   
   CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 3/16


CLASS VIII COURSE PACK

CONTENTS:

Part 3

16. HCOB  29 JUL 81 FULL ASSIST CHECKLISTS FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES
17. HCOB   4 MAY 68 DIANETIC COURSES STUCK PICTURES
18. HCOB  20 MAY 68 OVERT-MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE
19. HCOB  28 AUG 68 DRUGS
20. HCOB  29 AUG 68 DRUG DATA
21. HCOB  26 AUG 78 r. 5 Oct 78 MORE ON DRUGS
22. HCOB  28 SEP 68 DIANETICS
23. HCOB  30 JUN 62 ARC PROCESS
24. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC STRAIGHT WIRE
25. HCOB  29 SEP 65 CYCLICAL AND NON-CYCLICAL PROCESS CONCLUSIONS
26. HCOB  14 OCT 68 DEFINITION OF RECALL
27. HCOB  10 DEC 64 SCIENTOLOGY 0 LISTEN STYLE AUDITING
28. HCOB   5 FEB 66 &quot;LETTING THE PC ITSA&quot;, THE PROPERLY TRAINED AUDITOR
29. HCOB  11 DEC 64 SCIENTOLOGY 0 PROCESSES


**************************************************

CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 3/16

**************************************************

16. HCOB 29 JUL 81 FULL ASSIST CHECKLISTS FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JULY 1981
ISSUE I

Remimeo 
Auditors
C/Ses 
Tech/Qual 

(Cancels BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLISTS FOR INJURIES
AND ILLNESSES which was incomplete and which failed to list 
the source references for running the processes listed on the 
checklists.)

FULL ASSIST CHECKLISTS FOR INJURIES AND ILLNESSES

REFERENCES:

ABILITY 73 TECHNICAL VOLUME III, pages 259-264

HCOB 29 Jul 81 II ADDITIONAL ASSIST PROCESSES AND DATA

HCOB 27 Jul 69 ANTIBIOTICS

HCOB 5 Jul 71RB C/S Series 49RB, ASSISTS Re-rev. 20.9.78

HCOB 11 Jul 73RB ASSIST SUMMARY Re-rev. 21.9.78

HCOB 23 Jul 71R ASSISTS Rev. 16.7.78

HCOB 21 Oct 71 ASSISTS IN SCIENTOLOGY Reiss. 21.9.74

B.T.B. 7 Apr 72R TOUCH ASSISTS, CORRECT ONES Rev. &amp; Reiss. 23.6.74

HCOB 24 Jul 69R SERIOUSLY ILL PCs Rev. 24.7.78

HCOB 31 Dec 78 II OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING

HCOB 2 Apr 69RA DIANETIC ASSISTS Rev. 28.7.78

HCOB 16 Aug 69R HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY Rev. 25.9.78

HCOB 15 Nov 78 DATING AND LOCATING

HCOB 15 Jul 70R UNRESOLVED PAINS Rev. 17.7.78

HCOB 23 Dec 71 Solo C/S Series 10, C/S Series 73, THE NO-INTERFERENCE AREA

HCOB 12 Mar 69 II PHYSICALLY ILL PCS AND PRE OTS

HCOB 4 Sep 68 &quot;Don't force a pc . . . .&quot;

HCOB 13 Jun 70 C/S Ser. 3, SESSION PRIORITIES REPAIR PGMS AND THEIR PRIORITY

HCOB 29 Mar 75R ANTI-BIOTICS, ADMINISTERING OF Rev. 23.10.78

HCOB 21 Feb 66 DEFINITION PROCESSES

TAPE 5406C17 6ACC-50A &amp; 50B ASSISTS

TAPE 5608C.. HPC A-18 CHRONIC SOMATIC

TAPE 5905C21 6LACC-6 CLEARING: PROCESS - SPECIAL CASES

TAPE 6110C03 SH SPEC 61 THE PRIOR CONFUSION

BOOK: DIANETICS 55!

IMPORTANT NOTE: DIANETICS IS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS, OTs AND DIANETIC
CLEARS, PER HCOB 12 Sep 78 DIANETICS FORBIDDEN ON CLEARS AND OTS.

___________

There is a tremendous amount that can be done mentally and
spiritually by an auditor to assist someone who is sick or
hurt. We have known for years in Dianetics and Scientology
that the tech of assists is very powerful and can work
miracles when correctly applied.

The purpose of this bulletin is to lay out the available
technology on assists for handling the ill or injured.

The processes presented in this issue are in checklist form
which will greatly aid the C/S and auditor in drawing up
and executing a proper assist program.

USING THE CHECKLISTS

In 1974 I developed the system of using a preliminary
assessment of the pc's condition and checklists as aids to
programming and C/Sing the case.

Attached to this bulletin are separate checklists which
list symptoms for both injuries and illnesses and one
comprehensive handling sheet which lists out the many
assist actions and their references one uses to handle either.

To use the checklists:

1. Look up the symptom or symptoms the pc may have on the
appropriate

preliminary assessment sheet (injury or illness). Below
each symptom are listed many possible handlings.

2. Look up the handlings on the handling sheet (which
covers handlings for both injuries and illnesses).

3. Use these handlings and their references in C/Sing the case.

4. Draw up the program and C/S.

5. The C/S can then circle the actions to be done on the
handling sheet and number them in sequence. The handling
sheet can be kept in the folder and signed off as each step
is done.

6. Audit the pc regularly until the illness, injury or
condition is handled.

C/SING AND PROGRAMMING

The Assist Summary bulletins were never intended to be used
as a rote sequence of handling assists, which vary based on
the circumstances of the pc.



It could be a serious mistake to simply robotically copy
down in order the handlings listed for the pc's symptoms
and then audit them on the pc.

One reason for this is that the case levels of people
differ. An OT with a sprained ankle would be handled
differently than a Dianetic pc with one.

Also, injuries and illnesses are two separate subjects and
are handled differently.

Therefore, data has to be gotten where available, from
medical reports, session reports, interviews and exam
statements, and the C/S has to understand the case before
him and program and C/S accordingly.

ANY ASSIST ACTION MUST BE SUITED TO THAT PC'S CASE AND CURRENT
CONDITION.

CAUTION

The injured or ill person is overwhelmed easily. One must
beware of keying the person in.

The operating basis is to take it easy on the pc and try
not to run anything too heavy on him. Going earlier similar
on 2WCs should be avoided as due to his condition E/S tends
to make the ill or injured pc dive back to the year zero.
This is more than a sick person can stand up to.

Along with.this, NEVER MISS AN F/N ON A SICK PERSON.

NOTE ON HIGH CRIMING REFERENCES

It well behooves any auditor or C/S to get his high crime
checkouts in PT for the assist actions listed in this
bulletin. The circumstances requiring assists often crop up
unexpectedly and a well prepared auditor will be more
successful than an unprepared one.

One would always do whatever one could to help a person in
difficulty regardless. Still, it is a matter of technical
integrity and professional pride that one would get his
high crime checkouts in PT for assist actions to his class.

______________

Factually, there is no group but ourselves which possesses
a body of technology to effectively assist the spiritual
condition of the ill or injured person. Our knowledge in
this area is considerable.

So don't skimp on your study and drilling of these
procedures and the theory behind them. You can do much to
relieve the misery suffered by the ill or injured.

With full understanding and application of assists you may
appear to others to be a miracle worker.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

LRH:RTC:bk
Copyright  1981
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT FOR ILLNESS/INJURIES

PC: _______________________________________________

DATE:_________________ 


1. SYMPTOM: ILL AND HAS DONE A BUNK.

HANDLINGS: 3, 2, 1, 4A/4B/4C, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K,
6M, 6N, 60, 6P, 6Q, 6R, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z,
6AA,6BB, 6CC, 6DD, 6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK,6LL,8A, 8C, 8D,
8E.


2. SYMPTOM: SEVERELY ILL AND CLOSE TO DEATH.

HANDLINGS: 1, 4A/4B/4C, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K, 6M, 6N,
60, 6P, 6Q, 6R, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z, 6AA, 6BB, 6CC,
6DD, 6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK, 6LL, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E.


3. SYMPTOM: SEVERELY ILL.

HANDLINGS: 1, 4A/4B/4C, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K, 6M, 6N,
60, 6P, 6Q, 6R, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z, 6AA, 6BB, 6CC,
6DD, 6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK, 6LL, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E.


4. SYMPTOM: ILL AND IN A COMA/UNCONSCIOUS.

HANDLINGS: 1, 4A/4B/9C, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K, 6M, 6N,
60, 6P, 6Q, 6R, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z, 6AA, 6BB, 6CC,
6DD, 6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK, 6LL, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E.


5. SYMPTOM: ILL AND IN A STATE OF SHOCK (OR WAS).

HANDLINGS: 1, 5, 4A/4B/4C, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K, 6M,
6N, 60, 6P, 6Q, 6R, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z, 6AA, 6BB,
6CC, 6DD, 6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK, 6LL, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E.


6. SYMPTOM: ILL AND IN PAIN/EXTREME DISCOMFORT.

HANDLINGS: 1, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K, 6M, 6N, 60, 6P,
6Q, 6R, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z, 6AA, 6BB, 6CC, 6DD,
6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK, 6LL, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E.


7. SYMPTOM: ILL WITH AN INFECTION/TEMPERATURE.

HANDLINGS: 1 (ANTIBIOTICS), 7, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K,
6M, 6N, 60, 6P 6R, 6Q, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z, 6AA,
6BB, 6CC, 6DD, 6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK, 6LL, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E.


8. SYMPTOM: ILL AND TAKING DRUGS.

HANDLINGS: 1, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6H, 6K, 6M, 6N, 60, 6P,
6Q, 6R, 6S, 6U, 6V, 6W, 6X, 6Y, 6Z, 6AA, 6BB, 6CC, 6DD,
6EE, 6FF, 6GG, 6HH, 6KK, 6LL, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E.


