but when pc shows any sign of protest or bafflement on a
rud read, you routinely trace it for an earlier false read,
find and clean it.

If an R/S won't clean up on a pc, clean up &quot;Have you ever
been accused of things you haven't done&quot; as a process as
the R/S may be from invalidation. Can also clean up protest.

R/S on a child may be:

(A) Don't tell. Somebody told him not to.

(B) Crime.

(C) Accusation-said you did something you didn't do.

You set up a case with F/N before you undertake major new
actions. Always set up a case to be run. End off an action
at F/N.

It's not safe to begin a session without an ARC Br check
when there's been a time between sessions.

With pcs in sad effect, you should always check ARC break
of long duration.

You treble time in session every time you take any breaks.
To economize in auditing time (session time) you should cut
out breaks as they get the pc in trouble when he's out of
the room, then you have to clean it up and so time is lost.

No TA on a Sec Check means pc tends to be out of valence.
Anybody has a few.

TA goes high and low when a pc is going into and to PT from
a heavy past life.

Never tell a pc he will have another session in session as
it continues the session and doesn't end it. An old old old
rule.

You never let pc off cans in standard tech.

A persistent item that doesn't blow is usually a wrong
item. Other symptoms could proceed from a wrong item.

A Prepcheck in nearly every case turns on and uncovers old
ARC breaks. In doing a Prepcheck be alert for BIs, and ask
ARC Br question.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jp. ja
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

131. HCOB 28 FEB 75 add. 10 Sep 68 GREEN FORM, S &amp; D


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968-1

ADDITION OF 28 FEBRUARY 1975

Remimeo

Class VIII


(This is an amendment of HCO B 10 Sept 68, &quot;Green Form, S &amp;
D, Remedy B&quot;. NOTE: Original HCO B 10 Sept 68 is changed in
distribution to Solo C/S Crse and is not cancelled as it contains
vital data for the Solo C/S.)


GREEN FORM, S &amp; D

It was found in C/Supervising aboard the RSM that the
following additives had been entered and are not altogether
correct.

1. &quot;Green Form to Free Needle.&quot; Not necessarily correct. It
may or may not. Each item on the Green Form is independent
of the rest. However it can be a serious blunder to
continue a GF past an F/N. I have seen TAs then rise.

The only time you would ever do this (go past an F/N on a
Green Form) would be when GIs were not in and the pc still
felt he was in trouble. In this case the F/N is probably an
ARC Brk needle and an ARC Break should be checked.

2. &quot;S &amp; Ds to F/N&quot; (WSU). Not necessarily true. You stop as
per listing rules.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.nt.rd
Copyright  1968,1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

132. HCOB 10 SEP 68 FLUNKS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII


FLUNKS


These are the most common goofs found made by auditors in
case supervising over a hundred folders.

(1) Pc audited with no instructions from C/S.

(2) Audited on squirrel process.

(3) False Auditor Report-FLUNK FLUNK.

(4) Audited past F/N.

(5) Auditing a pc while on medication.

(6) Auditing a pc while ill.

(7) Leaving pc with a problem.

(8) Auditing a pc on no sleep.

(9) Nulling an L1 to largest read.

(10) Not giving pc his item.

(11) Not tracing an ARC break, M/W/H or PTP down to basic
when it doesn't blow.

(12) Not handling reading GF items as they occur.

(13) Failure to use ruds on even GF when TA rises between
session before starting major action of session.

(14) Not following C/S instructions.

(15) Taking frequent breaks.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.wa
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

133. HCOB 11 SEP 68 FALSE READS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII


FALSE READS


False Reads are handled by checking back any that are false
to when they were first &quot;seen&quot; by an auditor.

Sometimes a false read goes on and on, never cleans because
there wasn't anything there in the first place.

Find when and where somebody thought it read when it
didn't. Can ask, &quot;Who said you had an______reading when you
didn't have one?&quot;

Also check Protest, Invalidate and Suppress to clean up a
false read.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jpts 
Copyright  1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

134. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII (re Purpose List)


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII


Pc looking or continually feeling tired = blunted purpose,
evaluation and invalidation .

M/W/H gives a nattery critical aspect, not &quot;Pc looks tired&quot;
as one auditor thought.

Pc feels tired. Do a purpose list as follows:

What purpose has been blunted? (You can also use
&quot;abandoned&quot; if it reads better.) Find an item. If no F/N,
Prepcheck it to F/N.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

135. HCOB 15 SEP 68 CLASS VIII &quot;The first thing....&quot;


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII


The first thing I learned about teaching a Class VIII
auditor is he thinks he can fly before he can even creep.

Such is the power of standard tech, it can go to his head
as an auditor and as a Case Supervisor before he learns
even the barest essentials.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

136. HCOB 19 SEP 68 (re Old Lists)


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1968

Remimeo
L&amp;N Chksht
Class VIII
(Reissued 8 May 72 with extended distribution)


Old lists are NOT TO BE COPIED. They are to be corrected in
their original form but using a different coloured pen to
show what has been done-always date new uses of these lists
also using the same colour pen as used for renulling or
addition to them.

When listing you always note down F, BDs, SF, LF, etc, next
to the items. This is done AS YOU LIST.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.nt.rd
Copyright  1968, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

137. HCOB 28 SEP 68 REVIEW, ORDERING PEOPLE TO


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1968

Remimeo
Class VIII

REVIEW, ORDERING PEOPLE TO

Ordering people to Review for rehab or Review of grades
when they are not ethics cases and no outness is found in
the folder acts as an Invalidation of gains and can react
seriously on a case.

