Subject: FZ Bible FIRST POSTULATE TAPES 25/35 (20th ACC)
Date: 25 Nov 1999 02:42:59 -0000
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

FIRST POSTULATE TAPES 25/35 (20th American Advanced Clinical Course)

**************************************************

Contents

20th ACC - First Postulate Cassettes [clearsound]

New #    Old #   Date     Title

20ACC-1  (1)   14 Jul 58 OPENING LECTURE
20ACC-2  (1A)  14 Jul 58 OPENING LECTURE - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-3  (2)   15 Jul 58 ACC PROCEDURE OUTLINED E-METER TRS
20ACC-4  (2A)  15 Jul 58 ACC PROC OUTLINED - E-METER TRS - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-5  (3)   16 Jul 58 COURSE PROCEDURE OUTLINED
20ACC-6  (3A)  16 Jul 58 COURSE PROCEDURE OUTLINED - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-7  (4)   17 Jul 58 BEGINNING AND ENDING SESSION
20ACC-8  (4A)  17 Jul 58 BEGINNING AND ENDING SESSION - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-9  (5)   18 Jul 58 ACC TRAINING PROCEDURE
20ACC-10 (5A)  18 Jul 58 ACC TRAINING PROCEDURE - Q & A PERIOD
20ACC-11 (6)   21 Jul 58 THE KEY WORDS (BUTTONS) OF SCIENTOLOGY CLEARING
20ACC-12 (6A)  21 Jul 58 THE KEY WORDS (BUTTONS) OF SCN - Q & A PERIOD
20ACC-13 (7)   22 Jul 58 THE ROCK
20ACC-14 (7A)  22 Jul 58 THE ROCK - Q & A PERIOD
20ACC-15 (8)   23 Jul 58 SPECIAL EFFECT CASES,  ANATOMY OF
20ACC-16 (8A)  23 Jul 58 SPECIAL EFFECT CASES, ANATOMY - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-17 (9)   24 Jul 58 ANATOMY OF NEEDLES - DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE
20ACC-18 (9A)  24 Jul 58 ANATOMY OF NEEDLES - DIAG. PROC - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-19 (10)  25 Jul 58 THE ROCK: PUTTING THE PC AT CAUSE
20ACC-20 (10A) 25 Jul 58 Q&A PERIOD - CLEARING THE COMMAND
20ACC-21 (11)  28 Jul 58 ACC COMMAND SHEET - GOALS OF AUDITING
20ACC-22 (12)  29 Jul 58 ACC COMMAND SHEET (cont.)
20ACC-23 (13)  30 Jul 58 ACC COMMAND SHEET (cont. 2)
20ACC-24 (14)  31 Jul 58 RUNNING THE CASE AND THE ROCK
20ACC-25 (15)   1 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING
20ACC-26 (15A)  1 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING (cont.)
20ACC-27 (16)   4 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING (cont. 2)
20ACC-28 (16A)  4 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-29 (17)   5 Aug 58 ARC
20ACC-30 (18)   6 Aug 58 THE ROCK - ITS ANATOMY
20ACC-31 (19)   7 Aug 58 THE MOST BASIC ROCK OF ALL
20ACC-32 (19A)  7 Aug 58 THE MOST BASIC ROCK OF ALL - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-33 (20)   8 Aug 58 AUDITOR INTEREST
20ACC-34 (20A)  8 Aug 58 REQUISITES AND FUNDAMENTALS OF A SESSION
20ACC-35 (21)  15 Aug 58 SUMMARY OF 20TH ACC

The clearsound set includes an Appendix containing two HCOBs.  This
has been included with the first lecture above.

Note that old 15B "Q & A PERIOD" of 2 Aug 58 was marked as missing in
the Flag Master List and was later found by Gold.  Its absense here
probably means that they found it to be the same as old 16A (20ACC-28
in the above list).

Old number 19B "Q & A Period" of 8 Aug in the Flag Master List
is also omitted but 20ACC-32 (old 19A) is extremely long and probably
contains both old 19A and 19B.

Note 20ACC-2 (1A) does not appear on the Flag Master List but
appears to be genuine.

We were able to check ten of these against the old reels and
found minor omissions [marked ">" in the transcripts.]

**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************

20ACC-25 (15)   1 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING

CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING

A lecture given on 1 August 1958

[Clearsound checked against the old reel.]

Thank you.

Speaking of responsibility, I want these classes started on
time. Four minutes in clearing a man can be a matter of
life and death, you know?

Well, here we come to the fifteenth lecture of the 20th
ACC, August the 1st, 1958. And today we take up that long
awaited subject. This is really the first lecture on -
although you had had a lot of preludes - that long awaited
subject: Case Analysis - Rock Hunting.

Now, because I haven't prepared any notes on this, probably
be a very difficult lecture to follow, particularly if
you're sitting in the middle of a Rock.

To begin with, the target of Dianetics was actually the
Rock. The Rock is no new discovery. Colloquially, we say
"Rock" because it is a relatively unrestimulative word and
it does have some dramatic descriptiveness about it.

I didn't really name it the Rock. I spoke of the thing
being like a rock and so forth and people started calling
it the Rock and it seemed to be very, very descriptive.

It's seldom that a rock is actually the Rock but understand
we've got as close to it as a lump of coal.

Now the target - the target of Dianetics was basic-basic.
And you must understand something about basic-basic before
you understand anything about the Rock.

