   
   CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 8/16


CLASS VIII COURSE PACK

CONTENTS:

Part 8

83. HCOB  15 NOV 78 DATING AND LOCATING
84. HCOB  22 JUL 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT
85. HCOB   5 SEP 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE
86. HCOB  30 NOV 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES
87. HCOB   6 SEP 78 R3 SC - A FULL SERV FAC HANDLING UPDATED WITH NED
88. HCOB   6 SEP 78 SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS
89. HCOB   7 JUL 64 JUSTIFICATIONS
90. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 ETHICS CHITS
91. HCOB   8 NOV 65 SUPPRESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS


**************************************************

CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 8/16

**************************************************

83. HCOB  15 NOV 78 DATING AND LOCATING


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1978

C/Ses
Tech/Qual
Auditors
Class IV 


DATING AND LOCATING

(Reference:
Book: AXIOMS AND LOGICS
Book: THE BOOK OF E-METER DRILLS EM DRILL 22, E-METER HIDDEN DATE;,
THIS LIFE EM DRILL 25 TRACK DATING
HCOB 4 Aug 63 ALL ROUTINES, E-METER ERRORS, COMMUNICATION CYCLE ERROR.)

Axiom 30: &quot;The general rule of auditing is that anything
which is unwanted and yet persists must be thoroughly
viewed, at which time it will vanish.&quot;

-The Axioms of Scientology

Excerpt from Axiom 38: &quot;... Truth is the exact time, place,
form and event.... Thus we see that the discovery of Truth
would bring about an As-is-ness by actual experiment.&quot;

-The Axioms of Scientology

A thetan knows that if he could remember the exact place a
thing had been generated, the exact time and the exact
conditions, and the exact person who did it, he would then
get a disappearance of the thing.

Dating is the action the auditor takes to help the pc spot
the exact time something happened.

Locating is the action the auditor takes to help the pc
spot the exact place something happened.

By dating and locating, getting the exact time and place a
specific thing happened, the pc is able to blow the mass
and energy connected with the occurrence which has hung him
up at that point.

Date/Locate, as called for in the various prepared
correction lists, is a very effective tool for the handling
of certain items found to be out on such a list. These
could be points of overrun, wins that have been bypassed or
invalidated in some way, moments of loss, trauma, painful
emotion, or any of various stuck points of this nature. It
is also used in the correction of wrong dates or wrong
locations given the pc in previous auditing.

In any of these cases the pc will be somewhat stuck at
these points, or at the very least will have some attention
units hung up at these points, and getting the exact &quot;when&quot;
and &quot;where&quot; will unstick him.

That which is viewed in its own time, place, form and event
can be as-ised.

WHY YOU DATE AND LOCATE

A person can have a wrong date for an incident, or he might
have a date totally occluded.

He might have a confusion on two incidents, thinking one
happened before the other when it is actually vice versa.
He could have two incidents collapsed into one, time-wise.
Or, more severely, he can be stuck in the time of an incident 
which acts as present time for him. In other words, that time 
is still in existence for him in PT. He is seeing things from
that point in time.

By dating it exactly you blow the stuck viewpoint in time.
You see it as a blowdown on the meter and the pc will feel
the sudden dissipation of mass.

The question might then arise: If you have dated an
incident to a &quot;blow&quot; what is there left to blow on the
Locate step? The answer is that, in addition to a stuck
viewpoint in time, a person can have a stuck viewpoint of
location.

Since he had the wrong time, he could, as well, have the
wrong location, or an occluded location, or a confusion
between two or more locations. He could be quite stuck in a
past location. That past location is still in existence for
him. The point of view from that location is still there
for him.

So you date and locate. Finding when it was and where it
was blows both the time of the incident and the place of
the incident. If he's still hung up in either of these he's
out of present time and out of present location. Getting
the precise date and location blows him out of these into
present time.

Sometimes during dating the pc spots the correct past
location simultaneously with getting the correct date, and
it (the location) then blows at the same time. The auditor
must know that this can occur and recognize when it does as
he would not then rotely try to put the pc through the
Locate steps.

DATE/LOCATE NOT A ROTE PROCEDURE

While Date/Locate is a precise action, it is by no means a
rote procedure. The auditor must know the theory of the
action if he is to Date/Locate successfully. He must
understand that he takes the pc's data and he works with
the pc. Robotic application of the steps will not only not
produce the desired result but can result in messing up a
case badly.

BLOW

Definition of blow: The sudden dissipation of mass in the
mind with an accompanying feeling of relief. (Technical
Dictionary.)

This definition must be understood by both auditor and pc.
It is cleared with the pc before beginning the Date/Locate
steps. Have the pc demo it, using a demo kit, if necessary,
so he has no confusion on it.

A blow is a definite manifestation. Vital data for the
auditor is that the pc must say &quot;Something blew&quot; or &quot;It
disappeared&quot; or &quot;It's gone&quot; or &quot;It vanished,&quot; not simply &quot;I
feel lighter.&quot;

METERING

During Dating/Locating the pc is on the meter but the
auditor is consulting the pc and getting the pc's answers,
while also keeping an eye on the meter. He does not resort
to meter dating or meter locating unless the pc himself
gives up on one or the other of these steps.

A pc can be made more dependent on the meter or can be made
more independent of the meter, depending upon the way the
meter is used by the auditor. If the pc's case is improving
he becomes more independent of the meter. That is the
direction you want to go.

&quot;RULE: Use the meter to date and verify date correctness by
all means but only after the pc has been unable to come up
with the date.&quot; (HCOB 4 Aug 63, ALL ROUTINES, E-METER
ERRORS, COMM CYCLE ERROR.)

The same rule would apply to using the meter on the Locate steps.

TIME

When dating anything you are using a system of measurement
of time. There are various systems for measuring time and
as time is basically a postulate or consideration there is
no absolute system for measuring time. Time can be measured
in terms of years ago. It can be measured by year, month
and day (1918 AD, January 1st). These two systems are
applicable to this planet, as the term &quot;year&quot; is the time
it takes this planet to complete an orbit around the sun.

In larger whole track dates different systems were used.
The whole point is to use the system the pc is using,
because the whole point of dating is to blow a past time
that the pc is stuck in.

And the pc will very often use the dating system of the
time period he is stuck in. It doesn't matter what system
of time measurement the pc uses. It is important that the
auditor accepts and uses the system the pc is using and
doesn't try to change it.

You're first going to ask the pc, &quot;When was it?&quot;. He may
tell you in terms of &quot;years ago&quot; or &quot;weeks ago.&quot; Or he may
say &quot;It was 1890&quot; or &quot;It was the 24th of August 1672.&quot; Or
he may use an earlier track system of dating. Either way,
you take it, and if he has said &quot;High noon on May 2nd,
1912&quot; you don't then ask &quot;How many years ago?&quot; as he has
just told you, and your question would be altering the
dating system the pc is using.

YOU CAN USE ANY SYSTEM OF TIME MEASUREMENT IN DATING; THE
IMPORTANT THING IS THAT YOU USE THE SYSTEM THE PC IS USING.

It is remarkable that a pc can date something that happened
earlier than this planet in terms of years ago. He can by
some sort of mental computer, but the auditor mustn't
require that the pc convert a date to some other system.

And when the pc has it, the auditor doesn't then alter-is
it in sequence. Found by years-
months-weeks-days-hours-minutes-seconds and fractions of a
second, one doesn't then call it back by day, year, month,
as it tangles the pc. It is called back in the same order.

WHEN CALLING BACK A DATE AS AN INDICATION, ALWAYS CALL IT BACK
IN THE SAME SEQUENCE THAT THE DATE WAS FOUND OR GIVEN.
IMPLANT DATES/ACTUAL DATES

Implant dates usually only give small reads whereas actual
dates read well. If you suspect that you are getting false
dates out of an implant, you meter check &quot;Implant date?&quot;
and you'll get a read on that question, and the false
implant date will no longer read. The actual date will read
well.

Meter check if it is:

a) a false date from an implant?

b) an actual date?

and the meter read will tell.

DATING



THE PURPOSE OF DATING IS TO GET A BLOW OF THE PAST TIME THE PC IS
STUCK IN.

