   
   CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 1/16


CONTENTS:

Part 1

01. HCOPL  2 FEB 80 CLASS VIII COURSE CHECKSHEET
02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 r. 15 Jun 70 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 TECHNICAL DEGRADES
04. HCOB  20 OCT 68 THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII
05. HCOB  23 JAN 75 THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII
06. HCOB  31 JAN 75 TEACHING THE CLASS VIII
07. HCOB  22 JAN 77 IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE IT
08. HCOB   9 FEB 79 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH
09. HCOB  11 OCT 67 CLAY TABLE TRAINING
10. HCOB   3 APR 66 DIANETIC AUDITING COURSE


**************************************************

CLASS VIII CONFIDENTIAL COURSE PACK PART 1/16

**************************************************

01. HCOPL 2 FEB 80 CLASS VIII COURSE CHECKSHEET


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 FEBRUARY 1980

Limited
Distribution
OT III and above
ONLY!

Class VIII Sups (OT III)
Class VIII Students (OT III)

C O N F I D E N T I A L

THE CONFIDENTIAL - OT III
CLASS VIII COURSE CHECKSHEET

NOTE: This HCO Policy Letter restores the original form of
the Class VIII Course as developed in 1968, and now
includes recently issued and revised HCO Bulletins that
apply to this course.

NAME: _______ ORG: _______

POST: _______

DATE STARTED: _______  DATE COMPLETED: _______

PREREQUISITE: 

1. Method 1 Word Clearing.
2. The Student Hat.
3. HSS Class VI (Prov.).
4. Hubbard NED Course.
5. TRs Course.
6. OT III (and above) ONLY!

PURPOSE: TO TRAIN AN AUDITOR UP TO BE ABLE TO DELIVER 100% STANDARD
TECH AND TURN HIM INTO A ZEALOT IN PUSHING IN STANDARD TECH IN THE
FIELD.

STUDY TECH: Full application of all study tech is to be
used throughout this course. It is to be studied in
checksheet order with starrates on those items so marked.
It is not Fast Flow.

NOTE: On completion of the checksheet the student is given
an exam which must be passed 100%. Once the student has
done a &quot;Well Done&quot; session, he is given a lanyard to wear
around his neck.

LENGTH OF COURSE: 3 weeks full time.

CERTIFICATE: The Graduate of this course is awarded the
Provision Certificate of Class VIII (HUBBARD STANDARD
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST) Provisional.

R-FACTOR: The Class VIII LRH Tapes are heard one per day
over and over throughout the course.


PART A - KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING:

1. HCO PL 7 Feb 65 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
Reiss. 15.6.70 

2. HCO PL 17 Jun 70R TECHNICAL DEGRADES
Rev. 9.4.77

*3. HCOB 20 Oct 68 THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII

*4. HCOB 23 Jan 75 THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII

*5. HCOB 22 Oct 68R TEACHING THE CLASS VIII
Rev. 31.1.75 

*6. HCOB 22 Jan 77 IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE IT
Reiss. 7.12.78 

*7. HCOB 9 Feb 79 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH

8. DEMO: What you will do when you encounter any
verbal tech.

9.

10.

11.


PART B:

1. Students do Folder Error Summaries on each others
folders and order C/S actions on each other.

2. Supervisors then do Folder Error Summaries of the
same folders showing up what the student has missed.


PART C:

1. HCOB 11 Oct 67 CLAY TABLE TRAINING

2. BOOK: AXIOMS AND LOGICS by L. Ron Hubbard

3. CLAY DEMO: Each Scientology Axiom.

4.

5.

6.


PART D - DIANETICS:

*1. BOOK: DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH

*2. HCOB 3 Apr 66 DIANETIC AUDITING COURSE

*3. HCOB 15 May 63 THE TIME TRACK AND ENGRAM RUNNING BY
CHAINS BULLETIN (1)

*4. HCOB 8 Jun 63R HANDLING THE TIME TRACK BULLETIN (2)
Rev. 3.10.77 

*5. HCOB 26 Jun 78RA ROUTINE 3RA ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS
Re-Rev. 15.9.78 

6. CLAY DEMO: A chain of engrams.

7. HCOB 19 Jan 67 MANIFESTATIONS OF ENGRAMS AND SECONDARIES
FURTHER DEFINED

8. HCOB 20 Sep 66 MINUS SCALE RELEASES ARC STRAIGHTWIRE - DIANETIC

9. BTB 28 May 74RB FULL ASSIST CHECKLIST FOR INJURIES AND ILL-NESSES
Re-Rev. 21.9.78 

10. DRILL:

(a) Drill handling a pc who is ill and has an infection/temperature.

(b) Whose injury is not healing.

*11. HCOB 4 May 68 DIANETIC COURSES STUCK PICTURES

*12. HCOB 20 May 68 OVERT-MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE DIANETIC COURSES,
 - Corr.&amp; Reiss. 54.3.74    LEVEL TWO, SOLO AUDIT SECTIONS

13. HCOB 28 Aug 68 DRUGS

14. HCOB 29 Aug 68 DRUG DATA
Corr. &amp; Reiss. 10.6.75

15. HCOB 26 Aug 78R MORE ON DRUGS
Rev. 5.10.78

16. HCOB 28 Sep 68 DIANETICS

17. Study 5 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed Folders.

18.

19.

20.


ARC STRAIGHTWIRE AND LEVEL 0:

1. HCOB 30 Jun 62 ARC PROCESS

*2. HCOB 27 Sep 68 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE

3. HCOB 29 Sep 65 CYCLICAL AND NON-CYCLICAL PROCESS CONCLUSIONS

4. HCOB 14 Oct 68 &quot;The Definition of Recall. . . .&quot;

5. CLAY DEMO: The difference between recall and R3RA.

6. HCOB 10 Dec 64 LISTEN STYLE AUDITING

7. HCOB 5 Feb 66 II Basic Auditing Series 8, &quot;LETTING THE PC ITSA&quot;
   THE PROPERLY TRAINED AUDITOR

8. HCOB 11 Dec 64 SCIENTOLOGY 0 PROCESSES

9. DEMO: Demonstrate what happens when an auditor &quot;lets
the pc itsa&quot; and doesn't control the session.

10. HCOB 26 Dec 64 ROUTINE 0A EXPANDED

11. Study 5 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed folders.

12.

13.

14.


LEVEL I:

1. HCOB 2 Nov 61 THE PRIOR CONFUSION

2. HCOB 5 Apr 62 CCHs AUDITING ATTITUDE

3. HCOB 12 Apr 62 CCHs - PURPOSE

4. HCOB 1 Dec 65 CCHs

5. HCOB 30 Jul 62 A SMOOTH HGC - 25 HOUR INTENSIVE

*6. HCOB 9 Sep 63 REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS AND REPETITIVE PREP-CHECKING

*7. HCOB 7 Sep 78R MODERN REPETITIVE PREP CHECKING
-Rev. 21.10.78 

8. HCOB 31 Mar 60 THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM

9. HCOB 19 Nov 65 PROBLEMS PROCESSES

10. CLAY DEMO: Why you can't audit a pc over a present time problem.

11. Study 5 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed folders.

12.

13.

14.


LEVEL II:

1. HCOB 26 May 60 SECURITY CHECKS

2. HCOB 16 Nov 61 SEC CHECKING - GENERALITIES WON'T DO

3. HCOB 23 Nov 61 METER READING

4. HCOB 13 Dec 61 VARYING SEC CHECK QUESTIONS

5. DEMO: When you would vary the sec check questions.

6. HCOB 8 Feb 62 URGENT MISSED WITHHOLDS

7. HCOB 12 Feb 62 HOW TO CLEAR WITHHOLDS AND MISSED WITHHOLDS

8. HCOB 3 May 62R ARC BREAKS MISSED WITH HOLDS
Rev. 5.9.78 

9. HCOB 21 May 62 MISSED WITHHOLDS - ASKING ABOUT

10. HCOB 25 May 62 E-METER INSTANT READS

11. HCOB 2 Jul 62 REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS

12. HCOB 4 Jul 62 BULLETIN CHANGES

13. HCOB 21 Jul 62 URGENT - INSTANT READS

14. HCOB 10 Jul 64 OVERTS - ORDER OF EFFECTIVENESS IN PROCESSING

15. HCOB 12 Jul 64 MORE ON O/Ws

16. HCOB 8 Sep 64 OVERTS, WHAT LIES BEHIND THEM

17. CLAY DEMO: Do a demo of the cycle of an overt.

18. HCOB 4 Apr 65 ARC BREAKS AND M/W/Hs

19. HCOB 21 Feb 66 DEFINITION PROCESSES

20. HCOB 5 Aug 68 CHANGE OF COMMANDS - OVERT - MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE

21. CLAY DEMO: The overt motivator sequence.

22. HCOB 3 Sep 78 DEFINITION OF A ROCKSLAM

23. HCOB 10 Aug 76R R/Ss, WHAT THEY MEAN
Rev. 5.9.78

24. HCOB 17 Apr 77 RECURRING WITHHOLDS AND OVERTS

25. DRILL: Drill each method and handling of recurring
withholds and overts.

*26. HCOB 6 Sep 78 FOLLOWING UP ON DIRTY NEEDLES

*27. HCOB 30 Nov 78 CONFESSIONAL PROCEDURE

28. DOLL DRILL: Drill the full Confessional Procedure.


LEVEL III:

1. HCOB 11 Aug 63 ARC BREAK ASSESMENT

2. HCOB 19 Aug 63 HOW TO DO AN ARC BREAK ASSESSMENT

3. HCOB 7 Sep 64 PTPs, OVERTS AND ARC BREAKS

4. HCOB 29 Mar 65 ALL LEVELS ARC BREAKS

5. HCOB 4 Apr 65 ARC BREAKS AND M/W/Hs

*6. HCOB 19 Jan 66 DANGER CONIDTIONS TECHNICAL DATA FOR REVIEW AUDITORS

7. CLAY DEMO: Why finding and indicating the exact BPC
will blow the ARC break.

*8. HCOB 1 Aug 68 THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING

9. CLAY DEMO: Each of the Laws of L&amp;N.

10. DRILL: Learn each law verbatim.

*11. HCOB 23 Sep 68 VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING

*12. HCOB 15 Oct 73RB NULLING AND F/NING PREPARED LISTS

13. DRILL: The procedure for F/Ning a prepared list.

14. HCOB 13 Sep 67 REMEDY B

15. HCOB 9 Nov 67 REVISION OF REMEDY A, REMEDY B AND S&amp;Ds

16. HCOB 3 Jul 71R AUDITING BY LISTS

*17. HCOB 6 Aug 68 LEVEL III R3H

18. HCOB 6 Nov 64 STYLES OF AUDITING

19. DEMO: Demonstrate each style of auditing.

*20. HCOB 27 May 70R UNREADING QUESTIONS AND ITEMS
Rev. 3.12.78 

*21. HCOB 3 Dec 78 UNREADING FLOWS

22. CLAY DEMO: Why you don't run unreading items.

23. HCOB 22 Sep 65 NEW LEVELS OF RELEASE

24. HCOB 27 Sep 65 RELEASE GRADATION ADDITIONAL DATA

25. HCOB 30 Jun 65 RELEASE REHABILITATION
OF, FORMER RELEASES AND THETAN EXTERIORS

26. HCOB 21 Jul 65 RELEASE REHABILITATION

27. HCOB 2 Aug 65 RELEASE GOOFS

28. DRILL: Drill the full rehab procedure.

*29. HCOB 15 Nov 78 DATING AND LOCATING

30. DRILL: Drill the full procedure of dating and locating.

31. Study 5 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed folders.

32.

33.

34.


LEVEL IV:

1. HCOB 22 Jul 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT

*2. HCOB 5 Sep 78 ANATOMY OF A SERICE FAC

*3. HCOB 30 Nov 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILIES

*4. HCOB 6 Sep 78 ROUTINE THREE SC-A FULL SERVICE FACSIMILIE 
HANDLING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS

5. HCOB 6 Sep 78 II SERVICE FACSIMILIES AND ROCK SLAMS

6. DRILL: Drill the full procedure for running Service Facs.

7. HCOB 7 Jul 64 SCIO III AND IV JUSTIFICATIONS

8. HCOB 1 Jul 65 ETHICS CHITS

9. HCOB 8 Nov 65 SUPPRESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS

10. HCOB 27 Sep 66 THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY,
    THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST

*11. HCOB 31 Dec 78 II OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING

12. DEMO: Demo out the steps of handling a PTS per the above HCOB.

13. CLAY DEMO: Why it is important to educate a PTS as
the first step.

14. HCOB 24 Nov 65 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

15. HCOB 21 Jan 66 S&amp;D ERRORS

16. HCOB 5 Feb 66 S&amp;D WARNING

17. HCOB 28 Jan 66 SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

DATA - HOW A SUPPRESSIVE BECOMES ONE

18. HCOB 10 Jun 66 II S&amp;D THE MISSED ITEM

19. CLAY DEMO: How you know you have gotten the right item.

20. HCOB 13 Jan 68 S&amp;Ds

21. HCOB 19 Jan 68 S&amp;Ds - S&amp;Ds BY BUTTON

22. HCOB 19 Nov 78 L&amp;N LISTS - THE ITEM &quot;ME&quot;

23. DRILL: Drill doing S&amp;Ds by button.

24. Study 5 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed folders

25.

26.

27.


PART E - GENERAL:

*1. HCO PL 14 Oct 68R THE AUDITORS CODE
Rev. 1.1.76

2. CLAY DEMO: The Auditors Code (once).

3. DRILL: Each line of the Auditors Code until known
verbatim.

4. HCOB 26 Nov 63 A NEW TRIANGLE BASIC AUDITING, TECHNIQUE
CASE ANALYSIS

*5. HCOB 1 Oct 63 HOW TO GET TONE ARM ACTION

6. DEMO: Demonstrate how to get TAA on a pc.

7. HCOB 21 Jan 64 METER LEVEL WARNING HOW TO KILL A PC IN LEVEL 5

*8. HCOB 24 May 62 Q&amp;A

*9. HCOB 7 Apr 64 ALL LEVELS Q&amp;A

*10. HCOB 24 Aug 64 SESSION MUST NOTS

11. HCO PL 27 May 65 PROCESSING

12. HCO PL 1 Jul 65 II COM CYCLE ADDITIVES

13. DEMO: Demonstrate what happens when one adds to
the comm cycle.

14. HCOB 3 Aug 65 AUDITING GOOFS - BLOWDOWN INTERUPTION

*15. HCOB 21 Sep 65 OUT TECH

*16. HCOB 12 Feb 65 &quot;THE DANGEROUS AUDITOR&quot;

*17. HCOB 11 Feb 66 FREE NEEDLES AND HOW TO GET THEM ON A PC

*18. HCOB 26 Aug 68 REHAB AND CORRECTION

19. HCOB 11 Aug 78 II MODEL SESSION

20. HCOB 9 Aug 78 II CLEARING COMMANDS

21. CLAY DEMO: What would happen if you audited the pc
without thoroughly clearing the commands.

22. HCOB 24 Jul 64 TA COUNTERS, USE OF

23. HCOB 2 Jan 67 DATING - FORBIDDEN WORDS

24. HCOB 18 Apr 68 NEEDLE REACTIONS ABOVE GRADE IV

25. HCOB 14 Oct 68 &quot;YOU MUST NEVER .....&quot;

26. DEMO: What can happen if the pc sees his TA.

27. HCOB 5 Mar 65 II BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES
    APPLICATION OF TECH

28. BOOK: BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES by L. Ron Hubbard

29. ESSAY: How you can use this book to keep a pc getting
audited and getting wins.

30. HCOB 12 Dec 68 INVALIDATION AND THE GOOD AUDITOR

31. HCO PL 12 Oct 68 EXAMINATIONS

32. The Grade Chart.

33. Study 10 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed folders.

34.

35.

36.


PART F - CLASS VIII DATA:

*1. HCOB 23 Aug 68 WORKABILITY OF TECH

*2. HCOB 23 Aug 68 ARBITRARIES

*3. HCOB 28 Aug 68 OUT TECH

*4. CLAY DEMO: Standard.

5. HCOB 7 May 69 VI SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITORS REPORT, 
WORKSHEETS AND SUMMARY REPORT WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

*6. HCOB 4 Sep 68 &quot;Don't force a pc....&quot;

*7. HCOB 6 Sep 68 &quot;When you check....&quot;

*8. HCOB 10 Sep 68 &quot;STANDARD&quot; TECH DATA

*9. HCOB 10 Sep 68 GREEN FORM, S&amp;D, REMEDY B

*10. HCOB 10 Sep 68 FLUNKS

*11. HCOB 11 Sep 68 FALSE READS

*12. HCOB 15 Sep 68 (re Purpose List)

*13. HCOB 15 Sep 68 &quot;The first thing....&quot;

*14. HCOB 19 Sep 68R ( re Old Lists)

*15. HCOB 20 Sep 68 REVIEW, ORDERING PEOPLE TO

*16. HCOB 20 Sep 68 GLEE

17. DRILL: How you handle a person in glee.

*18. HCOB 22 Sep 68 &quot;Auditors must always....&quot;

*19. HCOB 25 Sep 68 (re Listing Question)

*20. HCOB 26 Sep 68 &quot;The study of the 'Well Done'
LRH C/Sed Folders...&quot;

*21. HCOB 11 Apr 77 LIST ERRORS CORRECTION OF

*22. HCOB 30 Sep 68 LISTS

*23. HCOB 20 Apr 72 II C/S Series 78, PRODUCT PURPOSE
AND WHY AND WC ERROR CORRECTION

24. DEMO: How you handle when word clearing has been
too heavy on a pc and won't clean.

*25. HCOB 23 Sep 68 DRUGS AND TRIPPERS

*26. HCOB 20 Sep 78 II LX LIST HANDLING

*27. HCOB 2 Aug 69R &quot;LX&quot; LISTS
Rev. 4.9.78

*28. HCOB 5 Nov 69R V LX-3 (ATTITUDES)
Rev. 4.9.78

*29. HCOB 3 Aug 69R LX-2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST
 -Rev. 22.8.78 

*30. HCOB 9 Aug 69R LX-1 (CONDITIONS)
Rev. 21.8.78

31. DOLL DRILL: Drill assessing and handling each LX List
to perfection.

*32. HCO PL 7 Apr 70RB GREEN FORM
Rev. 8.12 78

*33. HCOB 25 Nov 71 II RESISTIVE CASES FORMER THERAPY

*34. HCOB 5 Nov 68 HOW TO HANDLE THE RESISTIVE CASE

*35. HCOB 8 Dec 78 II GF-40 AND EXPANDED GF-40RD - USE OF

*36. HCOB 30 Jun 71RB EXPANDED GREEN FORM 40RD EXGF 40RD

37. DOLL DRILL: Drill assessing and handling a GF 40RD Expanded.

*38. HCOB 1 Oct 69-1 WHY THETANS MOCK UP

*39. HCOB 30 Jun 70RA C/S Series 13RA, VIII ACTIONS

*40. HCOB 1 Nov 68 II OVERT-MOTIVATOR DEFINITIONS

*41. HCOB 5 Dec 68 UNRESOLVING CASES

42. CLAY DEMO: How you handle an unresolving case.

43. Study 10 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed folders.

44.