The earliest incident containing pain and unconsciousness
on any given subject chain of aberration was called "basic"
on that chain. Let's see - a chain of the fellow is "burned
hands." All right, burned hands went back to a basic on the
chain of burned hands. And then to each occasion of hand
burning, he made a facsimile, or with each occasion of hand
burning, he actually made a facsimile himself and added it
to this chain of hand burns.

So we have a very long chain of burned hands. You have to
find the first time, theoretically, that his hand was
burned in order to blow off the entire chain. If you do not
find, as any Dianeticist can tell you, basic-basic on a
case, nothing moves very much. But if you don't find basic
on the burned hands, you then have difficulty with these
burned-hand engrams.

Now, an "engram" is a mental image picture of a moment of
pain and unconsciousness. And an engram contains pain,
unconsciousness and at least fifty-three perceptions. No
matter how badly this engram is scrambled, no matter how
dispersed it is (reference, perfect form), no matter how
chipped apart it is, or how cloudy or how black all these
fragments now appear, how much of a cloud it now looks
like, it nevertheless is a mental image picture containing
pain and unconsciousness and fifty-three (at least)
perceptions.

These fifty-three perceptions were a speculation in 1951 as
to exactly what they were. And as a matter of fact, we made
up some lists and they turned out to be at least
fifty-three. There's "kinetics" as one that you wouldn't
normally suspect as part of an engram.

Individual climbs off an airplane - if you want to see
kinetics at work as a perception, just have him look around
and find something he could do. It's not a terribly good
process and if you do it, for heaven's sakes flatten it,
because you're liable to leave him in the apathy of that
exact moment for a very long time. It doesn't just key out.

He's on an airplane, you tell him to look around and find
something he could do. And the next thing you know he gets
all the motion of the airplane. He can feel himself
bouncing and jumping and being thrown against the cabin and
thrown against the stewardess and so forth, and other
incidentals to this age of flight where airplanes are
supposed to be the thing.

He gets - he'll find himself picking all the military craft
that's crashed with the commercial transport, out of his
lap and other things, you know?

Now, he'll find also the gasp that he made and the actual
noise and physical jolt and the odor of the cabin and all
the perceptions of the color and so forth when the right
inboard engine went couagh-couagh-caff-cah-cah-cah-caca-
ca-ca-ca-ca on much vaunted ESSO gasoline. In other words,
he's made a movie, a 3-D mass movie of this thing.

But if you compare an engram chain to a movie of how to
burn a hand or how to ride airplanes you will fall far
short, because movies are not participatory. With what
comfort can you sit there and watch the villain shoot
innumerable heroes? You see, you can just sit there and
you're just a spectator. Well, this is the eventual lot of
somebody on an engram chain.

Early on it, he's a participant. It's 3-D, color, visio,
sound, 90 girls 90, see? And he's right in there being
sultan, getting his head chopped off, chopping off other
people's heads, you know? After a while he says, "I wonder
what I got this for?" So he chews it up, you know, and
these mental image pictures are not stored. He's actually
creating them instantaneously at any given instant. It's
what we know now, for sure - I mean we can prove it.

His ability to see one matches his ability to mock up, of
all things. So this cloud he's wearing around his head is
maybe a burned-hand chain. Why isn't it around his hand?
Oh, brother, he's no longer part of that chain.

And up along the line when you - way up, if you're running
something way up this burned-hand chain, he's just a
participant gone astray. There he sits way back watching it
all happen. Doesn't affect him. There's agony, misery,
degradation, overt acts, motivator sequences by the ton.
All of these things are part of this chain and he sees one
of these facsimiles and he says, "Isn't it a pretty
picture?" And it's called a "detached personality"
described by Sigmund Freud at the end of lecture
twenty-eight. He could not help them, not even vaguely. The
chain has become too painful even for a thetan. Do you see
that? He's no longer a participant, he's a spectator.

Beware of these pcs that are spectators. They're just
sitting way up the track, then they're looking at the bank
and it doesn't have anything to do with them. Nothing! They
get exteriorized pictures of their bodies and so forth. But
that, by the way, does not make a full-fledged spectator.
Almost anybody running the track will see his body some way
or another.

By the way, an interesting thing in the papers. The
phrenologists, a religious cult - they used to live in
monasteries and now they live in universities. These
phrenologists have remarked something quite amazing: that
every once in a while you walk into a complete duplicate of
yourself.

Fellow be walking down the street and he all of a sudden
walks into a person who looks like him, dressed like him,
is talking like him, is doing everything he's doing.
Amazing! And this phenomenon has long been remarked and was
even mentioned by Aristotle. Never occurred to them that we
could give them the answer, so they have never come around
so they are still in the dark.

Actually, the guy goes wham! out of his body, sees his body
in full color, 3-D and said, "It's another person like me,"
because the jerk is too stupid to realize he doesn't have a
body at the moment he's looking! You got the idea?

Audience: Yes.

All right, there's long articles in the paper about this.
This is a current phrenological craze, about this.

All right.

Here we go, you see, up the chain and a person is further
and further from it. Actually, he's doing an
exteriorization from an engram chain. Now, you should know
that an individual can exteriorize from his foot. If you
want a theta bop - somebody has hurt his foot, you just ask
him about that foot and you'll get a little theta bop. He's
exteriorized from the foot. He's yo-yoing a little bit, and
exteriorization is not stable, he's coming closer and
further, and closer and further, back and forth, back and
forth, a little bit, enough to make your E-Meter bop.
That's exteriorization from a foot.

Now, exteriorization from a whole body is something else,
but it again merely gives you the bop.