10. SYMPTOM: ILLNESS NOT HEALING.

HANDLINGS: 6V, 6DD, 6FF, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E, 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D.


11. SYMPTOM: ILL DURING/AFTER AUDITING.

HANDLING: 10.


12. SYMPTOM: AN OLD ILLNESS RECURRING (CHRONICALLY ILL).

HANDLINGS: 6V, 6FF, 8A, 8C, 8D, 8E, 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D.


13. SYMPTOM: ILL AND IN NO-INTERFERENCE AREA.

HANDLING: 14.


14. SYMPTOM: HIGH OR LO TA.

HANDLING: 13.


15. SYMPTOM: NOTHING WORKS

HANDLING: 9D.


16. CHILDREN SYMPTOM: PHYSICAL DEFECT OR PSYCHOSOMATIC ILLNESS

HANDLINGS: 1, 11B.


17. SYMPTOM: TIREDNESS.

HANDLING: 16.


HANDLINGS

l. MEDICAL TREATMENT

An assist is not a substitute for medical attention and
does not attempt to cure injuries requiring medical aid.
First, call the doctor. Then assist the person as you can.
(Ref. ABILITY 73 ASSISTS IN SCIENTOLOGY)

Medical examination and diagnosis should be sought where
needed, and where treatment is routinely successful,
medical treatment should be obtained. As an assist can at
times cover up an actual injury or broken bone, no chances
should be taken, especially if the condition does not
easily respond. In other words where something is merely
thought to be a slight sprain, to be on the safe side an
X-ray should be obtained, particularly if it does not at
once respond. An assist is not a substitute for medical
treatment but is complementary to it. It is even doubtful
if full healing can be accomplished by medical treatment
alone and it is certain that an assist greatly speeds
recovery. In short, one should realize that physical
healing does not take into account the being and the
repercussion on the spiritual beingness of the person.
(Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re- rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

2. FIRST AID AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL

Where you are giving an assist to one person, you put
things in the environment into an orderly state as the
first step, unless you are trying to stop a pumping
artery-- but here you would use First Aid. You should
understand that First Aid always precedes an assist. You
should look the situation over from the standpoint of how
much First Aid is required....

You may often have to find some method of controlling,
handling and directing personnel who get in your way before
you can render an assist. You might just as well realize
that an assist requires that you control the entire
environment and personnel associated with the assist if
necessary....

A good example of an assist would be when somebody is
washing dishes in the kitchen. There is a horrendous crash
and the person comes down all over the sink, hits the floor
as she is going down, she grabs the butcher knife as it
falls. You go in and say, &quot;Well, let me fix that up.&quot; One
of the first things you would have to do is to wind some
bandage around the hand to stop the bleeding. Part of the
First Aid would be to pick up the dishes and put them back
on the sink, sweep the pieces together into a more orderly
semblance. This is the first symptom of control. (Ref.
HCOB21 Oct 71 Reiss. 21.9.74 ASSISTS IN SCIENTOLOGY)

(This could include getting some assistance to ease
discomfort such as Epsom salt baths, liniment, changing
bandages, etc.)

3. IF A PERSON HAS DONE A BUNK

The preclear may do a compulsive exteriorization, &quot;do a
bunk, and drop his body limp in the chair and give from
that body no sign that he is hearing any of the auditing
commands given by the auditor. One such case was pleaded
with for half an hour by an auditor along the lines that
the preclear should remember her husband, should think of
her children, should come back and live for the sake of her
friends, and found no response from the preclear. Finally
the auditor said, &quot;Think of your poor auditor,&quot; at which
moment the preclear promptly returned. (Ref.

DIANETICS 55! Chapter XVI EXTERIORIZATION )


4. ASSISTS FOR SOMEONE UNCONSCIOUS OR IN A COMA

4.A &quot;YOU MAKE THAT BODY SIT ON THAT CHAIR.&quot; (OR &quot;LIE ON THAT
BED.&quot;) (Ref. HCOB 21 May 59 HGC ALLOWED PROCESSES AND ACC
PROCESSES AS OF MAY 21, 1959)

4.B Touch patient's hand to parts of the bed with &quot;FEEL
THAT (OBJECT).&quot; Ref. HCOB 27 Jul 69 ANTIBIOTICS)

4.C An unconscious pc can be audited off a meter by taking
his hand and having him touch nearby things like pillow,
floor, etc. or body without hurting an injured part.

A person in a coma for months can be brought around by
doing this daily. (Ref. HCOB 5 July 71RB Re-rev. 20.9.78, 
C/S Series 49RB, ASSISTS)


5. SHOCK OR CATATONIA

&quot;HERE. WHAT WORD DID I SAY TO YOU?&quot; 
&quot;HERE. WHAT WORD DID I SAY T0 YOU?&quot; 
The auditor keeps this up until all of a sudden the pc says, 
&quot;You said 'Here.'&quot; 
Then, &quot;REACH DOWN NOW AND FIND  THE FLOOR WITH YOUR HAND. PRESS IT&quot; 
(Ref. 5406C17 6ACC-50A &amp; 50B ASSISTS)


6. ASSISTS FOR ILLNESS OR INJURY

6A. INJURY

CONTACT ASSIST

Where possible and where indicated, until the person has
re-established his communication with the physical universe
site. To F/N. (Ref. HCOB 5 Jul 7lRB Re-rev. 20.9.78 C/S Series 
49RB ASSISTS, HCOB 2 Apr 69RA Rev. 28.8.78 DIANETIC ASSISTS)

6B. ILLNESS OR INJURY

TOUCH ASSIST

Until the person has re-established communication with the
physical part or parts affected. To F/N. 

(Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY, 
HCOB 21 Oct 71 Reiss.  21.9.74 ASSISTS IN SCIENTOLOGY, 
BTB 7 Apr 72 Rev. &amp; Reiss. 23.6.74 TOUCH ASSISTS CORRECT ONES)

6C. ILLNESS OR INJURY

HAVINGNESS

Running havingness in every assist session is vital. This
not only remedies havingness but also brings the preclear
to present time. 

(Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY, 
HCOB 7 Aug 78 HAVINGNESS FINDING AND RUNNING THE PC'S HAVINGNESS PROCESS, 
HCOB 6 Oct 60R Rev., 8.5.74 THIRTY SIX NEW PRESESSIONS)

6D. ILLNESS

He is explaining his illness by saying he needs attention
and he is using it as a service fac of some sort or
another, and you will find out this very often gives up if
you give him attention. Well, there are various ways to
give him attention.

Get him a nurse, get him a doctor, put him in a special
room, put him on arduously, awfully hard to maintain
schedules. You take a pink pill at 20 minutes after the
hour, three and one-half blue pills 45 minutes past the
hour, and then every hour on the hour take 7 green ones,
but skip every odd-numbered hour.

Attention then is given to it and he gets the idea it is
being as-ised. This makes him feel stronger and he will
start to as_is it himself and very often gets well simply
by giving him attention. There are various mechanisms to do
so. (Ref. 5905C21 6-LACC-6 CLEARING: PROCESS-SPECIAL CASES)

6E. ILLNESS OR INJURY

Run Reach and Withdraw from the affected area. (Ref. HCOB
24 Jul 69R Rev. 24.7.78 SERIOUSLY ILL PCs )

Reach and Withdraw can also be done on other body parts not
affected, the environment, the body itself, the location
where an injury occurred, the thing that injured the pc
(e.g. the knife that cut him). To EP of F/N, GIs. (Ref.
HCOB 29 Jul 81 II ADDITIONAL ASSIST PROCESSES AND DATA)

6F. ILLNESS OR INJURY

&quot;HELLO&quot; AND &quot;OKAY.&quot; (REF. P.A.B. No. 123 THE REALITY SCALE)

6G. INJURY

&quot;WHERE DID IT HAPPEN?,&quot; &quot;WHERE ARE YOU NOW?&quot; (Ref. ABILITY
110 TECHNIQUES OF CHILD PROCESSING, Technical Volume III, pp.
553-554)

6H. ILLNESS OR INJURY

&quot;FROM WHERE COULD YOU COMMUNICATE TO A (body part)?&quot; (To
F/N, Cog, VGIs.) (Ref. HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC ALLOWED PROCESSES)

6I. INJURY

&quot;LOOK AT THAT (object).&quot; &quot;DECIDE THE INJURY CANNOT HAVE IT.&quot;
EP- pain gone, Cog, F/N. (Ref. ABILITY 73 ASSISTS IN SCIENTOLOGY)

6J. INJURY

&quot;KEEP IT FROM GOING AWAY.&quot; (Ref. ABILITY 73 ASSISTS IN SCIENTOLOGY)

6K. ILLNESS

Run &quot;HOLD IT STILL&quot; on body parts until somatics blow.
(Ref. HC0B 29 Jul 81 II ADDITIONAL ASSIST PROCESSES AND DTTA)

6L. INJURY (IMPACT)

&quot;WHERE AREN'T YOU BEING ________ (e.g. &quot;hit&quot;)?&quot; Making sure he gets
these places with great certainty. As a result you will get
yourself quite a reduction in case. (Run to F/N, Cog,
VGIs.) (Ref. 5406C17 ASSISTS)

6M. ILLNESS

&quot;WHAT OTHER ILLNESSES COULD YOU HAVE?&quot; (Run repetitively to
F/N, Cog, VGIs.) (Ref. 5608C.. HPC A-18 CHRONIC SOMATIC)

6N. ILLNESS OR INJURY

Ask the pc &quot;GIVE ME ANOTHER PURPOSE FOR A (e.g. bad ear).&quot; (He
already assumes he's given you one. He's got a bad ear.)
You could ask him for a few more purposes. Have him dream
up a few more purposes and he'll feel much better. (Ref.
5608C..HPC A-18 CHRONIC SOMATIC)

60. ILLNESS

&quot;CAN YOU RECALL A TIME WHEN SOMEBODY ELSE HAD THAT
CONDITION?&quot; &quot;CAN YOU RECALL A TIME WHEN YOU DECIDED TO
HAVE THAT CONDITION?&quot; To F/N, GIs. (Ref. ABILITY MAGAZINE
MAJOR 4 of early July, 1955 entitled STRAIGHTWIRE A MANUAL 0F
OPERATION. Tech Volume II, pp. 216-239)

6P. ILLNESS OR INJURY

Fly Rudiments as follows: HANDLE ANY ARC BREAK that might have
existed at the time (a) with the environment, (b) with
another, (c) with others, (d) with himself, (e) with the
body part or the body, and (f) with any failure to recover
at once. Each to F/N.