Whether the pc gives the date, or whether the auditor has
to meter date it, you must remember that all you are going
for is a blow.

Sometimes you will get a blow as easily as the pc saying
&quot;It was a long time ago.&quot; A blow is accompanied by a BD and
F/N. So be alert when dating for a sudden or BD and F/N.

And if the pc doesn't originate that it blew, ask him so
you won't go on trying to date to blow, something that has
already blown!

Very often a date has to be dated precisely down to the
fraction of a second in order to get a blow.

If there is no blow on pc giving the date, or on auditor
meter dating it, you then call the date back as an
indication and it will blow. If it doesn't it is because
there is an error in the date, or the auditor altered the
date or its sequence in calling it back, or there already
was a blow on dating that wasn't noticed and was overrun.

Usually a pc will need help from the auditor to start with
and the auditor might need to do the whole dating drill on
the meter establishing the order of magnitude and every
part of the date on the meter. Then the pc's ability
improves and the pc starts to become more able to find
dates himself. The auditor must be alert for this and
accept the pc's data and never challenge, meter check or
invalidate the pc's data. Sometimes the pc will blurt the
whole date out at once, and the auditor must be ready to
write this down accurately and call it back accurately.

LOCATIONS AND DISTANCE

When locating something you are using direction and a
system of measurement of distance. Just as time is
basically a consideration, so is distance. And there are
many systems of measuring distance, both on this planet and
earlier on the track. Distance can be measured in miles,
kilometers, light-years, to name a few. In one whole track
space opera civilization, intergalactic distances were
measured in terms of how long it took a particular
spaceship, called a Hylan and intergalactic distances were
measured by the number of &quot;days of Hylan spaceflight.&quot; You
will probably find that the pc will tend to use the system
of measurement of distance that was used at the time of the
past location that he is stuck in. Just as a pc can use a
sort of mental computer to convert whole track dates into
&quot;years ago,&quot; he can also mentally convert some distances
into &quot;miles.&quot; But the auditor never expects him to do so,
and never asks him to.

YOU CAN USE ANY SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT OF DISTANCE IN
LOCATING, THE IMPORTANT THING IS THAT YOU USE THE SYSTEM THE PC IS
USING.

And when you have the distance you must call it back
accurately, and not alter-is it in sequence either.

WHEN CALLING BACK A DISTANCE AS AN INDICATION, ALWAYS CALL IT
BACK ACCURATELY, AND IN THE SAME SEQUENCE THAT IT WAS GIVEN OR
FOUND.


LOCATING

THE PURPOSE OF LOCATING IS TO GET A BLOW OF THE PAST LOCATION
THE PC IS STUCK IN.

As in dating the auditor may have to help the pc with the
meter but usually the pc will be able to find and give the
data, and the auditor never resorts to the meter if the pc
can get it.

And you may get a blow on direction step alone or on the pc
realizing it happened somewhere else, or &quot;not here&quot; or
&quot;Greece&quot; or whatever. The auditor must be alert for the or
BD and F/N and ask the pc if it blew, so as not to go on
trying to get a blow of a location that has already blown!

Usually if you don't get a blow on finding the direction
and distance, you will get a blow on calling the location
back to the pc as an indication. If not there is an error
in the direction or distance or the auditor altered it in
calling it back.

In locating, the auditor is getting the past physical
location. E.g. the auditor gets the direction, distance,
what galaxy, star, planet, country, etc., pinpointing it
down to the exact location in space where it happened.

But these items are not taken up rotely; one uses the
questions that apply.

For example, if it occurred &quot;next door&quot; one would not ask
&quot;What planet?&quot;. Or if the pc has said it's &quot;two years ago&quot;
when dating, in locating one doesn't then ask &quot;What
galaxy?&quot; as, of course, it's this one. Or what star,
either. If you start asking &quot;What galaxy?&quot; on an incident
on Earth the pc is thrown backtrack.

And if it happened outside a town in the open you wouldn't
ask what city, house, or street or room, either. You must
use the questions that apply.

The pc is of course IN the auditing room. One doesn't ask
where he is. And it's never &quot;Who else was there?&quot; or &quot;What
else is there?&quot; as these things put the pc down the track.
One does not try to run engrams at the same time one is
doing the Locate step. It is simply location.

Where? What? How far? Location.

AND in locating, if there is no instant blow when the
location is fully spotted and it seems correct, the
location is called back to the pc. It usually blows when it
is called back to the pc after it is known.

TWO SEPARATE DRILLS

There are two separate drills for dating and locating, and
which is used depends upon pc ability to find and give the
data. The first drill given is where the pc volunteers or
gives the data. The second drill is where the auditor
establishes all the data by metering. As with all
processing, the pc's ability increases as you go along, and
the auditor must be alert for this and change from meter
dating and meter locating to accepting and taking the pc's
data. It can also happen that a pc who was able to find and
give the data may run into something particularly heavy and
now need assistance from the auditor. The rule is:

NEVER RESORT TO THE METER IF THE PC CAN FIND AND GIVE THE DATA,
AND NEVER LET A PC STRUGGLE IF HE CAN'T FIND THE DATA. AND NEVER,
NEVER USE THE METER TO CHALLENGE, 'CORRECT' OR INVALIDATE THE PC'S
DATA.


PRELIMINARY STEP

Before dating and locating on a pc for the first time you
must clear what you will be doing and the words and terms
used, so that he understands these and knows what is
expected of him.

1. Give the pc an R-Factor that you will be dating the past
time of the incident (i.e. when it happened), until that blows.

2. Clear the word &quot;blow&quot; with the pc per the Tech
Dictionary definitions No. 1 and No. 2.

3. Clear any misunderstoods the pc has on dates and dating
or words used in measurement of time, or numbers (e.g.
&quot;billions,&quot; etc.).

4. Give the pc an R-Factor that you will be establishing
the direction and distance in order to find the past
location of the incident (i.e. where it happened), until
that blows.

5. Clear the term &quot;direction&quot; and the concept of pointing.
Clear the term &quot;distance&quot; and any misunderstoods the pc has
on measurement of distance (e.g. miles, lightyears, etc.).

6. Let the pc know you will be getting answers from him,
not the meter, unless it is necessary to help him with the
meter. And that if the pc should suddenly get the date or
location he should tell you. Also let the pc know that you
are dating and locating to get a blow and that when a blow
occurs to tell you, as the purpose of this procedure is to
get the mass to blow.

DATING TO BLOW/LOCATING TO BLOW

PROCEDURE BY STEPS

PROCEDURE ONE, PC GIVING THE DATA

DATING DRILL No. 1

1. R-Factor: &quot;We're going to date the past time when that
(________) happened precisely, until the mass blows.&quot;

2. Ask the pc when it happened. (If the pc doesn't know, go
to meter dating, per Dating Drill No. 2.)

3. Write down the pc's answer.

4. If not already given, have the pc give the rest of the
date right on down to the fraction of a second.

5. Call the date back to the pc accurately and in the same
sequence in which it was given, and it will blow.

(Caution: The blow may occur earlier in the dating steps
and the auditor must not go on past a blow. If you suspect
a blow and pc hasn't volunteered this, ask him if it blew.)
LOCATING DRILL No. 1

1. R-Factor: &quot;We're going to find the past location where (
) happened precisely, until the mass blows.&quot;

2. Get the pc to point to where it happened. (Points with
finger in the direction to the past location.)

3. Ask the pc the distance to that location. (This is the
distance from where the pc is now to that past location.)

4. If not already given have the pc give the rest of the
distance right on down to fractions, until you have a
precise distance.

5. Call the distance back to the pc accurately and in the
same sequence in which it was given, and it will blow.



NB. If the pc starts giving you the location in some other
terms such as &quot;On the corner of Times Square, New York,&quot;
you would of course accept the pc's data, and not ask him
to convert that into miles away, or anything else.