How about an exteriorization from a chain of engrams which
he is persistently, constantly mocking up? Ah yes, that
too, because it's really a part of his anatomy - of course,
it's mental anatomy - but nevertheless he can yo-yo and
exteriorize out of a chain which he is now mocking up as no
longer there and all chipped to pieces. But the chain,
because he copied it in the first place and then refused
all responsibility for it, is nevertheless there. There is
an isness about this engram chain.

And you understand what I am talking about with an engram
chain now? Basic: the first time he ever hurt his hand.
Succeeding engrams all contain hand injuries of one kind or
another, and the later he goes on the chain, the more
somatic shut-off, the more spectator, the more "it doesn't
concern me" and the more a frizzled cloud of nothingness he
sees when he inspects it. Do you see that?

Of course, he's just going all to pieces as far as his hand
is concerned, but here's this chain, and he just looks at
the chain, and he says, "Ah-bah."

Why do we call it a chain? Each engram is envisioned as a
link, locked into the last engram. To undo the chain it is
necessary to break that first facsimile. Hit that first
facsimile and get it out. That one will erase. The rest of
them will be dependent on the force of that first one.

Now, as we go up this chain we find some interesting
manifestations. It doesn't so much look like a chain as a
tree, and the basic, deepest root of the tree, or you might
say the seed of the tree, is "basic." But now, not only
just engrams add to it, but what we call secondaries which
are misemotional incidents. And these misemotional
incidents can contain gobs of apathy, grief, fear, anger,
antagonism, boredom, conservatism and even enthusiasm.

These secondaries are what spill out of a preclear's eyes
and droop and drip off of his shoulders with sudden
misemotional surges. It's all part of one of these chains
containing pain and unconsciousness. And that secondary
depends for its force utterly - we proved this time and time
again in Dianetics - depends for its force utterly upon the
physical pain and unconsciousness in the actual engram
chain; and that's a secondary. It means a misemotional
experience which depends for its force upon the basically
painful experience.

In the absence of physical pain there is no misemotion.

All right.

What else is there in this chain? There's also something
called locks. These locks are analytically observed and
inspected pictures. They are little incidents which contain
the associative restimulators to the restimulators in that.
Now, this individual has a whole chain of locks and they
have to do with hands. Only it's gone so awry that it's
possibly the beautiful hands of women, you see, and he's
got a whole lot of locks of beautiful hands. What makes
that set of locks stay there? The secondaries and the engrams.

Now, you start to run old ARC Straightwire on somebody, you
go through locks. But if you run long enough you'll find
yourself into secondaries - inexplicably, sometimes - pain
first, but usually secondaries. And you'll find this
individual all of a sudden saying, "Oh, boo-hoo-hoo."
"Yeah, what are you crying about?" "Well, the hands are so
beautiful." "Oh, yeah?" "They're so painful!" And you run
him a little bit further and you'd find yourself plowing in
through actual pain and unconsciousness.

Now, if you could get the basic on that chain, get the
basic on that chain, you could erase the whole condemned
chain. That was the theory - it's fact - it's factually true.

But there are so many complexities to a livingness or a
single life that to isolate these chains and then find the
basics on those chains was actually in our times way back
when, when we were struggling along the line trying to beat
this one out, particularly in the absence of E-Meters,
beyond the capabilities of the individual auditor. All he
could do really was to either key them out, erase the worse
ones, or as I did first to clear people, get people
confident of being able to confront a picture and its
perceptions. Just work on a confidence attitude until he
could at last face the worst one without flinching. And
then we could get basic-basic. That's how I found this
mechanism and that's how basic-basic came into view.

Now, what is this thing called basic-basic? It is the basic
of all chains. You know, there might be basic on hands.
There might be a basic on heads. There might be a basic on
tanks. There might be a basic on soldiers. There might be a
basic on civilization at large, the time he was ostracized
and so forth, each one of these things.

But below all these things there was some experience that
softened him up and made him believe that he could be hurt.
And that contained physical pain and unconsciousness and a
certain type of experience. It contained all perceptions,
and incidentally, because in those days he was far better
at mocking something up than he became later.

Look at the interesting thing you have. You have an able
thetan making a copy of an experience which was too
excruciating even for him to confront. Wow! And every time
he copies this thing again, or sees the copy again, he now
feels that all he can do is chip it up, so therefore when
he mocks it up he really chips it up. He breaks it up
somehow or another and he's mocking it up in a broken-up
form. He can't any longer mock it up, but part of its tag
and part of the thing he believes necessary is to mock it
up exactly as it was. But he had terrific ability to mock
this thing up. This thing is a killer! And that's basic-basic.

Any one of you were to view at this instant, while in a
body, a facsimile made while you were a thetan and felt
very, very able and very strong and beefy, man, you'd just
faint! You couldn't take it.

Do you understand? It's just - it would be wham! you know.
It'd be big, tough, rough, got that? Basic-basic, however,
erases if it can be reached.

Now, basic-basic has probably its own chain, but has on top
of it the basics and all the chains of the basics of all
engrams. And you will see this very complicated tree, then,
growing from a single germ and it is the reactive mind of
the person.

Now, there's one more thing in this reactive mind and that
is machinery. Out of all this pain and duress and out of
thetan ability and out of other things, he actually could
mock up, and then remove himself from the responsibility of
having mocked up, machines that did things. They did all
kinds of things, as we will go into in a moment.

He assigned the making of pictures to these machines, then
all he mocked up was the machine. And then he lost the
responsibility for mocking up the machine and he might mock
up machines that make machines. You understand that?