HANDLE ANY PROBLEM the person may have had (a) at the time
of illness or injury, (b) subsequently due to his or her condition.
Each to F/N.

HANDLE ANY WITHHOLD (a) the person might have had at the
time, (b) any subsequent withhold, and (c) any having to withhold 
the body from work or others or the environment due to being 
physically unable to approach lt.

(Ref.HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

6Q. ILLNESS OR INJURY

LlC &quot;Concerning the illness______&quot; or &quot;Concerning the
injury/accident______&quot; Can also do LlC on the injured
member. (Ref. HCOB 23 Jul 71R Rev. 16 Jul 78 ASSISTS)

6R. ILLNESS

ASSESS THE AREA OF ILLNESS AND PREPCHECK ON THE AREA.
ALSO ONE CAN PREPCHECK THE BODY ITSELF. (Ref. HCOB 24 Jul
69R Rev. 24.7.78 SERIOUSLY ILL PCs )

6S. ILLNESS OR INJURY

RUN THE INCIDENT ITSELF Narrative R3RA Quad to erasure and full EP.

Interest is checked. It is understood here that Flow 1 was
the physical incident itself, not necessarily something
done to the person but as something that happened to him or
her. (Ref. HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II Re-rev. 15 Sep 78 NED
Series 6RA R3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, HCOB 28 Jul 71RA
re-rev. 22.9.78 C/S Series 54RA NED Series 8R DIANETICS, BEGINNING
A PC ON) NOTE: Dianetics is not run on Clears or OTs.

6T. INJURY

Date/Locate the injury. (Ref. HCOB 15 Nov 78 DATING AND LOCATING)

6U. ILLNESS OR INJURY

HANDLE ANY SECONDARY, which is to say emotional reactions,
stresses or shocks before, during or after the situation. Narrative
Secondaries are run R3RA Narrative Quad. Interest is checked. It 
is important to get the earliest beginning of the incident and to
continue to check for earlier beginning each run through.
(Ref. HCOB 26 Jun 78RA II Re-rev. 15.9.78 NED Series 6RA R3RA

ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS, HCOB 28 Jun 78RA Re- rev. 15.9.78
NED Series 7RA R3RA COMMANDS, HCOB 28 Jul 71RA Re-rev. 22.9.78
C/S Series 54RA, NED Series 8R DIANETICS, BEGINNING A PC ON,
HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY) 

NOTE: Dianetics is not run on Clears or OTs.

6V. ILLNESS OR INJURY

PREASSESS THE INCIDENT and take to a full Dianetic EP all somatics
connected with the incident in which the pc is interested.
(Ref. HCOB 18 Jun 78R Rev. 20.9.78 NED Series 4R ASSESSMENT
AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM and the issues referenced in 6U above) 

NOTE: Dianetics is not run on Clears or OTs.

6W. ILLNESS OR INJURY

Check if the area was audited before on R3RA.

If so, L3RG; to F/N list on lt. (Ref. HCOB 29Jul 81 II
ADDITIONAL ASSIST PROCESSES AND DATA)

6X. ILLNESS OR INJURY

If pc has a Service Fac or Evil Purpose behind it, R3RA
Quad. Note: Dianetics is not run on Clears and OTs. (Ref.
HCOB 29 Jul 81 II ADDITIONAL ASSIST PROCESSES AND DATA)

6Y. ILLNESS OR INJURY

POSTULATE TWO-WAY COMM. To F/N. Not E/S. (Ref. HCOB 11 Jul
73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

6Z. ILLNESS OR INJURY

PRIOR CONFUSION. By 2-way comm see if a confusion existed
prior to the accident, injury or illness. To F/N. Not E/S. 
(Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

6AA. ILLNESS OR INJURY

MYSTERY POINT. 2wc any mysterious aspect of the incident to F/N Cog
VGIs. Not E/S. (Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST
SUMMARY)

6BB. ILLNESS OR INJURY

2WC AGREEMENT: Get any agreement the person may have had in or with
the incident. Not E/S. (Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 12.9.78 ASSIST
SUMMARY)

6CC. ILLNESS OR INJURY

PROTEST: 2wc any protest in the incident. Not E/S. (Ref.
HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

6DD. ILLNESS OR INJURY

PREDICTION: 2wc (a) How long he/she expects to take to
recover. (b) Get the person to tell you any predictions
others have made about it. 2wc it to an F/N Cog VGIs. (Ref.
HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

6EE. ILLNESS

LOSSES. 2wc anything the pc may have lost to F/N. Not E/S.
(Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY, HCOB
29 Mar 65 ALL LEVELS ARC BREAKS)

6FF. ILL OR INJURED WITH FIXED PICTURE

BEFORE-AFTER: Where an injured or ill pc is so stuck that
he has a fixed picture that does not move, one can jar it
loose by asking him to recall a time before the incident
and then asking him to recall a time after it. This will
&quot;jar the engram loose&quot; and change the stuck point. (Ref.
HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

6GG. ILLNESS OR INJURY

Have the numb, painful or injured area say &quot;THERE IS
SOMETHING HERE, THERE IS NOTHING HERE&quot; having it then say, 
&quot;THERE IS SOMETHING THERE, THERE IS NOTHING THERE&quot; having 
the preclear say about the area, &quot;THERE IS SOMETHING THERE, 
THERE IS NOTHING THERE,&quot;and then the preclear about himself, 
&quot;THERE IS SOMETHING HERE, THERE IS NOTHING HERE.&quot; This makes a 
complete bracket. (Run to Pain gone, Cog, F/N.) (Ref. THE 
JOURNAL 0F SCIENTOLOGY 16-G THIS IS SCIENTOLOGY THE SCIENCE 
OF CERTAINTY VOL 1 PAGE 388 OF TECHNICAL VOLUMES 

6HH. ILL OR INJURED AND WAS IN A SMALL ROOM FOR A LONG TIME

The gradient scale of taking people into larger and larger
spaces was an early one. An individual has been lying in
this small room. He's very ill. He's been lying in this
small room for days and days and you're going to process him.

Just get him into a little bit larger space. The tremendous
tiredness he will experience is just giving him a little
more space and a greater remoteness of wall. You take him
out of his room into a larger room, he will start to

experience tiredness. If you did that every day, and you
gave him a little more space every day and gradiently
scaled him up the line a little bit more and a little bit
more, the individual would snap out of lt. It's quite
interesting because what you re doing is giving him a
gradient scale of larger spaces to confront. Just don't
give it to him with such steep doses that he finds them
unconfrontable and you've got it made. (Ref. 5904C23 SH PA
20 THEORY OF PROCESSES)

6II. INJURY

Where a person is injured, given a contact or touch assist
and then medical examination and treatment, he is given the
remainder as soon as he is able to be audited. The drug
&quot;five days&quot; does not need to apply. But where the person
has been given an assist over drugs, one must later come
back to the case when he is off drugs and run the drug part
out or make sure that nothing was submerged by the drugs.
(Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST

SUMMARY, HCOB 15 Jul 71RC III Re-rev. 31.1.79 C/S Series 48RD NED
SERIES 9RB drug handling AND HCOB 19 MAY 69RB RE-REV. 14.11.78
DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES PRIOR ASSESSING)

6JJ. INJURY

&quot;SPOT THE SPOT WHERE YOU WERE INJURED.&quot; &quot;SPOT A SPOT
OUTSIDE (the house, etc.)&quot; or &quot;...AWAY FROM (the gate, etc.).&quot; Run
alternate repetitive until pc exteriorizes or something
blows. (Ref. HCOB 29 Jul 81 II ADDITIONAL ASSIST PROCESSES
AND DATA)

6KK. ILLNESS OR INJURY

Fly Ruds before the illness or injury. (can be done Quad.)
(Ref. HCOB 24 Jul 69R Rev. 24 Jul 78 SERIOUSLY ILL PCS)


6LL. ILLNESS OR INJURY 

PREPCHECK THE PRIOR CONFUSION TO THE ILLNESS OR THE
ACCIDENT/INJURY. NOTE: Do not Prepcheck the illness itself or
accident/injury itself. (Ref. HCOB 9 Nov 61 THE PROBLEMS INTENSIVE
USE 0F THE PRIOR CONFUSION, HCOB 7 Sep 78R Rev. 21.10.78
MODERN REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING. Also 6110C03 SH SPEC 51,
THE PRIOR CONFUSION)


7. HIGH TEMPERATURE

When illness is accompanied by temperature, anti- biotics
is usually the first thought.

Then Fly all Ruds and do a Temperature Assist Version A or
Version B. (Ref. HCOB 23 Jul 71R Rev. 16.7.78 ASSISTS, HCOB
24 Aug 71 II ASSISTS ADDITION, HCOB 29 Mar 75R Rev. 23 Oct 78 
ANTI- BIOTICS, ADMINISTERING OF)


8. PTS HANDLINGS

8A. ILLNESS OR INJURED

The PTS C/S-1, given in HCOB 31 Dec 78 III EDUCATING THE
POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE, THE FIRST STEP TOWARD
HANDLING: PTS C/S-l must be done before any other PTS
handling is begun.