(Caution: The blow may occur earlier in the locating steps
and the auditor must not go on past the blow. Sometimes the
blow will occur on asking the pc to point. Sometimes the pc
while dating will also get the location and blow it too. If
you suspect a blow due to a BD and F/N and the pc hasn't
volunteered this, ask him if it blew . )

PROCEDURE TWO, AUDITOR FINDING THE DATA BY METERING

DATING DRILL No. 2

If the pc didn't know when it happened (on step 2 of Dating
Drill No. 1), you go to meter dating.

1. Establish what system of dating or time measurement this
date is measured in. Such as &quot;years ago,&quot; or by year (i.e.
1918 AD), or some entirely different system. Do not do this
if you already know it is a this lifetime date, or a this
planet date, as that would be robotic.

2. Establish the order of magnitude.

3. Meter date the date right on down precisely, even to
fractions of a second, until you get a blow-F/N.

4. If no blow-F/N when the full date is found, call it back
to the pc accurately and in the same order it was found and
you should get a blow.

5. If you haven't got a blow, there is either an error in
the date or some part of the date, or it is not precise
enough, or it blew earlier and wasn't noticed.

Meter check:

Wrong date?

Incompletely dated?

Implant date?

Some part of the date was incorrect?

Already blown?

and handle what reads, and you will get a blow-F/N.

LOCATING DRILL No. 2

It is rare that a pc can't get the direction and distance,
or otherwise pinpoint the exact past location. Should you
encounter this, do the same drill as given in Locating
Drill No. 1, with the auditor establishing each step by
metering.

1. Get pc to point to the location to get direction.

2. Establish what system of measurement of distance (i.e.
miles, or light-years, or whatever).

3. Get the distance.

4. Get any remaining increments of distance on down to
fractions or decimal points.

5. Call back the distance or location as an indication, and
you should get a blow- F/N.

6. If no blow there has been an error and you should meter check:

Is some part of the location wrong?

Wrong direction?

Wrong distance?

Incompletely located?

Already blown?

and handle what comes up, and you will get a blow-F/N.

CAUTION: In Date/Locate, if it bogs and the auditor can't
easily correct the error in dating or in locating, do not
continue messing up the pc with wrong dates or wrong
locations, as these can be very upsetting to a case.
INDICATE TO THE PC THAT THERE IS AN ERROR IN DATING OR
LOCATING AND END OFF FOR C/S INSTRUCTIONS .

A drill that can be used in locating when applicable is
given below. This must not however be done rotely when it
doesn't apply. If you knew the incident occurred in the
recent past or this lifetime, you would not ask &quot;What
galaxy?&quot; as the question wouldn't make sense, and would
throw the pc backtrack.

Point (pc points with finger)

Distance? (including increments of distance to get the
exact distance)

What galaxy?

What star?

What planet?

What country?

What city?

What street?

What house?

Position on street?

What room?

Distance from front of house?

Where in the room?

How far from each wall?

How far off the floor?

How far from the ceiling?

continuing with questions which will narrow it down to the
precise location, to a blow-F/N .

NOTE: The above steps, particularly, cannot be rote. Listen
to the pc and work with him, realistically, to get the
location spotted exactly, but do not evaluate for him in
any way.

If at some point on these steps the location turns out to
be in the middle of the ocean or in a field, etc., the
auditor uses available landmarks or reference points to get
the location (i.e., distance from the nearest point of
land? or, distance from the big rock?) down to a blow-F/N.

If, while locating, the pc starts running the incident or
gives too much &quot;scene&quot; the auditor has the pc point again,
then continues from where he left off on the Locate steps.

LIABILITY

In dating and locating there is a possible source of BPC,
peculiar to dating and locating.

A correct date for one incident or mass can act as a wrong
date for another incident or mass, as it is a wrong date
for it.

A correct location for one incident or mass can act as a
wrong location for other incidents or masses, as it is
wrong for the others.

It is peculiar to dating and locating that a right date or
a right location can cause BPC by also being a wrong date
or wrong location for other incidents or masses. This does
not always occur, but is noted here should an auditor or
C/S encounter it.

Manifestations of this are:

a) pc getting upset inexplicably

b) getting a read on both &quot;Correct date?&quot; and &quot;Wrong date?&quot;

c) TA going up

d) increase of mass or pressure.

It will relieve on the indication that the date found is a
wrong date for other incidents or masses, and on the
indication that the location found is a wrong location for
other incidents or masses.

SUMMARY

A CORRECT DATE, ESPECIALLY IF TAKEN DOWN TO SECONDS AND
FRACTIONS OF A SECOND, WILL BLOW.

A CORRECT LOCATION, ESPECIALLY IF TAKEN DOWN TO MINUTE
INCREMENTS OF DISTANCE, WILL BLOW.

Date/Locate, when done correctly, quickly and smoothly,
works well and is successful.

The longer it takes the more it will restimulate all sorts
of other things which have nothing to do with the course of
action.

The Date/Locate steps must NOT be done robotically. One has
to understand the mechanics of how it's done and why.

The essence of Date/Locate is to bring the pc to PT by
erasing the date by spotting and the location by spotting,
as the pc is out of PT fixed by both date and location.

If the theory is understood nobody would do it rotely.

This is a highly precise action to be done smoothly with
good TRs. Its results are phenomenal.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:pm.dm.jk
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************


84. HCOB  22 JUL 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JULY 1963

MA
Franchise
BPI


YOU CAN BE RIGHT


Rightness and wrongness form a common source of argument
and struggle.

The concept of rightness reaches very high and very low on
the Tone Scale.

And the effort to be right is the last conscious striving
of an individual on the way out. I-am-
right-and-they-are-wrong is the lowest concept that can be
formulated by an unaware case.

What is right and what is wrong are not necessarily
definable for everyone. These vary according to existing
moral codes and disciplines and, before Scientology,
despite their use in law as a test of &quot;sanity&quot;, had no
basis in fact but only in opinion.

In Dianetics and Scientology a more precise definition
arose. And the definition became as well the true
definition of an overt act. An overt act is not just
injuring someone or something: an overt act is an act of
omission or commission which does the least good for the
least number of dynamics or the most harm to the greatest
number of dynamics. (See the Eight Dynamics.)

Thus a wrong action is wrong to the degree that it harms
the greatest number of dynamics. And a right action is
right to the degree that it benefits the greatest number of
dynamics.

Many people think that an action is an overt simply because
it is destructive. To them all destructive actions or
omissions are overt acts. This is not true. For an act of
commission or omission to be an overt act it must harm the
greater number of dynamics. A failure to destroy can be,
therefore, an overt act. Assistance to something that would
harm a greater number of dynamics can also be an overt act.

An overt act is something that harms broadly. A beneficial
act is something that helps broadly. It can be a beneficial
act to harm something that would be harmful to the greater
number of dynamics.

Harming everything and helping everything alike can be
overt acts. Helping certain things and harming certain
things alike can be beneficial acts.

The idea of not harming anything and helping everything are
alike rather mad. It is doubtful if you would think helping
enslaves was a beneficial action and equally doubtful if
you would consider the destruction of a disease an overt act.

In the matter of being right or being wrong, a lot of muddy
thinking can develop. There are no absolute rights or
absolute wrongs. And being right does not consist of being
unwilling to harm and being wrong does not consist only of
not harming.

There is an irrationality about &quot;being right&quot; which not
only throws out the validity of the legal test of sanity
but also explains why some people do very wrong things and
insist they are doing right.

The answer lies in an impulse, inborn in everyone, to try
to be right. This is an insistence which rapidly becomes
divorced from right action. And it is accompanied by an
effort to make others wrong, as we see in hypercritical
cases. A being who is apparently unconscious is still being
right and making others wrong. It is the last criticism.

We have seen a &quot;defensive person&quot; explaining away the most
flagrant wrongnesses. This is &quot;justification&quot; as well. Most
explanations of conduct, no matter how far-fetched, seem
perfectly right to the person making them since he or she
is only asserting self-rightness and other-wrongness.

We have long said that that which is not admired tends to
persist. If no one admires a person for being right, then
that person's &quot;brand of being right&quot; will persist, no
matter how mad it sounds. Scientists who are aberrated
cannot seem to get many theories. They do not because they
are more interested in insisting on their own odd
rightnesses than they are in finding truth. Thus we get
strange &quot;scientific truths&quot; from men who should know
better, including the late Einstein. Truth is built by
those who have the breadth and balance to see also where
they're wrong.