45.

46.


PART G - CASE SUPERVISION:

*1. HCOB 31 Aug 68 &quot;It is a High Crime....&quot;

*2. HCOB 1 Sep 68 POINTS ON CASE SUPERVISION

3. ESSAY: Write an essay on why it's important that a C/S
writes his Case Supervisor instructions.

*4. HCOB 10 Sep 68 CASE SUPERVISOR ADMIN IN AUDITING

*5. HCOB 11 Sep 68 CASE SUPERVISOR DATA

6. DEMO: What you know about a pc who gets into trouble
or falls on his head after auditing.

*7. HCOB 17 Sep 68 GROSS CASE SUPERVISOR ERRORS

8. DEMO: Demo each of the 10 C/S errors.

*9. HCOB 17 Sep 68 ETHNICS

*10. HCOB 17 Sep 68 &quot;There are 6 zones of action....&quot;

11. CLAY DEMO: The 6 zones of actions in Class VIII.

*12. HCOB 8 Oct 68 CASE SUPERVISOR FOLDER HANDLING

13. HCOB 6 Oct 70 C/S Series 19, FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES

14. BTB 8 Nov 72RA II Auditor Admin Series 22RA
Rev. 4.6.75    FOLDER ERROR SUMMARIES

*15. HCOB 2 Nov 68 C/S CLASS VIII - THE BASIC PROCESSES

16. ESSAY: Write an essay re the section &quot;problems of the C/S&quot;
and what types of actions he can use to set up a case.

*17. HCOB 8 Sep 71R CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS
Rev. 20.5.75

18. Study 10 &quot;Well Done&quot; LRH C/Sed folders.

19.

20.

21.


PART H - TRs AND METERING:

Although the Class VIII student is required to have passed
a TRs Course as a prerequisite, his TRs are checked by the
Supervisor in the following section. Any failure to handle
any one of the TRs confidently and with ease would be
pink sheeted by the Supervisor.

*1. HCOB 16 Aug 71R II TRAINING DRILLS MODERNIZED
RE-Rev. 5.7.78 

2. HCOB 30 Mar 73 I STEP FOUR HANDLING ORIGINATIONS

*3. HCOB 26 Apr 71 I TRs AND COGNITIONS

*4 HCOB 22 Jul 78 ASSESSMENT TRs

5. BOOK: E-METER ESSENTIALS

6. ESSAY: On what the TA shows and what the needle
shows on the E-Meter.

7. HCO PL 21 Feb 79 E-METER ESSENTIALS ERRATA SHEET
Corr. &amp; Reiss. 26.4.79 Corr. &amp; Reiss. 6.5.79

8. HCOB 11 May 69R METER TRIM CHECK
Rev. 8.7.78

*9. HCOB 18 Mar 74R E-METER SENSITIVITY ERRORS
Rev. 22.2.79 

*10. HCOB 16 Nov 65R E-METER SENSITIVITY SETTING
Rev. 22.2.79 

11. HCOB 21 Sep 66 ARC BREAK NEEDLE

*12. HCOB 21 Jul 78 WHAT IS A FLOATING NEEDLE

*13. HCOB 20 Sep 78R AN INSTANT F/N IS A READ

14. HCOB 4 Dec 78 HOW TO READ THROUGH AN F/N

15. DRILL: How to read through an F/N.

16. HCOB 5 Aug 78 INSTANT READS

17. HCOB 21 Jan 77RA FALSE TA CHECKLIST
Rev. 7.6.78

18. DRILL: Drill the False TA Checklist.

19. HCOB 7 Feb 79R E-METER DRILL 5RA
Rev. 15.2.79

20.

21.

22.


TRs:

OT TR 0 TR 2 1 / 2

TR 0 TR 3

TR 0 BB TR 4

TR 1 Assessment

TR 2 TRs

E - METER DRILLS: (From the Book of E-Meter Drills)

1. EM 1   EM 15

   EM 2   EM 16

   EM 3   EM 17

   EM 4   EM 18

   EM 5RA EM 19

   EM 6   EM 20

   EM 7   EM 21

   EM 8   EM 22

   EM 9   EM 23

   EM 10  EM 24

   EM 11  EM 25

   EM 12  EM 26

   EM 13  EM 27

   EM 14

2. HCOB 4 Dec 77 CHECKLIST FOR SETTING UP SESSIONS AND AN E-METER

3. DRILL: Drill the procedure for setting up before sessions.

4.

5.

6.


OT III MATERIALS:

*1. Handwritten Materials &quot;DATA&quot; Circa. '68

*2. HCOB 5 Feb 70 II SECRET DEFINITIONS SECT III

3. DEMO: 

(a) A BT.

(b) A Cluster.

(c) A Thetan.

4. HCOB 4 May 68 CHARACTER OF BODY THETANS

5. Handwritten Materials INCIDENT 2, 28.10.68

6. Handwritten Materials INC 1, 28.10.68

*7. HCOB 2 Nov 78R DIANETICS DELETED FROM OT III MATERIALS
Rev. 10.12.78 

*8. HCOB 5 Feb 70 SECRET THE BASIC ON BTs

9. DEMO: To your twin:

(a) How does a Thetan become stuck to another thetan.

(b) How do you handle this phenomena.

*10. Handwritten Materials INSTRUCTIONS
Rev. 12.8.69

*11. Handwritten Materials NOTES ON RUNNING
Circa. '68

12. DRILL: Drill putting in the Buttons.

13. Handwritten Materials RUNNING INCIDENT 2
28.10.68

*14. HCOB 9 Jul 71 CONFIDENTIAL SECTION III RUNNING

15. DEMO: How you audit BTs.

16. HCOB 4 May 68 CONFIDENTIAL CROSS AUDITING

17. HCOB 2 Oct 68 OT III

18. DEMO: To your twin, what can cause a freewheel into
R6 and how do you handle it.

19. HCOB 4 May 68 II OVERRUN ON OT III

20. HCOB 26 Aug 69 II ADD OT III C/S

21. DEMO: (To your twin) What you do when &quot;Overrun
on OT III&quot; reads.

22. HCOB 12 Apr 70 RUNNING OT III

23. HCOB Oct 69 II OT III ERRORS

24. DEMO: To your twin: What can cause a BT to fail to
blow after run on Inc 1 and how you handle each.

25. HCOB 25 Oct 69R SECRET CLUSTER FORMATION CUMULATIVE
 -Rev. 20.9.78 

26. DRILL: The correct procedure for Date/Locating a
Cluster.

27. HCOB 26 Aug 69 SECRET OT III CASE SUPERVISION

28. HCOB 8 Jun 70 II SECRET

29. Handwritten Materials IMPORTANT NOTE SECT III, III COMPLETION

30. DEMO: The EP of OT III.

31. HCOB 20 Oct 70 CONFIDENTIAL EPs

32. HCOB 10 Dec 78 ADDITION TO OT III PACK

33. HCOB 4 Jul 79 HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs

34. DRILL: Drill the procedure for auditing OTs on
correcetion lists.

35. HCOB 22 Dec 79 FLYING RUDS AT OT III AND ABOVE

36. DRILL: Drill how you fly ruds on an OT (Series 2)

37. Erratum 20 Jan 80 ERRATUM TO HCOB 22.12.79

38. HCOB 11 Jan 80 II QUAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ON OTs (Series 3)

39.

40.

41.


LRH CLASS VIII TAPE LECTURES:

NOTE: These are the original Class VIII Tapes containing
references to OT III data. They are CONFIDENTIAL,
CLASS VIII COURSE ONLY. Each tape is starrated using
the transcript.

1. Lecture 1 24 Sep 68 WELCOME TO THE CLASS VIII COURSE AND 
AN INTRO-DUCTION TO STANDARD TECH

2. Lecture 2 25 Sep 68 WHAT STANDARD TECH DOES

3. Lecture 3 26 Sep 68 THE LAWS OF CASE SUPERVISION

4. Lecture 4 27 Sep 68 STANDARD TECH DEFINED

5. CLAY DEMO: (a) Standard. (b) Tech.

6. Lecture 5 28 Sep 68 THE STANDARD GREEN FORM AND RUDIMENTS

7. Lecture 6 29 Sep 68 MECHANICS OF TECHNIQUES AND SUBJECT MATTER

8. Lecture 7 30 Sep 68 CASE SUPERVISOR DO'S AND DON'TS

9. Lecture 8 1 Oct 68 CERTAINTY ON STANDARD TECH

10. Lecture 9 2 Oct 68 THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING

11. Lecture 10 3 Oct 68 ASSISTS

12. Lecture 11 7 Oct 68 ASSESSMENTS AND LISTING AND BASICS

13. Lecture 12 8 Oct 68 MORE ON BASICS

14. Lecture 13 9 Oct 68 ETHICS AND CASE SUPERVISION

15. Lecture 14 10 Oct 68 AUDITOR ATTITUDE AND THE BANK

16. Lecture 15 11 Oct 68 AUDITOR ADDITIVES, LISTS
AND CASE SUPERVISING

17. Lecture 16 12 Oct 68 STANDARD TECH

18. Lecture 17 13 Oct 68 THE BASICS AND SIMPLICITY
OF STANDARD TECH

19. Lecture 18 14 Oct 68 THE AUDITOR'S CODE AD18

20. Lecture 19 15 Oct 68 ANALYSIS OF EXAMINATION
ANSWERS AND DATA ON STANDARD TECH

21.

