   
   CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 9/16


CLASS VIII COURSE PACK

CONTENTS:

Part 9

92. HCOB  27 SEP 66 THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY, THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST
93. HCOB  31 DEC 78 OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING
94. HCOB  24 NOV 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
95. HCOB  21 JAN 66 S &amp; D ERRORS
96. HCOB   5 FEB 66 S AND D WARNING
97. HCOB  28 JAN 66 S AND D DATA, HOW A SUPPRESSIVE BECOMES ONE
98. HCOB  10 JUN 66 S &amp; D-THE MISSED ITEM
99. HCOB  13 JAN 68 S &amp; Ds
100. HCOB 19 JAN 68 S &amp; Ds BY BUTTON
101. HCOB 19 NOV 78 L &amp; N LISTS - THE ITEM &quot;ME&quot;
102. HCOB 14 OCT 68 r. 1 Jan 76 THE AUDITOR'S CODE
103. HCOB 26 NOV 63 A NEW TRIANGLE: BASIC AUDITING, TECHNIQUE, CASE ANALYSIS


**************************************************

CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 9/16

**************************************************

92. HCOB  27 SEP 66 THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY, THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1966

Remimeo

THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY

THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST

There are certain characteristics and mental attitudes
which cause about 20% of a race to oppose violently any
betterment activity or group.

Such people are known to have anti-social tendencies.

When the legal or political structure of a country becomes
such as to favor such personalities in positions of trust,
then all the civilizing organizations of the country become
suppressed and a barbarism of criminality and economic
duress ensues.

Crime and criminal acts are perpetuated by anti-social
personalities. Inmates of institutions commonly trace their
state back to contact with such personalities.

Thus, in the fields of government, police activities and
mental health, to name a few, we see that it is important
to be able to detect and isolate this personality type so
as to protect society and individuals from the destructive
consequences attendant upon letting such have free rein to
injure others.

As they only comprise 20% of the population and as only
2l/2% of this 20% are truly dangerous, we see that with a
very small amount of effort we could considerably better
the state of society.

Well-known, even stellar, examples of such a personality
are, of course, Napoleon and Hitler. Dillinger, Pretty Boy
Floyd, Christie and other famous criminals were wellknown
examples of the anti-social personality. But with such a
cast of characters in history we neglect the less stellar
examples and do not perceive that such personalities exist
in current life, very common, often undetected.

When we trace the cause of a failing business, we will
inevitably discover somewhere in its ranks the anti-social
personality hard at work.

In families which are breaking up we commonly find one or
the other of the persons involved to have such a personality.

Where life has become rough and is failing, a careful
review of the area by a trained observer will detect one or
more such personalities at work.

As there are 80% of us trying to get along and only 20%
trying to prevent us, our lives would be much easier to
live were we well-informed as to the exact manifestations
of such a personality. Thus we could detect it and save
ourselves much failure and heartbreak.

It is important then to examine and list the attributes of
the anti-social personality.

Influencing as it does the daily lives of so many, it well
behooves decent people to become better informed on this
subject.

ATTRIBUTES

The anti-social personality has the following attributes:

1. He or she speaks only in very broad generalities. &quot;They
say ...&quot; &quot;Everybody thinks...&quot; &quot;Everyone knows...&quot; and such
expressions are in continual use, particularly when
imparting rumor. When asked, &quot;Who is everybody . . .&quot; it
normally turns out to be one source and from this source
the anti-social person has manufactured what he or she
pretends is the whole opinion of the whole society.

This is natural to them since to them all society is a
large hostile generality, against the anti-social in
particular.

2. Such a person deals mainly in bad news, critical or
hostile remarks, invalidation and general suppression.

&quot;Gossip&quot; or &quot;harbinger of evil tidings&quot; or &quot;rumormonger&quot;
once described such persons.

It is notable that there is no good news or complimentary
remark passed on by such a person.

3. The anti-social personality alters, to worsen,
communication when he or she relays a message or news. Good
news is stopped and only bad news, often embellished, is
passed along.

Such a person also pretends to pass on &quot;bad news&quot; which is
in actual fact invented.

4. A characteristic, and one of the sad things about an
anti-social personality, is that it does not respond to
treatment or reform or psychotherapy.

5. Surrounding such a personality we find cowed or ill
associates or friends who, when not driven actually insane,
are yet behaving in a crippled manner in life, failing, not
succeeding.

Such people make trouble for others.

When treated or educated, the near associate of the
anti-social personality has no stability of gain but
promptly relapses or loses his advantages of knowledge,
being under the suppressive influence of the other.

Physically treated, such associates commonly do not recover
in the expected time but worsen and have poor convalescences.

It is quite useless to treat or help or train such persons
so long as they remain under the influence of the
anti-social connection.

The largest number of insane are insane because of such
anti-social connections and do not recover easily for the
same reason.

Unjustly we seldom see the anti-social personality actually
in an institution. Only his &quot;friends&quot; and family are there.

6. The anti-social personality habitually selects the wrong target.

If a tyre is flat from driving over nails, he or she curses
a companion or a non-causative source of the trouble. If
the radio next door is too loud, he or she kicks the cat.

If A is the obvious cause, the anti-social personality
inevitably blames B, or C or D.

7. The anti-social cannot finish a cycle of action.
Such become surrounded with incomplete projects.

8. Many anti-social persons will freely confess to the most
alarming crimes when forced to do so, but will have no
faintest sense of responsibility for them.

Their actions have little or nothing to do with their own
volition. Things &quot;just happened&quot;.

They have no sense of correct causation and particularly
cannot feel any sense of remorse or shame therefore.

9. The anti-social personality supports only destructive
groups and rages against and attacks any constructive or
betterment group.

10. This type of personality approves only of destructive
actions and fights against constructive or helpful actions
or activities.

The artist in particular is often found as a magnet for
persons with anti-social personalities who see in his art
something which must be destroyed and covertly, &quot;as a
friend&quot;, proceed to try.

11. Helping others is an activity which drives the
anti-social personality nearly berserk.

Activities, however, which destroy in the name of help are
closely supported.

12. The anti-social personality has a bad sense of property
and conceives that the idea that anyone owns anything is a
pretense made up to fool people. Nothing is ever really owned.


THE BASIC REASON

The basic reason the anti-social personality behaves as he
or she does lies in a hidden terror of others.

To such a person every other being is an enemy, an enemy to
be covertly or overtly destroyed.

The fixation is that survival itself depends on &quot;keeping
others down&quot; or &quot;keeping people ignorant&quot;.

If anyone were to promise to make others stronger or
brighter, the anti-social personality suffers the utmost
agony of personal danger.

They reason that if they are in this much trouble with
people around them weak or stupid, they would perish should
anyone become strong or bright.

Such a person has no trust to a point of terror. This is
usually masked and unrevealed.

When such a personality goes insane the world is full of
Martians or the FBI and each person met is really a Martian
or FBI agent.

But the bulk of such people exhibit no outward signs of
insanity. They appear quite rational. They can be very
convincing.

However, the list given above consists of things which such
a personality cannot detect in himself or herself. This is
so true that if you thought you found yourself in one of
the above, you most certainly are not anti-social.
Self-criticism is a luxury the anti-social cannot afford.

They must be RIGHT because they are in continual danger in
their own estimation. If you proved one WRONG, you might
even send him or her into a severe illness.

Only the sane, well-balanced person tries to correct his conduct.


RELIEF

If you were to weed out of your past by proper search and
discovery those anti-social persons you have known and if
you then disconnected, you might experience great relief.