You have heard some very absurd arguments out among the
crowd. Realize that the speaker was more interested in
asserting his or her own rightness than in being right.

A thetan tries to be right and fights being wrong. This is
without regard to being right about something or to do
actual right. It is an insistence which has no concern with
a rightness of conduct.

One tries to be right always, right down to the last spark.

How then, is one ever wrong?

It is this way:

One does a wrong action, accidentally or through oversight.
The wrongness of the action or inaction is then in conflict
with one's necessity to be right. So one then may continue
and repeat the wrong action to prove it is right.

This is a fundamental of aberration. All wrong actions are
the result of an error followed by an insistence on having
been right. Instead of righting the error (which would
involve being wrong) one insists the error was a right
action and so repeats it.

As a being goes down scale it is harder and harder to admit
having been wrong. Nay, such an admission could well be
disastrous to any remaining ability or sanity.

For rightness is the stuff of which survival is made. And
as one approaches the last ebb of survival one can only
insist on having been right, for to believe for a moment
one has been wrong is to court oblivion.

The last defense of any being is &quot;I was right&quot;. That
applies to anyone. When that defense crumbles, the lights
go out.

So we are faced with the unlovely picture of asserted
rightness in the face of flagrant wrongness. And any
success in making the being realize their wrongness results
in an immediate degradation, unconsciousness, or at best a
loss of personality. Pavlov, Freud, psychiatry alike never
grasped the delicacy of these facts and so evaluated and
punished the criminal and insane into further criminality
and insanity.

All justice today contains in it this hidden error-that the
last defense is a belief in personal rightness regardless
of charges and evidence alike, and that the effort to make
another wrong results only in degradation.

But all this would be a hopeless impasse leading to highly
chaotic social conditions were it not for one saving fact:

All repeated and &quot;incurable&quot; wrongnesses stem from the
exercise of a last defence: &quot;trying to be right&quot;. Therefore
the compulsive wrongness can be cured no matter how mad it
may seem or how thoroughly its rightness is insisted upon.

Getting the offender to admit his or her wrongness is to
court further degradation and even unconsciousness or the
destruction of a being. Therefore the purpose of punishment
is defeated and punishment has minimal workability.

But by getting the offender off the compulsive repetition
of the wrongness, one then cures it.

But how?

By rehabilitating the ability to be right!

This has limitless application-in training, in social
skills, in marriage, in law, in life.

Example: A wife is always burning dinner. Despite scolding,
threats of divorce, anything, the compulsion continues. One
can wipe this wrongness out by getting her to explain what
is right about her cooking. This may well evoke a raging
tirade in some extreme cases, but if one flattens the
question, that all dies away and she happily ceases to burn
dinners.

Carried to classic proportions but not entirely necessary
to end the compulsion, a moment in the past will be
recovered when she

accidentally burned a dinner and could not face up to
having done a wrong action. To be right she thereafter had
to burn dinners.

Go into a prison and find one sane prisoner who says he did
wrong. You won't find one. Only the broken wrecks will say
so out of terror of being hurt. But even they don't believe
they did wrong.

A judge on a bench, sentencing criminals, would be given
pause to realize that not one malefactor sentenced really
thought he had done wrong and will never believe it in
fact, though he may seek to avert wrath by saying so.

The do-gooder crashes into this continually and is given
his loses by it.

But marriage, law and crime do not constitute all the
spheres of living where this applies.

These facts embrace all of life. The student who can't
learn, the worker who can't work, the boss who can't boss
are all caught on one side of the right-wrong question.
They are being completely one-sided. They are being
&quot;last-ditch-right&quot;. And opposing them, those who would
teach them are fixed on the other side &quot;admit-you
are-wrong&quot;. And out of this we get not only no-change but
actual degradation where it &quot;wins&quot;. But there are no wins
in this imbalance, only loses for both.

Thetans on the way down don't believe they are wrong
because they don't dare believe it.

And so they do not change.

Many a preclear in processing is only trying to prove
himself right and the auditor wrong, particularly the lower
case levels, and so we sometimes get no-change sessions.

And those who won't be audited at all are totally fixed on
asserted rightness and are so close to gone that any
question of their past rightness would, they feel, destroy
them.

I get my share of this when a being, close to extinction,
and holding contrary views, grasps for a moment the
rightness of Scientology and then in sudden defence asserts
his own &quot;rightnesses&quot;, sometimes close to terror.

It would be a grave error to go on letting an abuser of
Scientology abuse. The route is to get him or her to
explain how right he or she is without explaining how wrong
Scientology is, for to do the last is to let them commit a
serious overt. &quot;What is right about your mind&quot; would
produce more case change and win more friends than any
amount of evaluation or punishment to make them wrong.

You can be right. How? By getting another to explain how he
or she is right-until he or she, being less defensive now,
can take a less compulsive point of view. You don't have to
agree with what they think. You only have to acknowledge
what they say. And suddenly they can be right.

A lot of things can be done by understanding and using this
mechanism. It will take, however, some study of this
article before it can be gracefully applied-for all of us
are reactive to some degree on this subject. And those who
sought to enslave us did not neglect to install a
right-wrong pair of items on the far back track. But these
won't really get in your way.

As Scientologists, we are faced by a frightened society who
think they would be wrong if we were found to be right. We
need a weapon to correct this. We have one here.

And you can be right, you know. I was probably the first to
believe you were, mechanism or no mechanism. The road to
rightness is the road to survival. And every person is
somewhere on that scale.

You can make yourself right, amongst other ways, by making
others right enough to afford to change their minds. Then a
lot more of us will arrive.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH :gl.Jh.cden
Copyright  1963
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

85. HCOB   5 SEP 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 5 SEPTEMBER 1978

Remimeo
Level IV Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses


ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE


Ref: 
HCOB 22 Jul 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT
HCOB 1 Sep 63 SCIENTOLOGY THREE CLEARING, CLEARING, CLEARING, R3SC
HCOB 23 Aug 66 SERVICE FACSIMILE
HCOB 30 Nov 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES
TAPE: 6308C27 SH SPEC 299 RIGHTNESS AND WRONGNESS
TAPE: 6309C04 SH SPEC 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE
TAPE: 6309C03 SH SPEC 302A R3SC
TAPE: 6309C05 SH SPEC 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT
TAPE: 6309C18 SH SPEC 308 ST HILL SERVICE FAC HANDLING


FACSIMILE: A mental picture unknowingly created; a copy of
the physical universe environment, complete with all the
perceptions, at some time in the past.

SERVICE: A method of providing a person with the use of
something; the action or result of giving assistance or
advantage; work done; duty performed.

COMPUTATION: That aberrated evaluation and postulate that
one must be in a certain state in order to succeed.

SERVICE FACSIMILE: THE SERVICE FACSIMILE IS THAT COMPUTATION
GENERATED BY THE PRECLEAR (NOT THE BANK) TO
MAKE SELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG: TO DOMINATE
OR ESCAPE DOMINATION AND ENHANCE OWN SURVIVAL
AND INJURE THAT OF OTHERS.

Note that it is a computation, not a doingness, beingness
or havingness. We could call this a &quot;service computation&quot;
but we will maintain the term we have used to describe this
phenomenon throughout the technology: &quot;service facsimile.&quot;

It is a computation that the pc adopted when, in an extreme
situation, he felt endangered by something but could not
itsa it.

It is called a service facsimile because he uses it; it is
&quot;of service&quot; to him.

Aberration, anybody's aberration on any subject, has been
of some use to them at some time or other. You can trace it
back. It's been of some use, otherwise they wouldn't keep
mocking it up. But now, if you put it up against survival
standards, you'd find it very non-survival.

The pc adopted this because he couldn't stand the confusion
in a situation. So he adopted a safe solution. A safe
solution is always adopted as a retreat from the
environmental restimulation. He adopted a safe solution in
that instance and he survived. His safe solution
became his stable datum. He has hung onto it ever since. It
is the computation, the fixed idea, he uses to handle life,
his service facsimile.

