Subject: FZ Bible FIRST POSTULATE TAPES 11/35 (20th ACC)
Date: 24 Nov 1999 23:47:42 -0000
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

FIRST POSTULATE TAPES 11/35 (20th American Advanced Clinical Course)

**************************************************

Contents

20th ACC - First Postulate Cassettes [clearsound]

New #    Old #   Date     Title

20ACC-1  (1)   14 Jul 58 OPENING LECTURE
20ACC-2  (1A)  14 Jul 58 OPENING LECTURE - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-3  (2)   15 Jul 58 ACC PROCEDURE OUTLINED E-METER TRS
20ACC-4  (2A)  15 Jul 58 ACC PROC OUTLINED - E-METER TRS - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-5  (3)   16 Jul 58 COURSE PROCEDURE OUTLINED
20ACC-6  (3A)  16 Jul 58 COURSE PROCEDURE OUTLINED - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-7  (4)   17 Jul 58 BEGINNING AND ENDING SESSION
20ACC-8  (4A)  17 Jul 58 BEGINNING AND ENDING SESSION - Q AND A PERIOD
20ACC-9  (5)   18 Jul 58 ACC TRAINING PROCEDURE
20ACC-10 (5A)  18 Jul 58 ACC TRAINING PROCEDURE - Q & A PERIOD
20ACC-11 (6)   21 Jul 58 THE KEY WORDS (BUTTONS) OF SCIENTOLOGY CLEARING
20ACC-12 (6A)  21 Jul 58 THE KEY WORDS (BUTTONS) OF SCN - Q & A PERIOD
20ACC-13 (7)   22 Jul 58 THE ROCK
20ACC-14 (7A)  22 Jul 58 THE ROCK - Q & A PERIOD
20ACC-15 (8)   23 Jul 58 SPECIAL EFFECT CASES,  ANATOMY OF
20ACC-16 (8A)  23 Jul 58 SPECIAL EFFECT CASES, ANATOMY - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-17 (9)   24 Jul 58 ANATOMY OF NEEDLES - DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE
20ACC-18 (9A)  24 Jul 58 ANATOMY OF NEEDLES - DIAG. PROC - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-19 (10)  25 Jul 58 THE ROCK: PUTTING THE PC AT CAUSE
20ACC-20 (10A) 25 Jul 58 Q&A PERIOD - CLEARING THE COMMAND
20ACC-21 (11)  28 Jul 58 ACC COMMAND SHEET - GOALS OF AUDITING
20ACC-22 (12)  29 Jul 58 ACC COMMAND SHEET (cont.)
20ACC-23 (13)  30 Jul 58 ACC COMMAND SHEET (cont. 2)
20ACC-24 (14)  31 Jul 58 RUNNING THE CASE AND THE ROCK
20ACC-25 (15)   1 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING
20ACC-26 (15A)  1 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING (cont.)
20ACC-27 (16)   4 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING (cont. 2)
20ACC-28 (16A)  4 Aug 58 CASE ANALYSIS - ROCK HUNTING - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-29 (17)   5 Aug 58 ARC
20ACC-30 (18)   6 Aug 58 THE ROCK - ITS ANATOMY
20ACC-31 (19)   7 Aug 58 THE MOST BASIC ROCK OF ALL
20ACC-32 (19A)  7 Aug 58 THE MOST BASIC ROCK OF ALL - Q&A PERIOD
20ACC-33 (20)   8 Aug 58 AUDITOR INTEREST
20ACC-34 (20A)  8 Aug 58 REQUISITES AND FUNDAMENTALS OF A SESSION
20ACC-35 (21)  15 Aug 58 SUMMARY OF 20TH ACC

The clearsound set includes an Appendix containing two HCOBs.  This
has been included with the first lecture above.

Note that old 15B "Q & A PERIOD" of 2 Aug 58 was marked as missing in
the Flag Master List and was later found by Gold.  Its absense here
probably means that they found it to be the same as old 16A (20ACC-28
in the above list).

Old number 19B "Q & A Period" of 8 Aug in the Flag Master List
is also omitted but 20ACC-32 (old 19A) is extremely long and probably
contains both old 19A and 19B.

Note 20ACC-2 (1A) does not appear on the Flag Master List but
appears to be genuine.

We were able to check ten of these against the old reels and
found minor omissions [marked ">" in the transcripts.]

**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************

20ACC-11 (6)   21 Jul 58 THE KEY WORDS (BUTTONS) OF SCIENTOLOGY CLEARING

THE KEY WORDS (BUTTONS) OF SCIENTOLOGY CLEARING

A lecture given on 21 July 1958

[clearsound checked agaisnt the old reel.]

Thank you.

Well, I understand that we've started an ACC.

Audience: Yeah. Yes.

All right. This is the sixth lecture, 20th ACC, July 21st,
1958, and I'm going to take up today the key words of
Scientology.

We are continuing our discussion of ACC Procedure, but it
is necessary before we go much further to pinpoint what we
are trying to do with preclears.

Now, I know what I am trying to do with preclears when I'm
auditing somebody, but I'm not foolish enough to believe
that everybody does.