Similarly, if society were to recognize this personality
type as a sick being as they now isolate people with
smallpox, both social and economic recoveries could occur.

Things are not likely to get much better so long as 20% of
the population is permitted to dominate and injure the
lives and enterprise of the remaining 80%.

As majority rule is the political manner of the day, so
should majority sanity express itself in our daily lives
without the interference and destruction of the socially
unwell.

The pity of it is, they will not permit themselves to be
helped and would not respond to treatment if help were
attempted.

An understanding and ability to recognize such
personalities could bring a major change in society and our
lives.


THE SOCIAL PERSONALITY

Man in his anxieties is prone to witch hunts.

All one has to do is designate &quot;people wearing black caps&quot;
as the villains and one can start a slaughter of people in
black caps.

This characteristic makes it very easy for the anti-social
personality to bring about a chaotic or dangerous environment.

Man is not naturally brave or calm in his human state. And
he is not necessarily villainous.

Even the anti-social personality, in his warped way, is
quite certain that he is acting for the best and commonly
sees himself as the only good person around, doing all for
the good of everyone-the only flaw in his reasoning being
that if one kills everyone else, none are left to be
protected from the imagined evils. His conduct in his
environment and toward his fellows is the only method of
detecting either the antisocial or the social
personalities. Their motives for self are
similar-self-preservation and survival. They simply go
about achieving these in different ways.

Thus, as Man is naturally neither calm nor brave, anyone to
some degree tends to be alert to dangerous persons and
hence, witch hunts can begin.

It is therefore even more important to identify the social
personality than the anti-social personality. One then
avoids shooting the innocent out of mere prejudice or
dislike or because of some momentary misconduct.

The social personality can be defined most easily by
comparison with his opposite, the anti-social personality.

This differentiation is easily done and no test should ever
be constructed which isolates only the anti-social. On the
same test must appear the upper as well as lower ranges of
Man's actions.

A test that declares only anti-social personalities without
also being able to identify the social personality would be
itself a suppressive test. It would be like answering &quot;Yes&quot;
or &quot;No&quot; to the question &quot;Do you still beat your wife?&quot;
Anyone who took it could be found guilty. While this
mechanism might have suited the times of the Inquisition,
it would not suit modern needs.

As the society runs, prospers and lives solely through the
efforts of social personalities, one must know them as
they, not the anti-social, are the worthwhile people. These
are the people who must have rights and freedom. Attention
is given to the antisocial solely to protect and assist the
social personalities in the society.

All majority rules, civilizing intentions and even the
human race will fail unless one can identify and thwart the
anti-social personalities and help and forward the social
personalities in the society. For the very word &quot;society&quot;
implies social conduct and without it there is no society
at all, only a barbarism with all men, good or bad, at risk.

The frailty of showing how the harmful people can be known
is that these then apply the characteristics to decent
people to get them hunted down and eradicated.

The swan song of every great civilization is the tune
played by arrows, axes or bullets used by the anti-social
to slay the last decent men.

Government is only dangerous when it can be employed by and
for anti-social personalities. The end result is the
eradication of all social personalities and the resultant
collapse of Egypt, Babylon, Rome, Russia or the West.

You will note in the characteristics of the anti-social
personality that intelligence is not a clue to the
anti-social. They are bright or stupid or average. Thus
those who are extremely intelligent can rise to
considerable, even head-of-state heights.

Importance and ability or wish to rise above others are
likewise not indexes to the anti-social.

When they do become important or rise they are, however,
rather visible by the broad consequences of their acts. But
they are as likely to be unimportant people or hold very
lowly stations and wish for nothing better.

Thus it is the twelve given characteristics alone which
identify the anti-social personality.

And these same twelve reversed are the sole criteria of the
social personality if one wishes to be truthful about them.

The identification or labelling of an anti-social
personality cannot be done honestly and accurately unless
one also, in the same examination of the person, reviews
the positive side of his life.

All persons under stress can react with momentary flashes
of anti-social conduct. This does not make them anti-social
personalities.

The true anti-social person has a majority of anti-social
characteristics.

The social personality has a majority of social characteristics.

Thus one must examine the good with the bad before one can
truly label the anti-social or the social.

In reviewing such matters, very broad testimony and
evidence are best. One or two isolated instances determine
nothing. One should search all twelve social and all twelve
anti-social characteristics and decide on the basis of
actual evidence, not opinion.

The twelve primary characteristics of the social
personality are as follows:

1. The social personality is specific in relating
circumstances. &quot;Joe Jones said...&quot; &quot;The Star Newspaper
reported...&quot; and gives sources of data where important or
possible.

He may use the generality of &quot;they&quot; or &quot;people&quot; but seldom
in connection with attributing statements or opinions of an
alarming nature.

2. The social personality is eager to relay good news and
reluctant to relay bad.

He may not even bother to pass along criticism when it
doesn't matter.

He is more interested in making another feel liked or
wanted than disliked by others and tends to err toward
reassurance rather than toward criticism.

3. A social personality passes communication without much
alteration and if deleting anything tends to delete
injurious matters.

He does not like to hurt people's feelings. He sometimes
errs in holding back bad news or orders which seem critical
or harsh.

4. Treatment, reform and psychotherapy particularly of a
mild nature work very well on the social personality.

Whereas anti-social people sometimes promise to reform,
they do not. Only the social personality can change or
improve easily.

It is often enough to point out unwanted conduct to a
social personality to completely alter it for the better.

Criminal codes and violent punishment are not needed to
regulate social personalities.

5. The friends and associates of a social personality tend
to be well, happy and of good morale.

A truly social personality quite often produces betterment
in health or fortune by his mere presence on the scene.

At the very least he does not reduce the existing levels of
health or morale in his associates.

When ill, the social personality heals or recovers in an
expected manner, and is found open to successful treatment.

6. The social personality tends to select correct targets
for correction. He fixes the tyre that is flat rather than
attack the windscreen. In the mechanical arts he can
therefore repair things and make them work.

7. Cycles of action begun are ordinarily completed by the
social personality, if possible.

8. The social personality is ashamed of his misdeeds and
reluctant to confess them. He takes responsibility for his
errors.

9. The social personality supports constructive groups and
tends to protest or resist destructive groups.

10. Destructive actions are protested by the social
personality. He assists constructive or helpful actions.

11. The social personality helps others and actively
resists acts which harm others.

12. Property is property of someone to the social
personality and its theft or misuse is prevented or frowned
upon.


THE BASIC MOTIVATION

The social personality naturally operates on the basis of
the greatest good.

He is not haunted by imagined enemies but he does recognize
real enemies when they exist.

The social personality wants to survive and wants others to
survive, whereas the anti-social personality really and
covertly wants others to succumb.

Basically the social personality wants others to be happy
and do well, whereas the anti-social personality is very
clever in making others do very badly indeed.

A basic clue to the social personality is not really his
successes but his motivations. The social personality when
successful is often a target for the anti-social and by
this reason he may fail. But his intentions included others
in his success, whereas the anti-social only appreciate the
doom of others.

Unless we can detect the social personality and hold him
safe from undue restraint and detect also the anti-social
and restrain him, our society will go on suffering from
insanity, criminality and war, and Man and civilization
will not endure.

Of all our technical skills, such differentiation ranks the
highest since, failing, no other skill can continue, as the
base on which it operates-civilization-will not be here to
continue it.

Do not smash the social personality-and do not fail to
render powerless the anti-social in their efforts to harm
the rest of us.

Just because a man rises above his fellows or takes an
important part does not make him an anti-social
personality. Just because a man can control or dominate
others does not make him an anti-social personality.

It is his motives in doing so and the consequences of his
acts which distinguish the anti-social from the social.