HOW THE SERVICE FACSIMILE BECOMES FIXED

An idea is the thing most easily substituted for a thetan.
An idea doesn't have any mass connected with it basically.
And it appears to have some wisdom in it so it's very
easily substituted for a thetan. Thus the idea, the stable
datum he has adopted, is substituted for the thetan.

How does this stable datum become so fixed? It gets fixed,
and more and more firmly as time goes on, by the confusion
it is supposed to handle but doesn't.

The stable datum was adopted in lieu of inspection. The
person ceased to inspect, he fell back from inspecting, he
fell back from living. He put the datum there to substitute
for his own observation and his own coping with life, and
at that moment he started an accumulation of confusion.

That which is not confronted and inspected tends to
persist. Thus in the absence of his own confronting mass
collects. The stable datum forbids inspection. It's an
automatic solution.

It's &quot;safe.&quot; It solves everything. He no longer has to
inspect to solve, so he never anises the mass. He gets
caught in the middle of the mass. And it collects more and
more confusion and his ability to inspect becomes less and
less. The more he isn't confronting, the less he can
confront. This becomes a dwindling spiral.

So the thing he has adopted to handle his environment for
him is the thing which reduces his ability to handle his
environment.

Those things which do not respond to routine auditing, that
routine auditing won't change, are rooted in this mechanism.

Therefore, it is important to find the idea on which he is
so fixed. Pull the fixed idea and you free the individual
for a broader perimeter of inspection.

In service fac handling the reason you get tone arm action
when the fixed idea has been pulled is that the confusion
which has been amassed and dammed up for so long is now
running off.

RIGHT/WRONG, DOMINATE AND SURVIVE

Right and wrong are the tools of survival. In order to
survive you have to be right. There is a level at which
true rightness is analytical, and there is a level at which
rightness and wrongness cease to be analytical or
comprehensible. When it drops below that point it's aberration.

The point you degenerate from survive to succumb is the
point you recognize you are wrong. That is the beginning of
succumb. The moment one becomes worried about his own
survival he enters into the necessity to dominate in order
to survive.

It goes: the insistence upon survival, followed by the
necessity to dominate, followed then by the necessity to be
right. These postulates go downhill. So you get an
aberrated rightness or wrongness. The game of domination
consists of making the other fellow wrong in order to be right.

That is the essence of the service facsimile.

The reason the service facsimile isn't rational is because
you have A=A=As along the whole line. Coming down the line
it works itself back and forth in an aberrated A=A=A. If
the individual is surviving he must be right. And people
will defend the most fantastic wrongnesses on the basis
they are being right.

In PT and at any point along the track, the fellow is
trying to be right, trying to be right, trying to be right.
Whatever he's doing he's trying to be right. In order to
survive you have to be right more than you're wrong, so you
get the obsession to be right in order to survive. The lie
is that he can't do anything else except survive.

It isn't that trying to be right is wrong-it's obsessively
being right about something that's obviously wrong. That's
when the individual is no longer able to select his own
course of behaviour. When he is obsessively following
courses of behaviour which are uninspected in order to be
right.

There is nothing sane about a service facsimile, there is
no rationality to it. The computation does not fit the
incident or event occurring. It simply enforces,
exaggerates and destroys freedom of choice over the
exercise of ability to be happy or powerful or normal or
active. It destroys power, destroys freedom of choice.

Wherever that zone or area is you'll see the individual
worsening. He is on a dwindling spiral. But he himself is
generating it.

The intention to be right is the strongest intention in the
universe. Above it you have the effort to dominate and
above that you have the effort to survive. These things are
strong. But we're talking here about a mental activity. A
thinking activity. An intentional activity.

Survival-that just happens. Domination-that just happens.
Those are not intended things. But you get down along the
level of intended and it's right or wrong. The strongest
intention in the universe.

It is always an aberrated solution. It always exists in PT
and is part of the environment of the pc. He's generating
it. It's his solution. Overwhelmed as he is by it, he is
still generating it.

It's aberrated because it's an uninspected solution. And it
is something that everyone unintentionally or otherwise is
telling the pc is wrong and causing him to assert that it
is right.

The perfect solution when he first got hold of it. But now
it monitors his life; it's living his life for him. And it
doesn't even vaguely begin to take care of his life.

That is the anatomy of the service facsimile.

You are going to find these on any pc you audit. A service
facsimile is the clue, the key to a pc's case. The route to
succumb which he blindly asserts is his route to survival.
And every pc has more than one of these.

Fortunately, we have the tech to salvage him. We are the
only ones who do.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:dr
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

86. HCOB  30 NOV 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 30 NOVEMBER 1966

Tech Hats
Auditors
Level IV
Students


ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES

The location of service facsimiles requires a proper
listing question, the absence of which can lead to missing
the actual service fac or overrunning a lower release grade.

Of the assessment methods, the following should probably be
ruled out as an overrun of earlier grades or on the basis
of getting a free needle on a previous grade: 

1. Slow assessment with ITSA (overrun Grade 0)

2. Assessment by problems (overrun Grade 1)

3. Assessment by parts of existence (overrun Grade 0)

This leaves as acceptable methods:

1. &quot;In this lifetime, what do you use to make others wrong?&quot;

2. &quot;In this lifetime, what do you think your service facsimile is?&quot;

(for a Scientologist trained to Level IV)

3. &quot;In this lifetime, what would be a safe solution to
....?&quot; (the blank having been obtained by questions given
on the tapes to find either a hidden standard or hidden
problem).

4. Assessment of a prepared list, using level found, in &quot;In
this lifetime, what have you

.....(prehav level)?&quot;

The point being not to start out at the beginning by
listing a question which OBVIOUSLY WILL NOT RESULT IN
FINDING A SERVICE FAC, in which instance the rule of
declaring the grade on a floating needle obtained on the
list could not possibly apply.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.cden
Copyright  1966
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


**************

87. HCOB   6 SEP 78 R3 SC - A FULL SERV FAC HANDLING UPDATED WITH NED


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978
Issue III

Remimeo
Level IV Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses

URGENT-IMPORTANT

ROUTINE THREE SC - A FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED
WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS


Ref: 
HCOB 22 Jul 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT
HCOB I Sep 63 SCIENTOLOGY THREE CLEARING, CLEARING, CLEARING, R3 SC
HCOB 23 Aug 66 SERVICE FACSIMILE
HCOB 30 Nov 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES
TAPE: 6309C04 SH SPEC 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE
TAPE: 6309C05 SH SPEC 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT
TAPE: 6308C28 SH SPEC 300 THE TA AND SERVICE FAC
TAPE: 6309C12 SH SPEC 305 SERVICE FACS
HCOB 26 Jun 78 11 NED Series 6 ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
HCOB 18 Jun 78 NED Series 4 ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM
HCOB 5 Sep 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE
HCOB 6 Sep 78 11 SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS

________

NOTE: Dianetic Clears may be run on service facs but only
with any Dianetics steps deleted, as they are not to be run
on Dianetics.

________

We are into a new echelon of service facsimile running.

At Saint Hill in the mid-60s many, many service facs were
found on each pc and the earliest service fac running
included the use of Dianetics.

This was later omitted from service fac procedure and
service facs were handled solely with Scientology tech by
running off the automaticities on the computation to
cognition, F/N and VGIs in the pc.

Phenomenal gains and case changes were made on pcs with
that tech alone-all of them valid. That tech has been
retained as a vital action to service fac handling.

Now, with the advent of New Era Dianetics, service fac
handling has been restored to its full technology.

New Era Dianetics has opened the door to a more complete
and finite handling of a service fac, with precision and
exactness, than we have had heretofore. We no longer just
find a service fac, audit off the automaticities, key it
out and forget it. We audit it out fully and terminatedly,
using New Era Dianetics to take it down to its basics and
erase those.

This in no way contradicts the fact that there were many
pcs who, with a service fac found and the automaticities
taken off, were able to actually then blow the service fac
computation upon inspection.

What it does make possible is the actual erasure of a
service fac and its residuals on every pc, one for one. And
not just one service facsimile per pc, but many.

