|
US OFFICE OF LRH 21 May 1974 ED #3 CONTL OF LRH US
The following despatch traffic between LRH and LRH Comm US is released with the intention of communication to all concerned, LRH's intention and policies regarding the handling of Sea Org children in the PAC area.The traffic occurred during an investigation of the children scene in PAC ordered by the Commodore and done by LRH Comm US. The evaluation resulted in the establishment of the Cadet Org. However, as there have recently been upsets and ARCxs concerning the Cadet Org and its authorities and responsibilities, it is hoped that this communication will result in increased ARC and thus understanding which will further the Commodore's goals and purposes regarding the handling of the SO children in PAC. The despatches below have been communicated to the PAC COs, and they have entusiastically agreed to support these policies and work to achieve the ideal scene specified through their own efforts in their individual Orgs as well as through the combined efforts of the PAC COs Conference. Also attached for your information are the CED programs and projects done by LRH Comm Cadet Org, Karen Spencer, and approved by Flag upon which the Cadet Org is presently operating.
"A bright idea I had was a CO Cadets and division into age groups with
group leaders of each group, and a Sea Org school part time. The little
shavers on Flag did wonderfully with stable nannies and tutors and really
only whon they had a SO school as a special part of the action that ran on
FOs. They loved it and could then be persuaded over to the three RDs. They
all have made a AB and were pleased with themselves and felt superior.
Even little four year olds. Their school room was all over decorated with
SO and AB types of items. When that was dropped they felt out of it,
gangsterism and crime came in because they were without purpose. The above
bright idea is very recent, looking back over times when children have no
real problem. Also people forget that exact HCO PL Ethics has to kept in
especially on children. They have to be hatted. And that many need their
own child MAAs, again hatted. Twice, true Suppressives, though only 5 in
one case and about 6 in another absolutely ruined not only the other kids
but also every effort to put it to rights and one Org also! By sheer
psychotic covert violence.
| ||||||
|
having to use naughtiness to be at covert cause. A Cadet Org could accomplish that." LRH. Despatch to LRH Comm US 25 August 1973. "This is as far as we have gotten: Parents have dumped their parents hats on SO. SO has consistently dumped its Cadet hat on parents in PAC (a fact I just recently added up) by using them as a via. The result has been ruddy old mess of no resposibility on either side - a between two chairs scene. I was glad to sort this much of it out as I have been absolutely flabbergasted whe orders to Pac about children when routinely unexecuted. Naturally! They were being dumped on a no terminal, a via I never for an instant expected anyone would be dumb enough to use. Yet I suppose I could have guessed it as it parallels the American family pattern of have poppa hit because Johnny broke a window because all Johnny's up to 45 (I think that is now the age of majority parents have for their sons) are irresponsible dears that ought to be euthanasied. Now with THIS much seen through maybe one could complete an evaluation looking for other points and maybe actually fix responsibility for the children on proper SO terminals and get something done that is effective, based on what has been effective in the past. And we'd have some fine kids, who also love their parents. It's a cloudy scene of kids in public schools but really maybe not, of older kids teaching younger ones how to be tough. An effort to put it on a family organization type is going to fail, I guarantee you that." LRH. Despatch to LRH Comm US 27 August 1973.
"Hey Toby! I just found out why I couldn't really get the child scene
up on Flag and why they got offloaded.
"This despatch on children and the message about them may run a bit
counter to cultural or group ideas. But they have to get educated and I
see no sign of any organization to do it and it would be months or a year
anyway. There seems to be a fear of officials. That's understandable. But
that fear could lead to pulling them in. Only offensive actions handle
Officials. We must force officials to cooperate and work to handle and
such scene. This makes them feel responsible and important. They don't want
a 'Officials refuse to cooperate in educating children.' This will be hard
at first. Also hard on the kids. But the way to handle it is special
coaching after school and very solid hatting in a Cadet Org USING STUDY
TECH. That makes a lot of little geniuses out of them. Also somebody is
going to propose a uniform BUT CHILDREN MUST NOT WEAR ONE TO SCHOOL as
they'd catch it.
| ||||||
|
be available to every child and a unit in the Cadet Org would pound it home even if the org isn't there yet. IF YOU WROTE A PGM ON THIS ORDER AND COUNTED ITS STATS IT WOULD BRING IN THE SUNDAES. The program is of course 'Get the Study Tech on the Children.' " LRH. Despatch to LRH Comm US 15 September 1973.
"However, I have found the why of this scene. Parents bringing
children into the SO dump their parents hats on the SO and the SO instead
of taking responsibility dump the hat back on the parents resulting in a
totally cross ordered and scrambled scene that no stable organization can
be gotten into. I found for instance that everyorder I issued about
children at Flag was at once referred to a parent and not one personnel to
whom such an order was issued ever carried it out. This cost children Flag.
It is making the trouble in Pac. |