Unless we realize and apply the true characteristics of the
two types of personality, we will continue to live in a
quandary of who our enemies are and, in doing so, victimize
our friends.

All men have committed acts of violence or omission for
which they could be censured.

In all Mankind there is not one single perfect human being.

But there are those who try to do right and those who
specialize in wrong and upon these facts and
characteristics you can know them.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:lb-r.rd.jh
Copyright  1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

93. HCOB  31 DEC 78 OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 31 DECEMBER 1978

Issue II
Remimeo
Class IV Grad
Class VI
C/Ses
Class IV Grad
Auditors
Ethics Officers


OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING

PTS situations can arise at any time during a person's
Scientology auditing or training program and must be
handled speedily and well to get the person back on his
course of auditing or training. Many preclears new to
Scientology require PTS handling as one of their first actions.

Auditing or training must not be continued over an
unhandled PTS sit as processing or study under the duress
of suppression will not produce results.

You do not go on hoping or ignore it or call it something
else or do any other action except handle. Handling PTSness
is too easy to allow for any justification or excuse for
not doing so, and the steps given below lay out the many
handlings which can be used to bring about a full
resolution of all PTSness in all pcs.

EDUCATION

A person who is PTS is often the last person to suspect it.
He may have become temporarily or momentarily so. And he
may have become so very slightly. Or he may be even PTS and
have been so for a long time. But he is nevertheless PTS
and we must educate him into the subject.

PTS C/S-1

The PTS C/S-1, given in HCOB 31 Dec 78 III EDUCATING THE POTENTIAL
TROUBLE SOURCE, THE FIRST STEP TOWARD HANDLING: PTS C/S-1
must be done before any other PTS handling is begun.

This action sets a person up to understand his PTS sit and
the mechanics of it. A thorough PTS C/S-1 is the basis of
all successful PTS handling.

PTS INTERVIEW

A metered PTS interview per HCOB 24 Apr 72 1, C/S Series
79, PTS INTERVIEWS or a &quot;10 August handling&quot; per HCOB 10
Aug 73 PTS HANDLING done by an auditor in session or an
MAA, D of P or SSO will, in most cases, assist the person
to spot the antagonistic or SP element. Once spotted, the
potential trouble source can be assisted in working out a
handling for that terminal, or more rarely, in deciding to
disconnect from that person.

(If all difficulty is encountered on this step, or if the
SP cannot easily be found. the preclear or student is
probably not PTS Type I and should be turned over to an
auditor qualified to handle Type II PTS situations with
more advanced PTS tech.)


HANDLING

Once the antagonistic terminal has been located, a handling
is done to move the PTS person from effect to slight gentle
cause over his situation. This handling will include
whatever is needed to accomplish the result, and will, of
course, vary depending on the person and his circumstances.

A good roads, good weather approach to the antagonistic
terminal is usually what is needed. The handling must be
agreed upon by the potential trouble source and the person
assisting him and must be tailored to put the person at
cause over his particular situation.

Handling may include coaching him along to see how he
himself actually precipitated the PTS condition in the
first place by not applying or by misapplying Scientology
basics to his life and relationship with the now
antagonistic terminal, per BPL 5 Apr 72RC PTS TYPE A HANDLING.

(Additional references:
HCOB 10 Aug 73. PTS HANDLING
HCOB 24 Apr 72 1, C/S Series 79, PTS INTERVIEWS
HCOB 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY
PROBLEMS OF WORK. Chapter 6, Affinity, Reality and Communication
BTB 11 Nov 77 Reiss. 10 Dec 77 HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS.)


WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY?

It quite often happens that the persons antagonistic to the
preclear have no real concept of what Scientology is. This
can also be true of a very new Scientologist who then
misinforms others.

The book WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY? is a very useful tool. The
preclear can send a copy of it to persons antagonistic to
him and it will give them hope that the person will respond
better to life or if they are antagonistic to Scientology
can show them what they're being antagonistic to.

Recommendations that the PTS person obtain and use this
book (or anyone else who wants to inform his friends or get
them on the right road, as the book was not written for the
purpose of de-PTSing people) should be made by the
interviewing officer. The book was specially priced so it
would be more generally available despite the high cost of
publishing. It is a large and imposing book and contains
the true answers to all the questions people might ask and
so saves the PTS person or any other person a great deal of
explanation time.

It is quite a formidable weapon when used in that fashion
besides being a good book that Scientologists should own in
its own right.

CAN WE EVER BE FRIENDS?

Extraordinary successes in handling PTS situations with the
Can We Ever Be Friends? cassette and booklet occur when
these are used. Parents, friends, relatives of
Scientologists, who, due to misunderstoods or
misinformation thought they were opposed to Scientology and
its aims have discovered, after listening to this cassette,
that they are in full agreement with it and now give
Scientology their support. This action is vital and must
not be omitted.

The results available with this cassette cannot be
underestimated. It can be used by itself when communication
has really broken down between the two terminals or in
conjunction with other PTS handling.


PROGRAM

As a result of interview and the various actions connected
with it as given above and in the referenced issues the
interviewer must give the person a program to be done by
the person.

If the person does not do the program or report his actions
on it, or the program results in no real change in the
situation the interviewing officer must require the person
to have auditing on the subject. (Ruds can be flown and/or
a PTS RD must be given by a qualified auditor in the HGC.)

Clears and OTs can have ruds flown and can do all the PTS
RD except engram handling.

This is usually followed by a Suppressed Person RD.


RUDIMENTS

Flying ruds and overts Triple or Quad Flow on the
antagonistic terminal is often done to &quot;get ruds in&quot; and
enable the pc to better confront the PTS situation he is
faced with. This would of course, be done only in session
by a qualified auditor when so ordered by the Case Supervisor.


THE PTS RUNDOWN

The PTS Rundown is done when preclears who have had
standard, successful PTS handlings roller-coaster at a
later date, become ill, slump after making gains, or
continue to find additional terminals they are PTS to.

The PTS Rundown handles a more expanded sector of a pc's
PTSness and is run to the end phenomena of a pc who is
getting and keeping case gains and never again roller-coasters.

Note: Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears are not run on the
Dianetic section of the PTS Rundown.

References:
HCOB 9 Dec 71 RC Rev. 8 Dec 78 PTS RUNDOWN
HCOB 20 Jan 72R Rev. 8 Dec 78 PTS RUNDOWN ADDITION
HCOB 17 Apr 72, C/S Series 76, C/SING A PTS RUNDOWN
HCOB 3 Jun 72RA Rev. 8 Dec 78 PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP


SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN

This rundown is beautifully simple and magically effective.
It can be done with great success on all PTS persons of any
case level, from those just beginning their first auditing
to Clears, OTs and Dianetic Clears.

The end phenomena of this handling is a miraculous
restoration of communication between the estranged
terminals originated by the formerly antagonistic person.
(Reference: HCOB 29 Dec 78 THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN)


REST, QUIET AND A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

Rest. quiet and a safe environment must be provided for a
person who has become PTS Type Three.

&quot;In this case, the Type Two's apparent SP is spread all
over the world and is often more than all the people there
are-for the person sometimes has ghosts about him or demons
and they are just more apparent SPs but imaginary as beings
as well.&quot;

&quot;. . . Removed from apparent SPs, kept in a quiet
surroundings, not pestered or threatened or put in fear,
the person comes up to Type Two and a Search and Discovery
should end the matter.&quot;

(HCOB 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY)

These are powerful and precision tools. With them we can
handle our PTS students, preclears and staffs and get
resounding one-for-one successes.