(Ref. HCOB 21 Dec 78 II OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING)

8B. INJURY

SUPPRESSIVE PRESENCE: 2wc any suppresive or invalidative
presence that may have caused a mistake to be made or the accident 
to occur, (To F/N Cog VGIs.) (Not E/S.) (Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB
Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY)

8C. ILLNESS OR INJURY

A metered PTS interview per HCOB 24 Apr 71 I, C/S Series 79, PTS
INTERVIEWS or a &quot;10 August Handling&quot; per HCOB 10 Aug 73 PTS
HANDLING done by an auditor in session or an MAA, D of P or
SSO will, in most cases, assist the person to spot the
antagonistic or SP element. Once spotted, the potential
trouble source can be assisted in working out a handling
for that terminal. (Ref. HCOB 31 Dec 78 II OUTLINE OF PTS
HANDLING)

8D. ILLNESS OR INJURY

3 S &amp; Ds per HCOB 16 Aug 69R Rev. 25.9.78 HANDLING ILLNESS IN
SCIENTOLOGY.

8E. ILLNESS OR INJURY

RUDIMENTS: Flying ruds and overts triple orquad flow on the
antagonistic terminal is often done to &quot;get ruds in&quot; and
enable the pc to better confront the PTS situation he is
facedwith. This would, of course, be done only in session
by a qualified auditor when so ordered by the Case
Supervisor. (Ref. HCOB 31 Dec 78 Issue II OUTLINE 0F PTS
HANDLING)

9. UNRESOLVING CONDITION

9.A WAS AUDITED WHILE ON DRUGS

Where a person is injured, given a contact or touch assist
and then medical examination and treatment, he is given the
remainder as soon as he is able to be audited. The drug
&quot;five days&quot; does not need to apply. But where the person
has been given an assist over drugs, one must later come
back to the case when he is off drugs and run the drug part
out or at least make sure that nothing was submerged by the
drugs. It is not uncommon for a person to be oblivious to
certain parts of a treatment or operation at the time of
initial auditing, only to have a missing piece of the
incident pop up days, months or even years later.

THIS is the reason injuries or operations occasionally seem
to persist despite a full assist: a piece of it was left
unhandled due to a drugged condition during the operation;
such bits may come off unexpectedly in routine auditing on
some other apparently disrelated chain. (Ref. HCOB 11 Jul
73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY, HCOB 15 Jul 71RC III
Re-rev. 31.1.79 C/S Series 48RD NED series 9RB DRUG HANDLING 
and HCOB 19 May 69RB Re-rev. 14.11.78 DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES 
PRIOR ASSESSING)

9B. UNRESOLVED PAINS

Where you can't fully repair a crippled left leg, don't be
surprised to find it was the right leg that was hurt. You
audit the left leg somatic in vain. If you do, start
auditing somatics in the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE BODY.... This
is also true for toothaches. Look at the pc's mouth. Has
the RIGHT upper molar ever been pulled or injured? Yes.
That's how the left molar began to decay. The right upper
molar was pulled. The pain (especially under the painkiller
on the right side only) backed up and stopped on the
opposite side. Eventually the left upper molar, under that
stress a year or ten later, caves in and aches. (Ref. HCOB
15 Jul 70R Rev.17.7.78 UNRESOLVED PAINS)

9C. ILLNESS OR INJURY

Check if any L&amp;N done in connection with the area, verify
or correct the lists.

NOTHING PRODUCES AS MUCH CASE UPSET AS A WRONG LIST
ITEM OR A WRONG LIST. Nothing else produces such a sharp
deterioration in a case or even illness (Ref. HCOB 20 April 72 
II C/S Series 78 PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION)

9D. NOTHING WORKING - ILL OR INJURED

&quot;WHAT COULD BE WORSE THAN ( the condition of the pc )&quot; Run
respectively. Skip the F/Ns, just keep this one going until
the pc gets well.

(Ref. HCOB 29 Jul 81 II ADDITIONAL ASSIST PROCESSES AND DATA)


10. ILLNESS OR INJURY DURING/AFTER AUDITING

Repair the earlier auditing with the appropriate correction
list and/or GF M5 as soon as possible.

It can occur that a pc gets ill after being audited where
the &quot;auditing&quot; is out-tech.When this occurs or is
suspected, a Green Form should be assessed only by an
auditor who can meter and whose TR 1 gets reads. The GF
reads are then handled. Out interiorization, bad lists, missed 
W/Hs, ARC Breaks and incomplete or flubbed engrams are the 
commonest errors. (Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST 
SUMMARY)


11. ASSISTS FOR A CHILD

11A. INJURED CHILD

&quot;WHERE DID IT HAPPEN?,&quot; &quot;WHERE ARE YOU NOW?&quot; (Ref. ABILITY
110 TECHNIQUES 0F CHILD PROCESSING Technical Volume III pp. 553-
554)

11B. CHILD WITH PHYSICAL DEFECT OR PSYCHOSOMATIC ILLNESS

&quot;FEEL MY ARM&quot; &quot;THANK YOU,&quot; &quot;FEEL YOUR ARM,&quot; &quot;THANK YOU,&quot;
and so on, using common body parts. (Ref. ABILITY 110 TECHNIQUES OF
CHILD PROCESSING Technical Volume III pp. 553-554)


12. PREGNANCY

A pregnant woman should have a full Preassessment done on
birth and babies before delivery. Immediately after
delivery the incident itself should be run out Narrative
R3RA Quad and Preassessed if necessary. (Ref. HCOB 15 Jan
70 THE USES OF AUDITING, HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78
ASSIST SUMMARY)

NOTE: Pregnant woman are not to be audited or audit, for
the sixth month up, from Power on up the Grade Chart. It is
very common for pregnant mothers to be audited and to audit
on New Era Dianetics and is in fact vital. NOTE: Dianetics
is not run on Clears or OTs.


13. HIGH OR LOW TA

A C/S 53RL should be used to get the TA under control
during assists if it cannot be gotten down. It must be done
by an auditor who knows how to meter and can get reads.
(Ref. HCOB 11 Jul 73RB Re-rev. 21.9.78 ASSIST SUMMARY) NOTE:

Additional references applicable to this situation are HCOB
10 Dec 76RB Re- rev. 25.5.80 URGENT - IMPORTANT C/S Series 99RB 
SCIENTOLOGY F/N AND TA POSITION and HCOB 2 Dec 80 FLOATING NEEDLE 
AND TA POSITION MODIFIED.)


14. ILL OR INJURED IN NO INTERFERENCE AREA

Assess and handle the correction list for the Advanced
Course level he is on or just completed as soon as
possible. (Ref. HCOB 23 Dec 71 Solo C/S Series 10 C/S
Series 73 THE NON-INTERFERENCE AREA)


15. ACCIDENT PRONE

Run a full battery of Objectives (CCHs, SCS, SOP 8-C, Op
Pro by Dup, etc.) or put the person through the Survival
Rundown. (Ref. HCOB 12 Jun 70 C/S Series 2 PROGRAMMING OF
CASES)


16. TIREDNESS

Do a purpose list as follows: &quot;WHAT PURPOSE HAS BEEN BLUNTED?&quot; (You 
can also use &quot;abandoned&quot; if it reads better.) (Ref. HCOB 15 Sep
68 &quot;Pc looking or continually...&quot;) Tiredness is technically
BLUNTED PURPOSE.The most effective way to handle this is by
overt- motivator engram. (Ref. HCOB 8 Sep 71R Rev. 20.5.75
CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS)

**************

17. HCOB   4 MAY 68 DIANETIC COURSES STUCK PICTURES


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MAY 1968

Remimeo

DIANETIC COURSES

STUCK PICTURES

A picture is stuck because of-

(a) An effort to withdraw from it or something in it.

(b) An effort to stop or stop something in it.

(c) A stop-withdraw combination.

(d) An effort to suppress the picture or something in it.

(e) An effort to invalidate the picture or something in it.

(f) A protest against the picture or its content.

(g) An effort to hold on to the picture.

(h) An ARC Break about the picture.

(i) A Present Time Problem about the picture.

(j) An overt picture of which the stuck one is the motivator.

(k) Too late on the chain of similar pictures.

Long before one gets to (k) it should have blown.

One should have had good luck running engrams himself
before being very expert on others.

The above also applies to secondaries.

Engrams which go solid when you try to run them are too
late on the chain, really.

If you run too far back you get a preclear into masses he
can't easily handle.

A pc should never be forced into or through engrams. If he
has a struggle he should be running locks.

Reality on engrams increases in ratio to the charge taken
off the case.

In handling the above (a) to (k) you use (a) to run through
until the needle doesn't react, then (b) through. Then (c)
through. And so on. One at a time.

Although I say stuck picture, you can use the above on any
engram, particularly if one &quot;hangs up&quot; in some portion.

Good running.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jc.pw.rd 
Copyright  1968 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

18. HCOB  20 MAY 68 OVERT-MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 MAY 1968
CORRECTED &amp; REISSUED MARCH 1974
(Only change is in this type sty/e)

Remimeo

OVERT-MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE

DIANETICS COURSES
LEVEL TWO
SOLO AUDIT
OT SECTIONS

There was an important discovery made in 1952 on the
subject of engrams which did not get included in &quot;Book
One&quot;, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health.

This was the &quot;Overt-Motivator sequence of ENGRAMS&quot;.

AN OVERT, in Dianetics and Scientology, is an aggressive or
destructive ACT by the individual against one or another of
the 8 dynamics (self, family, group, Mankind, animals or
plants, MEST, Life or the Infinite).

A MOTIVATOR is an aggressive or destructive act received by
the person or one of the dynamics.