It must cease.

A specific folder outness or a chronic low conditions case
are the only reasons to review grades.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.ts
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

138. HCOB 20 SEP 68 GLEE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1968

Remimeo
Class VIII


GLEE


When you see glee on some fellow on a post, realize it's
because he doesn't understand what he's doing.

He's ignorant about something and above that is confusion
and above the confusion you see glee.

People who make fun of a serious needful action or duty
just don't dig it, that's all.

There are remedies. There's instruction or Remedy B. And
these should be used.

But this glee is nevertheless a kind of insanity. Freud
mentioned that people who couldn't understand something
sometimes giggled in an embarrassed kind of way. I rarely
take any data from him but in this case, he was right. It
was a good observation.

However, he had no cure for it.

You can get a whole area into a kind of glee when they
don't grasp what they are doing.

If you see somebody in glee, get a Remedy B run on them in Qual.

Glee is a special kind of embarrassed giggling. You'll know
it when you see it.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH :jp.rd 
Copyright 1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

139. HCOB 22 SEP 68 CLASS VIII &quot;Auditors must always....&quot;


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII


Auditors must always put the pc's grade or OT level very
prominently on the Auditing Report.

A Case Supervisor cannot properly C/S a case without having
this data.

To not do this is out admin and gets Liability.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

140. HCOB 25 SEP 68 CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1968

(Reissued broadly 5 Oct '72)

Remimeo
SHSBC Class Vl
Class IV
GF-40XRR CHECKSHEET


CONTINUOUS PT OVERTS


A listing question used to handle the continuous present
time overt question on the Green Form is:

&quot;What are you trying to prevent?&quot;

This is listed and follows all listing and nulling rules
and lists to one item reading.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.nt.rd
Copyright  1968, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

141. HCOB 26 SEP 68 &quot;The study of the 'Well Done' LRH C/Sed Folders...&quot;


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1968

Class VIII

The study of the &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/S Folder-the actual
sessions themselves, makes the difference between a
probable six months or 3-week course.

This is the difference between making auditors and not
making auditors and anyone who removes them from the line
will be shot.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

142. HCOB 11 APR 77 LIST ERRORS, CORRECTION OF


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 11 APRIL 1977

Remimeo
Level III
Level IV
Snr Class IV 
Ex Dn 
All Cl IV Auditors

LIST ERRORS

CORRECTION OF


It has been found that the correction of lists, a very
vital piece of tech, has been a source of confusion in the
field as it apparently has never been written up in an
issue. It really is simple if you know your Laws of L &amp; N.

VERIFYING A LIST

The correct procedure for verifying/correcting past L &amp; Ns
is to check the items as to whether or not they are
correct. Then do an L4BRA on each list where the item is
found to be incorrect. You would have to orient the pc to
the listing question and the item. You do not direct the
question to see if it read. And don't just do an L4BRA and
then not find the right item for the pc as part of the
handling (unless the question proves to be uncharged or
some such).

NULLING A LIST

One nulls a list when he doesn't get a BD F/N item on
listing. The Laws of L &amp; N strictly apply. An L4BRA would
be used if the action bogs with still no item found. One
would also null lists the pc made where no item had been
found such as a 2WC which turned into a listing action with
the pc giving off items or a list the pc somehow made while
not on a meter. In these cases there is no item to verify
with the pc as correct. Just cull the items into a list,
work out with the pc what the question was if it's not
already noted, and null the list.

RECONSTRUCTING A LIST

Sometimes you just don't have the list and can't get it or
it's an old Why Finding or PTS interview for which there
are no worksheets. In this case you get from the pc what
the question was and then get him to give you the items
that were already on the list as the item probably was
already on the list and you don't want the pc to get into
newly listing the question in PT and then getting into an
overlisting situation. Just get him to give you the items
he had already put on the list and more often than not you
will get a BD F/N item. If you don't get the item that way
then you can extend the list.

SELF-LISTING

Watch it on these as every random stray thought a person
has about &quot;why this or that&quot; does not mean it's a
self-list. But do look for it on a person who is
manifesting the horrendous BPC an out list can generate,
who is introspected or has been trying to figure out who is
doing him in after just having seen the Ethics Officer.
Just don't get into trying to make a list out of some
non-standard listing question that won't give you an item.
And actually the usual reason for self-listing is a prior
wrong L &amp; N item or an item not found. People will
self-list to try to find the right item. So find and
correct the earlier out list.



LIST CORRECTION BLOW-UP

When you are going along correcting lists and suddenly you
get a big pc blow-up and it is not resolving on the list
you are correcting you had better quickly realize that you
probably are not correcting the list that is out and you'd
better find out which list it is. There is usually an
earlier out list to be found, if the list you are
correcting does not resolve the upset.

LISTS NOT READING

When you start getting key lists such as Grades III and IV
not reading and no items found it's time for that auditor
to get a thorough overhaul on his metering, eyesight and to
get off all his MUs on L &amp; N. You also could be setting the
pc up for a self-listing situation as he has been given the
listing question but no item has been found. So be very
sure the question did not read even with Suppress and Inval
and TRs were in before getting off a key L &amp; N process.