I am counting on you to do this.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:clh
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

94. HCOB  24 NOV 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 24 NOVEMBER 1965

Remimeo
Required for
Level IV Students
To Review Auditors


LEVEL IV

SEARCH AND DISCOVERY


Prerequisite: A Knowledge of Ethics

Definitions and Purposes.

The process called Search and Discovery requires as well a
good knowledge of Ethics.

One must know what a SUPPRESSIVE PERSON is, what a
POTENTIAL TROUBLE

SOURCE is and the mechanism of how and why a case Roller
Coasters and what that is. All this data exists in Ethics
policy letters and should be studied well before one
attempts a &quot;Search and Discovery&quot; or further study of this
HCOB. Ethics is not merely a legal action-it handles the
whole phenomena of case worsening (Roller Coaster) after
processing and without this technology an auditor easily
becomes baffled and tends to plunge and squirrel. The only
reason a case Roller Coasters after good standard auditing
is the PTS phenomena and a Suppressive is present.

THREE TYPES

There are Three Types of PTS.

Type One is the easy one. The SP on the case is right in
present time, actively suppressing the person.

Type Two is harder for the apparent Suppressive Person in
present time is only a restimulator for the actual suppressive.

Type Three is beyond the facilities of orgs not equipped
with hospitals as these are entirely psychotic.

HANDLING TYPE ONE PTS

The Type One is normally handled by an Ethics Officer in
the course of a hearing.

The person is asked if anyone is invalidating him or his
gains or Scientology and if the pc answers with a name and
is then told to handle or disconnect from that person the
good indicators come in promptly and the person is quite
satisfied.

If however there is no success in finding the SP on the
case or if the person starts naming Org personnel or other
unlikely persons as SP the Ethics Officer must realize that
he is handling a Type Two PTS and, because the Auditing
will consume time, sends the person to Tech or Qual for a
Search and Discovery.

It is easy to tell a Type One PTS from a Type Two. The Type
One brightens up at once and ceases to Roller Coaster the
moment the present time SP is spotted. The pc ceases to
Roller Coaster. The pc does not go back on it and begin to
beg off. The pc does not begin to worry about the consequences 
of disconnection. If the pc does any of these things, then the 
pc is a Type Two.

It can be seen that Ethics handles the majority of PTSs in
a fast manner. There is no trouble about it. All goes smoothly.

It can also be seen that Ethics cannot afford the time to
handle a Type Two PTS and there is no reason the Type Two
should not pay well for the Auditing.

Therefore, when Ethics finds its Type One approach does not
work quickly, Ethics must send the person to the proper
division that is handling Search and Discovery.

TYPE TWO

The pc who isn't sure, won't disconnect, or still Roller
Coasters, or who doesn't brighten up, can't name any SP at
all, is a Type Two.

Only Search and Discovery will help.

SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

The first thing to know is that CASE WORSENING IS CAUSED
ONLY BY A PTS SITUATION.

There never will be any other reason.

As soon as you doubt this datum and think about &quot;other
causes&quot; or try to explain it some other way you no longer
prevent cases from worsening and no longer rescue those who
have worsened.

The second thing to know is that A SUPPRESSIVE IS ALWAYS A
PERSON, A BEING OR A GROUP OF BEINGS. A suppressive is not a
condition, a problem, a postulate.

Problems and Counter-Postulates come into the matter but
the SP as a being or group must always be located as a
being or a group, not as merely an idea. As the technology
is close to and similar to that of a service facsimile, a
poorly trained auditor can get confused between them and
produce a condition he says is the cause. Persons who
cannot confront and who therefore see persons as ideas not
people are the ones most likely to fail in doing Search and
Discovery.

The third thing to know is that there can be an actual SP
and another person or being similar to the actual one who
is only an apparent SP.

An actual SP actually suppresses another.

An apparent SP only reminds the pc of the actual one and so
is restimulated into being a PTS.

The actual SP can be in present time (Type One PTS) or is
in the past or distant (Type Two PTS).

The Type Two always has an apparent SP who is not the SP on
the case, is confusing the two and is acting PTS only
because of restimulation, not because of suppression.

Search and Discovery as a process is done exactly by the
general rules of listing. One lists for persons or groups
who are or have suppressed the pc. The list is complete
when only one item reads on nulling and this is the item.

If the item turns out to be a group, one does a second list
of who or what would represent that group, gets the list
long enough to leave on nulling only one item reading, and
that is the SP.

An incident is not a person or a group.

A condition is not a person or a group. And a group is not
a person, what you want is one being.

The E-Meter signs are unmistakable and the good indicators
come in strongly when the actual SP is found.

This is the entire action. It is liable to the various ills
and errors of writing and nulling a list, such as
overlisting, underlisting, ARC Breaking the pc by
by-passing the item or getting an incomplete list. These
are avoided by knowing one's business as an Auditor and
being able to handle an E-Meter with skill and confidence.

When one goofs on a Search and Discovery and finds the
wrong actual SP the signs are the same as those where a
Type Two is handled as a Type One-not sure, no good
indicators, Roller Coasters again, etc.

The actual SP can be back track but it is seldom vital to
go far out of PT and usual for a lifetime person to turn up.

Done correctly the pc's good indicators come in at once,
the pc cognites, the meter reacts very well with Blowdowns
and repeated long falls, and the pc ceases to Roller Coaster.

Care should be taken not to get too enthusiastic in going
far back track on the pc as you run into whole track
implants etc, easily handleable only at Level V. The pc can
get &quot;over whumped&quot; if you go too far back and you'll wish
you hadn't. This normally happens however, only when the pc
has been ARC Broken by the Auditor, when the right item has
been by-passed and the list is overlong, or when 2 or 3
items are still reading on the list (incomplete list).

Locating a Service Facsimile is quite similar to Search and
Discovery but they are different processes entirely.

Only the doingness is similar. In Search and Discovery the
end product is a being. In Service Facsimile the end
product is an item or concept or idea. Don't get the two mixed.

HANDLING TYPE THREE

The Type Three PTS is mostly in institutions or would be.

In this case the Type Two's apparent SP is spread all over
the world and is often more than all the people there
are-for the person sometimes has ghosts about him or demons
and they are just more apparent SPs but imaginary as beings
as well.

All institutional cases are PTSs. The whole of insanity is
wrapped up in this one fact.

The insane is not just a bad off being, the insane is a
being who has been overwhelmed by an actual SP until too
many persons are apparent SPs. This makes the person Roller
Coaster continually in life. The Roller Coaster is even
cyclic (repetitive as a cycle).

Handling an insane person as a Type Two might work but
probably not case for case.

One might get enough wins on a few to make one fail
completely by so many loses on the many.

Just as you tell a Type Two to disconnect from the actual
SP (wherever found on the track) you must disconnect the
person from the environment.

Putting the person in a current institution puts him in a
Bedlam. And when also &quot;treated&quot; it may finish him. For he
will Roller Coaster from any treatment given, until made
into a Type Two and given a Search and Discovery.

The task with a Type Three is not treatment as such. It is
to provide a relatively safe environment and quiet and rest
and no treatment of a mental nature at all. Giving him a
quiet court with a motionless object in it might do the
trick if he is permitted to sit there unmolested.

Medical care of a very unbrutal nature is necessary as
intravenous feeding and soporifics (sleeping and quietening
drugs) may be necessary, such persons are sometimes also
physically ill from an illness with a known medical cure.

Treatment with drugs, shock, operation is just more
suppression. The person will not really get well, will
relapse, etc.

Standard Auditing on such a person is subject to the Roller
Coaster phenomena. They get worse after getting better.
&quot;Successes&quot; are sporadic, enough to lead one on, and
usually worsen again since these people are PTS.