The intention to clear is the first and foremost intention
that an auditor has to have in order to clear. And every
now and then something gets in his road so that he really
thinks, well, he has some little reservation on the matter,
you know: "I don't know, this boy is a pretty wild boy and
if we let him loose and let him become very powerful, why,
maybe we'd just better drop the ashtray, hm? And when we
lean on the wall, why, why not lean just a little bit too
far over and break the window or something like that. Or
let's change commands suddenly."

Now, what I'm saying is not accusative. There can be a
reactive reaction to setting somebody free which a person
himself doesn't even recognize or know about because if he
did, it wouldn't be there and it wouldn't be effective.

But where an individual makes a great many mistakes, for
instance, and makes a great many flubs in auditing (after
he knows how) when he is trying to clear somebody, we must
assume that there is something wrong with pushing this
fellow all the way up the line.

Well, now there's - really it's quite amazing, but it's quite
amazing to realize instead of being critical, you see, of
this restraint on clearing somebody, it's quite amazing
that people would be of sufficiently good heart (if they
are all animals, the way the phrenologist said they were)
that they would actually make another person more powerful
than themselves.

Now, that is apparently, on the fundamental, a little bit
of a sacrifice, don't you see?

Here's a fellow who isn't Clear and he busily is clearing
somebody. Well, all right. It's firmly in his mind,
perhaps, that this other individual is going to wind up
more powerful than he is.

And for an auditor who isn't getting any auditing to sit
down and clear people, assembly-line fashion, really
requires more good heart than has ever been attributed to
man.

It all works out all right because the truth of the matter
is, when an individual becomes truly effective he becomes
much less dangerous. When he's truly effective he's much
less dangerous. That's quite interesting. But almost a -
almost a comment here which calls itself a liar, he
becomes far more dangerous. He becomes effective.

So, let's put it in this wise instead. An individual,
before he is Clear, is destructively dangerous. He's
destructively dangerous. He really is the person who is
dangerous. But now we clear him, he becomes effectively
dangerous to destructive people.

And if you think this thought all the way through, and even
recognize it intellectually, you'll have far less trouble
clearing people.

There isn't a one of us who hasn't been shot, maimed,
hauled over the glowing coals, put on the rack; there's
hardly any of us who hasn't decorated, one time or another,
a gallows: all evidences of the brutality and cruelty of man.

And very often we have flown ourselves as a flag to this
brutality, and have offered ourselves as the factual
example of the cruelty and brutality of man.

When we go around with a broken arm persisting or a broken
neck persisting or something of this sort, we are simply
evidencing the fact that man is brutal.

So to say that a person who is not Clear has a slightly
reactive computation on the subject of clearing people is
not to point out an extraordinary circumstance. It is an
ordinary circumstance that very often you have your doubts.
That's ordinary, that's routine.

But if you think this thing through, by clearing somebody
we have an "effective." And clearing somebody requires that
we also understand the optimum solution to problems and
that is - the optimum solution to any problem - is the
greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics. That's
the optimum solution.

Clears tend to solve things this way; just tend to. You
understand they really don't all the way across the boards.
They tend to solve things on an optimum solution.

Now, when we go from Clear to OT, we pass the borderline of
judgment - and I'll be talking about that later - we pass this
borderline called judgment, and that is: how many dynamics
an individual computes on simultaneously. Now we get the
differences a bit ironed out here when we see somebody who
is already Clear thinking very clearly on the first dynamic.

We are occasionally, quite often, rebuffed. We say this
fellow isn't taking into account at all his family or he
isn't taking into account at all this, that or the other
thing. Well, he struggles along and finds out that this
isn't the right answer and he modifies his conduct
accordingly and we see a Clear as a person who is becoming
reoriented. And all of his educational factors are still
present.

I've often told you if you clear a witch doctor, you've got
a good witch doctor. You haven't necessarily got somebody
who will no longer use the tom-tom and the aromatic,
hypnotic powders and all this sort of thing. His whole
educational pattern along the line is oriented on this item
"witch doctor."

You clear a con man and you've got a cleared con man. See,
we've already had an example of that. We've already had an
example of that. One chap after he was cleared went home
and his own judgment concerning his conduct was really
clouded to this degree: that what he now knew about life
didn't quite mesh with the way he thought life ought to be,
you see? Now he thought life ought to be a bit different.
But all of his training and his pattern and his
professional patter, you might say, were all lined up with
"con man."

He couldn't resist telling people some of the more wild
tales concerning clearing. He couldn't resist mis-selling
clearing - you get the idea - at the moment. And it's taken
him about a quarter of a year to climb out of this slough of
despond. He's climbing out of it little by little. But he's
having to reinvent his entire orientation. He's managing it
but he's really not becoming more Clear, he's going from
Clear to OT. You see this?

A Clear, when he finds his educational background does not
agree with the environment and is not useful to him, is
capable of changing that educational background. He isn't
fixed or set with it.

But to say that he won't use it the next day after he's
cleared is to expect far, far too much. What else does he
have to use? It's educational data! How do people react? To
what do they react?