USE OF L4BRA

The prepared list L4BRA corrects L &amp; N lists. It can be run
on old lists, current lists, general listing. When a pc is
ill after a listing and nulling session or up to 3 days
after, always suspect that a listing action done on the pc
had an error in it and get those lists corrected.

Sometimes it is obvious what the error was per the Laws of
Listing and Nulling. For example there could be two reading
items left on the list in which case you would know to
extend the list as it has been underlisted. If this didn't
go, then an L4BRA would be done on the list.

HANDLING AN L4BRA

You handle reading questions on the L4BRA by the directions
under the question that read. You don't just 2WC these
questions. For example say question 4 read on the L4BRA,
&quot;Is a list incomplete? SF.&quot; You then ask the pc, &quot;What list
is incomplete?&quot; Locate it and get it completed to a BD F/N
item. You don't just 2WC &quot;incomplete lists&quot; to an F/N and
leave it at that.

By the way the L4BRA is missing a line which is &quot;Was it the
first item on the list?&quot; This is being added as it's quite
common that it is the first item and is most often missed.

DO IT RIGHT

An out list can create more concentrated hell with a pc
than any other single auditing error. So it's imperative
that listing errors get properly corrected.

The best thing to do is to have the Laws of Listing and
Nulling drilled line by line and down cold and just do it
right in the first place. Then you will also see at once
where old lists violated these laws and you will not be
yourself doing lists that have to be corrected later.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Assisted by
CS-4/5

LRH:JE:dr
Copyright  1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


**************

143. HCOB 30 SEP 68 LISTS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1968

Remimeo 
L&amp;N Chksht
Class VIII

(Reissued 8 May 1972 with extended distribution)


LISTS


When doing a correction of lists in a folder to get the
correct item and clean the folder up, these rules apply-

1. Get one F/N per type of list. Example: 3 S &amp; Ds type U
are in the folder-you get the item on the first S &amp; D and
an F/N-leave the other two.

2. You can get F/Ns on S &amp; D types WSU, Rem Bs old, new and
environment. But only on each type.

3. To go for any more on one type is dangerous and should
not be done.

This whole procedure should be done only if ordered by the C/S.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.nt.rd
Copyright  1968, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

144. HCOB 20 APR 72 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1972

Issue II
Remimeo

C/S Series 78

PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION


Where untrained Auditors are finding Whys for a Danger
Formula, or post purposes or post products as called for in
the Est O System you will get a certain amount of error and
case disturbance. Such upsets also come from word clearing
by incompetent persons.

The C/S should look for these especially when such
campaigns are in progress. He should suspect them as a
possibility when a case bogs.

A C/S must be sure all such papers and worksheets get into
pc's folders.

A common repair action is to

1. Do an assessment for type of charge.

2. Handle the charge found by the assessment done.

3. Fly all the reading items found on such assessments by
2wc or direct handling.

4. Suspect LISTING ERRORS on any Why or purpose or product
found even though no list exists and reconstruct the list
and L4B and handle it.

5. Handle word clearing of any type in or out of session
with a Word Clear Correction List done in session by an
Auditor.

6. When word clearing is too heavy on the pc or doesn't
clean up suspect he has been thrown into implants which are
mostly words or the words in some engram. As Implants are
actually just engrams, handle it with an L3B.

LISTING

Any item found out of session or by a non-auditor is
suspect of being a Listing and Nulling (L&amp;N) error even
though no list was made.

TODAY A CORRECT L&amp;N ITEM MUST BD AND F/N.

So treat such items as you would list errors and try to
reconstruct the list and either confirm the item or locate
the real item (may have been invalidated and suppressed) or
extend the list and get the real item.

The real item will BD F/N.

One can establish what the situation is with a post
purpose, a Why or a product or any other such item by doing
an L4B.


SELF AUDITING

The commonest reason for self auditing is a wrong or
unfound L&amp;N item.

People can go around and self list or self audit trying to
get at the right Why or product or purpose after an error
has been made.

REACTION

NOTHING PRODUCES AS MUCH CASE UPSET AS A WRONG LIST ITEM OR A

WRONG LIST.

Even, rarely, a DIANETIC LIST can produce wrong list
reactions. Ask the pc for his somatics and he blows up or
goes into apathy. Or blows. Or attacks the auditor.

ALL of the more violent or bad reactions on the part of the
pc come from out lists.

Nothing else produces such a sharp deterioration in a case
or even illness.

OUT LISTS

Therefore when one gets a sharp change in a case (like
lowered tone, violence, blows, &quot;determination to go on in
spite of the supervisor&quot;, long notes from pcs, self C/Sing,
etc, etc, the C/S SUSPECTS AN OUT LIST.

This outness can occur in regular sessions even when the
item was said to BD F/N.

It can occur in &quot;Coffee shop&quot; (out of session auditing of
someone), or by Est Os or poorly trained or untrained staff
members or even in life.

PTS

When such actions as finding items by non-auditors are done
on PTS people the situation can be bad, so one also
suspects the person to be PTS to someone or something.

&quot;PTS&quot; does not communicate well in an assessment question
so one says, &quot;Someone or something is hostile to you&quot; and
&quot;You are connected to someone or something that doesn't
agree with Dianetics or Scientology.&quot;

REPAIRS

The main things to know when doing such repairs are (a)
that such situations as wrong lists or upset people can
occur in an org where untrained people are also using
meters and (b) THAT IT IS UP TO THE C/S TO SUSPECT DETECT
AND GET THEM HANDLED IN

REGULAR SESSION.