An auditor who has been trained on service fac running
prior to this bulletin will need the tech he already has
plus an excellent command of New Era Dianetics tech. If he
has not done the New Era Dianetics Course it will be
required before attempting to run Routine 3SC-A. A Class IV
auditor who has already done the New Era Dianetics Course
need only review it in order to be able to handle all the
steps of the new, full service fac procedure.

SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING REVISED BY STEPS

Before you can run flows on a service facsimile you must
first find it. You want the pc's service facsimile. You
don't find a service facsimile by listing for it on flows.
You find the pc's service facsimile and run it on the flows.

The sequence is: You list for the pc's service fac, find
it, run the automaticities off it; then you run the service
fac itself on R3RA, engram running by chains. It is run to
basic and full Dianetic end phenomena.

You don't leave a service fac until you have taken it apart
and blown it at its very roots.

Then you list for another service fac, using a different
listing question, and handle it fully. And another, and
another. A pc can have many, many service facsimiles. You
peel them off until you find the main service fac at the
core of the case. And you handle that one fully, as you do
the others, per the steps above.

Needless to say, you are going to see some remarkable results.

FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE PROCEDURE

PRELIMINARY STEPS:

0a. Put in the R (Reality) Factor with the pc, telling him
briefly what is going to be done in the session.

0b. Clear &quot;computation&quot; very thoroughly with the pc. Use
the Tech Dictionary, HCOB 23 Aug 66, SERVICE FACSIMILE, and
any other reference you feel the pc may need.

Have him demo it until you are certain he fully understands it.

0c. Clear the bracket commands (right/wrong, dominate,
survival)first, using &quot;Birds fly&quot; as a sample service
facsimile. Clearing the bracket commands is done at this
point so you will be able to use these questions
immediately when the service fac is found without putting
stops on the pc's first rush of automaticities coming off.

0d. Then, clear the listing question.

STEPS OF THE PROCEDURE:

A. List and null for the pc's service fac, using the question:

&quot;In this lifetime, what do you use to make others wrong?&quot;

You want a BD F/N item that is a computation (not a
doingness, beingness or havingness).

When you get it, indicate the item. Then indicate the F/N.
Then, despite the BD F/N, go on to the next step of the
handling.

B. Run the service fac found in 1 on the brackets:

1. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make you right?

2. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make others wrong?

3. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you
escape domination? 

4. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you to 
dominate others? 

5. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) aid your survival?

6. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) hinder the
survival of others? These are run as follows:

Give the pc the first question, &quot;In this lifetime, how
would (service fac) make you right?&quot; and let him run with
it. He will have a rush of answers, answers coming too fast
to be said easily, at this stage. Don't repeat the question
unless the pc needs it. Just let him answer 1-1-1-1-1-1-1
(he may give you as many as 50 answers) until he comes to a
cognition or runs out of answers or inadvertently answers
Question 2.

Then switch to Question 2: &quot;In this lifetime how would
(service fac) make others wrong?&quot; Treat this the same way,
i.e. let him answer 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2 until he cognites or
runs out of answers or starts to answer Question 1. Then
switch back to Question 1, same handling, back to Question
2, same handling, as long as pc has answers coming easily.
Upon cognition and F/N, acknowledge, indicate the F/N and
end off on 1 and 2.

Now give him Question 3: &quot;In this lifetime how would
(service fac) help you escape domination?&quot; and let it run
by the same method as above. When this seems cooled off,
use Question 4: &quot;In this lifetime, how would (service fac)
help you to dominate others?&quot; Use Questions 3 and 4 as
above, as long as pc has answers coming easily. Upon
cognition and F/N, acknowledge, indicate the F/N and go on
to the next bracket.

Using the same method as above, give him Question 5: &quot;In
this lifetime, how would (service fac) aid your survival?&quot;
When he's run out on 5-5-5-5-5-5, switch to Question 6: &quot;In
this lifetime, how would (service fac) hinder the survival
of others?&quot; Use Questions 5 and 6 as above as long as pc
has answers coming easily. Let him get off all the
automaticities and come to a cognition and F/N. Acknowledge
and indicate the F/N.

At this point it is safe to end off on running the
brackets. The idea is not to beat the process to death. The
pc will have automaticities coming off thick and fast early
in the run.

These must be gone and the pc bright, F/Ning and VGIs when
you end off. You are only trying to end the compulsive
character of the service facsimile found and get it off
automatic and get the pc to see it better at this stage,
not to bleed the process of every bit of TA action.

Running the service fac in the brackets will result in a
major cognition, which could occur at any point during this
running. When it does occur it is the EP of this step of
the service fac handling. End off and go onto the R3RA step.

NOTE: In running a Dianetic Clear on service facs, you
would end off running this service fac at this point, when
the pc had reached a good cognition, F/N and VGIs. Do

NOT run the Dianetic actions of service fac handling on a
Dianetic Clear, as these pcs are not to be run on
Dianetics. When you have completed one service fac on Steps
A and B. you can then list for another service fac and
repeat the procedure.

(NOTE: If the service fac found on any pc did not run on
the brackets, it would need to be prepchecked. See sections
&quot;When Running Off The Automaticity&quot; and &quot;When To Prepcheck&quot;
below.)

C. Run the service fac R3RA Quad, each flow to EP. It is
not run narrative and it is not preassessed; otherwise full
New Era Dianetics tech is used, per HCOB 26 June 78R II,
New Era Dianetics Series 6, ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS.

The service fac phrase itself is used as the running item.

The commands for running a service fac on R3RA Quad Flows are:

FLOW 1: &quot;Locate a time when you used (service fac).&quot;

(Example: &quot;Locate a time when you used all horses sleep in beds. &quot;)

FLOW 2: &quot;Locate an incident of your causing another to use
(service fac).&quot; 

FLOW 3: &quot;Locate an incident of others causing others to 
use (service fac).&quot; 

FLOW 0: &quot;Locate an incident of you causing yourself to 
use (service fac).&quot;

Take each flow down its chain of incidents to the basic and
full Dianetic EP: F/N, postulate (postulate off = erasure),
and VGIs.

That will be the end of all vestiges of that service fac.

D. List for another service fac on the pc, using the
listing question:

&quot;In this lifetime, what do you use to dominate others?&quot;

When you have the service fac, repeat Steps B and C above.

E. Find another service fac on the pc with the listing question:

&quot;In this lifetime, what do you use to aid your own survival?&quot;

Handle the service fac per Steps B and C above.

F. Continue to find and handle service facs on the pc,
using, in order, the following listing questions:

1. &quot;In this lifetime, what do you use to make yourself right?&quot;

2. &quot;In this lifetime, what do you use to escape domination?&quot;

3. &quot;In this lifetime, what do you use to hinder the
survival of others?&quot; 

Further listing questions which can be used are given on 
HCOB 30 Nov 66, ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES.

You will need to find and handle several service facsimiles
on the pc which will then add up to the big one.


WHEN LISTING FOR THE SERVICE FACSIMILE

You are listing for a BD F/N item. Write down each
computation the pc gives you exactly as he states it,
VERBATIM, with its read, no matter how improbable, non
sequitur or inane it may sound.

The service fac operates like a magnet as you're listing.
You've given the pc the question and as the question is in
the vicinity of the service fac you've already ticked it.
It draws the pc's attention to it. He's listing along and
suddenly he'll put a non sequitur item on the list. It
doesn't make sense. It doesn't even answer the question,
but there it is. Because his attention is being pulled to
this inevitably. You're asking him for answers and he gives
you the rightest answer he knows-&quot;People always jump off
the Empire State Building.&quot; That's the solution.

That solves everything. It blows the TA down. That's the
service fac.

Indicate the item to the pc; then indicate the F/N.

You're now ready to run it in the brackets.

WHEN RUNNING OFF THE AUTOMATICITY

If you've found a service fac the pc won't be able to stay
out of it, I guarantee you.

The first question is always how would it make him right.
(Never how would it make him wrong. Never, never, never.)
The automaticities should start with the first question. If
not, ask him how it would make others wrong. You almost
always enter it at the level of right/wrong. But don't make
the blunder of thinking it can't be a service fac if it
doesn't enter at that level. Try it on the other levels. It
can enter at the level of dominate; it might enter at the
level of survival.