So the apparatus which shuffles these pictures is also
mocked up by the thetan, and he mocks it up as apparatus.
And when we say machinery, we mean machinery. It is not a
cliche that - not a coined word, it is not a label of one
kind or another that we've just dreamed up.

Every once in a while some little girl, who detests
machinery, will go through an HCA class or an HPA class and
they will come out saying, "I've just seen a machine!" you
know? "Thaaa! What am I doing?" you know. "I'm Dolly in
this life, you know, and I'm not supposed to make
machinery. What am I doing with this horrible monstrous
thing out there that shuffles out pictures every time I
want pictures?" It was a machine.

Now, the machines can also break up and sometimes you have
an individual, then, who has not only got the whole bank
busted up and is in some kind of a foggy dew around him;
he's mocking it up broken up because that's the safe way to
do. Why he keeps on mocking it up, you and I are solving.

But not only - not only does he keep it mocked up but he
keeps it mocked up brokenly. Not only can he mock up clean
machinery, but also he continues to mock up broken
machinery. Now, these things you have to know. He sometimes
will mock up machines that break machines. And he sometimes
will mock up machines that break up pictures.

All of this is composed of the perceptions: mass, energy,
space and time. The perceptions are part, really, of mass,
energy, space and time, waves of sound and light and shift
and motion and that sort of thing.

Now, the entire composite of this busted-up mess we know as
the reactive mind; it acts without the consent of the
person. He does not even have to look to act. What a nice
thing to have.

Truck runs down the street, you know what to do, you climb
a lamppost, but then you've got a suppressor that keeps you
from acting badly in public, so you don't climb a lamppost.
So the reactive mind tells you to climb a lamppost-not to
climb a lamppost. The thetan stands back and says, "I
wonder what makes me nervous?"

Now, that he is doing it all himself is not a condemnation.
And I get so sick of people saying, "Well, he's sick, but
it's all in his head." Oh, no, come off of it. This is the
most squirrel, tail chasing thing you ever saw. No, if the
guy is sick in his head, he's sick. You get the idea, I
mean? You don't say, "Look, you stupid jerk, it's just your
imagination." You can drive him into apathy that way.

People do it with children all the time. They say-little
boy keeps waking up and finds the room on fire, you know;
he keeps waking up and finds the room on fire and then when
he's been awake for-really awake finally, but when he's
sort of come up through it, he sees it as his-his own bedroom.

Well, now the bug in all this and the thing that made it
really impossible is the modern horror of dead bodies,
which keeps an individual from realizing or remembering
what he has been. Every case you see really out in the
street, except one Apache I ran into one time, is a total
amnesia case. This Apache could remember fighting US
Calvary with Geronimo and he didn't think this was peculiar
at all. He didn't think it was peculiar.

Apache has a different idea of time than we do, a different
definition. He hadn't been told that dead bodies were bad.
Leave it to an Apache to love them.

The lives of every person you run into go back, according
to the E-Meter, about 76 trillion years. Everybody you run
into. This girl that says, "I know nothing about
machinery." You try to point out to her, "Now, the way you
start your sewing machine, you see, is to put in the plug."
"Oh, I don't know anything about machinery." Daaa!

If you wanted to challenge her and put her on an E-Meter,
you could prove to her she was wrong in making that
statement. But she has every reason in the world to make
that statement. It's true that she (quote) "doesn't know
anything about machinery" if knowingness is merely an
analytical availability of information.

That the information is there is no reason to chop her up.
If she can't get to it, let me assure you of something, she
cannot get to it. And as far as the mind and imagination is
concerned, that which hurts, hurts!

And some fellow who is busy rotting off the lower half of
his body and can't find out why and is told by some
medico... I have a perfect license these days, by the way,
to criticize medicine; I invented most of the techniques
they're running on.

Yeah, there's a book published in about 1870 something, on
the glandular system, I wrote. Some of the wildest ideas in
there you ever read. Fuel consumption, fuel conversion,
thermal regulation, all this sort of thing, assigned
principles of glands. And they're still wondering what it's
all about.

Now, the medico comes along and tries to alter things
structurally. Structure does not monitor function. Function
monitors structure.

And if this individual conceives that he should climb
lampposts every time he sees an auto or any kind of a car
or truck or anything like that, and yet reactively must not
climb a lamppost - every time he sees a woman, he knows what
to do, you run.

What happens reactively? Well, you wind up in a torture
chamber and are killed, of course, rather lingeringly. He
knows this. He knows better than to accost a woman. He said
hello to a lord's lady one time and five years later he was
still alive and they were letting him have it.

But at the same time analytically he mustn't run away from
woman because you get punished. Duhhhh. His final answer to
the situation of must do-can't do, must reach-can't reach,
must withdraw-can't withdraw, his final answer is to just
get rid of his legs! And how he cooperates with the medical
doctor who wants to saw them off!

I used to wonder sometime in camp after battles, during
moments of high strain and duress in army life and that
sort of thing, when some soldier who wasn't badly injured
would beg you to saw his arm off or beg you to saw his legs
off. You'd say, "But, son, you're not hurt. It's just a
scratch; there's a bone splintered there a little bit.
We'll patch you up and you'll be as ..." "Oh, no, I'm
afraid it'll infect and do this and that and so on. Please,
saw it off."

Now, this isn't according to the historical novels you
read, but they're not a good authority. There are people up
here in Bethursday Naval Hospital - that's the proper
pronunciation of the word -

> That's the way the colored folks pronounce it,

that was the way they used to pronounce it, "Bethursday,"
so it must be "Bethursday" Naval Hospital - there are
people right up there lying in bed waiting to get their
kidneys sawed out even though they'll only live for a few
months if they do. Lying there waiting for their spleens
to be removed.