22.

23.



PART I - AUDITING:

Review auditing as designated by Supervisor. List pcs
auditied and number of session given each pc.

NAME SESSIONS NAME SESSIONS

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

This will be passed when student is doing a perfect job of
Standard Tech auditing.

signed: _____

Supervisor _____

After completion of the checksheet the student will take his exam.

COMPLETION:

I attest that I have fully completed the Class VIII Course
and know and cab fully apply the Class VIII materials and
can achieve 100% Standard Tech results on pcs.

STUDENT: _____ DATE: _____

CLASS VIII AUDITORS EXAM:

PASS ( ) ________________

FLUNK ( ) ______________

signed:

Examiner

The above-named student has attested to having (a) properly
enrolled on the course, (b) paid for the course, (c)
studied and understands all of the materials of the
checksheet, (d) done the drills called for on the
checksheet and (e) can produce the result required in the
materials of the course and based on Qual verification is
awarded the Provisional Certificate of CLASS VIII (HUBBARD
STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIALIST).

CERTS AND AWARDS: _____ DATE: _____


L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

As assisted by
Kathy Stewart
CS-4 and
Snr C/S Int

for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY

BDCS:LRH:DM:KS:kjm
Copyright  1980
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 r. 15 Jun 70 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 FEBRUARY 1965
REISSUED 15 JUNE 1970

Remimeo (Corrected per Flag Issue 28.1.73)
Sthil Students
Assn/Org Sec Hat
HCO Sec Hat
Case Sup Hat
Ds of P Hat
Ds of T Hat
Staff Member Hat
Franchise

(issued May 1965)

Note: Neglect of this Pol Ltr has caused great hardship on
staffs, has cost countless millions and made it necessary
in 1970 to engage in an all out International effort to
restore basic Scientology over the world. Within 5 years
after the issue of this PL with me off the lines, violation
had almost destroyed orgs. &quot;Quickie grades&quot; entered in and
denied gain to tens of thousands of cases. Therefore
actions which neglect or violate this Policy Letter are
HIGH CRIMES resulting in Comm Evs on ADMINISTRATORS and
EXECUTIVES. It is not &quot;entirely a tech matter&quot; as its
neglect destroys orgs and caused a 2 year slump. IT IS THE
BUSINESS OF EVERY STAFF MEMBER to enforce it.

ALL LEVELS

KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING

HCO Sec or Communicator Hat Check
on all personnel and new personnel
as taken on.

We have some time since passed the point of achieving
uniformly workable technology.

The only thing now is getting the technology applied.

If you can't get the technology applied then you can't
deliver what's promised. It's as simple as that. If you can
get the technology applied, you can deliver what's promised.

The only thing you can be upbraided for by students or pcs
is &quot;no results&quot;. Trouble spots occur only where there are
&quot;no results&quot;. Attacks from governments or monopolies occur
only where there are &quot;no results&quot; or &quot;bad results&quot;.

Therefore the road before Scientology is clear and its
ultimate success is assured if the technology is applied.

So it is the task of the Assn or Org Sec, the HCO Sec, the
Case Supervisor, the D of P, the D of T and all staff
members to get the correct technology applied.

Getting the correct technology applied consists of:

One: Having the correct technology.

Two: Knowing the technology.

Three: Knowing it is correct.

Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology.

Five: Applying the technology.

Six: Seeing that the technology is correctly applied.

Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology.

Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications.

Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology.

Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application.

One above has been done.

Two has been achieved by many.

Three is achieved by the individual applying the correct
technology in a proper manner and observing that it works
that way.

Four is being done daily successfully in most parts of the world.

Five is consistently accomplished daily.

Six is achieved by instructors and supervisors consistently.

Seven is done by a few but is a weak point.

Eight is not worked on hard enough.

Nine is impeded by the &quot;reasonable&quot; attitude of the not
quite bright.

Ten is seldom done with enough ferocity.

Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are the only places Scientology
can bog down in any area.

The reasons for this are not hard to find. (a) A weak
certainty that it works in Three above can lead to weakness
in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. (b) Further, the
not-too-bright have a bad point on the button
Self-Importance. (c) The lower the IQ, the more the
individual is shut off from the fruits of observation. (d)
The service facs of people make them defend themselves
against anything they confront good or bad and seek to make
it wrong. (e) The bank seeks to knock out the good and
perpetuate the bad.

Thus, we as Scientologists and as an organization must be
very alert to Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.

In all the years I have been engaged in research I have
kept my comm lines wide open for research data. I once had
the idea that a group could evolve truth. A third of
Century has thoroughly disabused me of that idea. Willing
as I was to accept suggestions and data, only a handful of
suggestions (less than twenty) had long run value and none
were major or basic; and when I did accept major or basic
suggestions and used them, we went astray and I repented
and eventually had to &quot;eat crow&quot;.

On the other hand there have been thousands and thousands
of suggestions and writings which, if accepted and acted
upon, would have resulted in the complete destruction of
all our work as well as the sanity of pcs. So I know what a
group of people will do and how insane they will go in
accepting unworkable &quot;technology&quot;. By actual record the
percentages are about twenty to 100,000 that a group of
human beings will dream up bad technology to destroy good
technology. As we could have gotten along without
suggestions, then, we had better steel ourselves to
continue to do so now that we have made it. This point
will, of course, be attacked as &quot;unpopular&quot; &quot;egotistical&quot;
and &quot;undemocratic&quot;. It very well may be. But it is also a
survival point And I don't see that popular measures, self-
abnegation and democracy have done anything for Man but
push him further into the mud. Currently, popularity
endorse degraded novels, self- abnegation has filled the
South East Asian jungles with stone idols and corpses, and
democracy has given us inflation and income tax.

Our technology has not been discovered by a group. True, if
the group had no supported me in many ways I could not have
discovered it either. But it remains that in its formative
stages it was not discovered by a group, then group
efforts, one can safely assume, will not add to it or
successfully alter it in the future. I can only say this
now that it is done.

There remains, of course, group tabulation or co-ordination
of what has been done, which will be valuable-only so long
as it does not seek to alter basic principles and
successful applications.

The contributions that were worth while in this period of
forming the technology were help in the form of friendship,
of defence, of organization, of dissemination, of
application, of advices on results and of finance. These
were great contributions and were, and are, appreciated.
Many thousands contributed in this way and made us what we
are. Discovery contribution was not however part of the
broad picture.

We will not speculate here on why this was so or how I came
to rise above the bank.

We are dealing only in facts and the above is a fact-the
group left to its own devices would not have evolved
Scientology but with wild dramatization of the bank called
&quot;new ideas&quot; would have wiped it out. Supporting this is the
fact that Man has never before evolved workable mental
technology and emphasizing it is the vicious technology he
did evolve-psychiatry, psychology, surgery, shock
treatment, whips, duress, punishment, etc, ad infinitum.

So realize that we have climbed out of the mud by whatever
good luck and good sense, and refuse to sink back into it
again. See that Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten above are
ruthlessly followed and we will never be stopped. Relax
them, get reasonable about it and we will perish.

So far, while keeping myself in complete communication with
all suggestions, I have not failed on Seven, Eight, Nine
and Ten in areas I could supervise closely. But it's not
good enough for just myself and a few others to work at this.

Whenever this control as per Seven, Eight. Nine and Ten has
been relaxed the whole organizational area has failed.
Witness Elizabeth, N.l., Wichita, the early organizations
and groups. They crashed only because I no longer did
Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. Then, when they were all messed
up you saw the obvious &quot;reasons&quot; for failure. But ahead of
that they ceased to deliver and that involved them in other
reasons.

The common denominator of a group is the reactive bank.
Thetans without banks have different responses. They only
have their banks in common. They agree then only on bank
principles. Person to person the bank is identical. So
constructive ideas are individual and seldom get broad
agreement in a human group. An individual must rise above
an avid craving for agreement from a humanoid group to get
anything decent done. The bank-agreement has been what has
made Earth a Hell-and if you were looking for Hell and
found Earth, it would certainly serve. War, famine, agony
and disease has been the lot of Man. Right now the great
governments of Earth have developed the means of frying
every Man, Woman and Child on the planet. That is Bank.
That is the result of Collective Thought Agreement. The
decent, pleasant things on this planet come from individual
actions and ideas that have somehow gotten by the Group
Idea. For that matter, look how we ourselves are attacked
by &quot;public opinion&quot; media.

Yet there is no more ethical group on this planet than ourselves.

Thus each one of us can rise above the domination of the
bank and then, as a group of freed beings, achieve freedom
and reason. It is only the aberrated group, the mob, that
is destructive.

When you don't do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten actively, you
are working for the Bank dominated mob. For it will surely,
surely (a) introduce incorrect technology and swear by it,

(b) apply technology as incorrectly as possible, (c) open
the door to any destructive idea, and (d) encourage
incorrect application.