Well, you set up a little pitch stand on the street, and
you fill some bottles full of water, and put a little mud
in it, and you say it's Indian swamp root oil. And you give
a much more persuasive speech on the matter and they buy
much more - many more of these bottles. But before this time
he was never capable of inspecting the actual activity. Now
he inspects the activity, and after he's been doing this
for a few weeks, he said, "You know, I keep saying this is
therapeutic, maybe I ought to put some therapeutic stuff in
these bottles." This is a brand-new thought to him, you see?

Now, climbing to a state of Clear subjectively requires a
second action: that one climb to it objectively. And there
is no living done in an auditing room. You see, one doesn't
re-experience the environment in which he spends
twenty-four hours a day in the auditing room. That is an
artificial environment and it can do remarkable things, but
it isn't an environment that teaches the person a great
many things, do you see?

He learns from himself. He learns from his past experience.
He rehashes existence in its entirety. He overhauls it. He
cognites this and that. But he is not actually vis-a-vis
with the third dynamic and sixth dynamic. See, he's not
exactly face to face with this whole thing. And he never
makes any resolutions. You really haven't heard very many
preclears suddenly resolve, "Well, after this I will be
honest!" you know, or anything like that. They don't. They
go out in the society and they make those resolutions. See,
they get it all patched together again.

That's partially this settling-out period of some little
time. And people have mistaken my statements about a
settling-out period to mean that the case settles out. No,
the settling-out period is a reorientation period and
really ought to be called such. A GE is still being mocked
up. It's still being mocked up with things wrong with it.
These things start to come right, but that's an
outer-environment thing, this mock-up that everybody can
see. And then there is the entire world outside of play and
counter-play, game and counter-game, and an individual has
to readjust to these things.

He will go along for quite a while in a tried and true
pattern and then gradually he'll move over. Man does not -
even a Clear - do tremendously, adventurously dangerous
changes. He will not suddenly shift the pattern of a whole
lifetime. He would not survive if he did.

The fellow's a streetcar conductor; you clear him. So,
instantly he's supposed to be Mozart or somebody, you know?
No, no, he goes home and becomes a streetcar conductor. And
after a while when he's still settled in - streetcar
conductor - he looks around and he sees his horizon is a
bit broader. He sees there are other things he could do,
maybe just inside the streetcar company. And the next thing
you know, he is doing more. But it's a case of doing more
rather than doing different. And then you get a good
concept of this.

But, it's dangerous not to clear somebody. That is what is
dangerous. That's what I'm trying to tell you today.

Every one of us in an aberrated state was something on the
order of the fellow, the drunk, walking down the street. He
had a great big green crocodile following him, snapping at
his heels, snapping at his heels. And the crocodile was
about six, seven feet back of him. He'd rush forward once
in a while and snap, you know, and the drunk - and the drunk
finally got to the corner and he turned around and he
looked at the crocodile, looked at him very hard, gave him
a thorough glare, and he says, "You come one step closer,
and I'll take an Alka-Seltzer and get rid of you."

Now, that's what's known as getting Clear by desperation.
And you very often find a person gets Clear by desperation.
Life is so horrible the way he is that he forces himself
out into a cleared state. Then life suddenly isn't
horrible, and there's no crocodile, and he begins to notice
the street. And he says, "What's this? A street." Well, his
former action consisted of walking along the street, so
it's that street, and he still walks along it. That he can
now change his mind and invade other streets in the absence
of the crocodile is another story.

But it is dangerous, really, not to clear somebody. If you
take somebody three-quarters of the way up, he will be
better off, that's for true. There's nothing wrong with
dropping his case right there. He'll be better off; there's
no real liability.

But this individual could have the power of reacting much
better. And that's really what a blow is. Some of you
people want to know what you are doing when you blow - you
have become more able. You have become more able to blow.

You improve somebody's mock-ups, he's more able to mock up
a reactive mind. The green crocodile is now much bigger,
much plainer and has much sharper teeth. And that is in
essence what happens when you start to clear somebody. You
give him the potential of having bigger and better green
crocodiles before he has the potential of having a street.
And that's what we call over the hump.

So, the only other word of warning that I would give you
when you start to clear somebody is: just sit down and
clear them; don't sit down and work at it; don't sit down
and improve his mock-ups; don't sit down and patch up his
field; don't sit down and get him over a couple of
aberrations because all you do is make it more possible
when you're going forward on Clear techniques - which are
quite different than other auditing techniques - as I'll
just take up here.

The first test that demonstrated how you cleared people is
one of the most interesting we have, and let's go into this
immediately. The first test that was made that demonstrated
conclusively how you cleared somebody and that people could
be cleared consisted of this: An individual was run on the
time track. And by the way, later on in this series of
lectures, we're going to take up the anatomy of what you
are treating, the anatomy of what you are handling.

Some of you tend to believe that I've changed my mind
concerning the existence of certain phenomena in the mind.
That I changed my mind didn't get rid of all the engrams in
the world and the secondaries and all the rest of them.

Now, an individual was run back on the time track and was
made to inspect a mental image picture of a moment of pain
and unconsciousness. Then he was brought to present time
and run on Step 6 to improve his mockups. Now, another
individual was run on the time track back to a moment of
pain and unconsciousness and then on successive days
without any processing was run back to this same moment and
was caused to inspect it.