Do not ignore the possible bad influence.

As the good outweighs the bad in such cases, it is not a
correct answer to forbid such actions.

It is a correct answer to require all such actions and
worksheets become part of the folder.



One can also persuade the D of T or Qual to gen in the
people doing such actions. And do not ignore the effect
such actions can have on cases and do not neglect to
include them in C/Ses before going on with the regular program.

They can all be repaired.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:nt.rd 
Copyright  1972 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

145. HCOB 23 SEP 68 DRUGS &amp; TRIPPERS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1968

(Reissued 22 January 1972 as &quot;Remimeo&quot;)

Remimeo


DRUGS &amp; TRIPPERS


Any case that won't run or won't rehab is probably a
&quot;tripper&quot;, meaning somebody who has taken drugs.

Standard practice for anyone who has ever taken drugs or
even alcohol is to rehabilitate the moments of releases in
these.

Drugs (or alcohol) give an enforced moment or period of
release. It is surrounded in mass.

LSD, marijuana (pot, hashish), peyote, opium, ether (in
operations), nitrous oxide (laughing gas in dental
operations), weird &quot;biochemical&quot; compounds used by
&quot;psychiatrists&quot;, Benzedrine, solid alcohol (canned heat),
alcohol, turpentine, gasoline, witch herbs of various
kinds, and even certain rays, in this lifetime and on the
back track, could have caused a moment of release.

Death does also but it's a bit steep to rehab.

In a rehab session, or before such a this lifetime one is
audited on grades, the moments of release should be rehabbed.

The C/S directs this to be done before a rehab of ARC
Straight Wire.

Such releases usually need rehabbing only once.

Tough rehabbing and probably all &quot;Black Vs&quot; probably trace
to these chemical &quot;releases&quot;.

They are deadly because they give the sensation of release
while actually pulling in mass.

When &quot;All black&quot; reads on a GF one of these chemical
release periods is probably in restim.

These &quot;Chemical releases&quot; give us a lot of trouble unless
(a) detected and (b) rehabbed.

Such pcs often withhold the fact (non-acceptable or
discreditable datum) quite madly and thus make detection
difficult unless directly asked for on a hard to run case.

Such persons can also be a mess on III if the chemical
period rehabs aren't done.

Delusory or dub-in cases also sometimes trace to chemical
&quot;releases&quot;.

Painkillers, tranquilizers or morphine can also be explored
where no &quot;drug taking&quot; is traced.

All the above come under the heading of forceful
exteriorization and can inhibit the act of exteriorization
on V.

Such pcs are a bit blank, irresponsible or detached.

Each TYPE of chemical which produced &quot;release&quot; must be
rehabbed and it is best to count how many times released on
each type.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.mes.rd
Copyright 1968, 1972
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

146. HCOB 20 SEP 78 LX LIST HANDLING


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue II

Class IV Grad
Check sheets
Snr VI

(Cancels and replaces BTB 26 Nov 71, Issue III OUT OF
VALENCE - 220H and BTB 25 Mar 72R URGENT IMPORTANT
LX3 HANDLING REVISED AND REISSUED. This bulletin does
not change in any way the Class VIII data on LX Lists or Out of
Valence handling.)


LX LIST HANDLING


Ref: 
HCOB 26 Jun 78 RA II NED Series 6RA R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 5 Nov 69R LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2)
HCOB 3 Aug 69R LX2
HCOB 9 Aug 69R LX1 (CONDITIONS)
HCOB 2 Aug 69R &quot;LX&quot; LISTS

In handling Out of Valence from the GF 40 or the Expanded
GF 40RD the LX Lists are used in this order: LX3, LX2, LX1
and if necessary, the last step, 220H.

END PHENOMENA

The end phenomena of the LX Lists is a remarkable valence
shift. The pc will cognite on having been out of valence
and will become himself. It is a cognition on beingness,
not doingness or havingness that indicates the EP of the LX
Lists. DO NOT OVERRUN A PC PAST THIS POINT.

PROCEDURE

Clear each word on the list before assessing it and note
any instant reads which appear while clearing the item.
These are valid reads. (Ref: HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS)
Assess the list Method 5 and take up the largest reading
item. Run each recall flow of that item, then check with
the pc to see if he is interested in running it R3RA.
Handle each flow of the item to EP. After a complete
handling of the item handle the lesser reading items (if
any) as above.

LX3 ATTITUDES

LX3 is the first list assessed. Run reading LX3 items 3 Way
or Quad Recalls and 3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA. Use the
following commands:

Recalls: F1: Recall a time you took the attitude of _______.

F2: Recall a time you caused another to take the attitude
of _______.

F3: Recall a time others caused others to take the attitude
of _______.

F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to take the attitude
of _______.

Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and
unconsciousness when you took the attitude of _______.

F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
your causing another to take the attitude of _______.

F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
others causing others to take the attitude of _______.

F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
you causing yourself to take the attitude of _______.

LX2 EMOTIONS

LX2 items are run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA as
above, substituting the reading emotion for the attitude.

LX1 CONDITIONS

LX1 items are run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA
using the following commands:

Recalls: F1: Recall a time you were _______.

F2: Recall a time you caused another to be _______.

F3: Recall a time others caused others to be _______.

F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to be _______.

Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and
unconsciousness when you were _______.

F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
your causing another to be _______.