It's the Bank that says the group is all and the individual
nothing. It's the Bank that says we must fail.

So just don't play that tune. Do Seven. Eight, Nine and Ten
and you will knock out of your road all the future thorns.

Here's an actual example in which a senior executive had to
interfere because of a pc spin: A Case Supervisor told
Instructor A to have Auditor B run Process X on Preclear C.

Auditor B afterwards told Instructor A that &quot;It didn't
work.&quot; Instructor A was weak on Three above and didn't
really believe in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. So Instructor
A told the Case Supervisor &quot;Process X didn't work on
Preclear C.&quot; Now this strikes directly at each of One to
Six above in Preclear C, Auditor B, Instructor A and the
Case Supervisor. It opens the door to the introduction of
&quot;new technology&quot; and to failure.

What happened here? Instructor A didn't jump down Auditor
B's throat, that's all that happened. This is what he
should have done: Grabbed the Auditor's report and looked
it over, When a higher executive on this case did so she
found what the Case Supervisor and the rest missed: that.
Process X increased Preclear C's TA to 25 TA divisions for
the session but that near session end Auditor B Qed and Aed
with a cognition and abandoned Process X while it still
gave high TA and went off running one of Auditor B's own
manufacture, which nearly spun Preclear C. Auditor B's IQ
on examination turned out to be about 75. Instructor A was
found to have huge ideas of how you must never invalidate
anyone, even a lunatic. The Case Supervisor was found to be
&quot;too busy with admin to have any time for actual cases&quot;.

All right, there's an all too typical example. The
Instructor should have done Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.
This would have begun this way. Auditor B: &quot;That process X
didn't work.&quot; Instructor A: &quot;What exactly did you do
wrong?&quot; Instant attack. &quot;Where's your auditor's report for
the session? Good. Look here, you were getting a lot of TA
when you stopped Process X. What did you do?&quot; Then the Pc
wouldn't have come close to a spin and all four of these
would have retained certainty.

In a year, I had four instances in one small group where
the correct process recommended was reported not to have
worked. But on review found that each one had (a) increased
the TA, (b) had been abandoned, and (c) had been falsely
reported as unworkable.

Also, despite this abuse, in each of these four cases the
recommended, correct process cracked the case. Yet they
were reported as not having worked!

Similar examples exist in instruction and these are all the
more deadly as every time instruction in correct technology
is flubbed, then the resulting error, uncorrected in the
auditor, is perpetuated on every pc that auditor audits
thereafter. So Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are even more
important in a course than in supervision of cases.

Here's an example: A rave recommendation is given a
graduating student &quot;because he gets more TA on pcs than any
other student on the course!&quot; Figures of 435 TA divisions a
session are reported. &quot;Of course his model session is poor
but it's just knack he has&quot; is also included in the
recommendation. A careful review is undertake because
nobody at levels O to IV is going to get that much TA on
pcs. It is found that this student was never taught to read
an E-Meter dial! And no instructor observed his handling of
a meter and it was not discovered that he &quot;overcompensated&quot;
nervously swinging the TA 2 or 3 divisions beyond where it
needed to go to place the needle at &quot;set&quot;. So everyone was
about to throw away standard processes and model session
because this one student &quot;got such remarkable TA&quot;. They
only read the reports and listened to the brags and never
looked at this student. The pcs in actual fact were making
slightly less than average gain, impeded by a rough model
session and misworded processes.

Thus, what was making the pcs win (actual Scientology) was
hidden under a lot of departures and errors.

I recall one student who was squirreling on an Academy
course and running a lot of off-beat whole track on other
students after course hours. The academy students were in a
state of electrification on all these new experiences and
weren't quickly brought under control and the student
himself never was given the works on Seven, Eight, Nine and
Ten so they stuck.

Subsequently, this student prevented another squirrel from
being straightened out and his wife died of cancer
resulting from physical abuse. A hard, tough instructor at
that moment could have salvaged two squirrels and saved the
life of a girl. But no, students had a right to do whatever
they pleased.

Squirreling (going off into weird practices or altering
Scientology) only comes about from non-comprehension.
Usually the non-comprehension is not of Scientology but
some earlier contact with an off-beat humanoid practice
which in its turn was not understood.

When people can't get results from what they think is
standard practice, they can be counted upon to squirrel to
some degree. The most trouble in the past two years came
from orgs where an executive in each could not assimilate
straight Scientology under instruction in Scientology they
were unable to define terms or demonstrate examples of
principles. And the orgs where they were got into plenty of
trouble. And worse, it could not be straightened out easily
because neither one of these people could or would
duplicate instructions. hence, a debacle resulted in two
places, directly traced to failures of instruction earlier.
So proper instruction is vital. The D of T and his
Instructors and all Scientology Instructors must be
merciless in getting Four, Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten into
effective action. That one student, dumb and impossible
though he may seem and of no use to anyone, may yet some
day be the cause of untold upset because nobody was
interested enough to make sure Scientology got home to him.

With what we know now, there is no student we enrol who
cannot be properly trained.

As an instructor, one should be very alert to slow progress
and should turn the sluggards inside out personally. No
system will do it, only you or me with our sleeve rolled up
can crack the back of bad studenting and we can only do it
on an individual student, never on a whole class only. He's
slow = something is awful wrong. Take fast action to
correct it. Don't wait until next week. By then he's got
other messes stuck to him. If you can't graduate them with
their good sense appealed to and wisdom shining graduate
them in such a state of shock they'll have nightmares if
they contemplate squirreling. Then experience will
gradually bring about Three in them and they'll know better
than to chase butterflies when they should be auditing.

When somebody enrols, consider he or she has joined up for
the duration of the universe- never permit an &quot;open-minded&quot;
approach. If they're going to quit let then quit fast. If
they enroled, they're aboard, and if they're aboard,
they're here on the same terms as the rest of us- win or
die in the attempt. Never let them be half-minded about
being Scientologists. The finest organizations in history
have been tough dedicated organizations. Not one
namby-pamby bunch of panty-waist dilettantes have ever made
anything. It's a tough universe. The social veneer makes it
seem mild. But only the tigers survive-and even they have a
hard time. We'll survive because we are tough and are
dedicated. When we do instruct somebody properly he becomes
more and more tiger. When we instruct half-mindedly and are
afraid to offend, scared to enforce, we don't make students
into good Scientologists and that let's everybody down.

When Mrs. Pattycake comes to us to be taught, turn that
wandering doubt in he eye into a fixed, dedicated glare and
she'll win and we'll all win. Humour her and we all die a
little. The proper instruction attitude is, &quot;You're here so
you're a Scientologist Now we're going to make you into an
expert auditor no matter what happens. We'd rather have you
dead that incapable.&quot; Fitting that into the economics of
the situation and lack of adequate time and you see the
cross we have to bear.

But we won't have to bear it forever. The bigger we get the
more economics and time we will have to do our job. And the
only things which can prevent us from getting that big fast
are areas in from One to Ten. Keep those in mind and we'll
be able to grow. Fast. And as we grow our shackles will be
less and less. Failing to keep One to Ten, will make us
grow less.

So the ogre which might eat us up is not the government or
the High Priests. It's our possible failure to retain and
practise our technology.

An Instructor or Supervisor or Executive must challenge
with ferocity instances of &quot;unworkability&quot;. They must
uncover what did happen, what was run and what was done or
not done.

If you have One and Two, you can only acquire Three for all
by making sure of all the rest.

We're not playing some minor game in Scientology. It isn't
cute or something to do for lack of something better.

The whole agonized future of this planet, every Man, Woman
and Child on it, and your own destiny for the next endless
trillions of years depends on what you do here and now with
and in Scientology.

This is a deadly serious activity. And if we miss getting
out of the trap now, we may never again have another chance.

Remember, this is a our first chance to do so in all the
endless trillions of years of the past. Don't muff it now
because it seems unpleasant or unsocial to do Seven, Eight,
Nine and Ten.

Do them and we'll win.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt.rd
Copyright  1965, 1970
by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 TECHNICAL DEGRADES


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970

Remimeo
Applies to all
SHs and Academies 
Franchises

URGENT AND IMPORTANT

TECHNICAL DEGRADES

(This PL and HCO PL Feb 7, 1965 must be made part of every
study pack as the first items and must be listed on
checksheets. )

Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any
degrading statement must be destroyed and issued without
qualifying statements.

Example: Level 0 to IV Checksheets SH carry &quot;A. Background
Material-This section is included as an historical
background, but has much interest and value to the student.
Most of the processes are no longer used, having been
replaced by more modern technology. The student is only
required to read this material and ensure he leaves no
misunderstood.&quot; This heading covers such vital things as
TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood.

These checksheets were not approved by myself, all the
material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use.

Such actions as this gave us &quot;Quickie Grades&quot;, ARC Broke
the field and downgraded the Academy and SH Courses.

A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or
dismissal and a full investigation of the background of any
person found guilty, will be activated in the case of
anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES.

1. Abbreviating an official Course in Dianetics and
Scientology so as to lose the full theory, processes and
effectiveness of the subjects.

2. Adding comments to checksheets or instructions labelling
any material &quot;background&quot; or &quot;not used now&quot; or &quot;old&quot; or any
similar action which will result in the student not
knowing, using, and applying the data in which he is being
trained.