But if-on one of those-the pc doesn't immediately jump in
and swim into the whirlpool, it's not it. If he tells you,
&quot;Well, let's see . . . make me right, no, hmmmm....&quot; or
&quot;... escape domination ... no, doesn't make sense,&quot; that's
not it.

If he says that isn't it, then that isn't it. Don't hang
him with a wrong service fac because it's too easy to find
a right one. They abound.

If he hasn't jumped in and swum madly to the center of the
whirlpool and gotten embroiled in this thing, it's not it.
Because that's the first thing they want to do with a
service fac-drown.

When you have the right one you'll get the automaticities
coming off thick and fast. Don't stop the avalanche with
acknowledgements. Don't stop it with a new question. Let it
run out.

It's not one auditing question for one answer. It's one
auditing question for one waterfall.

WHEN TO PREPCHECK

When the item found as a service fac won't run on any of
the brackets you prepcheck it to EP (F/N, cog, VGIs). Ref:
HCOB 14 March 71R, F/N EVERYTHING.

A rightness/wrongness computation doesn't surrender to
normal auditing because it is a service fac. The pc has a
vested interest in holding onto it. He won't be able to
itsa it on a Prepcheck. Thus, a service fac, if present,
will turn on mass on a Prepcheck.

The Prepcheck is a series of types of decisions thetans
make about things. So if it doesn't prepcheck the Prepcheck
must be in conflict with the rightness and wrongness.

Reversely, if it's not a service fac it will prepcheck, and
you polish it off by that method to EP.

Then go back to the list and find a service fac that will run.

COMPLETING SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING WITH R3RA

Even when the pc has gotten off the automaticities, has
cognited and is comparatively free of the compulsive
character of the service facsimile, there is more to be
handled.

Running the service fac using R3RA enables him to run out
what he has done with it to make others wrong, etc. These
will be the actual most charged incidents in which he's
used it, which will have accumulated in his wake as he went
along substituting the service fac for himself and never
inspecting the consequences. He will now be free to inspect
those parts of the track as himself, and to inspect as well
the effects of the service fac on the other flows.

Finally, the use of R3RA, engram running by chains, enables
him to fully erase the somatics and engram chains which
have their roots in the service fac, or vice versa -as well
as the postulates underlying them.

ENDING SERVICE FAC RUNNING

Service fac running can be ended off when you have fully
run many service facs (which will lead to the main service
fac). When the main service fac has been run to full EP,
service fac handling is complete.

NOTE: It might happen (rarely) that you get the main
service fac on the pc on your first listing and nulling. It
will be rare because the main one does not usually come to
view until the others have been taken off. You run it, of
course. Any service fac, run, produces change, but on this
one you will see the pc changing character before your
eyes. The results are quite astounding.

But realize that he does have other, lesser service facs
which do not simply dissolve because the main core service
fac is now gone, even though they have been leaning upon it.

You will need to L&amp;N for these and completely clean the pc
of service facs.

The main core service facsimile will be the one the pc has
used as a solution to all of life.

When found and run it will be unmistakable to both the pc
and the auditor. When this one has been completed on all
the steps above, as well as the lesser service facs
surrounding it, you will have attained the EP on service
fac running.

You will have brought about a complete character change in
the individual, returned his freedom of choice and his
freedom to inspect and enabled him to be truly right.

And that is the stuff of which sanity is made.

This level is actually the sanity level.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:dr
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

88. HCOB   6 SEP 78 SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978

Issue II
Remimeo
Level IV
Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses


SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS

Reference: 
HCOB 5 Sep 78 Anatomy Of A Service Facsimile
HCOB 1 Sep 63 Scientology Three Clearing, Clearing, Clearing, R3 SC
HCOB 6 Sep 78 Urgent, Important, R3 Issue III SC-A, Full Ser Fac Handling
TAPE: 6308C27 SH SPEC 299 Rightness &amp; Wrongness
TAPE: 6309C04 SH SPEC 302 How To Find a Service Facsimile
TAPE: 6309C03 SH SPEC 302A R3SC
TAPE: 6309C05 SH SPEC 303 Service Facsimile Assessment
TAPE: 6309C18 SH SPEC 308 St. Hill Service Fac Handling
HCOB 3 Sep 78 Definition Of A Rock Slam
HCOB 10 Aug 76R R/Ses, What They Mean

__________

A service facsimile is a brother to R/Ses and evil intentions.

This is easily seen when one understands the anatomy of the
service fac and the right/wrong, dominate and survive
computations that enter into it. And when one understands
that an R/S always means a hidden, evil intention and that
the total reason for an R/S is to make wrong. In order to
get someone to succumb they have to be wrong.

Way back up there the idea preceding the service fac was
right, really right. Then it came down a bit and was a
method of survival and then it was a method of dominating
and then it was a method of being right in order to make
others wrong.

And in that contest one got enough overts so that the
communication line took a switcheroo. What was right about
it is now wrong about it and what was once wrong is now
right. A=A=A enters into the situation where rightness
becomes wrongness. All of his overts get piled up on one of
these fixed ideas, or what we call a service facsimile.

It isn't actually a facsimile at all. It's the guy himself
keeping facsimiles in restimulation because he &quot;knows&quot;
what's best. The person himself is generating the fixed
idea; it is not the bank.

It isn't what aberration the individual is dramatizing.
It's what aberration does the individual dredge up in order
to make somebody wrong. It isn't the accidental thing you
think it is. It's intended.

The intention is to be right and make others wrong, to
dominate others and escape domination oneself, to aid own
survival and hinder the survival of others. That is the
service fac-blood brother to the hidden, evil intention
that is behind the rock slam.

This does not mean you will necessarily see R/Ses on every
service fac you run. It does mean that WHERE A PC IS R/SING
IN AN AREA YOU HAVE AN AREA OF A HEAVY, A SEVERE, SERVICE FAC.

Know when you see an R/S that the individual is in the grip
of an evil intention which he himself is generating. He
intends that area or subject on which he is R/Sing nothing
but harm.

Calculatingly, covertly, he will go to great lengths to
carry his intentions out, at all times carefully concealing
the fact.

The evil intention is not limited to terminals. He's not
R/Sing on a terminal; he's R/Sing on the evil intention.
The evil intention can associate with many terminals.

The R/S dominates the individual; it is the person. He has
been overwhelmed by it. In that area he has no ability to
reason; he has no freedom to choose. The evil intention is
substituted for livingness. It is his safe solution to
life, his service facsimile.

The service fac does not respond to ordinary auditing
because in the course of ordinary auditing it does not get
inspected. It, by its nature, forbids inspection. But when
addressed at the right/wrong level the pc gives it up
easily because in that area he has no power of choice.

MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC

We have had, for many years, service fac processing with
which to handle these obsessions, and thus to handle the
person who R/Ses.

But it is not just finding one service facsimile. You find
many service facs which then add up to the big one. At
Saint Hill in the mid-60s this was commonly associated with
R/Ses.

It was what the pc had done with the service fac to make
others wrong which was important, not just finding it.
Early on, the tech included auditing them out with
Dianetics. And you found many, many more than one on each
pc. We used to get complete character changes with this.

The full tech on this has been submerged over the past
several years. It is probably this omission of requiring
several service facs to be run and then auditing them out
with Dianetics that has resulted in so many R/Sers going on
up undetected.

As of this writing the full tech has been exhumed and we
have now New Era Dianetics tech to help strip these
packages down and take them apart at their basics.

So we not only have a more thorough means of handling
service facs than ever before- we also have a more reliable
route to the handling of an R/Ser.

BUT IT'S MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC.

You may audit off one, two or three apparent service
facsimiles that all answer up to the complete description
of a service fac. And they will run. But all are actually
leaning on the central service fac that is in restimulation
in PT. As you take these lesser service facs off the
central one comes to view.

On the first ones you find, the most you can hope for is
you found something that blew the TA down and moved you
closer to finding the main service fac. So you take them.