F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
others causing others to be _______.

F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
you causing yourself to be _______.

Note: On items &quot;grief&quot; and &quot;loss&quot; the command would be
&quot;Recall a time you had (a) _______.&quot; and &quot;Locate a time
containing pain and unconsciousness when you had (a)
_______.&quot;, etc.

220H

220H is done after completing LX3, LX2 and LX1 if the pc
has not experienced a remarkable valence shift and had a
valence cognition. If the valence shift and cognition occur
any time during the handling of the LX Lists, that is the
end phenomena for LX handling and all further actions
connected with LX Lists handling are ceased.

220H is run 3 Way or Quad Recalls and Engrams R3RA, using
the following commands: Recalls: F1: Recall a time you were
being someone else.



F2: Recall a time you caused another to be someone else.

F3: Recall a time others caused others to be someone else.

F0: Recall a time you caused yourself to be someone else.

Engrams: F1: Locate a time containing pain and
unconsciousness when you were being someone else.

F2: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
your causing another to be someone else.

F3: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
others causing others to be someone else.

F0: Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness of
you causing yourself to be someone else.

Each recall flow is run to F/N, cognition and VGIs. Each
engram flow must go to F/N, postulate and VGIs. (This will
be the erasure.) If you encounter any trouble, use an L3RF.

Done correctly, LX Lists will bring about some very major
changes in your pc.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:kjm
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

147. HCOB  2 AUG 69 r. 4 Sep 78 &quot;LX&quot; LISTS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 2 AUGUST 1969R
REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)

Cl IV Grad Checksheets
Snr Cl VI Checksheets 
C/Ses

(Class VIII tapes contain much data on Out of Valence
handling. This Bulletin, formerly Class VIII distribution,
has been revised to present a procedure whereby Snr
Class IV and VI auditors can do LX Lists and Out of
Valence handling on their pus. This revision in no way
revises Class VIII data.)


&quot;LX&quot; LISTS


There are now three &quot;LX&quot; Lists:

LX3-Attitudes

LX2-Emotions

LX1-Conditions.

Originally they were called &quot;X&quot; because they were experimental.

They still are to some extent so the X is retained.

These serve to isolate REASONS A BEING IS CHARGED UP TO
SUCH an extent that he is OUT OF VALENCE.

When a person is out of valence he does not easily as-is his bank.

These lists are assessed Method 5.

The best reading item (and then subsequently reading items)
are taken up and run by: 3-Way or Quad Recalls

3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA...

END PHENOMENA

We now have a new discovery. I have found that a person who
is out of valence ex-periences, when run on LX1 lists (and
now the others above, LX2 and LX3) and 220H, a remarkable
valence shift if he is run on enough items.

In one fashion or another he comments on this in session.

This is the end phenomena of Out of Valence processes (the
LX items and 220H).

It is always attained if enough items are run.

Quite ordinary cases are out of valence. If their folder
gets too fat you can assume they are out of valence.

Perverts, suppressives and critical, snide, ruthless,
arrogant or contemptuous per-sonalities are always out of
valence.

A person who is in treason on the 1st dynamic is always out
of valence.

So whether GF No. 40 (h) OUT OF VALENCE reads or not, if
the folder is fat, you play safe and assess and run LX
items until the person has the Valence cognition.

Without being coached, a person who is out of valence
always has the cognition if he is run on enough items and 220H.

USE OF LISTS

One begins with LX3. He assesses it Method 5 and takes the
item that read best, handles it, then the item that read
next best, and so on down the list.

If no EP, LX2 is taken up and handled in the same manner,
then LX1. 220H is the last step of Out of Valence handling
if the EP has not yet been reached.

Today you can assume safely that anyone out of valence can
be put in valence quietly and efficiently with LX items and
220H if he is audited and if the auditing is standard.

This is quite a worthwhile development as it resolves the
heavily overcharged case.

A symptom of a heavily charged case is F/Ning too quickly
to be processed well.

Using these lists on a pc is not a critical action. Even
(and especially) children are too overcharged to be easily
audited.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:ldm.rd.dr
Copyright  1969, 1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

148. HCOB  5 NOV 69 r. 4 Sep 78 LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2)


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 5 NOVEMBER 1969R
Issue V
(HCOB 4 Aug 69 Amended and Revised)

REVISED 4 SEPTEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)

Class IV Grad Checksheets 
Snr C/ass VI 
Checksheets
C/Ses 


LX3 (ATTITUDES) (Used before LX2)


Reference: 
HCOB 2 Aug 69R &quot;LX&quot; LISTS 
HCOB 26 Jun 78 RA II NED Series 6RA R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 20 Sep 78 LX LIST HANDLING


3 Way or Quad Recall

3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA

Date: __________________________________

Pc Name:_______________________________

Treachery ___________

Disloyalty ___________

Helplessness ___________

Hostility ___________

Rudeness ___________

Cruelty ___________

Disobedience ___________

Rebelliousness ___________

Wastefulness ___________

Stinginess ___________

Cowardliness ___________

Dirtiness ___________

Ungodliness ___________

Wickedness ___________

Cunning ___________

Criticism ___________

Falsity ___________

Pretense ___________

Glee ___________

Laughter ___________

Mockery ___________

Embarrassment ___________

Feeling Hurt ___________

Oppressive ___________

Ridicule ___________

Good ___________

Persecution ___________

Betrayal ___________

Guilt ___________

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:ldm.rs.rd.kjm 
Copyright  1969, 1978 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