There are patients who are furiously angry with doctors
because they will not operate and remove large sections of
intestine or something of the sort. So - "Man doesn't know
his business!"

Just as it is almost a criminal misdemeanor in the eyes of
a psychiatrist not to give a patient an electric shock - do
you know it's against the law for a psychiatrist to refuse
an electric shock when one is demanded - so it is with limbs.
It's the patient who is demanding it!

I can tell you from a large, long track of experience that
you generally do what they want you to do in the final
analysis. Tomorrow's medicine is what the public wants today.

These people are trying to solve something and they don't
know what they're trying to solve. They haven't a clue what
they're trying to solve, but they're trying to solve
something, and there are various ways of solving it,
various ways of solution. One is to have no kidneys.
Another is to have no head, you know? But it usually adds
up to no something. You got the idea? We're trying to make
nothing out of something; it's a common denominator of most
of these things.

They're so confused they've completely lost track of what
they are doing and why are they doing it.

The decay and chip-apart of an engram which brings about
the final manifestation of field; you tell this person to
close his eyes and what is he looking at, and he says a
black swirling mass or a black still mass and so forth, you
are just looking at the residue from a chipped-up picture,
that's all. It has no other significance than that.

And he is trying to get at something that is doing
something to something. And when you as a Scientologist add
up the number of factors that can appear in a case you see
what this individual is up against, because there's another
one on top of it. Everybody always expected him to be
bright. Nobody - very few people ever admired him for being
dumb, so he never got dumbness as-ised, and he's just
getting stupider and stupider and stupider about the whole
thing, and it's more complex and it goes this way and it
goes that way, and the little levers go the other way, and
the thing chips up and goes some other way.

And he'll come up with some horribly upset solution that is
nevertheless better than no solution at all. And his stable
datum will get to be such a thing as, "Everybody's a crook.
Now I understand people. Everybody is a crook. Now I
understand traps. Everything is a trap. Now I understand
farmers. Everybody is really a farmer." Get the idea? "Now
I understand military services. All soldiers are rapists.
Now I understand men. They're all alike." Now that isn't a
solution. "Now I understand. They aren't." And he will hold
onto this kind of a solution.

And you as an auditor get in there and say, "What the hell
is going on?" "Yes, whatever, they aren't." "Yeah, but
whatever what?" "Oh, I don't know." "Yeah, but which way
are you trying to go?" "Nowhere. Ha! Ha! If I just sit here
quietly and keep my mouth shut, do not reach, do not permit
myself to be reached, don't try to withdraw, I've got it
made. I hope."

You get all sorts of things. "Always use a side entrance
because you could make such a grand exit up the front
staircase because of the footman, because everybody are
footman, please call the butler." Chain of reactive
computations all smothered with the parts connecting
missing every time the individual goes to call on anybody.
And it's so burdensome, all of this thing happening every
time he goes to call on somebody, he stops calling on
people, see? So the final solution is "don't." The final
solution is "not." Do you get the idea?

But with all this "not" and "don't," you've still got fully
alive and ready to be activated any and every part of this
reactive mind. You got that?

Now, please look at what you're working with and in the
light of that, understand what I'm now going to tell you
about Rock hunting. If I don't end this lecture on time, if
I go into the second hour, it'll be worth it, I think.

Let's look at this subject called Rock hunting. Rock one on
a case is desirable, it is basic-basic. All you have to
do - to locate the misidentifications which are basic-basic
on this case. That's all you have to do, because it isn't
adding to anything. It is. All things add to it.

Now look, I've talked to you enough about meters. I'll
level with you. An "additive needle" is not a rising needle
when you go Rock hunting. The mechanism is that the needle
goes up and it looks like a rise, but an "additive needle"
is an analytic term. This is an analysis term.

Now, we are not describing manifestations of the meter; we
assume that you know those. Now let's talk about meaningful
movements of that. Additive is an analytic term by which
you analyze whether or not you've got a Rock. You add the
same sort of thing on top of it to see if they add and make
the needle rise. An additive needle is turned on on
purpose. It is a "rising needle" as far as technical motion
is concerned, but look, it is not just a rising needle. Do
you understand that? It's a diagnostic needle that the
auditor turns on.

He thinks he has a basic-basic of some kind or another.
He's got the Rock, he thinks. Let's prove it!

Now, the way he proves it is: one, does it stick and arrest
the rising sweep of the needle? Does it kill that rise?
Now, we've gotten rid of rise. Now don't get rid of rise so
thoroughly that you don't want it - the needle ever to go
up again. It's going to go up when you get into processing.
You're going to see that rising needle happen; otherwise,
how in the name of common sense will he ever make any
ground to drop through?

When you process this with Help it is going to rise and
rise and rise for maybe an hour or two and then all of a
sudden it goes do-do-do-do-do-do-oooo and
drop-drop-drop-drop-drop-drop-drop-drop-drop-drop and then
rise-rise-rise-rise-rise, not so far this time, and then
drop-drop-drop. That's just the action of a tone arm while
processing. We're not talking about processing here, we're
talking about Rock hunting!

Now, up we go with additive needle. How do you make a
needle become an additive needle? If you've got the Rock,
then things you dream up which are similar to it will add
onto it and nothing else will. Got this?

Now, a sudden fall of the needle, we call this just a fall,
becomes a drop, additive drop, when it blows a lock off of
the Rock. You got this? That's a drop, an additive and a drop.