3. Employing after 1 Sept 1970 any checksheet for any
course not authorized by myself and the SO Organizing
Bureau Flag.

4. Failing to strike from any checksheet remaining in use
meanwhile any such comments as &quot;historical&quot;, &quot;background&quot;,
&quot;not used&quot;, &quot;old&quot;, etc. or VERBALLY STATING IT TO STUDENTS.

5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a
time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation.

6. Running only one process for a grade between 0 to IV.

7. Failing to use all processes for a level.

8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as
&quot;I put in Grade zero in 3 minutes.&quot; Etc.

9. Shortening time of application of auditing for financial
or laborsaving considerations.

10. Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of
Dianetics and Scientology to use or impede its use or
shorten its materials or its application.

REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get
pcs processed in orgs was considered best handled by
reducing materials or deleting processes from grades. The
pressure exerted to speed up student completions and
auditing completions was mistakenly answered by just not
delivering.

The correct way to speed up a student's progress is by
using 2 way comm and applying the study materials to students.

The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make
each level fully before going on to the next and repairing
them when they do not.

The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network
in the late 60s is entirely answered by the actions taken
to shorten time in study and in processing by deleting
materials and actions.

Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and
Scientology is the answer to any recovery.

The product of an org is well taught students and
thoroughly audited pcs. When the product vanishes, so does
the org. The orgs must survive for the sake of this planet.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt.rd
Copyright  1970
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

04. HCOB  20 OCT 68 THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1968

Class VIII

THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII

In Class VIII Tech no longer is hopefully applied. Auditing
is no longer gauged only against result. There is no more
&quot;auditing is what you get away with&quot; at VIII.

A flawless, invariable administration of processes with
flawless TRs, using ONLY the basics, is Class VIII.

The purpose is to administer Tech without variables, using
only highly standardized processes and actions, using only
a flawless TR approach, all within the new Auditor's Code.

The impact of this action produces 100% results. It
produces fantastically fast results.

And it produces more result than has ever before been attained.

Using the Class VIII standard C/S approach there are no
bogged cases.

The first thing a student on Class VIII has to learn is
that there IS an exact right way to do auditing, an exact
right way to solve cases.

If he grasps this, can do this, can select the correct VIII
C/S and get it exactly applied, the result can be achieved.

It is too simple for many to grasp at once.

The ultimate comedy is a student who arrives at course
offering &quot;improvements&quot;. He is confessing that he's never
applied Scientology straight and has often failed on pcs.

The cycle of the decline of an auditor is: (a) he fails to
apply the missing bit of Standard Tech, (b) he then has an
&quot;unsolvable&quot; case before him, (c) he then dreams up some
unusual solution, (d) every so often his unusual solution
improves that one pc a bit, (e) he now tries to apply it to
all pcs, (f) he thereafter consistently fails.

A student also has a cycle of decline: (a) he recognizes
his basics, (b) someone invalidates his correct data, (c)
he ceases to see what the basics are, (d) he muddles along.

In Class VIII we bring the basics back in and reinforce
them until the auditor will do them and nothing else.

From this we get a &quot;magical&quot; high velocity case gain curve
upwards on all cases.

The beginning Class VIII auditor often has the idea that
the result of the session is what he will be gauged by.
This is NOT true. We know what the result of Standard Tech
will be when flawlessly administered. We are not &quot;waiting
to see&quot;. We are not experimenting. There are no different
or difficult pcs.

The student on VIII is gauged by the flawless handling of
the session and his admin. If the pc does not arrive at the
examiner in good shape then we know

(a) The auditor goofed

(b) The TRs stank

(c) The Auditor's Code was probably not followed

(d) The auditing report is probably false

(e) The C/S was probably botched up in being given

(f) The session control was bad.

You see we know what Standard Tech does. It's up to the
auditor to learn to be UNCOMPROMISINGLY STANDARD.

When we have brought about this frame of mind and standard
rendition in the auditor we have made a Class VIII. Until
we do, we have not.

The purpose of the course, then, is to produce an
uncompromising zealot for Standard Tech whose reality is
such that he will not do or tolerate sloppy rendition.

This can be defeated by lousy beginning auditing on the
course, by an incompetent Supervisor who invalidates the
students' basics or by a C/S who fails to use Standard Tech
C/S on a course.

To throw a Class VIII Course out of line and defeat its
purpose while supervising or C/Sing gives an automatic
Treason assignment.

People who really don't understand it are in a muddle of
confusion anyway. This blows off as basics go in. You just
keep putting basics in and they get unconfused.

There is something here in Standard Tech. It is the exact
Auditor's Code, the exact TRs, the exact processes, the
100% result. It can be learned, it can be done.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH :jp.ts
Copyright  1968
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

05. HCOB  23 JAN 75 THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII



HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 23 JANUARY 1975

Remimeo
Class VIIIs
Class VIII

THE PURPOSE OF CLASS VIII

The purpose of the Class VIII Course is to train an Auditor
up to be able to deliver 100% Standard Tech and turn him
into a zealot in pushing in Standard Tech in the field.

This has been the purpose of Class VIII since its inception.

Its materials are fully valid. The original checksheet has
been restored. It is a tough and demanding course. It is
not Fast Flow but 3 times through with starrates and exams.

THE ORIGINAL CLASS VIII COURSE HAS RETURNED.

Training of Auditors as Class VIIIs to forward Standard
Tech is absolutely vital today. It is not &quot;old&quot; or
&quot;background&quot;. Its materials cannot be found on any other
course. They are only available on the Class VIII Course.

A real Class VIII Auditor cannot be compared with a Class
IV or VI. A Class VIII is a flawless, flubless, smooth as
silk specialist in Standard Tech. He can handle any case
with ease. He is a dedicated advocate for Standard Tech. He
pushes in Standard Tech in his area and sets an example by
his own flawless performance.

STANDARD TECH

The way a Class VIII gets in Standard Tech is by
encouraging lower classed Auditors to use the materials of
Standard Tech and apply them.

A Class VIII must beware of invalidating lower classed
Auditors and make sure he doesn't fall into that trap.
Invalidation never works and is in fact destructive. Under
invalidation an Auditor will cease to audit well, will goof
and back off from auditing entirely.

To get in Standard Tech, always encourage lower level
Auditors to apply standard materials, tapes, HCO Bs and
books. Help them to do so. Direct them to the references.
See they get crammed, not invalidated. After all, they are
willing to help, or they wouldn't be Auditors.

SUMMARY

Class VIII is the standard by which other auditing is
judged. Class VIII gives the certainty and precision of
100% Standard Tech. Class VIIIs get in Standard Tech by
encouraging lower level Auditors to apply standard
materials, never by invalidation.

Every Auditor should one day make it to Class VIII. No org
can afford to be without at least one Class VIII. These are
the Custodians of Standard Tech.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH: RS:nt jh 
Copyright  1975 
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

06. HCOB  31 JAN 75 TEACHING THE CLASS VIII


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 22 OCTOBER 1968R

REVISED 31 JANUARY 1975

Remimeo
Class VIII

TEACHING THE CLASS VIII

As the teaching of basic data restimulates confusions which
are then dramatized by throwing the course off line, the
teaching of the Class VIII as follows is hugely vital.

The teaching of the SO VIIIs is laid down on these simple
principles.

1. The data on tapes and Bulletins is studied without
alter-is, interpretation or addition by the SO VIII student.

2. Well done and other folders are studied by the
individual student.

3. No lecturing or additional interpretation by Supervisors.

4. The student audits only when he has completely passed on
1. and 2. above. He is then given a rope and is permitted
to audit. He must not audit before he has completed his
checksheet at least once.

5. Things the student is weak on are done in clay.

6. The student is disciplined for bad auditing goofs. He
may also be taken off auditing and made to do his
checksheet again.

7. The student has to have well dones on sessions and 100%
on his final in order to pass.

8. Any student question is answered by referring to the HCO
B, folder or tape.

9. A rigid invariable schedule is precisely adhered to.

10. Checksheets and tapes and folders are gone through in
the sequence laid down by the checksheet and not randomly
out of sequence.

If this is made difficult then the programme must be cut
back to the bare bones of the original above.

The teaching of standard tech must also be standard.
Therefore the above MUST be adhered to completely.

LRH: rs.rd L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright 1968, 1975 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

07. HCOB  22 JAN 77 IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE IT


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JANUARY 1977

Remimeo
All Course Supervisors 
All D of Ps 
All C/Ses

IN-TECH, THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE IT


The dominating factor of tech being in, is whether the
auditor really wants to do a good job and help the pc. It
is a matter of professional competence and pride.

If the auditor does not have this there is no amount of
rules, reading or supervision that will bring about
technical successes.

Fortunately the vast majority of auditors have a high
professional conscience and are willing to study, drill and
do everything possible to perfect their tech. The Course
Supervisor, the D of P. the C/S and Qual Cramming terminals
must realize this and must do all possible to fortify it
and must abstain from invalidations and accusations and
injustices which tend to nullify it.

From this springboard of belief in the auditor and a
willingness on the part of those training and handling him,
to strengthen the auditor's determination to be
professionally competent, in-tech will only then blossom in
an org.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:nt
Copyright  1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

08. HCOB   9 FEB 79 HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 9 FEBRUARY 1979

Remimeo
(Also issued as HCO PL 9 Feb 79.
Issue II. same title.)

HOW TO DEFEAT VERBAL TECH

1. If it isn't written it isn't true.

2. If it's written, read it.

3. If you can't understand it, clarify it.

4. If you can't clarify it, clear the Mis-Us.

5. If the Mis-Us won't clear, query it.

6. Get it validated as a written order.

7. Force others to read it.

IF IT CAN'T BE RUN THROUGH AS ABOVE IT'S FALSE!