Now, the behavior in this particular case was the moment of
pain and unconsciousness deintensified and erased. He was
just run back down the time track into it and then pulled
out of the backtrack and pushed into present time again.
Don't you see? No more therapy. See? So this we know by
experience was what would happen if we ran an individual
back, let us say, to a tonsillectomy and we did this every
day for many days, eventually he'd say, "Oh, to hell with
this engram, you know?" And he'd be rid of it to a marked
degree. In other words, the thing became less bright, less
real, became less capable of knocking him to pieces. Now,
that's one manifestation.

Truth of the matter is he became cause over it to some
degree because something was happening with regard to it.
He was at least looking at it again. He was confronting it.
You see, there are therapeutic values involved in this test.

But now the other fellow that was run back to this mental
image picture - to his mental image picture, you see - and
then brought back to present time and treated with Step 6,
reacted entirely different.

Each time he was given some Step 6 to improve his ability
to mock up. And the next time he was run back to his
tonsillectomy, it was glowing much brighter! And the
instruments were much more solid. His ability to confront
it was also improving, but that thing was getting to be
full 3-D technicolor, complete with its pain and
unconsciousness. It was getting to be a much better engram.

Several tests of this character were made and this became
the most important research project I had ever engaged in
except, perhaps, the first time I engaged in the search for
a common denominator for life. This became the single, most
important experiment, because it brought about this fact:
When applied generally here and there, and worked with, it
was demonstrated that as an individual's ability to create
was improved, so improved every mental image picture he
had, including those of the GE. And therefore we were left
finally with this one inevitable conclusion.

Now, if somebody else wishes to make another conclusion out
of this, or could find another one to make, I would be very
happy to listen to it very thoroughly because I, myself
questioned this thing and put it under a microscope and
scratched my head and snarled about it.

I achieved this originally on a sort of an intuitive
deductive process. I said, "Well, this would be the case."
But then I didn't dare believe it because it looked too
good and therefore checked it, and checked it several times.

As an individual's personal ability to create is improved,
so improve all mental image pictures. All mental image
pictures. Get that all! It doesn't mean that a bank is
being made by the GE. It doesn't mean that there are a
bunch of things making a bank independent of the preclear.

We should have suspected something like this a long time
ago just by the fact that an individual could change his
reaction to an incident in the past by auditing. If an
individual could change his conduct in the present by
auditing some picture of the past, he must have been the
causative factor of that picture.

Now it goes even further than this. He must have been the
causative factor of the incident, otherwise the only thing
he could erase out of it was causation. And we get another
factor involved. He must have been responsible for the
incident if responsibility would resolve the incident!
Whooo!

In other words, his creativeness gave him not just the
picture, but the incident. We have to conclude something on
this order. And sure enough if we go back far enough, or
look far enough in any case we will find out they decided
to have and decided to cause every experience they ever had.

Creation and cause are more or less synonymous in our work.

But here is this individual capable of mocking up. We
improve his capability of mocking up and we improve all
these mental image pictures. Oh, wow!

The tremendous importance of this thing I did not miss. It
simply meant that all you had to do was get an individual
to create and increase his willingness to create, and
increase it and increase it and increase it even though it
half killed him, to have him suddenly admit that he was
creating each and every part of the bank and thus you got,
with that recognition, a vanquishment of the entire bank
and the fellow had no longer a reactive mind.

If a person still has some little fragment, as he's going
to Clear, then there's just a little fragment that he is
not willing to create. And that's how you take out the
fragments. The whole thing doesn't collapse at once, you
see?

The individual says, "Well, I've got it all solved, but
there's one person I would never create! Never! Because I
certainly do not want to be like Aunt Agatha." And you get
this little Aunt Agatha valence sticking around on a person
who is otherwise Clear.

The last few moments of play on clearing are quite
upsetting to an auditor because the fellow ought to be
Clear, he's made all of the cognitions necessary to being
Clear and yet he won't be cause on some little tiny sector
of life, and he's not Clear on that sector.

And as you clear people, you will then see once more this
same proposition demonstrated: that area of existence in
which the person is unwilling to be cause, tends to be (not
necessarily is) but tends to be the master of that person.
And we get responsibility as the other factor with create.

That for which a person will take no responsibility,
devours him hook, line and shoe buckles.

"Well, that's my wife. She can do as she please. I'm - no
responsibility of mine what she does. That's just modern
life." God knows what happens after that. Lord knows what
quicksand and what bogs this fellow is about to walk into.

Now, the funny part of it is, because of the enormous
complexities of life, he doesn't necessarily walk into that
particular bog. He waits two centuries, finds another girl
who reminds him of the first girl and even though he is
desperately trying to take responsibility for this woman,
she does him in. And one day she and her lover has his head
on cabbage salad. And he just can't understand what
happened to him. He never would have caused this, he will
tell you or a psychoanalyst, or somebody. He's just
talking, you see? He couldn't have caused this! This is one
thing he couldn't have caused! And the alligator tears are
splashing like mad. Real alligator tears.