Now, if someone were doing real clean work on this, he'd
probably call it a "subtractive needle" because it is the
Rock that you are adding to and subtracting from.

Now, you are no longer working with the idle, spin-about,
random motions of an E-Meter. You're at cause-point on this
meter. You've located something you consider the Rock; you
prove it out. How do you prove it out?

You make things add to it and you make things subtract from
it. It's just like arithmetic except arithmetic hasn't any
real basic purpose.

Let's say - give an example. We got a pc, he's in there and
he's sitting there and the needle is rising and rising and
falling and falling and sticking here and doing this and
doing that and he's saying, "Ouch." And he's saying, "I
wonder where I am going because I am not going anyplace.
And if I could just get out of this, I could get into it
better." You know, standard orderly frame of mind. And the
needle reflects what he's wondering about and speculating
about and which way it's going and which way it isn't going
and so forth and it's just doing a bunch of randomness.

Now, you could sit there as a spectator to the end of your
days without doing anything as an auditor and you'd still
have this needle motion. It's as true in analyzing a case
as it is in running one. You, the auditor, have to take
charge! You can no longer be just a spectator. And in Rock
hunting, as in nowhere else, do you have to take charge!

Now, you're trained basically to obey the Auditor's Code
and not to evaluate for the preclear. The first time you
learn you have to get out of this rut is when you become an
Instructor. Always evaluate for the student. Never fail to
invalidate the student's wrong data. Never fail to
invalidate it. Don't let him go walking around in a bog
believing something wrong. Now, that's the role of an
Instructor and it's exactly reverse to the Auditor's Code.
An Instructor's Code, Auditor's Code; they're two entirely
different things.

Now, you are more or less working on an Instructor's Code
when you are doing Rock hunting. Never fail to evaluate,
let him have it. Work him over! Just like we used to do way
back when, you always did an exploratory to find if a guy
had a bullet in him; we didn't have x-ray machines. Sounds
kind of grim, doesn't it? Is it better to let that bullet
sit in his guts and rot, finally kill him with gangrene?
No, it's better to make a little slit and stick your
fingers in there and see if you can find the lead; much
better, let me assure you.

Later on we got very modern, we decided to wash our hands
first. And perhaps even what we're doing now, we will learn
how to wash our hands.

But the thing to do now is to find that bullet, not to find
it cleanly or to find it smoothly. You understand? But to
find it! And if that means that there is such a thing as
you stalling up the case and sending it appetite over tin
cup in some fashion because of some factor you or we do not
know about yet, then that's just too doggone bad. You
understand?

So the first, foremost thing is guts! You got to have nerve
and you have to take charge and you have to add things onto
the case and subtract things off the case. It's just like
you sitting there saying to the fellow, "I know what's
wrong with you. You're homosexual." You know, you wouldn't
do this to a preclear, would you? No, you wouldn't do that
to a preclear. Maybe he is one but you wouldn't do that to
him. No, no.

Well, if you will preserve this kind of a diffident
attitude while you're Rock hunting, you'll have had it. "We
must avoid homosexuals because it'll hurt his feelings." Oh
no, we got an entirely reverse look when we're doing Rock
hunting. We say, "What'll hurt his feelings but good!
Where's the bullet?" So we look for those buttons. You got
it?

I was auditing a preclear one day that had a history of
lesbianism and I learned this lesson but good. She was very
sensitive about it and wanted to get over it. I knew this.
I knew that this was a broken-up case. I mean the person
was in bad shape. She was very spinny. And I wasn't hunting
Rocks; I was being an auditor. I was hunting Rocks but I
was - didn't realize to the degree I was being an auditor.
And do you know for about twenty-five minutes I left that
whole subject alone, just as clean as anything, I just left
it alone. A good auditor would never mention it.

Now, having to shift valences in the middle of the stream
is quite interesting. You all of a sudden are going to
evaluate for people. You're going to pound them in. You're
going to knock their buttons flat. You're going to
restimulate them. You're going to chew them up. You're
going to get this case messed up one way or the other and
find out what it's all about, and be sure you've found out!
That's quite a shift from healing the case and taking care
of them.

It's like the medico, in trying to get the bullet out, has
four loblolly boys holding the patient down who is
screaming at high C and he says, "Goddamnit, sit still!"
You understand, the duress of the moment brings about the
reaction.

Now, maybe later on he will be able to slap an anesthetic
mask over his face and lose about 75 percent more patients
this way. You don't have to add the unconsciousness on.
They are better off if they never go unconscious as you can
understand with engrams. We were more right in the
seventeenth century than in the nineteenth.

You sit on his head and get the bullet out, and then
afterwards you're a good nurse. You're gentle as you sew
him up and you speak to him in a friendly fashion. You make
sure he gets some good chow. You understand?

Male voice: Yes.

All right, so you sit on his head and get the Rock and then
you pat him on the shoulder, patch up all the ARC breaks
and roll as an auditor. See, you're two different
individuals, and the main trouble most of you are having
are shifting gears.

It looks sometimes to your Instructor or the Director of
Processing like you're missing in nerve when you won't
dive. That's sometimes the way it looks to them. But I know
what it is. You're too well trained in mercy.

You've got this individual sitting there as I had this
lesbian and at the end of twenty-five minutes I suddenly
realized that I was being "awfully nice." And I was getting
nowhere. Take me twenty-five minutes to find a Rock! Am I
slipping?