149. HCOB  3 AUG 69 r. 22 Aug 78 LX2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 3 AUGUST 1969R

REVISED 22 AUGUST 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipses indicate deletions)

Cl IV Grad
Checksheets 
Snr Cl VI 
Checksheets
C/Ses


LX2

EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST


(To be done before LX1)

3 Way or Quad Recall

3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA

Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R &quot;LX&quot; LISTS

HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA

URGENT IMPORTANT

ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM

RUNNING BY CHAINS

HCOB 20 Sep 78II LX LIST HANDLING

Date: _____________________________________

Pc Name:__________________________________

Apprehension ____________

Fear ____________

Hate ____________

Agitation ____________

Shame ____________

Blame ____________

Regret ____________

Grief ____________

Remorse ____________

Sorrow ____________

Sadness ____________

Despondency ____________

Depressed ____________

Despair ____________

Anger ____________

Rage ____________

Greed ____________

Haughty ____________

Arrogant ____________

Cold ____________

Contemptuous ____________

Hostility ____________

Resentment ____________

Antagonism ____________

Boredom ____________

Conservatism ____________

Enthusiasm ____________



Proud ____________

Elation ____________

Serenity ____________

Unemotional ____________

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:rs.rd.jk 
Copyright  1969, 1978 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

150. HCOB 9 AUG 69 r. 4 Nov 78 LX1 (CONDITIONS)


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 9 AUGUST 1969R
REVISED 21 AUGUST 1978
REISSUED 4 NOVEMBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)
(Ellipsis indicates deletion)

Class IV Grad
Checksheet
Snr Class VI 
Checksheet 
C/Ses


LX1 (CONDITIONS)


(Formerly issued to Class VIII auditors
as a research list on 5 October 1968)

Used after LX3 and LX2.

3 Way or Quad Recall

3 Way or Quad Engrams R3RA

Reference: HCOB 2 Aug 69R &quot;LX&quot; LISTS

HCOB 26 Jun 78RA New Era Dianetics Series 6RA

URGENT IMPORTANT

ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM

RUNNING BY CHAINS

HCOB 20 Sep 78II LX LIST HANDLING

Date: _____________________________________

Pc Name:__________________________________

Assessment for largest read.

Overwhelmed ____________

Made Wrong ____________

Forced ____________

Frightened ____________

Suppressed ____________

Crushed ____________

Oppressed ____________

Denied ____________

Overpowered ____________

Overthrown ____________

Defeated ____________

Destroyed ____________

Vanquished ____________

Wiped Out ____________

Annihilated ____________

Changed ____________

Identified ____________

Recognized ____________

Driven Out ____________

Driven Away ____________

Grief ____________

Loss ____________

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:rs.rd.kjm 
Copyright  1969, 1978 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

151. HCOPL 7 APR 70 r. 8 Dec 78 GREEN FORM

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 APRIL 1970RB
REVISED 8 DECEMBER 1978
(Revisions not printed in a different type style)

Remimeo
Class IV Grad
Checksheet 
Class VI
Checksheet
Class IV Grad
Auditors 
C/Ses


GREEN FORM


The Green Form is used to detect the peculiarities and
elements of a pc's life which are causing case trouble or
preventing gains. (It is not used to cure high or low TA.)
You can assess it Method 3 and handle, not going beyond the
first F/N, but its real use is Method 5 and send to the C/S
for programming.

It can also be used in combination with the Expanded Green
Form 40RD to precisely locate and solve any resistiveness
of a pc's case.

Directions for use of the Green Form and the Expanded Green
Form 40RD are given in HCOB 8 December 78 11, GREEN FORM
AND EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD, USE

OF. It is vital, before using these lists, that any auditor
or C/S first checks out on the above issue.

PC NAME: DATE:_______________

AUDITOR: ______________________________________


1A. HAVE YOU NOT HAD SUFFICIENT SLEEP? _________


1B. ARE YOU PHYSICALLY TIRED? _________


1C. HAVE YOU NOT HAD ENOUGH FOOD? _________


1D. ARE YOU HUNGRY? _________


1E. HAVE YOU DRUNK ALCOHOL? _________


IF. HAVE YOU TAKEN ASPIRIN? _________


1G. HAVE YOU TAKEN TRANQUILIZERS? _________


1H. HAVE YOU TAKEN DRUGS? _________

Do not audit a pc who has not had sufficient food or rest
or who has taken aspirin or drugs. If one of the above
questions reads, assess no further; take the question up
with the pc. If he is tired, send him home to rest, if he
is hungry, send him to get well fed, and if he has taken
drugs, he will have to dry out for the time specified in 
HCOB 17 Oct 69RA, DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS.


2A. HAVE YOU GONE EXTERIOR IN AUDITING? _________

If the pc is Clear, Dianetic Clear or OT and has not had an
Int RD, do the End of Endless Int Repair RD per Int Series
4R. Do not run any Dianetics.

Otherwise, if the pc has never had an Int RD, give him a
standard Int RD per Int Series 2.


2B. HAS YOUR INT RD BEEN MESSED UP? _________

Do an Int RD Correction List Revised (HCOB 29 Oct 71RA). If Int
Correction has already been done on the pc get an FES of
the Int RD and its corrections. When all errors are corrected 
the C/S may order the End of Endless Int Repair RD per Int Series 4R.