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:dg.kc.ch.cib
Copyright  1979
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

09. HCOB  11 OCT 67 CLAY TABLE TRAINING


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 11 OCTOBER 1967

Remimeo

CLAY TABLE TRAINING

PURPOSE: 

1. To make the materials being studied real to the
student by making him DEMONSTRATE them in clay.

2. To give a proper balance of mass and significance.

3. To teach the student to apply.

The student is given a word or auditing action or situation
to demonstrate. He then does this in clay, labeling each
part. The clay SHOWS the thing. It is not just a blob of
clay with a label on it. Use small strips of paper for
labels. The whole demonstration then has a label of what it is.

On the checkout, the student removes the overall label. The
student must be silent. The examiner must not ask any
questions.

The examiner just looks and figures out what it is. He then
tells the student who then shows the examiner the label. If
the examiner did not see what it was, it is a flunk.

Clay table must not be reduced to significance by the
student explaining or answering questions. Nor is it
reduced to significance by long-winded labels of individual
parts. The clay shows it, not the label.

The clay demonstrates it. The student must learn the
difference between mass and significance.

For example, the student has to demonstrate a pencil. He
makes a thin roll of clay which is surrounded by another
layer of clay-the thin roll sticking slightly out of one
end. On the other end goes a small cylinder of clay. The
roll is labeled &quot;lead&quot;. The outer layer is labeled &quot;wood&quot;.

The small cylinder is labeled &quot;rubber&quot;. Then a label is
made for the whole thing: &quot;pencil&quot;. On checkout, the
student removes &quot;pencil&quot; before the examiner can see it. If
the examiner can look at it and say, &quot;It's a pencil,&quot; the
student passes.

It might also be noted that checkouts on bulletins must
also ask for demonstrations. Use paper-clips, rubber bands,
etc. The examiner should ask questions that require an
ability to apply.

Give the student a situation and have him tell you how he
would handle it.

Questions about what is rule &quot;a&quot; do not detect the glib
student. Long-winded explanations on clay table put it back
into significance, prevent the student from learning to
apply, and prevent the student from getting the proper
balance of mass, and do not blow confusion.

All checkouts must keep in mind that the purpose is
application, not just getting a checksheet complete.

If clay table training is not brightening that student up,
then the above is NOT being done.

Someone is in such a rush that real learning is being put
aside for the sake of speed.

This student has to audit with his materials. Don't let him
fall flat by lousy checkouts and lousy demonstrations. A
well done clay demo, which actually does demonstrate, will
produce a marvellous change in that student. And he will
retain the data.

L. RON HUBBARD
1967 Founder

LRH jp.rd 
Copyright  
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************

10. HCOB   3 APR 66 DIANETIC AUDITING COURSE


HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 3 APRIL 1966

(The original issue of this HCO B contained a number of
typographical errors- Please replace your copy with this 
corrected issue.  The original copies should be returned 
to the HCO Area Sec.)

Remimeo
All Orgs (Tech Div)
Exec Secs
Tech Sec
All Tech Hats 
All Qual Hats 

DIANETIC AUDITING COURSE

The first requisite of any auditor trainee is to find and
run secondaries and engrams on a preclear, preferably a
fellow student, and to have secondaries and engrams run on
self.

Due to the fantastic speed of results today it is not
possible for a student to get enough auditing experience
using the standard tech of 0 to VI.

To remedy this we use dolls for model session practice and
learning the processes.

But even further training is needed, using live preclears.

The tech used is that of Book 1, Dianetics. The Modern
Science of Mental Health, but omitting the countdown and
canceller, this not being necessary today and using instead
a simple &quot;Start of Session&quot; and &quot;End of Session&quot; and then
running the engram.

Do not try to use past track incidents. The preclear may
eventually fall into these but try instead for current
lifetime.

Try first for secondaries (moments of misemotion)
particularly loss. Try to find these on a gradient, first
trying for minor losses and eventually locating the death
of a loved one.

Certain pcs (Black Vs they used to be called) are not able
to run track incidents but try to coax them through
incidents of loss on a gradient (small losses first) and
then get on with it.

They usually will get visio on incidents turned on if this is done.

There is a complete method of running engrams on anyone,
developed by me about three years ago whereby the date is
found then the duration of the incident. This always
permits an incident to be run with visio.

Don't try for sonic.

Get the pc to regress to the moment of the incident.

Don't try to run them conceptually with the pc in present time.

Emphasize getting the pc to start at the beginning and go
through to the end several times.

Don't be too keen on repeater technique to get phrases.
They show up if you get the pc to run through the incident
a few times.

When the pc can run secondaries successfully try for actual
engrams.

Once again try for light incidents like a pinprick and
graduate up to real engrams- moments of real pain and
unconsciousness.

Most students shy off actual secondaries and engrams and
try to run conceptual blah that could never have affected
anyone's life with the pc in PT. This alone is the cause
for failure of case gain running secondaries and engrams.

Don't try to pull withholds, etc, or handle present time
problems but send the pc who ARC Breaks with the auditor
(not with life) to Qual at once for an ARC Break assessment.

DON'T CONTINUE TO AUDIT AN ARC BROKEN PC who has ARC Broken with an

auditor.

All Ethics data applies-don't audit a Potential Trouble
Source. If you encounter an SP (no case gain no matter what
you do) send to Ethics. Lack of Ethics facilities and
Ethics know-how was the primary reason Dianetics
occasionally didn't work. So the new student has to be
genned in on:

1. If pc starts chopping auditor send to Qual at once.

2. Suppressives.

3. Potential Trouble Sources.

4. The org pattern showing Tech Div and Qual.

E-Meters must be used and regardless of whether the student
knows anything about them or not the pc &quot;must be on the
cans&quot;. We don't care if the student learns much or little
about meters at this stage but a bright student will catch
on fast. There is no E-Meter training at this stage.

The texts supplied the student are those which cover I to 4
above, Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health which
he must buy or own and an E-Meter he must buy or borrow but
may not be lent by the school.

There is real magic in running secondaries and engrams. I
have seen the most fantastic recoveries from running merely
a secondary (most spectacular recoveries with secondaries
were obtained from running the death of an ally). I have
seen severe physical ailments-heart disease, arthritis,
malfunction, allergies, impotency, frigidity, lameness,
etc, through the catalogue of human ills-vanish or reduce
on properly running engrams to erasure. We are not in
healing but we have a fantastic success with Dianetics in
this activity.

No auditor will ever be worth very much unless he has come
in the right way-through Dianetics. The concept of physical
and mental difficulty stemming from a mental image picture
was a great discovery and the technology of erasing such
pictures as developed must not be lost in our trained
Scientologists. This very instant I know of 3 cases with
whom I am in daily contact whose whole lives would be
changed by finding and running the incident necessary to
solve the case. I have seen a woman who looked 60 appear 20
after 9 hours of auditing out a single secondary (the
recent death of her husband).

When we originally tried to teach this technology (running
of secondaries and engrams, 1950-1952) we had no Ethics, we
were at that time already drowned with SPs. Auditors
weren't duplicating tech. They often couldn't even state
the basic definitions of &quot;secondary&quot; or &quot;engram&quot;. They
steered the pc all over the track or let him wander like a
lost soul. They tried to force the pc to run the auditor's
aberrations. And it was a jolly old mess ! But those few I
taught personally and simply had, as any old-timer will
tell you, the most fantastic successes with incredibly low
effort by the auditor.

It's just a picture, secondary or engram. The whole of the
technique is just finding the incident the pc is &quot;in&quot;,
running the pc through the incident, beginning to end,
several times and not letting him digress and letting him
come up the tone scale past boredom to enthusiasm by doing
so. When I think of the millions of words I have had to
speak or write just to get that terrible simplicity across,
I see it can be bent as technology in a thousand thousand ways.

The student has today guides he never had in 1950-52. He
has the Auditor's Code, the actual responses of the
E-Meter, Ethics and the final solution of how to turn on
visio even in SPs as per three years ago.

The startling gains of the exact tech of 0-VII of course
overawe the old plodder of 1950.

But there is a sting here as far as training goes. No
understanding of the mind is complete without a thorough
grasp of secondaries and engrams and running them. I have
seen a person trained up to a high level who suddenly
flopped at V because he had no faintest notion of what he
was auditing.

The budding psycho-analyst gets the shock of his life when
he sees there IS SOMETHING THERE. Before us, people thought
the brain had short circuits in it (psychologists and
psychiatrists) or that a beast called a Censor lived in a
dungeon in it (Freud), or that evil spirits haunted one
(Christianity).

The whole answer to the mind is mental pictures and masses
created by the thetan. There is no other source or cause of
aberration. Unless a student knows this he will never make
a good auditor and Scientologist. The only early way to get
a reality on it is to audit secondaries and engrams and be
audited through them. One does encounter all this phenomena
by the time one is a Grade VII even though not audited on
Dianetics. BUT students beginning their training are not
Grade VII. And unless they have actually audited or been
audited on secondaries and engrams they will never, even
though Grade VII, really have a reality on why people act
as they do or the complex nature of the bank.

Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health was written
before whole track was known. It made releases like mad but
they were then overrun like mad. It failed only on SPs and
PTSs. It was and is the answer to psycho-somatic ills and
human aberration.