So I just broke out my Scientological scalpel and I said,
"Women are nice, aren't they? Particularly in bed."
Dahhhhhhwwwwww! Wild needle slams and so forth. First lock
of the Rock that came off of that case was being in charge,
way, way back on the track, as the high priestess of the
vestal virgins who weren't virgin anymore, for which she
was quietly and lengthily cooked over a slow fire, and
which was making her avoid being a housewife because
housewives have to cook. One of the innumerable
computations that came off of this case.

When I made up my mind to get in there and pitch, when I
made up my mind to sharpen it up and slice, I got it.

And let's say about the only thing that is between the
preclear and his Rock is not-knowingness and stupidity.
That's really the only thing between the preclear and his Rock.

Well, I'll tell you the only thing that's between the
auditor and the Rock: diffidence, politeness, feeling he
mustn't invade somebody else's privacy, avoiding the
obvious because it "wouldn't quite be nice," refusing to
evaluate for the preclear.

Lord, it's certainly head-on evaluation when you say, "A
lie factory." Isn't it? You say, "How about a lie factory?"
Well, what are you telling him? You're telling him, "I
think you're a liar."

How about some guy you've got on the needle like I had a
couple of times in the last couple of days, and I said, "An
answer factory." Now I was really chopping him down, wasn't
it? He was giving me very glib answers to everything I
said, so I just said, "An answer factory."

Well, the funny part of it is, if you're really going for
broke, it's an odd thing but they never resent it, if
you're forthright and are doing your job. The only thing
they resent is when you don't do your job!

So if you're trying to preserve the good opinion of the
preclear, where you or the auditor are concerned, you have
only one thing to worry about: Do your job! That's what the
preclear wants, really and basically, and what keeps him
in-session. And the longer you lallygag around it and the
nicer you are and the slower you are and the dumber you are
about getting in there and pitch, why, the more upset the
preclear will become. So a fast, tight, short, close, bang
approach is much better.

All right, let's say that we've got this individual on the
meter and we're sitting there and the thing is rising,
rising, rising, and we say, "An experimental robot? A
spaceship?" something of this sort, you know. We look at
him first - we wouldn't do this if he had a rising, rising
needle. If he just had a plain needle we would ask him,
"What would reach people?" And he comes up with a lot of
computations of what would reach people. We finally get a
halt on the meter of one kind or another; it's a straight,
simple case. I'm now going to give you a tough case, see?

We got a rise-rise-rise-rise-rise and no matter what we say
that damn needle just keeps on coming up and you finally
feel like getting in the case yourself and holding the
needle down! No matter what you say, it rises!

And we finally get him on something - we are finally getting
real smart and we say, "A woman collector?" And the needle
goes dit-dit-dit-boom. And you say, "What, look at this
thing. Ah-ha-ha-ha-ha. A woman collector, huh?
Heh-heh-heh!" Well, believe me, that must be awfully late
on the track, don't you see? But nevertheless you've got a
collector of some kind or another, and you look at this.

Now, how do you know if it's it? It's just now sitting
there quietly and it's swinging through maybe an inch of
arc and it's coming up and it's sticking and then it's kind
of falling off and it's sluggish, and it's coming up and
sticking. You didn't get a good clean stick; it just
stopped rising. Well, boy that's good enough.

One of the first things you do, and don't let me catch you
not doing it, is write it down on a piece of paper, the
first thing that made it stick.

Now, about the first thing you examine about it: does he
know anything about it? That's what you look at. He's being
very glib about a "woman collector." You get suspicious of
it, merely because he seems to be so glib and knowing about
the whole thing, see?

Of course, circuits do protect themselves and glibness can
be a form of protection, but they usually say daahh. You
know, the guy is sitting in a chair and you say, "A chair
stacker." And the guy says, "A what?" And you say, "A chair
stacker. What would a chair stacker be?" That's one of the
reasons you ask him to keep describing what these things
would be is to get his not-knowingness reaction. It's the
first thing you've got.

First, you got this stuck; you finally got a stuck and then
you got a notknowingness reaction. Boy, that's awful good,
but don't worry about the not-knowingness reaction if you
didn't get it. Go right on and test this thing called
"woman collector."

Do you know how to test it? Darned few of you do. But let's
take a look at this thing. Let's add on women, late on the
track, right around present time that you dream up; then we
can be sure they're not locks on the case. Sometimes you
get kind of telepathic and as-is some. Don't worry about
that. It's the aggregate dream-up and what it does. Add
some women and then you get an additive needle.

And as long as you add some women that you dream up to the
case - you say, "Now, nice tall blondes with fur headdresses
and nothing else on," see? He's never met such a girl in
this lifetime; they wear feather headdresses, everybody
knows - or what century is this?

And now again you've got the needle starting up slightly
but it's an additive needle. It isn't the old rise, you
see, you added something on, see? So you say, "A green
woman, bright green with ruby eyes." Once in a while you
miss. You kind of pick it up out of his bank and you'll
blow one, but that's really a miss if you're trying for an
additive needle and it goes up just a little bit more.

In other words, you dream up things similar or additive to
what he'd have there that you stopped the needle with. You
got it?

Now, you just do this on an evaluation: bang-bang-bang-
bang-bang! You see? You just say, "It's this. It's that and
so on. How about this? Wouldn't you like that? Doesn't this
seem this way and that to you?" You know?

Once in a while it can get real tough. You'll slam one at
the preclear and it'll really not be so much a dream-up as
straight on his case and the preclear just goes boom! You
know? Duh! Well, boy that's an indicative situation.

Now, you blow one accidentally or on purpose.

Now, as this needle rises, your question is this: Does it
rise only to the degree that, and only as long as, you add
things to it?