3. HAS THERE BEEN A LIST ERROR? _________

Find out which and handle with an L4BRA.


4A. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _________

Handle with ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N.


4B. DO YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK WITH THE ENVIRONMENT? _________

ARCU CDEINR E/S to F/N or Remedy B if ordered by the C/S. (Ref:
BTB 14 Aug 68R, REMEDY B-ENVIRONMENT AND &quot;NEW STYLE.&quot;)


4C. DO YOU HAVE A PRESENT TIME PROBLEM? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


4D. HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? _________

Get what, who nearly found out, what they did to miss it,
E/S M/W/H to F/N.


4E. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP? _________

Who wouldn't accept it, who said it still read. Indicate it
was a false read.  2WC the concern.


4F. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT? _________

Pull it, E/S to F/N.


5. ARE YOU EXPERIMENTING? _________

Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.


6. ARE YOU ALTERING TECH? _________

Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.


7. ARE YOU DOING SOMETHING ELSE WITH TECH? _________

Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.


8. HAVE YOU TYPED, HANDWRITTEN OR TAPED COPIES OF ANY
CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS? _________

Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.


9. ARE YOU HERE TO GET DATA FOR SOMEONE ELSE? _________

Get what, when, all, who E/S to F/N.


10. DO YOU HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD OR CRIMES FOR WHICH
YOU COULD BE ARRESTED? _________

Note all crimes, with what, when, all and who and handle
with E/S to F/N.


11. ARE YOU HERE TO BE CURED OF SOMETHING NOT MENTIONED? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


12. DO YOU HAVE UNPAID DEBTS TO ORGS? _________

Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.


13. DO YOU HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF A CRIME AGAINST
SCIENTOLOGY? _________

Get time, place, form and event E/S to F/N.


14. ARE THERE IGNORED ORIGINATIONS? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


15. HAVE YOU BEEN SELF-AUDITING! _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N or L1C on the prior upset. If prior
upset was in auditing, use the appropriate correction list.


16A. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED BY A NONSTANDARD AUDITOR? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


16B. HAS THERE BEEN A NONSTANDARD PROCESS? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


16C. HAS THERE BEEN A BAD AUDITING COMM CYCLE?  _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.  L1C if necessary.


16D. HAVE THERE BEEN CODE BREAKS? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


17A. IS THERE AN ENGRAM IN RESTIMULATION? _________

L3RF and handle. (On a Clear, OT or Dianetic Clear, indicate the 
read. You may do an L3RF if needed, however. do no handling beyond
indicating the read. See HCOB 30 Oct 78 C/S Series 53, USE OF for
further data on handling reading Dianetic items on Clears, OTs and
Dianetic Clears.)


17B. IS A PICTURE NOT ERASED? _________

Handle as in 17A above.


18. IS THERE AN ENGRAM EXACTLY MATCHING PT DANGERS? _________

Run it out Triple or Quad. (On Clears, OTs and Dianetic
Clears, handle as in 17A above.)


19. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON? _________

2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for instructions on further handling if
needed.


20. ARE YOU CONNECTED TO A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP? _________

2WC to F/N. Return to C/S for instructions on further
handling if needed.


21. IS THERE AN ENVIRONMENTAL MENACE? _________

2WC to F/N. Return to C/S.


22. ARE YOU HERE BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE DEMANDED IT? _________

2WC to F/N. Return to C/S.


23A. DO YOU HAVE A HIDDEN STANDARD? _________

L&amp;N &quot;What hasn't been handled?&quot;
L&amp;N &quot;Who or what would have (item above) ?&quot;
Run O/W on the item.


23B. WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN FOR YOU TO KNOW
SCIENTOLOGY WORKS? _________

Handle as in 23A above.


24. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF SCIENTOLOGY WORKED? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


25. CAN'T YOU STUDY? _________

Assess and handle a Study Green Form.


26. HAS ANYTHING BEEN SUPPRESSED? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


27. HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVALIDATED? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


28. HAS ANYTHING BEEN EVALUATED? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


29. HAS ANYTHING BEEN RUSHED? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


30. HAS ANYTHING BEEN MISSED? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


31. HAS A PROCESS BEEN LEFT UNFLAT? _________

2WC for data to F/N. Return to C/S.


32. HAS A PROCESS BEEN OVERRUN? _________

Rehab.


33. HAS A RELEASE BEEN BYPASSED? _________

Rehab.


34. HAVE YOU BEEN OVERREPAIRED? _________

Repair Correction List.


35. HAVE YOU GONE DIANETIC CLEAR? _________

Date/Locate.


36. IS THERE ANYTHING UPSETTING ABOUT THIS REVIEW? _________

Itsa E/S itsa to F/N.


37. IS THIS LIST UNNECESSARY? _________

Indicate. If no F/N rehab or Date/Locate.


38. IS THERE SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN HANDLED? _________

Find out what and handle or return to the C/S.


39. IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _________

Find out what and handle or return to C/S.


RESISTIVE CASES ASSESSMENT

Assess Method 5 the following resistive cases. If any item
reads, go to its corresponding section on the Expanded
Green Form 40RD and assess Method 5 all the items in that
section.

Assess the section on the Expanded Green Form 40RD that
corresponds to each reading item.

When all sections corresponding to the reading resistive
cases items are assessed you will have a full picture of
the pc's resistiveness.