The viewpoint from which the act is viewed resolves whether
the act is an overt or a motivator.

The reason it is called a &quot;Motivator&quot; is because it tends
to prompt that one pays it back-it &quot;motivates&quot; a new overt.

When one has done something bad to someone or something one
tends to believe it must have been &quot;motivated&quot;.

When one has received something bad, he also may tend to
feel he must have done something to deserve it.

The above points are true. The actions and reactions of
people on the subject are often very falsified.

People go about believing they were in an auto accident
when in actual fact they caused one.

Also people may believe they caused an accident when they
were only in one.

Some people, on hearing of a death, at once believe they
must have killed the person even though they were far away.

Police in large cities have people turn up and confess to
almost every murder as a routine.

One doesn't have to be crazy to be subject to the
Overt-Motivator sequence. It is not only used on him
continually by others, it also is a basic part of his own
&quot;case&quot;.

There are two extreme stages of Overt-Motivator phenomena.
One is a person who gives up only motivators (always done
to him) and the other is the person who &quot;has done only
overts&quot; (done to others).

In running engrams you will find

1. All overt engrams that hang up (won't audit easily) have
also a motivator engram as the same or different incident.

2. All motivator engrams that hang up have an overt engram
in the same or different incident.

The two types of engrams then are OVERT Engrams and
MOTIVATOR Engrams.

Example of Overt Engram-SHOOTING A DOG.

Example of Motivator Engram-BEING BITTEN BY A DOG.

The rule is that the SUBJECT MATTER MUST BE SIMILAR.

They can be in different points in time.

When you can't run out (erase) a dog bite engram, why then
you find the &quot;shoot dog&quot; engram.

PSYCHOSOMATIC ILLS OR ABERRATIONS THAT DO NOT RESOLVE BY
RUNNING ONE SIDE, USUALLY RESOLVE BY FINDING AND RUNNING THE
OTHER.

When you can't erase an engram about shooting a dog, why
then there's a bitten by dog.

It's all very simple really. There are always two sides to
the coin. If one won't run, you try the other.

BASICS

Finding the basic engram on a chain also applies to finding
the basic overt or basic motivator engram.

Engrams then hang up (won't run out) when

(a) The other type needs to be run and

(b) The one found has earlier engrams on it.

NONEXTANT ENGRAMS

An &quot;engram&quot; sometimes didn't exist. A pc can be trying to
run being run over by a car when he never was. What needs
to be done, when the incident won't run, is get the pc's
incident of running over somebody. It also works in
reverse. A pc can be trying to run an engram of running
over somebody when he was in fact only run over himself and
never did run over anyone.

So BOTH engrams can exist and be run or only one side
exists and can be run or with a heavy foul-up on overts and
motivators, one side can be non-factual and won't run
because only the other side exists.

It is easy to visualize this as a matter of flows. An overt
of course is an Outflow and a motivator is an Inflow.

SECONDARIES

It may never have been said that secondaries always sit
squarely on incidents of actual pain and unconsciousness.

Also secondaries can exist on the overt-motivator sequence
pattern just as in engrams.

This is the cause of frozen emotions or &quot;unemotional&quot;
people. Also some people complain they can't feel anymore.

This works out by overt-motivator sequence. A person in
grief over loss (grief is always loss) who then can't run
it has caused grief and that overt-secondary can be run.

Also a person misemotional over causing grief has been
caused grief. It works both ways with ALL POINTS ON THE
TONE SCALE.

The last is a newer discovery and wasn't known to early
Dianeticists.

The Overt-Motivator Engram phenomena did not receive
adequate dissemination. The principle applied to
secondaries has not before been released. It is basically
Dianetic Engram running that resolves all cases in the end
so one had better be pretty good at auditing Engrams and
Secondaries, Motivator and Overt both.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.nt.cdenjh 
Copyright  1968, 1974 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

19. HCOB  28 AUG 68 DRUGS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 28 AUGUST 1968

Issue II

Remimeo

FO

DRUGS

(Note: Drug taking has become very common
in the West, pushed by psychiatrists.)

It is possible to come off drugs without convulsions.

Drugs essentially are poisons. The degree they are taken
determines the effect. A small amount gives a stimulant. A
greater amount acts as a sedative. A larger amount acts as
a poison and can kill one dead.

This is true of any drug. Each has a different amount.
Caffeine is a drug. So Coffee is an example. 100 cups of
coffee would probably kill a person. 10 cups would probably
put him to sleep. 2 or 3 cups stimulates. This is a very
common drug. It is not very harmful as it takes so much of
it to have an effect so it is known as a stimulant.

Arsenic is known as a poison. Yet a tiny amount of arsenic
is a stimulant, a good sized dose puts one to sleep and a
few grains kills one dead.

But there are some drugs which have another factor. They
directly affect the reactive bank. Marijuana (pot), peyote,
morphine, heroin, etc. turn on the pictures one is stuck
in. And they turn them on too hard to audit out.

LSD-25 is a psychiatric drug designed to make
schizophrenics out of normal people. It is evidently widely
distributed by psychiatrists. It looks like cube sugar and
is easily made.

Drugs are considered valuable by addicts to the degree that
they produce some &quot;desirable effect&quot;.

But they are dangerous to those around because a person on drugs

(a) has blank periods

(b) has unrealities and delusions that remove him from PT

(c) is very hard to audit.

Thus a drug taker can be holding a boat alongside, go into
one of his blanks, think he is on Venus and let go.

A drug taker left on watch may go blank and miss a menacing
situation and not handle it because he is &quot;somewhere else&quot;.

Giving an order to a drug taker can be grim as he may
simply stand and stare at one. He ARC breaks anyone with it.

It takes about six weeks apparently for LSD to wear off.
After that a person can be audited. But it ruins his case
to a marked degree as it builds up ridges which don't as-is
well.

A drug or alcohol burns up the Vitamin B1 in the system
rapidly. This increased speed of burning up B1 adds to his
&quot;happy state&quot;. But now his system is out of B1 so he goes
depressed.

To avoid convulsions take lots of B1 daily when coming off drugs.

And wait for six weeks before one is audited.

And then lay off. It's a pretty poor trick on those who are
dependent on one and get let down.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.ei.rd 
Copyright 1968 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

20. HCOB  29 AUG 68 DRUG DATA


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 29 AUGUST 1968

Remimeo

(Corrected &amp; reissued 10 June 1975
as contained a misprint in para 4)

DRUG DATA

LSD-25 is a colourless, odourless, tasteless and virtually
undetectable derivative of a rye mould called ergot. The
use of sugar cubes as a medium was discontinued several
years ago.

Dosage is fantastically small, 50 to 1000 micrograms per
dose, so capsules and tablets are used to reduce
evaporation. Price varies from 3 to 7 dollars and it is
only sold on the black market.

Prior to 1964 the drug was administered by psychologists
and psychiatrists. However, it is now illegal for them to
do so. Despite its illegal status, LSD is very popular
among teenagers and college students. An entire sub-culture
of psychedelic (mind-manifesting) posters, light shows, and
electronic music has emerged on the West Coast. Most of the
Pop music has hidden drug references. A recent survey
indicated that over 50% of the students graduating from the
Los Angeles City School System had tried either LSD or
marijuana.

Marijuana is the most popular of the psychedelic drugs. One
ounce may be readily purchased for $10 and will furnish
30-50 cigarettes or &quot;joints&quot;. A smoker quickly progresses
from the one ounce &quot;lids&quot; to purchasing a &quot;brick&quot; or
&quot;kilo&quot;. This is a kilogram (2.2 lbs) and sells for $75 to
$150. Marijuana may be easily identified. It has a strong
characteristic odour which is similar to fresh hay or wet,
freshly cut grass. Smoking some tea leaves, rolled up into
a cigarette will give you a good stable datum for
identifying marijuana odour. Marijuana may be physically
identified as a green or greenish brown tobacco with
varying amounts of brown stems and small round seeds.

Hashish, like marijuana, comes from the female hemp plant,
Cannabis sativa. When matured, the plant is hung upside
down and resins collect which are dried into hashish. One
gram of hashish sells for $10 and will supply 10 to 30
&quot;hits&quot; or periods of being &quot;high&quot;.

Hashish is brown, tan, or black and is usually kept in tin
foil. Users of both hashish and marijuana will have
bloodshot eyes while under the influence. Someone under LSD
may be identified by very dilated pupils.

Peyote &quot;buttons&quot; are several inches in diameter and come
from the peyote cactus of S.W.

America. The pure form of the drug is a synthetic (white)
or natural (brown) powder called mescaline. A beefed-up
version of this drug was recently made available but was,
as of June 1968, unnamed.

Another new drug is STP. This drug is much more powerful
than even LSD. As of June 1968, STP was waning in use as
people found its results too unpredictable.

One other drug worth mentioning is DMT. This drug is smoked
or injected and has immediate effects which end in about an
hour. It may be identified by an odour similar to moth
balls and is either a white powder or soaked into a medium
such as pot or tobacco.

Marijuana is basically a very mild drug which creates
euphoria. Also it has the unpleasant consequence of
distorting the senses of the user to the point that people
on &quot;trips&quot; have been known to open the door of a car going
80 mph and step out &quot;since they could walk faster&quot;.

The remaining psychedelic drugs are much more powerful and
will strongly influence a pc.

It was found in L.A. that over a period of several months
(4-6) every single income slump was traced to the
accidental acceptance of one or more drug (LSD, etc) users
into the Academy and/or HGC and traced as well to the
spreading waves of chaos in attempts to handle their
&quot;disagreements&quot; with the tech, demands for special handling
and no case gain.

The &quot;trips&quot; that a drug user goes on tend to produce stuck
points on the track with much fixation of attention on that
area. Bad &quot;trips&quot; tend to act like Super Engrams collapsing
the track at that point.