Now, you could blow the needle this way. You could say, "Do
you recall the tall, naked blonde with the fur headdress?
Now, if it's a real tough Rock chain it might not blow, but
occasionally that itself will blow off of the Rock chain.
You put one on and you blew the same one off. Now, the
green woman with the ruby eyes, you can blow that one off
the chain. Now, that's just one way of blowing down the
thing, getting a drop, being subtractive.

The most reliable way - now you added to it and it only went
up to the degree that you added to it and it's still stuck.
You got it? It didn't begin this rise-rise-rise-rise-rise
again, see?

And you went around in back of the thing and you decided to
pull it down. One of the most reliable ways of doing it,
let's say it was a "woman collector," "Do you recall any
women you've collected in this lifetime?" Now, you've given
him the computation and you've now hung him with it by
accusing him of having dramatized it. You'd say, "Boy, this
is the weirdest thing to do to anybody," you know? And you
say, "Do you recall any women you've collected in this
lifetime?" And the fellow says, "Oh, I don't know dah-dah."
And all of a sudden, "Well, yes!" Boom! See? And it blew a
lock off and then came back up and stuck. And you can just
keep blowing locks off of this thing by recalling things in
this lifetime. Do you understand?

So when you as the auditor can subtract or add to the stuck
needle at will, you must have the computation. Isn't that
right? And that's "proving one up."

Now, supposing that one didn't prove up? Well, instead of
"collector," let's use the word "consumer." These are
standard words. "A woman consumer." You can try any kind of
wording. "Female consumer" might work much better than
"woman collector," symbols being what they are. Might work
infinitely better. Do you see how it could?

And so you change your wording around and you keep plugging
at the same general computation until you take each one of
the words you used in the phrase like "woman collector" and
vary woman for a while and then vary collector for a while
and you may come up with a much better stuck. Anything
you've got up to that time, by the way, however, will work.
And that's what you should know, that it will work. Okay?

You could run it. The needle stopped on "woman collector,"
just run "woman collector." Oh, you're going to be a little
bit wrong and the case is going to run a few more hours
than it would, and you'll be into a little trouble
semantically and he'll have trouble clearing the command.
You get the idea? But nevertheless you could do it. It
would work. All right. You add to the needle and subtract
from the needle.

Now, I'm going to give you rapidly the four types of case.

The first case is the simple case. There's nothing to this
case; it just sticks on an object.

Now, you always run terminals, never run the particles
emanating from the terminal. Run the "hand" not the
"weapon," run the "head" not the "hand." You get the idea?
The terminal which does the emanating or receiving or
collecting or giving is always better than the line. Run
terminals, not lines or conditions. That's always better.

Someday you'll find yourself running a line and it'll work,
but all right, don't be surprised if you get into lots of
trouble and it runs for a long time. Always prefer terminals.

Now, on this simple case, you simply nail a terminal of one
kind or another and the needle sticks and that's that.
That's class one.

Class two is the consumer case. The consumer factory case.
This person is in a secondary condition; he is adding to
and subtracting from the bank at such speed that you get
odd consistencies of rise or fall.

Now, you've never seen a constantly falling case, I'm sure,
not a constantly falling case, but they do exist. They're
just obsessively falling. They're creeping down-down-down,
just as cases creep up-up-up. But it's a rarity. The one
you'll mainly run into is obsessive rise and it just keeps
rising-rising-rising-rising-rising. You understand?

Now, to stop that rise requires a type of consumer of
something and a type of factory or a type of factory of
something. Something is manufacturing or producing
something and-or something is consuming something. One or
the other are going to work and stop that needle. You got
that?

Now, the third kind is really the broken consumer, the
broken factory case. The guy accumulates broken factories.
Have you got - you got that one? Hm? He's really a failed
consumer case or a failed factory case. And the classes of
things you ask on this particular one all had to do with
things that are busted down and don't work anymore and so
forth.

The fourth kind of case is really not a kind of case. It's
a condition of the meter where the individual is already
stuck in the Rock. He's already firmly stuck in the Rock
and you're simply getting the stuck-free vacillations of PT.

And those are the four kinds of cases and the analysis of
these four kinds of cases is handled in different ways.

The first one, you simply think up of items and objects of
one kind or another that could reach people. You ask him,
"What could reach people?" These items and objects could
reach people, and then you stick the needle with those and
you run whatever you get.

The second kind of case, you get the factory or the
consumer; the collector or the producer, you see, one of
those things, making things or absorbing things, and you
get the thing. And it may be just "consumer"; it may be
just "collector" just like that, you know, and that stops it.

The last one rises much worse. Much worse. Much steadier,
more stable and so forth in its rise. More determined. It's
a real vicious rise and sometimes the needle is slamming.
I've already run into one person in off the street whose
needle was just always slamming and he belonged in the last
condition of case, but he turned into a third stage case as
soon as the slam was gotten out of the road.

Now, the last type of case is of course, simply the type of
case that is already in a Rock and is reacting to the Rock.
Now, the way you handle that particular case, usually, if
you don't know anything more about it and can't find out
anything more about it, is to use Connectedness to clean
off the needle reaction or use another "Mock up somebody
who would be pleased with your condition," that sort of
thing. And you clean up the needle manifestation and then
analyze again for the Rock.

[The old reel ends here, the final segment is from the
clearsound version only.]

You got this?

Now, you can't lose on any one of these. There are many
vagaries, there are many things to say, there are many
things to challenge and so forth. We haven't time at the
moment to go into these things.

So, let's take a momentary break, please.

Thank you.

[End of lecture.]