There was a sector of his past where he didn't take
responsibility which goes first postulate ahead of the
area where he did and it drives him nuts. The thing can't
work  out.

He knows instinctively that if he just takes responsibility
for his environment, and the people around him, and for
living a life, he's all set. You see, he knows this
instinctively that if it really comes down to the last push
(everybody will tell you this) that they've got to get in
there and do their job, and so forth.

Even - you get a drunk (who is the most irresponsible person
in the world); he's abandoned his family and he's abandoned
his job and you go down to Alcoholics Anonymous, you find
them knee-deep. You can be knee-deep in a minute in people
like this. And every one of them will tell you, "Well, I
realize that I ought to stand up and assert my willpower
and lay off liquor and go back in and support the family
and take care of things and go back and take care of my
job. And I realize this. But... But..." And they got a
bunch of excuses.

Everybody, no matter how far gone he is, still has some
feeling like well, if he - at least if he had turned
around on life, at least if he had picked up a few
responsibilities at one time or another, he would have won.

That's self-blame. Self-blame is the assertion that one
didn't take responsibility when he should have. And
"blaming somebody else" is another mechanism entirely.
That's saying responsibility didn't exist, but that's
saying it right now that it still doesn't exist. You know,
it's "Their fault, their fault, their fault." All he's
saying is "Responsibility doesn't exist." He's just laying
one up for the year 2250.

All right. Life, then, apparently imposes this fantastic
discipline: that a person must be responsible for all of
his acts; that he must be willing and must know that he is
willing to be at cause in every situation; and must know
that he is creating what he is creating for him to be in
excellent condition. Now, that is the regimen that life
lays down.

Now, the discipline of the sixth dynamic says that you
must be willing to change.

So we get another button. It may be a little obscure up to
this point that I'm talking about specific buttons, but I
am just talking about buttons. Time. Pocketa-pocketa-pocketa,
up the time track, you know?

How come this stuff is always solid at the exact instant
that you look at it? You know, that's one of the most
amazing problems. You can ask a little kid that and really
boggle him. You say, "How come that stuff is always solid
just at the exact instant you look at it?" And you say,
"Boy, that is some trick, isn't it, you know?"

Well, change. If a person is unwilling to have any change
occurs, then he sticks himself all over the time track.
See? And he doesn't let this stuff go pocketa-pocketa-pocketa
but he takes a mental image picture of it and says, "You will
not pocketa." And that sticks him but thoroughly, and there
he is not pocketa-ing and that's the end of that.

Auditor comes along a few generations or centuries or
thousands of years later and says, "Come up to present time."

And he says in effect, "Present time has long evaded me.
Time has marched on. Anything that you are looking at now
is future to me. Life is sad. Life is cruel. And I didn't
change. And furthermore, I'm not going to."

A thetan would rather stop than move. It's apparently more
therapeutic to him and more interesting to him to stop
something dead still than to move. But he is the author of
motion, so therefore he shouldn't be antipathetic to motion.

But perhaps, just as a neat little game, he propounds this
weighty one: "I will contest everything that moves." This
eventually results in contesting everything that changes
and the progress of MEST through time: matter, energy and
space through time. Change: change is the keynote of time.

Change, incidentally, is the keynote of any case on which
you are working. It is the fundamental.

What are you trying to do when you're running goals? You're
trying to get him to postulate a change. Definition of
Goals Processing: any attempt to get the preclear to
postulate change.

Now any way you could get him to do that, you'll wind up
with a goal.

A goal is a not-here. It isn't just future. It's not-here.
It postulates that he is going to go someplace. And it is a
highly covert activity in which the auditor engages. It's
very covert. The auditor is saying, "Come on now. Can't I
possibly persuade you to move up the time track just that
much. It won't kill you, you know? It's just - just that
much. Just try. Try it now. Try it."

Fellow says, "Well, my goal for the session could be to get
rid of the session, get over it and get done with it." Oh,
but even in that bitterness he has still postulated this
little tiny change. He said, "There's going to be an end of
session." And that moment of time is different than the
moment of time in which he's postulating it. So he was
handling the future, wasn't he? This is a sneaker. Carried
out to its final limit it would move the person bodily on
the time track and carry him on up to present time.

Most of the goals he's given you, he gives you early in
processing, are the things he - the reverse of the things
he doesn't want to have happen in his future. And his future
may very well be 1066. He's still trying to keep from being
the last surviving officer of the Battle of Hastings. See?
And he's saying...

So it's the easy thing to do, is for him to stay in cadet
school, you see, at 1005, or something like that, you know?
That's the best thing to do.

And you find him parked in 1005 and you say, "What happened
in 1005 to make him stick?" Oh, it's much worse than that.
Something did happen but he is using it to keep from going
into 1066. Do you get the idea?

Don't think a thetan doesn't use his stuck points. His
ability to have a greater rationale than the mechanics is
phenomenal, wonderful, beautiful.