Users of drugs cannot as-is, do not get TA, nor do they
have cognitions.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt.rdjh
Copyright  1968, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

21. HCOB  26 AUG 78 r. 5 Oct 78 MORE ON DRUGS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 26 AUGUST 1978R
REVISED 5 OCTOBER 1978
(Revisions in this type style)

Remimeo

MORE ON DRUGS

Drug users are apparently sitting on the idea that if
you're numb nothing can hurt you and it's probably a
defense against the physical universe. That's probably why
Objectives pull them out of it.

Drugs are an impression of fear on the physical universe
and what it might do to a person.

That is why Objectives work. It reassures them they aren't
going to get hit.

That's the ambition of the drug culture.

There are several more sensible ways of handling the same problem.

The first of these is exteriorization. One exteriorizes
before the impact. Yet drugs often make it impossible to
exteriorize.

A second way is to simply control the nerves so they don't
transmit.

A third is not to be in such a protest against pain as it
increases the intensity of the thing.

It is a fact that pain is a sort of havingness and if a
person is processed on wasting and having pain he finds it
is just another sensation and he can have it and doesn't
need these other remedies and that it is not that much of a
problem.

There are other unwanted sensations that drugs block off
but there is a whole sector of desirable sensations and
drugs block off all sensations. In spite of the propaganda
to the contrary even sexual sensation is blocked off with
drugs and this is true even after drugs have apparently
heightened it for one or two times, after that it is dead,
dead, dead.

The only brief that can be held out for drugs is that they
give a short quick oblivion from immediate agony and permit
the handling of a person to effect repair. But even then
this is applicable to persons who have no other system to
handle their pain.

Dexterity, ability and alertness are the main things that
prevent getting into painful situations and a primary
target of these all vanish with drugs. So drugs set you up
to get into situations which are truly disastrous and keep
you that way.

One has a choice between being dead with drugs or being
alive without them. Drugs rob life of the sensations and
joys which are the only reasons for living anyhow.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:gi.dr
Copyright  1978
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

22. HCOB 28 SEP 68 DIANETICS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 28 SEPTEMBER 1968

Remimeo

Class VIII

DIANETICS

The most incredible part of the auditing period preceding
Sept 1968 was that auditors, calling themselves such,
actually could forget, mislay and abandon secondary and
engram running as a skill.

A secondary or engram can key out or key in at will. They
don't stay out, which makes a release a release. The very
definition of Release is based on this fact. A Clear has
nothing to key in again. A Release does.

When you only straight wire a secondary or engram THAT IS
RECURRING (restims because of environment) you don't get a
lasting result.

This lifetime secondaries and engrams should be nun to F/N,
not coaxed to F/N by a recall process.

Anybody can run a secondary or engram. It's pie.

The only liability in running them in chains was omitted
from the Dianetic Auditor's handbook for some reason. It's
in Book One.

IF A SECONDARY OR ENGRAM GOES SOLID OR WON'T DISCHARGE, you find
the earlier similar one and run it. Give it only two times
through if it is going solid, then try earlier. Finally
Basic will emerge and run cleanly.

Miracles are contained in this action. But a modern (pre
Sept 68) auditor never thinks to check it even. They just
straight wire or get it recalled to F/N. And think they've
done it.

A recent death loss will not really resolve unless the
secondary is run properly and completely.

There are 2 F/Ns available - one by key-out, one by erasure.
Don't run a keying out process to F/N and then run it. Run
it in the first place if it's a serious recent secondary or
engram.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.rd
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

23. HCOB  30 JUN 62 ARC PROCESS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JUNE 1962

Central Orgs

Tech Depts

ARC PROCESS

The ARC Straight wire process now used in training is the old

Recall a time.........

This is hereby changed for the following reason:

Students and co-audit pcs go out of session when permitted
to answer only &quot;yes&quot; to the command, as two-way comm is
deleted and the definition of &quot;In Session&quot; is violated.

With the advent of Repetitive Rudiments the student should
be otherwise (and better) trained on a repetitive process.

A second question is thereby added to the ARC process and
any co-audit process that can be answered merely &quot;yes&quot;.

The new process:

RECALL A COMMUNICATION. WHAT WAS IT?

RECALL SOMETHING REAL. WHAT WAS IT?

RECALL AN EMOTION. WHAT WAS IT?

Do not use the older versions or any process that can be
answered only with &quot;yes&quot; without adding the second question.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:dr.rd.bh
Copyright  1962
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

24. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC STRAIGHT WIRE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1968
Issue II

Remimeo
All Dianetic Courses


ARC STRAIGHT WIRE

(Corrects HCO B 30 June 1962 and also
in the HDA Course book. Corrects p. 102
[soft-cover edition] of Self Analysis.)

(Paste over HDA Course page 15.)

(Corrects earlier HCO B of same date &amp; title.)

The correct commands for ARC Straight Wire, as researched
and as successful in test in cracking even neurotic cases,
with one command added to modernize it, were and are:
Recall a time that was really real to you.

Recall a time you were in good communication with someone.

Recall a time you really felt affinity for someone.

Recall a time you knew you understood something.

Run ONLY on a Meter.

Run ONLY to Floating Needle and NOT beyond. (Don't abruptly
cut pc's Comm.) A true fact is that ARC always must precede
an ARC Break.

Also ARC = Understanding and Time.

A = Space and the willingness to occupy the same space of.

R = Mass or agreement.

C = Energy or Recognition.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jp.ei.rd
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

25. HCOB  29 SEP 65 CYCLICAL AND NON-CYCLICAL PROCESS CONCLUSIONS


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1965

Remimeo
All Students
Saint Hill Courses
All staff

CYCLICAL AND NON-CYCLICAL PROCESS CONCLUSIONS


A Non-Cyclical Process (i.e. a repetitive process which
does not cause the preclear to cycle on the Time Track) is
concluded precisely as stated in HCO Bulletin 3 July 1 965.

A Cyclic Process-a repetitive process which does cause the
preclear to cycle on the Time Track as in Recall type
processes-must be concluded in Model Session as follows
&quot;Where are you now on the Time Track?&quot;

&quot;I will continue this process until you are close to
present time.&quot; (After each command ask &quot;When?&quot;) When the pc
is in PT, &quot;That was the body of the session.&quot;

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH: ml.rd
Copyright  1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

26. HCOB  14 OCT 68 DEFINITION OF RECALL


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 14 OCTOBER 1968
Issue II

Remimeo

DEFINITION OF RECALL

The definition of Recall as given in the Scientology
Dictionary is incorrect.

Recall means just that. It is for present time remembering
something that happened in the past. It is not
re-experiencing it, re-living it or re-running it.

Recall does not mean going back to when it happened. It
simply means that you are in present time, thinking of,
remembering, putting your attention on something that
happened in the past-all done from PRESENT TIME.

Returning is the word used to go back and re-experience an
incident.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:ei.rd 
copyright  1968 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

************** 

27. HCOB  10 DEC 64 SCIENTOLOGY 0 LISTEN STYLE AUDITING


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 10 DECEMBER 1964

Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students
Sthil Co-audit

SCIENTOLOGY 0

LISTEN STYLE AUDITING

There are two ways to run Listen Style Auditing-1. As a
number of teams directly under an auditing supervisor and
2. As an individual auditor. Correct training procedure at
Level 0 is to have the auditor do co-audit style until
confident and then train him to do the same thing individually.

LISTEN STYLE CO-AUDIT

The Co-audit version is merely to get the student to do
auditing without having to assume too much responsibility.

In this version it is really the instructor who is doing
the auditing. He starts the session and tells the auditor
to give the commands and acknowledge the answers. If this
relationship is understood it makes the supervision of a
Level 0 group of teams much easier.

The procedure for running a Listen Style Co-audit is as follows:

1. Instructor gets the auditors to seat their pcs in their
chairs and then sit down.

2. He writes up on a board the exact wording of the process
to be used.

3. He asks students if the room is alright for them to be
audited in.

4. He tells them what is going to be run in the session (R
Factor) and cleans up any questions on the part of pcs
(obviously, stress is on getting them able to talk to anyone).

5. He tells auditors and pcs that all the auditor is
permitted to do is to give the command and acknowledge the
answers. If pc says anything that cannot be handled with an
acknowledgement the auditor will put out his hand behind
him and wait for an instructor.

6. He tells the auditors to keep their auditor's reports.

7. Instructor then says &quot;Start of Session&quot;. And tells the
auditors to give the command.

No goals or rudiments are set or done.

Notes: Students should be taught that before they give an
acknowledgement they should understand pc's answer. They
are permitted therefore to ask pc to amplify an answer or
to explain a word so that they (the auditors) understand
the answer.

If a student puts out his hand the instructor goes to
session and without ending it handles what needs handling
and then lets session go on. The instructor is careful not
to become the pc's auditor completely as transference will
set in and pcs will invent trouble to get more attention.
Instructor should have a meter handy so that in the case of
an ARC Break he can quickly do an assessment. In doing the 
ARC Break Assessment he is of course careful not to audit 
the pc, only to locate and indicate the by-passed charge.

At end of period, Instructor says &quot;Commence ending your
sessions.&quot; He waits a bit and then says: &quot;Tell your auditor
any gains you've made in the session. Auditors write them
down.&quot; Waits again and then says &quot;Alright, I'm going to end
the session now. End of Session.&quot; Instructor then gives
whatever instruction is necessary either to end the period
or to get the room ready for the next period or gives a
break, etc.

LISTEN STYLE, INDIVIDUAL

This is done exactly the same as the Co-audit version but
in this case of course the auditor handles the session. It
goes like this:

1. The auditor seats the pc in his or her chair and then
sits down across from the pc, knees a few inches from the
pc's. A table is used, or just two chairs, the auditor's
report being kept on a clip board. There is, of course, no
meter.