But removed from apparent SPs, kept in a quiet
surroundings, not pestered or threatened or put in fear,
the person comes up to Type Two and a Search and Discovery
should end the matter. But there will always be some
failures as the insane sometimes withdraw into rigid
unawareness as a final defense, sometimes can't be kept
alive and sometimes are too hectic and distraught to ever
become quiet, the extremes of too quiet and never quiet
have a number of psychiatric names such as &quot;catatonia&quot;
(withdrawn totally) and &quot;manic&quot; (too hectic).

Classification is interesting but non-productive since they
are all PTS, all will Roller Coaster and none can be
trained or processed with any idea of lasting result no
matter the temporary miracle.

Remove a Type Three PTS from the environment, give him or
her rest and quiet, do a Search and Discovery when rest and
quiet have made the person Type Two.

(Note: These paragraphs on the Type Three make good a
promise given in Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental
Health to develop &quot;Institutional Dianetics&quot;.)

The modern mental hospital with its brutality and
suppressive treatments is not the way to give a psychotic
quiet and rest. Before anything effective can be done in
this field a proper institution would have to be provided,
offering only rest, quiet and medical assistance for
intravenous feedings and sleeping draughts where necessary
but not as &quot;treatment&quot; and where no treatment is attempted
until the person looks recovered and only then a Search and
Discovery as above under Type Two.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:ep.cden
Copyright 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

95. HCOB  21 JAN 66 S &amp; D ERRORS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 21 JANUARY 1966

Remimeo

SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

(ETHICS TYPE CASES, PTSs)

S &amp; D ERRORS

(Handling PTSs with S &amp; D)


When you have a failed Search and Discovery, the following
are incorrect or have been omitted:

1. Incorrect item (errors in listing or assessment, over or
under listing, bad metering, poor question).

2. Person has not actually been made to disconnect from the
SP by declaration in writing.

3. It was really an ARC Break, not an SP and ARC Breaks
should have been looked for instead of SPs.

4. The SP found was refused by the Auditor or Ethics.

The golden rule of S &amp; D also applies-if it isn't the
correct person or group that was &quot;found&quot; the good
indicators won't come in.

So any incorrectly done S &amp; D (as above) will not result in
a pc bright-eyed and bushy tailed. All S &amp; Ds correctly
done on a pc that is PTS result in remarkable recoveries
magical to see. So don't blame S &amp; D if it &quot;fails&quot;. Blame
the lack of skill in using it and the person who ordered it
or did it should be retrained.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:ml.cden
Copyright 1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

96. HCOB   5 FEB 66 S AND D WARNING


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 5 FEBRUARY 1966

Remimeo
Tech Div Hats
HGC Auditors
Qual Div Staff Level III
Franchise

S AND D WARNING


Search and Discovery, done incorrectly (incorrect SP found)
can make a preclear ill within a week or two after.

Assessment is a very proper skill. There is a great deal
written on it and many tapes.

The common errors of assessment (aside from the usual Gross
Auditing Errors) are: 1. Too short a list

2. Too long a list

3. Clumsy or improper meter handling

4. List getting suppressed

5. Item getting invalidated

6. Pc being allowed too much Itsa

7. Pc getting ARC Broken by under or over-listing

8. Auditor not letting the pc have his item

9. Whole list going live because the item was by-passed
earlier on the list 10. Auditor not looking for good and
bad indicators to see if he was correct in his assessment.

When the right SP is found the good indicators flood in and
the pc does not cave in in 36 to 72 hours.

The bug in S &amp; D is that one can almost get the right item.
An item can be found that is nearly the right one. If the
nearly right one is accepted the pc will be doubtfully more
cheerful and may insist this is it. The pc however is still
not quite sure. Inevitably that is the sign of a nearly
right item.

The real reaction to the correct person is an &quot;Of Course!&quot;
no doubt about it reaction.

It is the action of nearly finding the right one that may
make the pc ill in the next few days or a week. One has
restimulated the by-passed charge of the right one without
finding it.

Remember that the real Suppressive Person (SP) was the one
that wove a dangerous environment around the pc. To find
that person is to open up the pc's present time perception
or space. It's like pulling a wrapping of wool off the pc.

The SP persuaded or caused the pc to believe the
environment was dangerous and that it was always dangerous
and so made the pc pull in and occupy less space and reach
less.

When the SP is really located and indicated the pc feels
this impulse not to reach diminish and so his space opens up.

The difference between a safe environment and a dangerous
environment is only that a person is willing to reach and
expand in a safe environment and reaches less and contracts
in a dangerous environment.

An SP wants the other person to reach less. Sometimes this
is done by forcing the person to reach into danger and get
hurt so that the person will thereafter reach less.

The SP wants smaller, less powerful beings. The SP thinks
that if another became powerful that one would attack the SP.

The SP is totally insecure and is battling constantly in
covert ways to make others less powerful and less able.

Scientology flies into the teeth of an SP. One will go to
the most extraordinary lengths to try to injure
Scientologists or an organization or a staff member.

But SPs existed long before Scientology and finding the
basic SP around the pc just because of Scientology or the
pc is a Scientologist is in actual fact unlikely.

Childhood is the most fertile area in which to locate the
SP on the case. A child is weak and at the mercy of adults.
It is this fact alone that gave all the cures Freud ever
stumbled onto.

The analyst accidentally located an SP when his work was
successful. But then he proceeded to overrun and
restimulate the patient without erasing. In other words he
would not let the patient have his item. An hour with a
meter in the hands of an expert auditor who can assess
correctly will produce everything the analyst or Freud ever
hoped to achieve and will do it invariably compared to the
small results analysts did achieve.

But if you get one almost right, and not get the really
correct SP, then you get the same phenomena that dogged the
analyst-the pc gets better for a moment and collapses.

I am not saying you can permanently injure persons. The
analyst techniques operated far more restimulatively than
our S &amp; D. They made the person talk about it for years!
But you can still give a pc a nasty cold if you miss on an
S &amp; D.

So don't miss.

Do it correctly.

Find the correct SP.

It's all correct if you assess by the book-complete list,
not too long or too short. Correct item on the list. Good
indicators then in. And no relapse for at least 2 weeks.

That's how a real S &amp; D is done.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH : ml.rd
Copyright  1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

97. HCOB  28 JAN 66 S AND D DATA, HOW A SUPPRESSIVE BECOMES ONE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JANUARY 1966

Remimeo
Tech Hats
Qual Hats 
All students

(Edited from a taped Conference with
Saint Hill Tech and Qual Personnel
-20 Dec 1965)

LEVEL IV

SEARCH AND DISCOVERY DATA

HOW A SUPPRESSIVE BECOMES ONE

Search and Discovery is being made and auditors are finding
on one person and another &quot;Myself&quot;. Well, just amongst us
girls, of course, you are going to find it. One of the best
reasons you are going to find it is that it is part of the
R6 bank. The other reason you are going to find it is that
after a person is totally overwhelmed by a Suppressive he
assumes the valence of the Suppressive. And a person you
would find that on has actually been pretty suppressive.

What you're doing is, you are pushing S &amp; D to a point
where you are clearing suppression. It wasn't intended to
go that far.

If you were to ask the listing question however, &quot;Name
'Myself'&quot; or &quot;Give 'Myself' a name&quot;, you would then get the
Suppressive.