The individual has more reasons for these mechanics than
you can easily count in a long session. But the principal
one is no future, no change. Therefore he rebels against a
future which he went into. See, he went up to the future
and he says, "Not for me!" and does a down bounce to an
earlier moment and hastily grabs on to a stuck period. And
he finds this idiotic moment where one cadet hit him over
the head with a chamber pot or something and he says - and
yeah, I had such a case one time - and all the fellow was
worried about was the fact that his fellow companions used
to hit him over the head with a chamber pot, and this was
all very Freudian, and it fitted exactly but it didn't ever
get anyplace.

All it amounted to was he didn't want to grow up in that
particular lifetime. That was all it amounted to. And he
had handed - and he had grabbed on to this nauseous incident
which he couldn't take responsibility for, had taken a
wider, more general responsibility for it, had created it,
had said he was not now creating it, and all the thing he
was trying to do was avoid responsibility for a later
moment. When responsibility was resolved for the later
moment, the earlier moment went pfzzt. Fascinating, hm? All
right.

Now, the role of an auditor is to outguess a thetan, so
auditors are obviously greater than thetans. Clearing an
auditor, then, should be much easier than clearing thetans;
and it is. Even though a good auditor will occasionally go
up in smoke under modern processing, he generally will get
himself by the nape of the neck and go back into it again.

Had an example of that the other day. Somebody told me,
"Under no circumstances will I answer that question." Told
me in devious and various ways. You know: it didn't matter,
didn't bother him, inconsequential, didn't apply to the
case. And when I finally insisted the question be answered,
I got the astonishing flashback you see, of never would the
question be answered, and all kinds of fulminations, you
see? And I flattened that particular process finally.

And you know, this person being an auditor then said to me,
"Well, I see what I've been doing. I've occasionally been
defeating myself by not really answering an auditing
question, but by faking an answer. And I've just been
holding up my processing like mad. So, I know what I was
doing and now I don't have to do that so I can be cleared
much more rapidly."

Now, what preclear off the street would have been able to
have figured this one out, see? Yet this person now, by
self-discipline, even if the incident seems to demonstrate
the question must not be answered, then this Scientologist
is going to answer the question. Get the idea?

Well, in view of the fact that there's so much beef
involved in answering some of these questions, so much
flashback, such a potential in some of this, that a
Scientologist really ought to be able to be cleared much
better than a person out in the public.

He understands more, in a highly gener- generality, he's got
more subjective reality on what is going on than somebody
else. And he doesn't necessarily surrender to his reactive
computations.

He can blow for twenty-four hours, but sooner or later he's
going to say, "Now, wait a minute!" Get the idea? And the
person out in the public never says, "Now wait a minute."

Now, what happens when clearing is taking place is not the
same thing that happened when Dianetic Auditing was taking
place. We're patching up a person by getting rid of and
getting him to confront his mental image pictures.

Now, whatever route was there and whatever it finally
developed into and however it arrived, that is not the same
thing as we are doing today. And you should understand this.

There is another method to Clear. There's an older method
to Clear. See? Way back there - possibly an easier method -
it was just getting people to confront these things and pretty
soon, pretty soon they said, "Well, they don't worry me,"
so they didn't mock them up. Do you get the idea? And they
came through a realization, one kind or another, that's so ...

We're not doing that today. We're doing a much faster, more
positive job, but that job includes a trip over the hump.
When you start to clear somebody, start to audit him toward
Clear - he might have already had some auditing in this
direction - we ask him a few questions and all of a sudden
he hits something that let's his mock-ups get much better,
brrrrp. Or we hit something that lets him take much better
responsibility for something. Of course, that's a safer one
than his mock-ups are much better. When his mock-ups are
much better, and he's not taking any greater responsibility
for them, he can get his silly head kicked off. You see that?

So, he's sitting there, he's perfectly in good shape and
everything is going along fine and so on. He is saying,
"Yes. Yes."

"Mock up a lifesaver in front of the body."

"Yes. Yes."

"Mock up a lifesaver in back of the body."

"Yes. Yes. Fine."

"Keep it from going away." And so on.

Happy, happy, and everything is fine. And all of a sudden a
fixed look starts to come on his face, you know, and ...
You say, well, the E-Meter is twitching around but that
will be all right, you know, and "All right. Beneath that
body mock up a lifesaver, and keep it from going away.

And whoooom! You're liable to get yourself into a bloodbath
situation there if you just listen to it for a moment, you
know? All of a sudden his ability to mock up increased
without his responsibility for mocking up increasing one
iota. And whenever that happened he just became the victim
about three times as much, and it can happen solidly and it
can happen very savagely.

And you can bring an individual three-quarters of the way
to Clear, and make him go dumping around like a sick
chicken for two or three weeks if you don't audit him. You
get the idea?

He's actually better off - if you can imagine this  - he
himself is better off, but he is now mocking up a reactive
bank much better than he was mocking up before. He's not
mocking up less of it, he's just mocking it up better!

And although he feels much happier... You get the idea?

So the route we are taking is one of the more violent and
adventurous routes. And you should understand that.
Therefore, it does not admit of bad auditing.