My results with Dianetics were not often duplicated because:

1. I stopped when the ability of the pc on any one subject
was regained.

2. I audited smoothly.

3. I didn't use the subject to invalidate the pc (see
Original Thesis on why auditing works).

Many auditors did duplicate my results and made &quot;clears&quot;
which we now call releases due to total Clear being so much
higher.

That we are today making a TOTAL Clear as well as Operating
Thetans is completely out of comparison with what Dianetics
was trying to do.

Scientology is the route from human being to total freedom
and total beingness. Dianetics was the route from aberrated
or aberrated and ill human to capable human. This step had
never before been achieved in Man's history.

Oddly, the step from human being to a spirit had been
achieved, if rarely, but was not generally credited
(Buddhism, other spiritual practices, even Christianity).
Scientology really achieves it and for the first time with
TOTAL stability, no relapse and invariably one for one.

Nevertheless Man had an inkling of the goals of Scientology
even though he considered them almost beyond God.

But Man had no inkling whatever of Dianetics. None. This
was the bolt from the blue.

Man was hacking and sawing and shocking and injecting and
teaching and moralizing and counselling and hanging and
jailing men with enthusiasm without any idea at all of what
caused Man to behave as he did or what made him sick or well.

THE answer was and still is Dianetics.

As we can now go directly toward total freedom on a precise
and narrow roadway without any IFs and as it can be done by
a human being in about a year minimum time due to my
discarding of all non-essentials, by developing the exact
steps and techniques of administration, and as the result
is so hugely startling grade to grade compared to anything
anybody had ever even dreamed of and as the final result
was never before known in this universe, we tend to turn up
our noses at poor little old Dianetics.

But it was the grandpa, the ancestor, the basic discovery
which led to and the reason for Scientology.

AND we have the gigantic problem amongst us that
Scientology works too fast in an auditor's hands and
forbids him to overrun a result. Therefore HOW CAN HE EVER
LEARN TO AUDIT? He can't, running Scientology, as he'll
never get enough practice on live pcs.

Dianetics, however, has a virtue we never would have called
one in 1950. It is slow. You can grind away on a secondary
for hours. You can one by one whittle down a chain of
related engrams for days, even weeks. You can audit a pc
for a long, long time. And you can get auditing practice.

Now just one change-have the pc sit in a chair in Dianetic
sessions. No reason to use a couch. Thus the auditor has
the same set-up as in grade auditing. The same approach and
patter he will use in his standard Scientology grade
auditing MUST be used in this Dianetic auditing or the
practice will not train one to do Scientology auditing.
(Yes, I know the pcs will roll up in a ball or leap into
the air, but this is a hazard of the trade! Put such a pc
seated on the floor after one roll off from a chair.)

And one Supervisor caution: Tell such students to watch
that tone arm for reading at clear read and watch the
needle for a float and if they see the release phenomena
occur to gently ease off the session without even one more
command &quot;to go on&quot; or any other command. Unless you watch
this you will overrun some pc on a release grade. (Also
tell him what to do in case of a pc refusing to co-operate
or chopping the auditor-send to Qual quick.)

Dianetics is easy to do.

1. You say, &quot;Start of Session.&quot;

2. You locate an incident (an actual past happening).

3. You tell the pc to GO to the beginning of it.

4. When the pc says he's there the auditor tells the pc to
go through it to the end and say what is happening as he
goes along.

5. When the pc reaches the end of it, the auditor tells the
pc to go to the beginning of the same incident.

6. When the pc has, the auditor tells him to GO through it
(not &quot;again&quot;) and say what is happening.

7. Repeat 5 and 6. Repeat 5 and 6. Repeat 5 and 6.

8. When the pc is up to tone 4.0 (cheerful) on it, repeat 2.

9. On the new incident repeat 3 to 7.

10. When the new incident has come up to tone 4.0, repeat 2.

11. Repeat 3 to 7.

12. When the new incident has come up to tone 4.0, repeat 2.

13. At end of the body of the session tell the pc to spot
the environment a few times.

14. End the session by saying, &quot;End of Session.&quot;

That's Dianetic auditing.

Refined, one can handle &quot;bouncers&quot; or &quot;denyers&quot;, etc. But
frankly, I found the pc would only reach to these when he
was in over his head and the gradient of incident selected
had not been followed. If you choose incidents IN THE PC'S
CONSCIOUS RECALL not by flash answer or meter the
refinements aren't necessary. You just do 1 to 12.

The ORIGINAL version of Dianetic auditing was all done on a
gradient. One searched nothing out by meters or trick
questions or tests or flash answers. One got what the pc
could comfortably face and audited it. If the auditing was
smoothly done, the next incident was tougher but the pc was
comfortable in facing it. In that way the incidents
(secondaries or engrams) become progressively more
horrifying but the pc is quite comfortable facing each one
in turn. This is what is meant by &quot;gradient&quot;-it is a
steepening or an increasing from the slight to the heavy.
But you see the pc smoothly audited is gaining ability and
confidence all the time and so can face more and more
violence in his past. It's all there in pictures. Blackness
is either his unwillingness to face things or his basic
bank. It cures (vanishes) if you do it by gradients.

And the pc soon can see pictures very well.

Therefore IF your student is becoming a good auditor all
you need to do is look at his pc.

If the pc is more confident and cheerful, then the auditor
is learning and doing well. If the pc isn't, the auditor
has a rough spot and should go to cramming. If this doesn't
work, training being good, then the auditor is probably an
SP who has no idea of helping the pc at all but is using
&quot;auditing&quot; to bust somebody up.

Dianetics is too easy, really, for the student to conceive
that his minimum mild actions will produce such fabulous
results. So the auditor feels called upon to add. Additives
are what checked Dianetic results in the vast majority of
cases that were checked.

The pc who wants to &quot;psycho-analyze&quot; (talk) by the hour
isn't getting audited and isn't going to get any better.
This pc simply isn't under auditor control so the auditor's
control and TRs are at fault. (Pcs explain this sometimes
by saying they're &quot;cogniting&quot; whereas a cognition is rather
quick, not an hour's maundering.)

The pc has to be told what is expected of him. &quot;We're going
to find an incident in your life of which you have an exact
record. Then by sending you through it at the moment it
happened several times we're going to erase it. Just do
what I tell you and all will be well. Do you have any
questions about that?&quot; That exact quote must be made to the
pc who has not been Dianetically audited (which includes
many Scientology pcs too) and the pc must understand it and
be satisfied he does before locating and running incidents.

Very bad off pcs jump about on the &quot;time track&quot; and really
need only grade auditing.

Such pcs should be rejected for the purposes of this
Dianetic auditing and sent to any Hubbard Guidance Centre.



Some pcs just won't get the idea and just won't run
incidents. Simply reject for these purposes and send to the
HGC.

Some pcs are so snarly and choppy even before meeting the
auditor, they have to be sent to Qual and afterwards only
to the HGC as they're no good for this. They'll make it,
but are not easy enough to afford any training to a student.

Some pcs are simply Ethics cases (SPs and PTS) and these
too should be rejected for this purpose. The PTS is known
by &quot;roller coastering&quot; (Coney Island fast up and down
quarter-mile of aerial railway). They slump. So they're
Ethics cases.

If a pc ARC Breaks suddenly or seems very sad after
auditing it's an ARC Break with the auditor and needs Qual
attention-and the student auditor should be looked over
very carefully as a possible Ethics case.

------------

Engrams are hard to run in a room full of auditing teams.
So if possible one should assign the auditing to be done
after class hours in their lodgings.

------------

The way to fit this programme of Dianetic auditing into
training in general must be worked out and is left to the
Org Exec Sec WW who may from time to time issue, through
the Org Executive Secretary's Communicator for Tech, Sec
Eds covering its arrangements and materials to study (check
sheets). In the absence of such Sec Eds an Academy may make
up its own. It is possible to make it a whole new course
with an equivalent of the old Hubbard Dianetic Auditor
certificate. And one recalls that a course not even vaguely
as good as this one can be was the course on which all
others have been based since 1954. The course outlined
herein is a smoothed version of the course I personally
taught in 1950 to thousands.

------------

&quot;Secondary&quot; in its original use meant &quot;a moment of loss&quot;
and incidents should be chosen on that basis.

A secondary derives all its power from an underlying engram
(containing real pain and unconsciousness).

Therefore many, many secondaries (which bury engrams) must
be taken off the case first and the job thoroughly done
before engrams should be approached in auditing.
Secondaries may again be approached when engrams seem to
have been &quot;all cleaned up&quot;.

This alternation of:

1. Take off a lot of secondaries

2. Take off a lot of engrams-should be followed one after
the other.

Past life incidents are handled just like any other
secondaries and engrams. A &quot;past life&quot; and memory of it is
buried under the terrific loss of possessions and body and
natural recall can be restored by just general Dianetic
auditing as given in this HCO B. No special attention is
required.

Do not run prenatal or birth engrams unless they come up
naturally. The pc must run only consciously recalled
incidents. He need not recall the details consciously. Only
that the incident happened.



The state of release attained by Dianetic auditing is
probably below Grade 0 and should be regarded as such and
is declared by Qual as &quot;Dianetic Release&quot;-no grade number
being given.

THE MATERIAL IN THIS HCO B TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER ANY DIANETIC
MATERIAL, BOOKS OR TAPES INCLUDING DIANETICS THE MODERN SCIENCE OF
MENTAL HEALTH WHERE A CONFLICT MAY OR MAY SEEM TO EXIST.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:lb-r.jd.rd
Copyright  1966, 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

**************