Then, if you have C/S okay, take up each reading section on
the EXGF 40RD in the order in which they are listed below
and handle reads per the instructions given.

Otherwise, return to the C/S for programming.


A-1. WENT DIANETIC CLEAR AND NEVER ATTESTED _________


A-2. HAD ENGRAMS RUN AFTER BEING DIANETIC CLEAR _________


B. DOESN'T WANT AUDITING _________


C. AUDITED WITH RUDIMENTS OUT _________


D. OVERWHELMED _________


E. CONTINUOUSLY COMMITTING OVERTS ON SCIENTOLOGY _________


F-1. SUPPRESSED _________


F-2. CONNECTED TO AN ANTAGONISTIC PERSON _________


G. SERIOUSLY PHYSICALLY ILL _________


H. HAS NOT HAD AUDITING _________


I-1. SEEKING THE SAME THRILL ATTAINED FROM DRUGS _________


I-2. HAS TAKEN DRUGS _________


J. FORMER THERAPY BEFORE SCIENTOLOGY _________


K. HAS BEEN PART OF EARLIER PRACTICES _________


L-1. OUT OF VALENCE _________


L-2. ARE YOU BEING SOMEONE ELSE _________


M. PRETENDING TRAINING OR GRADES NOT ATTAINED _________


N. AUDITED WITH PRIOR GRADES OUT _________


O. MISUNDERSTOODS IN AUDITING _________


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nc 
Copyright (c) 1970, 1974, 1978 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

152. HCOB 25 NOV 71 RESISTIVE CASES - FORMER THERAPY


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 25 NOVEMBER 1971
Issue II
REISSUED 21 SEPTEMBER 1974
(Only change is signature)

Remimeo 
GF-40X
Checksheet

(HCO Bulletin of 23 September 1968, a Class VIII
Confidential Bulletin edited and reissued for information
of Auditors handling GF-40.

NOTE: This does not cancel or replace HCOB 23
Sept 1968 which contains further vital data for the
Class VIII Auditor.)


RESISTIVE CASES

FORMER THERAPY

Hypnotism, &quot;psycho&quot; analysis, &quot;psychiatry&quot; and other
implant type therapies often key in and jam the track.

These characters here, on any other planet and on the whole
track dramatize implanting.

The &quot;therapy&quot; involved would be a temporary relief brought
by suggestion.

The wrong data of the &quot;science&quot; itself operates as a whole
track lie. Getting well or able depends on establishing
truth. These &quot;scientific&quot; lies are alterations of actual laws.

We often note electronics men have a rough case time. This
traces to the lies Man uses for his &quot;electrical science&quot;.
As the subject is based on false assumptions, it itself
tends to aberrate.

Therefore we get out of the road any former &quot;therapy&quot;. We
can rehab any moment of release in it, handle any overrun, etc.

We also do a New Style Remedy B to get old therapies
spotted and run back.

The only cases which hang up are:

1. Unaudited cases (lies about grades, etc).

2. Drug cases (who seek in processing the delusions or
madness which exhilarated them on drugs).

3. Former therapy cases. (In this or past lives.)

4. Out of valence cases.

5. Cases who continue to commit overts on Scn.

6. Cases &quot;audited&quot; with their ruds or grades out.

7. Seriously physically ill cases (where the illness makes
too much PTP in PT).

Of all these the former therapy case is apt to be the
roughest as any auditing session can be reactively mistaken
for the &quot;treatment&quot;. The next roughest is the drug case as
a false exteriorization often occurs on an enforced basis
and may go into restim.

Some drug takers go plowing back into early implants and
drug therapies so the two get crossed up on a case.

To isolate the reason for a highly resistive case or high
TA you can assess the above 7 items and get a clue. Don't
limit it to this lifetime. And don't do it so as to key the
person in hard on things he wasn't in. And don't do it
unless the case is very hard to get a gain on.

Engram running of a crude sort can be found hundreds,
thousands or billions of years ago and consists if it
appears, of an overrun. They didn't know much about it and
overran them badly.

Implants, psychoanalysis, psychiatry, hypnotism get all
snarled up with sex as these birds would commonly (and do)
stage insane sex scenes. They violate the children and
wives of officials even today to produce a degrade and to
make a scene so insane that the &quot;patient&quot; if he remembers
it really thinks he is insane. And if he tries to tell
anybody (or if she tries to tell her husband) it's a prompt
mess, so these &quot;practitioners&quot; hide their activities in
this fashion.

The trouble with such former &quot;therapies&quot; and electric
shock, etc, is that it: (a) groups track by the command of
the practitioner

(b) sends the pc to the start of track WAY back and sticks
him there out of PT.

The keynote of piloting through messes like this is to (A)
Know what kind of a mess it is and (B) Don't EVER force a
pc back track or into anything he doesn't want to confront
easily.

Drugs force the person back into these messes and stick him.

One of these former therapy or drug messes is only hard to
untangle because they are full of incredibles. The pc
doesn't accept them or just try to see what's in them.

The basic rule in any case is Reality is proportional to
the amount of charge removed and so Reality can be
increased simply by removing charge. These surges of the
needle as well as the BDs of the TA are &quot;charge coming off&quot;.

Anything eventually resolves if the pc just keeps on
getting charge off.

The earliest charge is the most important.

Charge off the exact grades is the most valuable.

But ANY charge off will make it, even on former &quot;therapies&quot;.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt.bh.rd
Copyright  1971, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************