2. The auditor takes the exact auditing command to be used
from his text book, bulletin or notes.

3. He asks the pc if it is all right to audit the pc in the
room and if not, makes things right by adjusting the room
or location of auditing.

4. He tells the pc the purpose of such sessions (Reality
Factor) &quot;I want to get you used to talking to another.&quot; &quot;I
want to improve your reach,&quot; etc. It's the auditor's goal
at this level, not the pc's. Pcs don't get a chance to have
goals in Listen Style as they would set goals they can't
attain at this level and wouldn't have enough reality on
auditing anyway to be sensible about it.

So, only an R Factor is used-no goals. The auditor also
tells the pc exactly how long the session will be.

5. The auditor tells the pc that all he is going to do is
to listen and try to understand the pc, and that all he
wants the pc to do is talk on the selected subject the
auditor will give him and that if he veers off, the auditor
will call it to his attention.

6. The auditor then quickly starts his auditor's report.

7. The auditor says &quot;Start of Session&quot;.

8. The auditor gives the command from his text, bulletin or
notes. The command must have something to do with telling
people things or communicating, and may also specify a
subject to talk about.

9. Further commands are given only when the pc loses track
of the subject and wants to know what it was (see Routines
for Level 0 for exact handling of commands).

10. When the pc says something and obviously expects a
response, the auditor signifies he has heard, using any
normal means.

11. When the pc says something the auditor doesn't grasp,
the auditor asks the pc to repeat it or amplify it so that
the auditor does hear it in the fullest sense of the word.
(See &quot;The Prompters&quot; below. Only 4 are allowed.)

12. When the pc stops talking, the auditor must adjudicate
whether the pc is simply no longer interested in the
subject, or has become unwilling to talk about some bit of
it. If the auditor believes the pc has stopped because of
embarrassment or some similar reason, the auditor has The
Prompters, the only things he is allowed to use.

Prompter (a) &quot;Have you found something you think would make
me think less of you?&quot; Prompter (b) &quot;Is there something you
thought of that you think I wouldn't understand? &quot;

Prompter (c) &quot;Have you said something you felt I didn't
understand. If so, tell me again.&quot;

Prompter (d) &quot;Have you found something you haven't
understood? If so, tell me about it.&quot;

(The student must know these prompters by heart.) He uses
as many as needed, in the sequence given, to start the pc
talking again.

The auditor must not start a new subject or process just
because the pc can't bring himself to go on talking. The
whole essence of Level 0 is to get the pc up to being
willing to talk about anything to anyone. Thus any coaxing
is also allowed. Threats are forbidden. (a) (b) (c) or (d)
usually handle. These are the commonest reasons people
cease talking. Mere forgetting is handled just by reminding
the pc of the subject.

13. New Processes (or new subjects in a Routine which are
in essence new processes) are started only when the pc has
brightened up and become quite able by reason of getting
comfortable about the last one. Realizing that the whole
target of Level 0 is to get people willing to talk about
anything to others, a regained ability on a subject governs
when to start a new process. If the auditor can answer to
himself this question in the affirmative, then he can go to
a new process, &quot;Is this pc able to talk freely to or about
(subject of last process)?&quot; If so, it's all right to select
a new question from the same routine or a new Routine (more
rarely) and ask it now. But it is never all right to
prevent a pc from talking by butting in with a new question.

One never asks amplifying questions at Level 0. Commentary
type questions are also out. The auditor listens to the
question's answers and only interrupts when he truly hasn't
heard or didn't grasp some point. No over and over
repetitive use of commands is made, of course, as that's
Level One. The Commands are given rarely, same commands,
but only to get the pc going again. Staccato repetitive
commands and brief pc answers are not for Level 0.

14. Toward the end of the auditing period, the auditor
warns, &quot;The session time is about over. We'll have to be
ending shortly.&quot;

15. When the pc has given an extra comment or two, the
auditor says, &quot;We're closing the session now. Time is up.
Have you made any gains in this session?&quot;

16. The pc's answers are quickly noted.

17. The auditor says, &quot;End of Session.&quot;

Note: Pcs of course often keep on talking and make it hard
to end a session. End it anyway. If this seems to shock the
pc, point out the time the session ended as originally set
and say also, &quot;You'll be getting more auditing and we'll
take that up in the next session.&quot; You'll always have
trouble ending a session if you fail to put in its time in
the R Factor (Reality Factor) in 4 above. As the auditor
notes the time in his report (see 4 above) he must say,
&quot;This session will go until________(hours and minutes)
precisely.&quot; Thus he has an out for ending it.

An auditor must never run beyond that time set, and must,
of course, audit until it is reached.

This, by the way, does not just hold good for Level 0. It
is very good practice for all levels in regular sessions.
The only exception is the assist where one is auditing
toward a definite gain.

In general auditing one seeks to obtain general gains not
sudden momentary spurts.

-----------------



The auditor, whether in co-audit or individual session at
this and the next level, will soon become impressed with
this fact: the more he himself says during the session, the
less gain the pc gets. Therefore, aside from the above, the
auditor does very little in the session and is paid
handsomely for it in pc gains.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH :jw.cden
Copyright  1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

28. HCOB   5 FEB 66 &quot;LETTING THE PC ITSA&quot;, THE PROPERLY TRAINED AUDITOR


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 5 FEBRUARY 1966
Issue II

Reissued 23 May 71 verbatim as
Basic Auditing Series 8

Remimeo
Auditors 
Supervisors
Tech &amp; Qual 

&quot;LETTING THE PC ITSA&quot;

THE PROPERLY TRAINED AUDITOR

The most painful thing I ever hope to see is an auditor
&quot;letting a pc Itsa&quot;.

I have seen auditors let a pc talk and talk and talk and
talk and run down and talk and run down and talk again
until one wondered where if anywhere that auditor had been
trained.

In the first place such an auditor could not know the
meaning of the word ITSA.

The word means &quot;It is a ........&quot;

Now how an auditor letting a pc talk believes he is getting
a pc to spot what IT is is quite beyond me.

This pc has been talking all his life. He isn't well.
Analysts had people talk for five years and they seldom got
well.

So how is it supposed to happen today that a pc, let talk
enough, will get well.

It won't.

The auditor does not know the very basics of auditing
skills. That's all. These are the TRs.

An auditor who can't do his TRs can't audit. Period.

Instead he says he is &quot;letting the pc Itsa&quot;.

If by this he means he is letting the pc drive all over the
road and in both ditches, then this isn't auditing.

In auditing an auditor guides. He gives the pc something to
answer. When the pc answers the pc has said &quot;IT IS A .. &quot;
and that's Itsa.

If the pc answers and the auditor acknowledges too soon the
pc tends to go into an anxiety-he has been chopped. So he
talks more than he wanted.

If the pc answers and the auditor does not acknowledge,
then the pc talks on and on, hoping for an acknowledgement
that doesn't come, &quot;runs dry&quot;, tries again, etc.

So premature or late-or-never acks result in the same
thing-the pc running on and on and on.

And they call it &quot;letting the pc Itsa&quot;. Bah! If a pc talks
too much in session he either is getting cut off too fast
by the auditor or hasn't got an auditor at all. It isn't
&quot;Itsa&quot;. It's lousy TRs. (The one single exception is the pc
who had years in analysis but even he begins to get better
with proper TRs used on him.)

The proper cure is to drill the auditor until the auditor realizes:

1. The auditor asks the questions.

2. The pc says what is the answer, &quot;It's a ........&quot;

3. The auditor acks when the pc has said it to the pc's
satisfaction and 4. The auditor acks when the pc has
finished saying &quot;It's a .......&quot;

And that's Itsa.

Scientology auditing is a precision skill, not a gag blop
goo slup guck blah.

1. The auditor wants to know ........

2. The pc says it is ........

1. 2. 1. 2. 1. 2. etc.

TECH SAVVY

Now an auditor who doesn't know his technology about the
mind and his processes of course never knows what to ask.
So he or she simply sits like a lump of sacking hoping the
pc will say something that makes the pc feel better.

A sure sign that an auditor doesn't know an engram from a
cow about processes is seeing a pc &quot;Itsa&quot; on and on and on.

In Scientology we do know what the mind is, what a being
is, what goes wrong in the mind and how to correct it.

We aren't psychoanalysts or psychiatrists or Harley Street
witch doctors. We do know.

The data about beings and life is there in Scientology to
be learned.

It isn't &quot;our idea&quot; of how things are, or &quot;our opinion of&quot; ....

Scientology is a precision subject. It has axioms. Like
geometry. Two equilateral triangles aren't similar because
Euclid said so. They're similar because they are. If you
don't believe it, look at them.

There isn't a single datum in Scientology that can't be
proven as precisely as teacups are teacups and not saucepans.

Now if we get a person fresh out of the study of &quot;the
mystical metaphysics of Cuffbah&quot; he's going to have
trouble. His pcs are going to &quot;Itsa&quot; their heads off and
never get well or better or anything. Because that person
doesn't know Scientology but thinks it's all imprecise opinion.

The news about Scientology is that it put the study of the
mind into the precise exact sciences. If one doesn't know
that, one's pcs &quot;Itsa&quot; by the hour for one doesn't know
what he is handling that he is calling &quot;a pc&quot;.

By my definition, an auditor is a real auditor when his or
her pcs DON'T overtalk or undertalk but answer the auditing
question and happily now and then originate.

So how to tell an auditor, how to determine if you have
trained one at last, is DO HIS PCS ANSWER UP OR DO THEY
TALK ON AND ON.

If I had an auditor in an HGC whose pcs yapped and yapped
and ran dry and yapped while the auditor just sat there
like a Chinese pilot frozen on the controls, I would do the
following to that &quot;auditor&quot;:

1. Remedy A, Book of Case Remedies.

2. Remedy B, Book of Case Remedies.

3. Disagreements with Scientology, technology and orgs and
Scientology personalities all found and traced to basic and
blown.