But this is getting very adventurous, because it is part of
the R6 bank. It is getting very adventurous to do anything
about it. We seem to be happy about having &quot;Myself&quot;. I
would just let them go right on being happy about it. With
skill you probably could bring out the identity of this
person whose valence had come over them. It would all
depend on the auditor who is doing it. If I were doing it,
I'd go ahead and break it down. But not a Class III auditor
who is not sure what he is going up against, who is
repeating the word several times, repeating the question,
trying to check it to make sure the listing question is
clean. Don't you see, you are never going to get that
listing question clean. That I assure you. That question
can't be listed out.

That is the mechanism of suppression overwhelming a person.
Oddly enough you will only find it on persons who are
suppressive and of course you've walked into the real
mechanism of how does a Suppressive become a Suppressive?
He becomes a Suppressive by taking over the valence of a
Suppressive.

Then when you list it out you get &quot;Myself&quot; and this is
compounded by the fact that it's part of the R6 bank so you
don't dare do much with it but it will let a bunch of steam
off the case.

With some very, very, very, very upstage auditing, very
careful indeed, give them the auditing question once, then
say, &quot;Go on and answer the question&quot; but never repeat it,
never check the thing to find out if it's a clean list-you
probably would get at least one recent SP out of that
combination. How we do that at that stage when I've not
worked with it technically I would not be able to tell you,
but I just know that it would be very risky. It makes me
feel like maybe I shouldn't do anything about it at all
because it's too risky, but I can see somebody getting
messed up.


THE MAIN TROUBLE IN S &amp; D

Your main trouble in S &amp; D is much worse than that-it is
simply an inability to assess.

And auditors since time immemorial have had trouble
assessing. They have two troubles in assessing. They
underlist and they overlist. It's almost an accident that
an auditor ever lists the right lists the right way. I'm
not saying that sarcastically but it has been my experience
in teaching auditors to assess that they have two faults,
they underlist and they overlist.

If they do either one of these things, they are going to
ARC Break the pc and then the list isn't going to be
nullable because the pc is not responding to the auditor's
voice as well, and it quite often was the first one on the
list which is where they never looked. More fundamental
than that is simply the problem of reading an E-Meter.
Those technical facts are in the road of S &amp; D.

ASSESSING AN S &amp; D

Actually an auditor who can assess can pass off an S &amp; D so
fast it would be like dealing cards done by a Monte Carlo
Vingt-et-Un player; he could just roll them off left, right
and centre. There's no real trouble in it. It's a very fast
action. It all depends on how much you want to keep the pc
under tension in the action, because an assessment isn't
auditing to begin with.

You would start Session with, &quot;Sit down, I'm going to
assess you now. Do you have some answers to this question.
Brr. Brr. Brr.&quot; And the pc says, &quot;I want to tell you about
...&quot; &quot;All right, good, I'm glad you're going to tell me
about that but right now I want some answers to this
question.&quot; See? Then &quot;brrrrr&quot; on down and then you'll
notice your needle relax. Then you say, &quot;All right, now I'm
going through this list.&quot; Ratatat, etc. &quot;That's it, all
right. Thanks very much.&quot; Pc cognites 10 minutes. Pc
cognites and the Meter blows up and good indicators come
in, and you've done an S &amp; D. There is nothing more
complicated than that.

You've got auditors who were trying to do an S &amp; D in a
session. You got them that are afraid the pc has already
given it on the list. You got them that haven't learned how
the Meter reacts when you've got a complete list. (A Meter
just falls flat when you've got a complete list.

The needle goes clean.) And you've got them that aren't
sure that they've got any SP, and they just didn't see that
the Meter did a surge on one of them. Then you get somebody
who has overlisted and he's just ploughed the guy in, so he
can't assess it back easily.

Then you get the fellow who had four of them fall.
Certainly if you've got four falling there's two things
that can be wrong at this point which makes it very
difficult to run back. In one you have passed it. It's
above the four which are falling. You've missed it, and the
pc is simply discharging on it. And actually you can ask
the pc which one was it and he'll say, &quot;Well, it was Joe,
of course.&quot; That's above the four. Practically every one
after the right one will read, because it's actually
blowing down all the time. He's no longer paying any
attention to the auditor.

Then the other thing is you just haven't completed the list.

You have to make an opinion as to whether or not you've
overlisted or underlisted. You can also pick up a dirty
needle and an ARC Broken pc or protesty pc if you've gone
by the right one.

Here are the evils of listing, and here are the evils of
assessment showing up on S &amp; D.

They are simply auditor goofs-it's just lack of experience
on the part of the auditor and lack of understanding of
what he's supposed to be doing. But an auditor who can
really assess can knock these things off. I'd spot what
auditors can assess reliably, and I'd give them specialized
jobs of that character that require listing. This is a
very, very highly skilled action. You save a lot of time by
pulling such an auditor back into specialty.

REVIEW ACTION

In Review you have to do it sometimes when it's been done.
So you have the additional answer of &quot;How do you patch up
an assessment that's already been goofed?&quot; And &quot;Where is
the list that was lost?&quot; You've got the problem of the list
that was completed out of session.

&quot;And I got home and was lying in bed . . .&quot; and so forth.
So in Review you always assume the pc continued the list
after the session. If the pc is there as a flat ball
bearing, you just automatically assume the pc thought of it
afterwards or something. It isn't that the Tech auditor
always got it.

I'll give you a tip in Qual. If you assume automatically
that standard technology has not been applied, as your
first gambit, in anybody that you're putting back together
again, you'll about 99% be right. Somehow or other it
slipped by in Tech. It slipped by. Somebody thought he did
it. Somebody thought it was on the report. And therefore it
looked like it didn't work or something. Something was
there. And in all of my D of Ping I have not found it
possible to detect all departures from tech by auditors.
I've never been able to bat 1000 on that. Naturally, it's
nearly impossible.

Technically, what you have to do doesn't mean that you have
to invent technology because there are very standard
answers to all these things.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:ml.rd
Copyright  1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

98. HCOB  10 JUN 66 S &amp; D-THE MISSED ITEM


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1966
Issue II

Remimeo
Tech Div Hats
HGC Auditors
Qual Div Staff

S &amp; D-THE MISSED ITEM

There are four points I want to get across to you.

1. ILLNESS = ONLY PTS

2. ONLY PTS = ILLNESS

3. ONLY A PTS CONDITION CAN MAKE A GRADE V (or any grade) SICK

4. A BAD S &amp; D MAKES A PERSON SICK

Get it? GOOD!!

Now, if a person who has had an S &amp; D gets sick, what do
you know? You know that: (a) They are a PTS

(b) The S &amp; D was not properly done

(c) An item was missed

NOTE: The missed item may be on a list that was made 2 or 3
years ago.

On the HCO B 5th February 1966 &quot;S &amp; D WARNING&quot;, I clearly
stated that &quot;It is the action of nearly finding the right
one that may make the pc ill&quot;. One has restimulated the
charge of the RIGHT item, but, has found and okayed the
WRONG item.

A bad S&amp;D is DEADLY.

A bad S &amp; D can cause a dangerous physical condition. A bad
S &amp; D can land a pc in hospital (I know of two such cases
where it did).

So please! PLEASE!! get this, it is so very important.
Always, repeat, ALWAYS look for the MISSED item on a
priorly done list when the pc gets sick.

Know your S &amp; D bulletins, know your listing and nulling
bulletin-THOROUGHLY- and you won't go wrong.

Let's fix up roller coasters, not help keep them roller coasting.

IT'S VERY EASY.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:lb-r.cden 
Copyright  1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

99. HCOB  13 JAN 68 S &amp; Ds


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 13 JANUARY 1968

Remimeo

S &amp; Ds

There are three types of S &amp; D (Search and Discovery).
These are used to nullify the influence of Suppressive
persons or things on a case so the person will be able to
be processed and will no longer be PTS (a Potential Trouble
Source). People who are PTS became that way because of
suppression by persons or objects. Insanity is also
remediable by S &amp; Ds where the person can be processed.