There are some routes, I am sure, which we will someday
discover which are long, perhaps, and easy, and don't knock
anybody apart. And fellows can do it without special skill
and it only takes seven or eight years. I'm sure that
someday one of those routes will come up as the favored
route, long after I'm gone and so forth, that will probably
come up - it's one of those routes will come up as a favored
route, you know.

"Well, we really ought to take this process. And a fellow
sort of does this and that and you get a session every
month at the beginning of the month or something like that
and you eventually wind up Clear, and fellows are much
happier and it's all very smooth and there's no drama
connected with it whatsoever." Very high probability, you
see?

Some generation of auditors may refuse to confront this
sort of thing, you know, and say, "Wait a minute, you know?"

But just like - just like there's some HCAs today that run
into the manifestation that you run into in a pc in running
engrams, you know, and they say, "God, what's that?" You
know? Fellow curled up in a ball in the middle of the floor
screaming at high C! Screaming "Don't stick me! Don't stick
me! Oh, please, don't do it again!" you know?

"Well, I've got to do it again, dear. Now, just lie there
and don't move," you know.

Once in a while somebody runs into one of these old engrams
that contorts the GE all out of shape, revivifies it square
on the track. But an auditor who has faced this sort of
thing doesn't have any qualms about facing it.

It's quite interesting that the head of the Los Angeles
office recently had a man who totally revivified in riding
a horse. And he was sitting there in the auditing session
riding the horse, you know, and pulling on the reins and,
"Whoa. Giddap," and sort of flinging the answers to the
auditing questions out of the corner of his mouth to the
auditor quite incidentally as he rode this horse down the
road, you know. The horse was going at a considerable
gallop, too. Total revivification. You know, the fellow
came out of it. Wasn't at all amazed at what he'd been
doing because he'd always been doing this.

So if you go directly toward clearing and steer a very
straight course, if the person is that thoroughly stuck in
an incident that he will revivify in the incident, he'll
revivify in the methods we are using. He will revivify if
you pushed it all the way through.

Now, there are ways to get around this. You can run Help,
Step 6, Help, Step 6, Help, Step 6, and occasionally throw
in a handful of Responsibility. You know, just ease it off,
even in a two-way comm, and so forth. Keep this thing out
so it doesn't necessarily tear his head off bodily and
leave it bloodily dripping upon the floor. And it's not
necessarily true that it half kills somebody but it can!
And you must remember that.

To date, has not really killed anybody, but has caused some
people to flinch; has caused them to flinch sufficiently
that they are at the beginning of the session in which it
happened.

What'd I tell you a few moments ago about the fellow being
hit on the head with a chamber pot and stuck in the
incident so he wouldn't have to go through the Battle of
Hastings again, see?

Well, there are some people at the beginning of that
auditing session wherein they hit the Rock without being
the least bit prepared to hit a Rock, and it splintered
their little canoe all over the river.

All of a sudden there was the Rock, see? Horrors! "What
happened to me?"

Well, I don't know, what happened to them. They should be
proud of themselves if they only knew it. If they only knew
it, their pride in themselves should be very great.

That they can mock up an incident with such realism, with
such savageness, such pain and such pressure as to almost
cause them themselves to cave in is quite a remarkable
feat. But of course, they never realize this because it
wouldn't cave them in if they were taking any responsibility
for it, which they aren't. Just a little responsibility
applied to a case at the point where it's about to go up
through the roof will take the curse off the blow.

And you can make a blow smooth right out with some
Responsibility of one kind or another.

Now, when you get an actual blow, and the person is leaving
and so forth, and it's gone, it's too late to do something
about it so you should smell one coming and ease it off.
Smell one coming and ease the thing off.

Person's getting tense, upset, something of this character.
You've already gone too long between Help and Step 6. In
other words, you've improved their mock-ups more than you
have made it possible for them to help things, you get the
idea. There's an imbalance has taken place in this session
of one kind or another.

But in view of the fact that it's almost impossible to be
100 percent right, you will still get blows. You don't see
them coming, they don't see them coming, they happen rather
fast and suddenly and they go wham!

So, don't be upset by the fact. Just realize what's
happened. His ability to create has suddenly become much
greater than his responsibility for creating it. And when
that occurs you've given him a much better, more solid,
more effective reactive bank that kicks his teeth in much
more significantly. Do you see that?

Well, taking a person over the hump, three-quarters of the
way to Clear is a skill in itself and it's something you
learn by flying by the seat of your pants. Best way to
learn it is, start to take somebody over the hump sometime.

And where people are failing to clear we have this factor
involved: First, there must be some little idea that they
really don't want to set the person free - that must be
there to some degree.

We get, then, this other factor. This other factor is much
more arduous: is that they get them almost over the hump
and then they cut the toboggan line, see, and let them go
back down the same side they came up.

Now, they're going to have an awful time getting him up to
that point in the Alps again. The fellow gets sick from
rarefied air. He doesn't like snow, and wind and cold upset
him mightily. See? And you very often find that some case
you're having difficulty clearing, particularly amongst
Scientologists, almost made it once, you know?

Then you have to address the case very directly and unwrap
the case and unwrap such incidents in auditing and therapy
as is necessary in order to get the case wheeling again.