4. A grind study assignment of the Scientology Axioms until
the &quot;auditor&quot; could DO THEM IN CLAY.

5. A memorization of the Logics, Qs (Prelogics) and Axioms
of Dianetics and Scientology.

6. TRs 0 to 4 until they ran out of his or her ears.

7. Trs 5 to 9.

8. Op Pro by Dup until FLAT.

9. A hard long study of the Meter.

10. The ARC triangle and other scales.

11. The Processes of Level 0.

12. Some wins.

And I'd have an auditor. I'd have one that could make a
Grade Zero Release every time.

And it's lack of the above that causes an &quot;auditor&quot; to say
&quot;I let the pc Itsa&quot; with the pc talking on and on and on.

Scientology is the breakthrough that made the indefinite
subject of Philosophy into a precision tool.

And pcs get well and go Release when it is applied.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt jh
Copyright  1966, 1971
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

29. HCOB  11 DEC 64 SCIENTOLOGY 0 PROCESSES


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 11 DECEMBER 1964

Remimeo
Sthil Students
Sthil Co audit

SCIENTOLOGY 0

PROCESSES

The whole case gain to be expected from a pc at Level 0 is
an increase of ability to talk to others.

At Level 0 we do not expect or lead people to expect any
sudden miracle of physical or mental recovery. Rather, we
emphasize that we are getting their feet on the ladder and
as they progress up through levels they will achieve all
they ever hoped for and more.

Jumping to higher levels leaves the lower level
disabilities untouched and while trying to audit somebody
at, say, Level III, we will find ourselves struggling with
things that should have been handled at Level 0.

Further, this target is the one that beginning pcs make the
most gains on in my experience. I recall one near miracle
on a girl who couldn't bring herself to talk to her parents
and all I did was get her to tell me what she'd say to them
if she could talk to them.

Recalling is too steep for a starting pc. They can't recall
well really until about Level IV when they can be cleaned
up on their ARC Breaks with Life.

Here we have the whole design of Level 0:

&quot;Recover the pc's ability to talk to others freely.&quot;

If you realize that a pc can't be in session unless he is
willing to talk to his auditor, you will also realize that
he can't be in life until he is able to communicate freely
with others.

Thus any process that does not forward this end is not for
Level 0, no matter how frantic the case may be to become
clear yesterday.

The more hysterical a pc is about getting advanced
processes or a case gain, the less strenuous the process
administered must be. The psychiatrist erred on this one
point and it wiped him out as a social benefactor. The more
desperate the case, the more desperate were his measures.
He was just echoing his patients. It is very important for
an auditor to realize this one datum for it is the second
guiding rule of Level 0. It is a very senior datum. One
must not become desperate and use desperate measures just
because the pc is desperate or the family or society is
desperate about the pc. The worse off the pc, the lighter
the approach to that pc must be.

Psychotics (real, gibbering ones) are below auditing
treatment in sessions. The measure used for them should be
just rest and isolation from their former environments. And
the first process used should be just getting the person to
realize you are safe and safe to talk to.

So, although a few cases are psychotic, this still holds
good. The auditor must get the pc to realize he is
safe-won't punish, scold, reprimand or betray
confidences-and that the auditor will listen.

It doesn't give the auditor a withhold to not speak of
another's withholds. One can only withhold what one oneself
has done. What the pc did or said isn't even subject for a
session on the auditor for withholding it had no aberrative
value.

Even when we're Class IV, we still start all our pcs at the
pc's level, which is, for a beginning pc, Level 0.

So what we are trying to do with our pcs at Level 0 is the
following:

1. Recover the pc's ability to talk to others freely;

2. Teach the pc by example the auditor is safe to talk to
and won't scold, reprimand, punish or betray, and

3. Refuse to engage in desperate measures just because the
pc is desperate; and therefore get a real, lasting gain for
the pc.

ROUTINES

A routine is a standard process, designed for the best
steady gain of the pc at that level.

The remedy is different. It is an auditing process which is
designed to handle a non-routine situation. The only real
remedy at Level 0 is patching up having failed to hear or
understand the pc. The rest is all done by routine. The
Case Remedies are at Level II and while we all realize that
every Level 0 case needs a lot of Level II remedies, we
also know that no remedy will work well until the pc is
able to talk to others. When you run into trouble at Level
0, there are only 3 reasons possible:

1. The pc was not run in a direction or on a process to
improve his or her ability to communicate to others;

2. The auditor failed to understand the pc's statements,
either words or meanings; or 3. The auditor engaged in
desperate measures, changed processes, or scolded or did
something to lower the pc's feeling of security in the session.

That's all. As you go on up through the levels, you will
find many other ways a pc can get upset. But at Level 0,
the pc is not close enough to reality on his own case to
even be touched by these at first. The pc is a long way off
when he first starts getting audited. He can only approach
his own case by degrees. So a pc, no matter how wildly he
or she dramatizes at Level 0, is really only capable of a
reality of the smallest kind about self. And such a pc must
be able to talk before anything else can happen. Pcs can be
ruined by someone who doesn't grasp that simple fact.
Psychiatrists, failing to grasp it, murdered several
million people-so it's no light matter. It's an important one.

A pc at Level 0 usually can't even conceive of an overt (a
harmful act) done by himself.

When they can, they go religiously guilty and seek to atone
or some such thing. Become a monk. Or commit suicide.

The reason 33 1/3 percent of all psycho-analytic patients
are said to have committed suicide in their first three
months of treatment is not that they &quot;came too late&quot; but
that a lot of wild data was thrown at them to get at their
&quot;source of guilt&quot; and they went head on into the reactive
bank, sought to demonstrate their &quot;guilt&quot; by making others
guilty and killing themselves.

You don't want anything out of the pc but an increased
ability to talk relaxedly to others without fear,
embarrassment, suspicion or guilt. So all processes at
Level 0 are arranged accordingly.


WORDINGS

To give all possible wordings of routines that will
accomplish the above is completely beyond need.

Once you have the idea of it straight, you can invent them
by the dozens.

One doesn't even have to think of a particular pc. All
Level 0 processes are good only when they apply to all pcs.

ROUTINE 0-0 (Zero-Zero)

The starting routine is the most basic of all auditing
routines. It is simply &quot;What are you willing to talk to me
about?&quot; Pc answers. &quot;What would you like to tell me about
that?&quot; At Level II, the first question alone becomes a
remedy. Here the two questions make a routine-and a very
effective one it is!

ROUTINE 0-A

This is how the auditor puts together Routine 0-A:

1. Make a list of people or things one can't generally talk
to easily! That includes parents, policemen, govemments and
God. But it's a far longer list. The auditor must do this.
It must never be published as a &quot;canned&quot; list.

2. Using any one of the listed items: &quot;If you could talk
to____(listed item) what would you say?&quot;

All right, that's all there is to finding the commands for
Routine 0-A.

One doesn't get the pc to do the list. The list isn't done
in session. The auditor does it himself on his own time.
And each auditor must do his own list for his pcs and add
to it from time to time as he thinks of new ones.

The pc isn't necessarily given any choice of items. The
auditor picks one he thinks may fit. That's easy to do
after one session. The pc keeps complaining about parents.
OK. Run 0-A on parents.

And flatten it!

By flatten is meant to use that one subject until the pc is
darned sure he or she could now talk to the item chosen. If
the pc still wants to abuse the item, it isn't flat. If the
pc still wants to do something about the item, it is not
flat. When the pc is cheerful about the item or no longer
fascinated with it, it's flat.

Remember, there's no need to find out what the pc can't
talk to. In fact, most cases you're better off just to take
an item of your own for 0-A and use it. May seem strange,
but you'll have a smoother time of it with the pc. Further
you'll not restimulate (churn up) the pc's bank so hard.

ROUTINE 0-B

The second routine consists of things to talk about.

One puts the routine together this way:

1. The auditor makes a list (not from the pc but himself)
of everything he can think of that is banned for any reason
from conversation or is not generally considered acceptable
for social communication. This includes non-social subjects
like sexual experiences, W.C. details, embarrassing
experiences, thefts one has done, etc.

Things nobody would calmly discuss in mixed company.

2. An item from the list is included in the auditing
command, &quot;What would you be willing to tell me about ?&quot; Add
the item you choose.

3. When they have &quot;run down&quot; (as in clocks) ask them, &quot;Who
else could you say those things to?&quot;

4. Rechoose a subject on the list.

5. Repeat 3.

6. Continue to repeat 4. and 5.

Above all, don't be critical of the pc. And very calmly
hear and seek to understand what the pc said. (You never,
by the way, seek to find out why the pc reacted or
responded in some way. A real blunder at Level 0 is &quot;Why
did you feel that way?&quot; Or &quot;Why do you think you can't say
that?&quot; You're not after the causes of things at Level 0.
You will find out why at Level VI!) At Level 0, just keep
them talking while you listen. And you use only the subject
chosen to keep them talking.

ROUTINE 0-C

Routine 0-C is, of course, old R-1-C renamed. It is done
without a meter and it has any subject under the sun
included in its command. It is elsewhere covered.

In all the above routines it is vital not to alter the
commands given above.

-------------

There are many more possible routines. But to be a Level
Zero Routine it must have as its goal only freeing up the
ability of the pc to talk freely to others.

This is not a level to be regarded with a brush-off. It
takes a lot of skill to restore a pc's ability to
communicate freely.

When an auditor has that skill he will succeed at all
higher levels.

When a pc has that skill regained, his world will look to
him to be a far, far better place.

So it is very important to get over this first hurdle. And
very important not to dodge it and try to climb the hill
anyway. It will become an awfully steep hill.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH :jw.cden
Copyright  1964
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************