If you've found a service fac the needle will be looser and
the TA in reasonable range.

And it will run on the right/wrong, etc. brackets and the
pc will get off automaticities. When you've finally found
several and walked it all the way through to the service
fac it's as if all the other service facs you've been peeling 
off are like the bands of trees and sod that lie up against 
the mountain peak. So you take the service facsimiles and 
run them as you find them. You unburden the cliffs before you 
pull the mountain out by the roots.

As you're running out the first service facs you're
reversing the dwindling spiral, you're restoring the
individual's ability to handle his environment because he's
now seeing it, he's now beginning to confront it.

And by the time you've pulled the main one-the mountain-out
by its roots you've returned him to sanity. He is now able
to inspect; he no longer needs a &quot;safe solution.&quot; It is the
most dangerous thing in the world to have a safe solution,
because that is the hole out of which sanity drains.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:mf
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


**************

89. HCOB   7 JUL 64 JUSTIFICATIONS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 7 JULY 1964

Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students

SCIENTOLOGY III &amp; IV

JUSTIFICATIONS

The reasons overts are overts to people is JUSTIFICATIONS.

If you ask a pc what overt he has committed, and then ask
him why it wasn't an overt, you will find that it wasn't an
overt and therefore didn't relieve as an answer because it
was all justified.

One of the powerful new overt processes (as given by me on
recent tapes) is: 1. In this lifetime what overt have you
committed?

2. How have you justified it?

2. is run flat until the overt given in 1. is knocked out.
Then a new overt is found and 2.

is done thoroughly and repetitively on it.

This is not a new form of process but these are very new commands.

Note it is not an alternate command. Note that a cycle of
action is completed with question 2. or 1. before you leave
off processing this particular overt. Only when you have
all the justifications and cognitions possible on 1. do you
ask for a new overt from the pc.

This cracks the general irresponsibility the auditor is met
with in trying to get O/W to benefit the irresponsible case.

&quot;In this lifetime&quot; is added because the pc who can't face
his overts not only justifies them but goes way back into
his past lives to find overts instead of getting off the
simple this lifetime ones.

This is not the same process as plain &quot;What have you done?&quot;
in which any action done by the pc is accepted as the answer.

However in simple general O/W you will find the pc is not
answering the auditing question but is answering &quot;What have
I done that caused my trouble?&quot; The pc is running &quot;What
action that I have done explains what has happened to me? &quot;

Therefore running justifications off is a further south
process than any earlier version of O/W and is very
effective in raising the Cause Level of the pc.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:nb.rd 
Copyright 1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

90. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 ETHICS CHITS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JULY 1965

Remimeo
Tech Div Hats
Qual Div Hats 
Ethics Hats 
Executive Hats

TECH DIVISION
QUAL DIVISION

ETHICS CHITS

This is a VERY important policy. When it is neglected the
org will soon experience a technical dropped statistic and
lose income and personnel.

The most attacked area of an org is its Tech and Qual
personnel as these produce the effective results which make
Scientology seem deadly to Suppressives.

The Suppressive is TERRIFIED of anyone getting better or
more powerful as he is dramatizing some long gone (but to
him it is right now) combat or vengeance. He or she
confuses the old enemies with anyone about and looks on
anyone who tries to help as an insidious villain who will
strengthen these &quot;enemies&quot;.

Thus Tech and Qual personnel are peculiarly liable to
covert, off line, off policy annoyances which in time turn
them into PTSs. Their cases will Roller Coaster and they
begin to go off line, off policy and off origin (see Dev-T
Pol Ltrs) themselves.

This results in a technical break down and an apparency of
busyness in these divisions which does not in fact produce
anything, being Dev-T.

The policy then is: NO TECH OR QUAL PERSONNEL MAY OMIT
GIVING ETHICS

CHITS TO ETHICS ON ANY INCIDENT OR ACTION COVERED IN THE DEV-T

POLICY LETTERS OR WHICH INDICATE SP OR PTS ACTIVITY.

This means they may not &quot;be decent about it&quot; or
&quot;reasonable&quot; and so refrain.

This means they must know their Ethics and Dev-T Pol Ltrs.

This means they may not themselves act like Ethics Officers
or steal the Ethics hat.

It means that they must chit students who bring a body and
ask for unusual solutions; they must chit all discourteous
conduct; they must chit all Roller Coaster cases; they must
chit all Suppressive actions observed; they must chit snide
comments; they must chit alter-is and entheta, they must
chit derogatory remarks; they must chit all Dev-T. Anything
in violation of Ethics or Dev-T Pol Ltrs must be reported.

Ethics will find then that only two or three people in
those areas are causing all the upset.

This fact routinely stuns Tech and Qual personnel when it
is called to their attention-that only two or three are
making their lives miserable.

Ethics, seeing tech statistics drop, must investigate all
this and WHEN ETHICS FINDS the Qual and Tech personnel have
not been handing in Ethics chits, the Ethics Officer must
report them to the HCO Exec Sec for disciplinary action.

NON ENTURBULATION ORDER

What to do with the 2 or 3 students or pcs causing trouble?



Ethics issues a Non Enturbulation Order. This states that
those named in it (the SPs and PTSs who are students or
preclears) are forbidden to enturbulate others and if one
more report is received of their enturbulating anyone, an
SP order will be issued forthwith.

This will hold them in line until tech can be gotten in on
them and takes them off the back of Tech and Qual personnel.

NOT THEORETICAL

This is not a theoretical situation or policy. It is issued
directly after seeing tech results go down, Tech and Qual
cases Roller Coaster and results drop.

Ethics found that the entire situation came about through
no chits from Tech and Qual personnel about troublesome
people which resulted in no restraint and a collapse of
Divisions 4 and 5 Comm lines and results.

When Tech and Qual personnel try to take the law into their
own hands, or ignore issuing Ethics chits, chaos results,
not case gains.

Keep Tech Results UP.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:mh.cden
Copyright  1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

91. HCOB   8 NOV 65 SUPPRESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 8 NOVEMBER 1965

Remimeo
Tech Personnel 
Tech Div
Qual Personnel 
Qual Div


SUPPRESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS

If you find a Suppressive on a case you will also find a
chronic problem.

A problem is postulate-counter-postulate.

When a person is faced with suppression he is facing a
counter-postulate.

A hidden standard is a problem a person thinks must be
resolved before auditing can be seen to have worked. It's a
standard by which to judge Scientology or auditing or the
auditor.

This hidden standard is always an old problem of long
duration. It is a postulate-counter-postulate situation-the
source of the counter-postulate was suppressive to the pc.

Therefore you can always find a Suppressive by finding a
pc's hidden standard and following it back to when it
began. You will find there a Suppressive to the pc.

Similarly if you trace back the persons and groups who have
been suppressive of the pc you will find a hidden standard
popping into view.

The datum is-a case that betters then worsens (a &quot;Roller
Coaster Case&quot; or a &quot;Roller Coaster&quot;) is always connected to
a suppressive person.

The Roller Coaster is caused by the hidden standard going
into action. &quot;My eyesight didn't get better.&quot; Locate a
present time Suppressive on the case and trace that
suppressive back to others earlier and you suddenly see the
pc brighten up and (apparently for no reason) state his
eyesight suddenly improved.

A case that betters and worsens (a Roller Coaster) is
always connected to a suppressive person and will not get
steady gain until the Suppressive is found on the case or
the basic suppressive person earlier.

Because the case doesn't get well he or she is a Potential
Trouble Source. To us, to others, to himself. You can't
successfully audit that pc because there is a hidden
standard. It makes the pc think he is no better.
Suppressives also suppress the pc just like that so long as
a hidden standard is present.

Find the Suppressive, make the pc handle or disconnect.
Then audit the pc up to Problems Release by getting rid of
the hidden standard and the basic suppressive.

Never audit a pc who is a Potential Trouble Source other
than on the infallible, never varied datum, a Roller
Coaster is always a PTS connected to an SP.

Note also that a person going clear is now a thetan with a
new view of life and has new hidden standards (requiring
the location of suppressives) which he had no reality on as
a Man or later as a Release.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH :ml.cden 
Copyright  1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************