Fortunately, Help and such processes undo what they do.
Scientology is the only subject on the face of the earth
that undoes itself. That makes it the only true science
there is. See? Scientology can wipe out what Scientology
does. I never noticed physics or chemistry doing it.

Now, where we have a case, then, as I have gone over these
things and talked about them here and shown you their
relationship to auditing, we then have in essence five
central buttons. And I've just discussed each one of these
things in turn. And each one of it has a relationship to
clearing.

And these buttons you could sort out with the greatest of
ease. Just take Clearing Procedure, then go down the line
and you will find what these buttons are.

First and foremost is Change. Hence we have CCH 0, Goals.
Change: that's the button you're hitting for. Person has
to be willing to change - otherwise he won't change.

Next button: Problems.

He must have some concept of problems that admits of their
resolution. If he doesn't have a concept of problems that
admits of their resolutions, you have a case that won't
change because PT problem can never be solved. You see?

So, your next most important button - and it was clearing,
itself, which demonstrated these buttons by the way; this
is after the fact, these buttons. We know that there are
dozens of buttons, and lots of them are very, very
important, but let's look at this clearing after the fact,
and find out what buttons were connected with clearing. We
find just these buttons are. So that problem definition has
got to be very good. Otherwise we never get a change of
profile; and we never get a Clear.

All right, let's just move up just a little bit further here.

As far as Control is concerned, we are actually working
with responsibility - responsibility.

First the auditor's willingness to take responsibility for
the person, and the person, then, sort of by contagion,
taking some responsibility for himself and the session. Got
that?

Responsibility is at work here. "Did you stop that body?"
we say in old SCS, see?

You make him take some responsibility for what's going on.
And responsibility over Start, Change and Stop is a
low-order responsibility. Responsibility over Create, and
Change, and the rest of these buttons is much greater, but
that's a low-order responsibility and we do get the case to
get a little bit of responsibility with regard to this.

So, we've got this button called Responsibility which
doesn't really fit on the scale there, but in procedure
fits there. It's actually the last button that we have
anything to do with. But we do something about it fairly early.

And then we get into this thing called Help.

Now, unless there's some kind of a definition for help that
admits of it occurring, you're never going to get anyplace,
so you want to watch it, and make sure that this definition
on the part of the preclear changes before you bash your
brains out on the rocks of "I won't." You see that?

There must be something changing about his definitions of
help if help isn't occurring easily.

And then we get the next button to that which is Create.

And of course, it's the biggest button of all. Create. And
that's a huge button. Man, you could button every bib in
the world on that one. Create.

Of course, that made the biggest operation in the world
assigning all creation and all blame, shame and regret to
some monodeistic fairy tale. See, and that made that the
biggest operation that ever occurred anyplace, at any time,
to make people more sick than any other single activity
that ever happened anywhere.

And you get some reality on this someday, and you'll say,
"What!" And you'll go down the street and look at the "I
Will Arise" church, or something like that and you'll say,
"Huh!" It'll no longer become a matter of opinion with you
but just a matter of good sense.

Because responsibility for creativeness and a knowledge of
what one is creating means sanity, effectiveness, capability
and freedom. So, its exact reverse must mean the exact
reverse.

Irresponsibility for something else which then creates
everything means naturally sickness, slavery and all of
the other ills that go along with that.

It's a nice operation. Next time you say your prayers,
remember it and get some auditing.

This doesn't say that there isn't such a thing as a
collective God of one kind or another but it certainly does
say that there isn't such a thing for a healthy man of a
total fixation on a single deity who made everything
including him!

There's a vast difference between those two things.

Now, let's look over this and find that we have established
here a little set of buttons, and a new clearing chart. And
these, you might say, are the clearing buttons.

And they are, and I'll go over them again: Change,
Problems, Help, Create and Responsibility. Or actually,
they should be in that order.

Now, any other button is so junior to these five buttons -
see, we've learned this through the actual facts of clearing
that these were the important buttons, you see - and any
other button is so junior to these buttons that it is
regulated by one or more of these buttons. So, now we're
looking at sanity and aberration and the number of
postulates a thetan can make to drive himself mad. And
behind each one of them, each great computation or huge
upset or something of the sort, we will find one or more of
these basic buttons.

Now, go over them again.

First one, Change.

Second one, Problems.

Third one, Help.

Fourth one, Create.

Fifth one, Responsibility.

Now, in session, we run Responsibility all the way through
them, and up here in position 3 in our ACC Procedure,
because we try to get the individual some responsibility
for the session or the body or something by running
Connectedness and SCS. SCS has more responsibility mixed
up in it than Connectedness.

You'll find out that his continuous refusal to change; next
one, misconcept of, scarcity of, something wrong with,
problems; aberration in his definitions, concept or conduct
or receipt of help; misconceptions as to creativeness - who
created what and where, how it creates, who doesn't have
it, the ability to create, who shouldn't create, what you
shouldn't, what you should - all of these ball up into the
reactive mind, mental image pictures, and the universe
around us.

And responsibility is the final cap that fits down over it
all and makes it, when it is irresponsibility, a good snug
fit for somebody dead in his head.

Thank you.

[End of lecture.]