These are all LISTING processes and if the auditor is not
well-trained and good at the technology of listing, not
only will no good result occur but the pc (given a wrong
item, overlisted or underlisted, or audited over an ARC
Break or PTP) can be made ill.

Pcs who become ill are always to a greater or lesser degree PTS.

These questions should not be shown to a pc as they may
start him self-listing.

The &quot;type&quot; is determined by the 1st letter of the key word
in the listing question.

S &amp; D TYPE U

&quot;Who or what has attempted to unmock you?&quot;

Where this does not communicate, use &quot;Who or what has tried
to make nothing out of you?&quot; A very bad off case may
respond best to &quot;Who or what has unmocked you?&quot; This
(above) is the standard and most used S &amp; D.

S &amp; D TYPE S

&quot;Who or what are you trying to stop?&quot;

This works on all cases to a greater or lesser degree. It
is particularly useful on a case that is giving a great
deal of trouble, gets small reads or is rather suppressive.
This should work on the insane also as the point where a q
n (thetan) becomes insane is the point where he begins to
generally stop things. I looked for years for the exact
point where a q n ceased to be sane and became insane on
any given subject and fmally found that it was the exact
moment he became dedicated to trying to stop whatever it was.

S &amp; D TYPE W

&quot;Who or what are you trying to withdraw from?&quot;

This is the action after a failure to stop has occurred.

In administering these, the best order would be Type W,
Type S and then Type U, if you are going to give them all
to the same pc in a row.

Any or all can be given to the same pc.

S &amp; Ds can be given more than once to the same pc.

Properly listed the results are magical. If they are not
magical, then listing tech is badly out and should be
restudied from ALL materials and tapes on the subject.

Errors are located and repaired by the recent new L4A (HCOB
of 9 January 1968).

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jp.cden 
Copyright 1968 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

100. HCOB 19 JAN 68 S &amp; Ds BY BUTTON


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 19 JANUARY 1968

Remimeo

S &amp; Ds

S &amp; Ds BY BUTTON

The most certain way to handle a pc with an S &amp; D is to
assess for the type to give first.

With the pc on the meter, say, &quot;Unmock&quot; (or &quot;Make nothing
of&quot;) &quot;Stop&quot; &quot;Withdraw from&quot; &quot;Suppress&quot; &quot;Invalidate&quot; (or any
of the buttons used in old Problems Intensives). Then take
the one that read largest and put it in the Question &quot;Who
or what has attempted to________you?&quot; or &quot;Who or what are
you trying to_______?&quot;

When you have listed the question and found the item and
given it to the pc, you can take the above list, with the
one used omitted, and take the largest read now on the
remaining words and put that in the question and get
another item for it.

So long as you can get one of the buttons to read, you can
get an item by doing an S &amp; D with it.

CAUTION: Do not continue to do S &amp; Ds beyond a floating needle.

CAUTION: Do not list an S &amp; D button if the question for
the list does not read.

S &amp; Ds BY ASSESSMENT FOR QUESTION

You can also do an S &amp; D by assessing for a button to use
in an S &amp; D question.

This is done by asking the question:

&quot;What are they trying to do to you?&quot;

Get the pc to list it, find the item and then use it in an
S &amp; D question.

This works on any case but always works best on cases that
haven't responded to S &amp; Ds previously.

Fit the resulting item in the question &quot;Who or what is
trying to______you?&quot; PURPOSE S &amp; Ds

A Purpose S &amp; D By Assessment for Question can be done by
first listing &quot;What are you trying to do?&quot; or &quot;What have
you tried to do?&quot; You test these two questions for the
largest read, then you list the one that reads best.

When you have the item of &quot;What are you trying to do&quot; or
&quot;What have you tried to do&quot; you fit it into the S &amp; D
Question &quot;Who or what have you failed to_______(item
found)?&quot; or &quot;Who or what have you tried to_______?&quot;, the
two questions tested for largest read and then listed for
an item.



CAUTION: The question must make sense and be answerable.
Don't change the wording of the item. Change the question
into a sensible one.

This form of S &amp; D can give an Effect question as the only
possible question.

If the item found on the first list &quot; trying to do&quot; won't
word causative, word it by effect-&quot;Who or what has tried to
you?&quot;

The whole attempt of this S &amp; D is to find the person or
thing that has blunted the purpose of the pc.

--------------

All these S &amp; Ds do not set aside the standard S &amp; D Types
W, S and U. &quot;Type U&quot; is the basic S &amp; D. They are for use
mainly when the pc has had a long Review history or a bad
Ethics history, or is insane or suppressive. BUT using them
does not evaluate the pc as down tone. They give rather
magical effects on anyone.

The Purpose S &amp; D is from earlier research and is very
magical on Artists. It has the liability of having to be
done sensibly, being a sort of goals assessment plus an S &amp; D.

Sometimes the goals assessment (&quot;What are you trying to
do&quot;) is magical enough to produce a floating needle. If so,
don't ever go past it to the second question that uses the
goal.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:jp.cden Founder
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

101. HCOB 19 NOV 78 L &amp; N LISTS - THE ITEM &quot;ME&quot;


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 19 NOVEMBER 1978

Auditors
Class IV
and above 
C/Ses
Class IV
and above 

URGENT-IMPORTANT

L &amp; N LISTS - THE ITEM &quot;ME&quot;


RULE: THE ITEM &quot;ME&quot; MUST BE ACCEPTED ON ANY S &amp; D LIST.

RULE: THE ITEM &quot;ME&quot; MUST NEVER BE REPRESENTED.

The item &quot;Me&quot; on an L &amp; N list must be accepted as the
item, as it is basically the only right item there could be
for an identity or valence list.

The item &quot;Me&quot; often appears on S &amp; D lists, or similar L &amp;
N lists which ask for an identity or valence. If it is not
accepted, or if it is represented, it will really mess up
the case.

(This includes the pronouns, &quot;myself,&quot; and &quot;I.&quot;)

The right thing to do when the pc gives this item, is to
accept it as the item for the list, and do not continue
that list or take any further action with that item.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:dm.clb
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

102. HCOB 14 OCT 68 r. 1 Jan 76 THE AUDITOR'S CODE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1968R
REVISED 1 JANUARY 1976

Remimeo
Auditor 43
Class VIII


THE AUDITOR'S CODE

In celebration of the 100% gains attainable by Standard Tech.

I hereby promise as an Auditor to follow the Auditor's Code.

1. I promise not to evaluate for the preclear or tell him
what he should think about his case in session.

2. I promise not to invalidate the preclear's case or gains
in or out of session.

3. I promise to administer only Standard Tech to a preclear
in the standard way.

4. I promise to keep all auditing appointments once made.

5. I promise not to process a preclear who has not had
sufficient rest and who is physically tired.

6. I promise not to process a preclear who is improperly
fed or hungry.

7. I promise not to permit a frequent change of Auditors.

8. I promise not to sympathize with a preclear but to be effective.

9. I promise not to let the preclear end session on his own
determinism but to finish off those cycles I have begun.

10. I promise never to walk off from a preclear in session.

11. I promise never to get angry with a preclear in session.

12. I promise to run every major case action to a floating needle.

13. I promise never to run any one action beyond its
floating needle.

14. I promise to grant beingness to the preclear in session.

15. I promise not to mix the processes of Scientology with
other practices except when the preclear is physically ill
and only medical means will serve.

16. I promise to maintain Communication with the preclear
and not to cut his comm or permit him to overrun in session.

17. I promise not to enter comments, expressions or
enturbulence into a session that distract a preclear from
his case.

18. I promise to continue to give the preclear the process
or auditing command when needed in the session.

19. I promise not to let a preclear run a wrongly
understood command.

20. I promise not to explain, justify or make excuses in
session for any Auditor mistakes whether real or imagined.

21. I promise to estimate the current case state of a
preclear only by Standard Case Supervision data and not to
diverge because of some imagined difference in the case.

22. I promise never to use the secrets of a preclear
divulged in session for punishment or personal gain.

23. I promise to see that any fee received for processing
is refunded following the policies of the Claims
Verification Board, if the preclear is dissatisfied and
demands it within three months after the processing, the
only condition being that he may not again be processed or
trained.

24. I promise not to advocate Scientology only to cure
illness or only to treat the insane, knowing well it was
intended for spiritual gain.

25. I promise to cooperate fully with the legal
organizations of Dianetics and Scientology as developed by
L. Ron Hubbard in safeguarding the ethical use and practice
of the subject according to the basics of Standard Tech.

26. I promise to refuse to permit any being to be
physically injured, violently damaged, operated on or
killed in the name of &quot;mental treatment&quot;.

27. I promise not to permit sexual liberties or violation
of the mentally unsound.

28. I promise to refuse to admit to the ranks of
practitioners any being who is insane.

Auditor:__________________________

Date: ____________________________

Witness: Place: ___________________________

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt.rd
Copyright  1968, 1976
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


**************

103. HCOB 26 NOV 63 A NEW TRIANGLE: BASIC AUDITING, TECHNIQUE, CASE ANALYSIS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 26 NOVEMBER 1963

Central Orgs
Franchise

ALL LEVELS

STAR RATING

A NEW TRIANGLE

BASIC AUDITING, TECHNIQUE, CASE ANALYSIS


All processing can be broken down into three separate parts
for any level of auditing.

These three parts are: (1) BASIC AUDITING (2) TECHNIQUE and
(3) CASE ANALYSIS.

BASIC AUDITING

The handling of the pc as a being, the auditing cycle, the
meter, comprise the segment of processing known as Basic
Auditing.

If an auditor cannot handle this segment or any part of it
well, trouble will develop in the other two segments
(technique and case analysis). When technique and case
analysis seem to fail &quot;even when done by the book&quot; the
fault commonly lies in Basic Auditing. One or more of the
five faults elsewhere listed will be present and these
faults effectively prevent any technique or case analysis
from working.

Where Scientology &quot;isn't working&quot;, the wrong first places
to look are technique and case analysis. The right place to
look is Basic Auditing.

Until an auditor can handle a pc in session easily, handle
a meter smoothly and accurately and is flawless in his
auditing cycle, he or she should have no hope of making any
technique work or of analyzing any case for anything.

In smooth Basic Auditing lies the open sesame to all cases,
for only then do technique and case analysis function. The
gun barrel is Basic Auditing. Technique and Case Analysis
form the Ammunition and sight. A poor basic auditor using a
fine technique is firing ammunition with no gun. It doesn't
go anywhere.

There is a level of Basic Auditing for every level of
Scientology. At the lowest level it is only the ability to
sit and listen. It grows in complexity from there up to the
fabulous co-ordination of pc, auditing cycle and meter so
flawless that neither auditor nor pc are aware of the
presence of Basic Auditing at all, but only the actions of
the technique and the guidance of case analysis. And
between those two practices of Basic Auditing lie many
gradients.

Basic Auditing is the rock on which all gains are built.

TECHNIQUE

The techniques of Scientology are many, spread out over 13
years of development.

A technique is a process or some action that is done by
auditor and pc under the auditor's direction.

The lowest technique is the single co-audit question given
by the supervisor to let the pc Itsa. The highest is the
complex listing of goals and GPMs.

A technique is a patterned action, invariable and
unchanging, composed of certain steps or actions calculated
to bring about tone arm action and thus better or free a
thetan.

There have been thousands of techniques. Less than a
hundred, at a guess, are in common recommended use for the
various levels of auditing.

Techniques have their place in various levels of auditing
today rather than various differences of case.

As cases may be audited only at the level in which they are
trained, by modern ruling, and as several techniques exist
at each level for choice out of Case Analysis, it will be
found quite simple to select a technique and get results
with it. Safe auditing and good sense dictate such
selection and classing of techniques, and trouble only
results when someone sells himself out of his level to a
high fast flounder.

Techniques exist in tables and texts for the various levels
and it will be found that these give the best case results
applied in that way.

CASE ANALYSIS

Case Analysis establishes two things (a) What is going on
with the case and (b) What should be done with it.

Case Analysis is a new subject to auditors at this time. It
is commonly confused with techniques and the gravest fault
is treating Case Analysis as only another assessment technique.

There is a level of Case Analysis for every level or class,
to compare with the Basic Auditing and Technique of that class.

My first development in this new segment of processing was
Programming. This is the consecutive techniques or actions
a case should have to get adequate Tone Arm action and
achieve a new plateau of ability.

But Case Analysis itself has steps like (a) and (b) above.

There is also an invariable sequence of application in a
more advanced Case Analysis.

These steps should be very, very well known by a trained
auditor since all Case Analysis fits into them:

1. Discover what the pc is &quot;sitting in&quot;.

2. Have the pc detail what assumptions and considerations
he or she has had about it; and

3. Identify it fully and correctly.

The &quot;it&quot; above can be as slight as a worry, as bothersome
as a Present Time Problem or as overwhelming as a Goals
Problem Mass. Whatever &quot;it&quot; is the Case Analysis steps
would be the same.

In the first step the survey may be very brief. It should
certainly have certainty in it for the pc. It can be very
general. It can be a part of a case or a geographical
location. The pc could be clear or insane. The sequence or
the 3 steps would be the same.

The next step (2) gets the lies off, giving TA action and
thus clearing away charge for a more accurate assault in
(3). This second step can be very lengthy as in Level Two
or very brief as in OT auditing techniques. But it must
exist whether short or long. Otherwise the analysis is
heavily hindered by the lies and these will read on the
meter and upset the analysis or they will cloud the pc's
perception on which all Itsa depends. So the lies must come
off in any Case Analysis. Usually this is quite permissive
and gently done. But it can amount to also pulling missed
withholds. It all depends on the level on which the
analysis is being done and what is being analyzed. This
step (2) becomes itself a technique at lower levels. It is
just a spatter and promise at high level auditing.

The third step can be long or short but must always be
there. Here, with the charge gone in (2), the auditor and
pc can now identify the thing much better and the pc can
have a final certainty on it. Usually at lower levels, the
certainty is only that it is gone. The familiar &quot;How do you
feel about that problem now?&quot; &quot;What problem?&quot; is a lower
level result of Case Analysis. At the highest level, &quot;On
checking the meter, I find that is a wrong Item&quot; would be
the auditor's final (3) statement.

So Case Analysis at any level has as its action
establishing what the pc is in, what it has been supposed
to be and what it now is (or isn't).

Anything from a habit to a headache could be analyzed in
this way. At the lowest levels it could occupy an
intensive, at the highest levels five minutes.

ARC Break handling has been the most familiar tool of Case
Analysis.

Case Analysis handles the momentary or prolonged problem,
determines the technique to be used, and is always done
with Basic Auditing.

An auditor has three hats. One is his Basic Auditor's hat.
This he never takes off. The other two are his Technique
hat and his Case Analysis hat and these he switches back
and forth at need.

These are the three segments. Put together well, they make
successful auditing.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH :dr.rd
Copyright  1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************


